Silviase/jgov_v1.4_full_ann huggingface dataset:
## Chart II-24 Implementation of Okinawa Infectious Diseases Initiative (IDI) (FY 2000-2002)

Bank. Relevant projects were approved later.

In addressing bird flu, Japan provided Vietnam with medicine (100,000 Tamiflu tablets) and diagnosis kits in February 2004. Later, Japan supplied Cambodia and Indonesia with animal diagnosis systems for domestic animals, vaccines and other materials for the prevention of the epidemic. Laos with anti-virus protection equipment and diagnosis laboratory materials, and Thailand with virus diagnosis technology experts. In March 2004, Japan decided to extend emergency grant aid to the four countries through the FAO for purchases of diagnosis materials and infection prevention materials including masks.

## (g) Partnership

In combating infectious diseases, Japan has positively formed partnerships with UNICEF, the WHO, UNAIDS and other international organizations, as well as other donor countries including the United States. Funds established with Japan's financial contributions have been used for combating HIV/AIDS and other infectious diseases. They include the "United Nations Human Security Fund," the "Japan Trust Fund for HIV/AIDS" at the IPPF (International Planned Parenthood Federation), an international nongovernmental organization, the "Human Resources Development Fund" at UNESCO and the "Japan Social Development Fund" at the World Bank. As for the GFATM, Japan has provided financial contributions (see Part II, Chapter 2, Section 3, 1-(2)) as

Total: $2.45 billion (at the end of FY 2002)

explained earlier and has become a member of the Board, the supreme decision-making body for the GFATM, to exercise its influence as the largest donor country in Asia. In fact, Japan lacks an understanding of the threats of the three largest infectious diseases and the GFATM largely goes unsung. In order to promote people's understanding about the activities of the GFATM and the threats of infectious diseases and promote cooperation with East Asian countries in combating infectious diseases, Japan launched a domestic committee to support the GFATM in June 2004. The first committee of its kind in the world is named "Friends of the Global Fund, Japan," comprising former Prime Minister Yoshiro Mori as chairman and representatives from the field of academia, business, the non-profit sphere, and government (see page 86 of ODA White Paper 2003 for details of the global fund).

Japan has also been promoting infectious diseases control in the ASEAN region where Japanese infectious diseases control experiences can be easily applied. In this respect, Japan has launched the "Japan-ASEAN Information and Human Network for Infectious Diseases Control" to combat HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and parasitic diseases.

## (3) Population

The world population has doubled over the past 50 years and exceeds 6.3 billion $ ^{19} $ at present. The population problem is a global issue that is related to environment, food security, and energy problems. Particularly, in many developing coun-
# Chart II -26 Commitment in Disaster-Related Assistance

FY 2003

(On an exchange of note basis)

Disaster category	¥billion
Soil erosion	16.7
Droughts	7.2
Risk management for roads	3.3
Typhoon disasters	2.2
Earthquakes	1.8
Floods	1.5
Disaster prevention information	0.6
Total	33.3

Note: As the figures in the table are rounded off, they do not necessarily add up to the totals.

supply but also the promotion of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), $ ^{20} $ energy savings and renewable energy sources.

## (6) Disaster Prevention and Post-Disaster Restoration

Disasters are various, including floods, droughts, typhoons and earthquakes. Large-scale disasters not only take lives and destroy property but also have a long-term serious impact on economic and social systems. Disasters are global issues emerging in various forms around the world almost every year. In developing countries, disasters affect primarily the vulnerable poor and deteriorate sanitary conditions. They are linked closely to poverty, health and other problems, hampering sustainable development. In order to accurately address disasters and minimize damage to developing countries' economic and social systems vulnerable to disasters, Japan has taken advantage of excellent traditional and advanced technology developed through its own disaster experiences and of knowledge accumulated through its people's high-level disaster-prevention consciousness to provide high-quality assistance to developing countries.

In disaster-related assistance, Japan has emphasized not only post-disaster restoration, including emergency aid in the immediate aftermath of disasters, but also hard and soft disaster prevention measures, including human resources development. In fiscal year 2003, Japan provided approximately 33.3 billion yen in aid for 53 projects, including 15.1 billion yen in loan aid for two projects (against soil erosion) and 18.2 billion yen in grant aid for 51 projects. A breakdown, as illustrated in Chart II-26, indicates that while loan aid for measures against soil erosion accounts for a high portion of anti-disaster aid in fiscal year 2003, the overall cooperation for disaster management covers measures against various disasters.

An unpaved road blocked by a landslide: Morocco
Note: Assistance for various projects related to mine clearance, victim assistance, and mine risk education

and small missiles, which are said to cause more than 90% of civil war casualties. These weapons pose a very serious humanitarian problem that greatly impedes the reconstruction and development of those countries.

## (a) Measures to Clear Landmines

Japan has been actively supporting mine clearance since then. Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi announced the "Zero Victims Program" at the signing ceremony of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and On Their Destruction (Ottawa Convention) in Ottawa in December 1997. Then Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi expressed his idea that a comprehensive approach is indispensable, based on the realization of the universal and effective ban on landmines and strengthening of assistance for mine clearance and victim assistance. Japan announced its intention to provide assistance of approximately 10 billion yen over a period of five years from 1998 to support mine clearance and victim assistance under the above-mentioned Program. Japan achieved the promised amount in October 2002. In fiscal year 2003, Japan continued to provide bilateral support through financial assistance to international organizations, grant assistance to solve problems related to antipersonnel landmines, Grant Assistance-Grassroots/Human Security Projects, and Grant Assistance for Japanese NGO Projects. In addition, since September 2003, Japan has co-chaired the Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies, which was established under the Ottawa Convention. In March 2004, Japan took the initiative in holding the "Tokyo Seminar on Landmines," at which representatives of mine affected countries, landmine victims, and international NGOs, etc., attended and had a lively exchange of views. Japan will continue to advocate the elimination of landmines from the world and to actively assist mine action from the viewpoint of development as well as humanity.

## (b) Collecting SALW

In collaboration with related organizations, Japan has been carrying out the "project for collecting small arms and light weapons," which is a comprehensive project not only to collect SALW but also to remove the reasons for possessing such SALW. In Cambodia, Japan has been implementing the "Weapons for Development Project" in cooperation with the Government of Cambodia and local governments. Through the Project, social infrastructure that local residents need such as roads, wells, bridges, and schools are built and repaired in return for collection of SALW. In addition, this Project assists the governments in establishing a system for the management and registration of SALW. Under this Project, approximately 1,000 small arms were collected in September 2003. The number of SALW collected by the end of 2004 added up to 9,000. In Kosovo, Japan has been carrying out the Project for collecting SALW in collaboration with UNDP. Japan will continue to play a leading role in dealing with the issue of SALW by using its experience of SALW collection in Cambodia.
Chart II-29 Japan's ODA Disbursements to East Asia

Rank	Country or region	(Net disbursement basis, $ million)
Grant	Total	Yen loans, etc.	Total
Grant aid	Technical cooperation
1	Indonesia	82.36	120.66	203.02	938.76	1,141.78
2	China	72.63	300.13	372.76	386.96	759.72
3	Philippines	69.72	91.53	161.25	367.53	528.78
4	Viet Nam	53.18	83.63	136.81	347.43	484.24
5	Cambodia	76.68	41.24	117.92	7.96	125.88
6	Laos	51.56	34.00	85.55	0.45	86.00
7	Malaysia	0.57	45.77	46.34	32.81	79.15
8	Mongolia	30.93	23.76	54.69	12.58	67.27
9	Myanmar	18.52	24.56	43.08	-	43.08
10	East Timor	3.31	5.62	8.93	-	8.93
11	Thailand	3.00	73.85	76.85	-1,079.06	-1,002.22
Others	0.00	70.42	70.42	-499.15	-428.74
East Asia Total	462.46	915.16	1,377.62	516.28	1,893.89

Note:(1)The geographic division was made based on the classification by the Foreign Ministry.

(2) Includes graduated countries.

(3) As the figures in the table are rounded off, they do not necessarily add up to the totals.

basic human needs of citizens, and also to promote other social development activities. In addition, Japan assisted those countries to enhance economic infrastructures such as roads and electricity distribution networks. Japan has been providing assistance to Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, and

Senior Vice Foreign Minister Masatoshi Abe visiting the Saori Creative Center, which provides facilities for the handicapped. (Developing vocational opportunities and creative activities for people with disabilities and commercializing hill-tribes peoples' crafts in Thailand)

Malaysia mainly in the form of Yen loans mostly for the enhancement of economic and social infrastructure. As a result, goods, people, and information flow in the ASEAN region more smoothly than before. Moreover, Japan has promoted cooperation among the ASEAN member countries in addition to bilateral assistance. Japan also actively promoted South-South cooperation under a Partnership Program $ ^{*1} $ Agreement concluded with Singapore, Thailand, and the Philippines. These efforts have been made for the purpose of strengthening the unification of ASEAN. Furthermore, Japan puts a high priority on the promotion of Asia-Africa cooperation. For example, Japan invited people from African countries to Asian countries and provided them with training there in an attempt to help African countries improve productivity. This type of training is called third-country training.

## $ ^{*} $ I: Partnership Program

This is a framework in which countries that have attained certain development levels thanks to assistance from Japan offer technical cooperation in collaboration with Japan to less developed neighboring countries whose languages, histories, and cultures, etc., are the same or similar to theirs. As of July 2004, Japan concluded a Partnership Program Agreement with 11 countries, namely, Singapore, Thailand, Egypt, Tunisia, Chile, Brazil, Argentina, the Philippines, Morocco, Mexico, and Indonesia.
Chart II -33 Japan's ODA Disbursements to Africa

Rank	Country or Region	Grant	Total	Yen loans, etc.	Total
Grant aid	Technical cooperation
1	Tanzania	53.90	22.32	76.22	-1.76	74.47
2	Ethiopia	45.21	11.32	56.53	-	56.53
3	Mozambique	32.53	3.14	35.67	-0.40	35.27
4	Angola	32.66	0.44	33.10	-	33.10
5	Malawi	20.94	14.01	34.95	-3.54	31.41
6	Ghana	15.54	14.22	29.75	-	29.75
7	Senegal	19.59	15.61	35.20	-6.52	28.68
8	Zambia	19.55	16.45	36.00	-7.68	28.32
9	Mauritania	19.33	4.61	23.94	-0.02	23.93
10	Guinea	20.27	3.37	23.64	-2.81	20.83
11	South Africa	11.11	7.94	19.06	-1.44	17.61
12	Mali	11.89	3.00	14.89	-0.84	14.05
13	Niger	8.37	5.89	14.25	-0.60	13.66
14	Cape Verde	10.81	0.96	11.77	-	11.77
15	Eritrea	11.01	0.73	11.74	-	11.74
16	Cameroon	9.75	1.03	10.79	-	10.79
17	Burkina Faso	3.90	6.69	10.58	-	10.58
18	Madagascar	6.47	4.55	11.01	-1.31	9.70
19	Uganda	3.14	6.39	9.54	-	9.54
20	Gambia	5.68	3.18	8.86	-	8.86
21	Djibouti	6.08	1.97	8.06	-	8.06
22	Nigeria	17.91	2.32	20.24	-13.84	6.40
23	Benin	4.02	2.25	6.27	-	6.27
24	Swaziland	1.82	2.18	4.00	1.02	5.02
25	Zimbabwe	0.08	4.93	5.01	-	5.01
26	Lesotho	2.48	1.53	4.01	-	4.01
27	Sierra Leone	3.69	0.04	3.73	-	3.73
28	Mauritius	3.54	0.56	4.10	-1.18	2.92
29	Côte d'Ivoire	0.40	2.05	2.44	-	2.44
30	Gabon	0.37	1.70	2.07	-0.31	1.77
31	Central Africa	1.40	0.32	1.73	-	1.73
32	São Tomé and Príncipe	1.34	0.02	1.37	-	1.37
33	Botswana	2.78	2.79	5.58	-4.31	1.27
34	Namibia	0.14	0.68	0.82	-	0.82
35	Seychelles	-	0.68	0.68	-	0.68
36	Rwanda	0.45	0.24	0.69	-0.04	0.66
37	Congo, Democratic Republic of (formerly Zaire)	0.32	0.31	0.63	-	0.63
38	Togo	0.03	0.30	0.34	-	0.34
39	Chad	0.04	0.23	0.26	-	0.26
40	Congo	-	0.10	0.10	-	0.10
41	Burundi	-	0.09	0.09	-	0.09
42	Guinea-Bissau	-	0.06	0.06	-	0.06
43	Equatorial Guinea	-	0.03	0.03	-	0.03
44	Comoros	-	0.00	0.00	-	0.00
45	Liberia	-	0.00	0.00	-	0.00
46	Kenya	17.19	26.14	43.33	-49.92	-6.59
Others	-	2.31	2.31	-	2.31
Africa Total	425.77	199.69	625.46	-95.48	529.98

Note: (1) The geographic division was made based on the classification by the Foreign Ministry.

(2) As the figures in the table are rounded off, they do not necessarily add up to the totals.
## Chart II -35 Japan's ODA Disbursements to Latin America

2003

(Net disbursement basis, $ million)

Rank	Country or region	Grant	Yen loans, etc.	Total
Grant aid	Technical cooperation	Total
1	Peru	4.27	11.37	15.64	89.26	104.90
2	Brazil	2.03	33.17	35.20	57.01	92.21
3	Guatemala	20.10	9.97	30.07	7.34	37.40
4	Bolivia	12.75	21.61	34.36	-2.04	32.32
5	Honduras	19.74	12.25	31.99	-	31.99
6	Dominican Republic	8.82	13.07	21.89	8.72	30.61
7	Nicaragua	20.48	9.32	29.80	-5.42	24.38
8	El Salvador	3.73	11.85	15.58	5.79	21.37
9	Paraguay	1.49	17.90	19.38	0.83	20.22
10	Argentina	-	15.32	15.32	-3.74	11.58
11	Mexico	2.52	23.77	26.29	-14.99	11.30
12	Panama	2.65	11.76	14.41	-6.04	8.37
13	Ecuador	8.83	7.15	15.99	-8.67	7.32
14	Chile	1.83	9.76	11.59	-4.51	7.07
15	Grenada	6.89	0.12	7.00	-	7.00
16	Cuba	1.01	4.78	5.79	-	5.79
17	Haiti	4.06	0.67	4.73	-	4.73
18	Saint Lucia	2.81	0.98	3.79	-	3.79
19	Venezuela	0.14	3.40	3.54	-0.01	3.53
20	Guyana	2.39	0.46	2.85	-	2.85
21	Antigua and Barbuda	1.92	0.82	2.74	-	2.74
22	Dominica	1.81	0.48	2.29	-	2.29
23	Trinidad and Tobago	0.11	2.12	2.23	-	2.23
24	Uruguay	-	3.77	3.77	-1.67	2.11
25	Saint Vincent	0.23	0.88	1.12	-	1.12
26	Barbados	-	0.85	0.85	-	0.85
27	Belize	0.08	0.66	0.73	-	0.73
28	Suriname	0.17	0.48	0.65	-	0.65
29	(Montserrat)	-	0.05	0.05	-	0.05
30	Saint Christopher and Nevis	-	0.01	0.01	-	0.01
31	Costa Rica	0.92	5.63	6.56	-10.80	-4.24
32	Colombia	6.48	5.54	12.01	-19.23	-7.22
33	Jamaica	0.97	3.33	4.31	-15.71	-11.41
Others	-	5.23	5.23	-	5.23
Latin America Total	139.23	248.52	387.75	76.12	463.87

(2) As the figures in the table are rounded off, they do not necessarily add up to the totals.

Note: (1) The geographic division was made based on the classification by the Foreign Ministry. The parentheses indicate the name of a region.

Instructor and Personnel Training Center for Industrial Development of Central America (technical cooperation project)" in Costa Rica and the "Caribbean Disaster Management (technical cooperation project)," which is designed to provide CARICOM member countries, Barbados, Saint Vincent and Trinidad and Tobago, with assistance for disaster management by helping the countries prepare hazard maps for floods, landslides, volcano eruptions, and earthquakes in an effort to enhance their disaster management capabilities. In addition, Japan has given relatively developed countries including Brazil, Argentina, and Chile comprehensive assistance such as South-South Cooperation. In October 2003, Mexican
# Chart II -38 Meetings Held by ODA-Related Ministries and Agencies in FY 2003

Council of Overseas Economic Cooperation-Related Ministers
The 13th meeting	August 28, 2003	Revision of the ODA Charter
Inter-Ministerial Meeting on ODA
The 8th meeting	August 19, 2003	1. Revision of the ODA Charter2. ODA budget request for FY20043. Report on donations and investments in international organizations4. Others
The 9th meeting	November 6, 2003	1. Report on the International Donors Conference for the Reconstruction of Iraq2. Explanation about Japan's policy for assistance to Iraq3. Security situation in Iraq4. Others
Bureau Meeting for Inter-Ministerial Meeting on ODA
The 4th meeting	October 23, 2003	1. Explanation about the ODA White Paper 20032. Country Assistance Programs for Viet Nam and Sri Lanka3. Assistance for the reconstruction of Iraq4. Reports from the Experts Meeting on Financial Cooperation, Experts Meeting of Technical Cooperation, and Inter-Ministerial Meeting on ODA Evaluation.
Experts Meeting on Financial Cooperation
The 5th meeting	April 25, 2003	1. Financial assistance to China2. Local systems and localization
The 6th meeting	June 16, 2003	1. Financial assistance to Thailand and Cambodia2. Collaboration
The 7th meeting	July 31, 2003	Financial assistance to Malaysia and the Philippines
The 8th meeting	September 8, 2003	1. Financial assistance to Pakistan2. Systems, policy environment evaluation, and desirable assistance
The 9th meeting	October 30, 2003	Desirable financial assistance in preparation for the ASEAN-Japan Commemorative Summit Meeting (regarding the Mekong region development and human resources development in the ASEAN region)
The 10th meeting	November 28, 2003	1. Financial assistance to Central Asia2. Loans based on policies
The 11th meeting	January 22, 2004	1. Financial assistance to North African countries (Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria, Egypt)2. Consultative Group on Indonesia3. CDM
The 12th meeting	February 24, 2004	Financial assistance to Mongolia and India
The 13th meeting	March 25, 2004	1. Collaboration2. Financial assistance provided in this fiscal year and plan for the future3. Financial support
Experts Meeting of Technical Cooperation
The 1st meeting	August 22, 2003	1. The role of the Experts Meeting of Technical Cooperation2. Basic policy for the request for the estimated budget of JICA for FY 20043. Basic policy for budget requests for FY 2004 for technical cooperation provided under the jurisdiction of ministries and agencies
The 2nd meeting	March 19, 2004	1. Organization Reform of JICA2. Others
Inter-Ministerial Meeting on ODA Evaluation
April 25, 2003	Compilation of major results of the ODA evaluations conducted by ministries and agencies
Overseas Economic Cooperation Operations Management Council
November 11, 2003	1. Recent achievements2. Budget for FY 20043. Implementation of the environment guidelines
## 平成21年度以降に競争性のある契約に移行予定のもの（平成20年度下半期分）

(府省名: 宮内庁)

契約名称及び内容	契約担当官等の氏名並びにその所属する部局の名称及び所在地	契約締結日	契約の相手方の商号又は名称及び住所	随意契約によることとした会計法令の根拠条文及び理由	予定価格	契約金額	落札率	再就職の役員の数	移行困難な事由	移行予定年限	備考
該当なし。
# 活力創出に資する機能の状況

## 節

### 1. 業務機能の状況

最近のオフィス需給動向～東京都区部の空室率の動向～

都区部の賃貸事務所の空室率は、平成15年の東京都区部における大規模ビルの大量供給により、平成15年には6.9%にまで達していた。しかし、それ以降は景気回復に起因するオフィス需要の増加により、平成18年末においては、200千坪程度の新規供給があったにも関わらず、空室率は2.6%となっており、過去十年間で最低の空室率となっている。

一方、一定の規模や設備を有する優良ビル $ ^{1)} $ の空室率については、非常に低い率で推移しているが、5年ぶりに上昇となっている。空室率が上昇した要因としては、優良ビルの竣工面積の増加があるが、対前年比0.3ポイントの微小な上昇幅であり、依然として、優良物件の品溝感が継続しており、テナントの受け皿が確保し難い状況である。

図表2-2-1 空室率と新規供給面積の推移

注：新規供給面積は年間の値、空室率は各年12月時点の値（東京23区）

資料：(株)生駒データサービスシステム資料により国土交通省国土計画局作成
## 2 ．産業機能の状況

## （１）首都圏における産業の成長

「首都圈整備計画」（平成18年9月国土交通大臣決定）では、首都圈が目標とする社会や生活の姿の一つとして「我が国の活力創出に資する自由な活動の場の整備」を掲げており、これからの首都圈整備においては、個人・組織による多様な経済的・社会的活動が展開しやすい場の形成が重要としている。

日本経済における首都圏経済の位置付けを見ると、首都圏は全国のGDPの3分の1超を占めている（図表2-2-2）。また、圏域内の総生産における産業のシェアを見ると、第3次産業が大きなウェイトを占めている（図表2-2-3）。

図表2-2-2 全国のGDPに対する首都圏のシェアと実額

資料：「県民経済計算」（内閣府）により国土交通省国土計画局作成

図表2-2-3 首都圏の圏域総生産における第3次産業のシェア

注：圈域の値は、首都圏の各都県の値を単純合計した。また、総生産は、第1次から第3次産業の総計とした。資料：「県民経済計算」（内閣府）により国土交通省国土計画局作成
## （２）ソフト系ＩＴ産業の集積動向

新規参入や業態変化等の動向の早いIT産業の中でも、主にソフトウェアやホームページデザイン等を扱うソフト系IT産業 $ ^{1)} $ は、他産業に比べ参入が容易であることやインターネットが急速に普及したことに伴い、平成11年頃には「ITバブル」と呼ばれるほど活発な参入が行われ、その後も堅調に事業所数を伸ばしてきている。今後の新産業の立地動向を把握する上で、ソフト系IT産業がどのように分布し、集積し、発展していくかについて大きな関心が持たれる。

以下では、ソフト系IT産業の全国の動向と日本最大のソフト系IT産業の集積地である東京都山手線沿線における動向について紹介する。

## ①全国及び首都圏のソフト系ＩＴ産業の動向（平成18年4月～9月期）

全国のソフト系IT産業の事業所数は、平成16年4月～9月期以来、増加傾向が続いていた。今回の平成18年4月～9月期調査でも増加傾向は続いており、調査を開始した平成11年10月～平成12年3月期以来、最大の事業所数となった（図表2-2-4）。

地域別では、平成18年4月～9月期には埼玉県、千葉県、東京都及び神奈川県といった首都圏南部においてインターネット関連サービスの事業所数の増加が目立った（図表2-2-5）。

図表2-2-4 ソフト系IT産業の開廃業率の推移

資料：国土交通省国土計画局調べ
図表2-2-5 事業所数の伸び率

注：事業所数の伸び率は平成18年4月～9月の半年間のもの

資料：国土交通省国土計画局調べ

## ②東京都心部の状況（山手線周辺を中心とした集積の動向）

東京都23区のソフト系IT産業の事業所数は増加傾向にあり、その中で東京都山手線周辺の主要なターミナル駅から半径1km圏内にあるソフト系IT産業の事業所数の過去1年間（平成17年10月～平成18年9月）の伸びを見てみると、秋葉原、神田、九段下から茅場町、銀座、浜松町にかけての山手線東部地域で、引き続き堅調な事業所数の伸びがみられた。一方で、山手線西部地域では、従来、全般的に事業所数が減少していたが、平成17年3月～9月期調査以来、池袋、新宿、渋谷、恵比寿周辺等を中心に増加に転じており、今期の調査においてもこの傾向は続いている。このように山手線周辺におけるソフト系IT産業の事業所数は、これまでは東部を中心に増加していたが、西部でも立地の動きが活発になってきていることがうかがえる（図表2-2-6）。

図表2-2-6 基準駅から半径1 km圏内の事業所数とその伸び率～山手線周辺

平成15年10月～平成16年9月時点

資料：国土交通省国土計画局調べ

平成17年10月～平成18年9月時点
## （３）工業機能の状況

## ①工業出荷額等の動向

首都圏における製造業は、平成16年に事業所数が対前年比で8.4%減、従業者数が2.0%減となり、製造品出荷額が2.2%増となった。首都圏で最も事業所が多い東京都では、事業所数は前年比で、10.6%減と大きく減少したものの、製造品出荷額等は0.9%減と比較的減少幅が小さかった（図表2-2-7）。

図表2-2-7 首都圏の製造業の事業所数等

事業所数	従業者数	製造品出荷額等
実数	前年比(%)	実数	前年比(%)	実数	前年比(%)
全 国	270,906	▲7.8	8,113,676	▲1.4	284,418,266	3.9
首都圈合計	75,480	▲8.4	2,211,890	▲2.0	83,070,137	2.2
茨 城	6,803	▲6.1	267,025	1.3	10,437,338	3.6
栃 木	5,655	▲8.4	203,200	▲1.1	8,041,183	4.4
群 馬	6,668	▲8.0	213,218	▲0.9	7,600,404	4.3
埼 玉	15,355	▲7.7	421,231	▲2.0	13,568,986	3.8
千 葉	6,505	▲7.5	217,332	▲2.1	11,257,573	3.4
東 京	21,035	▲10.6	392,609	▲5.2	11,198,997	▲0.9
神 奈 川	10,966	▲7.3	421,464	▲2.5	18,565,988	▲1.0
山 梨	2,493	▲9.4	75,811	0.8	2,399,668	7.2

注：従業員が4人以上の事業所。

資料：「平成16年度工業統計表」（経済産業省）により国土交通省国土計画局作成

この背景には、日本経済が平成14年初めから回復を続けている中で、個々の企業は依然として厳しい競争にさらされていることが伺える。また、中小企業の高齢化が進み、後継者不足も事業所数の減少の背景の一つにあると考えられる。一方、工業品出荷額が増加しているのは、厳しい競争の中で技術力や商品開発力のある企業が増えてきていることが考えられる。

## ②工場等立地の動向

平成14年7月に廃止された「首都圏の既成市街地における工業等の制限に関する法律」の制度廃止前後に当たる平成13年末と平成16年末を比較すると、制度廃止後も埼玉県、東京都及び神奈川県 $ ^{1)} $ の製造業の事業所数及び従業者

図表2-2-8 埼玉県、東京都、神奈川県の製造業のシェア

平成13年末	平成14年末	平成15年末	平成16年末
製造業事業所数	55,766	50,951	51,974	47,356
(全国シェア)	(17.8%)	(17.5%)	(17.7%)	(17.5%)
製造業従業者数	1,395,701	1,300,097	1,276,295	1,235,304
(全国シェア)	(15.9%)	(15.6%)	(15.5%)	(15.2%)

注1：従業員が4人以上の事業所。

注2：調査は毎年12月31日現在で実施。

注3：平成13年末の数値については「新聞・印刷業」を除いた数値。

資料：「平成16年度工業統計表」（経済産業省）により国土交通省国土計画局作成

数は減少しており、全国シェアも低下傾向にある（図表2-2-8）。平成17年度の工場立地動向調査によると、埼玉県及び神奈川県の工場立地件数は16年度から引き続いての増加傾向、東京都の工場立地件数は若干の減少傾向にあり、新規に立地する工場も増えてきているものの、廃業や撤退する工場も多いものと考えられる。
## （４）農林水産業に関する機能の状況

首都圏の農業は、都市化の影響を受けながらも、世界最大規模の消費地に近いという有利性をいかし、全国有数の農業産出額をあげる県として茨城県（3位）、千葉県（4位）（平成17年産出額の全国順位）を有している。ここ数年をみると、首都圏全体の農業産出額については、平成13年からほぼ横ばいで推移しており、全国の2割程度となっている（図表2-2-9）。また、野菜については、東京都中央卸売市場に集まる野菜総取扱量の約38%（平成18年）を産出しており、新鮮で安全な農産物の供給という重要な役割を果たしている。平成18年度冬期は記録的な暖冬により、キャベツ、大根等の野菜の生産量が増加し、これにより前年同期に比べて著しく価格が安値低迷した。このため、首都圏野菜生産各地において産地廃棄等の対応がとられた。

また、農業の機能・役割を広く首都圏住民に理解してもらうため、地方公共団体・地元農家等による市民農園の開設など、農家と住民の交流を図る等の取組がなされている。

首都圏の林業は、林業産出額が継続して減少傾向にあり、平成17年度は365億円となっている（図表2-2-10）。このうち栃木県、群馬県の2県で首都圏全体の約6割を産出している。林業産出額を構成している木材生産・薪炭生産・栽培きのこ類・林野副産物採取の4項目のうち、首都圏全体の林業産出額の約6割が栽培きのこ類、約3割が木材生産となっており、木材生産の全国におけるシェア（約5割）と比べると低くなっている。

また、森林は多様な機能を有しており、これらの機能の維持・向上のためにも林業の持続的かつ健全な発展を図ることが必要である。そのため国産材の利用拡大を軸とした林業・木材産業の再生に向けた取組がなされており、首都圏でも森林組合等が参加して「顔の見える木材での家づくり」などが展開されている。

首都圏の水産業は、平成17年の漁業生産額（海面漁業・養殖業）が885億円で、全国の約6％となっており（図表2-2-11）、平成13年から15年にかけては減少傾向であるが、それ以降はほぼ横ばいに推移している。千葉県・東京都で首都圏全体の生産額の6割を占めている。

漁業の振興により、漁業が有する自然環境の保全等の公益的機能の維持・向上が図られる。首都圏においても漁業への理解を深めることを目的に、都市と漁村の交流等の取組が漁業関係者によりなされている。

図表2-2-9 首都圏における農業産出額の推移

資料：「生産農業所得統計」（農林水産省）により国土交通省国土計画局作成

図表2-2-10 首都圏における林業産出額の推移

資料：「生産林業所得統計」（農林水産省）により国土交通省国土計画局作成

図表2-2-11 首都圏における漁業生産額（海面漁業・養殖業）の推移

資料：「漁業養殖業生産統計」（農林水産省）により国土交通省国土計画局作成