Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018. doi: 10.18653/v1/n18-1170. URL https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n18-1170.
[79] R. Jia and P. Liang. Adversarial examples for evaluating reading comprehension systems. In M. Palmer, R. Hwa, and S. Riedel, editors, Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2017, Copenhagen, Denmark, September 9-11, 2017, pages 2021-2031. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017. doi: 10.18653/v1/d17-1215. URL https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d17-1215.
[80] D. Jin, Z. Jin, J. T. Zhou, and P. Szolovits. Is BERT really robust? A strong baseline for natural language attack on text classification and entailment. In AAAI, 2020.
[81] Z. Jin, S. Levine, F. G. Adauto, O. Kamal, M. Sap, M. Sachan, R. Mihalcea, J. Tenenbaum, and B. Schölkopf. When to make exceptions: Exploring language models as accounts of human moral judgment. In NeurIPS, 2022.
[82] N. Kandpal, E. Wallace, and C. Raffel. Deduplicating training data mitigates privacy risks in language models. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 10697-10707. PMLR, 2022.
[83] D. Kang, X. Li, I. Stoica, C. Guestrin, M. Zaharia, and T. Hashimoto. Exploiting programmatic behavior of lms: Dual-use through standard security attacks. CoRR, abs/2302.05733, 2023.
[84] M. Kang, L. Li, M. Weber, Y. Liu, C. Zhang, and B. Li. Certifying some distributional fairness with subpopulation decomposition. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35: 31045-31058, 2022.
[85] J. Kasai, K. Sakaguchi, Y. Takahashi, R. L. Bras, A. Asai, X. Yu, D. Radev, N. A. Smith, Y. Choi, and K. Inui. Realtime qa: What's the answer right now? arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.13332, 2022.
[86] D. Kaushik, E. Hovy, and Z. Lipton. Learning the difference that makes a difference with counterfactually-augmented data. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.
[87] M. Keevak. 204How Did East Asians Become Yellow? In Reconsidering Race: Social Science Perspectives on Racial Categories in the Age of Genomics. Oxford University Press, 06 2018. ISBN 9780190465285. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190465285. 003.0011. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190465285.003.0011.
[88] F. Khani and P. Liang. Feature noise induces loss discrepancy across groups. International Conference On Machine Learning, 2019.
[89] J. Kim, H. J. Kim, H. Cho, H. Jo, S.-W. Lee, S.-g. Lee, K. M. Yoo, and T. Kim. Ground-truth labels matter: A deeper look into input-label demonstrations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.12685, 2022.
[90] B. Klimt and Y. Yang. The enron corpus: A new dataset for email classification research. In Machine Learning: ECML 2004: 15th European Conference on Machine Learning, Pisa, Italy, September 20-24, 2004. Proceedings 15, pages 217-226. Springer, 2004.
[91] P. W. Koh, S. Sagawa, H. Marklund, S. M. Xie, M. Zhang, A. Balsubramani, W. Hu, M. Yasunaga, R. L. Phillips, I. Gao, T. Lee, E. David, I. Stavness, W. Guo, B. Earnshaw, I. S. Haque, S. M. Beery, J. Leskovec, A. Kundaje, E. Pierson, S. Levine, C. Finn, and P. Liang. WILDS: A benchmark of in-the-wild distribution shifts. In M. Meila and T. Zhang, editors, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2021, 18-24 July 2021, Virtual Event, volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 5637-5664. PMLR, 2021. URL http://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/koh21a.html.
[92] T. Kojima, S. Gu, M. Reid, Y. Matsuo, and Y. Iwasawa. Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
[93] K. Krishna, J. Wieting, and M. Iyyer. Reformulating unsupervised style transfer as paraphrase generation. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 737-762, Online, Nov. 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.55. URL https://aclanthology.org/2020.emnlp-main.55.
[94] M. J. Kusner, J. Loftus, C. Russell, and R. Silva. Counterfactual fairness. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.