Silviase/jgov_v1.4_full_ann huggingface dataset:
Figure 4-3-14 Eco-town projects

Eco-town projects
This is a program based on the zero-emissions concept, which aims to completely eliminate waste through the use of all waste from industry as raw materials in other sectors. Eco-town projects seek to create communities in harmony with the environment while fostering regional development. To date, 26 regions have been approved. One project related to rare metals is the “Northern Akita Prefecture Eco-town Plan” (approved in November 1999), which intends to promote metal recycling in a region that was once one of the world’s richest mining areas, by using its mine and refinery facilities.
<Outline of the Northern Akita Prefecture Eco-town Plan>
Facilities	Operating entity	Project description
Home appliance recycling facilities	Eco-Recycle Co., Ltd.	◆Recycles four types of home appliances pursuant to the Home Appliance Recycling Law, along with office equipment (6,000 t/yr in throughput)
Four types of home appliances, etc.
Nonferrous metal collection facilities	Ecosystem Kosaka Co., Ltd.	Shredder dust Waste circuit boards
Metallic vapor collection furnace
Collects metals from circuit boards containing valuable metals (removed from end-of-life home appliances) by using them as recycled raw materials in a refinery (50,000 t/yr in throughput)
Facilities for manufacturing new building materials from	Akitawood Co., Ltd.	◆Mixes waste plastic with waste wood to produce energy-efficient construction materials by extrusion molding.
Coal ash and waste plastic recycling facilities	Akita Eco Plash Co., Ltd.	◆By using wastes such as plastic containers and packaging, produces secondary plastic products (materials for electrical facilities and construction materials)

Source : Ministry of the Environment

Figure 4-3-15 Material flow of waterfront area

Source: National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan
Figure 4-3-16 Kitakyushu City’s efforts

Source: Documents provided by the Central Environmental Council

## C Kitakyushu City

Based on its experience in overcoming serious pollution problems, and having already implemented Eco-towns and other projects for the establishment of a SMC, Kitakyushu City has been cooperating with other Asian regions on environmental issues. In an effort to construct a mechanism for international resource circulation, the city is conducting a field trial for waste tracking using IC tags. In this trial, waste circuit boards are imported from Asian countries for advanced recycling, while waste plastics are exported back to those areas. The city is also acting as a center for international resource circulation in other ways, considering such things as the inclusion of safe and secure gateway functions in its Eco-town and port, including inspection and formality execution and the certification capability needed for traceability information management (Figure4-3-16) (Table 4-3-1).

## Section3 Implementing more effective measures

## (1) Organic combination of institutional frameworks and support measures

The optimal size of a SMC block depends on the properties of the CRs involved. Therefore, when establishing a SMC block (with appropriate waste management as a precondition), the government will determine the optimal size for each type of CR by considering regional characteristics (e.g., the state of waste generation, the location of relevant treatment facilities) from an environmental perspective (e.g., anti-global warming, biodiversity conservation), a resource perspective (e.g., scarcity, utility), and an economic perspective (e.g., transport efficiency, treatment costs). On the other hand, the government will also follow the procedures described below in establishing SMC blocks whose optimal size is already fairly obvious. These include SMC blocks for biomass CRs, for which intraregional circulation is suitable because biomass is generated in specific regions and decomposes easily, and those for CRs requiring advanced treatment technology, for which wide-area circulation is more desirable.
Figure 4-3-17 Biomass town vision

○ A biomass town is an area in which a total local biomass utilization system is established through joint efforts by a variety of local entities, efficiently connecting every biomass-related process, from generation to utilization, and in which biomass is, or is expected to be, steadily and appropriately used.

Figure 4-3-18 Subsidy program to support circulative resource handling (other facilities expenses)

FY 2006: Outlaid as part of 800 million yen government expenditures

FY 2007: Outlaid as part of 1 billion yen government expenditures

• Eligible entities: Any legal person which a local government invests in or finances (e.g., third-sector companies)

• Rate of assistance by subsidies: One third of the total project costs in any region

• Eligible projects

• Projects which construct facilities to warehouse or store circulative resources in order to facilitate the efficient handling of CRs at ports designated as recycling ports.

Source: Documents provided by the Central Environmental Council

recycling laws and the Law for the Promotion of Effective Utilities of Resources, with a view towards wider-area circulation. The wide-area certification and recycling certification programs under the Waste Management Law will also be appropriately used for these CRs. Through inter-industry collaborations, the multi-stage recycling of CRs will be fostered by further restricting the resource input into supply chains and by promoting the wide-area use of
# Promoting the collection of mobile handsets

With the appearance of lighter, cheaper and more capable handsets, mobile phones are now so common that over 100 million people use them in Japan. Since mobile handsets contain gold, silver copper and rare metals such as palladium at concentrations higher than those found in natural ores (see “Valuable metals contained in mobile and PHS handsets”), they need to be appropriately recycled and disposed of from the viewpoint of effectively using resources.

For this reason, a voluntary collection and recycling system has been established by mobile and PHS carriers (the Mobile Recycling Network) in order to promote recycling (see “Changes in collected mobile handsets in number and weight”).

However, the number of handsets collected has actually been declining over the years. Approximately 6.6 million units were collected in FY 2006, while about 50 million units were shipped to the domestic market in the same fiscal year. The factors behind this can be observed in the results of a consumer questionnaire. When asked about the reasons for keeping their old handsets, most respondents cited their desire to keep the phone as part of their personal collection or for sentimental reasons, while others answered that they still use their handset for purposes other than making telephone calls. On the other hand, 22.0% of respondents (a smaller percentage than in the previous fiscal year) cited no specific reasons, suggesting that many people hold onto their mobile phones for no valid reason. The percentages for those who did not know how to dispose of the handset (9.9%) and those who were too lazy to bring it to a store (5.9%) were also high. There is a need to publicize the collection system to consumers and enhance the current collection structure (see "Factors behind the reduction in the number of mobile handsets collected).

Valuable metals contained in mobile and PHS handsets

Type of mineral	Valuable metals contained in mobile and PHS handsets	Reference: Average content in ore
Gold (g/t)	400	0.92
Silver (g/t)	2,300	93
Copper (%)	17.2	1.2
Palladium (g/t)	100	181

Source: Created by the Ministry of the Environment, based on the FY 2001 Annual Report for Establishing a Sound Material-Cycle Society and issued by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry

Changes in collected mobile handsets, by number and weight by fiscal year

Before MRN	After the Mobile Recycling Network
FY 2000	FY 2001	FY 2002	FY 2003	FY 2004	FY 2005	FY 2006
Collected bodies	Number in 1,000 units	13,615	13,107	11,369	11,717	8,528	7,444	6,622
Weight in tons	819	799	746	821	677	622	558
Collected batteries	Number in 1,000 units	11,847	11,788	9,727	10,247	7,312	6,575	6,133
Weight in tons	304	264	193	187	159	132	125
Collected battery chargers	Number in 1,000 units	3,128	4,231	3,355	4,387	3,181	3,587	3,475
Weight in tons	328	361	251	319	288	259	234

Source: TCA and CIAJ

Factors behind the reduction in the number of mobile handsets collected
research institutes, central and local governments and NGOs/NPOs, to foster people-to-people exchanges as well as information exchange. In particular, the development of coordinators will be promoted through the nurturing of young researchers at universities, through the transmission of technologies in industries and universities from one generation to the next, and through people-to-people exchanges between NGOs/NPOs. In addition, the government will foster improvements in the capabilities of leaders, including central and local government officials and teachers engaged in environmental education and learning, by expanding their training programs.

As mentioned in Chapter 2, a prerequisite to the establishment of SMC blocks is that every entity involved plays its part through cooperation and collaboration with all others (linking ability). In particular, in order to strengthen such collaboration, local governments play a key role in promoting the establishment of regional SMCs and are expected to act as an essential coordinator between different entities. For example, they are expected to foster cooperation between companies from different sectors and provide a framework for their collaboration. To be more specific, the prefectural government should take the lead in aligning the efforts of the municipal governments and other entities involved, approaching the issues from a broad perspective. The municipal government should play its role as the fundamental governing body closely related to citizens' lives by carrying out activities such as the construction of a local circulation system. At the same time, the prefectural and municipal governments all need to work in close cooperation.

There are many kinds of information to sive the base of each entity’s efforts: domestic material flows, the amounts of different types of waste generated, the cyclical use and disposal of different types of waste, future prospects, technical data on wastes (e.g., materials, composition, design), and the environmental effects of the use and disposal of wastes. It is essential that a system to gather all this statistical information be immediately reviewed and improved so that accurate information can be obtained swiftly.
Confirmation of the significance of collaboration for capacity development in developing countries

37. The importance of technical and financial support toward capacity development for the 3Rs in developing countries, building on existing frameworks, was observed. It was also observed that there is a need for improved coordination of international assistance related with the 3Rs and better synchronization of development agencies' activities in this field were called for. Furthermore, it was noted that effective capacity development requires a multi-stakeholder approach, involving the private sector, local governments and NGOs.

## Agreement on Kobe 3R Action Plan

38. G8 Ministers agreed on the Kobe 3R Action Plan and to report the progress in 2011. Finally, Japan observed that it has launched its “New Action Plan towards a Global Zero Waste Society,” which it hopes will stimulate further international co-operation in the spirit of the Kobe 3R Action Plan.
designation and management of protected areas, taking into account the situation of respective countries and existing international designations such as UNESCO's Man and the Biosphere Programme, the Ramsar Convention and the World Heritage Convention and integrate into networks of globally important ecosystems for biodiversity conservation, including forests, wetlands and marine and coastal areas, such as coral reefs.

9. Enhance the implementation of the Programme of Work on Protected Areas under the Convention on Biological Diversity by, where appropriate, supporting initiatives such as Germany’s voluntary Life Web Initiative.

10. Welcome the International Year of the Reef: 2008 in this context as a means to raise awareness of the vital environmental and economic importance of coral reef ecosystems to people worldwide and to promote improved coral reef conservation.

## Private sector engagement

11. Strengthen global initiatives and fora promoting dialogue, cooperation and joint activities among various stakeholders including the business sector, NGOs and researchers, such as the World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the Global Biodiversity Forum.

12. Work to mainstream the concept of biodiversity in society through, where appropriate, developing partnership with the private sector and extending exchanges of information about successful experiences and practice.

13. Encourage corporate social responsibility, with a view to making the private sector a full partner in biodiversity conservation, and promote enabling environments for private investment in sustainable management of biodiversity.

## Strengthening scientific capabilities for monitoring of biodiversity

14. Further promote international collaboration in research, monitoring, assessment and information sharing of biodiversity in particular by strengthening cooperation among existing organizations focused on research and monitoring of natural systems, including through the use of remote sensing and ground observation so that impacts of climate change can also be monitored.
The cover picture depicts a Japanese crested ibis taking flight from a furoshiki that has an Earth design. The picture reflects our hope for creating a low carbon society, a sound material-cycle society, and a society in harmony with nature, and our determination to care for the global environment.

## Furoshiki

Furoshiki is a stylish, reusable, traditional Japanese cloth which is used to wrap clothes, gifts, or other goods. It is a symbol of waste reduction for Japanese culture.

## Toki

The Japanese crested ibis (Toki, Nipponia nippon) is a bird that was commonly sighted throughout Japan during the Edo era. However, excessive hunting of wild ibises during the Meiji era led to their drastic decline, and they finally became extinct in the wild in 1981. Currently, breeding of ibises which were given by China, is ongoing, and the reintroduction project is underway.

If you have any opinions and comments regarding this booklet, please contact the following.

## Overview 1

Environmental Strategy Division

Environmental Policy Bureau

Ministry of the Environment

Tel: +81-3-3581-3351(ex.6254) E-mail: hakusho@env.ne.jp

## Overview 2

Office of Sound Material-Cycle Society

Policy Planning Division

Waste Management and Recycling Department

Minister's Secretariat

Ministry of the Environment

Tel: +81-3-3581-3351(ex.6819) E-mail: junkan@env.ne.jp

Annual Report on the Environment and the Sound Material-Cycle Society in Japan 2008

Published by: Ministry of the Environment

Translated by: Ministry of the Environment

Published in June 2008
平 成 2 5 年度 誠 出 概 算 要 求 額 明 細 表19 内 閣 府 所 管(政策統括官(防災担当))
要求番号	事項	前 年 度 額	2 5 年 度 概 算 要 求 額	对 前 年 度 比 較 增 △ 减	備 考
1	010 内 閣 本 府	3,988,371	5,330,377	1,342,006
010 内 閣 本 府 共 通 費	76,796	1,376,737	1,299,941
01-95 内閣本府一般行政必要	66,336	1,365,369	1,299,033
031 合同庁含第8号館移転に	0	1,298,403	1,298,403
必要な経費
010 合同庁含第8号館移転に	0	1,285,611	1,285,611
伴う中央防災無線網設備	0	1,285,611	1,285,611
整備経費
95016-2123-09-4180 移 転 費
内(本) 5

要求番号	事項	前年度算額	25年度概算要求額	对前年度比較增△減	備考
191 政策統括官(防災担当)一般事務処理に要する経費	66,336	66,966	630	19年度	20年度	21年度	22年度	23年度
予算額	(67,891)(67,891	65,496)(65,496	63,380)(63,380	61,490)(61,490	51,853)51,853
(要求要旨)「内閣府設置法」第4条第1項第7号に基づく、災害予防、災害应急対策、災害復旧及び災害からの復興に関する基本的な政策に関する事項の企画及び立案並びに総合調整に関する事務を行う。
95016-2129-06-0110 諸 謝 金	620	1,875	1,255	1.災害発生後等に明らかとなった課題対応検討会出席謝金
大学教授級	(11)(1)	(8,100)@,200	2時間	1,440(162)	178)
2.防災週間行事費	162(32)
防災フェア	2人	@,100	2時間	32(130)
防災ポスターコンクール	8人	@,100	2回	1時間
3.競争入札技術審査委員謝金	1人	8回	@,100	1時間	65(65)
4.火山防災エキスパート謝金	208(215)
大学教授級	(1)	(8,100)@,200	2時間	115(65)
民間人・役員クラス	1人	4回	@1,600	2時間	93(93)
前年度限りの経費	0(57)
計	1,875(620)
95016-2122-08-2010 職 員 旅 費	4,746	5,126	380	1.防災担当大臣等会議出席旅費	1,216(315)
国務大臣等(全国、日帰り)
(45,560)(1)	367(91)
2人	@45,880	4回
指定職	(全国、日帰り)
(2)
1人	@45,580	4回	182(91)
10級～7級(全国、日帰り)
(1)
2人	@33,600	4回	269(67)
6級～3級(全国、日帰り)
(1)
3人	@33,200	4回	398(66)
2.中央防災無線網の整備旅費	115(115)
6 内(本)

要求番号	事項	前年度算額	25年度概算要求額	对前年度比較增△減	備考
6級～3級(プロック、日帰り)2人@4,880 3回6級～3級(立川市、日帰り)1人@2,150 12回3被災者生活再建支援法施行状况等調查旅費10級～7級(全国、1泊)1人@48,000 2回6級～3級(全国、1泊)1人@45,200 6回4立川防災合同庁舍管理点検等旅費指定職(立川市、日帰り)2人@2,350 1回10級～7級(立川市、日帰り)5人@2,250 1回6級～3級(立川市、日帰り)1人@2,150 15回5東京湾臨海部基幹的広域防災拠点管理点検等旅費10級～7級(川崎市、日帰り)1人@1,950 1回6級～3級(川崎市、日帰り)2人@1,850 1回6防災週間·防災教育等意識啓発事業実施旅費10級～7級(全国、1泊)1人@48,000 2回6級～3級(全国、1泊)1人@45,200 3回7防災ボランティア関連施策実施等旅費10級～7級(全国、1泊)1人@48,000 1回6級～3級(全国、1泊)3人@45,200 1回8風水害·土砂災害·雪害対策推進調査旅費6級～3級(全国、1泊)1人@45,200 2回9防災に関する人材育成·活用実施旅費76(82)
要求番号	事項	前年度算額	2.5年度概算要求額	对前年度比較增△減	備考
6級～3級(神戸市、日帰り)1人@1,060 2回6級～3級(県内、日帰り)(3)3人@2,250 2回10災害時要援護者の支援対策調査旅費6級～3級(全国、1泊)1人@45,200 2回11人と防災未来センターの運営予算執行状況調査6級～3級(神戸市、1泊)1人@44,160 1回12アジア防災センターにおける多国間防災協力推進調査旅費10級～7級(神戸市、1泊)1人@47,160 3回6級～3級(神戸市、1泊)1人@44,160 3回13国際防災協力に係る課題の調査検討及び会議旅費6級～3級(神戸市、1泊)(5)1人@44,160 4回14復興対策の推進調査等旅費10級～7級(全国、1泊)1人@48,000 2回15災害の被害認定基準等の適正な運用の確保に要する経費6級～3級(全国、日帰り)1人@33,200 3回16地震防災紧急事業五箇年計画等推進調査旅費6級～3級(全国、1泊)(7)1人@45,200 5回17京阪神都市圈広域防災拠点整備調査旅費6級～3級(大阪、日帰り)1人@30,020 2回18津波対策の推進調査旅費10級～7級(全国、1泊)1人@48,000 2回	62(62)20)90)44)273)141)132)177)96)100)100)316)60)384)96)
8 内(本)

要求
番号	事項	前年
算
額	2.5年度
概算要求額	对前年度比較增△減	備
考
6級～3級(全国、1泊)
1人@45,200 2回
6級～3級(プロック、1泊)
2人@6,880 2回
前年度限りの経費
1.9火山災害対策推進調査旅費
6級～3級(全国、1泊)
1人@45,200 3回
2.0総合防災情報システム整備調査旅費
6級～3級(全国、1泊)
2人@45,200 2回
2.1大規模水害対策の推進経費
6級～3級(栗橋町、日帰り)
(2,770)(15)
1人@45,200 2回
2.2住宅・建物等における地震防災対策の推進調査旅費
6級～3級(全国、1泊)
2人@45,200 2回
2.3地震対策の基礎調査に要する経費
6級～3級(全国、1泊)
2人@45,200 2回
2.4地震対策の策定に要する経費
6級～3級(全国、1泊)
2人@45,200 2回
2.5応急対策活動の具体計画策定等調査検討に要する経費
6級～3級(全国、1泊)
2人@45,200 2回
2.6防災計画の推進
6級～3級(全国、1泊)
2人@45,200 2回
2.7首都機能のバックアップ機能強化に要する経費
6級～3級(大阪、日帰り)
2人@30,020 2回
2.8前年度限りの経費
計
1.人と防災未来センター災害対策専門研修(春季、秋季)
1,268(1,268)
内(本) 9

要求番号	事項	前年度算額	2.5年度概算要求額	对前年度比較增△減	備考
6級～3級相当(神戸市、3泊)6人 @0,360 2回 0.82級相当(神戸市、3泊)6人 @1,760 2回 0.82.被災者生活再建支援法関連調査経費6級～3級相当(全国、1泊)(1)2人 @45,200 4回3.立川広域防災基地の見学及び防災教育研修等6級～3級相当(立川市、日帰り)(1)5人 @2,150 1回 0.82級相当(立川市、日帰り)(1)2人 @2,025 4回 0.84.防災週間・防災教育等意識啓発事業実施旅費防災功労者表彰総理表彰(1級相当、全国、日帰り)20人 @2,700大臣表彰(1級相当、全国、日帰り)20人 @2,7005.アジア防災センターにおける多国間防災協力推進調査旅費6級～3級相当(神戸市、1泊)2人 @44,160 4回 0.8283(2)日米防災政策会議出席旅費(ワシントン、5泊7日)6級～3級相当1人 @638,900 1回639(7.競争入札技術審査委員旅費10級～7級相当(プロック、日帰り)1人 @15,280 10回8.火山防災エキスパート派遣旅費	675(675)593(593)181)27)9(11)16)1,308)1,308)654)654)654)61)61)639)153)153)467)
10 内(本)

要求
番号	事項	前
年
算
額	2
5
年
度
概算
算
求
額	对
前
年
度
比
較
增
△
减	備
考
95016-2123-09-1010
庁
費	56,576	53,383	△	3,193	1 0 級 ~ 7 級相当(全国、日帰り)
(2)
4人 @3,600 4回 0.8
6 級 ~ 3 級相当(全国、日帰り)
(3)
1人 @3,200 4回 0.8
9. 災害発生後等に明らかになった課題対応検討会出席旅費
1 0 級 ~ 7 級相当(全国、日帰り)
(2)
5人 @3,600 10回 0.8
1 0 級 ~ 7 級相当(プロック、日帰り)
5人 @15,280 10回 0.8
計
4. 賃金
事務補助員
继続
新規
5. 保険料
(425,071)
3人 @96,760
6. 児童手当拠出金
(4,061)
3人 @4,257
計	1 0 級 ~ 7 級相当(全国、日帰り)
(2)
4人 @3,600 4回 0.8
6 級 ~ 3 級相当(全国、日帰り)
(3)
1人 @3,200 4回 0.8
9. 災害発生後等に明らかになった課題対応検討会出席旅費
1 0 級 ~ 7 級相当(全国、日帰り)
(2)
5人 @3,600 10回 0.8
1 0 級 ~ 7 級相当(プロック、日帰り)
5人 @15,280 10回 0.8
6,582(4,394)
52,180(55,289)
43,528(46,149)
8,652(9,140)
1,190(1,275)
13(12)
53,383(56,576)
要求番号	事項	前年度算額	25年度概算要求額	对前年度比較增△減	備考
2	06-95 重要政策に関する会議等に必要な経費	10,460	11,368	908	19年度	20年度	21年度	22年度	23年度
701 中央防災会議開催等に要する経費	予算額	(13,488)(13,488	(10,695)(10,695	(9,956)(9,956	(10,966)(10,966	(16,243)(16,243
(要求要旨)	「災害対策基本法」に基づき、防災基本計画及び非常災害に際しての緊急措置に関する計画を作成し、これらの計画の実施を推進するとともに防災に関する重要事項を審議し、また、専門の事項を調査させるため、専門調査会を設置し審議する。
95016-2111-05-0200 委員手当	5,062	5,062	0	1 中央防災会議委員	4人日 @1,500 4回	504(	504)
2 専門調査会委員	19人日 @20,100 6回	0.7	1,604(	1,604)
3 ワーキンググループ委員	15人日 @20,100 6回	0.7	1,266(	1,266)
4 検討会委員	20人日 @20,100 6回	0.7	1,688(	1,688)
計	1 専門調査会出席謝金	5,062(	5,062)
95016-2129-06-0110 諸 謝 金	302	1,210	908	1 専門調査会出席謝金
大学教授級
10人日 @200 2時間 12回 0.7	1,210(	0)
前年度限りの経費	0(	302)
計	1 中央防災会議委員等旅費	302)
95016-2122-08-6010 委員等旅費	3,792	3,792	0	1 中央防災会議委員等旅費
指定職相当 (全国、日帰り)
1人 @45,580 4回	182(	182)
2 専門調査会委員等旅費	1,215(	1,215)
委員 (全国,日帰り)	7人 @3,600 6回	0.7	988(	988)
委員 (プロック内,日帰り)	2人 @5,280 6回	0.7	128(	128)
委員 (県内,日帰り)	10人 @2,350 6回	0.7	99(	99)
3 ワーキンググループ委員等旅費	885(	885)
委員 (全国,日帰り)	4人 @3,600 6回	0.7	564(	564)
委員 (プロック内,日帰り)	5人 @15,280 6回	0.7	321(	321)
4 検討会委員等旅費	1,510(	1,510)
委員 (全国,日帰り)	10人 @3,600 6回	0.7	1,411(	1,411)
12 内(本)

要求
番号	事 项	前
年
算
额	2 5 年 度
概算要 求 额	对 前 年 度
比較增△ 减	備 考
95016-2123-09-1010 庁 費	1,304	1,304	0	委員 (県内,日帰り) 計 1. 会議費 (茶菓代) (1)中央防災会議 (2)専門調査会 (3)ワーキンググループ (4)検討会 2.雑役務費 (速記料) (1)中央防災会議 (2)専門調査会 (3)ワーキンググループ (4)検討会 計	10人 @2,350 6回 0.7	99(3,792)157(44)40(33)40(1,147)88(265)397(397)1,304(1,304)	99)3,792)157)44)40)33)40)1,147)88)265)397)1,304(1,304)
内(本) 13

要求番号	事項	前年度算額	25年度概算要求額	对前年度比較增△減	備考
14 内(本)

要求番号	事項	前年度算額	25年度概算要求額	对前年度比較增△減	備考
026 災害対策本部予備施設の外装修繕に要する経費	19年度	20年度	21年度	22年度	23年度
0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
内(本) 15

要求番号	事項	前年度算額	25年度概算要求額	对前年度比較增△減	備考
4	068 防災政策費	19年度	20年度	21年度	22年度	23年度
01-95 防災基本政策の企画立案等に必要な経費	3,633,011	3,605,128	27,883	(10,152,454)(4,043,875	4,184,383)(4,233,063	4,181,883)(4,181,883	4,015,383)(4,015,383	374,198,383)4,020,374
001 防災に関する普及・啓発に必要な経費	366,001	550,407	184,406	(101,524,454)(4,043,875	4,184,383)(4,233,063	4,181,883)(4,181,883	4,015,383)(4,015,383	374,198,383)4,020,374
001 防災週間・防災教育等意識啓発事業経費	(19年度	20年度	21年度	22年度	23年度
(19年度	20年度	21年度	22年度	23年度
(19
16 内(本)

要求
番号	事項	前
年
算
額	2
5
年
度
概算
算
求
額	对
前
年
度
比
較
增
△
减	備
考
技師(A)	(20)	(38,900)	1,540(778)
技師(B)	(30)	(31,600)	948)
技師(C)	(30)	(26,200)	1,565(786)
技術員	(30)	(22,700)	1,332(681)
(イ)直接經費	(21,294)	(22,200)	4,805)
①謝金
シンポジウム出席(大学教授クラス)
(2)	(8,100)	259(194)
②旅費
シンポジウム出席旅費(10-7級、日帰り)	323(323)
県内	3人	3回	21(21)
全国平均	3人	3回	302(302)
③印刷製本費	781(557)
パンフレット(A4カラー両面)
(2)	(2)	3回	40,000枚@360(240)
報告書(A4、カラー100頁)
(200)	(547)
400部	@1,052	421(109)
前年度限10の経費	0(208)
④通信運搬費
ポスター・パンフレット	(2)	(300)	(1,300)
⑤雑役務費	315(780)
パネル作成費	(10)	(20,000)	4,752(902)
パネル作成費	60枚	@1,000	540(200)
プース設置費	(2)	(15か所)	4,212(702)
⑥会場借料	3回	60箇所	4,212(702)
イベント	(3)	(450,000)	7,600(1,350)
4日	@1,900,000
内(本) 17

要求番号	事項	前年度額	25年度概算要求額	对前年度比較增△減	備考
⑦賃金	7,264(	699)
当日スタッフ	(3)	(12)	(9,188)
4日	@105名	@8,647	3,632(
設営スタッフ	(4)	(10)	(9,188)
6日	@70名	@8,647	3,632(
(5)	(3,646)	(3,646)	6,971(
(6)	(12,097)	(12,097)	6,971(
(7)	(35,236千円	0.05	1,762(
(8)	(2)	(2)	(2)
(9)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(10)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(11)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(12)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(13)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(14)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(15)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(16)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(17)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(18)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(19)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(20)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(21)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(22)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(23)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(24)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(25)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(26)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(27)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(28)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(29)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(30)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(31)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(32)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(33)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(34)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(35)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(36)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(37)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(38)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(39)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(40)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(41)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(42)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(43)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(44)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(45)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(46)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(47)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(48)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(49)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(50)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(51)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(52)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(53)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(54)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(55)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(56)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(57)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(58)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(59)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(60)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(61)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)
(62)	(12,097)	(12,097)	(12,097)