McDougall, C., Cohen, M., Swaray, R., & Perry A. (2006) Cost-benefit analysis of sentencing. (キャンベル共同計画日本語版ホームページ(http://fuji.u-shizuoka-ken.ac.jp/~campbell/library.htm)から邦訳（津富(監訳）「量刑の費用便益分析」）

緑大輔(2009) 「比較法2アメリカ合衆国カリフォルニア州」（福井（編）『未決拘禁改革の課題と展望』，資料1 pp.295-312.），日本評論社

森本哲也(2005)『概説アメリカ連邦刑事手続』，信山社

Murphy, E. (2008) Paradigms of restraint. Duke Law Journal, 57, 1321–1411.

National Conference of State Legislatures (2008) State Statutes Related to Jessica’s Law.

National Conference of State Legislatures.

National Institute of Justice (2011) Electronic monitoring reduces recidivism. In Short Toward Criminal Justice Solutions NCJ 234460 U.S. Department of Justice.

National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center (1999) Keeping track of electronic monitoring. NLECTC Bulletin, October 1999. NLECT.

Nellis, M. (2011) The Integration of Probation and Electronic Monitoring: A Continuing Challenge. (a report presented at the CEP 7th conference on Electronic Monitoring.) (http://www.cepprobation.org/uploaded_files/EM%20Literature%20Research.pdf)

ニューメディア開発協会(2007) 『センサーネットワークを活用した情報システムの応用に関する調査・開発報告書』, ニューメディア開発協会

Nieto, M. & Jung D. (2006) The Impact of Residency Restrictions on Sex Offenders and Correctional Management. (CRB 066-008). California Research Bureau.

NLECTC(2002) Making electronic supervision work. TechBeat, Fall 2002. NLECTC.

NLECTC (2005) Technology primer: Radio Frequency identification. TechBeat, Summer 2005. NLECTC.

Office of Probation and Pretrial Services (OPPS) (n.d.) Location Monitoring Program in the Federal Courts (MS PowerPoint Presentation). OPPS.

Office of Probation and Pretrial Services (2010a) Guide to Judiciary Policy: Vol 8 Probation and Pretrial Services; Part F. Federal Location Monitoring Program (Monograph 113). OPPS.

Office of Probation and Pretrial Services (2010b) Interagency Agreement 817–11 Between the Administrative Office of the United States Courts and United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons.

Office of Probation and Pretrial Services (2010c) Post-conviction Supervision Cases Closed by Supervision Category for LMP.

Office of Program Policy Analysis & Government Accountability (OPPAGA) (2005) Electronic monitoring should be better targeted to the most dangerous offenders. OPPAGA Report No. 05-19. OPPAGA.

OPPAGA(2006) Florida’s state, county, local authorities are implementing Jessica Lunsford Act. OPPAGA Report No. 06-03. OPPAGA.

OPPAGA (2007a) Redirection pilots meet and exceed residential commitment outcomes; $5.8 million saved. OPPAGA Report No. 07-10 OPPAGA.

OPPAGA (2007b) Electronic monitoring expanded to target communities’ more dangerous offenders. OPPAGA Report No. 07-42. OPPAGA.

OPPAGA(2008a) Pretrial release programs vary across the state; New reporting requirements pose challenges. OPPAGA Report No. 08-75. OPPAGA.

OPPAGA(2008b) The Delays in Screening Sexually Violent Predators Increase Costs; Treatment Facility Security Enhanced. OPPAGA Report No. 08-10. OPPAGA.

OPPAGA(2010a) Pretrial release program’s compliance with new reporting requirements is mixed. OPPAGA Report No. 10-08. OPPAGA.

OPPAGA (2010b) Intermediate sanctions for non-violent offenders could produce savings.