Silviase/jgov_v1.4_full_ann huggingface dataset:
リスク7:誤った情報を提供してしまうリスク、誤った相手に提供してしまうリスク
リスクに対する措置の内容
リスクへの対策は十分か	[ ]	<選択肢>1) 特に力を入れている3) 課題が残されている	2) 十分である
情報提供ネットワークシステムとの接続に伴うその他のリスク及びそのリスクに対する措置
7.特定個人情報の保管・消去
リスク1:特定個人情報の漏えい・滅失・毀損リスク
①NISC政府機関統一基準群	[4) 政府機関ではない]	<選択肢>1) 特に力を入れて遵守している3) 十分に遵守していない	2) 十分に遵守している4) 政府機関ではない
②安全管理体制	[ ]	<選択肢>1) 特に力を入れて整備している3) 十分に整備していない	2) 十分に整備している3) 十分に整備していない
③安全管理規程	[ ]	<選択肢>1) 特に力を入れて整備している3) 十分に整備していない	2) 十分に整備している3) 十分に整備していない
④安全管理体制・規程の職員への周知	[ ]	<選択肢>1) 特に力を入れて周知している3) 十分に周知していない	2) 十分に周知している3) 十分に周知していない
⑤物理的対策	[ ]	<選択肢>1) 特に力を入れて行っている3) 十分に行っていない	2) 十分に行っている3) 十分に行っている
具体的な対策の内容	【記載例】·都道府県サーバの集約センターにおいて、監視カメラを設置してサーバ設置場所への入退室者を特定し、管理する。·都道府県サーバの集約センターにおいては、サーバ設置場所、記録媒体の保管場所を施錠管理する。·都道府県においては、端末設置場所、記録媒体の保管場所を施錠管理する。
⑥技術的対策	[ ]	<選択肢>1) 特に力を入れて行っている3) 十分に行っていない	2) 十分に行っている3) 十分に行っている
具体的な対策の内容	【記載例】·ウイルス対策ソフトの定期的パターン更新を行う。·庁内のネットワークにおいて、ファイアウォール（ほかに侵入検知システム（IDS）/侵入防御システム（IPS）の導入を予定している場合は追記する。）を導入する。·都道府県サーバの集約センターにおいて、ファイアウォールを導入し、ログの解析を行う。
⑦バックアップ	[ ]	<選択肢>1) 特に力を入れて行っている3) 十分に行っている3) 十分に行っている	2) 十分に行っている3) 十分に行っている
⑧事故発生時手順の策定・周知	[ ]	<選択肢>1) 特に力を入れて行っている3) 十分に行っている3) 十分に行っている	2) 十分に行っている3) 十分に行っている
⑨過去3年以内に、評価実施機関において、個人情報に関する重大事故が発生したか	[ ]	<選択肢>1) 発生あり	2) 発生なし
その内容
再発防止策の内容
⑩死者の個人番号	[1) 保管している]	<選択肢>1) 保管している	2) 保管していない
具体的な保管方法	生存する個人の個人番号とともに、死亡による消除後、住基法施行令第30条の6（都道府県における本人確認情報の保存期間）に定める期間（150年間）保管する。
その他の措置の内容
リスクへの対策は十分か	[ ]	<選択肢>1) 特に力を入れている3) 课题が残されている	2) 十分である
リスク2:特定個人情報が古い情報のまま保管され続けるリスク
リスクに対する措置の内容	【記載例】市町村の住民基本台帳で本人確認情報の変更があった場合には住基ネットを通して本人確認情報の更新が行われる仕組みとなっているため、古い情報のまま保管されることはない。また、市町村CSとの整合処理を定期的に実施し、保存する本人確認情報が最新であるかどうかを確認する。
リスクへの対策は十分か	[ ]	<選択肢>1) 特に力を入れている2) 十分である3) 課題が残されている
リスク3:特定個人情報が消去されずいつまでも存在するリスク
消去手順	[ ]	<選択肢>1) 定めている2) 定めていない
手順の内容	【記載例】·住民票の記載の修正前の本人確認情報（履歴情報）及び消除者の本人確認情報は法令（住基法施行令第30条の6）に定める保存期間を経過した後にシステムに消去する。·磁気ディスクの廃棄時は、要領・手順書等に基づき、内容の消去、破壊等を行うとともに、磁気ディスク管理簿にその記録を残す。また、専用ソフトによるフォーマット、物理的粉砕等を行うことにより、内容を読み出すことができないようにする。·帳票については、要領・手順書等に基づき、帳票管理簿等を作成し、受渡し、保管及び廃棄の運用が適切になされていることを適時確認するとともに、その記録を残す。廃棄時には、要領・手順書等に基づき、裁断、溶解等を行うとともに、帳票管理簿等にその記録を残す。
その他の措置の内容	-
リスクへの対策は十分か	[ ]	<選択肢>1) 特に力を入れている2) 十分である3) 課題が残されている
特定個人情報の保管・消去におけるその他のリスク及びそのリスクに対する措置
Ⅳ その他のリスク対策 ※

1. 監査
①自己点検	[ ]
具体的なチェック方法	【記載例】年に1回、担当部署内において実施している自己点検に用いるチェック項目に、「評価書の記載内容通りの運用がなされていること」に係る内容を追加し、運用状況を確認する。
②監査	[ ]
具体的な内容	【記載例】·内部監査年に1回、組織内に置かれた監査担当により、以下の観点による自己監査を実施し、監査結果を踏まえて体制や規定を改善する。·評価書記載事項と運用実態のチェック·個人情報保護に関する規定、体制整備·個人情報保護に関する人的安全管理措置·職員の役割責任の明確化、安全管理措置の周知·教育·個人情報保護に関する技術的安全管理措置·外部監査民間機関等より調達する外部監査事業者による監査を実施し、監査結果を踏まえて体制や規定を改善する。
2. 従業者に対する教育·啓発
従業者に対する教育·啓発	[ ]
具体的な方法	【記載例】·住基ネット関係職員(任用された派遣要員、非常勤職員、臨時職員等を含む。)に対して、初任時及び一定期間毎に、必要な知識の習得に資するための研修を実施するとともに、その記録を残す。·住基ネットの各責任者に対して、その管理に関する必要な知識や技術を習得させる研修を実施するとともに、その記録を残す。
3. その他のリスク対策
V 開示請求、問合せ

1.特定個人情報の開示・訂正・利用停止請求
①請求先
②請求方法
特記事項
③手数料等	[ ]	<選択肢>
1) 有料	2) 無料
④個人情報ファイル簿の公表	[ ]	<選択肢>
1) 行っている	2) 行っていない
個人情報ファイル名
公表場所
⑤法令による特別の手続
⑥個人情報ファイル簿への不記載等
2.特定個人情報ファイルの取扱いに関する問い合わせ
①連絡先
②対応方法

VI 評価実施手続

1.基礎項目評価
①実施日
②しきい値判断結果	[ ]
<選択肢>
1)基礎項目評価及び全項目評価の実施が義務付けられる。
2)基礎項目評価及び重点項目評価の実施が義務付けられる(任意に全項目評価を実施)。
3)基礎項目評価の実施が義務付けられる(任意に全項目評価を実施)。
4)特定個人情報保護評価の実施が義務付けられない(任意に全項目評価を実施)。
2.国民・住民等からの意見の聴取
①方法
②実施日・期間
③期間を短縮する特段の理由
④主な意見の内容
⑤評価書への反映
3.第三者点検
①実施日
②方法
③結果
4.特定個人情報保護委員会の承認【行政機関等のみ】
①提出日	-
②特定個人情報保護委員会による審査	-
秘農林水産省

# 畜 產 統 計 調 查 採 卵 鶏 調 查 票

(平成25年2月1日現在)

統計法に基づく国の統計調査です。調査票情報の秘密の保護に万全を期します。

【職員記入欄】（この項目は農林水産省の職員が記入します。）

調査年	都道府県	地域センター等	市区町村	整理番号	抽出階層
基本指標番号	☑☑☑☑☑☑	☑☑☑	☑☑☑	☑☑☑☑	☑☑☑☑☑	☑☑☑☑☑☑

4641

## << 記入に当たっては、以下のことに注意してください >>

☐ 記入は、黒の鉛筆又はシャープペンシルを使用してください。

☐ で囲まれた記入欄は集計項目ですので、必ず記入してください。

ご記入に当たっては記入見本を参考に、数字は枠からはみ出さないように、また、

○印は点線に沿うように記入してください。

記入見本 0123456789 ① ② ③

で囲まれた記入欄は補助欄ですので、必ずしも記入の必要はありませんが、飼養実態を調査票に正しくご記入いただくために活用してください。

調査や調査票の記入の仕方などに関するお問い合わせは、

裏面の「連絡先」までお問い合わせください。

## 1 飼養羽数

2月1日現在で飼っている羽数を100羽単位で記入してください。

以降の「2 経営組織」及び「3 ひなの導入」の項目については、学校、畜産試験場等の非営利飼養者の方は記入不要です。

## 2 經營組織

該当する経営組織の番号を一つ選択し、点線に沿ってので囲んでください。

経営組織
農家	会社	その他
(6)	(7)	(8)
番号	(1)	(2)	(3)

## ひなの導入

過去1年間のひなの導入状況について、該当する番号を一つ選択し、点線に沿ってぴって囲んでください。

ひなの導入あり	ひなの導入無し
初生びなのみ	大・中びなのみ	初生びな大・中びなの両方
(9)	(10)	(11)	(12)
①	②	③	④

ひなの導入がある場合（上記1～3のいずれかに〇印）は、過去1年間の導入羽数を100羽単位で記入してください。

初 生 び な	(13)	:	:	:	:	:	0	0
大・中びな	(14)	:	:	:	:	:	0	0

◎ 調査にご協力いただき、大変ありがとうございました。

調査事項はここまでですが、お手数でなければ裏面の【記事欄】にもご記入願います。
【記事欄】

差支えなければ、飼養羽数の増減理由等についてご記入願います。

【連絡先】
WHITE PAPER ON LAND, INFRASTRUCTURE, TRANSPORT AND TOURISM IN JAPAN, 2011

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
WHITE PAPER ON LAND, INFRASTRUCTURE, TRANSPORT, AND TOURISM IN JAPAN, 2011

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism (MLIT)

## Contents

Part I : The shifts in the government's national land and transportation administration through reconstruction - Sustainable vigorous development of the national land and regions
Preface ..... 1
Chapter 1: Reconstruction from the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami, and shifts in the administration of land, infrastructure, transport and tourism ..... 2
Chapter 2: Promoting sustainable, vigorous development of the national land and regions ..... 71
Our experience with the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami (hereinafter called “the Disaster”) has changed “the shape” of our nation.

The extent of damage caused by the tsunami far exceeded our estimate and the devastating scene was shown not only throughout Japan but also around the world through media coverage and footage. This experience will certainly change public awareness and behavior in terms of disaster preparedness. In addition, the accident at the nuclear power plant will certainly change our energy policy and approaches taken to date.

Amid such changes in social structure as population decline, aging, and fiscal restraints as well as the need to deal with climate change and global environmental problems, the question is how we should promote building a sustainable, vigorous homeland and regions. Even though we have continually reviewed our methods, ideas, and initiatives for building homeland and communities, we need to recognize anew the most important mission of developing social infrastructure, which is “protecting public safety and security,” while working to reconstruct the areas afflicted by the Disaster. At the same time, we need to tackle such difficult issues as energy restraints that surfaced after the Disaster with a view to “building a sustainable, vigorous homeland and communities.”

Under the circumstances, in this edition of WHITE PAPER ON LAND, INFRASTRUCTURE, TRANSPORT, AND TOURISM IN JAPAN, we have decided to discuss “Shifts in the policies of land, infrastructure, transport, and tourism” in Section 1 of Part I. Planning reconstruction of the disaster areas will serve as a test on how we can promote building a sustainable, vigorous homeland and communities throughout Japan union is faced with population decline, aging, fiscal restraint, energy constraint, and natural disaster risks. With this recognition, in Section 2 we will cover specific directions of measures and policies as well as current approaches aimed at “building a sustainable, vigorous homeland and communities” that extend vertically (actual onsite work through policy making), horizontally (diversity of fields), and externally (cooperation with other ministries and agencies), for which MLIT’s onsite abilities, comprehensive power, and readiness will be maximized.

Then in Part II, developments in the policies of land, infrastructure, transport, and tourism in various fields are reported for each policy issue.
Note : No. of net outflow of people recorded Source: Chart developed by MLIT from the "Report on demographic shift of the Basic Resident Register" by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications

The net inflow and outflow of people in the three Prefectures during 2011 broken down by age bracket show that the outflow of young people in their 20’s sharply increased in Miyagi Prefecture, and the outflow of people aged between 0 through 14 and those aged between 25 through 44 sharply rose in Fukushima Prefecture. Iwate Prefecture shows a high number of outflowing people aged between 15 and 24 but this is a trend noted even prior to the Disaster.

Chart. 4 Net outflow of people by five-year age bracket

Source:Chart developed by MLIT from the “Report on demographic shift of the Basic Resident Register” by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications
Ibaraki: Developed by MLIT from Population and household estimate of Ibaraki Prefecture.

A closer look at the situations of Iwate, Miyagi, and Fukushima shows that while the population continued to decrease in coastal areas hit hard by the tsunami, the population increased in Morioka City and Sendai City (up 7,080 people in Sendai and up 1,349 in Morioka between March 2011 and February 2012). It is presumed that some of the disaster victims from affected coastal areas and Fukushima Prefecture have moved to core cities and their vicinities of the two Prefectures.

In the case of Chiba Prefecture, the net outflow of people- particularly from parts of the Keiyo area along Tokyo Bay hit hard by the liquefaction – occurred in 2011 for the first time in the 55 years since 1956. In Ibaraki Prefecture, which was also damaged by the liquefaction, the net outflow of people occurred for the first time in the three years since 2008.

Miyagi: Population estimate by municipality unit (monthly)

Fukushima: Monthly survey report of current population

Chiba: Monthly survey report of population

(Production is generally on a recovery path but still stagnated in some sectors)

In the Tohoku region, the economy is still in a harsh condition due to adverse effects of the Disaster but is gradually recovering. Mining and manufacturing output in the region sharply dropped after the Disaster as compared with other regions, and while it is still below the pre-Disaster level, a gradual upward trend is seen, supported by such factors as moves to make up for reduced output after the Disaster and rebuilding of industries afflicted by the Disaster. The transportation equipment industry experienced a sharp drop nationwide mainly due to the effects of disrupted automotive supply chains but in June 2011, the industries in the affected areas rebounded to the pre-Disaster level ahead of those in other parts of the country. The steel industry and the pulp, paper, and paper processing industries, whose production activities were halted just after the Disaster, have started to show signs of recovery with the restoration of their production equipment situated along the Pacific seacoast. However, production levels of the food and tobacco industries still remain low.
### Chart. 6 Changes in mining and manufacturing output indexes in the Tohoku region

Note: “The Tohoku region” denotes the six prefectures of Aomori, Iwate, Miyagi, Akita, Yamagata, and Fukushima.

Source: Chart developed by MLIT based on data of METI

## Column Estimate of damage caused by the Disaster

Negative effects on production activities caused by the Disaster were not confined to the affected areas but spread nationwide. MLIT developed a region-by-region estimate on spillover effects due to reduction of capital income (flow income gained from capital stock that equals to sum of operating excess and allocation of capital depletion on the industry –related chart) caused by the Disaster in an economic model based on certain assumptions.

Fig. 1 Estimate results of damage (gross regional product)

The results show that in terms of gross regional product, there was a nationwide decrease of some ¥1.25 trillion (down 0.25%) and broken down by prefecture, significant decreases were noted in the order of Miyagi, Iwate, Fukushima, Ibaraki, and Chiba. By area, the coastal areas of Iwate Prefecture (down ¥322.2 billion or some 48%) registered the largest loss, followed by the inland areas of Miyagi Prefecture (down ¥313.9 billion or some 10%) and the southern coastal areas of Miyagi Prefecture (¥234.5 billion or some 6%) (See Fig. 1). Except the affected areas (Iwate, Miyagi, Fukushima, and Chiba Prefectures, for
which the rates of damage are calculated in this estimate), other areas show positive results due to substitution effects and other factors, but when only the effects of reduced intermediate input from the affected areas are picked out, it is noted that difficulties in securing parts on account of so-called disrupted supply chains have had negative effects nationwide (See Fig 2).

Furthermore, the level of per-capita real income has dropped in all the regions (See Fig. 3), which indicates that effects of the Disaster have spread to households throughout the country.

This estimate assumes that some capital was lost and does not take into account effects of the loss of social capital stock. But if a mega quake or such should hit the metropolitan area where economic functions are concentrated, there will be larger impacts affecting the entire country. Against a possible large-scale disaster in the future, a comprehensive approach to mitigate effects on loss of stock on a national level is necessary.

(Notes on this estimate)

-Since this estimate only calculates economic effects of the case where the decrease in capital income due to the Disaster is not recovered for one year, no consideration is given to the effects of implementation of reconstruction-related projects, effects of the nuclear power plant accident and relevant harmful rumors, changes in economic conditions after the Disaster (effects of the Thai flood on the automotive and other industries, negative effects of appreciated yen on exports, etc.)

-This estimate assumes that areas other than those for which the rates of damage to make the basis for calculating decrease in capital income have been computed (particularly such areas as Hokkaido, Aomori, Tochigi, Saitama, Niigata and Nagano, which are included in the special reconstruction zone) have not experienced decrease in capital income.

-Consequently, the estimate tends to show smaller effects of the Disaster, which may differ from perceptions prevailing in the affected areas.
## (Consumption trending upward, partly with positive effects from Disaster-related demand)

Consumption has continued to rise partly due to the special demand related to recovery and reconstruction from the Disaster and has recovered to the pre-Disaster level. Large retail stores (department stores and supermarkets) in the affected areas are doing better than the previous year and the national average, thanks to brisk sales of clothing and foodstuffs. Likewise, convenience stores are performing better than the previous year and the national average, spurred by demand from supporters of reconstruction efforts.

Chart. 7 Changes in personal consumption in the Tohoku region

Note: "The Tohoku region" denotes the six prefectures of Aomori, Iwate, Miyagi, Akita, Yamagata, and Fukushima.

Source: Chart developed by MLIT based on “Commercial Sales Statistics” of METI

Also in terms of passenger cars, it is estimated that 146,000 cars in Miyagi, 40,000 in Iwate, and 50,000 in Fukushima were lost to the tsunami but replacement demand attributable to the Disaster has pushed car sales above the previous year.

Chart. 8 Numbers of new cars sold and used cars registered in Iwate, Miyagi, and Fukushima Prefectures

## (Sharp increase in public investment)

Construction investment in fiscal 2011 $ ^{Note} $ is estimated at ¥41.99 trillion and that in fiscal 2012 is estimated at ¥45.31 trillion. Out of these amounts, ¥4.52 trillion in fiscal 2011 and ¥5.87 trillion in 2012 are expected to be invested in the Tohoku region. Public works (on a contract-amount basis) of the three Tohoku prefectures remain at a higher level than the same month of the previous year with the contribution of recovery and reconstruction demand. MLIT expects that thanks to the construction investment related to recovery and reconstruction from the Disaster in the Tohoku region, some 174,000 jobs in 2011 and 498,000 jobs in 2012 will be created.

Source: Chart developed by MLIT based on “Statistical Information of Automobile Registration” of Japan Automobile Dealers Association

Chart.9 Changes in construction investment amounts

Note: Construction investment amounts of Tohoku are estimated through allocating construction investment estimates by the regional performance rate of overall construction statistics.

For 2011, construction investment amounts related to the recovery and reconstruction from the Disaster of the Tohoku region are estimated based on the regional performance rate of the 2011 overall construction statistics. For 2012, construction investment amounts related to the recovery and reconstruction from the Disaster of the Tohoku region were forecasted based on the regional performance rate of the 2011 overall construction statistics and on the budget status.

Source: MLIT
Chart. 10 Contract amounts of public works

Source: Chart developed by MLIT based on construction guarantee data of Hokkaido and such data of East Japan and West Japan

## (Housing starts rebounding)

Housing starts in the three prefectures of Tohoku dipped below the same month of the previous year right after the Disaster but then have begun to rebound.

Chart. 11 Housing starts

Source: “Statistical Survey of Construction Starts” (monthly) of MLIT
(Private investments for reconstruction also looking up)

Supported mainly by demand related to recovery and reconstruction, other private investments have become robust as well. Contract amounts of private-sector civil engineering works in the three prefectures of Tohoku are hovering at a higher level than the same month of the previous year.

#### Chart. 12 Contract amounts of civil engineering works, etc., received from the private sector, etc

Source: “Statistical Survey of Construction Starts” (monthly) of MLIT

In addition, construction of such non-residential buildings as offices and warehouses is also brisk and is on a higher level, compared with the same month of the previous year.

### Chart. 13 Floor space of non-residential buildings started

Source: “Statistical Survey of Construction Starts” (monthly) of MLIT
(Employment improving but mismatch noted)

The effective jobs-to-applicants ratios of the three Tohoku prefectures dropped right after the Disaster but have started to rise with more job openings available due to increased demand for Disaster-related construction projects as opposed to fewer job applicants.

However, in Miyagi Prefecture, for example, while there are such high jobs-to-applicants ratios in the construction and other industries as 6.84 (structure construction) and 11.04 (security guards, etc.), in industries on a recovery path as 1.42 (metal processing) and 1.09 (transportation machinery), the ratio in food manufacturing, an important local industry, remains at 0.50, which is lower than the national average and the mismatch between available jobs and applicants is noted.

### Chart. 14 Changes in effective jobs-to-applicants ratios (seasonally adjusted) (The three Tohoku prefectures and national average)

Source: Chart developed by MLIT based on “Occupational Stability Statistics” of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

Chart. 15 Effective jobs-to-applicants ratios (structure construction, security, metal processing, transportation machinery and food manufacturing)

Note : The jobs-to-applicants ratio of structure construction of Miyagi for March of 2011 is not available as the classification has “construction and civil engineering works” combined.

Source: Chart developed by MLIT based on “Occupational Stability Statistics” of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and “Balance between jobs and applicants by job-placement office of Sendai Labour Bureau
(Transportation on a recovery track)

Trucking in the three prefectures of Tohoku dipped sharply due to disrupted infrastructures and supply chains but quantities transported are on the rise along with the progress in recovery and reconstruction.

Furthermore, compared with recovery in general cargoes, which reflect activities of local businesses $ ^{note1} $ , that in special less-than-truckload cargoes (LTL) $ ^{note2} $ , most of which are home delivery items, is faster, with the latter hovering around the normal level since May 2011.

Quantities of cargoes handled at seaports sharply dropped on the Pacific Ocean side due to the Disaster, etc., but rebounded with the recovery of the ports and have exceeded the same month of the previous year since October

### Chart. 16 Changes in trucking (three Tohoku prefectures and National Total)

Changes in LTL and general cargoes (GC) (National Total and three Tohoku prefectures.)

Note :Tohoku statistics obtained through interviews with seven carriers of LTL and 21 carriers of GC.

Source :Trucking Information

2011. At the Sendai- Shiota Port, an international hub port, the number of containers handled nosedived to zero, but some recovery was noted after June 2011, when parts of the port facilities became available for use, and the handling level in December 2011 rose to 13,031 TEU $ ^{note3} $ or approximately 70% of the previous year. Ports along the Japan Sea (in Akita and Yamagata Prefectures) saw a huge increase in cargo handling as they were used for alternate routing of transportation of the Pacific Ocean side (Aomori, Iwate, Miyagi, Fukushima, and Ibaraki).

Chart. 17 Changes in cargo quantities handled in the Tohoku region

Note: 1 Pacific coast figures represent the combined total of Aomori (Port of Hachinohe), Miyagi (Ports of Ishinomaki & Sendai-Shiogama), Fukushima (Ports of Soma & Onahama) and Ibaraki (Port of Ibaraki Port of Kashima). Japan Sea coast figures represent the combined total of Akita (Ports of Noshiro, Funagawa & Akita) and Yamagata (Port of Sakata).

2 Figures for the Port of Soma during Jan & Feb are unreported.

3 Figures for the Iwate (Ports of Kuji, Miyako, Kamaishi & Ofunato) are excluded since post-Disaster data of Kamaishi and Ofunato are unreported.

Source: "Ports Survey" of MLIT

Chart. 18 Changes in the number of containers handled at the Port of Sendai-Shiogama

As for air cargo transport, Sendai Airport saw a sharp drop after the Disaster and even though it has been on a recovery path since August 2011, the pace of recovery is slow with the cargo handling there remaining at approximately 50% of the same month of the previous year.

In terms of air travelers, again Sendai Airport experienced a sharp decline after the Disaster, but the number of travelers bottomed out in April 2011 and has risen to the pre-Disaster level of year 2000. Also at other airports, the number has recovered to the pre-Disaster level.