[32] Justin Kang, Ramtin Pedarsani, and Kannan Ramchandran. The fair value of data under heterogeneous privacy constraints. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.13336, 2023.
[33] Bojan Karlas, David Dao, Matteo Interlandi, Bo Li, Sebastian Schelter, Wentao Wu, and Ce Zhang. Data debugging with shapley importance over end-to-end machine learning pipelines. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.11131, 2022.
[34] Michael Kearns, Mallesh Pai, Aaron Roth, and Jonathan Ullman. Mechanism design in large games: Incentives and privacy. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on Innovations in theoretical computer science, pages 403-410, 2014.
[35] Pang Wei Koh and Percy Liang. Understanding black-box predictions via influence functions. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 1885-1894. PMLR, 2017.
[36] Antti Koskela and Antti Honkela. Computing differential privacy guarantees for heterogeneous compositions using ft. CoRR, abs/2102.12412, 2021.
[37] Antti Koskela, Joonas Jälkö, and Antti Honkela. Computing tight differential privacy guarantees using fft. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 2560-2569. PMLR, 2020.
[38] Alex Krizhevsky, Geoffrey Hinton, et al. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. 2009.
[39] Yongchan Kwon and James Zou. Beta shapley: a unified and noise-reduced data valuation framework for machine learning. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 8780-8802. PMLR, 2022.
[40] Yongchan Kwon and James Zou. Data-oob: Out-of-bag estimate as a simple and efficient data value. ICML, 2023.
[41] Yann LeCun. The mnist database of handwritten digits. http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist/, 1998.
[42] Weixin Liang, Kai-Hui Liang, and Zhou Yu. Herald: An annotation efficient method to detect user disengagement in social conversations. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3652-3665, 2021.
[43] Weixin Liang, James Zou, and Zhou Yu. Beyond user self-reported likert scale ratings: A comparison model for automatic dialog evaluation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1363-1374, 2020.
[44] Jinkun Lin, Anqi Zhang, Mathias Lécuyer, Jinyang Li, Aurojit Panda, and Siddhartha Sen. Measuring the effect of training data on deep learning predictions via randomized experiments. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 13468-13504. PMLR, 2022.
[45] Jinfei Liu, Jian Lou, Junxu Liu, Li Xiong, Jian Pei, and Jimeng Sun. Dealer: an end-to-end model marketplace with differential privacy. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 14(6), 2021.
[46] Xinjian Luo, Yangfan Jiang, and Xiaokui Xiao. Feature inference attack on shapley values. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pages 2233-2247, 2022.
[47] Min Lyu, Dong Su, and Ninghui Li. Understanding the sparse vector technique for differential privacy. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 10(6), 2017.
[48] Rory Mitchell, Joshua Cooper, Eibe Frank, and Geoffrey Holmes. Sampling permutations for shapley value estimation. 2022.
[49] Arvind Narayanan and Vitaly Shmatikov. How to break anonymity of the netflix prize dataset. arXiv preprint cs/0610105, 2006.