Silviase/jgov_v1.4_full_ann huggingface dataset:
## 4 国産農林水産物の消費・輸出対策

## （１）農山漁村の所得増大対策

## ① 農林漁業成長産業化ファンドの本格始動 【財投資金】350億円

株式会社農林漁業成長産業化支援機構を通じ、生産・流通・加工等の産業間が連携した取組について、資本の提供と経営支援を一体的に実施(H24、25の総契約規模1,100億円)

(300億円)

## ② 6 次産業化支援対策

地産地消等の取組に必要な機械・施設の整備、農林漁業者と多様な事業者が連携して行う新商品開発・販路開拓・施設整備やそのサポート体制の整備、知的財産を活用した新しいビジネスモデル構築等を支援

52億円

(36億円)

## （２）農林水産物の輸出対策

## ① 輸出倍増プロジェクト

JETRO（ジェトロ）を活用した輸出のための相談、アドバイスなど川上から川下に至る総合的なサポート体制を構築し、地域の輸出拡大に向けた取組や販路開拓等を実施

## 16 億円

(10億円)

## ② 日本の食を広げるプロジェクト

現場発の発想で国産農林水産物の消費拡大を図るため、国産農林水産物・食品と多様なモノ・サービスとを結びつけつつ、地産地消の推進、国産消費の拡大、輸出の促進、日本食・食文化の発信等を推進

## ③ 漁港における高度衛生管理型施設の整備く公共>

60億円

(一)

- 輸出促進のための漁港における高度衛生管理型荷さばき所、岸壁等の整備を推進

763億円

の内数

(690億円

の内数)

## 5 生產振興対策

## ① 畜產・酪農経営安定対策

（所要額）1，740億円

- 畜種ごとの特性に応じて畜産・酪農経営の安定を支援し、意欲ある生産者が経営の継続・発展に取り組める環境を整備

(1,740億円)
② 飼料穀物備蓄対策 16億円

- 飼料穀物の供給途絶に対応するため、配合飼料の主原料である飼料穀物の備蓄を実施（14億円）

③ 野菜価格安定対策事業 （所要額） 160億円

生産者の経営安定を図るため、野菜の価格低落時における（159億円）生産者補給金の交付等を実施

④ 果樹・茶支援対策事業 68億円

果樹・茶の改植及びこれに伴う未収益期間に対する経営支援並びに果実の計画生産・出荷等を推進（67億円）

## ⑤ 甘味資源作物・国内産糖交付金等（所要額）542億円

国内産糖と輸入糖との内外コスト差を調整し、さとうきび（514億円）生産者等の経営安定を図るための交付金を交付

⑥ 鳥獣被害防止総合対策交付金 105億円

地域ぐるみの被害防止活動や侵入防止柵の整備、都道府県（95億円）が主導して行う広域捕獲活動等の取組を支援

## 6 再生可能エネルギーの大々的な展開

## ① 農山漁村再生可能エネルギー導入等促進対策 17 億円

- 農山漁村における再生可能エネルギー発電事業による収入を地域の農林漁業の発展に活用する取組の構想・計画策定等の推進、小水力発電等に係る調査設計等を支援

② 地域バイオマス産業化推進事業 24億円

地域のバイオマスを活用した産業化等に必要な施設整備等を支援

## ③ 木質バイオマス産業化促進 11 億円

木質バイオマスの利用促進に必要な施設の整備、全国的な調査・サポート体制の構築、技術開発等を支援
## 7 食の安全・安心、都市と農山漁村の共生・対流等

## ① 消費・安全対策交付金 22億円

• 国産農畜水産物の安全性向上や、家畜の伝染病・農作物の病害虫の発生予防・まん延防止に関する地域の取組を推進

② 家畜衛生総合対策 54 億円

・ 口蹄疫や鳥インフルエンザ等の家畜の伝染病に対する発生予防と万一の発生の場合のまん延防止対策を強化 (57億円)

## ③ 都市農村共生・対流総合対策交付金 37億円

子どもの農山漁村宿泊体験など都市と農山漁村の共生・対流を進める取組や人材の活用・育成、農産物加工・販売施設の整備等を支援

## ④ 農山漁村活性化プロジェクト支援交付金 30億円

農山漁村における定住・地域間交流を促進するための施設等の整備（41億円）

## ⑤ 食育の推進 10 億円

「食育基本法」に基づき、食料の生産から消費にわたる各段階で、食を選択できる力を身につけるための食育を国民運動として展開する取組等を推進

## ⑥ 「農」のある暮らしづくり交付金 10 億円

都市において、市民農園等の整備、新鮮な地元産農産物の提供、防災農地の保全など「農」のある暮らしづくりを支援

## 8 林業対策

① 森林整備事業＜公共＞（再揭）

1,296億円

(1,173億円)

② 治山事業＜公共＞（再揭）

6 3 6 億円

（5 7 5 億円）

③ 森林・林業再生基盤づくり交付金（再掲） 16億円

(一)

## ④ 森林・山村の多面的機能発揮対策 41 億円

- 森林の有する多面的機能の発揮や山村地域の活性化のため、地域における活動組織が実施する取組を支援
## ⑤ 持続的な森林経営の確立に向けた総合対策

地域の実情に応じた持続的な森林経営を確立するため、市町村等が中心となった協議会が実施する計画作成の取組や路網の改良を支援

⑥ 森林・林業人材育成対策 91億円

林業への就業前の青年に対する給付金を創設するとともに、「緑の雇用」事業の拡充等により人材の育成を推進

(61億円)

## 9 水產業対策

① 水產基盤整備事業＜公共＞（再揭）

7 6 3 億円

（6 9 0 億円）

② 強い水産業づくり交付金（再掲） 45億円 （45億円）

③ 資源管理・漁業経営安定対策 3 7 4 億円

• 資源管理に取り組む漁業者に対する共済・積立ぷらすを活用した収入安定対策、燃油高騰等に対するコスト対策を実施

## ④ 水産業・漁村の多面的機能発揮対策 45億円

・水産業・漁村の有する多面的機能の発揮のための取組等への支援

⑤ 国産水産物流通促進事業 11 億円

- 川下のニーズに即応した出荷や産地・消費地情報の一元化を図る取組、流通過程の各段階への個別指導、流通促進のための機器整備等を支援

## ⑥ 新規漁業就業者総合支援 12 億円

・ 漁業への就業前の青年に対する給付金の給付や、就業・定着促進等のための長期研修等を支援 (4億円)
White Paper on

Disaster Management 2011

Executive Summary

(Provisional Translation)

Cabinet Office, Government of Japan
Part 1 The Great East Japan Earthquake
Chapter 1 Overview of the Earthquake and Tsunami, and Countermeasures for Them
1-1-1 Overview of the earthquake and tsunami disaster
1-1-1-1 Overview of the earthquake and tsunami
1-1-1-2 Overview of the damage
1-1-1-3 Comparison with great disasters in the past
1-1-2 Emergency response
1-1-2-1 Initial response
1-1-2-2 Response to infrastructure and lifeline damage
1-1-2-3 Measures to assist the lives of afflicted people
1-1-2-4 Disaster waste disposal
1-1-2-5 Promotion of housing stabilization
1-1-2-6 Cordial support for disaster-stricken area
1-1-3 Policy measures since the disaster
1-1-3-1 Designation of a disaster of extreme severity
1-1-3-2 Designation of specified major disaster
1-1-3-3 Flexible application of the Disaster Relief Act
1-1-3-4 Tax measures
1-1-3-5 First supplementary budget
1-1-3-6 Special financial support by the Special Financial Support Act for the Great East Japan Earthquake
1-1-3-7 Special measures for building and construction
1-1-3-8 Improvement of the procedures for providing monetary aid under the Act on Support for Livelihood Recovery of Disaster Victims
1-1-4 The next steps
1-1-4-1 Measures for the normalization of lives in disaster-stricken areas
1-1-4-2 Toward reconstruction of disaster-stricken areas
1-1-4-3 Toward future disaster management and disaster risk reduction
Chapter 2 Overview of the Nuclear Disaster and Its Countermeasures
1-2-1 Overview of the nuclear disaster
1-2-1-1 Accident at Tokyo Electric Power Company Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
1-2-1-2 Accident at Tokyo Electric Power Company Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
1-2-2 Measures against the nuclear disaster
1-2-2-1 Establishment of Nuclear Disaster Management Headquarters
1-2-2-2 Evacuation of afflicted people and the order to designate evacuation zones
1-2-2-3 Emergency safety countermeasures
1-2-2-4 Working toward settling the nuclear power station accident
1-2-2-5 Working toward supporting afflicted people at each area
Part 2 Major Disasters Since 2010 and the Countermeasures for Them

Part 3 Overview of Measures Taken on Disaster Management in 2009 and Plans for Disaster Management in 2011

Chapter 1 Overview of Measures Taken on Disaster Management in 2009

Chapter 2 Plan for Disaster Management in 2011

Note: “The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake” refers to the earthquake hazard of magnitude 9.0 that occurred on 11 March. “The Great East Japan Earthquake” refers to the disaster caused by The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake and the accompanying accidents at nuclear power stations.
An accurate overall assessment of the extremely severe damage resulting in the Great East Japan Earthquake has yet not been figured out. Supporting the livelihood of afflicted people is still an unrealized priority. Recovery operations are still ongoing and the discussion for reconstruction has barely started. Moreover, the “Committee for Technical Investigation on Countermeasures for Earthquakes and Tsunami Based on the Lessons Learned from The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake” was established under the Central Disaster Management Council. Full inspections of the disaster and a subsequent study of lessons learned from the disaster will be conducted more intensively in future. In addition, regarding the accident at the nuclear power plant, maximum effort has been focused on settling the situation as quickly as possible. The “Committee for the Investigation and Verification of the Accident at the Tokyo Electric Power Company Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant” will conduct the investigation and verification of the accident.

Though we are only about halfway in the phase of recovery from this disaster, this white paper will cover the current situation (as of the end of May 2011) and the responses to it.

Chapter 1

Overview of the Earthquake and Tsunami, and Countermeasures for Them

1-1-1 Overview of the earthquake and tsunami disaster

### 1 -1-1-1. Overview of the earthquake and tsunami

On 11 March 2011, at 14:46, an earthquake of magnitude 9.0 occurred offshore at Sanriku, 130km east-southeast of the Ojika Peninsula. This was the largest earthquake observed in Japan's history.

⇒ Seismic intensity level was measured as 7 (maximum) in the northern area of Miyagi Prefecture. The seismic ground motion was observed in a wide area in Japan from Hokkaido to Kyushu, and was felt most acutely in East Japan.

○ The earthquake generated a massive tsunami.

Figure 1. Seismic intensity of the Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake

* The recorded maximum height of the tsunami tide was 9.3m (Soma City, Fukushima Prefecture)
⇒ Large tsunami waves were observed all over Japan.

There is a possibility that the source region includes six zones for long-term risk assessment conducted by the Earthquake Research Committee of the Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion.

⇒ The scale and probability of earthquakes in each of the above six zones have been assessed. However, an earthquake that interlocks all of those zones simultaneously has not been predicted to occur.

Chart 1. Overview of The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake

Date	11 March 2011, at 14:46
Hypocenter and the scale (estimate)	Sanriku offshore (latitude 38.6 north, longitude 142.52 east, around 130km east-southeast of Ojika Peninsula) 24km deep Magnitude of 9.0
Source region	approx. 450km long approx. 200km width

Figure 2. Causes of Death in the Great East Japan Earthquake (Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima Prefecture)

Data provided by National Police Agency

### 1 -1-1-2. Overview of the damage

○ 15,270 deaths, 8,499 missing (more than 90% of deaths were caused by drowning and 65% of the dead were over 60)

○ Housing: approx. 100,000 demolished, 60,000 partially destroyed

Direct damage to the stock (social capital, housing and private corporate facilities): approx. 16-25 trillion yen

Inundation area caused by tsunami was 561 square kilometers throughout Japan. Much wider areas were inundated as compared to the prediction of Hazard Maps.
Figure 3. Comparison of the number of casualties and the area population by age

### 1 -1-1-3. Comparison with great disasters in the past

o Massive earthquake of magnitude

9.0, the maximum scale ever observed

in the country

Unprecedented

Disaster

Severe damage was caused by tsunami

and the devastated area is widespread

○ Greatest number of casualties,

since World War II

## 1 -1-2 Emergency response

### 1 -1-2-1. Initial response

○ Initial response and the establishment of the emergency headquarters

11 March, 14:50 Established the Response Office at Prime Minister's Office Convened the Emergency Response Team

15:14 Established the Extreme Disaster Management Headquarters (the first establishment after the enactment of the law)

15:37 1 $ ^{st} $ meeting of the Extreme Disaster Management Headquarters (adopted a basic policy on disaster response countermeasures)

18:42 Dispatched government inspection team (to Miyagi Prefecture)

19:23 3^{rd} meeting of the Extreme Disaster Management Headquarters (direction on relief measures for stranded commuters)

12 March 6:00 Established the Local Headquarters for Extreme Disaster Management (in Miyagi Prefecture)
Cooperation by United States Forces Japan

By 17 March, 12 meetings of the Extreme Disaster Management Headquarters had been held, and the following emergent measures were taken:

• (Since 11 March) Application of the Disaster Relief Act

• (12 March) Designation of an Extremely Severe Disaster

• (Since 12 March) Application of the Act on Support for Livelihood Recovery of Disaster Victims

• (13 March) Designation as a Specified Major Disaster

• (14 March) Decision of the liquidation of the reserve fund for relief supplies to the disaster-stricken area

etc.

## o Rescue Operation

• National Police Agency: Dispatched approx. 307,500 staff (as of 31 May)

• Fire and Disaster Management

Agency: Dispatched 1,558 Emergency

Fire Response Teams, 6,099 staff

(maximum, as at 18 March, 11:00), total of

27,373 teams, approx.103,600

firefighters joined (as of 31 May)

• Japan Coast Guard: Dispatched total of 4,413 boats, 1,564 airplanes, 1,510 staff of Special Rescue Teams (as of 30 May)

Emergency Fire Response Teams (Kesennuma City, Miyagi Prefecture)

Photo provided by Fire and Disaster Agency,

Taken by Tokyo Fire Department

Ministry of Defense: approx. 107,000 corps of Japan Self-Defense Force at maximum (the first call-up of Ready Reserve Self-Defense Officials)

• Total number of rescued people by Police, Fire Departments, Japan Coast Guard and Japan Self-Defense Force was 26,707 (as of 30 May)

○ Acceptance of international rescue teams

• Rescue teams and experts' teams from 28 countries, regions, and organizations

• "Operation Tomodachi (friendship)" by US Forces

⇒ Dispatched more than 16,000 corps, approx.15 ships, approx. 140 airplanes (maximum)

U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class

Matthew M. Bradley/Released
○ Fire extinction, emergency medical care, procurement and transporting of essential commodities of life

• Total of 313 cases of fire (in particular, 163 cases in Miyagi Prefecture)

• Emergency medical care, such as the dispatch of Disaster Medical Assistance Teams (DMAT, maximum 193 teams).

• Decide to liquidate approx. 30.2 billion yen from FY2010 reserve fund for the procurement and transporting of relief supplies, such as essential commodities of life (Cabinet decision on 14 March). The initial needs from the devastated area in the aftermath of the disaster were water, food, and blankets, but they gradually shifted into commodities.

• To supply gasoline smoothly, emergency measures were taken, such as requests to related industries, reducing the imposed oil stock level of private companies, controlling exports and demand, promoting coordination among oil companies, providing a great number of tankers, transporting by railways, and developing hub gasoline stations.

• Secured emergency roadways for lifesaving and transportation of emergency relief goods

### 1 -1-2-2. Response to infrastructure and lifeline damage

○ Transportation facilities

Great impact on railways, roadways, ports, and aviation traffic

→gradually recovered afterward

(ex.) Service restored on all Tohoku Shinkansen (bullet train) lines (29 April), Tohoku Expressway opened for regular vehicles (24 March), service restored in Sendai Airport for civil aviation (13 April)

o Lifelines

Damage to electricity, gas, water, sewage, telecommunications,

broadcasting, petroleum refining plants, etc. → gradually recovered afterward

(ex.) Initially 8.91 million houses were hit by blackouts in the area covered by the Tohoku Electric Power

Company→reduced to 300 houses (as of 27 May).

Initially gas supply for 480,000 houses was stopped → almost recovered (as of 3 May)

o Public buildings

• Damaged approx. 6,400 facilities of public schools

☐ Rivers and coastal facilities, agricultural facilities and fisheries facilities
### 1 -1-2-3. Measures to assist the lives of afflicted people

○ Establishment of the Special Headquarters for Measures to Assist the Lives of Disaster Victims (decided 17 March), renamed afterward as Team in Charge of Assisting the Lives of Disaster Victims (9 May)

○ Procurement and transporting of essential commodities of life (handed over from the Extreme Disaster Management Headquarters)

• procured supplies: food (approx. 26 million meals), drink (approx. 8 million bottles), blankets (approx. 410,000), fuel (approx. 16,000 kilo-liters), diapers

Food supply by Japan Self-Defense Force

Photo by Japan Self-Defense Force

(approx. 400,000), medicine (approx. 240,000 boxes), partitions (approx. 66,000), etc.

• Transportation : Japan Truck Association (total 1,900 trucks), airplanes of Japan Self-Defense Force (total 150), police and private helicopters (5), ships (8)

* Above numbers for the procurement of supplies and transportation are the total including those handled by the Extreme Disaster Management Headquarters

o Support and information provision for the evacuees

• Number of evacuees: approx. 470,000 (at maximum), decreased to currently approx. 100,000 (as of 30 May)

• Improvement of the living environment at evacuation shelters (conducted condition surveys regularly)

• Provision of information for supporting afflicted people (issued "wall newspapers" and distributed various handbooks)

☐ Dispatch of staff to local governments (dispatch of national officials and officials from other local governments)

○ Securing services of health, medical care, welfare, and education

• Dispatch of more than 12,000 medical workers such as medical doctors, dentists, nurses, and pharmacists.

• Acceptance of 9,433 afflicted children in other prefectures. Reduction and exemption of school expenses

○ Toward the reconstruction of lives

• Distributing monetary aid for reconstruction of afflicted peoples' lives, disaster consolatory aid, etc.

• Employment and job support (“Japan as One” initiative for employment support) (support for small and medium-sized enterprises and agriculture and fishing industries and support for the employment of afflicted people)
### 1 -1-2-4. Disaster waste disposal

○ Total estimated amount of disaster waste : approx. 24.9 million tons

→ Ministry of the Environment proposed guidelines on entering private land and removing destroyed houses

⇒ Increasing financial assistance by the national government for disaster waste disposal by local governments. Disaster countermeasures bonds cover all of the local governments' obligations, and tax allocation covers 100% of its redemption money for principal and interest

Countermeasures for submergence (such as effective drainage of submergence caused by land subsidence), countermeasures for liquefaction (such as flexible application of damage approval procedures)

○ Appropriate announcement of warning information

⇒ Upgrade sediment disaster warning levels for local governments that had observed earthquakes of scale 5 or greater in seismic intensity scales

### 1 -1-2-5. Promotion of housing stabilization

○ Construction of emergency temporary houses (23,795 houses have been completed; 36,956 houses are under construction, and an additional 2,076 houses are planned) (as of 30 May)

☐ Secondary evacuation to publicly-owned houses (free provision of publicly-owned houses, support by the establishment of an information center)

☐ Temporary evacuation to hotels and inns (supporting acceptance of evacuees to hotels and inns beyond prefecture borders)

### 1 -1-2-6. Cordial support for disaster-stricken area

○ Relief supplies from overseas (55 countries, regions and organizations)

## ☐ Donations:

Domestic : approx. 236.2 billion yen (collected by Japan Red Cross, Central Community Chest of Japan, etc.)

Preparation of meal by volunteers

Overseas : more than 16.1 billion yen (from 81 countries, regions and organizations)

Photo provided by ADRA Japan

o Volunteers

Volunteers have played important roles in the operation of evacuation shelters, helping preparation of meals, and cleaning up of the muddy houses

• Matching by Disaster Volunteer Centers

→accepted volunteer applicants and matched volunteers with changing needs

• Coalition of governments and volunteers

→coalition of public and private sectors: prefectural government, prefectural disaster volunteer
## 1 -1-3 Policy measures since the disaster

### 1 -1-3-1. Designation of a disaster of extreme severity

The disaster was designated as a Disaster of Extreme Severity (nationwide) on the very next day following the disaster; there was no waiting for the compilation of damage data from the disaster-stricken area, because the damage was considered as obviously exceeding the designation criteria.

### 1 -1-3-2. Designation of specified major disaster

Measures were taken to protect the rights and benefits of the afflicted people by extending the expiration dates of the rights and benefits provided by government.

### 1 -1-3-3. Flexible application of the Disaster Relief Act

All prefectures were informed of the flexible application of the Disaster Relief Act so that not only the prefectures in the disaster-afflicted area but also those outside the afflicted area can actively provide disaster relief to afflicted people.

### 1 -1-3-4. Tax measures

As emergency measures, special arrangements were made on national and local taxes, in consideration of the Great East Japan Earthquake’s unprecedented scale of disaster.

### 1 -1-3-5. First supplementary budget

4.0153 trillion yen supplementary budget came into effect on 2 May, as estimated necessary expenses within the fiscal year for the immediate recovery from the Great East Japan Earthquake.

### 1 -1-3-6. Special financial support by the Special Financial Support Act for the Great East Japan Earthquake

Special assistant measures were provided such as the financial support to local governments that promote rapid relief and recovery, reduction and exemption of social insurance premiums for afflicted people, and financial assistance to small and medium-sized enterprises.

### 1 -1-3-7. Special measures for building and construction

Considering the situation of the disaster-stricken areas by the Great East Japan Earthquake, such measures as proxy execution of disaster recovery public works by the national government and building restrictions in urban areas were taken.
### 1 -1-3-8. Improvement of the procedures for providing monetary aid under the Act on Support for Livelihood Recovery of Disaster Victims

Measures were taken to quicken the procedures for providing aid money based on the Act on Support for Livelihood Recovery of Disaster Victims. Money is provided to household who suffered severe damage to the basis of their lives, such as the total destruction of houses.

## 1 -1-4 The next steps

Present major concerns are the normalization of afflicted people’s lives by improving their living conditions, the recovery of infrastructure and other facilities, and the reconstruction of disaster-stricken areas. Simultaneously, verification of the disaster and the development of future disaster risk reduction measures are also necessary.

### 1 -1-4-1. Measures for the normalization of lives in disaster-stricken areas

Measures for upcoming three months, until the full reconstruction starts, were described in the policy document decided on 20 May. These measures include:

1. Improvement of living conditions at evacuation shelters

2. Housing support by promoting the construction of emergency temporary housing

3. Securing services such as health, medical care, welfare and education

4. Removal of debris aiming at completion by around the end of August

5. Emergency disaster prevention measures, such as secondary disasters countermeasures before the rainy season and the typhoon season

6. Recovery of lifelines, transportation networks, farms, and fishery ports

7. Securing employment

### 1 -1-4-2. Toward reconstruction of disaster-stricken areas

The Reconstruction Design Council was established on 11 April, to discuss various ideas about reconstruction as a basis for the development of a policy outline for reconstruction. “Seven principles of the reconstruction design” was formulated and published on 10 May.

### 1 -1-4-3. Toward future disaster management and disaster risk reduction

Disaster management and disaster risk reduction grow in sophistication on the ceaseless effort of verifying disaster situations and responses that arise after experiencing an actual disaster, drawing lessons learned from that experience and revising policies as necessary. At present, it is clear that supporting the afflicted people and the reconstruction of the disaster-stricken area are the most important