Silviase/jgov_v1.4_full_ann huggingface dataset:
Did families with more children spend more than families with less children?

Table 1:

Independent Variable: Coupon Income/Annual Income

Dependent Variable:	log Consumption (relative to February)
March	April	May	June	July
A: Overlapping panels
Total	0.12	0.11	-0.05	-0.35	-0.24
(except durables)	(0.15)	(0.17)	(0.19)	(0.24)	(0.36)
N	25,422	20,555	15,700	10,850	5,471
Semi-durables	1.29	1.13	-0.33	-0.57	-0.23
(0.59)	(0.66)	(0.74)	(0.91)	(1.36)
N	24,362	19,679	15,063	10,428	5,232
Non-durables	0.19	0.01	-0.06	-0.21	0.12
(0.10)	(0.11)	(0.13)	(0.17)	(0.26)
N	25,583	20,663	15,780	10,887	5,497
Services	-0.20	-0.01	-0.16	-0.14	-0.31
(0.29)	(0.32)	(0.36)	(0.44)	(0.67)
N	25,415	20,522	15,682	10,813	5,457
B: February-July panel
Total	0.18	0.27	0.23	-0.11	-0.24
(except durables)	(0.35)	(0.35)	(0.32)	(0.34)	(0.36)
N	5,466	5,458	5,460	5,458	5,471
Semi-Durables	2.53	3.13	1.62	0.10	-0.23
(1.33)	(1.30)	(1.28)	(1.28)	(1.36)
N	5,232	5,232	5,232	5,247	5,232

Notes: Dependent variable is the log of consumption in a month starting in March relative to consumption in February. Estimates are coefficients on Coupon/Income. Other independent variables are a quadratic in the age of the household head, the number of children under the age of 15, the number of other family members, and indicator variables for year. The data in Panel A are the FIES panels from 1990 through 1999 covering October–March, November–April, December–May, January–June, and February–July. The data in Panel B (February–July panel) are FIES panels from 1990 through 1999 covering February–July. The implied MPC for semi-durables (after correcting for attenuation bias) are 0.26 (0.12) in March and 0.09 (0.05) in April in panel A. For Panel B, the implied attenuation corrected MPCs are 0.52 (0.27) in March and 0.24 (0.10) in April (standard errors in parentheses).
Table 2:

Did families with more children spend more in the long run?

Independent Variable: Coupon Income/Annual Income

Dependent Variable:	log Consumption (relative to February)
March	March-April	March-May	March-June	March-July
Total (except durables)	0.18	0.27	0.35	0.23	0.09
(0.35)	(0.31)	(0.29)	(0.28)	(0.28)
N	5,466	5,465	5,468	5,461	5,472
Semi-Durables	2.53	2.71	2.47	1.90	1.49
(1.33)	(1.17)	(1.11)	(1.08)	(1.07)
N	5,232	5,296	5,311	5,313	5,317
Non-durables	0.21	0.22	0.20	0.13	0.12
(0.23)	(0.19)	(0.19)	(0.19)	(0.19)
N	5,480	5,477	5,478	5,475	5,485
Services	0.11	-0.19	0.02	0.26	-0.10
(0.65)	(0.58)	(0.56)	(0.54)	(0.53)
N	5,457	5,458	5,464	5,453	5,459

Notes: Dependent variable is the log of average consumption starting in March relative to consumption in February. Estimates are coefficients on Coupon/Income. Other independent variables are a quadratic in the age of the household head, the number of children under the age of 15, the number of other family members, and indicator variables for year. The data are FIES panels from 1990 through 1999 covering February–July.
Did families with more children spend more than families with less children?

Table 3:

Independent Variable: # Children < 15

Dependent Variable:	log Consumption (relative to February)
March	April	May	June	July
A: Overlapping panels
Total	0.01	0.003	-0.003	-0.02	0.01
(except durables)	(0.01)	(0.008)	(0.009)	(0.01)	(0.02)
N	25,422	20,555	15,700	10,850	5,471
Semi-durables	0.05	0.04	-0.01	-0.03	0.01
(0.03)	(0.03)	(0.03)	(0.04)	(0.06)
N	24,362	19,679	15,063	10,428	5,232
Non-durables	0.006	-0.0005	-0.01	-0.02	-0.001
(0.005)	(0.005)	(0.01)	(0.01)	(0.01)
N	25,583	20,663	15,780	10,887	5,497
Services	0.01	-0.001	-0.01	-0.01	0.02
(0.01)	(0.02)	(0.02)	(0.02)	(0.03)
N	25,415	20,522	15,682	10,813	5,457
B: February-July panel
Total	0.01	0.01	0.01	-0.01	0.01
(except durables)	(0.02)	(0.02)	(0.02)	(0.02)	(0.02)
N	5,466	5,458	5,460	5,458	5,471
Semi-Durables	0.09	0.12	0.06	-0.001	0.01
(0.06)	(0.06)	(0.06)	(0.06)	(0.06)
N	5,253	5,230	5,232	5,247	5,232

Notes: Dependent variable is the log of consumption in a month starting in March relative to consumption in February. Estimates are coefficients on product of number of children under age 15 and an indicator variable for 1999. Other independent variables are a quadratic in the age of the household head, number of children under the age of 15, the number of other family members, and indicator variables for year. The data in Panel A are the FIES panels from 1990 through 1999 covering October–March, November–April, December–May, January–June, and February–July. The data in Panel B (February–July panel) are FIES panels from 1990 through 1999 covering February–July.
Table 4: Did the coupons have a larger effect in poor families? Independent Variable: Coupon Income/Annual Income

A: Assets/Income
> =mean	< mean	>= 1	< 1	>=1/2	< 1/2
Semi-durables	2.11(2.25)	2.73(1.60)	1.38(2.26)	3.10(1.60)	1.60(1.97)	3.45(1.75)
N	1,644	2,981	1,674	2.951	2,610	2,015
B: (Assets + Income)/Consumption
>= mean	< mean	>=50	< 50	>=80	< 80
Semi-durables	-0.51(2.91)	2.85(1.48)	-1.39(4.91)	2.70(1.37)	-6.36(8.08)	2.88(1.32)
N	1,502	3,123	739	3,886	349	4,276

Note: Dependent variable is log of spending on semi-durables in March relative to February. Entries are coefficients on Coupons/Income. Other independent variables are a quadratic in the age of the household head, the number of children under the age of 15, the number of other family members, and indicator variables for each year. Assets are defined as gross financial assets, income is average monthly income in previous year, and consumption is average consumption (over the six months). The sample is the matched panel of the FIES and FSS from 1990 to 1999. Standard errors in parentheses.
Table 5:

Did larger families spend more when the coupon program was announced?

## I ndependent Variable: Coupon Income/Annual Income

Dependent variable: $ \log $ Consumption (relative to October)
Nov.	Nov.-Dec.	Nov.-Jan.	Nov.-Feb.
Semi-durables	0.08	-0.82	0.47	-0.74
(0.54)	(0.56)	(0.69)	(0.87)
N	27,159	21,872	14,603	9,582

Note: Dependent variable is the log of consumption in a month starting in November relative to consumption in October. Entries are coefficients on Coupons/Income. Other independent variables are a quadratic in the age of the household head, the number of children under the age of 15, the number of other family members, and indicator variables for each year. The sample are FIES panels from 1990 through 1999 covering June–November, July–December, August–January, and September–February. Standard errors in parentheses.
Table 6:

Did retail sales increase in prefectures where more people received coupons?

Independent Variable: Coupons in Prefecture x 20,000 Yen/Prefecture GDP

Dependent variable:	log retail sales (relative to February)
March	April	May	June	July
Retail sales	1.47	1.80	1.92	2.88	2.73
1.	(0.98)	(0.98)	(1.14)	(1.11)	(1.32)
2.	Clot	1.99	1.43	0.49	4.10
hing and	(1.19)	(1.19)	(1.32)	(1.26)	(1.38)
Apparel

Notes: The unit of observation is a prefecture (47 prefectures in total). The dependent variable is the log of the ratio of retail sale in a prefecture in a month starting in March to retail sales in February. Entries are coefficients on ratio of the product of the number of coupon recipients and 20,000 yen in the prefecture to average monthly regional GDP in the previous year (standard errors in parentheses). Regressions also include indicator variables for prefecture and year. The MPC corrected for the timing of coupons distribution is 0.35 (0.23) in March, 0.14 (0.08) in April, 0.11 (0.07) in May, 0.15 (0.06) in June, and 0.14 (0.07) in July (standard errors in parentheses).
## Appendix Table 1:

Household consumption, income and demographics (FIES Panels, 1990-1999)

February	March	April	May	June	July
Consumption:
Semi-durables	28,602	40,470	33,817	31,386	31,812	37,084
(47,420)	(55,716)	(44,745)	(41,787)	(43,000)	(48,000)
Non-durables	104,153	113,281	106,589	108,015	103,709	109,718
(39,932)	(41,321)	(39,000)	(36,681)	(38,842)	(40,721)
Services	104,644	123,304	123,835	112,165	108,802	121,220
(120,681)	(153,373)	(154,225)	(124,803)	(137,233)	(132,211)
Total (Except durables)	236,494	275,768	262,885	250,662	243,283	266,552
(144,565)	(183,130)	(178,244)	(148,649)	(156,774)	(161,759)
Monthly income	611,668	611,033	610,986	612,889	612,384	607,468
(266,351)	(266,090)	(267,149)	(268,994)	(269,068)	(267,803)
Age (household head)	43.78	43.78	43.77	43.78	43.83	43.88
(10.00)	(10.00)	(10.02)	(9.99)	(10.00)	(10.03)
Number of children under 15	0.99	0.99	0.99	0.99	0.99	0.99
(1.04)	(1.04)	(1.04)	(1.04)	(1.04)	(1.04)
Number of other family members	2.50	2.50	2.49	2.50	2.49	2.51
(0.76)	(0.76)	(0.76)	(0.76)	(0.75)	(0.77)
Number of observations	25,827	25,827	20,899	15,950	11,002	5,546

Notes: The unit of observation is a household. Consumption and income are in yen at 2000 prices. Monthly income is pretax annual income divided by 12.
Appendix Table 2: Aggregate sales in prefectures (Survey of Commerce: 1990-1999)

Retail Sales	Clothing Sales
October	38,516	16,476
(59,258)	(26,751)
November	38,388	15,892
(59,633)	(25,299)
December	57,749	20,945
(89,460)	(32,653)
January	39,186	16,901
(55,086)	(24,733)
February	32,132	11,665
(47,781)	(17,804)
March	40,467	16,724
(62,178)	(26,592)
April	37,577	15,031
(56,109)	(23,539)
May	37,617	15,180
(56,516)	(23,910)
June	37,175	14,593
(57,453)	(23,065)
July	45,787	16,793
(70,766)	(26,483)
Item:
Average monthly income	688,630
(778,073)
Total coupons/Monthly income (%)	2.25
(0.51)
Retail sales/Monthly income (%)	5.10
(1.31)

Note: Unit of observation is a prefecture. Monthly income and retail sales are in million yen. Total coupon income is product of the number of coupons distributed in a prefecture and 20,000 yen. Monthly income is average of annual prefectural GDP from 1990 through 1999 divided by 12.
Figure 1: Timing of Receipt and Expenditure of Coupon (EPA Survey)

Panel A: Households with Children under age 15

Panel B: Households with Elderly Members

Source: Economic Planning Agency (1999)
## Local Employment Measures

Overview

## Outline of FY2013 Local Employment Measures

## Creation of employment in regions with severe employment situation

Support in accordance with the Act on Promotion of Job Opportunities in Certain Regions (enforced on August 4, 2009)

★ The government is providing support to the following types of regions

[Prefectures or municipalities formulate plans] → [The government provides approval] → [Local support measures prescribed in the plans are implemented]

■ Support for employment development promotion regions

(regions where the employment situation is extremely severe)

• Subsidy for promoting development of local employment

(₹11.43 billion)

* Created by integrating former subsidy to promote employment of local job seekers and subsidy for establishing small- and medium-sized enterprises to contribute to local revitalization (FY2013). The budget amount includes transitional measures portion.

■ Support for voluntary employment creation regions (regions highly motivated to create employment)

• Practical local employment creation projects

(Former name: Local employment creation promotion projects)

(¥7.02 billion)

• Local employment creation realization projects (¥0.31 billion)

## Support for other regions in need of employment development

■ Support for prefectures where the employment situation is severe or is not improving as expected

• Projects for creating employment in strategic industries (¥4.1 billion)

## Employment Creation Fund in consideration of worsening employment/unemployment situation

• Projects on employment creation in priority areas (¥881 billion)

• Business startup support type local job creation projects (¥100 billion)

## Measures for Okinawa

• Subsidy for promoting employment of young people in Okinawa (¥0.28 billion)

• Adaptation support projects for early job leavers in Okinawa

(¥0.02 billion)

## Measures for seasonal workers

• Subsidy for promoting year-round employment (¥4.98 billion)

• Subsidy for promoting trial employment (¥0.002 billion)

• Projects involving the promotion of year-round employment of seasonal workers (¥1.07 billion)

## Measures for people wishing to return to Fukushima

• Employment support projects for Fukushima evacuees returning, etc. (¥0.73 billion)

Measures for U/I-turn phenomenon

• Local employment seekers

activation projects (¥0.1 billion)
## Overview

## Outline of Employment Insurance System

1. Employment Insurance is an obligatory insurance managed by the government (the insurance compulsorily applies to any enterprise which employs more than one worker in principle.)

[Covered establishments: 2.06 million, insured workers: 39.01 million, beneficiaries: 0.63 million (FY2012 average)]

2. Employment insurance is a system which has comprehensive employment-related functions. It does

[1] grant benefits to the unemployed, to workers having difficulty continuing their employment, and to workers and the unemployed who voluntarily receive vocational training, with the aim of stabilizing their well-being and employment or promoting reemployment, and

[2] aim to prevent unemployment, rectify the employment situation and increase employment opportunities, develop and improve workers' potential, and promote the welfare of workers.

## Outline of Employment Insurance System
FY2009	FY2010	FY2011	FY2012 (budget)	FY2013 (budget)
Revenue	20,508	20,467	20,919	17,903	18,179
Premium revenue (included)	12,790	17,858	18,658	15,572	16,145
State subsidy for unemployment benefits, etc. (included)	5,887	702	1,281	1,705	1,663
State subsidy for employment support projects (included)	-	-	167	361	160
Expenditure	22,481	18,221	17,946	21,217	20,222
(Unemployment benefits (included))	19,805	16,616	16,543	17,790	17,514
(Employment support project (included))	-	-	110	1,479	680
Surplus	▲1,973	2,246	2,973	▲3,314	▲2,043
Outstanding stability fund	53,870	55,746	58,719	55,405	53,363

(Note) 1. “Expenditure” for FY2012 and FY2013 includes contingency funds ( $ ¥75 $ billion for FY2012 budget and $ ¥80 $ billion for FY2013 budget).

2. "Outstanding stability fund" for FY2010 and FY2011 budget has been reduced by the amount required for payment of the employment stability expenses because of a special measure being used ( $ ¥37 $ billion for FY2010 accounts settlement).

3. After the settlement of accounts, outstanding reserve includes the amount to be set aside as reserve fund in the next fiscal year.

4. The figures are rounded numbers.

Detailed Data 2

Balance Sheet of Two Services (Three Services) of Unemployment Insurance

(Unit: ¥100 million)

FY2009	FY2010	FY2011	FY2012 (budget)	FY2013 (budget)
Revenue	5,022	5,925	6,200	5,678	5,866
Expenditure	10,235	7,078	6,348	6,794	5,393
Surplus	$ \Delta $ 5,212	$ \Delta $ 1,153	$ \Delta $ 148	$ \Delta $ 1,116	473
Outstanding reserve	5,048	3,895	3,747	2,631	3,104

(Note) 1. “Expenditure” for FY2012 includes contingency funds ( $ ¥31 $ billion for FY2012 budget).

2. “Revenue” for FY2010 includes the amount transferred from reserve funds because of the special measure being used ( $ ¥37 $ billion for FY2010 accounts settlement).

3. After the settlement of accounts, outstanding stability fund includes the amount to be included in employment stability fund in the next fiscal year.

4. The figures are rounded numbers.
23 Rebirth of Japan Acceleration Projects – Towards Economic Revitalization and Reconstruction of the Disaster Areas – (November 2012)

Utilization of contingency funds in responding to the economic crisis and local revitalization (employment related portion: MHLW)

→ Responding to concerns over an economic downturn in thereby accelerating the rebirth of Japan and reconstruction of the disaster areas

Part 1 (implementation in conjunction with a Cabinet decision of October 26, 2012)

Career development support for human resources, including non-regular workers in growth areas

• Creation of human resource development support projects that aim at the rebirth of Japan (utilization of immediate human resource development/employment support fund) (system request)

Part 2 (Cabinet decision of November 30, 2012)

Appropriate response to the employment situation

• Enhancement of projects regarding employment creation in priority areas (¥80 billion)

### 24 Immediate Economic Measures for the Revitalization of the Japanese Economy (January 2013) FY2012 supplementary budget (employment related portion: MHLW) of ¥210.0 billion

Part 1 of efforts toward the revitalization of the Japanese economy

Temporarily securing employment for the disaster victims

· Enhancement/extension of immediate employment measure projects in response to the earthquake disaster, etc. (¥50 billion)

Creation of stable employment in the disaster areas

· Extension of business reconstruction type employment creation projects (system request)

Promotion of human resource development with regard to young people

· Creation of development support projects for young people (¥60 billion)

Local employment creation

· Creation of Business startup support type local job creation projects (¥100 billion)

Employment creation in growth areas

· Extension/enhancement of human resource development support projects that aim at the rebirth of Japan (system request)

Enhancement of labour mobility support subsidy (system request)
昭 和 55 年 度 特 别 会 計 決 算 参 照 書

(第 96 回 国 会 提 出)
## 目次

## 昭和55年度特別会計決算参照書

総理府、大蔵省及び通商産業
省所管
電源開発促進対策
大蔵省所管
造幣局
印刷局
資金運用部
国債整理基金
外国為替資金
産業投資
地震再保険
大蔵省及び自治省所管
交付税及び議与税配付金
大蔵省、通商産業省及び労働
省所管
石炭並びに石油及び石油代替
エネルギー対策
大蔵省及び建設省所管
特定国有財産整備 …… 119
文部省所管 …… 127
国立学校 …… 127
厚生省所管 …… 141
厚生保険 …… 141
船員保険 …… 179
国立病院 …… 191
あへん …… 217
国民年金 …… 223
農林水産省所管 …… 243
食糧管理 …… 243
農業共済再保険 …… 293
森林保険 …… 325
漁船再保険及漁業共済保険 …… 335
自作農創設特別措置 …… 361
国有林野事業 …… 371
特定土地改良工事 …… 391
通商産業省所管 …… 669
アルコール専売事業 …… 669
輸出保険 …… 681
機械類信用保険 …… 689
運輸省所管 …… 695
自動車損害賠償責任再保険 …… 695
港湾整備 713
自動車検査登録 757
空港整備 767
郵政省所管 781
郵政事業 781
郵便貯金 805
簡易生命保険及郵便年金 813
労働省所管 835
労働保険 835
建設省所管 867
道路整備 867
治水 881
都市開発資金融通 1031
（備考）債務に関する計算書について、該当分がないため添付を省略した会計名は次のとおりである。
資金運用部、国債整理基金、地震再保険、あへん、森林保険、輸出保険、機械類信用保険、自動車損害賠償責任再保険

(参考)
( 1 )

昭和55年度総理府、大蔵省及び通商産業省所管

電源開発促進対策特別会計決算参照書
昭和55年度総理府、大蔵省及び通商産業省所管
90000 電 源 開 発 促 進 対 策 特 別 会 計
歳 入 歳 出 決 定 計 算 書
90001 電 源 立 地 勘 定
昭和55年度における
収納済歳入額は	106,976,537,376円
であって
支出済歳出額は	41,604,891,128円
である。
したがって、歳入歳出差し引き	65,371,646,248円
の剩余を生ずる。
この剩余金は、電源開発促進対策特別会計法(昭和49年法律第80号)第7条の規定により翌年度の歳入に繰り入れることとして、決算を結了した。次に、歳入歳出決算に係る各事項の総額を示せば、下表のとおりである。
1 歳 入
歳 入 予 算 額	徴 収 決 定 済 額	収 納 済 歳 入 額	不 納 欠 損 額
当 初 予 算 額 (円)	予 算 補 正 追 加 額予算補正修正減少額(△)(円)	合 計 (円)	(円)	(円)	(円)	(円)	収 納 未 済 歳 入 額 (円)
59,873,203,000	0	59,873,203,000	106,976,537,376	106,976,537,376	0	0	47,103,334,376
2 歲 出
歳 出 予 算 額	前年度線越額
(円)	予備費使用額
(円)	歳出予算現額
(円)	支出済歳出額
(円)	翌年度線越額
(円)	不 用 額
(円)	備 考
当初予算額
(円)	予算補正追加額
予算補正修正減
少額(△)(円)	合計
(円)
59,873,203,000	0	59,873,203,000	22,429,039,660	0	82,302,242,660	41,604,891,128	22,080,996,642	18,616,354,890	翌年度線越額の内訳
電源開発促進対策特別会計法第
14条第1項の規定による線越額
22,080,996,642円
1 歲 入
款 · 項 · 目	歳入予算額
(円)	徵収決定済額
(円)	収納済歳入額
(円)	不納欠損額
(円)	収納未済歳入額
(円)	歳入予算額と収納
済歳入額との差
(△は減) (円)	増減理由
0100-00 租
税
0101-00 電 源 開 発 促 進 税
0101-01 電 源 開 発 促 進 税	39,200,000,000	37,281,879,123	37,281,879,123	0	0	△	1,918,120,877	販売電力量が予定より少なかったこと等のため
0300-00 前年度剩余金受入
0301-00 前年度剩余金受入
0301-01 前年度剩余金受入	20,672,203,000	67,712,907,136	67,712,907,136	0	0	47,040,704,136	前年度剩余金の受入れが予定より多かったため
0200-00 雑
収
入
0201-00 雑
収
入	1,000,000	1,981,751,117	1,981,751,117	0	0	1,980,751,117
0201-01 預 託 金 利 子 収 入	960,000	1,980,983,557	1,980,983,557	0	0	1,980,023,557	預託金が予定より多かったため
0201-02 返
納
金	10,000	0	0	0	0	△	10,000	返納金がなかったため
0201-03 延
滞
金	10,000	0	0	0	0	△	10,000	延滞金がなかったため
0201-04 弁 償 及 違 約 金	10,000	0	0	0	0	△	10,000	弁償金及び違約金がなかったため
総理府、大蔵省及び通商産業省所管 電源開発促進対策特別会計歳入歳出決定計算書 電源立地勘定 （5）

款 项 目	歳入予算額(円)	徵収決定済額(円)	収納済歳入額(円)	不納欠損額(円)	収納未済歳入額(円)	歳入予算額と収納済歳入額との差(△は減)(円)	增減理由
0201-05 雑入	10,000	767,560	767,560	0	0	757,560	雑入が予定より多かったため
歳入合計	59,873,203,000	106,976,537,376	106,976,537,376	0	0	47,103,334,376
2 歳出
項目	歳出予算額(円)	前年度線越額(円)	予備費使用額(円)	流用等增△減額(円)	歳出予算現額(円)	支出済歳出額(円)	翌年度線越額(円)	不 用 額(円)	備 考
01 電源立地促進対策交付金
305-16 電源立地促進対策交付金	41,414,000,000	15,685,000,000	0	0	57,099,000,000	24,836,107,501	16,546,330,000	15,716,562,499	不用額を生じたのは、地元との調整が難航したこと等により、電源立地が遅れたため
02 原子力発電安全等対策費	17,281,558,000	6,744,039,660	0	0	24,025,597,660	16,620,249,554	5,534,666,642	1,870,681,464	不用額を生じたのは、発電所立地計画の遅延に伴い、環境審査等調査の一部を中止したこと等により、原子力発電安全対策等委託費を要することが少なかったこと等のため
125-14 原子力発電安全対策等委託費	10,424,072,000	5,797,460,660	0	0	16,221,532,660	10,771,139,381	4,105,947,412	1,344,445,867
865-16 原子力発電安全対策等補助金	4,439,992,000	482,116,000	0	0	4,922,108,000	4,092,183,411	549,684,000	280,240,589
305-16 原子力発電安全対策等交付金	2,417,494,000	464,463,000	0	0	2,881,957,000	1,756,926,762	879,035,230	245,995,008
03 事務取扱費	171,815,000	0	0	0	171,815,000	148,534,073	0	23,280,927	不用額を生じたのは、庁費を要することが少なかったこと等のため
129-06 諸謝金	6,370,000	0	0	0	6,370,000	919,500	0	5,450,500
122-08 職員旅費	35,326,000	0	0	4,555,000	39,881,000	39,525,035	0	355,965	原子力発電所の設置に係る公開ヒアリングの開催のための旅費が多かったため(目)委員等旅費から4,555,000円流用
122-08 委員等旅費	6,009,000	0	0	4,555,000	1,454,000	1,135,030	0	318,970
123-09 庁費	124,110,000	0	0	0	124,110,000	106,954,508	0	17,155,492
05 諸支出金
959-18 賠償償還及払戾金	100,000	0	0	0	100,000	0	0	100,000
( 6 ) 総理府、大蔵省及び通商産業省所管 電源開発促進対策特別会計歳入歳出決定計算書 電源立地勘定

項目	歳出予算額(円)	前年度線越額(円)	予備費使用額(円)	流用等增△减額(円)	歳出予算現額(円)	支出済歳出額(円)	翌年度線越額(円)	不用額(円)	備考
04 国債整理基金特別会計へ繰入
306-22 国債整理基金特別会計へ繰入	5,730,000	0	0	0	5,730,000	0	0	5,730,000	不用額を生じたのは、一時借入金がなかったため
09予備費(959-...)	1,000,000,000	0	0	0	1,000,000,000	0	0	1,000,000,000
歳出合計	59,873,203,000	22,429,039,660	0	0	82,302,242,660	41,604,891,128	22,080,996,642	18,616,354,890
90002 電源多様化勘定
昭和55年度における
収納済歳入額は
であって
支出済歳出額は
である
したがって、歳入歳出差し引き
の剩余を生ずる。
この剩余金は、電源開発促進対策特別会計法第7条の規定により翌年度の歳入に繰り入れることとして、決算を結了した。
次に、歳入歳出決算に係る各事項の総額を示せば、下表のとおりである。
1 歳 入
歳 入 予 算 額	徴 収 決 定 済 額	収 納 済 歳 入 額	不 納 欠 損 額	収 納 未 済 歳 入 額
当 初 予 算 額 (円)	予 算 補 正 追 加 額予算補正修正減少額(△)(円)	合 計 (円)	(円)	(円)	(円)	(円)	(円)	(円)	(円)	歳入予算額と収納済歳入額との差(△は減)(円)
82,710,000,000	0	82,710,000,000	71,181,407,955	71,181,407,955	0	0	0	△	11,528,592,045
2 歳 出
歳 出 予 算 額	前年度線越額(円)	予備費使用額(円)	歳出予算現額(円)	支出済歳出額(円)	翌年度線越額(円)	不 用 額(円)	備 考
当初予算額(円)	予算補正追加額予算補正修正減少額(△)(円)	合計(円)
82,710,000,000	0	82,710,000,000	0	0	82,710,000,000	53,377,229,492	11,760,060,001	17,572,710,507	翌年度線越額の内訳電源開発促進対策特別会計法第14条第1項の規定による線越額11,760,060,001円
歳 入 歳 出 決 算 額 科 目 別 表
1 歳 入
款 · 項 · 目	歳入予算額(円)	徵収決定済額(円)	収納済歳入額(円)	不納欠損額(円)	収納未済歳入額(円)	歳入予算額と収納済歳入額との差(△は減)(円)	増減理由
0100-00 租 税
0101-00 電 源 開 発 促 進 税
0101-01 電 源 開 発 促 進 税	82,700,000,000	71,173,188,777	71,173,188,777	0	0	△	11,526,811,223	電源開発促進税法の一部を改正する法律(昭和55年法律第73号)の施行が遅れたこと等のため
0300-00 雑 収 入
0301-00 雑 収 入	10,000,000	8,219,178	8,219,178	0	0	△	1,780,822
0301-01 預 託 金 利 子 収 入	9,900,000	8,219,178	8,219,178	0	0	△	1,680,822
0301-02 雑 入	100,000	0	0	0	0	△	100,000	雑入がなかったため
歳 入 合 計	82,710,000,000	71,181,407,955	71,181,407,955	0	0	△	11,528,592,045
総理府、大蔵省及び通商産業省所管 電源開発促進対策特別会計歳入歳出決定計算書 電源多様化勘定 （9）

2 歳 出
項目	歳出予算額(円)	前年度線越額(円)	予備費使用額(円)	流用等增△減額(円)	歳出予算現額(円)	支出済歳出額(円)	翌年度線越額(円)	不 用 額(円)	備考
01 電源多様化対策費	80,812,472,000	0	0	0	80,812,472,000	53,345,973,464	11,760,060,001	15,706,438,535	不用額を生じたのは、地元との調整が難航し、高速増殖炉原型炉の着工ができなかったこと等により、動力炉・核燃料開発事業団出資金を要することが少なかったこと等のため
125-14 水力開発地点計画策定調査等委託費	237,955,000	0	0	0	237,955,000	145,736,246	68,364,754	23,854,000
125-14 石炭等火力発電実証試験等委託費	5,138,477,000	0	0	0	5,138,477,000	3,211,725,959	1,310,365,720	616,385,321
125-14 石炭ガス化技術開発委託費	1,700,000,000	0	0	0	1,700,000,000	1,528,861,000	0	171,139,000
125-14 地熱発電所環境保全実証調査等委託費	3,357,484,000	0	0	0	3,357,484,000	840,959,000	2,202,935,000	313,590,000
125-14 太陽エネルギー技術研究開発委託費	6,874,396,000	0	0	0	6,874,396,000	6,544,524,000	0	329,872,000
125-14 高効率ガスタービン研究開発等委託費	3,824,018,000	0	0	0	3,824,018,000	3,391,312,941	0	432,705,059
125-14 第二再処理工場技術確証調査委託費	2,011,138,000	0	0	0	2,011,138,000	0	1,709,467,000	301,671,000
125-14 安全解析コード改良等委託費	1,648,896,000	0	0	△ 1,998,000	1,646,898,000	238,034,000	1,155,639,000	253,225,000
925-16 中小水力発電開発費補助金	1,556,900,000	0	0	0	1,556,900,000	428,484,715	732,698,285	395,717,000
925-16 石炭火力発電所建設費補助金	3,450,000,000	0	0	0	3,450,000,000	2,625,740,130	0	824,259,870
405-16 全国地熱資源総合調査等補助金	2,384,937,000	0	0	0	2,384,937,000	277,342,900	1,282,882,100	824,712,000
925-16 地熱開発促進調査費補助金	2,596,745,000	0	0	0	2,596,745,000	515,000,000	1,772,070,000	309,675,000
925-16 地熱発電所調査井掘削費等補助金	2,398,000,000	0	0	0	2,398,000,000	796,287,715	859,722,000	741,990,285
925-16 太陽エネルギー技術研究開発事業費補助金	859,433,000	0	0	0	859,433,000	810,182,000	0	49,251,000