SlowGuess/ACL_2020_OCR huggingface dataset:
Commonsense inference on events, intents, and reactions. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 463-473, Melbourne, Australia. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Kyle Richardson, Hai Hu, Lawrence S Moss, and Ashish Sabharwal. 2020. Probing natural language inference models through semantic fragments. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-20).
Bertrand Russell. 1905. On denoting. Mind, 14(56):479-493.
Martin Schmitt and Hinrich Schütze. 2019. SherLiIc: A typed event-focused lexical inference benchmark for evaluating natural language inference. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 902-914, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Sebastian Schuster, Yuxing Chen, and Judith Degen. 2020. Harnessing the richness of the linguistic signal in predicting pragmatic inferences. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
Robert Stalnaker. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Milton K. Munitz and Peter K. Unger, editors, Semantics and Philosophy, pages 135-148. New York University Press.
Alex Wang, Amapreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel R Bowman. 2019. GLUE: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. In Proceedings of the Interantional Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
Alex Warstadt, Yu Cao, Ioana Grosu, Wei Peng, Hagen Blix, Yining Nie, Anna Alsop, Shikha Bordia, Haokun Liu, Alicia Parrish, Sheng-Fu Wang, Jason Phang, Anhad Mohananey, Phu Mon Htut, Paloma Jeretic, and Samuel R. Bowman. 2019a. Investigating BERT's knowledge of language: Five analysis methods with NPIs. In Proceedings of EMNLP-IJCNLP, pages 2870-2880.
Alex Warstadt, Alicia Parrish, Haokun Liu, Anhad Mohananey, Wei Peng, Sheng-Fu Wang, and Samuel R Bowman. 2019b. BLiMP: The benchmark of linguistic minimal pairs for English. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.00582.
Sean Welleck, Jason Weston, Arthur Szlam, and Kyunghyun Cho. 2019. Dialogue natural language inference. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 3731-3741, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Aaron Steven White, Pushpendre Rastogi, Kevin Duh, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2017. Inference is everything: Recasting semantic resources into a unified evaluation framework. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 996-1005, Taipei, Taiwan. Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing.
Aaron Steven White and Kyle Rawlins. 2018. The role of veridicality and factivity in clause selection. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Amherst, MA, USA. GLSA Publications.
Aaron Steven White, Rachel Rudinger, Kyle Rawlins, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2018. Lexicosyntactic inference in neural models. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 4717-4724, Brussels, Belgium. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Adina Williams, Nikita Nangia, and Samuel Bowman. 2018. A broad-coverage challenge corpus for sentence understanding through inference. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pages 1112–1122. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Hitomi Yanaka, Koji Mineshima, Daisuke Bekki, Kentaro Inui, Satoshi Sekine, Lasha Abzianidze, and Johan Bos. 2019a. Can neural networks understand monotonicity reasoning? In Proceedings of the 2019 ACL Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, pages 31-40, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Hitomi Yanaka, Koji Mineshima, Daisuke Bekki, Kentaro Inui, Satoshi Sekine, Lasha Abzianidze, and Johan Bos. 2019b. HELP: A dataset for identifying shortcomings of neural models in monotonicity reasoning. In Proceedings of the Eighth Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM* 2019), pages 250-255, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Annie Zaenen, Lauri Karttunen, and Richard Crouch. 2005. Local textual inference: Can it be defined or circumscribed? In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment, pages 31-36, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Rowan Zellers, Yonatan Bisk, Roy Schwartz, and Yejin Choi. 2018. SWAG: A large-scale adversarial dataset for grounded commonsense inference. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 93-104. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Rowan Zellers, Ari Holtzman, Yonatan Bisk, Ali Farhadi, and Yejin Choi. 2019. HellaSwag: Can a machine really finish your sentence? In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 4791-4800, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Sheng Zhang, Rachel Rudinger, Kevin Duh, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2017. Ordinal common-sense inference. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5:379-395.
Yukun Zhu, Ryan Kiros, Rich Zemel, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Raquel Urtasun, Antonio Torralba, and Sanja Fidler. 2015. Aligning books and movies: Towards story-like visual explanations by watching movies and reading books. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 19-27.
8702
Type	Premise	Hypothesis
Connectives	These cats or those fish appear.	These cats and those fish don’t both appear.
Determiners	Some skateboards tipped over.	Not all skateboards tipped over.
Numerals	Ten bananas were scorching.	One hundred bananas weren’t scorching.
Modals	Jerry could wake up.	Jerry didn’t need to wake up.
Scalar adjectives	Banks are fine.	Banks are not great.
Scalar verbs	Dawn went towards the hills.	Dawn did not get to the hills.
Table 4: The scalar implicature triggers in IMPPRES. Examples are automatically generated sentences pairs from each of the six datasets for the scalar implicatures experiment. The pairs belong to the "Implicature (+ to -)" condition.
Type	Premise (Trigger)	Hypothesis (Presupposition)
All N	All six roses that bloomed died.	Exactly six roses bloomed.
Both	Both flowers that bloomed died.	Exactly two flowers bloomed.
Change of State	The cat escaped.	The cat used to be captive.
Cleft Existence	It is Sandra who disliked Veronica.	Someone disliked Veronica.
Cleft Uniqueness	It is Sandra who disliked Veronica.	Exactly one person disliked Veronica.
Only	Only Lucille went to Spain.	Lucille went to Spain.
Possessed Definite	Bill's handyman won.	Bill has a handyman.
Question	Sue learned why Candice testified.	Candice testified.
Table 5: The presupposition triggers in IMPPRES. Examples are automatically generated sentences pairs from each of the eight datasets for the presupposition experiment. The pairs belong to the "Plain Trigger / Presupposition" condition.
8703
Figure 8: Results for the scalar implicatures triggered by adjectives, by target condition.
Figure 9: Results for the scalar implicatures triggered by adjectives, by target condition.
Figure 10: Results for the scalar implicatures triggered by determiners, by target condition.
Figure 12: Results for the scalar triggered by numerals, by target condition.
Figure 11: Results for the scalar implicatures triggered by modals, by target condition.
Figure 13: Results for the scalar implicatures triggered by verbs, by target condition.
8705