Silviase/jgov_v1.4_full_ann huggingface dataset:
is essential for the international community, including both developed and developing countries, to work together to enhance measures on this issue. In September 2009, Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama announced at the United Nations (UN) Summit on Climate Change that Japan would aim to reduce its emissions by 25% by 2020, if compared to the 1990 level, premised on the establishment of a fair and effective international framework by all major economies and agreement on their ambitious targets.

At the 15th session of the Conference of Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP15) held in December 2009 in Copenhagen, Denmark, the Copenhagen Accord was formulated as a result of the discussions and negotiations which took place at the summit level and the COP agreed to take heed of the accord. Japan announced that it would provide assistance to developing countries which are taking active emissions reduction and other climate change measures or those which are vulnerable to the negative impacts of climate change, on the scale

## I ndonesia: Second Climate Change Program Loan

If deforestation, destruction of peatlands, and other factors are included, Indonesia is the world's fourth largest emitter of greenhouse gases after China, the U.S., and Brazil (Note 24). Indonesia is also likely to face greater climate change risks as global warming worsens. In this context, Japan provided ODA loans of approximately ¥37.4 billion (including approximately ¥9.4 billion in emergency financial assistance) to support the climate of ¥1,750 billion (about US$15 billion), including public and private financing, over about a three-year period until the end of 2012 (Note 22). This announcement gave a boost to the COP15 negotiations.

Furthermore, regarding the discussions of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (REDD+ $ ^{Note\ 23} $ ), taking into account the strides made at COP15, participants agreed in May 2010 to establish the REDD+ Partnership, with a view to strengthening partnership and coordination among the REDD+ actions of the international community. Japan, along with Papupa New Guinea, was selected to serve as co-chair of the Partnership until the end of 2010, and in October, hosted the Aichi-Nagoya Ministerial Meeting of the REDD+ Partnership. Japan has been actively supporting the efforts of REDD+. Japan has pledged US500 million in short-term assistance until 2012, and has already implemented approximately US200 million of this assistance (as of July 2010).

change efforts of the Government of Indonesia. This assistance is expected to: (1) contribute to mitigating global warming through the absorption and emissions reduction of greenhouse gases; (2) improve Indonesia's capacity to adapt to the negative impacts of climate change; and (3) promote responses to cross-cutting issues related to climate change.
## (4) Resources and Energy

In developing countries, there are approximately 1.5 billion people who have no access to electric power, which is equivalent to 22% of the world's population (Note 26). The lack of energy services leads to problems including a lack of industrial development, the loss of employment opportunities, poverty, and limited chances to receive

##

In order to secure sustainable development and energy for developing countries, Japan works for the stable supply of electric power in order to provide modern energy services and to nurture industry. Japan provides support for environmentally-friendly infrastructure development, such as boosting the efficiency of energy usage and power generation facilities that utilize renewable energy.

When it comes to resource abundant countries, Japan assists with the independent development of the country by obtaining foreign currency through resource development. Japan also works to establish medical services and education. It is expected that the world's energy demand will increase centering on newly emerging countries and developing countries in Asia and other regions in the future, and the steady supply of energy and appropriate consideration for the environment is essential.

and strengthen comprehensive and strategic relations by providing them with assistance including infrastructural supports centering on mines according to their needs. It is important to use ODA in addition to assistance from the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC), Nippon Export and Investment Insurance (NEXI), and Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation (JOGMEC), in order to secure the supplies of resources, energy, and metal resources through smooth resource development, production, and transport by private enterprises.

## ● Nepal: Project for Introduction of Clean Energy by Solar Electricity Generation System

Almost 100% of the electric power in Nepal is generated by hydroelectric power, but there is a substantial shortfall in hydroelectric power generation relative to the demand. Because of this, blackouts are carried out for 16 to 18 hours a day during the dry season. The introduction of diesel power generation has been considered in order to increase the amount of electric power supplied, but Nepal is dependent on imports for all of its petroleum fuel, and so an increase in the consumption of such fuels could potentially pose a major stumbling block to economic growth. In addition, it would also pose problems from the perspective of reducing emissions of carbon dioxide. For this reason, promoting the construction of new hydroelectric power stations and promoting the use of solar power and other renewable energies are important challenges. Japan is moving forward with introducing the first interconnected solar power generation system in Nepal through a grant aid worth ¥660 million. This is designed to disseminate and promote solar power generation systems in Nepal, build up a track record of operating such systems, foster technicians, and more.
2009 (calendar year)

(Net disbursements, US$ million)

Rank	Country or region	Grants	Loan aid	Total
Grant aid	Technical cooperation	Total	Amount disbursed	Amount recovered	Total
Grants provided through multilateral institutions
1	Armenia	1.30	1.64	2.94	98.53	2.76	95.76	98.70
2	Kazakhstan	0.57	4.94	5.51	57.87	26.25	31.62	37.13
3	Tajikistan	22.45	8.03	3.79	26.24	26.24
4	Uzbekistan	3.34	11.66	14.99	26.93	21.51	5.41	20.41
5	Kyrgyz Republic	5.54	10.14	15.68	2.39	0.32	2.07	17.75
6	Georgia	14.06	0.55	1.03	15.09	0.00	2.78	-2.78	12.31
7	Turkmenistan	1.15	1.15	2.34	-2.34	-1.19
8	Azerbaijan	7.82	0.58	8.40	0.04	10.48	-10.43	-2.03
Multiple countries in Central Asia and the Caucasus	3.24	3.24	3.24
Central Asia and the Caucasus region total	55.09	8.58	38.17	93.26	185.75	66.44	119.31	212.56

$ ^{*1} $ Region classifications are determined by MOFA.

$ ^{*2} $ Due to rounding, the total figure may not match the sum of each number.

$ ^{*3} $ Figures in parentheses do not include debt cancellation.

$ ^{*} $ 4 “Multiple countries” refers to assistance encompassing multiple countries such as dispatch of study teams and seminars.
2009 (calendar year)

(Net disbursements, US$ million)

Rank	Country or region	Grants	Total	Loan aid	Total
Grant aid	Technical cooperation	Amount disbursed	Amount recovered	Total
Grants provided through multilateral institutions
1	Tanzania	48.68	4.11	23.22	71.91	48.56	0.00	48.56	120.46
2	Sudan	125.09	81.87	13.57	138.65	27.63	-27.63	111.03
3	Ethiopia	80.79	34.34	16.98	97.76	97.76
4	Democratic Republic of the Congo	54.62	35.77	13.08	65.70	0.00	0.00	65.70
5	Ghana	44.93	0.45	19.87	64.80	64.80
6	Mozambique	50.19	8.26	10.49	60.67	0.00	0.00	60.67
7	Uganda	23.16	11.75	24.24	47.40	6.64	0.00	6.64	54.05
8	Burkina Faso	37.84	1.00	11.93	49.77	49.77
9	Senegal	25.32	17.58	42.91	3.83	0.00	3.83	46.74
10	Namibia	0.14	3.54	3.68	36.14	0.00	36.14	39.82
11	Sierra Leone	31.95	6.15	5.50	37.44	0.00	0.00	37.44
12	Zambia	16.21	3.11	20.43	36.64	0.00	0.00	0.00	36.64
13	Malawi	18.98	6.00	16.82	35.80	35.80
14	Mali	32.80	2.71	35.51	0.00	0.00	35.51
15	Niger	23.91	4.00	11.15	35.06	35.06
16	Togo	20.96	4.90	0.24	21.21	14.85	1.96	12.89	34.09
17	Kenya	59.53	24.85	24.81	84.34	22.31	72.99	-50.68	33.66
18	Nigeria	24.56	8.81	4.33	28.88	28.88
19	Djibouti	26.52	2.14	2.30	28.82	28.82
20	Benin	19.34	2.00	6.51	25.84	25.84
21	Somalia	22.60	22.60	0.04	22.64	0.00	0.00	22.64
22	Rwanda	12.70	9.17	8.64	21.34	21.34
23	Burundi	52.36	9.21	3.95	56.31	35.89	-35.89	20.42
24	Madagascar	7.39	1.00	11.90	19.29	0.00	0.26	-0.26	19.03
25	Guinea	16.35	2.02	1.85	18.20	0.00	0.00	18.20
26	Cape Verde	14.63	1.75	16.38	1.49	0.00	1.49	17.87
27	Liberia	11.06	6.90	3.66	14.71	0.00	0.00	14.71
28	Chad	13.85	13.85	0.13	13.98	13.98
29	Zimbabwe	11.24	10.68	1.14	12.38	0.00	0.00	12.38
30	Gambia	10.48	0.91	11.39	11.39
31	Côte d'Ivoire	9.38	3.00	1.01	10.39	0.00	0.00	10.39
32	Mauritania	6.70	3.00	2.92	9.63	9.63
33	Guinea-Bissau	8.69	4.21	0.74	9.43	9.43
34	Seychelles	7.79	1.28	9.06	9.06
35	Eritrea	7.22	1.50	1.56	8.78	8.78
36	Cameroon	4.30	0.53	3.81	8.11	0.00	0.00	0.00	8.11
37	Angola	3.37	1.00	3.39	6.76	6.76
38	Central African Republic	4.70	4.50	0.16	4.87	1.21	0.00	1.21	6.08
39	Comoros	5.11	0.20	5.30	5.30
40	South Africa Republic	0.43	5.24	5.68	1.01	-1.01	4.67
41	Lesotho	2.33	2.03	0.24	2.56	2.56
42	Swaziland	0.19	0.99	1.19	0.00	0.00	1.19
43	São Tomé and Príncipe	0.21	0.21	0.42	0.42
44	Republic of Congo	0.38	0.38	0.38
45	Equatorial Guinea	0.10	0.10	0.10
46	Gabon	0.13	4.85	4.97	4.89	-4.89	0.08
47	Mauritius	0.21	1.06	1.27	3.34	-3.34	-2.07
48	Botswana	0.22	1.99	2.22	4.83	-4.83	-2.61
Multiple countries in Africa	14.94	14.94	17.74	32.67	77.75	0.00	77.75	110.42
African region total	1,012.13	349.65	331.11	1,343.24	212.78	152.79	59.98	1,403.22

$ ^{*1} $ Region classifications are determined by MOFA.

$ ^{*2} $ Due to rounding, the total figure may not match the sum of each number.

$ ^{*} $ 3 Figures in parentheses do not include debt cancellation.

$ ^{*} $ 4 "Multiple countries" refers to assistance encompassing multiple countries such as dispatch of study teams and seminars.
2009 (calendar year)

(Net disbursements, US$ million)

Rank	Country or region	Grants	Loan aid	Total
Grant aid	Technical cooperation	Total	Amount disbursed	Amount recovered	Total
Grants provided through multilateral institutions
1	Turkey	1.80	8.29	10.10	388.24	187.59	200.65	210.75
2	Afghanistan	141.65	114.45	28.90	170.54	170.54
3	Morocco	4.77	8.12	12.88	125.79	40.75	85.05	97.93
4	[Palestinian Authority]	62.61	31.17	14.08	76.69	76.69
5	Yemen	33.92	5.98	5.06	38.98	1.77	-1.77	37.21
6	Iraq	3.11	0.05	8.22	11.33	16.79	0.00	16.79	28.12
7	Tunisia	0.19	5.97	6.15	76.41	68.15	8.26	14.41
8	Lebanon	0.54	0.21	0.75	10.24	7.54	2.71	3.46
9	Algeria	1.39	1.39	0.47	0.00	0.47	1.86
10	Oman	0.70	0.70	0.70
11	Libya	0.08	0.08	0.08
12	Iran	2.79	2.66	6.37	9.15	26.56	-26.56	-17.41
13	Egypt	23.55	22.75	46.30	107.42	172.53	-65.11	-18.81
14	Syria	10.28	4.16	12.23	22.50	76.96	-76.96	-54.45
15	Jordan	30.29	10.84	41.13	4.05	102.56	-98.51	-57.37
Multiple countries in Middle East	0.06	0.06	1.51	1.58	1.58
Middle East region total	315.92	158.59	139.73	455.65	729.42	684.40	45.02	500.67

$ ^{*1} $ Region classifications are determined by MOFA. Brackets indicate names of regions.

$ ^{*} $ 2 Including graduated countries in total.

$ ^{*3} $ Due to rounding, the total figure may not match the sum of each number.

$ ^{*} $ 4 Figures in parentheses do not include debt cancellation.

$ ^{*} $ 5 “Multiple countries” refers to assistance encompassing multiple countries such as dispatch of study teams and seminars.
2009 (calendar year)

(Net disbursements, US$ million)

Rank	Country or region	Grants	Total	Loan aid	Total
Grant aid	Technical cooperation	Amount disbursed	Amount recovered	Total
Grants provided through multilateral institutions
1	Costa Rica	0.81	6.53	7.33	61.64	10.68	50.96	58.29
2	Honduras	31.03	10.69	41.72	41.72
3	Paraguay	2.67	16.26	18.93	63.34	44.96	18.37	37.31
4	Panama	1.33	0.32	6.72	8.05	32.95	7.49	25.45	33.51
5	Bolivia	16.33	4.82	16.14	32.47	0.69	-0.69	31.78
6	Guatemala	1.19	10.01	11.20	23.01	8.24	14.77	25.97
7	Haiti	24.45	2.39	0.39	24.84	24.84
8	Nicaragua	7.10	5.35	10.29	17.39	17.39
9	Argentina	0.03	11.52	11.55	0.00	2.55	-2.56	9.00
10	Chile	1.00	9.12	10.12	0.00	2.22	-2.22	7.90
11	Saint Lucia	5.01	1.39	6.40	6.40
12	Guyana	3.99	0.23	0.65	4.64	4.64
13	Commonwealth of Dominica	3.31	1.15	4.46	4.46
14	Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	2.78	0.89	3.67	3.67
15	Cuba	0.85	2.77	3.63	3.63
16	Uruguay	0.81	3.69	4.50	2.07	-2.07	2.43
17	Venezuela	0.38	1.74	2.13	2.13
18	Belize	0.11	1.59	1.70	1.70
19	Antigua and Barbuda	0.00	0.97	0.97	0.97
20	Grenada	0.11	0.57	0.68	0.68
21	Suriname	0.21	0.05	0.26	0.26
22	Dominican Republic	0.26	10.64	10.89	10.66	-10.66	0.23
23	Trinidad and Tobago	0.08	0.00	0.08	0.08
24	Barbados	0.04	0.04	0.04
25	Saint Christopher and Nevis	0.03	0.03	0.03
26	El Salvador	4.07	10.21	14.28	2.89	20.99	-18.10	-3.82
27	Jamaica	0.15	3.58	3.74	10.32	19.31	-8.99	-5.25
28	Colombia	5.15	0.37	6.62	11.77	18.47	-18.47	-6.69
29	Ecuador	5.44	9.31	14.75	26.51	-26.51	-11.76
30	Mexico	2.04	13.66	15.70	8.23	54.64	-46.41	-30.71
31	Peru	1.47	0.33	10.87	12.34	123.27	172.39	-49.12	-36.77
32	Brazil	2.17	0.47	23.69	25.86	69.18	188.25	-119.07	-93.21
Multiple countries in Latin America and the Caribbean	0.05	0.05	11.71	11.75	11.75
Latin America and the Caribbean region total	124.37	14.33	213.51	337.87	394.83	590.12	-195.29	142.58

$ ^{*1} $ Region classifications are determined by MOFA.

$ ^{*} $ 2 Due to rounding, the total figure may not match the sum of each number.

$ ^{*3} $ Figures in parentheses do not include debt cancellation.

$ ^{*} $ 4 “Multiple countries” refers to assistance encompassing multiple countries such as dispatch of study teams and seminars.
2009 (calendar year)

(Net disbursements, US$ million)

Rank	Country or region	Grants	Total	Loan aid	Total
Grant aid	Technical cooperation	Amount disbursed	Amount recovered	Total
Grants provided through multilateral institutions
1	Fiji	17.33	16.44	7.20	24.53	1.30	-1.30	23.23
2	Samoa	10.36	4.12	14.48	1.49	0.00	1.49	15.97
3	Vanuatu	9.45	3.62	13.07	13.07
4	Tonga	8.72	3.00	11.72	11.72
5	Micronesia	5.57	3.81	9.38	9.38
6	Tuvalu	7.81	0.77	8.58	8.58
7	Marshall Islands	5.96	2.34	8.30	8.30
8	Kiribati	4.28	2.51	6.79	6.79
9	Palau	3.25	2.82	6.07	6.07
10	Solomon Islands	1.64	4.33	5.98	5.98
11	Nauru	2.14	0.33	2.47	2.47
12	[Niue]	0.07	0.07	0.07
13	[Cook Islands]	0.05	0.05	0.05
14	Papua New Guinea	5.54	0.64	6.95	12.48	16.64	-16.64	-4.16
Multiple countries in Oceania	4.37	4.37	0.00	0.00	0.00	4.37
Oceanian region total	82.06	17.09	46.29	128.35	1.49	17.94	-16.45	111.89

$ ^{*1} $ Region classifications are determined by MOFA.

$ ^{*2} $ Due to rounding, the total figure may not match the sum of each number.

$ ^{*} $ 3 Figures in parentheses do not include debt cancellation.

$ ^{*} $ 4 "Multiple countries" refers to assistance encompassing multiple countries such as dispatch of study teams and seminars.
# Chart III-18 Japan’s Assistance in the European Region

2009 (calendar year)

(Net disbursements, US$ million)

Rank	Country or region	Grants	Total	Loan aid	Total	Total
Grant aid	Technical cooperation	Amount disbursed	Amount recovered
Grants provided through multilateral institutions
1	Ukraine	2.81	1.90	4.71	57.14	0.00	57.14	61.85
2	Former Yugoslavia Republic of Macedonia	0.09	2.76	2.85	21.30	0.00	21.30	24.15
3	Bosnia and Herzegovina	1.84	4.54	6.39	0.00	1.44	-1.44	4.95
4	Serbia	1.14	0.34	2.60	3.74	3.74
5	Moldova	2.43	0.64	3.07	3.07
6	Montenegro	0.08	2.42	2.50	2.50
7	Belarus	0.47	0.11	0.57	0.57
8	Kosovo	0.15	0.15	0.15
9	Croatia	0.38	0.28	0.66	1.32	-1.32	-0.66
10	Albania	0.13	1.50	1.63	3.64	-3.64	-2.01
Multiple countries of the former Yugoslavia countries
Multiple countries in Europe	1.07	1.07	1.07
European region total	11.74	0.39	23.04	34.78	165.43	43.75	121.68	156.46

$ ^{*1} $ Region classifications are determined by MOFA.

$ ^{*2} $ Including graduated countries and Eastern Europe in total.

$ ^{*3} $ Due to rounding, the total figure may not match the sum of each number.

$ ^{*} $ 4 “Multiple countries” refers to assistance encompassing multiple countries such as dispatch of study teams and seminars.

$ ^{*5} $ Aid to Serbia includes aid to Kosovo, which became independent in February 2008.
undesirable effects on local society, and in particular the socially vulnerable such as those suffering from poverty, women, ethnic minorities, and disabled persons. For example, JICA promulgated its new JICA Guidelines for Environmental and Social Concern in April 2010, and conducts procedures to confirm that consideration is being paid to environmental and social factors in its preliminary surveys, environmental reviews, as well as monitoring at the implementation stage. In addition, Japan intends to incorporate the gender perspective on all project levels —including policy formulation, planning, implementation, and evaluation— in order to promote gender mainstreaming in development.

## ● Avoidance of Military Uses and of Encouragement of International Conflict

The use of Japanese ODA in developing countries for military purposes or for encouraging international conflict must be strictly avoided. Therefore, Japan does not directly assist the military or military personnel of developing countries through ODA.

At the same time, Japan proactively contributes to the fight against terrorism and for peacebuilding. However, in order to avoid materials and funds provided through assistance by Japan being used for military purposes, Japan follows the principles of ODA implementation when assistance is provided for anti-terrorism activities as well.

## ● Responses for Promoting Democratization and for Ensuring Basic Human Rights and Freedoms

In dealing with political turmoil in developing countries, there are instances where doubt exists over the democratic legitimacy of administrations established after conflict, and where a constitution, which guards against infringements of human rights, is suspended. What is more, there is fear that the basic human rights of the citizens may be infringed by such administrations under undemocratic processes. Japan is cautious and prudent when implementing ODA in such instances. Through this approach, Japan ensures that development assistance is used appropriately and conveys to the recipient country its strong concern regarding the state of democratization and human rights.

Myanmar: Myanmar is under the tight rule of a military government. Ever since the May 30, 2003 incident where Miss Daw Aung San Suu Kyi was detained by the military authorities, humanitarian projects of high-urgency, democratization, and other human resource development projects, as well as projects in CLMV countries (Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Viet Nam) and throughout the entire ASEAN region have been implemented cautiously with thorough interest and attention being paid to their content and while watching over the respective political circumstances. While requesting that the Myanmar Government make prompt progress in national reconciliation as well as in the democratization process, Japan will continue to consider economic cooperation for Myanmar in the future.
## (3) Collaboration between the Government and Implementing Organizations

MOFA works with aid implementing agencies so that the results of the Overseas Economic Cooperation Council and the Priority Policies in International Cooperation, which are created annually by MOfA, can be reflected in the prompt implementation of assistance.

In October 2008, the former JICA, which carried out technical cooperation and promotion of executing grant aid, merged with the Overseas Economic Cooperation operation in the former Japan Bank for International

## (4) Enhancing Policy Consultation

Japan holds close policy dialogue with developing countries and works to share mutual awareness and understanding in order to provide more effective development aid. While Japan still implements ODA by placing emphasis on requests from developing countries from the perspective of supporting their self-help efforts,

## (5) Enhancing Functions at the Field Level

In order to enhance policy dialogue conducted with the governments of developing countries, country-based ODA Task Forces (ODA-TFs) made up of overseas diplomatic missions and local JICA offices have been established in many developing countries. ODA-TFs fulfill a wide range of roles in addition to clarifying the needs of each recipient country. These roles include participating in the formulation of assistance policies like Country Assistance Plans and Rolling Plans, holding policy consultations with the governments of developing countries, working together with developing countries and multilateral organizations, offering suggestions on possible collaborations and reviews of aid schemes, and Cooperation (JBIC), which was in charge of providing ODA loans, to establish the new JICA. Some of the actual implementation duties for grant aid that had previously belonged to MOfA were also transferred to the new JICA. This made the new JICA a comprehensive aid implementing organization that can operate the three aid schemes (technical cooperation, grant aid, and ODA loan) in an integrated fashion.

it carries out policy consultations with governmental parties from the partner country, at a stage prior to the receipt of a request. The aim of these consultations is to allow the developing countries' development policies and assistance needs to be clearly ascertained and to achieve coordination with Japan's assistance policies.

engaging in the formation and selection of candidate assistance projects.

In addition, aid coordination is gaining momentum at the local level in accordance with the drafting and revising of Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP). Since FY2006, Japan has posted coordinators for economic cooperation at overseas diplomatic missions to provide a system for collecting information and implementing studies relating to aid coordination, as well as for providing a place for disseminating information overseas concerning Japan’s aid policies and making relevant recommendations.
Chart III-19 List of Country Assistance Programs and Countries with Country-based ODA Task Forces

Country Assistance Programs (As of October 2010)

Country Assistance Programs (As of October 2010)
Formulation	Revision
East Asia	● Indonesia	Nov. 2004
● Cambodia	Feb. 2002	under revision
● Thailand	Mar. 2000	May 2006
● China	Oct. 2001
● Philippines	Aug. 2000	Jun. 2008
● Viet Nam	Apr. 2004	Jul. 2009
● Malaysia	Feb. 2002	Apr. 2009
● Mongolia	Nov. 2004	under revision
● Laos	Sep. 2006
South Asia	● India	May. 2006
● Sri Lanka	Apr. 2004	under revision
● Pakistan	Feb. 2005
● Bangladesh	Mar. 2000	May 2006
Central Asia and the Caucasus	● Uzbekistan	Sep. 2006
● Kazakhstan	Sep. 2006
● Kyrgyz	Apr. 2009
● Tajikistan	Apr. 2009
Africa	● Ethiopia	Jun. 2008
● Ghana	Jun. 2000	Sep. 2006
● Kenya	Aug. 2000	under revision
● Zambia	Oct. 2002
● Senegal	Apr. 2009
● Tanzania	Jun. 2000	Jun. 2008
● Uganda	under formulation
● Madagascar	under formulation
Middle East	● Egypt	Jun. 2000	Jun. 2008
● Tunisia	Oct. 2002	under revision
● Jordan	under formulation
● Morocco	under formulation
Latin America and the Caribbean	● Nicaragua	Oct. 2002	under revision
● Peru	Aug. 2000	under revision
● Bolivia	Apr. 2009

Countries with Country-based ODA Task Forces

Europe	Bulgaria	Romania	Total: 2 countries
Middle East	Afghanistan	Yemen	Iran
Syria	Tunisia	Turkey
Morocco	Jordan
Total: 10 countries
Africa	Angola	Uganda	Ethiopia
Côte d'Ivoire	Democratic Republic of the Congo	Zambia
Zimbabwe	Sudan	Senegal
Botswana	Madagascar	Malawi
Mozambique	Rwanda*	Total: 20 countries
Asia	India	Indonesia	Uzbekistan
Kyrgyz	Sri Lanka	Thailand
Nepal	Pakistan	Bangladesh
Bhutan*	Viet Nam	Malaysia
Laos	Total: 21 countries
Oceania	Kiribati*	Samoa*	Solomon Islands
Nauru*	Vanuatu*	Papua New Guinea
Total: 9 countries
Latin America and the Caribbean	Argentina	Ecuador	El Salvador
Costa Rica	Colombia	Chile
Nicaragua	Panama	Paraguay
Peru	Bolivia	Honduras
Total: 18 countries

Total: 79 countries ( $ ^{*} $ including countries under shared jurisdiction)