[11] Alex Fang, Gabriel Ilharco, Mitchell Wortsman, Yuhao Wan, Vaishaal Shankar, Achal Dave, and Ludwig Schmidt. Data determines distributional robustness in contrastive language image pre-training (clip). In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 6216-6234. PMLR, 2022.
[12] Yifei Ming, Ziyang Cai, Jieuxiang Gu, Yiyou Sun, Wei Li, and Yixuan Li. Delving into out-of-distribution detection with vision-language representations. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
[13] Badr Youbi Idrissi, Diane Bouchacourt, Randall Balestriero, Ivan Evtimov, Caner Hazirbas, Nicolas Ballas, Pascal Vincent, Michal Drozdal, David Lopez-Paz, and Mark Ibrahim. Imagenet-x: Understanding model mistakes with factor of variation annotations. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
[14] Matthias Minderer, Josip Djolonga, Rob Romijnders, Frances Hubis, Xiaohua Zhai, Neil Houlsby, Dustin Tran, and Mario Lucic. Revisiting the calibration of modern neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 15682-15694, 2021.
[15] Robert Geirhos, Patricia Rubisch, Claudio Michaelis, Matthias Bethge, Felix A Wichmann, and Wieland Brendel. Imagenet-trained cnns are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.
[16] Dan Hendrycks and Thomas Dietterich. Benchmarking neural network robustness to common corruptions and perturbations. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.
[17] Eric Mintun, Alexander Kirillov, and Saining Xie. On interaction between augmentations and corruptions in natural corruption robustness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 3571-3583, 2021.
[18] Dan Hendrycks and Kevin Gimpel. A baseline for detecting misclassified and out-of-distribution examples in neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2016.
[19] Jingkang Yang, Kaiyang Zhou, Yixuan Li, and Ziwei Liu. Generalized out-of-distribution detection: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.11334, 2021.
[20] Weitang Liu, Xiaoyun Wang, John Owens, and Yixuan Li. Energy-based out-of-distribution detection. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 21464-21475, 2020.
[21] Mu Cai and Yixuan Li. Out-of-distribution detection via frequency-regularized generative models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 5521–5530, 2023.
[22] Polina Kirichenko, Pavel Izmailov, and Andrew G Wilson. Why normalizing flows fail to detect out-of-distribution data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 20578-20589, 2020.
[23] Eric Nalisnick, Akihiro Matsukawa, Yee Whye Teh, Dilan Gorur, and Balaji Lakshminarayanan. Do deep generative models know what they don't know? In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2018.
[24] Lawrence Neal, Matthew Olson, Xiaoli Fern, Weng-Keen Wong, and Fuxin Li. Open set learning with counterfactual images. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 613–628, 2018.
[25] Poojan Oza and Vishal M Patel. C2ae: Class conditioned auto-encoder for open-set recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2307–2316, 2019.
[26] Jie Ren, Peter J Liu, Emily Fertig, Jasper Snoek, Ryan Poplin, Mark Depristo, Joshua Dillon, and Balaji Lakshminarayanan. Likelihood ratios for out-of-distribution detection. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019.
[27] Joan Serrà, David Álvarez, Vicenç Gómez, Olga Slizovskaia, José F Núñez, and Jordi Luque. Input complexity and out-of-distribution detection with likelihood-based generative models. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.
[28] Zhisheng Xiao, Qing Yan, and Yali Amit. Likelihood regret: An out-of-distribution detection score for variational auto-encoder. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 20685–20696, 2020.
[29] Abhijit Bendale and Terrance E Boult. Towards open set deep networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1563-1572, 2016.