[1] Nazmiye Ceren Abay, Yan Zhou, Murat Kantarcioglu, Bhavani Thuraisingham, and Latanya Sweeney. Privacy preserving synthetic data release using deep learning. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: European Conference, ECML PKDD 2018, Dublin, Ireland, September 10–14, 2018, Proceedings, Part I 18, pages 510–526. Springer, 2019.
[2] John M. Abowd, Robert Ashmead, Ryan Cumings-Menon, Simson Garfinkel, Micah Heineck, Christine Heiss, Robert Johns, Daniel Kifer, Philip Leclerc, Ashwin Machanavajjhala, Brett Moran, William Sexton, Matthew Spence, and Pavel Zhuravlev. The 2020 census disclosure avoidance system topdown algorithm. Harvard Data Science Review, forthcoming. Preprint https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2022/adrm/CED-WP-2022-002.html.
[3] Hassan Jameel Asghar, Ming Ding, Thierry Rakotoarivelo, Sirine Mrabet, and Mohamed Ali Kaafar. Differentially private release of high-dimensional datasets using the gaussian copula. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.01499, 2019.
[4] Sergul Aydore, William Brown, Michael Kearns, Krishnamaram Kenthapadi, Luca Melis, Aaron Roth, and Ankit A Siva. Differentially private query release through adaptive projection. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 457-467. PMLR, 2021.
[5] Borja Balle and Yu-Xiang Wang. Improving the gaussian mechanism for differential privacy: Analytical calibration and optimal denoising. In International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML, 2018.
[6] Boaz Barak, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Cynthia Dwork, Satyen Kale, Frank McSherry, and Kunal Talwar. Privacy, accuracy, and consistency too: a holistic solution to contingency table release. In Proceedings of the twenty-sixth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems, pages 273-282, 2007.
[7] Mark Bun and Thomas Steinke. Concentrated differential privacy: Simplifications, extensions, and lower bounds. In Proceedings, Part I, of the 14th International Conference on Theory of Cryptography - Volume 9985, 2016.
[8] U.S. Census Bureau. Decennial census: 2010 summary files. https://www.census.gov/mp/www/cat/decennial_census_2010/.
[9] U.S. Census Bureau. The current population survey (cps). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps.html, 2023.
[10] Kuntai Cai, Xiaoyu Lei, Jianxin Wei, and Xiaokui Xiao. Data synthesis via differentially private markov random fields. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 14(11):2190-2202, 2021.
[11] Rui Chen, Qian Xiao, Yu Zhang, and Jianliang Xu. Differentially private high-dimensional data publication via sampling-based inference. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 129-138, 2015.
[12] Steven Diamond and Stephen Boyd. CVXPY: A Python-embedded modeling language for convex optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17(83):1-5, 2016.
[13] Bolin Ding, Marianne Winslett, Jiawei Han, and Zhenhui Li. Differentially private data cubes: Optimizing noise sources and consistency. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 2011.
[14] Alexander Domahidi, Eric Chu, and Stephen Boyd. Ecos: An socp solver for embedded systems. In 2013 European control conference (ECC), pages 3071-3076. IEEE, 2013.
[15] Jinshuo Dong, Aaron Roth, and Weijie J. Su. Gaussian differential privacy. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 84(1):3-37, 2022.
[16] Dheeru Dua and Casey Graff. UCI machine learning repository, 2019.
[17] Cynthia Dwork, Krishnaram Kenthapadi, Frank McSherry, Ilya Mironov, and Moni Naor. Our data, ourselves: Privacy via distributed noise generation. In EUROCRYPT, pages 486-503, 2006.
[18] Alexander Edmonds, Aleksandar Nikolov, and Jonathan Ullman. The power of factorization mechanisms in local and central differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 425-438, 2020.