[39] M. Macklin, M. Müller, N. Chentanez, and T.-Y. Kim. Unified particle physics for real-time applications. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 33(4):1-12, 2014.
[40] L. Manuelli, Y. Li, P. Florence, and R. Tedrake. Keypoints into the future: Self-supervised correspondence in model-based reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.05085, 2020.
[41] B. Mildenhall, P. P. Srinivasan, M. Tancik, J. T. Barron, R. Ramamoorthi, and R. Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. In European conference on computer vision, pages 405-421. Springer, 2020.
[42] D. Mrowca, C. Zhuang, E. Wang, N. Haber, L. Fei-Fei, J. B. Tenenbaum, and D. L. K. Yamins. Flexible neural representation for physics prediction. CoRR, abs/1806.08047, 2018.
[43] T. Pfaff, M. Fortunato, A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, and P. W. Battaglia. Learning mesh-based simulation with graph networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
[44] H. Qi, X. Wang, D. Pathak, Y. Ma, and J. Malik. Learning long-term visual dynamics with region proposal interaction networks. In ICLR, 2021.
[45] R. Riochet, J. Sivic, I. Laptev, and E. Dupoux. Occlusion resistant learning of intuitive physics from videos. CoRR, abs/2005.00069, 2020.
[46] A. N. Sanborn, V. K. Mansinghka, and T. L. Griffiths. Reconciling intuitive physics and newtonian mechanics for colliding objects. Psychological review, 120 2:411-37, 2013.
[47] A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, J. Godwin, T. Pfaff, R. Ying, J. Leskovec, and P. Battaglia. Learning to simulate complex physics with graph networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 8459-8468. PMLR, 2020.
[48] A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, N. Heess, J. T. Springenberg, J. Merel, M. A. Riedmiller, R. Hadsell, and P. W. Battaglia. Graph networks as learnable physics engines for inference and control. CoRR, abs/1806.01242, 2018.
[49] J. Schrittwieser, I. Antonoglou, T. Hubert, K. Simonyan, L. Sifre, S. Schmitt, A. Guez, E. Lockhart, D. Hassabis, T. Graepel, et al. Mastering atari, go, chess and shogi by planning with a learned model. Nature, 588(7839):604-609, 2020.
[50] H. Shi, H. Xu, Z. Huang, Y. Li, and J. Wu. Robocraft: Learning to see, simulate, and shape elasto-plastic objects with graph networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.02909, 2022.
[51] K. Smith, L. Mei, S. Yao, J. Wu, E. Spelke, J. Tenenbaum, and T. Ullman. Modeling expectation violation in intuitive physics with coarse probabilistic object representations. In H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d'Alché-Buc, E. Fox, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 32. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
[52] E. S. Spelke. Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science, 14(1):29-56, 1990.
[53] H. Suh and R. Tedrake. The surprising effectiveness of linear models for visual foresight in object pile manipulation. In International Workshop on the Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics, pages 347-363. Springer, 2020.
[54] A. Tacchetti, H. F. Song, P. A. M. Mediano, V. F. Zambaldi, N. C. Rabinowitz, T. Graepel, M. M. Botvinick, and P. W. Battaglia. Relational forward models for multi-agent learning. CoRR, abs/1809.11044, 2018.
[55] H.-Y. F. Tung, Z. Xian, M. Prabhudesai, S. Lal, and K. Fragkiadaki. 3d-oes: Viewpoint-invariant object-factorized environment simulators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.06464, 2020.
[56] T. Ullman, E. Kosoy, I. Yildirim, A. A. Soltani, M. H. Siegel, J. Tenenbaum, and E. S. Spelke. Draping an elephant: Uncovering children's reasoning about cloth-covered objects. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 3008-3014, 2019.