[1] Drummond Rennie. Let's make peer review scientific. Nature, 535(7610):31-33, 2016.
[2] Drazen Prelec, H Sebastian Seung, and John McCoy. A solution to the single-question crowd wisdom problem. Nature, 541(7638):532-535, 2017.
[3] Drazen Prelec. A Bayesian Truth Serum for subjective data. Science, 306(5695):462-466, 2004.
[4] Itai Arieli, Yakov Babichenko, and Rann Smorodinsky. Robust forecast aggregation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(52):E12135-E12143, 2018.
[5] Michael J Mahoney. Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive therapy and research, 1(2):161-175, 1977.
[6] Charles E Hess. Biases of research in the agricultural sciences. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, pages 348-353, 1977.
[7] Carole J Lee, Cassidy R Sugimoto, Guo Zhang, and Blaise Cronin. Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(1):2-17, 2013.
[8] Andrew Tomkins, Min Zhang, and William D Heavlin. Reviewer bias in single-versus double-blind peer review. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(48):12708-12713, 2017.
[9] Ivan Stelmakh, Nihar Shah, and Aarti Singh. On testing for biases in peer review. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019.
[10] Flaminio Squazzoni, Giangiacomo Bravo, Mike Farjam, Ana Marusic, Bahar Mehmani, Michael Willis, Aliaksandr Birukou, Pierpaolo Dondio, and Francisco Grimaldo. Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals. Science advances, 7(2):eabd0299, 2021.
[11] Ivan Stelmakh, Charvi Rastogi, Ryan Liu, Shuchi Chawla, Federico Echenique, and Nihar B Shah. Cite-seeing and reviewing: A study on citation bias in peer review. Plos one, 18(7):e0283980, 2023.
[12] Carole J Lee. Commensuration bias in peer review. Philosophy of Science, 82(5):1272-1283, 2015.
[13] Ivan Stelmakh, Nihar B Shah, Aarti Singh, and Hal Daumé III. Prior and prejudice: The novice reviewers' bias against resubmissions in conference peer review. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1):1-17, 2021.
[14] Magnus Roos, Jörg Rothe, Joachim Rudolph, Björn Scheuermann, and Dietrich Stoyan. A statistical approach to calibrating the scores of biased reviewers: The linear vs. the nonlinear model. In Multidisciplinary Workshop on Advances in Preference Handling, volume 2, page 5, 2012.
[15] Magnus Roos, Jörg Rothe, and Björn Scheuermann. How to calibrate the scores of biased reviewers by quadratic programming. In Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2011.
[16] Emaad Manzoor and Nihar B Shah. Uncovering latent biases in text: Method and application to peer review. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 35, pages 4767-4775, 2021.
[17] Weijie Su. You are the best reviewer of your own papers: An owner-assisted scoring mechanism. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:27929-27939, 2021.
[18] Jingyan Wang and Nihar B Shah. Your 2 is my 1, your 3 is my 9: Handling arbitrary miscalibrations in ratings. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pages 864-872, 2019.
[19] Siddarth Srinivasan and Jamie Morgenstern. Auctions and prediction markets for scientific peer review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.00923, 08 2021.