[13] Ziwei Ji and Matus Telgarsky. The implicit bias of gradient descent on nonseparable data. In Alina Beygelzimer and Daniel Hsu, editors, Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Conference on Learning Theory, volume 99 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 1772-1798. PMLR, 25-28 Jun 2019. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v99/ji19a.html.
[14] Nitish Joshi and He He. An investigation of the (in)effectiveness of counterfactually augmented data. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3668-3681, Dublin, Ireland, May 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.256. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.acl-long.256.
[15] Jivat Neet Kaur, Emre Kiciman, and Amit Sharma. Modeling the data-generating process is necessary for out-of-distribution generalization. In ICML 2022: Workshop on Spurious Correlations, Invariance and Stability, 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=KfB7QnuseT9.
[16] Divyansh Kaushik, Amrith Setlur, Eduard Hovy, and Zachary C Lipton. Explaining the efficacy of counterfactually augmented data. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2021.
[17] Divyansh Kaushik, Amrith Setlur, Eduard H Hovy, and Zachary Chase Lipton. Explaining the efficacy of counterfactually augmented data. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=HHiiQKWsOcV.
[18] Pang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie, Marvin Zhang, Akshay Balsubramani, Weihua Hu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Richard Lanas Phillips, Irena Gao, Tony Lee, Etienne David, Ian Stavness, Wei Guo, Berton Earnshaw, Imran Haque, Sara M Beery, Jure Leskovec, Anshul Kundaje, Emma Pierson, Sergey Levine, Chelsea Finn, and Percy Liang. Wilds: A benchmark of in-the-wild distribution shifts. In Marina Meila and Tong Zhang, editors, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 5637-5664. PMLR, 18-24 Jul 2021. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/koh21a.html.
[19] Abhinav Kumar, Chenhao Tan, and Amit Sharma. Probing classifiers are unreliable for concept removal and detection. In S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35, pages 17994-18008. Curran Associates, Inc., 2022. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/725f5e8036cc08adeba4a7c3bc6c6f2c-Paper-Conference.pdf.
[20] Yann LeCun, Corinna Cortes, and CJ Burges. Mnist handwritten digit database. ATT Labs [Online]. Available: http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist, 2, 2010.
[21] Evan Z Liu, Behzad Haghgoo, Annie S Chen, Aditi Raghunathan, Pang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Percy Liang, and Chelsea Finn. Just train twice: Improving group robustness without training group information. In Marina Meila and Tong Zhang, editors, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 6781-6792. PMLR, 18-24 Jul 2021. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/liu21f.html.
[22] Maggie Makar, Ben Packer, Dan I. Moldovan, Davis W. Blalock, Yoni Halpern, and Alexander D'Amour. Causally-motivated shortcut removal using auxiliary labels. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2021.
[23] Tom McCoy, Ellie Pavlick, and Tal Linzen. Right for the wrong reasons: Diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 3428-3448, Florence, Italy, July 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:10.18653/v1/P19-1334. URL https://aclanthology.org/P19-1334.
[24] S Chandra Mouli and Bruno Ribeiro. Neural networks for learning counterfactual g-invariances from single environments. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=7t1FcJUWhi3.