[57] Z. Liu, M. Sun, T. Zhou, G. Huang, and T. Darrell. Rethinking the value of network pruning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.05270, 2018.
[58] C. Louizos, M. Welling, and D. P. Kingma. Learning sparse neural networks through  $l\_0$  regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.01312, 2017.
[59] J.-H. Luo, J. Wu, and W. Lin. Thinet: A filter level pruning method for deep neural network compression. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 5058-5066, 2017.
[60] X. Mao, Q. Li, H. Xie, R. Y. Lau, Z. Wang, and S. Paul Smolley. Least squares generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 2794–2802, 2017.
[61] T. Miyato, T. Kataoka, M. Koyama, and Y. Yoshida. Spectral normalization for generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05957, 2018.
[62] D. C. Mocanu, E. Mocanu, P. Stone, P. H. Nguyen, M. Gibescu, and A. Liotta. Scalable training of artificial neural networks with adaptive sparse connectivity inspired by network science. Nature communications, 9(1):1-12, 2018.
[63] P. Molchanov, A. Mallya, S. Tyree, I. Frosio, and J. Kautz. Importance estimation for neural network pruning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 11264–11272, 2019.
[64] H. Mostafa and X. Wang. Parameter efficient training of deep convolutional neural networks by dynamic sparse reparameterization. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 4646-4655. PMLR, 2019.
[65] S. M. Patil and C. Dovrolis. Phew: Constructing sparse networks that learn fast and generalize well without training data. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 8432-8442. PMLR, 2021.
[66] A. Radford, L. Metz, and S. Chintala. Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06434, 2015.
[67] M. Rastegari, V. Ordonez, J. Redmon, and A. Farhadi. Xnor-net: Imagenet classification using binary convolutional neural networks. In European conference on computer vision, pages 525-542. Springer, 2016.
[68] A. Renda, J. Frankle, and M. Carbin. Comparing rewinding and fine-tuning in neural network pruning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.02389, 2020.
[69] T. Salimans, I. Goodfellow, W. Zaremba, V. Cheung, A. Radford, and X. Chen. Improved techniques for training gans. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016.
[70] A. Sauer, K. Schwarz, and A. Geiger. Stylegan-xl: Scaling stylegan to large diverse datasets. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 conference proceedings, pages 1-10, 2022.
[71] P. Savarese, H. Silva, and M. Maire. Winning the lottery with continuous sparsification. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:11380-11390, 2020.
[72] H. Shu, Y. Wang, X. Jia, K. Han, H. Chen, C. Xu, Q. Tian, and C. Xu. Co-evolutionary compression for unpaired image translation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3235-3244, 2019.
[73] S. Srinivas, A. Subramanya, and R. Venkatesh Babu. Training sparse neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pages 138-145, 2017.
[74] R. Sun, T. Fang, and A. Schwing. Towards a better global loss landscape of gans. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:10186-10198, 2020.