Silviase/jgov_v1.4_full_ann huggingface dataset:
Month/year	Major Developments in Japanese Aid	Month/year	International Developments in Aid
8	In response to the droughts in the "Horn of Africa" region, emergency relief goods were dispatched to refugee camps in Kenya, Ethiopia.	8	The 10th International Congress on AIDS in Asia and the Pacific was held (in Busan, Republic of Korea).
8	In response to the fire accident at a petroleum refining plant in the Khabarovsk region, Russia, a Japan Disaster Relief Team (a team of experts) was dispatched.
8	Emergency grant aid was provided for the presidential election in Kyrgyz.
8	It was decided to establish the "Committee for Proper Development Assistance."
9	In response to the droughts in the "Horn of Africa" region, emergency relief goods were dispatched to refugee camps in Ethiopia.	9	The Pacific Islands (PIF) Post-Forum Dialogue was held (in Auckland, New Zealand).
9	In response to the famine in the "Horn of Africa" region, food aid was extended (the statement made by the Prime Minister Noda at the UN General Assembly).	9	The 2nd Meeting of States Parties to the Convention on Cluster Munitions was held (in Beirut, Lebanon).
9	In response to the flood disaster in Pakistan, emergency relief goods and emergency grant aid were provided.	9	The United Nations High-Level Meeting on Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases (NCDs) was held (in New York).
9	Emergency grant aid was provided for the people injured by the armed conflicts in Libya.	9	The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) Side Event was held (in New York).
10	In response to the flood disaster in Cambodia, emergency relief goods were provided.
10—11	In response to the flood disaster in Thailand, emergency relief goods and a Japan Disaster Relief Team (a team of experts) were dispatched, and emergency grand aid was provided.	10	The G20 Ministerial Meeting on Development was held (in Washington DC).
10	In response to the severe water shortage in Tuvalu, emergency relief goods were provided.	10	A seminar on disaster risk reduction, co-sponsored by Japan, World Bank, and others, was held (in Washington, DC).
10—11	In response to the heavy rain disaster in El Salvador, emergency relief goods were provided.
10	In response to the heavy rain disaster in Honduras, emergency relief goods were provided.
10	In response to the earthquake disaster in Turkey, emergency relief goods and emergency grant aid were provided.
10	In response to the heavy rain disaster in Nicaragua, emergency relief goods were provided.
10	In response to the flood disaster in Myanmar, emergency relief goods were provided.
10	In response to the flood disaster in Viet Nam, emergency relief goods were provided.
11	The 3rd Mekong-Japan Summit Meeting was held (in Bali, Indonesia).	11	The G20 Cannes Summit was held (in Cannes).
11	11	11	The 4th High-Level Forum of Aid Effectiveness was held (in Busan, Republic of Korea).
11—12	11—12	11—12	The 17th Conference of the Parties (COP17) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was held (in Durban, South Africa).
12	In response to the typhoon disaster in the Republic of the Philippines, emergency relief goods and emergency grant aid were provided.
# Other Countries' ODA Disbursements

## Section 1 DAC Countries' ODA Disbursements

## Chart IV-26 DAC Countries' ODA Disbursements (2010)

(Units: US$ million)

Country	Net disbursement basis	Gross disbursement basis
Rank	Disbursements	Change from the previous year (%)	Rank	Disbursements	Share (%)	Change from the previous year (%)
United States	1	30,353	5.3	1	31,159	22.1	5.1
United Kingdom	2	13,053	15.7	5	13,401	9.5	16.6
Germany	3	12,985	7.5	3	14,386	10.2	7.8
France	4	12,915	2.5	4	14,375	10.2	1.9
Japan	5	11,021	16.4	2	18,828	13.3	14.5
Netherlands	6	6,357	-1.1	6	6,468	4.6	-1.8
Spain	7	5,949	-9.6	7	6,317	4.5	-9.6
Canada	8	5,202	30.0	8	5,245	3.7	29.8
Norway	9	4,580	12.2	9	4,580	3.2	12.2
Sweden	10	4,533	-0.3	10	4,541	3.2	-0.2
Australia	11	3,826	38.5	11	3,826	2.7	38.5
Belgium	12	3,004	15.1	13	3,052	2.2	13.5
Italy	13	2,996	-9.1	12	3,180	2.3	-8.5
Denmark	14	2,871	2.2	14	2,976	2.1	4.6
Switzerland	15	2,300	-0.4	15	2,316	1.6	-0.2
Finland	16	1,333	3.3	16	1,333	0.9	3.3
Austria	17	1,208	5.8	17	1,214	0.9	5.2
Republic of Korea	18	1,174	43.8	18	1,206	0.9	41.8
Ireland	19	895	-11.0	19	895	0.6	-11.0
Portugal	20	649	26.6	20	685	0.5	24.9
Greece	21	508	-16.4	21	508	0.4	-16.4
Luxembourg	22	403	-2.9	22	403	0.3	-2.9
New Zealand	23	342	10.7	23	342	0.2	10.7
DAC Countries Total	128,459	7.2	141,236	100.0	7.3

Source: DAC Press Release, DAC statistics on OECD.STAT

$ ^{*} $ 1 Countries are listed in descending order in terms of net ODA disbursements.

$ ^{*} $ 2 Excludes assistance to Eastern Europe and graduated countries.

$ ^{*} $ 3 Numbers may not add up to the total due to rounding.
(Net disbursement basis, Units: US$ million)

Rank	Country	ODA total	Bilateral ODA	Contributions to multilateral institutions
Total	Grant aid	Technical cooperation	Loan aid
1	United States	28,831	25,174	25,225	767	-819	3,658
2	France	12,602	7,187	3,362	2,618	1,207	5,415
3	Germany	12,079	7,097	2,230	4,516	350	4,983
4	United Kingdom	11,283	7,392	6,414	632	346	3,891
5	Japan	9,467	6,176	3,193	2,300	684	3,290
6	Spain	6,584	4,473	3,167	931	375	2,111
7	Netherlands	6,426	4,798	4,626	331	-159	1,628
8	Sweden	4,548	3,009	2,787	136	86	1,539
9	Norway	4,081	3,164	2,666	454	43	918
10	Canada	4,000	3,141	1,403	1,779	-41	859
11	Italy	3,297	875	781	90	4	2,423
12	Denmark	2,810	1,905	1,801	113	-8	904
13	Australia	2,762	2,312	1,093	1,131	88	450
14	Belgium	2,610	1,585	1,113	511	-39	1,025
15	Switzerland	2,310	1,751	1,558	176	16	559
16	Finland	1,290	791	460	305	26	499
17	Austria	1,142	507	315	201	-9	635
18	Ireland	1,006	693	679	14	-	313
19	Republic of Korea	816	581	224	143	214	235
20	Greece	607	297	108	189	-	310
21	Portugal	513	277	81	144	52	236
22	Luxembourg	415	266	259	7	-	149
23	New Zealand	309	226	174	52	-	83
DAC total	119,787	83,675	63,716	17,542	2,416	36,113
DAC average	5,208	3,638	2,770	763	105	1,570

Source: DAC statistics on OECD.STAT

$ ^{*} $ 1 Countries are listed in descending order in terms of net ODA disbursements.

$ ^{*} $ 2 Grant aid includes administrative costs, promotion of development awareness, grants for supporting NGOs, and debt relief.

$ ^{*} $ 3 Numbers may not add up to the total due to rounding.

$ ^{*} $ 4 Excludes assistance to Eastern Europe and graduated countries.
Chart IV-28 Share of Disbursements by Major DAC Countries by Region (2009)

Middle East and North Africa

Sub-Saharan Africa

Latin America and the Caribbean

Source: DAC Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows

$ ^{*} $ 1 Gross disbursement basis

$ ^{*} $ 2 Based on the regional classification of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

$ ^{*} $ 3 Excludes assistance to Eastern Europe and graduated countries.

$ ^{*} $ 4 Figures in the middle of the charts are the total disbursements by DAC countries.
(Commitment basis, average of two years, Units: %)

Country	Rank	2008/2009	Rank	2007/2008
Canada	1	100.0	1	100.0
Greece	1	100.0	1	100.0
Ireland	1	100.0	1	100.0
Luxembourg	1	100.0	1	100.0
Netherlands	1	100.0	1	100.0
New Zealand	1	100.0	1	100.0
United States	7	100.0	7	100.0
Austria	8	99.4	9	99.6
Switzerland	9	99.2	10	98.8
Denmark	10	98.9	13	98.2
Australia	11	98.8	8	99.9
Sweden	12	98.5	12	98.4
Belgium	13	98.4	11	98.5
Finland	14	97.4	14	96.1
Norway	15	96.3	15	95.9
United Kingdom	16	95.0	16	93.1
Italy	17	93.5	17	93.1
Portugal	18	87.0	19	84.8
Spain	19	85.2	18	85.5
Germany	20	84.0	20	83.8
France	21	73.2	21	79.1
Japan	22	47.2	22	43.4
Republic of Korea	23	44.0	n.a.
DAC average	86.9	88.0

Source: DAC Development Co-operation Report

$ ^{*} $ 1 Countries are listed in descending order in terms of grant share of ODA in 2007/2008 average.

$ ^{*} $ 2 Excludes debt relief.

Chart IV-30 Grant Amounts of DAC Countries

(Disbursements as grant, average of two years, Units: US$ million)
Country	Rank	2008/2009	Rank	2007/2008
United States	1	28,535	1	25,018
Germany	2	13,020	2	13,371
United Kingdom	3	11,067	3	11,011
France	4	10,486	4	10,384
Japan	5	9,662	5	9,221
Netherlands	6	6,931	6	6,948
Spain	7	6,525	7	5,950
Sweden	8	4,570	9	4,473
Canada	9	4,437	8	4,477
Italy	10	4,118	10	4,447
Norway	11	3,953	11	3,669
Denmark	12	2,823	13	2,731
Australia	13	2,787	12	2,783
Belgium	14	2,560	14	2,233
Switzerland	15	2,159	15	1,848
Austria	16	1,455	16	1,798
Finland	17	1,209	18	1,063
Ireland	18	1,167	17	1,260
Greece	19	655	19	602
Republic of Korea	20	617	20	598
Portugal	21	473	21	468
Luxembourg	22	415	22	395
New Zealand	23	329	23	334
Total	119,951	115,080

Source: DAC statistics on OECD.STAT

* Countries are listed in descending order of their grant amounts.
Chart IV-31 Grant Element of DAC Countries

Country	Rank	2008/2009	Rank	2007/2008
Austria	1	100.0	1	100.0
Canada	1	100.0	1	100.0
Denmark	1	100.0	1	100.0
Greece	1	100.0	1	100.0
Ireland	1	100.0	1	100.0
Luxembourg	1	100.0	1	100.0
Netherlands	1	100.0	1	100.0
New Zealand	1	100.0	1	100.0
Norway	1	100.0	1	100.0
Switzerland	1	100.0	1	100.0
United Kingdom	1	100.0	1	100.0
United States	1	100.0	1	100.0
Finland	13	100.0	14	100.0
Sweden	14	99.9	15	99.8
Belgium	15	99.7	16	99.7
Australia	16	99.6	13	100.0
Italy	17	98.9	17	99.0
Portugal	18	96.4	22	81.8
Spain	19	95.9	18	95.0
Germany	20	92.7	19	93.5
Republic of Korea	21	89.8	n.a.
France	22	89.4	20	91.0
Japan	23	85.8	21	85.5
DAC average	96.1	96.4

Source: DAC Development Co-operation Report

$ ^{*} $ 1 Countries are listed in descending order in terms of grant element of ODA in 2008/2009 average.

$ ^{*} $ 2 Excludes debt relief.

*3 Grant element (GE): Index showing the concessionality on the terms of a loan; With loans on commercial terms (interest rate assumed at 10%) as 0% of G.E., the G.E. percentage rises as terms (interest rate, repayment period, and deferment period) are eased and reaches 100% in the case of grants.

Chart IV-32 Tying Status of Bilateral ODA of DAC Countries

(Commitment basis, Units: %)

Country	Untied $ ^{*1} $	Partially Untied	Tied $ ^{*2} $
2009	2008	2009	2008	2009	2008
Ireland	100.0	100.0	—	—	—	—
Luxembourg	100.0	100.0	—	—	—	—
United Kingdom	100.0	100.0	—	—	—	—
Norway	100.0	100.0	—	—	0.0	0.0
Sweden	99.9	99.9	—	—	0.1	0.1
Switzerland	99.2	97.3	—	—	0.8	2.7
Canada	98.3	90.8	0.0	1.3	1.7	7.8
Germany	97.1	98.2	—	—	2.9	1.8
Denmark	96.6	98.5	—	—	3.4	1.5
Belgium	95.5	91.9	—	—	4.5	8.1
Japan	94.8	96.5	—	—	5.2	3.5
Australia	90.8	96.7	—	—	9.2	3.3
Finland	90.3	92.3	—	—	9.7	7.7
New Zealand	90.1	92.7	—	0.0	9.9	7.3
France	89.5	81.9	—	—	10.5	18.1
Netherlands	80.8	93.2	—	—	19.2	6.8
Spain	76.6	69.1	3.7	1.2	19.7	29.7
United States	69.8	74.7	—	—	30.2	25.3
Italy	56.2	78.0	0.5	1.7	43.2	20.3
Austria	55.2	81.6	—	—	44.8	18.4
Greece	49.8	37.9	0.1	0.1	50.1	61.9
Republic of Korea	48.4	35.8	—	7.5	51.6	56.7
Portugal	28.1	76.4	—	—	71.9	23.6
DAC average	84.5	86.5	0.2	0.2	15.4	13.3

Source: DAC statistics on OECD.STAT

*1 Fund assistance which does not limit procurement of necessary materials and equipment for the project to the donor country.

$ ^{*} $ 2 Fund assistance which limits procurement of necessary materials and equipment for the project to the donor country.

$ ^{*} $ 3 Countries are listed in descending order of their untied share.

$ ^{*} $ 4 Excludes technical cooperation and administrative costs.

$ ^{*} $ 5 The total may not amount to 100% due to rounding.
Chart IV-33 Comparison of ODA by Major DAC Countries

Quantitative comparison	Net disbursements	Japan	United States	United Kingdom	France	Germany	Italy	Canada	DAC Total
Net ODA disbursements (in 100 million USD)
2009	94.7	288.3	112.8	126.0	120.8	33.0	40.0	1,197.9
2010	110.2	303.5	130.5	129.2	129.9	30.0	52.0	1,284.6
As a percentage of GNI (%)	2009	0.18	0.21	0.51	0.47	0.35	0.16	0.30	0.31
2010	0.20	0.21	0.57	0.50	0.39	0.15	0.34	0.32
Share of DAC countries total (2010, %)	8.6	23.6	10.2	10.1	10.1	2.3	4.0	100.0
Change from previous year (2009 → 2010, %)	16.4	5.3	15.7	2.5	7.5	-9.1	30.0	7.2
Commitments in 2007 (including debt relief) (in 100 million USD)	182.1	334.4	150.9	145.6	164.9	38.8	45.5	1,480.2
Share of multilateral aid (average of 2008 and 2009, %)	31.8	12.0	35.4	41.1	38.0	66.7	26.0	29.5
Distribution (average of 2008 and 2009, %)	LDCs	40.6	43.4	49.7	34.4	35.8	42.2	56.9	43.5
LICs	25.5	13.2	15.9	15.7	10.7	9.5	14.8	14.3
Qualitative comparison	Commitments (units: %)
Grant element of total ODA (average of 2008 and 2009, excluding debt relief)	85.8	100.0	100.0	89.4	92.7	98.9	100.0	96.1
Grant element of bilateral loans (average of 2008 and 2009, excluding debt relief)	73.1	—	—	54.9	47.0	82.4	—	67.1
Grant element of bilateral ODA for LDCs (average of 2008 and 2009, excluding debt relief)	98.0	100.0	100.0	93.2	100.0	99.0	100.0	99.2
Grant share of total ODA (average of 2008 and 2009, excluding debt relief)	47.2	100.0	95.0	73.2	84.0	93.5	100.0	86.9
Grant share of total bilateral ODA (average of 2008 and 2009, excluding debt relief)	36.0	100.0	92.5	60.6	73.4	77.1	100.0	82.6
Tying status of bilateral ODA $ ^{*} $ (2009)	Untied	94.8	69.8	100.0	89.5	97.1	56.2	98.3	84.5
Partially Untied	—	—	—	—	—	0.5	0.0	0.2
Tied	5.2	30.2	—	10.5	2.9	43.2	1.7	15.4

Source: DAC Development Co-operation Report, DAC statistics on OECD.STAT

* Tying status of bilateral ODA excludes technical cooperation and administrative costs.

Chart IV-34 Sector Distribution of Bilateral ODA by Major DAC Countries (2009)

(Commitment basis, Units: %)

Country	Japan	United States	United Kingdom	France	Germany	Italy	Canada	DAC average
Social infrastructure	29.7	53.5	45.3	37.5	49.6	35.6	52.4	43.1
Economic infrastructure (excluding food aid)	33.5	9.0	13.4	9.3	21.8	5.8	3.3	14.6
Agricultural infrastructure	4.8	5.0	1.8	5.2	3.7	16.7	6.8	4.7
Industry and other production sectors $ (^{*1}) $	6.6	5.7	11.5	17.4	12.4	6.0	10.2	10.5
Emergency aid (including food aid)	2.3	15.8	9.6	0.4	4.3	8.6	8.1	8.7
Program assistance, etc. $ (^{*2}) $	23.0	11.0	18.3	30.2	8.1	27.2	19.2	18.4
Total	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0

Source: DAC statistics on OECD.STAT

$ ^{*} $ 1 “Industry and other production sectors” includes multi-sectors.

$ ^{*} $ 2 “Program assistance, etc.” includes such expenses as debt relief and administrative costs.

$ ^{*} $ 3 Due to rounding, the total may not match the sum of the total for each sector.

$ ^{*} $ 4 Excludes assistance to Eastern Europe and graduated countries.
Chart IV-35 Share of Aid through Multilateral Institutions among the ODA Totals of Major DAC Countries

(Net disbursement basis, average of two years, Units: %)

Country	2003/2004	2004/2005	2005/2006	2006/2007	2007/2008	2008/2009
Average	Average	Average	Average	Average	Average
Japan	31.2	26.1	27.3	30.8	27.2	31.8
United States	14.2	12.2	9.2	11.6	12.2	12.0
United Kingdom	35.0	27.6	27.2	35.7	39.5	35.4
France	31.4	30.8	26.5	30.8	37.8	41.1
Germany	44.9	36.0	29.4	34.1	35.2	38.0
Italy	63.9	60.6	51.1	57.0	64.8	66.7
Canada	27.9	24.1	27.9	26.8	26.5	26.0
DAC Average	29.9	26.7	24.7	27.9	29.2	29.5

Source: DAC statistics on OECD.STAT

* Some contributions for the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) are reported as ODA.
Chart IV-36 The Flow of Financial Resources from DAC Countries to Developing Countries (2009)

Country	ODA	OOF	Grant aid to NGOs	Private Flows (PF)	Total	ODA to GNI Ratio (%)
United States	28,831	988	16,288	69,168	115,276	0.82
France	12,602	294	—	25,524	38,420	1.43
Germany	12,079	187	1,369	15,495	29,130	0.86
United Kingdom	11,283	304	329	12,798	24,713	1.11
Japan	9,467	8,237	533	27,217	45,454	0.88
Spain	6,584	3	—	6,225	12,812	0.89
Netherlands	6,426	—	542	-923	6,045	0.77
Sweden	4,548	68	74	2,473	7,164	1.77
Norway	4,081	0	—	895	4,977	1.29
Canada	4,000	-1,138	1,338	3,140	7,340	0.56
Italy	3,297	-72	162	2,181	5,569	0.27
Denmark	2,810	233	116	599	3,757	1.18
Australia	2,762	371	—	—	3,133	0.33
Belgium	2,610	90	377	147	3,224	0.68
Switzerland	2,310	—	357	6,438	9,106	1.77
Finland	1,290	137	17	1,741	3,185	1.34
Austria	1,142	-44	140	2,035	3,273	0.87
Ireland	1,006	—	182	3,000	4,188	2.27
Republic of Korea	816	452	156	5,018	6,442	0.77
Greece	607	—	2	241	850	0.26
Portugal	513	—	4	-1,577	-1,060	-0.48
Luxembourg	415	—	13	—	428	1.08
New Zealand	309	8	46	24	387	0.35
DAC total	119,787	10,119	22,047	181,860	333,813	0.87

Source: DAC statistics on OECD.STAT

$ ^{*} $ 1 Countries are listed in descending order in terms of ODA disbursements.

$ ^{*} $ 2 Excludes assistance to Eastern Europe and graduated countries.

$ ^{*} $ 3 Due to rounding, the grand total may not match the sum of total.
Chart IV-37 Aid Disbursements by NGOs of DAC Countries

Country	Country	Country

Source: DAC statistics on OECD.STAT * NGO aid disbursements = NGO's own funds + Government subsidies
(1) Antigua & Barbuda and Oman exceeded the high income country threshold in 2007. In accordance with the DAC rules for revision of this List, both will graduate from the List in 2011 if they remain high income countries until 2010. (2) Barbados and Trinidad & Tobago exceeded the high income country threshold in 2006 and 2007. In accordance with the DAC rules for revision of this List, both will graduate from the List in 2011 if they remain high income countries until 2010.

(3) This does not imply any legal position of the OECD regarding Kosovo's status. Source: DAC Development Co-operation Report

## Section 3 DAC List of ODA Recipients

Chart IV-38	DAC List of Aid Recipients (Countries and Regions) for 2010
(Effective for reporting on 2009 and 2010 flows)
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) (49 countries)	Other Low Income Countries (LICs) (per capita GNI < US$935 in 2007)	Lower Middle Income Countries and Regions (LMICs) (per capita GNI US$936 - 3,705 in 2007)	Upper Middle Income Countries and Regions (UMICs) (per capita GNI US$3,706 - 11,455 in 2007)
Afghanistan	Mali	Côte d'Ivoire	Albania	Micronesia, Federated States	*Anguilla	Nauru
Angola	Mauritania	Ghana	Algeria	Moldova	Antigua and Barbuda¹	Oman¹
Bangladesh	Mozambique	Kenya	Armenia	Mongolia	Argentina	Palau
Benin	Myanmar	Korea, Dem. Rep.	Azerbaijan	Morocco	Barbados²	Panama
Bhutan	Nepal	Kyrgyz Rep.	Bolivia	Namibia	Belarus	Serbia
Burkina Faso	Niger	Nigeria	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Nicaragua	Belize	Seychelles
Burundi	Rwanda	Pakistan	Cameroon	Niger	Botswana	South Africa
Cambodia	Samoa	Papua New Guinea	Cape Verde	Palestinian Territories	Brazil	*St. Helena
Central African Rep.	São Tomé and Príncipe	Tajikistan	China	Paraguay	Chile	St. Kitts-Nevis
Chad	Senegal	Uzbekistan	Colombia	Peru	Cook Islands	St. Lucia
Comoros	Sierra Leone	Viet Nam	Congo, Rep.	Philippines	Costa Rica	St. Vincent and Grenadines
The Congo, Dem. Rep.	Solomon Islands	Zimbabwe	Dominican Republic	Sri Lanka	Croatia	Suriname
Djibouti	Somalia	Ecuador	Swaziland	Cuba	Trinidad and Tobago²
Equatorial Guinea	Sudan	Egypt	Syria	Commonwealth of Dominica	Turkey
Eritrea	Tanzania	El Salvador	Thailand	Fiji	Uruguay
Ethiopia	Timor-Leste	Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia	*Tokelau	Gabon	Venezuela
The Gambia	Togo	Georgia	Tonga	Grenada
Guinea	Tuvalu	Guatemala	Tunisia	Jamaica
Guinea-Bissau	Uganda	Guyana	Turkmenistan	Kazakhstan
Haiti	Vanuatu	Honduras	Ukraine	Lebanon
Kiribati	Yemen	India	*Wallis and Futuna	Libya
Laos	Zambia	Indonesia	Malaysia
Lesotho	Iran	Mauritius
Liberia	Iraq	*Mayotte
Madagascar	Jordan	Mexico
Malawi	Kosovo³	Montenegro
Maldives	Marshall Islands	*Montserrat
## Section 4 ODA from Non-DAC Donors

## Chart IV-39 ODA Disbursements from Non-DAC Donor Countries and Regions

Donor	Calendar year	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009
OECD Non-DAC
Czech Republic	135	161	179	249	215
Hungary	100	149	103	107	117
Iceland	27	41	48	48	34
Israel (a, b)	95	90	111	138	124
Poland	205	297	363	372	375
Slovak Republic	56	55	67	92	75
Slovenia	35	44	54	68	71
Turkey	601	714	602	780	707
Arab countries
Kuwait	218	158	110	283	221
Saudi Arabia	1,026	2,025	1,551	4,979	3,134
United Arab Emirates	141	219	429	88	834
Other donors
Taiwan	483	513	514	435	411
Thailand	—	74	67	178	40
Other donors (c)	51	77	134	275	313
Total	3,175	4,617	4,333	8,094	6,672
Of which:
Bilateral OECD Non-DAC
Czech Republic	64	78	81	117	101
Hungary	40	84	33	15	30
Iceland	20	28	37	36	25
Israel (a, b)	80	75	96	119	108
Poland	48	119	156	84	92
Slovak Republic	31	25	28	41	20
Slovenia	14	18	21	29	25
Turkey	532	643	545	736	665
Arab countries
Kuwait	218	157	109	282	220
Saudi Arabia	980	1,980	1,526	4,958	2,925
United Arab Emirates	141	219	429	88	834
Other donors
Taiwan	465	494	495	407	402
Thailand	—	65	61	166	35
Other donors (c)	8	25	67	94	99
Total	2,641	4,008	3,684	7,173	5,580

a) The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law.

b) These figures include USD 49.2 million in 2005, USD 45.5 million in 2006, USD 42.9 million in 2007, USD 43.6 million in 2008 and USD 35.4 million in 2009 for the first year sustenance expenses for persons arriving from developing countries (many of which are experiencing civil war or severe unrest), or individuals who have left due to humanitarian or political reasons.

c) Includes Cyprus, Estonia, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Malta and Romania.

Note: The above table does not reflect aid provided by several major emerging non-OECD donors, as information on their aid has not been disclosed.

Source: DAC Development Co-operation Report
## Abbreviations

A

AAA	Accra Agenda for Action
ABS	Access and Benefit-Sharing
ADB	Asian Development Bank
ADF	Asian Development Fund
AfDB	African Development Bank
AfDF	African Development Fund
AfT	Aid for Trade
AHA Centre	ASEAN Coordinating Centre for Humanitarian Assistance
APEC	Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
APO	Asian Productivity Organization
ASEAN	Association of Southeast Asian Nations
ASEM	Asia-Europe Meeting
AUN/SEED-Net	ASEAN University Network/ Southeast Asia Engineering Education Development Network
AU	African Union

B

BEGIN	Basic Education for Growth Initiative
BHN	Basic Human Needs
BOP	Base Of the economic Pyramid

C

CARD	Coalition for African Rice Development
CARICOM	Caribbean Community
CBD	Convention on Biological Diversity
CCT	Conditional Cash Transfers

Note: Includes abbreviations not contained in this paper.

CDP	UN Committee for Development Policy
CGIAR	Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research
CGIF	Credit Guarantee and Investment Facility
CIF	Climate Investment Fund
CMI	Chiang Mai Initiative
COP	Conference of Parties
CPA	Comprehensive Peace Agreement
CPCJF	Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Fund
CSR	Corporate Social Responsibility

D

DDR	Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration
DFC	Dedicated Freight Corridor
DFID	Department for International Development
DMIC	Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor

E

E/N	Exchange of Notes
EBRD	European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
EcoISD	Environmental Conservation Initiative for Sustainable Development
EEZ	Exclusive Economic Zone
EFA	Education for All
E-JUST	Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology
EMBRACE	Ensure Mothers and Babies Regular Access to Care