Silviase/jgov_v1.4_full_ann huggingface dataset:
#### 4.1. Calibrating the Model

The benchmark values of the main parameters of the model are presented in Table 1. The sources of the parameter values are: Kato (2002) for household preferences, and Sadahiro and Shimasawa (2001) for production; Cabinet Office (2003) for macroeconomic variables; the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research (NIPSSR) for demographic data; and Fougère and Mérette (1999) for the human capital sector. We obtain the average annual growth rate of the individual human capital 0.53 percent by calibrating this model under these parameter settings. This value is compatible with the actual growth rates of human capital stock measured by the average years of school and the college wage premium in Japan.

Usually the calibration of dynamic computable general equilibrium models assumes a steady state for the simulation starting year. However, since many countries including Japan have been experiencing terrible demographic changes up to now, it is very difficult to approximate the economy in 2001 in a steady state. So we begin simulations from non-steady-state initial conditions, which are based on 2001. Therefore, we assume that the economy in 2001 was not in a steady state, but was on the transition pass to a steady state in the long run.

By starting with actual Japanese fiscal, economic, and demographic realities, the model generates a much more realistic time-path of the variables, including population age structure, elderly dependency ratio, and capital deepening. The calibration results are provided in Table 2.

#### 4.2. Simulation Analysis

We present estimates of the macroeconomic effects of ageing, based on the endogenous growth overlapping generations model described in the previous section. First, we describe the baseline simulation results on the main economic variables, which appear to be appropriate to capture the impacts of ageing. Second, we present the results of two policy change scenarios on them. We also compare the long-run effects with the exogenous growth OLG model. Finally, we provide two sensitivity tests by modifying the value of the elasticity of human capital production $ \gamma $ .

Since the model is simulated to year 2400 (500 periods), we consider a long enough period for a steady-state to be achieved. We report our analysis mostly on the period 2003-2050, which corresponds to the demographic
projection of the NIPSSR. For simplicity, government expenditures to GDP ratio are assumed to remain constant at year 2001 levels.

In the model, any pressure on the government budget constraint is endogenously compensated by a change in the wage income tax rate, and also by any shocks on current benefits that are endogenously financed by an increase in the contribution rate.

Each person enters the model at the age of 21, and he/she lives for 60 periods (at age 80) in the model, which correspond to Japanese average life span. As a result, one period in the model is equivalent to one year of the real world approximately. Moreover, we use 20-24 year-old population data estimated by NIPSSR until 2050. After that, the growth rate between generations is assumed to be 0 percent. In the long run, as the population reaches a steady state, we can also surmise that the economy will reach a steady state.

#### 4.3. Simulation Results

The simulation results describing the macroeconomic impacts of ageing are summarized in Figures 2 to 5. We present the results for economic growth rate, effective wage income tax rate, pension contribution rate, national savings rate, interest rate, and human capital.

## Baseline Scenario

First, we see the change in the population structure in the model. Figure 2 shows the difference between the old age dependency ratio calibrated in the model and the one from the original NIPSSR projection. As can be seen from the figure, we succeeded in approximating the projected demographic shock. Second, we see the baseline simulation results. Figure 3 gives the results. During the demographic transition, the effective wage income tax rate hardly changes or slightly decreases to maintain an intertemporal government budget constraint. The pension contribution rate, in turn, increases sharply, by 7.6 percent points from its 2003 level in 2050, to finance increased benefits.

Population ageing puts downward pressure on national savings under the life cycle hypothesis. As mentioned above, the life-cycle theory of consumptions/savings behavior is a key assumption of the model. According to our results, the national savings rate falls by 9.6 percent points between 2003 and 2050. According to the result, it is the same that the savings rate is
decreased by ageing, whether we use the exogenous growth OLG model or the endogenous growth OLG model.

Ageing also leads to a reduction in the growth rate of the labor force and capital stock (due to the reduction of savings rate). However, since the labor force is more negatively affected by the demographic shock than is the capital stock, the capital deepening progresses; this puts downward pressure on the real return to physical capital by 0.8 basis points between 2003 and 2050, and upward pressure on real wage rates. Since the rise of present value of future net real wages makes the time allocated to education increase, the human capital stock increases. It also raises effective labor. Thus because a reduction in the growth rates of the labor force and capital stock is offset by the rise of the effective labor productivity, the aggregated economic growth rate maintains positive growth.

As shown in Figure 3(6), the demographic shock leads to an increase in human capital. And it is about 2.8 times between 2003 and 2050.

#### 4.4. Policy Change Scenarios

To study the impacts of the policy change against ageing and to compare its predictions with the exogenous growth OLG model, we simulate two policy change scenarios and the exogenous growth version. We assume that policy changes will be executed in 2004. Of course, we chose this year quite arbitrarily. Figures 4 to 5 represent the effect on the main economic variables mentioned above in terms of deviations from the baseline results.

## Pension Reform

The first policy change is pension reform. We suppose that the pay-as-you-go public pension system will be entirely abolished in 2004. So agents in the model rely solely on private savings to support their lives post-retirement. Figure 4 shows the results. The first effect of pension reform is to increase the present value of future net income. This net increase of it, in turn, has effects on the following two directions: increased savings rate, and creation new incentives to invest in human capital formation. Thus increases in physical capital stock caused by the rise in savings and in human capital stock make economic growth rate accelerate and rise by 16.2 percent in the long run compared with in the baseline scenario. As far as the interest rate is concerned, the long-run effect is negative as physical capital stock increases.
Comparing now the exogenous growth version, we conclude that the effect in endogenous growth is more cumulative and larger than that in exogenous growth.

## Fiscal Reconstruction

Third, as a second policy change scenario, we suppose that government expenditure is cut by about 6 percent compared to GDP, which corresponds to government bonds to GDP year 2001 level, at 2004. We present the results in Figure 5.

In this simulation, as well as in the previous simulation results, the endogenous/exogenous growth scenarios deliver the same direction of conclusions. The effective wage income tax rate and pension contribution rate are reduced and the savings rate increases, which leads to a decrease in interest rates thanks to capital deepening. A consequence of these two effects, through the same channel as the previous simulation results, makes the time allocated to education increase. Thus the aggregated economic growth rate is stimulated because of the accumulation of physical capital attributed to the rise of savings and of human capital. The long-run growth rate effect of the policy change, however, does not continue in the exogenous OLG model in this simulation. Moreover, we also conclude that the effect of the policy change is larger in the endogenous growth version than in the exogenous growth version, even in this case.

#### 4.5. Sensitivity Tests

Finally, we provide two alternative scenarios for the sensitivity tests—Senst 1 and Senst 2—to study the robustness of the endogenous growth model. First we reduce the elasticity of human capital production with respect to the fraction of time allocated to education $ \gamma $ , on which there is no consensus, from original value 0.7 to 0.5 (Senst 1). Second, we increase it from 0.7 to 0.9 (Senst 2).

As shown in Table 3, the long-run effect of ageing on economic growth is reduced by 1.6 percent in Senst 1. In turn, it is increased by 1.3 percent in Senst 2. From this table, we can see that the change of this parameter produces similar steady states. The economic growth rate, savings rate, effective wage income tax rate, pension contribution rate, and interest rate are roughly similar to each scenario. In short, the difference between the
baseline and two sensitivity scenarios is too small. Hence, we conclude that our model developed in this paper is robust on the parameters of the production function of human capital at a certain level; moreover, the simulation results obtained in the previous section are unaffected by the value of parameters.

### 5. Conclusion

Ageing is expected to progress sharply through the 21 $ ^{st} $ century in Japan. In this paper, to study whether ageing itself and policy reforms to cope with ageing make any impact through human capital formation on the Japanese economy quantitatively, we develop a multi-period computable endogenous growth overlapping generations model where growth is generated by the accumulation of human capital.

We have thus computed responses to the following three scenarios: a baseline scenario, in which economic/fiscal/public pension situations in 2001 are maintained into the future (scenario 1); a change from the pay-as-you-go pension scheme to a fully funded pension scheme (scenario 2); and government expenditure cut by 6 percent compared to GDP (scenario 3) in using this endogenous growth OLG model. Furthermore, to analyze the significant roles the policy changes have on the economy, we compare the results of the endogenous growth version with those of the exogenous growth version.

We conclude that the main results of these scenarios are:

1. Human capital investment is important to assure sustained economic growth. The endogenously determined growth rate of human capital offsets the negative labor growth rate, which in turn keeps a positive aggregated economic growth rate as well as a positive per capita growth rate.

2. Two policy changes—pension reform and fiscal consolidation—promote human capital accumulation and thus accelerate economic growth. Consequently, policy reforms which do affect incentives to allocate more time to acquire human capital, lead to growth effects. We find that both policy changes have positive but modest effects, too, on the long-run economic growth rate.

3. The traditional exogenous growth OLG model underestimates the effect of
policy reform comparing the endogenous growth OLG model.

From these results, we believe that it is important to manage policies that put emphasis on and give priority to the role of human capital investment through education and the work training to cope with the ageing population, to avoid the negative impacts potentially inherent in ageing, and to maintain positive sustained growth.

## References

Auerbach, A.J. and L.J. Kotlikoff. Dynamic Fiscal Policy. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1987.

Bouzahzah, M., De la Croix, D., and Frédéric Docquiera. “Policy Reforms and Endogenous Growth in Computable OLG Economies.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 2002. 26 (12): 2093–2113.

Fougère, M. and M. Mérette. “Population Ageing and Economic Growth in Seven OECD Countries.” Economic Modelling. 1999. 16 (3): 411-427.

Kato, R.R. "Government Deficit, Public Investment, and Public Capital in the Transition to an Ageing Japan." Journal of the Japanese and International Economies. 2002. 16 (4): 462-491.

Lucas, R. E. Jr. "On the Mechanics of Economic Development." Journal of Monetary Economics. 1988. 22 (1): 3-42.

National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. Population Projections for Japan, HWS Association, Tokyo, 2003.

Rebelo, S. "Long-Run Policy Analysis and Long-Run Growth." Journal of Political Economy. 1991. 99 (3): 500-521.

Romer, P. “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth.” Journal of Political Economy. 1986. 94 (5): 1002-1037.

Romer, P. "Endogenous Technological Change." Journal of Political Economy. October, 1990. 98 (5): 71-102.

Sadahiro, A. and M. Shimasawa. "Fiscal Sustainability and the Primary Surplus: A Simulation Analysis with OLG Model (in Japanese)," JCER Economic Journal. July, 2001. No. 43: 117-132.

___ and ___, “The Computable Overlapping Generations Model with an Endogenous Growth Mechanism,” Economic Modelling. January, 2003. 20 (1): 1-24.
Solow, R.M. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth." Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1956. 70 (1): 65-94.

Swan, T. “Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation.” Economic Record. 1956. 32(2): 334-361.

Uzawa, H. "Optimum Technical Change in an Aggregative Model of Economic Growth." International Economic Review. 1965. 6 (1): 18-31.
Table 1 Values of key parameters and exogenous variables

Capital income share	a	0.25
Intertemporal elast. of subst.	1/γ	2.2409
Pure rate of Time preference	ρ	0.02
Education parameter	θ	0.7
Replacement ratio	β	0.594
Subsidy ratio*	ξ	0.33/0.50
Physical capital depreciation	δ	0.05
Gov. Exp. to GDP ratio	g	23.4
Consumption tax rate	τc	0.05
Interest tax rate	τr	0.20

* The pension system is reformed in 2004. And the subsidy ratio is changed to 50 percent after the year 2004.

Table 2 Calibration results (The fiscal year 2001)

Official	Model
National saving rate (percent)	25.9	26.2
Pension contribution rate (percent)	13.58	13.40
Bond to GDP ratio (percent)	6.3	6.5
Interest payment on public debt (percent)	3.1	3.2
National debt to GDP ratio (percent)	96.4	97.1
Effective wage income tax rate (percent)	-	16.9
Interest rate (percent)	-	2.10

Table 3 Sensitivity tests (deviation from the baseline)

Senst 1	Senst 2
GDP growth rate ( percent)	-1.6	1.3
National saving rate ( percent)	-0.1	0.2
Wage income tax rate ( percent)	0.1	-0.6
Pension contribution rate ( percent)	0.1	-0.1
Interest rate (basis points)	0.02	-0.02
Figure 1 Pension programs in Japan

Figure 2 Old age dependency ratio

Sources: NIPSSR (2003) and author's calculation
Figure 3 Baseline simulation (Scenario1)

(1)GDP growth rate

(4) Pension contribution rate

(2)Saving rate

(5) Interest rate

(3) Wage income tax rate

(6)Human capital per capita
Figure 4 Pension reform (Scenario2)

(1)GDP growth rate

(4) Pension contribution rate

(2)Saving rate

(5) Interest rate

(3) Wage income tax rate

(6)Human capital per capita
Figure 5 Fiscal reconstruction (Scenario3)

(1)GDP growth rate

(4) Pension contribution rate

(2)Saving rate

(5) Interest rate

(3) Wage income tax rate

(6)Human capital per capita
(参考)

昭和53年度各省各庁物品増減及び現在額報告書
昭 和 53 年 度 皇 室 費 一 般 会 計

物品增減及び現在額報告書
分類及び細分類	品目	昭和52年度末現在(A)	昭和53年度間減(B)	昭和53年度末現在(A±B)
増(a)	減(b)	差引(a-b)	価格改定による増又は減(円)
数量(個)	価格(円)	数量(個)	価格(円)	数量(個)	価格(円)	数量(個)	価格(円)
皇室
宮廷用品
備品	121	350,297,735	7	20,438,000	6	13,589,000	1	6,849,000	160,000	122	357,306,735
1電気機器	1	4,800,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	4,800,000
3工作機器	4	5,075,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	5,075,000
6試験及び測定機器	5	6,454,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5	6,454,000
7荷役運搬機器	2	2,815,000	1	640,000	0	0	1	640,000	0	3	3,455,000
8産業機器	35	52,903,403	1	577,000	0	0	1	577,000	0	36	53,480,403
10車両及び軌条	44	213,734,998	5	19,221,000	5	13,069,000	0	6,152,000	160,000	44	220,046,998
11医療機器	11	42,457,900	0	0	1	520,000	△1	△520,000	0	10	41,937,900
13雑機器	19	22,057,434	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	19	22,057,434
昭和53年度衆議院所管一般会计物品增減及び現在額報告書
分類及び細分類	品目	昭和52年度末現在(A)	昭和53年度間減(B)	昭和53年度末現在(A±B)
増(a)	減(b)	差引(a-b)	価格改定による増又は減(円)
数(個)	価格(円)	数(個)	価格(円)	数(個)	価格(円)	数(個)	価格(円)
衆議院
庁用品
備品	233	343,233,725	31	67,208,200	24	31,022,500	7	36,185,700	0	240	379,419,425
2通信機器	0	0	2	1,290,000	0	0	2	1,290,000	0	2	1,290,000
6試験及び測定機器	1	550,000	1	800,000	0	0	1	800,000	0	2	1,350,000
8産業機器	13	11,035,750	3	1,887,200	0	0	3	1,887,200	0	16	12,922,950
10車両及び軌条	187	276,067,375	23	39,618,000	23	27,414,000	0	12,204,000	0	187	288,271,375
11医療機器	17	27,991,100	1	22,990,000	1	3,608,500	0	19,381,500	0	17	47,372,600
13雑機器	15	27,589,500	1	623,000	0	0	1	623,000	0	16	28,212,500
国立国会図書館
庁用品
備品	80	118,916,664	13	10,909,400	5	4,618,400	8	6,291,000	0	88	125,207,664
2通信機器	2	1,557,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	1,557,000
8産業機器	22	29,974,597	2	1,300,000	0	0	2	1,300,000	0	24	31,274,597
10車両及び軌条	13	15,577,900	2	2,560,000	2	2,103,400	0	456,600	0	13	16,034,500
11医療機器	3	3,046,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	3,046,000
13雑機器	40	68,791,167	9	7,049,400	3	2,515,000	6	4,534,400	0	46	73,295,567
合計	313	462,150,389	44	78,117,600	29	35,640,900	15	42,476,700	0	328	504,627,089
品目別内訳
2通信機器	2	1,557,000	2	1,290,000	0	0	2	1,290,000	0	4	2,847,000
6試験及び測定機器	1	550,000	1	800,000	0	0	1	800,000	0	2	1,350,000
衆議院所管 一般会計 物品増減及び現在額報告書 （3）

分類及び細分類	品目	昭和52年度末現在(A)	昭和53年度間減(B)	昭和53年度末現在(A±B)
増(a)	減(b)	差引(a-b)	価格改定による増又は減(円)
数(個)	価(円)	数(個)	価(円)	数(個)	価(円)	数(個)	価(円)
8産業機器	35	41,010,347	5	3,187,200	0	0	5	3,187,200	0	40	44,197,547
10車両及び軌条	200	291,645,275	25	42,178,000	25	29,517,400	0	12,660,600	0	200	304,305,875
11医療機器	20	31,037,100	1	22,990,000	1	3,608,500	0	19,381,500	0	20	50,418,600
13雑機器	55	96,350,667	10	7,672,400	3	2,515,000	7	5,157,400	0	62	101,508,067
昭和53年度参議院所管一般会计物品增減及び現在額報告書
分類及び細分類	品目	昭和52年度末現在(A)	昭和53年度間減(B)	昭和53年度末現在(A±B)
増(a)	減(b)	差引(a-b)	価格改定による増又は減(円)
数量(個)	価格(円)	数量(個)	価格(円)	数量(個)	価格(円)	数量(個)	価格(円)
参議院
庁用品
備品	161	252,358,898	18	34,451,500	17	17,334,750	1	17,116,750	296,700	162	269,772,348
2通信機器	1	1,619,700	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1,619,700
6試験及び測定機器	1	1,000,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1,000,000
8産業機器	1	900,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	900,000
10車両及び軌条	115	165,952,350	15	24,902,000	15	15,777,000	0	9,125,000	0	115	175,077,350
11医療機器	19	42,367,148	1	838,000	1	599,750	0	238,250	0	19	42,605,398
13雑機器	24	40,519,700	2	8,711,500	1	958,000	1	7,753,500	296,700	25	48,569,900
裁判官弾劾裁判所
庁用品
備品	2	2,143,500	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	2,143,500
10車両及び軌条	1	1,153,500	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1,153,500
13雑機器	1	990,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	990,000
合計	163	254,502,398	18	34,451,500	17	17,334,750	1	17,116,750	296,700	164	271,915,848
品目別内訳
2通信機器	1	1,619,700	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1,619,700
6試験及び測定機器	1	1,000,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1,000,000
8産業機器	1	900,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	900,000
10車両及び軌条	116	167,105,850	15	24,902,000	15	15,777,000	0	9,125,000	0	116	176,230,850
11医療機器	19	42,367,148	1	838,000	1	599,750	0	238,250	0	19	42,605,398
13雑機器	25	41,509,700	2	8,711,500	1	958,000	1	7,753,500	296,700	26	49,559,900
昭和53年度裁判所所管一般会计物品增减及び現在額報告書
分類及び細分類	品目	昭和52年度末現在(A)	昭和53年度間增減(B)	昭和53年度末現在(A±B)
増(a)	減(b)	差引(a-b)	価格改定による増又は減(円)
数量(個)	価格(円)	数量(個)	価格(円)	数量(個)	価格(円)	数量(個)	価格(円)
庁用品	735	867,802,183	185	244,533,300	157	171,105,138	28	73,428,162	1,458,100	763	942,688,445
1電気機器	43	31,025,485	8	4,450,000	9	4,950,000	△1	△500,000	0	42	30,525,485
2通信機器	2	5,407,288	0	0	1	607,288	△1	△607,288	0	1	4,800,000
6試験及び測定機器	1	1,950,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1,950,000
8産業機器	16	34,236,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	16	34,236,000
10車両及び軌条	582	660,105,150	130	196,775,250	130	155,860,850	0	40,914,400	1,416,100	582	702,435,650
11医療機器	14	32,265,600	2	3,368,550	0	0	2	3,368,550	0	16	35,634,150
13雑機器	77	102,812,660	45	39,939,500	17	9,687,000	28	30,252,500	42,000	105	133,107,160
昭和53年度会計検査院所管一般会計物品増減及び現在額報告書
分類及び細分類	品目	昭和52年度末現在(A)	昭和53年度間増減(B)	昭和53年度末現在(A±B)
増(a)	減(b)	差引(a-b)	価格改定による増又は減(円)
数量(個)	価格(円)	数量(個)	価格(円)	数量(個)	価格(円)	数量(個)	価格(円)	数(個)	価格(円)
会計検査院庁用品
備品	54	96,883,350	3	4,548,000	3	3,968,000	0	580,000	0	54	97,463,350
1電気機器	8	10,503,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	8	10,503,000
2通信機器	1	19,429,550	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	19,429,550
8産業機器	11	10,400,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	11	10,400,000
10車両及び軌条	28	42,667,600	3	4,548,000	3	3,968,000	0	580,000	0	28	43,247,600
11医療機器	2	2,880,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	2,880,000
13雑機器	4	11,003,200	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	11,003,200
昭和53年度内閣所管一般会計物品增減及び現在額報告書
分類及び細分類	品目	昭和52年度末現在(A)	昭和53年度間減(B)	昭和53年度末現在(A±B)
増(a)	減(b)	差引(a-b)	価格改定による増又は減(円)	数量(個)	価格(円)
数(個)	価(円)	数(個)	価(円)	数(個)	価(円)	数(個)	価(円)
内閣官房
庁用品
備品	29	94,341,406	10	28,978,000	8	22,207,500	2	6,770,500	0	31	101,111,906
10車両及び軌条	21	85,672,776	7	14,803,000	6	8,607,500	1	6,195,500	0	22	91,868,276
13雑機器	8	8,668,630	3	14,175,000	2	13,600,000	1	575,000	0	9	9,243,630
内閣法制局
庁用品
備品	10	13,333,090	1	2,098,000	1	1,114,500	0	983,500	0	10	14,316,590
10車両及び軌条	8	11,084,090	1	2,098,000	1	1,114,500	0	983,500	0	8	12,067,590
13雑機器	2	2,249,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	2,249,000
人事院
庁用品
備品	42	53,100,250	6	4,564,000	3	2,847,500	3	1,716,500	0	45	54,816,750
2通信機器	1	730,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	730,000
10車両及び軌条	26	36,094,850	1	1,848,000	1	1,069,500	0	778,500	0	26	36,873,350
11医療機器	3	3,562,700	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	3,562,700
13雑機器	12	12,712,700	5	2,716,000	2	1,778,000	3	938,000	0	15	13,650,700
国防会議
庁用品
備品
(8) 内閣所管 一般会計 物品増減及び現在額報告書

分類及び細分類	品目	昭和52年度末現在(A)	昭和53年度間減(B)	昭和53年度末現在(A±B)
増(a)	減(b)	差引(a-b)	価格改定による増又は減(円)
数(個)	価(円)	数(個)	価(円)	数(個)	価(円)	数(個)	価(円)
10車両及び軌条	3	5,300,500	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	5,300,500
合計	84	166,075,246	17	35,640,000	12	26,169,500	5	9,470,500	0	89	175,545,746
品目別内訳
2通信機器	1	730,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	730,000
10車両及び軌条	58	138,152,216	9	18,749,000	8	10,791,500	1	7,957,500	0	59	146,109,716
11医療機器	3	3,562,700	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	3,562,700
13雑機器	22	23,630,330	8	16,891,000	4	15,378,000	4	1,513,000	0	26	25,143,330
昭和53年度総理府所管一般会計物品増減及び現在額報告書
分類及び細分類	品目	昭和52年度末現在(A)	昭和53年度間増減(B)	昭和53年度末現在(A±B)
増(a)	減(b)	差引(a-b)	価格改定による増又は減(円)
数(個)	価格(円)	数(個)	価格(円)	数(個)	価格(円)	数(個)	価格(円)
総理本府
庁用品	570	739,563,450	20	40,981,400	10	15,636,000	10	25,345,400	0	580	764,908,850
備品	164	272,275,050	17	28,006,400	10	15,636,000	7	12,370,400	0	171	284,645,450
6試験及び測定機器	4	11,210,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	11,210,000
8産業機器	5	10,595,500	1	1,020,000	1	4,410,000	0	△	3,390,000	0	5	7,205,500
10車両及び軌条	60	102,070,600	7	15,700,000	7	8,736,500	0	6,963,500	0	60	109,034,100
11医療機器	17	34,442,050	1	2,166,900	0	0	1	2,166,900	0	18	36,608,950
13雑機器	78	113,956,900	8	9,119,500	2	2,489,500	6	6,630,000	0	84	120,586,900
迎賓館用品
13雑機器	406	467,288,400	3	12,975,000	0	0	3	12,975,000	0	409	480,263,400
青少年対策本部
庁用品
備品	4	7,534,000	3	1,757,000	1	3,290,000	2	△	1,533,000	0	6	6,001,000
10車両及び軌条	3	6,596,000	0	0	1	3,290,000	△	△	3,290,000	0	2	3,306,000
13雑機器	1	938,000	3	1,757,000	0	0	3	1,757,000	0	4	2,695,000
北方対策本部
庁用品
備品
13雑機器	1	598,240	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	598,240
日本学術会議
日本学術会議用品