[68] Matthew Ragoza, Tomohide Masuda, and David Ryan Koes. Generating 3d molecules conditional on receptor binding sites with deep generative models. Chemical science, 2022.
[69] David Schaller, Dora Šribar, Theresa Noonan, Lihua Deng, Trung Ngoc Nguyen, Szymon Pach, David Machalz, Marcel Bermudez, and Gerhard Wolber. Next generation 3d pharmacophore modeling. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, 2020.
[70] Raphael JL Townshend, Martin Vögele, Patricia Suriana, Alexander Derry, Alexander Powers, Yianni Laloudakis, Sidhika Balachandar, Bowen Jing, Brandon Anderson, Stephan Eismann, et al. Atom3d: Tasks on molecules in three dimensions. NeurIPS, 2020.
[71] Zhijian Liu, Haotian Tang, Yujun Lin, and Song Han. Point-voxel cnn for efficient 3d deep learning. In NeurIPS, 2019.
[72] Maurice Weiler, Mario Geiger, Max Welling, Wouter Boomsma, and Taco S Cohen. 3d steerable cnns: Learning rotationally equivariant features in volumetric data. NeurIPS, 2018.
[73] Ivan Diaz, Mario Geiger, and Richard Iain McKinley. An end-to-end se (3)-equivariant segmentation network. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.00351, 2023.
[74] Jiehong Lin, Hongyang Li, Ke Chen, Jiangbo Lu, and Kui Jia. Sparse steerable convolutions: An efficient learning of se (3)-equivariant features for estimation and tracking of object poses in 3d space. NeurIPS, 2021.
[75] Karel Lenc and Andrea Vedaldi. Understanding image representations by measuring their equivariance and equivalence. In CVPR, 2015.
[76] Diane Bouchacourt, Mark Ibrahim, and Ari Morcos. Grounding inductive biases in natural images: invariance stems from variations in data. In NeurIPS, 2021.
[77] Daniel Flam-Shepherd and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. Language models can generate molecules, materials, and protein binding sites directly in three dimensions as xyz, cif, and pdb files. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.05708, 2023.
[78] Matthew Ragoza, Joshua Hochuli, Elisa Idrobo, Jocelyn Sunseri, and David Ryan Koes. Protein-ligand scoring with convolutional neural networks. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2017.
[79] Michael Maser and SE Reisman. 3d computer vision models predict dft-level homo-lumo gap energies from force-field-optimized geometries. ChemRvix, 2021.
[80] Herbert Ellis Robbins. An empirical Bayes approach to statistics. In Proc. 3rd Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Probab., 1956, 1956.
[81] Koichi Miyasawa. An empirical bayes estimator of the mean of a normal population. Bull. Inst. Internat. Statist, 1961.
[82] Aapo Hyvarinen. Estimation of non-normalized statistical models by score matching. JMLR, 2005.
[83] Giorgio Parisi. Correlation functions and computer simulations. *Nuclear Physics B*, 1981.
[84] Xiang Cheng, Niladri S. Chatterji, Peter L. Bartlett, and Michael I. Jordan. Underdamped Langevin MCMC: A non-asymptotic analysis. In  $COLT$ , 2018.
[85] Matthias Sachs, Benedict Leimkuhler, and Vincent Danos. Langevin dynamics with variable coefficients and nonconservative forces: from stationary states to numerical methods. Entropy, 2017.
[86] Saeed Saremi, Ji Won Park, and Francis Bach. Chain of log-concave Markov chains. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.19473, 2023.
[87] Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In MICCAI, 2015.
[88] Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In  $ICLR$ , 2019.
[89] Noel M O'Boyle, Michael Banck, Craig A James, Chris Morley, Tim Vandermeersch, and Geoffrey R Hutchison. Open babel: An open chemical toolbox. Journal of cheminformatics, 2011.
[90] Greg Landrum. Rdkit: Open-source cheminformatics software, 2016.