Silviase/jgov_v1.4_full_ann huggingface dataset:
内服薬の1種類1日当たり薬剤料を薬効大分類別にみると、最も高いのは腫瘍用薬の1,258円であり、最も低いのは呼吸器官用薬の33円である。

対前年度比は、中枢神経系用薬が3.0%で最も高く、ビタミン剤が▲10.9%で最も低い。

表8 内服薬 薬効分類別1種類1日当たり薬剤料

実数(円)	対前年度比(%)
平成17年度	平成18年度	平成19年度	平成20年度	平成21年度	平成22年度	平成18年度	平成19年度	平成20年度	平成21年度	平成22年度
内服薬 総数	93	88	90	88	90	86	▲5.3	2.9	▲3.0	3.0	▲5.0
11中枢神経系用薬	71	70	74	73	77	79	▲1.2	5.7	▲1.2	5.5	3.0
112催眠鎮静剤、抗不安剤	34	32	33	31	31	30	▲4.3	1.1	▲6.4	1.1	▲4.6
114解熱鎮痛消炎剤	67	62	64	64	67	64	▲7.3	2.8	▲0.0	5.1	▲3.7
116抗パーキンソン剤	151	145	147	144	148	151	▲3.9	1.1	▲1.8	3.0	1.8
117精神神経用剤	77	78	84	83	87	90	1.9	7.4	▲1.1	4.9	3.4
119その他中枢神経用薬	442	423	430	429	448	449	▲4.4	1.7	▲0.2	4.3	0.2
21循環器官用薬	96	90	92	87	88	82	▲6.3	1.8	▲5.7	2.0	▲7.6
212不整脈用剤	129	120	119	111	110	98	▲7.0	▲0.2	▲7.0	▲1.1	▲10.7
214血压降下剤	125	119	121	113	115	107	▲5.4	2.4	▲7.1	1.6	▲6.8
217血管拡張剤	72	67	67	62	61	52	▲7.1	0.4	▲7.6	▲1.4	▲15.4
218高脂血症用剤	126	112	110	103	104	95	▲11.1	▲1.5	▲6.3	0.9	▲8.9
22呼吸器官用薬	41	38	38	36	36	33	▲7.5	▲1.1	▲5.2	0.5	▲9.3
23消化器官用薬	56	53	54	53	54	50	▲6.2	3.3	▲3.1	3.6	▲7.9
232消化性潰瘍用剤	76	71	73	71	73	66	▲7.3	3.7	▲3.4	3.4	▲9.4
239その他の消化器官用薬	88	85	87	85	89	87	▲4.2	2.2	▲1.5	4.8	▲2.2
25泌尿生殖器官および肛門用薬	161	145	151	147	150	140	▲9.8	4.2	▲2.7	1.9	▲6.2
31ビタミン剤	55	51	50	46	45	40	▲8.1	▲1.6	▲8.1	▲1.4	▲10.9
32滋養強壮薬	115	112	116	114	118	112	▲2.1	2.9	▲1.0	2.8	▲4.9
325蛋白アミノ酸製剤	734	687	678	640	629	580	▲6.5	▲1.3	▲5.6	▲1.7	▲7.8
33血液・体液用薬	90	85	90	90	95	91	▲5.1	5.6	0.3	5.5	▲4.4
39その他の代謝性医薬品	113	108	113	112	115	110	▲4.8	5.3	▲0.9	2.8	▲4.8
396糖尿病用剤	90	84	86	82	83	80	▲6.6	2.2	▲4.6	0.5	▲3.5
399他に分類されない代謝性医薬品	246	233	262	295	322	313	▲5.1	12.2	12.8	9.0	▲2.7
42腫瘍用薬	1,240	1,221	1,262	1,266	1,300	1,258	▲1.5	3.4	0.3	2.7	▲3.2
422代謝拡抗剤	1,459	1,469	1,564	1,598	1,651	1,688	0.7	6.5	2.2	3.3	2.2
429その他の腫瘍用薬	1,147	1,122	1,144	1,147	1,186	1,136	▲2.1	1.9	0.3	3.4	▲4.2
44アレルギー用薬	132	124	128	125	129	120	▲6.0	3.6	▲2.8	3.5	▲7.1
52漢方製剤	111	104	102	97	95	90	▲6.1	▲1.9	▲5.4	▲1.8	▲5.2
61抗生物質製剤	223	210	210	199	202	187	▲5.8	▲0.3	▲5.2	1.6	▲7.4
613グラム陽性・陰性菌に作用するもの	241	223	223	215	215	198	▲7.5	0.1	▲3.8	0.4	▲8.0
614グラム陽性菌、マイコラズマに作用するもの	226	212	207	189	193	178	▲6.2	▲2.4	▲8.5	2.0	▲7.6
62化学療法剤	576	529	531	518	531	511	▲8.2	0.3	▲2.5	2.6	▲3.8
624合成抗菌剤	501	470	481	470	480	445	▲6.2	2.3	▲2.3	2.2	▲7.4
625抗ウイルス剤	1,259	1,232	1,320	1,252	1,139	1,280	▲2.1	7.1	▲5.2	▲9.0	12.4

注)表示していない項目(薬効)がある。
## 医療関係従事者

## 概要

## 医師数等の概要

医師及び歯科医師数は、年々増加しており、2008（平成20）年12月31日現在、医師286,699人、歯科医師99,426人。

## 医療関係従事者数

· 医師

· 菌科医師

· 薬剤師

286,699人

99,426人

267,751人

資料：厚生労働省大臣官房統計情報部「平成20年医師・歯科医師・薬剤師調査」

·保健師 53,212人

· 助產師 ___ 31,312人

· 看護師 954,818 人

· 准看護師 394,430 人

資料：厚生労働省医政局調べ。(H20)

· 理学療法士 (PT) 45,358.3人

· 作業療法士 (OT) 26,261.3人

· 視能訓練士 5,603.4人

· 言語聽覽士 8,583.3人

· 義肢裝具士 141.9人

· 斷科衛生士 84,777.5人

· 斷科技工士 11,651.3人

· 診療放射線技師 46,115.8人

· 臨床檢查技師 59,759.4人

· 臨床工学技士 16,559.2人

資料：厚生労働省大臣官房統計情報部「平成20年医療施設調査・病院報告」※常勤換算の数値

・就業あん摩マッサージ指圧師 104,663人

・就業はり師 92,421人

・就業きゅう師 90,664人

・就業柔道整復師 50,428人

資料：厚生労働省大臣官房統計情報部「平成22年度保健・衛生行政業務報告（衛生行政報告例）」

※東日本大震災の影響により、宮城県を除いて集計した数値

· 救急救命士 37,567 人

資料：厚生労働省医政局調べ。(H21.12.31現在)
詳細データ $ ^{④} $ 看護職員数の推移

資料：厚生労働省医政局調べ。

## 詳細データ⑤ 第七次看護職員需給見通し

2010（平成22）年12月に策定された「第七次看護職員需給見通し」においては、2016（平成27）年には、看護職員の需要見通しが約150万1千人に、供給見通しが約148万6千人に達する見込みとなっている。

1992（平成4）年制定の「看護師等の人材確保の促進に関する法律」及びこれに基づく基本指針に基づき、資質の向上、養成力の確保、再就業の促進、離職の防止等総合的な看護職員確保対策が講じられている。

（单位：人、常勤换算）

区 分	平成23年	平成24年	平成25年	平成26年	平成27年
需 要 見 通 し	1,404,300	1,430,900	1,454,800	1,477,700	1,500,900
①病 院	899,800	919,500	936,600	951,500	965,700
②診 療 所	232,000	234,500	237,000	239,400	242,200
③助 産 所	2,300	2,300	2,400	2,400	2,400
④訪問看護ステーション	28,400	29,700	30,900	32,000	33,200
⑤介護保険関係	153,300	155,100	157,300	160,900	164,700
⑥社会福祉施設、在宅サービス(⑤を除く)	19,700	20,400	20,900	21,500	22,100
⑦看護師等学校養成所	17,600	17,700	17,700	17,800	17,900
⑧保健所・市町村	37,500	37,600	37,800	38,000	38,200
⑨事業所、研究機関等	13,800	14,000	14,100	14,300	14,500
供 給 見 通 し	1,348,300	1,379,400	1,412,400	1,448,300	1,486,000
①年当初就業者数	1,320,500	1,348,300	1,379,400	1,412,400	1,448,300
②新卒就業者数	49,400	50,500	51,300	52,400	52,700
③再就業者数	123,000	126,400	129,600	133,400	137,100
④退職等による減少数	144,600	145,900	147,900	149,900	152,100
需要見通しと供給見通しの差	56,000	51,500	42,400	29,500	14,900
(供給見通し/需要見通し)	96.0%	96.4%	97.1%	98.0%	99.0%

（注）四捨五入のため、各項目の数値の合計等は一致しない。
## Part 2

## Primary Measures Related to Immigration Control Administration in FY 2004
## Chapter 1 Basic Plan for Immigration Control (3rd Edition)

In accordance with Article 61-10 of the Immigration Control Act, the Minister of Justice shall formulate the Basic Plan for Immigration Control, which regulates the entry and residence of foreign nationals, in order to exercise equitable control over immigration affairs. Specifically, in accordance with Article 61-10, Paragraph 2 of the said Act, the Basic Plan shall stipulate the following things: (1) Matters relating to foreign nationals entering into and residing in Japan; (2) Matters relating to guidelines for the control of entry and residence of foreign nationals; and (3) Matters necessary for implementation of the control of entry and residence of foreign nationals.

On March 29, 2005, it was decided that a third plan should be formulated in order to specify basic immigration control measures at home and abroad and to implement them appropriately in order to adequately respond to ever-changing social needs for immigration control procedures. Such measures include Japan's efforts to establish Japan as a country built on tourism by encouraging foreign travelers to visit Japan, to more openly accept highly-skilled workers in professional or technical fields, to address the age of population decline, to halve the number of illegal residents and stringently prevent terrorists from entering Japan. When drafting the Basic Plan, the immigration control administration consulted the related ministries and agencies and drew upon the report submitted by the Informal Policy Conference on Immigration Control, a private conference organized by the Minister of Justice.

The First Basic Plan was formulated by the immigration control administration in May 1992 and the Second Basic Plan in March 2000.

## Section 1 — Considerations for Drawing up the Basic Plan for Immigration Control (3rd Edition)

## 1 Informal Policy Conference on Immigration Control

(1) Discussions at the Informal Policy Conference on Immigration Control

The Informal Policy Conference on Immigration Control (hereinafter referred to as

“Policy Conference”) consists of experts from various fields and provides the Minister
of Justice with their expert opinions on immigration control. When drafting the First Immigration Control Basic Plan in May 1992 and the Second Basic Plan in March 2000, the immigration control administration drew upon the expert opinions of the Policy Conference.

When the immigration control administration prepared the Second Basic Plan in March 2000, the Fourth Policy Conference also started its activities. Up until December 2004, the Policy Conference held 24 sessions to discuss various topics, such as matters that should be carried over from the Second Basic Plan as well as matters that should be incorporated into the Third Plan. Specifically, the Policy Conference discussed possible measures to promote the acceptance of foreign workers in professional or technical fields, respond to a population-declining society, accept foreign college and pre-college students, encourage foreign tourists to visit Japan, improve training and technical internship programs, as well as measures for foreign nationals staying in Japan for a prolonged period and illegal residents. In addition, the conference also held hearing sessions with related agencies to fully discuss proper policy initiatives.

After ironing out differences in their opinions, the Policy Conference submitted a report titled “Necessary Immigration Control Measures in the Immediate Future for a Population-Declining Society: Toward a Proper Balance between Smoother Services and Stricter Actions” to the Minister of Justice on December 21, 2004.

## (2) Report of the Immigration Control Policy Conference

An outline of the report submitted by the Policy Conference to the Minister of Justice on December 21, 2004 titled “Necessary Immigration Control Measures in the Immediate Future for a of Population-Declining Society: Toward a Proper Balance between Smoother Services and Stricter Actions” is given below.

### A. Smooth Acceptance of Foreign Nationals Necessary to Japan

## (A) Promoting Further Acceptance of Foreign Workers in Professional and Technical Fields

To ensure sustainable growth for the Japanese economy, Japanese society will be in great need of high-quality human resources that will enhance Japan's total factor productivity (TFP). In addition, owing to deeper economic interdependence with foreign countries there is greater demand for high-quality workers knowledgeable in the field of trade. Cooperation between Japanese and foreign workers will vitalize Japan's economy. In this context, in order to openly accept a greater number of foreign workers in professional and technical fields, it is important to provide adequate information on the current immigration control schemes, disclose case
examples related to immigration control procedures, and make efforts for prompt immigration examination. In addition, since diversified business activities create various demands for foreign workers, it is important to seek a new immigration control scheme capable of addressing the various corporate demands for foreign workers.

Even under the current immigration control system, Japan can accept highly skilled foreign workers in professional and technical fields. However, as international competition to secure outstanding foreign nationals has intensified on a global scale, the immigration control administration needs to grant a longer period of stay and to take other measures to further promote the acceptance of foreign workers from foreign countries.

## (B) Issues of the Immigration Control Administration Responding to a Population-Declining Age

To maintain and enhance Japan’s industrial and economic vitality in a population-declining age and improve national living standards, the government needs to take all possible policy measures in various fields. First of all, the immigration control administration should further promote acceptance of foreign workers in professional and technical fields as mentioned above. On the other hand, it is unrealistic to simply make up the supply of a productive population by accepting foreign nationals alone because Japan would have to accept too many foreign workers in this case.

However, taking into account possible future obstacles to Japan’s economic activities, while paying attention to public opinion it is necessary to give consideration to accept foreign workers in fields that are not valued as professional or technical at present.

When giving consideration, it is necessary to find a proper measure that will prevent potential problems, maintain Japan's safety and public order and smoothly accept foreign workers in fields that are not valued as professional or technical at present. In this context, in order to accept foreign workers in these fields, consideration should be given to cases where the industry is not focused on import-substitutes (or less focused), where the field is labor-intensive, shows a long-term demand and where it is difficult to find Japanese workers to make up the demand.

## (C) Enhancing International Relations through Human Resources Development

Training and technical internship programs are expected to play more of an important role in the future because Asia is likely to see continuous economic growth.