Silviase/jgov_v1.4_full_ann huggingface dataset:
### 1. Forestry

#### 1.1. Value of forestry production

In 2009, the value of gross forestry production was 412.2 billion yen, or 36% of its record high in 1980. Among the gross production value, wood production accounts for 45%, while mushroom production for 53% (Fig.4-1).

Fig.4-1: Value of gross forestry production

#### 1.2. Forestry management

In 2008, the average income of forest owners from forestry activities was as low as one hundred thousand yen, or 190 thousand yen decline from the previous year. This decline is attributed to the decline of income from log sales. Among the household forestry management organizations, only 1.7% of them depend on forestry as their major household income category.

In Japan, most of forests are owned by large numbers of small scale forest owners. Further, the costs for growing forests are very high. Forest owners tend to be reluctant in forestry practice including logging and planting, due to its low profitability.

#### 1.3. Forestry contractors

In Japan, forestry contractors consist of three categories: forest owners themselves, the Forest Owners' Cooperatives, and private forestry contractors. Among those categories, the Forest Owners' Cooperatives are major forestry contractors, conducting more than a half of forestry practices including planting, weeding, and thinning in Japan (Fig.4-2). In October 2010, the National Federation of Forest Owners' Cooperative Associations adopted its policy to put the “proposal-based coordination and consolidation of forestry practices” as their priority activity.

Fig.4-2: Share of contracted forest operation areas by categories of contractors
In Japan, the scale of private forestry contractors is relatively small. According to the Census of Agriculture and Forestry in 2010, 83% of private forestry contractors produce only less than 5,000 m $ ^{3} $ per year (Fig.4-3).

In some regions, both forestry contractors and civil engineering companies cooperatively conduct forestry practices and construct forest

Fig.4-3: Number of forest management organizations by annual production volume and volume of roundwood production

road network. Such movements could contribute to the assurance of forestry workers and revitalization of economy in rural mountain communities.

#### 1.4. Forestry workforce

The number of forestry workforce has been declining, reaching 47,000 in 2005. Although the share of aged workforce (aged 65 or older) is as high as 26%, the ratio of young workforce (aged 35 or younger) is on the rise.

The Forestry Agency is conducting the “Green Employment” project, which educates introductory skills and knowledge of forestry to the new entrants to forestry. Thanks to the project, the number of new entrants into forestry was 3.964 in 2009, or 18% increase from the previous year (Fig.4-4).

The Forestry Agency also revised the “Fundamental Policy for Ensuring Forestry Workforce” in 2010, which promotes career development of forestry workforce.

Fig.4-4: Number of new entrants to forestry workforce
### 2. Forestry Revitalization Projects

#### 2.1. Effective and stable forestry management

For the improvement of productivity in forestry, “coordination and consolidation of forestry practices” is very important. Such activities will coordinate a number of small forest owners and conduct forestry practices in a large scale.

In particular, the Forestry Agency promotes the “proposal-based coordination and consolidation of forestry practices” in which private forestry contractors propose consolidated forestry practices to multiple forest owners.

In 2011, the Forestry Agency introduced the “forest management and environmental conservation direct payment system,” in order to directly support forest owners and contractors who will conduct consolidated forest management in large scale. The system also supports forestry practices including thinning for wood use and development of forest road network (Fig.4-5).

Further, the Forestry Agency established the standards of the “wood transportation road” for truck and the “log salvage road” for forestry machines, for the acceleration of the development of “durable and simple forest road network.”

Fig.4-5: “Forest management and environmental conservation direct support system”

#### 2.2. Human resource development

In 2010, the Forestry Agency developed the fundamental policy of human resource development, the "Human Resource Development Master Plan," for the development of human resources with special knowledge and skills necessary for the promotion of coordination and consolidation of forestry practices.

Since 2007, the Forestry Agency has been implementing the training course for the “forestry practice planners,” who will draft the “forestry practice proposal” and develop consensus among many forest owners.

In 2011, the Agency initiated a training course for the development of “Foresters” who will plan and advise local forestry activities. The certification program of “Foresters” will start from 2013.
### 3. Rural Mountain Communities

#### 3.1. Current situation

The rural mountain communities cover 50% of total land area, or 60% of total forest area, in Japan. However, living infrastructure is underdeveloped and population continues to decline and become older in those areas (Fig.4-6). In such areas, public benefits of forests might be adversely affected due to the lack of proper forest management.

Those areas need to be maintained through forestry production activities for the fulfillment of multi-functional roles of forests.

Fig.4-6: Population of mountainous areas and ratio of elderly people

#### 3.2. Revitalization of Rural Mountain Communities

In order to maintain the community function of rural mountain communities, promotion of settlements from urban areas, improvement of community infrastructures, and creation of job opportunities are important.. To this end, the Forestry Agency promotes communication between rural mountain communities and urban areas, and supports settlement initiatives through the creation of job opportunities in new businesses utilizing forest resources.

In April 2009, the “Support Center for Revitalization of Mountainous Areas” was established, with the objective to enhance the communication between mountainous communities and urban business enterprises, through matching needs of both sides. Such communications are expected to become popular through CSR activities by private companies, based upon the accomplishments of the Center.

## Case study: Matching between urban business enterprises and mountainous communities by the “Support Center for Revitalization of Mountainous Areas”

The major copy machine maker “C” conducted the “offset” of the $ CO_{2} $ emission from their production activities with the credit produced from forest management activities, as a part of its corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities.

Figure: Carbon offset through intermediation of the Support Center for Revitalization of Mountainous Areas
### 1. Wood Demand and Supply

#### 1.1. World wood demand and supply

The total volume of industrial roundwood consumption in the world is on the rise in the long term. However, in 2009, the volume of industrial roundwood consumption declined to 1.4 billion $ m^{3} $ , or 8% drop from the previous year, due to the global financial crisis beginning in autumn 2008.

As for the world wood trade, China increased imports of industrial roundwood and exports of plywood, while Russia decreased exports of industrial roundwood. These two countries have strong influence on the flow of world wood trade (Fig.5-1,2).

Industrial Roundwood

Plywood and other panels

Fig.5-1: World imports of wood products in 1999 and 2009

Plywood and other panels

Fig.5-2: World exports of wood products in 1999 and 2009
#### 1.2. Wood demand and supply in Japan

In 2009, Japan’s wood demand decreased by 19% from the previous year, reaching 63.21 million m $ ^{3} $ , due to the downturn of economic activity beginning in autumn 2008.

Among the wood supply, the volume of domestic wood decreased by 6%, reaching 17.59 million m $ ^{3} $ , while that of imported wood decreased by 23%, reaching 45.62 million m $ ^{3} $ . As a result, the self-sufficiency rate of wood reached as high as 27.8% for 2009 (Fig.5-3).

Fig.5-3: Wood supply and wood sufficiency rates in Japan

As for imported wood, the volume of wood imports decreased for all categories in 2009, compared with ten years before. In particular, imports of roundwood from Russia, lumber from Canada, and plywood from Indonesia substantially decreased (Fig.5-4).

Fig.5-4: Japan’s imports of wood products in 1999 and 2009
#### 1.3. Wood prices

In 2010, wood prices for all categories significantly increased from the previous year, when those prices sharply dropped by the worldwide economic crisis.

#### 1.4. Wood from responsible forest management

As a measure to promote the use of wood produced from responsible forest management, use of legally produced wood and forest certifications are becoming popular in Japan. However, the ratio of forest certified by certification schemes is still very low in Japan, compared with other developed countries.

#### 1.5. Non-wood forest products

Non-wood forest products include mushrooms, wild vegetables, edible nuts, and charcoals. These products are very important for local economy. In 2009, the value of non-wood forest products production was 28.91 billion yen, 90% of which account for mushrooms. Recently, imports of fresh shiitake mushrooms from China decreased, while its domestic production is on the rise.

### 2. Wood Products Industry

#### 2.1. Wood products industry

In 2009, the number of new housing starts significantly increased to 810 thousand units from the previous year. The share of wooden structure in new housing starts was 57%.

As for lumber production, large scale mills are becoming dominant. Such mills, which account for only 7% of total number of mills, consume 58% of total material inputs. In addition, the share of domestic wood in total material inputs is also on the rise.

As for plywood production, the share of domestic wood in material input of domestic plywood mills is on the rise, reaching 64% in 2009 (Fig.5-5).

Fig.5-5: Material inputs for plywood production and share of domestic roundwood

#### 2.2. Use of domestic wood

In response to the improvement of domestic log processing technologies and uncertain situation of wood imports, sawmills and plywood mills are converting their material inputs from imported wood to domestic wood. The situation surrounding domestic wood is drastically changing.

The “New Wood Production Projects” intends to promote stable supply of wood products to major housing companies or local home builders with lower costs. Under this project, the use of domestic wood in the model areas increased from 1.32 million $ m^{3} $ in 2005 to 1.64 million $ m^{3} $ in 2009.
### 1. Roles of National Forests

National Forests cover 30% of total forest area in Japan (Fig.6-1). National Forests have vital roles in providing safety and security with local people, through such multiple functions of forest as prevention of land erosion, alleviation of flood, or mitigation of global warming.

### 2. Management as “Forests for People”

The National Forest Management is managing and conserving the National Forests under the fundamental principle of “Forests for People,” in order to satisfy various expectations from people in the society.

Each National Forest is categorized into one of three functional types by its expected functions.

The National Forest Management conducts forest management in National Forests for the fulfillment of multi-functional roles of forest,

Fig 6-1: Location of National Forests

including long-term wood production management, multiple storied forest management, or broadleaf forest management.

Almost 90% of National Forests are designated as “conservation forests” under the Forest Law, for the provision of public benefits including land conservation and water resource conservation. In the “conservation forests,” general forest management is allowed with specific limitations for each type of conservation forests. The National Forest Management also conducts “forest conservation works,” such as restoration of devastated forests.

The National Forest Management promotes forest management in cooperation with the private sector. Recently, the National Forest Management is promoting the forest management system with road system and forestry machines, and the establishment of “cooperative forest management area” through cooperation with private forests.

The National Forest Management also provides National Forests to various organizations as their activity fields, such as “forests for students,” “forest for voluntary groups,” or “forests for corporations.” Further, the National Forest Management also nurtures local forest resources used for local cultural ceremonies or local historical wooden buildings, respecting local culture and history.

The National Forest Management is promoting thinning of National Forests to meet the removal target under the Kyoto Protocol. In 2009, the National Forest Management

Fig 6-2: Thinned areas in National Forests
conducted 140 thousand hectares of thinning in National Forests (Fig.6-2). The National Forest Management is also promoting wood use in forest civil engineering works.

National Forests have vital roles in the conservation of biodiversity as a network of ecosystems. The National Forest Management designates National Forests with diverse forest ecosystems as “protected forests,” or “green corridor” which connects several “protected forests.”

National Forests play an important role in stable supply of domestic wood, providing approximately 20% of total domestic wood supply. The National Forest Management is promoting stable wood supply through the agreement with major wood processing companies, such as large-scale lumber mills or plywood factories. Such stable wood supply from National Forests would enable those companies to rationalize their processing lines or reduce production costs.

### 3. Reform of the National Forest Management

The National Forest Management has been making efforts to restore fiscal stability by ensuring income from sales of wood and other properties, and implementing effective forest management through private consignment. As a result, the National Forest Management has been succeeding in keeping financial balance without external borrowing since FY 2004.

The “Forest and Forestry Revitalization Plan” in December 2009 declared to study the reform of the National Forest Management from the Special Account system to the General Account of the Government. Further, the “budget screening” by the Government Revitalization Unit concluded that the Special Account of the National Forest Management to be abolished and incorporated into the General Account. In response to these assessments, the National Forest Management is conducting study on possible revision of the Special Account system of the National Forest Management.
7. Thinned Area and Use of Thinned Wood

Thinned area (1,000ha)	Used volume of thinned wood (million m³)
Total	Private and public forest	National forest	Total	Private and public forest	National forest
2007	521	395	126	5.37	3.44	2.14	0.47	0.83	1.93
2008	548	434	114	5.66	3.68	2.26	0.39	1.03	1.98
2009	586	446	140	6.37	4.23	2.57	0.48	1.18	2.14

Source: Forestry Agency

Note: Used volume is in log equivalent.

1990	1995	2000	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006
Private and public forest	Thinned area (1,000ha)	277	215	304	314	312	277	281	282
Used volume of thinned wood (million m³)	Total	2.34	1.83	2.74	2.79	2.83	2.84	2.84	3.24
Saw mwood	1.70	1.25	1.95	1.90	1.85	1.84	1.81	1.96
Roundwood	0.37	0.34	0.41	0.44	0.50	0.45	0.41	0.48
Others	0.26	0.24	0.38	0.45	0.48	0.55	0.62	0.80

Source: Forestry Agency

Note: Used volume is in log equivalent.

8. Forest Area by Owners

2010
ha	%
Total	17,627,335	100.0
Private	13,590,186	77.1
Public	3,389,618	19.2
Prefecture	1,242,080	7.0
Public corporation	436,296	2.5
Municipality	1,404,452	8.0
Property ward	306,790	1.7
Japan Green Resources Agency	647,531	3.7

Source: MAFF"2010 Census of Agriculture and Forestry"

Note 1: Figures for the total may not agree with the sum of the each item

due to the rounding-off in calculation.

2: Japan Green Resources Agency broke up on Apr. 1, 2008,

and Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute took over its ownership.

9. Number of Forest Owners and their Forest Area

Total	0ha	-3ha	3-5ha	5-20ha	20-50ha	50-100ha	100ha-
Number	Area (ha)	Number	Area (ha)	Number	Area (ha)	Number	Area (ha)	Number	Area (ha)	Number	Area (ha)	Number	Area (ha)	Number	Area (ha)
Total	139,997	5,173,928	1,302	-	1,340	1,649	40,973	149,088	69,170	638,308	17,854	508,963	4,883	320,201	4,475	3,555,720
Corporation	6,957	1,523,136	788	-	138	173	604	2,285	1,901	20,288	1,244	39,458	829	57,606	1,453	1,403,326
Private Company	2,473	826,377	505	-	76	94	188	691	611	6,269	372	11,282	199	13,295	522	794,747
Cooperative	3,151	503,279	245	-	57	71	182	701	773	8,870	666	21,635	498	34,987	730	437,014
Agricultural cooperative	94	24,221	-	-	-	-	4	15	16	202	22	741	10	754	42	22,509
Forestry cooperative	2,280	297,430	225	-	54	68	82	317	464	5,541	476	15,620	404	28,404	575	247,479
Other cooperatives	777	181,628	20	-	3	4	96	369	293	3,127	168	5,273	84	5,829	113	167,026
Other corporations	1,333	193,480	38	-	5	8	234	893	517	5,149	206	6,542	132	9,324	201	171,565
Non-corporation	131,371	2,040,618	512	-	1,201	1,473	40,315	146,594	67,039	615,372	16,385	462,176	3,831	246,619	2,088	568,383
Individual	125,242	1,770,923	352	-	1,165	1,426	39,016	141,710	64,301	588,487	15,360	430,675	3,407	217,530	1,641	391,095
Public	1,669	1,610,174	2	-	1	2	54	208	230	2,648	225	7,329	223	15,976	934	1,584,011

Source: MAFF"2010 Census of Agriculture and Forestry"
Full text (in Japanese) of the “Annual Report on Forest and Forestry for FY2010” is available on the website of the Forestry Agency:

http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/j/kikaku/hakusyo/22hakusho/zenbun.html

Please refer to those texts for further information on the issues contained in this brochure, or ask the Annual Report Group of the Forestry Agency:

Annual Report Group

Policy Planning Division, Forestry Agency

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries (MAFF)

1-2-1 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, TOKYO 100-8952

JAPAN

e-mail: mori_hakusho@nm.maff.go.jp
平 成 24 年 度 一 般 会 計 歲 入 歲 出 決 算

(第 185 回 国 会 提 出)
## 目次

平成24年度一般会計歳入歳出決算 ..... 1
平成24年度一般会計歳入歳出決算説明 ..... 1
歳入歳出決算及び各事項の計算 ..... 47
歳入 ..... 47
国 会 主 管 ..... 47
裁 判 所 主 管 ..... 47
会 計 検 査 院 主 管 ..... 48
内 閣 主 管 ..... 48
内 閣 府 主 管 ..... 48
復 興 庁 主 管 ..... 49
総 務 省 主 管 ..... 49
法 務 省 主 管 ..... 50
外 務 省 主 管 ..... 50
財 務 省 主 管 ..... 51
文 部 科 学 省 主 管 ..... 53
厚 生 労 働 省 主 管 ..... 54
農 林 水 産 省 主 管 ..... 55
经 济 座 業 省 主 管 …… 56
国 土 交 通 省 主 管 …… 56
環 境 省 主 管 …… 57
防 衛 省 主 管 …… 58

出 …… 60
皇 室 費 …… 60
国 会 所 管 …… 60
裁 判 所 所 管 …… 61
会 計 檢 查 院 所 管 …… 61
内 閣 所 管 …… 61
内 閣 府 所 管 …… 62
復 興 庁 所 管 …… 66
総 務 省 所 管 …… 66
法 務 省 所 管 …… 69
外 務 省 所 管 …… 70
財 務 省 所 管 …… 71
文 部 科 学 省 所 管 …… 73
厚 生 労 働 省 所 管 …… 79
農 林 水 産 省 所 管 …… 86
經 济 座 業 省 所 管 …… 95
国 土 交 通 省 所 管 …… 99
環 境 省 所 管 …… 110
防 衛 省 所 管 …… 112
( 1 )

## 平 成 24 年 度 一 般 会 計 歲 入 歲 出 決 算

平成24年度における

歳入決算総額は

107,762,032,718,963円

歳出決算総額は

97,087,176,621,536 円

である。

したがって

歳入歳出の決算上の剩余金は10,674,856,097,427円

である。

上記の歳入の主管別及び部款項別の金額並びに歳出の所管別、組織別及び項別の金額は「歳入歳出決算及び各事項の計算」の収納済歳入額欄及び支出済歳出額欄に掲げ、歳入歳出決算に係る各事項の計算はその各欄に掲げた。

## 平成24年度一般会計歳入歳出決算説明

## 第 1 歲 入

収納済歳入額は

107,762,032,718,963 円

であり、これを

歲入予算額

100,536,648,944,000 円

当初予算额

90,333,931,511,000 円

予算補正追加額

10,652,956,630,000 円

予算補正修正減少額

450,239,197,000 円

に比べると

増加した。

7,225,383,774,963 円
収納済歳入額を主管別に区分し、その歳入予算額との比較を示せば、下表のとおりであ る。
主 管	歳 入 予 算 額 (円)	収 納 済 歳 入 額 (円)	歳入予算額と収納済歳入額との差(△は減) (円)	主 管	歳 入 予 算 額 (円)	収 納 済 歳 入 額 (円)	歳入予算額と収納済歳入額との差(△は減) (円)
国 会	1,526,939,000	1,599,951,237	73,012,237	財 務 省	99,311,761,109,000	106,235,892,908,004	6,924,131,799,004
裁 判 所	25,197,663,000	40,902,673,922	15,705,010,922	文 部 科 学 省	28,165,996,000	34,490,624,368	6,324,628,368
会 計 検 查 院	23,321,000	23,273,677	△ 47,323	厚 生 劳 働 省	349,835,444,000	471,730,619,395	121,895,175,395
内 閣	977,300,000	16,536,486,907	15,559,186,907	農 林 水 座 省	414,021,546,000	441,679,644,450	27,658,098,450
内 閣 府	25,852,597,000	18,098,673,079	△ 7,753,923,921	経 済 座 業 省	28,710,861,000	35,295,889,233	6,585,028,233
復 興 庁	0	0	0	国 土 交 通 省	66,963,847,000	87,129,048,069	20,165,201,069
総 務 省	105,611,483,000	134,757,304,614	29,145,821,614	環 境 省	3,432,451,000	5,581,099,661	2,148,648,661
法 務 省	109,444,945,000	98,691,348,142	△ 10,753,596,858	防 衛 省	46,175,122,000	112,784,503,502	66,609,381,502
外 務 省	18,948,320,000	26,838,670,703	7,890,350,703	合 計	100,536,648,944,000	107,762,032,718,963	7,225,383,774,963
また、収納済歳入額を性質(部)別に区分し、その歳入予算額との比較及びその主な増減理由を示せば、下表のとおりである。
性 質 (部)	歳 入 予 算 額 (円)	収 納 済 歳 入 額 (円)	歳入予算額と収納済歳入額との差(△は減) (円)	主 な 増 減 理 由
租 税 及 印 紙 収 入	42,607,000,000,000	43,931,406,851,536	1,324,406,851,536	租 税 法人税において課税額が予定より多かったこと、源泉所得税において配当所得に対する課税額が予定より多かったこと、申告所得税において土地の讓渡所得に対する課税額が予定より多かったこと等により増収(増収額1,313,070,216,020円)があったが、自動車重量税及び関税において課税額が予定より少なくかったこと等により減収(減収額34,339,049,450円)があったので、差引き租税において増収(増収額1,278,731,166,570円)となったため
官業益金及官業収入	16,683,036,000	16,273,288,932	△ 409,747,068	官業収入 防衛省病院収入において患者数が予定より多かったこと等により増収(増収額171,192,220円)があったが、国立障害者リハビリテーションセンター病院収入において患者数が予定より少なくかったこと等により減収(減収額580,939,288円)があったので、差引き官業収入において減収(減収額409,747,068円)となったため
( 3 )

性質(部)	歳入予算額(円)	収納済歳入額(円)	歳入予算額と収納済歳入額との差(△は減)(円)	主な増減理由
政府資産整理収入	197,551,541,000	226,949,749,382	29,398,208,382	国有財産処分収入 土地売払代において土地の売払面積が予定より多かったこと等により増収(増収額15,169,453,254円)があったが、航空機売払代において回転翼航空機の売払いがなかったこと等により減収(減収額547,798,004円)があったので、差引き国有財産処分収入において増収(増収額14,621,655,250円)となったため
雑収入	3,679,242,369,000	4,274,118,512,442	594,876,143,442	国有財産利用収入 建物及物件貸付料において建物の貸付料が予定より多かったこと、物納証劵等配当金収入において物納証劵の配当金があったこと等により増収(増収額468,944,627円)があったが、土地及水面貸付料において土地の貸付面積が予定より少なくこと等により減収(減収額2,571,965,476円)があったので、差引き国有財産利用収入において減収(減収額2,103,020,849円)となったため
公債金	52,049,166,113,000	50,049,165,832,165	△ 2,000,000,280,835	特例公債の発行が予定より少なくこと等のため
( 4 )

性質(部)	歳入予算額(円)	収納済歳入額(円)	歳入予算額と収納済歳入額との差(△は減)(円)	主な増減理由
前年度剩余金受入	1,987,005,885,000	9,264,118,484,506	7,277,112,599,506	歳入予算額は、平成23年度新規発生剩余金のうち、同年度における地方交付税に相当する金額の交付税及び議与税配付金特別会計への未繰入額に相当する額と財政法(昭和22年法律第34号)第6条の純剰余金における歳出予算補正の財源に充てるための受入額と特別会計に関する法律の一部を改正する法律(平成24年法律第15号)附則第7条の規定により計算した額に相当する額の剩余金の受入額との合算額に相当する額であるのに対し、収納済歳入額は、平成23年度の財政法第41条の剩余金であるため
合計	100,536,648,944,000	107,762,032,718,963	7,225,383,774,963
(5)

## 第 2 歲 出

## ( 1 ) 総 説

支出済歳出額は

97,087,176,621,536 円

であり、これを

歲出予算現額

107,593,514,953,293 円

歲出予算額

100,536,648,944,000 円

当初予算額

90,333,931,511,000 円

予算補正追加額

12,267,729,870,000 円

予算補正修正減少額

2,065,012,437,000 円

前年度繰越額

7,056,866,009,293円

に比べると

10,506,338,331,757 円

の差額を生ずる。

上記差額のうち、翌年度へ繰り越した額は

7,611,176,794,575 円

であって、不用となった額は

2,895,161,537,182 円

である。

なお、予算総則の定めるところにより、所管又は組織の間において予算の移替えをした

ものは、総額

2,466,089,670,029 円

であって、その内訳を示せば、下表のとおりである。
( 6 )

区 分	所 管	移 替 额	備 考	区 分	所 管	移 替 额	備 考
增 (円)	减 (円)	增 (円)	减 (円)
(平成23年度予算総則第12条の規定による移替経費)	産業保安監督官署共通費、産業保安費	経 済 産 業 省	1,391,418,000	1,391,418,000	增は(組織)産業保安監督官署から(組織)原子力安全・保安院へ移替え、減は(組織)産業保安監督官署から(組織)原子力安全・保安院へ移替え
産業保安費、東日本大震災復旧・復興産業保安費	経 済 産 業 省	211,658,000	211,658,000	增は(組織)原子力安全・保安院から(組織)経済産業本省へ移替え、減は(組織)原子力安全・保安院から(組織)経済産業本省へ移替え	原子力安全庁共通費	経 済 産 業 省	0	6,433,000	環境省所管へ移替え
環境省	6,433,000	0	経済産業省所管から移替え
(平成23年度予算総則第13条の規定による移替経費)	経済産業本省共通費、産業保安監督官署共通費、産業保安費、環境本省共通費、原子力安全庁共通費	経 済 産 業 省	4,810,311,000	4,931,502,000	增は(組織)原子力安全・保安院から(組織)経済産業本省及び(組織)産業保安監督官署へ移替え、減は(組織)原子力安全・保安院から(組織)経済産業本省及び(組織)産業保安監督官署へ、環境省所管へ移替え
東日本大震災復旧・復興推進費	復興庁	0	1,310,167,041,000	文部科学省所管ほか4所管へ移替え
文部科学省厚生労働省農林水産省国土交通省環境省	5,436,239,000294,438,000182,291,290,0001,121,047,295,0001,097,779,000	000