[1] Agarwal, A., Beygelzimer, A., Dudík, M., Langford, J., and Wallach, H. (2018). A reductions approach to fair classification. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 60–69. PMLR.
[2] Alghamdi, W., Hsu, H., Jeong, H., Wang, H., Michalak, P. W., Asoodeh, S., and Calmon, F. P. (2022). Beyond Adult and COMPAS: Fair multi-class prediction via information projection. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
[3] Bellamy, R. K., Dey, K., Hind, M., Hoffman, S. C., Houde, S., Kannan, K., Lohia, P., Martino, J., Mehta, S., Mojsilovic, A., et al. (2018). Ai fairness 360: An extensible toolkit for detecting, understanding, and mitigating unwanted algorithmic bias. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.01943.
[4] Bertsimas, D., Delarue, A., and Pauphilet, J. (2021). Beyond impute-then-regress: Adapting prediction to missing data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.03158.
[5] Black, E., Raghavan, M., and Barocas, S. (2022). Model multiplicity: Opportunities, concerns, and solutions. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 850-863.
[6] Caton, S., Malisetty, S., and Haas, C. (2022). Impact of imputation strategies on fairness in machine learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 74:1011-1035.
[7] Celis, L. E., Huang, L., Keswani, V., and Vishnoi, N. K. (2019). Classification with fairness constraints: A meta-algorithm with provable guarantees. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pages 319-328.
[8] Chzhen, E., Denis, C., Hebiri, M., Oneto, L., and Pontil, M. (2019). Leveraging labeled and unlabeled data for consistent fair binary classification. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32.
[9] Ding, F., Hardt, M., Miller, J., and Schmidt, L. (2021). Retiring adult: New datasets for fair machine learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34.
[10] Donini, M., Oneto, L., Ben-David, S., Shawe-Taylor, J. S., and Pontil, M. (2018). Empirical risk minimization under fairness constraints. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31.
[11] Dressel, J. and Farid, H. (2018). The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism. Science Advances, 4(1):eaao5580.
[12] Dua, D. and Graff, C. (2017). UCI machine learning repository.
[13] Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., and Zemel, R. (2012). Fairness through awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd innovations in theoretical computer science conference, pages 214-226.
[14] Fernando, M.-P., César, F., David, N., and José, H.-O. (2021). Missing the missing values: The ugly duckling of fairness in machine learning. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36(7):3217-3258.
[15] Flood, S., King, M., Rodgers, R., Ruggles, S., and Warren, J. R. (2020). Integrated public use microdata series, current population survey: Version 8.0.
[16] Flores, A. W., Bechtel, K., and Lowenkamp, C. T. (2016). False positives, false negatives, and false analyses: A rejoinder to machine bias: There's software used across the country to predict future criminals. and it's biased against blacks. Fed. Probation, 80:38.
[17] Gianfrancesco, M. A., Tamang, S., Yazdany, J., and Schmajuk, G. (2018). Potential biases in machine learning algorithms using electronic health record data. JAMA Intern. Med., 178(11):1544-1547.
[18] Glickman, M., He, Y., Yucel, R., and Zaslavsky, A. M. (2008). Here's to your health: Misreporting, missing data, and multiple imputation: Improving accuracy of cancer registry databases. Chance, 21(3):55-58.