[1] Rishabh Agarwal, Dale Schuurmans, and Mohammad Norouzi. An optimistic perspective on offline reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 104-114. PMLR, 2020.
[2] Satanjeev Banerjee and Alon Lavie. Meteor: An automatic metric for mt evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments. In Proceedings of the acl workshop on intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation measures for machine translation and/or summarization, pages 65-72, 2005.
[3] Valerio Basile et al. It's the end of the gold standard as we know it. on the impact of pre-aggregation on the evaluation of highly subjective tasks. In CEUR WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS, volume 2776, pages 31-40. CEUR-WS, 2020.
[4] Florian Böhm, Yang Gao, Christian M. Meyer, Ori Shapira, Ido Dagan, and Iryna Gurevych. Better rewards yield better summaries: Learning to summarise without references. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Hong Kong, China, 2019.
[5] Yi Cheng, Wenge Liu, Wenjie Li, Jiashuo Wang, Ruihui Zhao, Bang Liu, Xiaodan Liang, and Yefeng Zheng. Improving multi-turn emotional support dialogue generation with lookahead strategy planning. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 3014-3026. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2022.
[6] Farshid Faal, Ketra Schmitt, and Jia Yuan Yu. Reward modeling for mitigating toxicity in transformer-based language models. Applied Intelligence, 53(7):8421-8435, 2023.
[7] Maxwell Forbes, Jena D Hwang, Vered Shwartz, Maarten Sap, and Yejin Choi. Social chemistry 101: Learning to reason about social and moral norms. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 653-670, 2020.
[8] Amelia Glaese, Nat McAleese, Maja Trèbacz, John Aslanides, Vlad Firoiu, Timo Ewalds, Maribeth Rauh, Laura Weidinger, Martin Chadwick, Phoebe Thacker, et al. Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgements. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14375, 2022.
[9] Yang Guan, Jingliang Duan, Shengbo Eben Li, Jie Li, Jianyu Chen, and Bo Cheng. Mixed policy gradient. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.11513, 2021.
[10] Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andrew Critch Critch, Jerry Li Li, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. Aligning ai with shared human values. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
[11] Natasha Jaques, Judy Hanwen Shen, Asma Ghandeharioun, Craig Ferguson, Agata Lapedriza, Noah Jones, Shixiang Gu, and Rosalind Picard. Human-centric dialog training via offline reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 3985-4003, 2020.
[12] Tharindu Kaluarachchi, Andrew Reis, and Suranga Nanayakkara. A review of recent deep learning approaches in human-centered machine learning. Sensors, 21(7):2514, 2021.
[13] Manfred Klenner, Anne Gohring, Michael Amsler, Sarah Ebling, Don Tuggener, Manuela Hurlimann, and Martin Volk. Harmonization sometimes harms. 2020.
[14] Bhushan Kotnis, Kiril Gashteovski, Julia Gastinger, Giuseppe Serra, Francesco Alesiani, Timo Sztyler, Ammar Shaker, Na Gong, Carolin Lawrence, and Zhao Xu. Human-centric research for nlp: Towards a definition and guiding questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.04447, 2022.
[15] Julia Kreutzer, Shahram Khadivi, Evgeny Matusov, and Stefan Riezler. Can neural machine translation be improved with user feedback? In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 3 (Industry Papers), pages 92-105, 2018.
[16] Julia Kreutzer, Joshua Uyheng, and Stefan Riezler. Reliability and learnability of human bandit feedback for sequence-to-sequence reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1777-1788, 2018.
[17] Elisa Leonardelli, Stefano Menini, Alessio Palmero Aprosio, Marco Guerini, and Sara Tonelli. Agreeing to disagree: Annotating offensive language datasets with annotators' disagreement. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 10528-10539, 2021.