SlowGuess/ACL_2020_OCR huggingface dataset:
Ashraf M. Abdul, Jo Vermeulen, Danding Wang, Brian Y. Lim, and Mohan S. Kankanhalli. 2018. Trends and trajectories for explainable, accountable and intelligible systems: An HCI research agenda. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2018, Montreal, QC, Canada, April 21-26, 2018, page 582. ACM.
David Alvarez-Melis and Tommi S. Jaakkola. 2018. On the robustness of interpretability methods. CoRR, abs/1806.08049.
Leila Arras, Franziska Horn, Gregoire Montavon, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Wojciech Samek. 2016. "what is relevant in a text document?: An interpretable machine learning approach. CoRR, abs/1612.07843.
Joris Baan, Maartje ter Hoeve, Marlies van der Wees, Anne Schuth, and Maarten de Rijke. 2019. Do transformer attention heads provide transparency in abstractive summarization? CoRR, abs/1907.00570.
Przemyslaw Biecek. 2018. DALEX: explainers for complex predictive models in R. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 19:84:1-84:5.
Oana-Maria Camburu, Eleonora Giunchiglia, Jakob Foerster, Thomas Lukasiewicz, and Phil Blunsom. 2019. Can i trust the explainer? verifying post-hoc explanatory methods.
Vicente Ivan Sánchez Carmona, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, and Sameer Singh. 2015. Towards extracting faithful and descriptive representations of latent variable models. In AAAI Spring Symposia.
Supriyo Chakraborty, Richard Tomsett, Ramya Raghavendra, Daniel Harborne, Moustafa Alzantot, Federico Cerutti, Mani Srivastava, Alun Preece, Simon Julier, Raghuveer M Rao, et al. 2017. Interpretability of deep learning models: a survey of results. In 2017 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI), pages 1-6. IEEE.
Jay DeYoung, Sarthak Jain, Nazneen Fatema Rajani, Eric Lehman, Caiming Xiong, Richard Socher, and Byron C. Wallace. 2019. Eraser: A benchmark to evaluate rationalized nlp models.
Finale Doshi-Velez and Been Kim. 2017. Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.
Shi Feng and Jordan Boyd-Graber. 2019. What can aid for me? evaluating machine learning interpretations in cooperative play. In Proceedings of the 24th
International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 19, page 229239, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Shi Feng, Eric Wallace, Alvin Grissom II, Mohit Iyyer, Pedro Rodriguez, and Jordan L. Boyd-Graber. 2018. Pathologies of neural models make interpretation difficult. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Brussels, Belgium, October 31 - November 4, 2018, pages 3719-3728. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Karen Fort and Alain Couillault. 2016. Yes, we care! results of the ethics and natural language processing surveys. In LREC.
Reza Ghaeini, Xiaoli Z. Fern, and Prasad Tadepalli. 2018. Interpreting recurrent and attention-based neural models: a case study on natural language inference. CoRR, abs/1808.03894.
Amirata Ghorbani, Abubakar Abid, and James Zou. 2019. Interpretation of neural networks is fragile. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 33, pages 3681-3688.
Leilani H Gilpin, David Bau, Ben Z Yuan, Ayesha Bajwa, Michael Specter, and Lalana Kagal. 2018. Explaining explanations: An overview of interpretability of machine learning. In 2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on data science and advanced analytics (DSAA), pages 80-89. IEEE.
Riccardo Guidotti, Anna Monreale, Salvatore Ruggieri, Franco Turini, Fosca Giannotti, and Dino Pedreschi. 2018. A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ACM Comput. Surv., 51(5):93:1-93:42.
L.A. Harrington, M.D. Morley, A. Scedrov, and S.G. Simpson. 1985. *Harvey Friedman's Research on the Foundations of Mathematics*. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. Elsevier Science.
Bernease Herman. 2017. The promise and peril of human evaluation for model interpretability. CoRR, abs/1711.07414. Withdrawn.
Alon Jacovi, Oren Sar Shalom, and Yoav Goldberg. 2018. Understanding convolutional neural networks for text classification. In Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, pages 56-65.
Sarthak Jain and Byron C. Wallace. 2019. Attention is not explanation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2019, Minneapolis, MN, USA, June 2-7, 2019, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 3543-3556. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Harmanpreet Kaur, Harsha Nori, Samuel Jenkins, Rich Caruana, Hanna M. Wallach, and Jennifer Wortman
Vaughan. 2019. Interpreting interpretability: Understanding data scientists use of interpretability tools for machine learning.
Been Kim, Martin Wattenberg, Justin Gilmer, Carrie Cai, James Wexler, Fernanda Viegas, and Rory Sayres. 2017. Interpretability beyond feature attribution: Quantitative testing with concept activation vectors (tcav).
Pieter-Jan Kindermans, Sara Hooker, Julius Adebayo, Maximilian Alber, Kristof T. Schutt, Sven Dähne, Dumitru Erhan, and Been Kim. 2019. The (un)reliability of saliency methods. In Wojciech Samek, Grégoire Montavon, Andrea Vedaldi, Lars Kai Hansen, and Klaus-Robert Müller, editors, Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning, volume 11700 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 267-280. Springer.
Isaac Lage, Emily Chen, Jeffrey He, Menaka Narayanan, Been Kim, Sam Gershman, and Finale Doshi-Velez. 2019. An evaluation of the human-interpretability of explanation. CoRR, abs/1902.00006.
Himabindu Lakkaraju, Ece Kamar, Rich Caruana, and Jure Leskovec. 2019. Faithful and customizable explanations of black box models. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, AIES 2019, Honolulu, HI, USA, January 27-28, 2019, pages 131-138. ACM.
Jaesong Lee, Joong-Hwi Shin, and Jun-Seok Kim. 2017. Interactive visualization and manipulation of attention-based neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, pages 121-126, Copenhagen, Denmark. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Zachary C. Lipton. 2018. The mythos of model interpretability. Commun. ACM, 61(10):36-43.
Scott M. Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, 4-9 December 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, pages 4765-4774.
Sina Mohseni and Eric D. Ragan. 2018. A human-grounded evaluation benchmark for local explanations of machine learning. CoRR, abs/1801.05075.
W. James Murdoch, Chandan Singh, Karl Kumbier, Reza Abbasi-Asl, and Bin Yu. 2019. Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applications. ArXiv, abs/1901.04592.
Dong Nguyen. 2018. Comparing automatic and human evaluation of local explanations for text classification. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language
Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pages 1069-1078, New Orleans, Louisiana. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Nina Pörner, Hinrich Schütze, and Benjamin Roth. 2018. Evaluating neural network explanation methods using hybrid documents and morphological prediction. CoRR, abs/1801.06422.
Danish Pruthi, Mansi Gupta, Bhuwan Dhingra, Graham Neubig, and Zachary C. Lipton. 2019. Learning to deceive with attention-based explanations. CoRR, abs/1909.07913.
Nazneen Fatema Rajani, Bryan McCann, Caiming Xiong, and Richard Socher. 2019. Explain yourself! leveraging language models for commonsense reasoning. CoRR, abs/1906.02361.
Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. "Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '16, pages 1135-1144, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Cynthia Rudin. 2018. Please stop explaining black box models for high stakes decisions. CoRR, abs/1811.10154.
Sofia Serrano and Noah A. Smith. 2019. Is attention interpretable? In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2019, Florence, Italy, July 28-August 2, 2019, Volume 1: Long Papers, pages 2931-2951.
Julia Strout, Ye Zhang, and Raymond J. Mooney. 2019. Do human rationales improve machine explanations? CoRR, abs/1905.13714.
Madhumita Sushil, Simon Šuster, and Walter Daelemans. 2018. Rule induction for global explanation of trained models. In Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, pages 82-97, Brussels, Belgium. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Shikhar Vashishth, Shyam Upadhyay, Gaurav Singh Tomar, and Manaal Faruqui. 2019. Attention interpretability across NLP tasks. CoRR, abs/1909.11218.
Jesse Vig and Yonatan Belinkov. 2019. Analyzing the structure of attention in a transformer language model. CoRR, abs/1906.04284.
Hilde J. P. Weerts, Werner van Ipenburg, and Mykola Pechenizkiy. 2019. A human-grounded evaluation of SHAP for alert processing. CoRR, abs/1907.03324.
Sarah Wegreffe and Yuval Pinter. 2019. Attention is not not explanation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language
Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019, Hong Kong, China, November 3-7, 2019, pages 11-20. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Lior Wolf, Tomer Galanti, and Tamir Hazan. 2019. A formal approach to explainability. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, AIES 2019, Honolulu, HI, USA, January 27-28, 2019, pages 255-261. ACM.
Jialin Wu and Raymond J. Mooney. 2018. Faithful multimodal explanation for visual question answering. CoRR, abs/1809.02805.
Wenting Xiong, Iftitahu Ni'mah, Juan M. G. Huesca, Werner van Ipenburg, Jan Veldsink, and Mykola Pechenizkiy. 2018. Looking deeper into deep learning model: Attribution-based explanations of textCNN. CoRR, abs/1811.03970.
Mo Yu, Shiyu Chang, Yang Zhang, and Tommi S. Jaakkola. 2019. Rethinking cooperative rationalization: Introspective extraction and complement control. CoRR, abs/1910.13294.
Omar Zaidan and Jason Eisner. 2008. Modeling annotators: A generative approach to learning from annotator rationales. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 31-40, Honolulu, Hawaii. Association for Computational Linguistics.