[5] Naftali Harris and Mathias Drton. Pc algorithm for nonparanormal graphical models. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 14(69):3365-3383, 2013. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v14/harris13a.html.
[6] Joseph Ramsey, Peter Spirtes, and Jiji Zhang. Adjacency-Faithfulness and Conservative Causal Inference. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 401-408, 2006.
[7] Caroline Uhler, G. Raskutti, Peter Buhlmann, and B. Yu. Geometry of the faithfulness assumption in causal inference. The Annals of Statistics, 41, 07 2012. doi: 10.1214/12-AOS1080.
[8] Hans Reichenbach. The Direction of Time. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications, 1956.
[9] David Maxwell Chickering. Optimal structure identification with greedy search. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3(null):507-554, mar 2003. ISSN 1532-4435. doi: 10.1162/153244303321897717. URL https://doi.org/10.1162/153244303321897717.
[10] Kun Zhang and Aapo Hyvärinen. On the identifiability of the post-nonlinear causal model. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI '09, page 647-655, Arlington, Virginia, USA, 2009. AUAI Press. ISBN 9780974903958.
[11] Patrik Hoyer, Dominik Janzing, Joris M Mooij, Jonas Peters, and Bernhard Schölkopf. Nonlinear causal discovery with additive noise models. In D. Koller, D. Schuurmans, Y. Bengio, and L. Bottou, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 21. Curran Associates, Inc., 2008. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2008/file/f7664060cc52bc6f3d620bcdec94a4b6-Paper.pdf.
[12] Shohei Shimizu, Patrik O. Hoyer, Aapo Hyvarinen, and Antti Kerminen. A linear non-gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 7:2003-2030, dec 2006. ISSN 1532-4435.
[13] Jonas Peters, Joris M. Mooij, Dominik Janzing, and Bernhard Scholkopf. Causal discovery with continuous additive noise models. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 15(1):2009-2053, jan 2014. ISSN 1532-4435.
[14] Clark Glymour, Kun Zhang, and Peter Spirtes. Review of causal discovery methods based on graphical models. Frontiers in Genetics, 10, 2019. ISSN 1664-8021. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00524. URL https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2019.00524.
[15] Kun Zhang, Mingming Gong, Joseph Ramsey, Kayhan Batmanghelich, Peter Spirtes, and Clark Glymour. Causal discovery in the presence of measurement error: Identifiability conditions. 06 2017.
[16] Richard Scheines and Joseph Ramsey. Measurement error and causal discovery. CEUR workshop proceedings, 1792:1-7, 06 2016.
[17] Christina Heinze-Deml, Marloes H. Maathuis, and Nicolai Meinshausen. Causal structure learning. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 5(1):371-391, 2018. doi: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100630.
[18] Joris Mooij, Jonas Peters, Dominik Janzing, Jakob Zscheischler, and Bernhard Schölkopf. Distinguishing cause from effect using observational data: Methods and benchmarks. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17:1-102, 04 2016.
[19] Karamjit Singh, Garima Gupta, Vartika Tewari, and Gautam Shroff. Comparative benchmarking of causal discovery techniques. 08 2017.
[20] Kun Zhang and Aapo Hyvarinen. Causality discovery with additive disturbances: An information-theoretical perspective. In Wray Buntine, Marko Grobelnik, Dunja Mladenic, and John Shawe-Taylor, editors, Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 570-585, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[21] Aapo Hyvarinen. Estimation of non-normalized statistical models by score matching. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6(24):695-709, 2005. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v6/hyvarinen05a.html.
[22] Yingzhen Li and Richard Turner. Gradient estimators for implicit models. 05 2017.
[23] Paul Rolland, Volkan Cevher, Matthäus Kleindessner, Chris Russell, Dominik Janzing, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Francesco Locatello. Score matching enables causal discovery of nonlinear additive noise models. In Kamalika Chaudhuri, Stefanie Jegelka, Le Song, Csaba Szepesvari,