[1] J. Angwin, J. Larson, S. Mattu, and L. Kirchner. Machine bias: There's software used across the country to predict future criminals. and it's biased against blacks. ProPublica, 5 2016. URL https://www-propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing.
[2] S. Athey and S. Wager. Policy learning with observational data. *Econometrica*, 89(1):133–161, 2021.
[3] A. Balke and J. Pearl. Counterfactual probabilities: Computational methods, bounds and applications. In Uncertainty Proceedings 1994, pages 46-54. Elsevier, 1994.
[4] N. Bennett, D. Plečko, I.-F. Ukor, N. Meinshausen, and P. Buhlmann. ricu: R's interface to intensive care data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.00796, 2021.
[5] E. L. D. Biddison, R. Faden, H. S. Gwon, D. P. Mareiniss, A. C. Regenberg, M. Schoch-Spana, J. Schwartz, and E. S. Toner. Too many patients... a framework to guide statewide allocation of scarce mechanical ventilation during disasters. Chest, 155(4):848-854, 2019.
[6] T. Brennan, W. Dieterich, and B. Ehret. Evaluating the predictive validity of the compas risk and needs assessment system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(1):21-40, 2009.
[7] J. Buolamwini and T. Gebru. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In S. A. Friedler and C. Wilson, editors, Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, volume 81 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 77–91, NY, USA, 2018.
[8] S. Chiappa. Path-specific counterfactual fairness. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 33, pages 7801-7808, 2019.
[9] A. Coston, A. Mishler, E. H. Kennedy, and A. Chouldechova. Counterfactual risk assessments, evaluation, and fairness. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 582-593, 2020.
[10] A. Datta, M. C. Tschantz, and A. Datta. Automated experiments on ad privacy settings: A tale of opacity, choice, and discrimination. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2015 (1):92-112, Apr. 2015. doi: 10.1515/popets-2015-0007.
[11] M. Dudík, J. Langford, and L. Li. Doubly robust policy evaluation and learning. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML'11, page 1097-1104, Madison, WI, USA, 2011. Omnipress. ISBN 9781450306195.
[12] C. E. Frangakis and D. B. Rubin. Principal stratification in causal inference. Biometrics, 58(1): 21-29, 2002.
[13] M. A. Hamburg and F. S. Collins. The path to personalized medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(4):301-304, 2010.
[14] K. Imai and Z. Jiang. Principal fairness for human and algorithmic decision-making. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.10400, 2020.
[15] T. R. Insel. Translating scientific opportunity into public health impact: a strategic plan for research on mental illness. Archives of general psychiatry, 66(2):128-133, 2009.
[16] A. Johnson, L. Bulgarelli, T. Pollard, S. Horng, L. A. Celi, and R. Mark. Mimic-iv. PhysioNet. Available online at: https://physionet.org/content/mimiciv/1.0/(accessed August 23, 2021), 2020.
[17] A. E. Johnson, L. Bulgarelli, L. Shen, A. Gayles, A. Shammout, S. Horng, T. J. Pollard, B. Moody, B. Gow, L.-w. H. Lehman, et al. Mimic-iv, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset. Scientific data, 10(1):1, 2023.
[18] N. Kallus. Balanced policy evaluation and learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018.