Silviase/jgov_v1.4_full_ann huggingface dataset:
### C. Application to Extend the Valid Period of the Residence Card (Article 19-11 of the Immigration Control Act)

A permanent resident or a mid to long-term resident for whom the expiration of the period of validity of the residence card is his or her 16 $ ^{th} $ birthday is required to submit an application for extension of the period of validity of the residence card to the Minister of Justice through the regional immigration bureau within the period for the extension.

If, however, it is difficult to apply for an extension of the valid period of the residence card within the extension application period for any unavoidable causes, such as long-term medical treatment or a long-term overseas business trip, an application for extension of the valid period of the residence card may be submitted even before the extension application period.

### D. Application for Reissuance of a Residence Card Due to Loss or Other Causes (Article 19-12 of the Immigration Control Act)

If a mid to long-term resident is no longer in possession of a residence card due to loss, theft, damage or some other causes, he or she is required to submit an application for reissuance of the residence card to the Minister of Justice through the regional immigration bureau within 14 days of becoming aware of such fact (if the foreign national was away from Japan when he or she became aware of such fact, the first day of entry into Japan following such discovery).

### E. Application for Reissuance of a Residence Card Due to Damage or Soiling (Article 19-13 of the Immigration Control Act)

If the residence card in the possession of the foreign national has been substantially damaged or soiled, or the data in the IC chip of the residence card has been damaged, an application for re-issuance of the residence card may be submitted to the Minister of Justice in accordance with the procedures of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice at the regional immigration office.

However, in cases where a foreign national has received an order from the Director of the Regional Immigration Bureau to file an application for reissuance of a residence card because his or her residence card has been substantially damaged or soiled, or the data in the IC chip embedded in his or her residence card has been damaged, he or she must file an application for reissuance of a residence card with the Minister of Justice through the procedures specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice at the regional immigration office, within 14 days of the day of receiving the order.

If the holder of the residence card wishes to exchange his or her residence card, he or she is able to apply for re-issuance even if the residence card has not been damaged or otherwise soiled. The payment of a fee of 1,300 yen is required, in this case, for issuance of the residence card.
## (3) Notification Concerning the Organization of Affiliation or Concerning the Spouse (Chart3)

A. Notification from a Mid to Long-Term Resident Concerning the Organization of Affiliation $ (^{*}1) $

(a) Notification Concerning the Organization Where the Foreign National Is Engaging in Activities (Article 19-16, item (i) of the Immigration Control Act)

If a change occurs in the name or location of an organization where a mid to long-term resident, who is residing in Japan with the status of residence of “Professor”, “Investor/Business Manager”, “Legal/Accounting Services”, “Medical Services”, “Instructor”, “Intra-company Transferee”, “Technical Intern Training”, “Student” or “Trainee”, is engaging in activities or the organization where the mid to long-term resident is engaging activities is extinguished or the mid to long-term resident leaves the employment of the organization or moves to another organization, he or she is required to notify the Minister of Justice of such changes within 14 days.

## (b) Notification Concerning the Contracting Organization (Article 19-16, item (ii) of the Immigration Control Act)

If a change arises in the name or location of a contracting organization, the contracting organization is extinguished, or the contract with the contracting organization ends or a new contract is entered into, the mid to long-term resident residing in Japan with the status of residence of “Researcher”, “Engineer”, “Specialist in Humanities/International Services”, “Entertainer” (limited to cases where the foreign national is engaging in activities based on a contract with a public or private organization in Japan) or “Skilled Labor” is required to notify the Minister of Justice of such changes within 14 days.

## (c) Notification Concerning the Spouse of the Foreign National (Article 19-16, item (iii) of the Immigration Control Act)

If a mid to long-term resident residing in Japan with the status of residence of “Dependent”, Designated Activities (c)) (*2), “Spouse or Child of Japanese National” or “Spouse or Child of Permanent Resident”, who has the status of a spouse, is separated from his or her spouse due to divorce or death, he or she is required to notify the Minister of Justice of such changes within 14 days.
### B. Notification concerning mid long-term residents to be given by the organization of affiliation (Article 19-17 of the Immigration Control Act)

Public and private organizations in Japan (except for those employers who are required to notify the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 28 of the Employment Measures Act), which accept mid to long-term residents residing in Japan with the status of residence of “Professor”, “Investor/Business Manager”, “Legal/Accounting Services”, “Medical Services”, “Researcher”, “Instructor”, “Engineer”, “Specialist in Humanities/International Services”, “Intra-company Transferee”, “Entertainer”, “Skilled Labor” or “Student”, are required to endeavor to notify the Minister of Justice of the commencement and end of the acceptance of the mid to long-term resident and other matters relating to the status of acceptance.

Chart 3 Procedural flow of the residency management system of mid to long-term residents
## ② Measures Pertaining to Special Permanent Residents

## (1) Revision of the system of special permanent residents

In conjunction with the introduction of the residency management system for mid to long-term residents, for the purpose of increased convenience, the following revisions were made to the system of special permanent residents although the previous system was substantially maintained, and these revisions were enforced on July 9, 2012.

a. The Minister of Justice is to issue a special permanent resident certificate as a certificate proving the legal status of the special permanent resident.

b. The period of validity of re-entry permission for special permanent residents has been extended, and in addition, if a special permanent resident in possession of a valid passport and special permanent resident certificate (including registration certificates treated as a special permanent resident certificate) re-enters Japan within two years of departure, he or she will not be required, in principle, to obtain re-entry permission (introduction of a Special Re-entry Permit System).

## (2) Special permanent resident certificate

With a view to keeping the necessary matters to be given in the special permanent resident certificate to the bare minimum, the matters which need to be given have been greatly reduced when compared to the matters which were required for the registration certificate, and the procedures for changes to the given matters or reissuance of the certificate may, as before, be undertaken at the municipal office counter.

Special permanent resident certificate

## (3) Publicity measures relating to applications to switch from the registration certificate to the special permanent resident certificate

The registration certificate possessed by special permanent residents, on and after July 9, 2012, is treated for a certain period as a special permanent resident certificate. But they will have to apply to switch their registration certificates to special permanent resident certificates (referred to below as “application to switch”) or will have to apply for an extension of the period of validity by the last day of this period.

The Immigration Bureau has been implementing various publicity measures through the Immigration Bureau’s website, radio commercials and websites for mobile devices towards the deadline of July 8, 2015, which is the application deadline for many of the special permanent residents.
## Residential Basic Books System Pertaining to Foreign Residents

On July 9, 2012, the Alien Registration Act was abolished and, at the same time, the Act for Partial Amendment (Act No. 77 of 2009) of the Residential Basic Book Act (Act No. 81 of 1967; hereinafter referred to as "Residential Basic Book Act") entered into force. Correspondingly, the Residential Basic Book Act came to be applied to foreign residents, and residence certificates are to be prepared for the foreign residents in the same manner as for Japanese residents by the municipality with jurisdiction over the residence of the foreign resident.

Whereas previously multinational households (for example, where the husband is a foreign national with a Japanese wife) were registered through separate systems (the Alien Registration Act and the Residential Basic Book Act), the newly amended Residential Basic Book Act allows for the issuance of a copy of a residence certificate which gives all of the members of the household.

The points of the residential basic book system are as follows:

(1) Foreign nationals eligible for a residence certificate.

Residence certificates will be prepared for those foreign nationals who come under any of the following items (i) to (iv) and who have an address in the area of the municipality with jurisdiction over the address.

(i) Mid to long-term residents

(ii) Special permanent residents

(iii) Foreign nationals with landing permission for temporary refuge or foreign nationals with permission for provisional stay

(iv) Foreign nationals staying through transitional measures through birth $ (^{*}1) $ or foreign nationals staying through transitional measures through loss of Japanese nationality $ (^{*}2) $ .

(2) Matters to be given in the residence certificate pertaining to the foreign resident

The residence certificate pertaining to a foreign resident shall contain as is the case with Japanese residents, basic matters such as the name and address of the foreign resident, and details will also be given of matters relating to insured persons such as for national health insurance and the national pension, as well as matters specific to the foreign resident such as nationality/region, status of residence and period of stay.

(3) Notifications based on the Residential Basic Book Act

If the foreign resident changes his or her address, as with Japanese residents, he or she is required to give a notification of transfer (moving out) and a notification of transfer (moving in) in accordance with the Residential Basic Book Act.
Moreover, in accordance with the provisions of the Immigration Control Act and Special Act on the Immigration Control of, Inter Alia, Those Who Have Lost Japanese Nationality Pursuant to the Treaty of Peace with Japan, mid to long-term residents and special permanent residents are required to notify the Minister of Justice of their residence, but upon presenting their residence card or special permanent resident certificate to the mayor of the municipality and undertaking the procedures for the notification of transfer (moving out) based on the Residential Basic Book Act, the notification of the residence shall be deemed to have been made, and the foreign national is not required to submit a further notification of residence.

## (4) Notification from the Minister of Justice

If the foreign resident has given a notification of changes to the name or other matters to the regional immigration bureau or has received permission for a change of the status of residence or extension of the period of stay or other permission, a revision will have to be made in the matters given in the residence certificate, and therefore, the Minister of Justice will notify the mayor of the municipality, which has jurisdiction over the area of the address of such foreign resident, of the changes in the given matters, and the mayor of the municipality shall make the revisions to the given matters of the residence certificate based on the notification. In this way, the burden of notification on the foreign resident has been lessened when compared to the past, and the accuracy of the records in the residential basic books is being maintained.
## 2 Immigration Bureau's seiji search system

The name given in the residence card and the special permanent resident certificate (referred to below as “resident card, etc.”), in principle, should be given using the Roman alphabet, but in certain cases such as where a request is made by the foreign national, the name may be indicated in kanji together with or in place of the Roman letters.

With regard to the indication of names using kanji characters in the residence card, etc., in accordance with the Public Notice on the Indication of Kanji Character Names in the Residence Cards and Other Certificates (Ministry of Justice Public Notice No. 582 of 2011), the characters were specified as within the scope of seiji characters (*), while simplified characters (referring to Chinese simplified letters and Taiwanese traditional letters which do not match the seiji characters) may be used by replacing them with characters within the range of seiji characters. Owing to such, there were concerns that if the kanji name indicated on the previous registration certificate differed from the kanji name given on the residence card, etc. for the same individual, financial institutions would not be able to confirm the identity the individual.

Therefore, the Immigration Bureau introduced the Immigration Bureau seiji search system, which enables a simple search of kanji names given in the residence card, etc. based on the character codes of simplified characters on July 1, 2013, and made it available for use on the Immigration Bureau's website (http://lapse-immi.moj.go.jp:50122/).
## Section 5 ☐ Deportation Procedures for Foreign Nationals

In immigration control administration, it is necessary to achieve a balance so as to promote the smooth acceptance of foreign nationals on the one hand, and to maintain security and order in Japanese society by removing unwelcome foreign nationals from Japan on the other.

The deportation procedures for foreign nationals constitute a powerful administrative action where the foreign national is deported even if deportation is against the foreign national's will. In international customary law, deportation is left to the discretion of the State. In Japan, the grounds for deportation and the deportation procedures are provided for in the Immigration Control Act and deportation is implemented on the basis of these provisions.

Deportation procedures begin with an immigration control officer conducting an investigation, and is composed of three steps: namely, an examination by an immigration inspector, a hearing by a special inquiry officer, and a decision rendered by the Minister of Justice for the objection filed by the foreign national in order to ensure that the foreign national who is undergoing the deportation procedures will be given ample opportunity to contest the facts of the case or to assert his or her side as to why he or she should be permitted to stay, and to ensure that a decision is made after a careful examination of the facts (Chart4).
Chart 4 Flow of the deportation procedures and departure order procedures
(1) There is no probable cause to suspect that the applicant falls under any of the reasons for deportation.

of refugee status within six months of landing in Japan (Article 61-2-2, paragraph (1) of the Immigration Control Act). Even if the foreign national does not satisfy the requirements, the Minister of Justice may grant special permission to stay if there are any grounds to grant special permission to stay (Article 61-2-2, paragraph (2) of the Immigration Control Act).

A foreign national who has been recognized as a refugee may receive a refugee travel document as one of the effects under the Immigration Control Act (Article 61-2-12 of the Immigration Control Act), and some of the requirements to obtain permission for permanent residence will be eased (Article 61-2-11 of the Immigration Control Act).

## 3 Filing of an Objection

If the foreign national has an objection to the disposition, such as denial of recognition of refugee status or revocation of recognition of refugee status, he or she may file an objection with the Minister of Justice (Article 61-2-9, paragraph (1) of the Immigration Control Act). Under the amended Immigration Control Act, when making a decision on an objection, the Minister of Justice shall consult with refugee examination counselors who have been appointed from persons who have an academic background in law or international current affairs (Article 61-2-9, paragraph (3) of the Immigration Control Act).

Chart 5 Patterns and procedures for application for recognition of refugee status

Requirements of permission for provisional stay

(3) The applicant came to Japan directly from a region where there is a fear of persecution.

(4) The applicant has never been sentenced to imprisonment with or without work for a certain criminal offense under the criminal law, etc. after entering Japan.

(5) A deportation order has not been issued against the applicant.

(6) There is no probable cause to suspect that the applicant may flee from the country.
## 4 Landing Permission for Temporary Refuge

Landing permission for temporary refuge, prescribed as one of the types of special landing permission granted to foreign nationals (Article 18-2 of the Immigration Control Act), will be granted by an immigration inspector if a foreign national aboard a vessel or aircraft has fled from a territory where his or her life, body or physical freedom is likely to be endangered for the reasons prescribed in the Refugee Convention and other reasons equivalent thereto, and it is appropriate for permission for temporary landing to be granted to such foreign national. The period for landing is determined as a period not exceeding six months (Article 18-2, paragraph (4) of the Immigration Control Act; Article 18, paragraph (5) of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Immigration Control Act).

## Section 7 ☐ Basic Plan for Immigration Control

Reflecting the substantial increase in the number of foreign nationals entering Japan and the growing diversification of their activities, the entry and residence in Japan of foreign nationals is more than ever having a large impact on the lives of the Japanese people and on the economy. It is therefore necessary to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the status of entry and residence of foreign nationals in Japan and the manner in which foreign nationals affect the lives of Japanese people and the economy, and moreover stipulate the basic concept based on which the guidelines and policies on the control over the entry and residence of foreign nationals should be formulated in coordination with the government authorities concerned.

To this end, the Minister of Justice formulates and publishes the Basic Plan for Immigration Control on which the policies on the entry and residence of foreign nationals are to be based under the Immigration Control Act in consultation with the heads of the relevant administrative organs, fully reflecting the views and opinions received from various sectors. The first Basic Plan for Immigration Control was formulated in 1992, followed by the second, third and fourth Basic Plan for Immigration Control formulated in 2000, 2005 and 2010, respectively (Chart6).
## 第 1 第 6 2 回被保護者全国一斉調查基礎調查要綱

## 1 目的

この調査は、生活保護法による保護を受けている世帯及び保護を受けていた世帯の保護の受給状況を把握し、生活保護制度及び厚生労働行政の企画運営に必要な基礎資料を得るために行うものである。

## 2 調査時点

平成20年7月1日現在とする。

## 3 調査客体

この調査の客体は、以下の（1）及び（2）とする。

（１）全被保護世帯（ただし、次のいずれかに該当する世帯は調査客体としない。）

①保護停止中の世帯

②出産扶助、生業扶助、葬祭扶助、住宅扶助の住宅維持費及び生活扶助の移送費等一時的性格を有する扶助のみを受給している世帯

③保護施設に入所又は利用し、保護施設事務費のみの支出の対象となっている世帯

（２）調査時直近１か月間における保護廃止世帯

## 4 調査事項

調査事項は、第62回被保護者全国一斉調査基礎調査票（様式1。以下「基礎調査票」という。）の事項とする。

様式 1 （参考表①）・・・全被保護世帯

様式 1 （参考表②）・・・調査時直近 1 か月間における保護廃止世帯

なお、都道府県・指定都市・中核市において必要とする事項については、本調査の附带調査として追加して差し支えない。

## 5 調査方法及び基礎調査票の記入

福祉事務所の地区担当員が「第3基礎調査票の記入要領」に基づき、各自が担当する調査客体について、平成20年7月1日の保護の決定状況により必要な事項を基礎調査票に記入する方法で実施する。なお、7月2日以降同月14日までの間に、7月1日以前の日付で保護の開始、廃止、停止及び変更の決定が行われたときも必要な事項を基礎調査票に記入する方法で実施する。
## 6 調査票（様式2）の作成、審査及び提出

（1）福祉事務所は記入された基礎調査票の内容を「第4基礎調査票及び調査票の審査要領」の1に基づき審査した上、集計を行い、この結果を様式2による調査票（第1表～第10表）（以下「調査票」という。）に記入すること。

なお、調査票を作成する際には、「第4基礎調査票及び調査票の審査要領」の2に示す各表間の整合性がとれているか確認すること。

作成した調査票は、提出表（様式3）を添えて、都道府県・指定都市・中核市本庁に提出する。

（2）都道府県・指定都市・中核市本庁は、福祉事務所から提出された調査票の枚数と提出表との審査を行うとともに、調査票の内容を「第4基礎調査票及び調査票の審査要領」の2に基づいて審査し、福祉事務所ごとに提出表と調査票をまとめ、平成20年9月12日までに厚生労働省社会・援護局保護課に1部提出する。

なお、提出表及び調査票の提出にあたっては、電子媒体によってこれを行うことができる。

また、都道府県・指定都市・中核市において附帯調査の実施を予定している場合は、その調査票、記入要領及び集計結果表も提出するものとする。

## 7 厚生労働省における集計及び結果の公表

厚生労働省における集計は外部委託し、結果の公表は厚生労働省社会・援護局保護課が行う。
## 第 1 7 回 金融庁契約監視委員会の概要

1．開催日時：平成26年12月5日（金）13時30分～15時00分

2．開催場所：中央合同庁舎第7号館 9階 共用3会議室

3. 出席者：赤松委員長、石島委員、佐竹委員

4. 議題：平成26年度上半期に締結された契約について

平成 26 年度上半期に締結した契約 (154 件) のうち、各委員の抽出した 13 件（関連するものをまとめることにより、以下の 9 案件に集約）について審議。

（１）契約金額の妥当性等について

①金融庁電子申請・届出システムの設計・構築及び機器等賃貸借、並びに金融庁電子申請・届出システム及び関連システムの運用支援業務

②公認会計士試験システムに係る運用支援業務

③EDINET の投資法人制度の改正に係る改修等

④金融庁業務支援統合システムの変更開発

⑤外国金融当局等からの公文書及び報告書等（訴訟事案等含む）の翻訳

（２）人事・給与関係業務情報システム関係について

⑥平成26年度金融庁給与計算システム運用支援業務、資金前渡システム運用支援業務、及び人事・給与関係業務情報システム導入支援業務

（３）類似契約案件における一括調達の可否について

⑦公認会計士試験システムの政府共通プラットフォームへの移行に係るコンサルティング業務、及び金融庁ウェブサイトシステムの政府共通プラットフォームへの移行に関するコンサルティング業務

（4）その他

⑧平成26年度アジア金融連携センター（Asian Financial Partnership Center: AFPAC）

研究員の日本滞在サポート業務

⑨ハイヤーの使用に関する請負契約
### 5. 主な審議内容

## （１）契約金額の妥当性等について

①金融庁電子申請・届出システムの設計・構築及び機器等賃貸借、並びに金融庁電子申請・届出システム及び関連システムの運用支援業務

②公認会計士試験システムに係る運用支援業務

③EDINET の投資法人制度の改正に係る改修等

④金融庁業務支援統合システムの変更開発

⑤外国金融当局等からの公文書及び報告書等（訴訟事案等含む）の翻訳

質問・意見	事務局からの説明
·①は、届出システムを利用する者に費用負担させるような工夫ができないのか。·⑤は、他省庁との単価の比較は行っているのか。·必要なものは高額となっても行わなければならないこともありうるが、代替手段とコストを比較する等により常にコスト意識を働かせる必要がある。	·届出システムは、届出者のためというより、届出を受ける金融庁の業務の利便のために導入しているという面もあり、これまでは、金融行政の中立性確保の観点から監督費用の負担を金融機関に求めないという考え方をとってきている。·他省庁との単価の比較は行っていないが、庁内他局との比較や、複数者から見積りをとることにより妥当性を判断している。·指摘を踏まえ、コストを意識して検討を行っていく。

（２）人事・給与関係業務情報システム関係について

⑥平成26年度金融庁給与計算システム運用支援業務、資金前渡システム運用支援業務、及び人事・給与関係業務情報システム導入支援業務

質問・意見	事務局からの説明
・費用削減のため、政府内でのシステム統合の検討はしているのか。	・府省共通の人事・給与関係業務情報システムが完成すれば、システム統合が図れる予定である。
## （３）類似契約案件における一括調達の可否について

⑦公認会計士試験システムの政府共通プラットフォームへの移行に係るコンサルティング業務、及び金融庁ウェブサイトシステムの政府共通プラットフォームへの移行に関するコンサルティング業務

質問・意見	事務局からの説明
特になし

## （４）その他

⑧平成26年度アジア金融連携センター（Asian Financial Partnership Center: AFPAC）研究員の日本滞在サポート業務

⑨ハイヤーの使用に関する請負契約

質問・意見	事務局からの説明
·⑧の受託者と金融庁等との間に人的関係（天下り等）はあるのか。
·ハイヤーと公用車のコストを比較する必要があるのではないか。	·人事的な交流はないことを確認している。
·ハイヤーの使用は公用車の使用が困難な場合に使用しているものであるが、指摘を踏まえ、コストを意識して対応する。

以上
規雇用拡大に向けた動きがみられてきている。

## 正規雇用労働者の増加の背景には、人手不足も一因に

2015 年 1 〜 3 月期に入って男女共に正規雇用労働者が増加に転じた背景には、業況の改善とともに人手不足が考えられる。第 1 －（2）－ 6 図では、雇用形態別の労働者過不足判断 D.I. の推移を表している。この図では、値がプラスであることは、人手不足の状況を示しており、2011 年 7 〜 9 月期以降、第 1 －（2）－ 6 図に示す全ての雇用形態で人手不足の状態となり、人手不足感が高まっていることが分かる。

2014年以降の労働者過不足判断 D.I. の推移をみると、正社員等の不足感が大きく高まってきており、2015年1〜3月期には、パートタイム労働者と正社員等の不足感が逆転し、パートタイム労働者よりも正社員等の不足感が高い状況となっている。このような需要面からの影響により正規雇用労働者が増加に転じたことが一因と考えられる。

第1－（2）－6図 雇用形態別労働者過不足判断D.I.の推移（調査産業計）

○ 雇用形態別に労働者過不足判断 D.I. の推移をみると、景気回復にともない、人手不足感が高まっている。また足下では正社員等の不足感がパートタイムの不足感よりも高まっている。

資料出所 厚生労働省「労働経済動向調査」をもとに厚生労働省労働政策担当参事官室にて作成

（注）1）正社員等は雇用期間を定めないで雇用されている者又は1年以上の期間の雇用契約を結んで雇用されている者をいい、パートタイムは除かれている。

2）グラフのシャドー部分は景気後退期。

## 男性は若年世代で正規雇用労働者が増加、女性は幅広い世代で非正規雇用労働者が増加

足下の2014年では、どのような年齢層において雇用者数に動きがあったのか、より細かく雇用形態別にみていこう。

第1－（2）－7図では、男女別、年齢階級別、雇用形態別に2013年から2014年にかけての雇用者数の増減を示している。

まず、正規雇用労働者は、男性は25～29歳、30～34歳、35～39歳、60～64歳層で、女性は20～24歳、25～29歳、30～34歳、35～39歳、60～64歳層で減少しているが、いずれも人口減少よりも小さな減少となっており、主に人口変動の影響で減少していることが示唆される。また男女ともに、40～44歳、45～49歳、50～54歳、65歳以上において正規雇