[1] Chunrong Ai, Li-Hsien Sun, Zheng Zhang, and Liping Zhu. Testing unconditional and conditional independence via mutual information. Journal of Econometrics, 2022.
[2] Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Lauren Kirchner, and Surya Mattu. Minority neighborhoods pay higher car insurance premiums than white areas with the same risk, April 2017. URL https://www_propublica.org/article/minority-neighborhoods-higher-car-insurance-premiums-white-areas-same-risk. [Online; last accessed in 09-September-2022].
[3] Alexis Bellot and Mihaela van der Schaar. Conditional independence testing using generative adversarial networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019.
[4] Thomas B Berrett, Yi Wang, Rina Foygel Barber, and Richard J Samworth. The conditional permutation test for independence while controlling for confounders. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 82(1):175-197, 2020.
[5] Emmanuel Candes, Yingying Fan, Lucas Janson, and Jinchi Lv. Panning for gold: 'model-x' knockoffs for high dimensional controlled variable selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 80(3):551-577, 2018.
[6] Olivier Cappé, Eric Moulines, and Tobias Ryden. Inference in hidden markov models. In Proceedings of EUSFLAT conference, pages 14-16, 2009.
[7] Ben Dai, Xiaotong Shen, and Wei Pan. Significance tests of feature relevance for a black-box learner. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2022.
[8] Gary Doran, Krikamol Muandet, Kun Zhang, and Bernhard Scholkopf. A permutation-based kernel conditional independence test. In UAI, pages 132-141, 2014.
[9] Alexander D'Amour, Katherine Heller, Dan Moldovan, Ben Adlam, Babak Alipanahi, Alex Beutel, Christina Chen, Jonathan Deaton, Jacob Eisenstein, Matthew D Hoffman, et al. Underspecification presents challenges for credibility in modern machine learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2020.
[10] Kenji Fukumizu, Arthur Gretton, Xiaohai Sun, and Bernhard Schölkopf. Kernel measures of conditional dependence. Advances in neural information processing systems, 20, 2007.
[11] Clark Glymour, Kun Zhang, and Peter Spirtes. Review of causal discovery methods based on graphical models. Frontiers in genetics, 10:524, 2019.
[12] Patrik Hoyer, Dominik Janzing, Joris M Mooij, Jonas Peters, and Bernhard Scholkopf. Nonlinear causal discovery with additive noise models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 21, 2008.
[13] Rafael Izbicki and Ann B. Lee. Converting high-dimensional regression to high-dimensional conditional density estimation. 2017.
[14] Dimitris Kalimeris, Gal Kaplun, Preetum Nakkiran, Benjamin Edelman, Tristan Yang, Boaz Barak, and Haofeng Zhang. Sgd on neural networks learns functions of increasing complexity. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
[15] Ilmun Kim, Matey Neykov, Sivaraman Balakrishnan, and Larry Wasserman. Local permutation tests for conditional independence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11666, 2021.
[16] Mariusz Kubkowski, Jan Mielniczuk, and Pawel Teisseyre. How to gain on power: Novel conditional independence tests based on short expansion of conditional mutual information. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 22:62-1, 2021.
[17] Erich L Lehmann and George Casella. Theory of point estimation. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.
[18] Erich Leo Lehmann, Joseph P Romano, and George Casella. Testing statistical hypotheses, volume 3. Springer, 2005.