Annotation	Label	Example
Question	attack	Q: Could you take that $250 million and ensure that every man, woman, and child in America has a CFPB tee shirt, ball cap, and koozie?
favor	Q: So yes, you–exactly right. We weren’t actually–we were expecting you to try to run out the clock like the last guy. But the–I want–I do want to congratulate you on your staff reduction of 0.0614 percent of your staff. So yes, that would be a sarcastic note to those that believe that you are gutting it all. I do want to give you an opportunity, though, to address a couple of things that were brought up. How many enforcement actions were taken under the former Bureau chief, Director Cordray in his first 6 months?
neutral	Q: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. As I mentioned in my opening statement there are many reviews currently going on at the EPA, in the Inspector General’s Office, Government Accountability Office, and other congressional committees, about some of these concerns you are hearing about today, Mr. Administrator, and that have been raised in the media. So my question is pretty easy. Will you commit the EPA will provide this committee with all the documents and information EPA produces for those inquiries?
Response	ans+direct	Q: So is what you are trying to do is make more information available or less information available?
R: Yes, absolutely more information available.
ans+overanswer	Q: OK. You have been attacked for flying first class. Is that illegal?
R: Congressman, that was approved by the travel office and the security team at the EPA. I have since made changes to that. But that was—
shift+correct	Q: To the public. So you are going to require that every one of these decisions or whatever they are based on, the data and the methodology as well as the conclusions are transparent and available to the public. Is that going to be on your website? How are we going to know this?
R: Well, it is actually a proposed rule, Congressman. It is actually something that we are taking comment on, and I am sure there will be a wide array of comments on that very proposal. But the objective, once again, is to ensure transparency, reproducibility, with respect to the science that we rely upon in making our decisions in rulemaking.
shift+dodge	Q: Well, you say that but that is not accurate. Do you know that manufacturers of methylene chloride paint strippers have been aware of deaths linked to this use for more than 28 years but continue to produce it? Yes or no.
R: That is actually a solvent that we are considering under the—
cant_ans+honest	Q: This is to get a little bit to the budget we are actually here to discuss, there is a program in your Agency called Leaking Underground Storage Tanks, short in acronym is LUST. The money that goes into that fund is supposed to be used to clean up or prevent leaks from underground storage tanks. To your knowledge, is there anything under current law that prevents a State from using it for other purposes? In other words, the money is supposed to be used to clean up these underground storage tanks, but my understanding is very few States use it for that purpose?
R: You know, Congressman, I am not aware of that happening but it is something that we would investigate and look into if you have some information about that happening in your State and elsewhere.
cant_ans+lying	Q: No. You answer to me whether it is, “yes” or “no.” Your response?
R: But I didn’t quite catch the beginning of the question. I’m sorry.
Explanation (free-form)	Q: Will you commit to working with Congress, and not against us, to make sure section 702 is reauthorized, either the way you want it or the way we want it?
R: Congress gets to dispose; we get to give our opinion. Does not say if they are willing to commit to working with congress or not.