[49] Hao Sun, Zhizhong Li, Xiaotong Liu, Bolei Zhou, and Dahua Lin. Policy continuation with hindsight inverse dynamics. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019.
[50] Hao Sun, Ziping Xu, Taiyi Wang, Meng Fang, and Bolei Zhou. Supervised q-learning for continuous control. In Deep Reinforcement Learning Workshop NeurIPS 2022, 2022.
[51] Jiankai Sun, Hao Sun, Tian Han, and Bolei Zhou. Neuro-symbolic program search for autonomous driving decision module design. In Conference on Robot Learning, pages 21-30. PMLR, 2021.
[52] Qianggang Ding, Sifan Wu, Hao Sun, Jiadong Guo, and Jian Guo. Hierarchical multi-scale gaussian transformer for stock movement prediction. In IJCAI, pages 4640-4646, 2020.
[53] Arthur Charpentier, Romuald Elie, and Carl Remlinger. Reinforcement learning in economics and finance. Computational Economics, pages 1-38, 2021.
[54] Omer Gottesman, Fredrik Johansson, Matthieu Komorowski, Aldo Faisal, David Sontag, Finale Doshi-Velez, and Leo Anthony Celi. Guidelines for reinforcement learning in healthcare. Nature medicine, 25(1):16-18, 2019.
[55] A Hüyük, D Jarrett, C Tekin, and M van der Schaar. Explaining by imitating: Understanding decisions by interpretable policy learning. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2021.
[56] D Jarrett, A Hüyük, and M van der Schaar. Inverse decision modeling: Learning interpretable representations of behavior. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2021.
[57] Y Qin, F Imrie, A Huyuk, D Jarrett, A E Gimson, and M van der Schaar. Closing the loop in medical decision support by understanding clinical decision-making: A case study on organ transplantation. In Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2021.
[58] A Hüyük, W R Zame, and M van der Schaar. Inferring lexicographically-ordered rewards from preferences. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2022.
[59] A Hüyük, D Jarrett, and M van der Schaar. Inverse contextual bandits: Learning how behavior evolves over time. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2022.
[60] Stephanie Milani, Nicholay Topin, Manuela Veloso, and Fei Fang. A survey of explainable reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.08434, 2022.
[61] Daniel Hein, Steffen Udluft, and Thomas A Runkler. Interpretable policies for reinforcement learning by genetic programming. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 76: 158-169, 2018.
[62] Andrew Silva, Matthew Gombolay, Taylor Killian, Ivan Jimenez, and Sung-Hyun Son. Optimization methods for interpretable differentiable decision trees applied to reinforcement learning. In International conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, pages 1855-1865. PMLR, 2020.
[63] Li Zhang, Xin Li, Mingzhong Wang, and Andong Tian. Off-policy differentiable logic reinforcement learning. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Research Track: European Conference, ECML PKDD 2021, Bilbao, Spain, September 13-17, 2021, Proceedings, Part II 21, pages 617-632. Springer, 2021.
[64] Abhinav Verma, Vijayaraghavan Murali, Rishabh Singh, Pushmeet Kohli, and Swarat Chaudhuri. Programmatically interpretable reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 5045-5054. PMLR, 2018.
[65] Aman Jhunjhunwala. Policy extraction via online q-value distillation. Master's thesis, University of Waterloo, 2019.
[66] Guiliang Liu, Oliver Schulte, Wang Zhu, and Qingcan Li. Toward interpretable deep reinforcement learning with linear model u-trees. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: European Conference, ECML PKDD 2018, Dublin, Ireland, September 10–14, 2018, Proceedings, Part II 18, pages 414–429. Springer, 2019.