Product: Nutbag: The Story of the Vegas Ripper (2000)
Rating: 1.0
Independant So-Called Horror
Nutbag has the hype and glossy packaging that will spark your interest and lift your hopes that THIS will be the ONE thats good, this will be the one that will make up for all the money squandered on similar product. Well...guess what? it's not! Poor direction, no budget, extremely poor special effects, Beyond bad acting and mostly, NO Storyline worth dicussing! It seems to me to be nothing but a VERY poor excuse for some guys to be filmed killing totally naked women.I have nothing against naked women, but it seems the whole budget was spent on Silicone Babes. was the director's intent to make a Horror film or a Porno film? I think he failed in both areas.A good horror film should be creepy, suspenceful, dramatic, gory, thought-provoking, even repulsive! Nutbag is none of these and it would'nt be worth ten dollars, let alone what I paid for it. Now don't get me wrong, I haven't made a film and kudos should go to the director for doing this. But IF the director WAS inspired by the posters on the killer's wall then maybe he should have gleened some of their low-budget glory rather than making this re-hashed, mish-mashed mess. In Henry: Portriat Of A Serial Killer, the viewer dangerously empathisized with the killer, in Nutbag the viewer simply waits for the damn thing to get better or just END!