[7] Xiang Wang, Ying-Xin Wu, An Zhang, Xiangnan He, and Tat-Seng Chua. Towards multigrained explainability for graph neural networks. In Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021.
[8] Dongsheng Luo, Wei Cheng, Dongkuan Xu, Wenchao Yu, Bo Zong, Haifeng Chen, and Xiang Zhang. Parameterized explainer for graph neural network. In NeurIPS, 2020.
[9] Minh N. Vu and My T. Thai. Pgm-explainer: Probabilistic graphical model explanations for graph neural networks. In NeurIPS, 2020.
[10] Anonymous. Dag matters! gflows nets enhanced explainer for graph neural networks. In Openreview, 2022.
[11] Caihua Shan, Yifei Shen, Yao Zhang, Xiang Li, and Dongsheng Li. Reinforcement learning enhanced explainer for graph neural networks. In NeurIPS, 2021.
[12] Ramaravind K Mothilal, Amit Sharma, and Chenhao Tan. Explaining machine learning classifiers through diverse counterfactual explanations. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pages 607-617, 2020.
[13] Ana Lucic, Maartje A. ter Hoeve, Gabriele Tolomei, Maarten de Rijke, and Fabrizio Silvestri. Cf-gnnexplainer: Counterfactual explanations for graph neural networks. In AISTATS 2022, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 2022.
[14] Sahil Verma, John Dickerson, and Keegan Hines. Counterfactual explanations for machine learning: A review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.10596, 2020.
[15] Hao Yuan, Jiliang Tang, Xia Hu, and Shuiwang Ji. XGNN: towards model-level explanations of graph neural networks. In Rajesh Gupta, Yan Liu, Jiliang Tang, and B. Aditya Prakash, editors, KDD, pages 430-438, 2020.
[16] Xiaoqi Wang and Han-Wei Shen. Gnninterpreter: A probabilistic generative model-level explanation for graph neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.07924, 2022.
[17] Timo Freiesleben. The intriguing relation between counterfactual explanations and adversarial examples. *Minds and Machines*, 32(1):77–109, 2022.
[18] Hanjun Dai, Hui Li, Tian Tian, Xin Huang, Lin Wang, Jun Zhu, and Le Song. Adversarial attack on graph structured data. In ICML, pages 1123-1132, 2018.
[19] Clement Vignac, Igor Krawczuk, Antoine Siraudin, Bohan Wang, Volkan Cevher, and Pascal Frossard. Digress: Discrete denoising diffusion for graph generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14734, 2022.
[20] Kilian Konstantin Haefeli, Karolis Martinkus, Nathanaël Perraudin, and Roger Wattenhofer. Diffusion models for graphs benefit from discrete state spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.01549, 2022.
[21] Ramprasaath R. Selvaraju, Michael Cogswell, Abhishek Das, Ramakrishna Vedantam, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In ICCV, pages 618-626, 2017.
[22] Mukund Sundararajan, Ankur Taly, and Qiqi Yan. Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. In ICML, volume 70, pages 3319-3328, 2017.
[23] Jianbo Chen, Le Song, Martin J. Wainwright, and Michael I. Jordan. Learning to explain: An information-theoretic perspective on model interpretation. In ICML, pages 882-891, 2018.
[24] Karen Simonyan, Andrea Vedaldi, and Andrew Zisserman. Deep inside convolutional networks: Visualising image classification models and saliency maps. In ICLR, 2014.
[25] Avanti Shrikumar, Peyton Greenside, Anna Shcherbina, and Anshul Kundaje. Not just a black box: Learning important features through propagating activation differences. CoRR, 2016.