Silviase/jgov_v1.4_full_ann huggingface dataset:
## 平成21年度以降も競争性のない随意契約とならざるを得ないもの（平成20年度下半期分）

(府省名：宮内庁)

契約名称及び内容	契約担当官等の氏名並びにその所属する部局の名称及び所在地	契約締結日	契約の相手方の商号又は名称及び住所	随意契約によることとした会計法令の根拠条文及び理由	予定価格	契約金額	落札率	再就職の役員の数	随意契約によることを得ない事由	随意契約によることを得ない事由	備考
皇居山里門石垣修復第3回工事	支出負担行為担当官宮内庁長官官房主計課長高木隆東京都千代田区千代田1-1	平成20年10月14日	清水建設株式会社東京都港区芝浦一丁目2番3号	会計法第29条の3第4項(競争に付することが不利と認められる場合)	68,271,000	68,250,000	99.9%	-	本工事は前回までの工事に引き続き、同一施設において継続的に施工された事で、前回工事と本工事の施工者が異なる場合は瑕疵担保責任の範囲が不明確になる等密接不可分な関係にあることから、一貫した施工が技術的に必要と判断され、工期の短縮、経費の節減、安全・円滑かつ適切な施工を確保するうえでも前回工事施工者以外の者に施工させることが不利と認められるため。	③口
ピアノの修理	支出負担行為担当官宮内庁長官官房主計課長高木隆東京都千代田区千代田1-1	平成20年10月16日	株式会社松尾楽器商会東京都千代田区有楽町1丁目5番1号	会計法第29条の3第4項(契約の性質又は目的が競争を許さない場合)	3,777,900	3,572,961	94.6%	-	ピアノ修理(オーバーホール)については、スタインウェイピアノを修理(オーバーホール)する上で必要な設備を完備していること、スタインウェイピアノについて専門に扱える技術者が多数在籍していることが選定の条件となるが、これらの条件を満たしている相手方は(株)松尾楽器商会のみであった。同社は、スタインウェイピアノを修理(オーバーホール)する上で必要な設備を完備した専門施設を有している国内唯一の業者であり、なおかつこのピアノの寄贈以来、調律等メンテナンスについて一貫して請け負ってきている実績がありこのピアノのメカニック面はもとより劣化状況についても把握しているため。	二(二)
列車座席借上	支出負担行為担当官宮内庁長官官房主計課長高木隆東京都千代田区千代田1-1	平成20年10月20日	東海旅客铁道株式会社愛知県名古屋市中村区名駅一丁目1番4号JRセントラルタワーズ	会計法第29条の3第5項及び予算決算及び会計令第99条第8号(運送又は保管をさせるとき)	2,324,480	2,324,480	100.0%	-	天皇皇后両陛下の行幸啓に当たり新幹線の座席を借り上げたもの。御利用区間で新幹線を運行する会社は同社以外にないため。	二(二)
賢所等改修第7回工事	支出負担行為担当官宮内庁長官官房主計課長高木隆東京都千代田区千代田1-1	平成20年11月17日	株式会社大林組東京本社東京都港区港南2丁目15番2号	会計法第29条の3第4項(競争に付することが不利と認められる場合)	398,160,000	397,950,000	99.9%	-	本工事は前回までの工事に引き続き、同一施設において継続的に施工された事で、前回工事と本工事の施工者が異なる場合は瑕疵担保責任の範囲が不明確になる等密接不可分な関係にあることから、一貫した施工が技術的に必要と判断され、工期の短縮、経費の節減、安全・円滑かつ適切な施工を確保するうえでも前回工事施工者以外の者に施工させることが不利と認められるため。	③口
御所ほか自動制御設備改修工事	支出負担行為担当官宮内庁長官官房主計課長高木隆東京都千代田区千代田1-1	平成20年11月18日	株式会社山武東京都千代田区丸の内二丁目7番3号	会計法第29条の3第4項(契約の性質又は目的が競争を許さない場合)	7,773,150	7,770,000	99.9%	-	本工事は、御所・宮殿等の各建物に設置されている自動制御設備の一部を改修する工事である。当該自動制御設備は、各建物の空調設備等の運転を適切に制御するための設備である。本工事では、当該自動制御設備が関わる空調設備等の稼働から停止まで一連の運転を正常に制御し、運転状態の監視も常時できるよう製造者だけが持つ独自のデータに基づき調整する必要がある。従って、本工事では他社では知り得ない当該設備の詳細な内部構造・特性などに精通し、製造時の技術資料やデータを保有している製造者による施工が必要であり、他社では修理後の試運転において当該設備が正常に機能していることを確認し判断することが極めて困難であるため、当該設備を製造したもの以外に施工させた場合、適切に動作しない等著しい支障が生じる恐れがある。(株)山武は、当該設備を設計・製造した会社であり、当該設備を熟知した唯一の会社であるため。	二(へ)
天皇誕生日、新年一般参賀につき風防室布設及び撤去	支出負担行為担当官宮内庁長官官房主計課長高木隆東京都千代田区千代田1-1	平成20年11月27日	トステム株式会社ビル改装東京支店東京都台東区北上野1-8-1住友不動産上野ビル3号館	会計法第29条の3第4項(契約の性質又は目的が競争を許さない場合)	(非公表)	2,467,500	-	-	本業務は、天皇誕生日及び新年一般参賀の実施にあたり、宮殿ベランダに仮設風防室等を布設する業務である。風防室は、天皇陛下を始めとする皇族方が御使用になられる施設であり、年末年始の行事が集中する時期に、短期間で安全かつ確実に組み立てることが求められるため、その構造及び組み立て方法を熟知したもの以外に本業務を任せた場合、宮殿行事等に多大な支障をきたすれがある。トステム株は、本業務の布設対象となるサッシを製造したメーカーであり、同業務を幾度となく請け負った実績を有しているイナックストステム・ビルリモデリング(株)と合併し、その業務を引き継いだ会社であるため、風防室の構造、組立方法、取り扱い方法、現場状況等を十分熟知し、本業務を安全かつ確実に実施することの出来る唯一の業者であるため。	二(へ)
給与等事務処理システムのメンテナンス業務	支出負担行為担当官宮内庁長官官房主計課長高木隆東京都千代田区千代田1-1	平成21年2月20日	富士通株式会社東京都港区東新橋1-5-2汐留シティセンター	会計法第29条の3第4項(契約の性質又は目的が競争を許さない場合)	2,305,800	2,305,800	100%	-	本業務は,給与システムのプログラムを給与法改正に基づくメンテナンスを計るもので,同社は同システムを構築し,運用支援を受託していることから,システム全体の詳細構成を把握している唯一の業者であり,本業務を他の業者に行わせた場合,新規機能上既存データの整合性等における不具合を生じる恐れがあるため,同社以外には行えないため。	二(へ)
赤坂設備センター新築機械設備第4回工事	支出負担行為担当官宮内庁長官官房主計課長高木隆東京都千代田区千代田1-1	平成21年2月23日	第一工業株式会社東京都千代田区丸の内三丁目3番1号	会計法第29条の3第4項(競争に付することが不利と認められる場合)	9,931,950	9,922,500	99.9%	-	本工事は前回までの工事に引き続き,同一施設において継続的に施工される工事で,前回工事と本工事の施工者が異なる場合は瑕疵担保責任の範囲が不明確になる等密接不可分な関係にあることから,一貫した施工が技術的に必要と判断され,工期の短縮,経費の節減,安全・円滑かつ適切な施工を確保するうえでも前回工事施工者以外の者に施工させることが不利と認められるため。	③口
赤坂設備センター新築電気設備ほか第4回工事	支出負担行為担当官宮内庁長官官房主計課長高木隆東京都千代田区千代田1-1	平成21年2月23日	株式会社開電工東京都港区芝浦4丁目8番33号	会計法第29条の3第4項(競争に付することが不利と認められる場合)	9,666,300	9,555,000	98.8%	-	本工事は前回までの工事に引き続き,同一施設において継続的に施工される工事で,前回工事と本工事の施工者が異なる場合は瑕疵担保責任の範囲が不明確になる等密接不可分な関係にあることから,一貫した施工が技術的に必要と判断され,工期の短縮,経費の節減,安全・円滑かつ適切な施工を確保するうえでも前回工事施工者以外の者に施工させることが不利と認められるため。	③口
東宮御所配管設備改修ほか第2回工事	支出負担行為担当官宮内庁長官官房主計課長高木隆東京都千代田区千代田1-1	平成21年2月27日	清水建設株式会社東京都港区芝浦一丁目2番3号	会計法第29条の3第4項(競争に付することが不利と認められる場合)	130,935,000	130,200,000	99.4%	-	本工事は前回までの工事に引き続き,同一施設において継続的に施工される工事で,前回工事と本工事の施工者が異なる場合は瑕疵担保責任の範囲が不明確になる等密接不可分な関係にあることから,一貫した施工が技術的に必要と判断され,工期の短縮,経費の節減,安全・円滑かつ適切な施工を確保するうえでも前回工事施工者以外の者に施工させることが不利と認められるため。	③口
航空機座席借上料	支出負担行為担当官長官官房主計課長高木隆東京都千代田区千代田1-1	平成21年3月6日	社団法人国際交流サービス協会東京都千代田区霞ヶ関2-2-1	会計法第29条の3第5項及び予算決算及び会計令第99条第8号(運送又は保管をさせるとき)	8,567,840	7,887,660	92%	-	皇太子殿下ルコ御旅行に伴う随従員の航空機座席借上の契約である。随従員は円滑業務遂行のため,皇太子殿下同じ飛行機である必要がある。市場調査の上,最も安価な金額のあつた者を契約の相手方とした。	二(二)
赤坂設備センター周辺整備に伴う解体撤去ほか第3回工事	支出負担行為担当官宮内庁長官官房主計課長高木隆東京都千代田区千代田1-1	平成21年3月13日	中島建設株式会社東京都足立区堀之内一丁目2番11号	会計法第29条の3第4項(競争に付することが不利と認められる場合)	4,319,700	4,305,000	99.7%	-	本工事は前回までの工事に引き続き,同一施設において継続的に施工される工事で,前回工事と本工事の施工者が異なる場合は瑕疵担保責任の範囲が不明確になる等密接不可分な関係にあることから,一貫した施工が技術的に必要と判断され,工期の短縮,経費の節減,安全・円滑かつ適切な施工を確保するうえでも前回工事施工者以外の者に施工させることが不利と認められるため。	③口
室料	支出負担行為担当官長官官房主計課長高木隆東京都千代田区千代田1-1	平成21年3月18日	株式会社ズイカインターナジオル長野県下高井郡山ノ内町大宇夜瀬間12377-6	会計法第29条の3第4項(契約の性質又は目的が競争を許さない場合)	1,870,000	1,870,000	100%	-	皇太子同妃両殿下及び愛子内親王殿下の長野県行啓に際して,東宮侍従を始めとする供奉員は,それぞれの職務が円滑に進められるよう,お三方のお泊所と同じ施設で相当数の部屋を職務用として借り上げる必要があるため。	二(二)
書籍「親王・公家和歌懐紙」2巻「幸仁親王自筆書状」1幅「東寺関係文書」1巻	支出負担行為担当官宮内庁長官官房主計課長高木隆東京都千代田区千代田1-1	平成21年3月25日	株式会社思文閣出版京都府京都市左京区田中関田町2-7	会計法第29条の3第4項(契約の性質又は目的が競争を許さない場合)	9,250,000	9,250,000	100.00%	-	当庁における事務・事業の遂行に必要な一級の資料で皇室用図書として保存管理すべき価値を有するため購入するものであるが,本邦に1点しかない古書籍であって,契約の性質が競争を許さないため。	二(二)
Part 2

Primary Measures Related to

Immigration Control

Administration in FY 2008
## Chapter 1 Outline of the New System of Residence Management

At the 171st session of the Diet, the “law for partial amendment to the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act and the Special Act on the Immigration Control of, Inter Alia, Those who have Lost Japanese Nationality Pursuant to in the Treaty of Peace with Japan” was approved and enacted on July 8, 2009. On July 15 of the same year, it was promulgated (Act No. 79, 2009). The outline is as follows:

## Section 1 ☐ Outline of the Amended Law

## 1 Measures on the New System of Residence Management

Under the existing residence management system, the Minister of Justice manages residence information on foreign nationals at a specific point in time, through examinations based on necessary materials submitted by foreign nationals at the time of applying for permission to enter Japan or to extend the period of stay, etc. Changes in the situation of foreign nationals during the period of stay are monitored through the Alien Registration System by municipalities. On the other hand, foreign nationals are not covered by the Basic Residents' Register System under existing laws. In reality, the municipalities treat foreign nationals who have been registered on the alien registration cards as their residents and use such information as a basis for providing various administrative services.

However, as Japan globalized and an increasing number of foreign nationals, so-called newcomers, came to live in Japan for diverse purposes, the constitution of foreign nationals residing in Japan has significantly changed compared with the time immediately after the end of the War. There have appeared many newcomers who did not have stable livelihoods in Japan and failed to apply for alien registration properly, who frequently changed address without reporting, or who returned to their home country after being granted a re-entry permit and then cut off contact while staying in their country, and regarding the latter, it is not known whether they intended to re-enter Japan.

According to changes in the constitution of foreign nationals and their behavioral patterns, it has been more difficult to keep precise information related to foreign nationals, including their actual state of residence, under two separate laws of the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act and the Alien Registration Act. There are some problems from the perspective of immigration control administration and provision of proper administrative services to foreign nationals.

Under such circumstances, the Government set up the Working Team Concerning the Residence
## (1) Measures for establishing a system that enables the Minister of Justice to keep necessary information continuously

A. The Minister of Justice shall grant a residence card specifying basic matters related to identification, status of residence, period of stay, etc. to foreign nationals residing in Japan with the status of residence under the Immigration Control Act as medium to long-term residents (hereinafter referred to as "medium to long-term residents", except those who fall under any of the following: (i) Those whose period of stay for three months or less has been approved; (ii) Those whose status of residence as "Temporary Visitor" has been approved; (iii) Those whose status of residence for "Diplomat" or "Official" has been approved; (iv) Those who are stipulated as equivalent to the above foreign nationals by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice.

B. Medium to long-term residents shall inform the Minister of Justice of the addresses of main residence in Japan (hereinafter referred to as "place of residence") where they decide to reside after landing through heads of the municipalities where they live, within a certain period of time (place of residence will be included on their residence cards).

C. Medium to long-term residents shall inform the Minister of Justice of any change in not only the matters included on their residence cards (change of place of residence will be informed through municipal heads), but also the organizations to which they belong and their personal status or position according to their status of residence.

D. The Minister of Justice shall be allowed to obtain information about specific foreign nationals from the organization to which they belong.

E. The Minister of Justice shall be allowed to conduct surveys to confirm matters notified, if necessary, in order to continuously keep information about specific foreign nationals.

F. Registering of false place of residence and failing to continue to engage in activities as a spouse while residing in Japan for six months or more in spite of residing under the status of residence which is based on the status as a spouse without justifiable reason shall be added to conditions of revocation of status of residence. Provisions on delivery of documents regarding procedures for revocation of status of residence shall be established.

G. With regard to forgery of residence cards, penal provisions conditions of forced deportation shall be established. Penalty related to illegal employment shall be revised.

## (2) Measures for enhancing the convenience of foreign nationals legally residing in Japan

A. The maximum period of stay shall be extended to five years.

B. Foreign nationals and special permanent residents who have valid passports and residence cards (special permanent resident certificates in the case of special permanent residents) and who re-enters Japan within one year from their departure in principle (two years in the case
of special permanent residents) shall not need to apply for re-entry permits, and it shall be considered that they have been granted re-entry permits only if they convey their intention of re-entry to an immigration inspector when they leave Japan. Previously, there had been various requests for review of the re-entry permit system. The introduction of the new system of residence management will allow the Minister of Justice to precisely keep residence conditions of medium to long-term residents, and to reduce the need to confirm residence conditions in relation to applications for re-entry permits. The new re-entry permit system ensures further convenience of foreign nationals.

## (3) Measures for special permanent residents

A. The Minister of Justice shall grant a special permanent resident certificate that certifies the legal status as special permanent resident.

B. Special permanent residents shall be allowed to extend the valid period of re-entry, and in principle, to re-enter within a certain period of time without applying for a re-entry permit.

## (4) Date of implementation

Measures related to the new system of residence management shall be implemented on the date designated by a Cabinet order within three years from the date of promulgation.

## 2 Measures on Matters Other Than the New System of Residence Management

## (1) Measures for reviewing the foreign trainee system

To deal with the situation where an increasing number of foreign trainees and technical interns are inappropriately treated as low-wage workers, (see Chapter 2), the industrial training and technical internship program was reformed to strengthen the protection of foreign trainees and technical interns by implementing necessary measures.

Specifically, necessary provisions were established based on the “Three-Year Plan for Promotion of Regulatory Reform (Revised)” decided by the Cabinet on March 25, 2008. The plan includes the application of labor-related laws and regulations to trainees during their internship and the establishment of status of residence for technical interns, and states that the relevant bills should be submitted to an ordinary session of the Diet in 2009 at the latest.

In addition to the above, it has become possible to deport those who introduce trainees to companies other than those permitted to implement the training program, or those who are involved in preparing documents that contain false statement in order to help trainees to enter Japan.
A. The status of residence of “Technical Intern Training” was established to ensure that labor-related laws and regulations can be applied to activities by those who have obtained the status of residence of “Trainee”, which covers internship (except those who are accepted by the national government, local government, or the organizations which is provided for by a Ministry of Justice ordinance), and those who have acquired skills by engaging in such activities can engage in work that requires skills acquired based on the employment contract.

B. For the purpose of addressing malicious brokers who are involved in preparing documents containing false statements, including employment certificates in order to help trainees to enter Japan, the conditions of forced deportation applicable to those who are involved in aiding and abetting for document forgery were stipulated.

C. This provision shall be enacted on the date designated by a Cabinet order within a year from the date of promulgation.

## (2) Measures for integrating the two statuses of residence of

## “College Student” and “Pre-college Student”

After the then Prime Minister Fukuda proposed the “300,000 Foreign Students Plan” in his policy speech in January 2008, the outline of the plan was compiled by ministries and agencies concerned, including the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, in July of the same year.

In order to listen to various experts' views on how immigration control administration should be run with a view to the realization of the "300,000 Foreign Students Plan", discussions had been made at the Discussion Meeting on Immigration Control Policy, a private consultative group for the Minister of Justice. This January the "Proposal on Acceptance of College Students and Pre-college Students" (see Chapter 3) prepared by the discussion meeting were reported to the Minister of Justice. Based on the proposals, two statuses of residence of "College Student" and "Pre-college Student" were integrated into one status of residence of "College Student" to ensure that foreign college students can stably reside in Japan.

This provision shall be enacted on the date designated by a Cabinet order within a year from the date of promulgation.

## (3) Establishment of the Immigration Detention Facilities Visiting Committee

The aim of facilities, such as Immigration Detention Centers (hereinafter referred to as "immigration detention facilities"), is to temporarily detain foreign nationals who fall under any of the conditions of forced deportation to achieve the administrative goal of deporting such foreign nationals. The actual situation of those facilities cannot be open to the public due to
concerns about detainees' privacy and the detention facility's security. Therefore, international organizations and human rights groups have been calling for the establishment of a third-party organization to supervise the operation of those facilities.

Efforts to ensure appropriate treatment through the objection petition system specified in the Detainee Treatment Regulation have now been promoted. Although recently, the Penal Institution Visiting Committee and the Detention Facilities Visiting Committee had been established in penal institutions and detention facilities, respectively, it was decided to establish the Immigration Detention Facilities Visiting Committee in immigration detention facilities in order to ensure transparency in treating detainees. This is because an immigration detention facility, which is a facility to detain people and needs to ensure transparency in its operations, is similar to the above facilities, regardless of having a different purpose and the nature of detention.

This provision shall be enacted on the date designated by a Cabinet order within a year from the date of promulgation.

## (4) Clear wording of the prohibition of deportation under the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

It is pointed out that "The State party should ensure that all measures and practices relating to the detention and deportation of immigrants are in full conformity with article 3 of the Convention. In particular, the State party should expressly prohibit deportation to countries where there are substantial grounds for believing that the individuals to be deported would be in danger of being subjected to torture. In the light of such a suggestion, the statutory provision was established to clarify that countries to which forced deportees are expatriated shall not include "State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture" specified in Paragraph 1, Article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (hereinafter referred to as "Convention against Torture").

The conclusion of the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (hereinafter referred to as “Convention against Enforced Disappearance”) was approved at the 171st session of the Diet. This convention contains provisions similar to Paragraph 1, Article 3 of the Convention against Torture, and it was decided to make a provision to clarify such prohibition.

The provision of the Convention against Torture was enacted on the date of promulgation, and the provision of the Convention against Enforced Disappearance will be enacted on the date when the Convention becomes effective in Japan.
## (5) Measures for special exceptions on the period of stay for those who have filed applications such as for extension of the period of stay

With regard to foreign nationals who filed applications such as for extension of the period of stay by the expiration date of the period of stay and have not received official decision by the said date, a special provision was made. This provision enables them to continue staying in Japan with the same status of residence by the date the decision is made or the date in two months after the expiration date, whichever comes earlier.

The aim of this provision is to respond to various problems, for example, in the case where a foreign college student is forced to apply for an extension of the period of stay just before expiration because the applicant may be required to submit a grade report as a document attached to application forms for change of status of residence or extension of the period of stay, it may be too severe to consider the applicant as an overstayer just because official decision on the application has not been made during the period of stay. In addition, an applicant regarded as an overstayer cannot acquire a permit to engage in activities other than those permitted under the status of residence, nor a re-entry permit. Moreover, the situation may affect the link between the new system of residence management and the Basic Residents' Register System for Foreign Nationals.

This provision shall be enacted on the date designated by a Cabinet order within a year from the date of promulgation.

## (6) Measures for special exceptions with respect to denial of landing

Conditions for denial of landing specified in the Paragraph 1, Article 5 of the Immigration Control Act shall be classified into categories according to cases where foreign nationals should not be permitted to land in Japan, including the case of those who have been deported from Japan due to overstay, and all foreign nationals who fall under any of these categories shall be uniformly denied permission for landing.

For example, a foreign national who met and married a Japanese citizen in his/her home country during the period of denial of landing due to a past forced deportation, must obtain special permission for landing through a three-step procedure by an immigration inspector, a special inquiry officer, and the Minister of Justice every time the foreign national intends to re-enter Japan, even if the foreign national was once granted special permission for landing by the Minister of Justice in consideration of various factors. The aim is to respond to the above cases of less appropriateness by enabling the Minister of Justice to decide not to deny landing of a foreign national when he/she finds that there are reasonable grounds to do so, even if such foreign national falls under any of the conditions for denial of landing.

This provision shall be enacted on the date designated by a Cabinet order within a year.
from the date of promulgation.

## (7) Measures for obligation of those with landing permission for crew members to carry and present identification such as a valid crew member's pocket-ledger

Under the existing law, foreign nationals who have obtained landing permission for crew members are obliged to carry and present their crew member's landing permits. However, the problem is that such foreign nationals cannot be identified as those granted landing permission for crew members because crew member's landing permits have no head-shot photo. The Action Plan for the Realization of a Crime-Resistant Society 2008 (decided at the Ministerial Conference to Discuss Countermeasures against Crime on December 22, 2008), which was developed on December 2008, specifies that, with regard to crew members of an aircraft or vessel who landed after obtaining landing permission for crew members, obligation to carry passports or crew member's pocket-ledgers with them will be reviewed in order to appropriately confirm the identity of such crew members. To respond to this, it was stipulated that those who have obtained landing permission for crew members shall be obliged to carry and present their passport or crew member's pocket-ledgers, as well as their crew member's landing permits.

This provision shall be enacted on the date designated by a Cabinet order within six months from the date of promulgation.

## (8) Measures for establishment of conditions for deportation in order to appropriately deal with activities involving encouragement of illegal employment

In order to ensure a consistent response to activities involving encouragement of illegal employment, the conditions for forced deportation due to activities involving encouragement of illegal employment were revised.

This provision shall be enacted on the date designated by a Cabinet order within a year from the date of promulgation.

## Section 2 ♦ Partial Amendment of the Basic Residents' Registration Act (Establishment of the Basic Residents' Register System for Foreign Nationals)