SlowGuess/NAACL_2021_OCR huggingface dataset:
Ekaterina Shutova, Douwe Kiela, and Jean Maillard. 2016. Black holes and white rabbits: Metaphor identification with visual features. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 160-170, San Diego, California. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Pradeep Sopory and James Price Dillard. 2002. The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3):282-419.
Gerard J. Steen. 2008. The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4):213-241.
Gerard J. Steen. 2017. Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. *Intercultural Pragmatics*, 14(1):1-24.
Gerard J. Steen, Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, and Tina Krennmayr. 2010a. Metaphor in usage. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4):765-796.
Gerard J. Steen, Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, Tina Krennmayr, and Tryntje Pasma. 2010b. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins.
Tomek Strzalkowski, Samira Shaikh, Kit Cho, George Aaron Broadwell, Laurie Feldman, Sarah Taylor, Boris Yamrom, Ting Liu, Ignacio Cases, Yuliya Peshkova, and Kyle Elliot. 2014. Computing affect in metaphors. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Metaphor in NLP, pages 42-51, Baltimore, MD. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Chang Su, Shuman Huang, and Yijiang Chen. 2017. Automatic detection and interpretation of nominal metaphor based on the theory of meaning. Neurocomputing, 219:300-311.
Chuandong Su, Fumiyo Fukumoto, Xiaoxi Huang, Jiyi Li, Rongbo Wang, and Zhiqun Chen. 2020. DeepMet: A reading comprehension paradigm for token-level metaphor detection. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Figurative Language Processing, pages 30-39, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Krishnkant Swarnkar and Anil Kumar Singh. 2018. Di-LSTM contrast: A deep neural network for metaphor detection. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Figurative Language Processing, pages 115-120, New Orleans, Louisiana. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Serra Sinem Tekiroglu, Gözde Özbal, and Carlo Strapparava. 2015. Exploring sensorial features for metaphor identification. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Metaphor in NLP, pages 31-39, Denver, Colorado. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Paul H. Thibodeau and Lera Boroditsky. 2011. Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLOS ONE, 6(2):1-11.
Paul H. Thibodeau and Lera Boroditsky. 2013. Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLOS ONE, 8(1):1-7.
Roger Tourangeau and Lance Rips. 1991. Interpreting and evaluating metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(4):452-472.
Yulia Tsvetkov, Leonid Boytsov, Anatole Gershman, Eric Nyberg, and Chris Dyer. 2014. Metaphor detection with cross-lingual model transfer. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 248-258, Baltimore, Maryland. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Peter Turney, Yair Neuman, Dan Assaf, and Yohai Cohen. 2011. Literal and metaphorical sense identification through concrete and abstract context. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 680-690, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Stephanie K. van Stee. 2018. Meta-analysis of the persuasive effects of metaphorical vs. literal messages. Communication Studies, 69(5):545-566.
Chuhan Wu, Fangzhao Wu, Yubo Chen, Sixing Wu, Zhigang Yuan, and Yongfeng Huang. 2018. Neural metaphor detecting with CNN-LSTM model. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Figurative Language Processing, pages 110-114, New Orleans, Louisiana. Association for Computational Linguistics.
S89
A Appendix: summary of metaphor identification systems
B Appendix: effects of cognitively-inspired approaches
Study	Categorical	Sensory	Incongruity	Emotion
Tekiroğlu et al. (2015)	Sensorial+;WordClass	Conc; Image	-	-
Bulat et al. (2017)	AttributeEmb+	-	-	-
Rei et al. (2017)	AttributeEmb+-	-	CosSim	-
Mykowiecka et al. (2018)	Psychosocial-	-	-	-
Shutova et al. (2016)	-	VisualEmb+	CosSim	-
Gong et al. (2020)	TopicDiff;WordClass;WordCluster	Conc+-	-	-
Dankers et al. (2019)	-	-	-	MTL+
Swarnkar and Singh (2018)	-	-	CosSim	-
Mao et al. (2018)	-	-	CosSim	-
Jang et al. (2015)	WordClass	Conc	CosSim	-
Table 3: Cognitively-inspired approaches for metaphor identification. Effect notation: positive $^{+}$ ; negative $^{-}$ ; not tested. Conc: concreteness. Image: imageability. Emb: embeddings. CosSim: cosine similarity. TopicDiff: cosine similarity between topic distributions.