Product review (1 stars): So many cons, no real pros
Let me preface my review by saying that while I unfortunately own this range, I didn't choose it (it came with the house). I've been using it regularly for 8 months now, and there are just so many cons. Here goes:

It's small. Yes it's 30 inches wide and therefore not huge, but the design of the stove makes its usable space even smaller than necessary. For instance, the interior oven space is small. The movable racks are oddly spaced (see photo), and so even with the rack on the lowest rung, the usable oven space is not even 2 ft wide x 1 ft high. (And you can't use the lowest rung anyway, because anything you try to cook there, even at a super low temperature for barely 10 minutes, will burn. So forget about putting 2 things in the oven at once. Even if you can get them to physically fit, the one on the bottom will most certainly burn).

The varying sizes of burners is unnecessary and inconvenient (see photo, please ignore the spills as I just snapped this photo while cooking). There are 2 normal sized burners on the right. On the left, the back burner is minuscule, and I'm not sure why that's considered a good idea in the stove design world. If you want low heat/flame, just set a normal sized burner to low. It's not rocket science. The front left burner is a double ring - the inner ring (much like the back left burner), is too small to use (the only time I ever use it is to cook a single egg in a tiny pan, but again, this is something that can easily be accomplished on a normal sized burner set to low), and the larger outer ring is so massive that even with the flame at its lowest, the flames curl up around the sides of even very large pots. Not exactly great for safety. I only use the massive ring of fire when cooking with a wok, and then it's almost ok.

The height of the stove is very low, and even though I'm not exactly a giant (I'm 5'7''), I always feel like I'm hunching over when I cook (and yes, I did adjust the legs to optimize the stove height). Furthermore the location of the knobs is unnecessarily low. I need to full out bend over to see which burner I'm turning on. And forget about the handle bar - it's annoyingly low to hang a kitchen towel from.

The bottom of the range is neither a drawer nor a broiler. It's not even extra oven space. Just seems like a big waste, esp when the unit is so pressed for space to begin with.

The range has legs, and no matter how many times I check it with a level in every which direction to confirm that it's straight, I still feel like anything I cook on the front burners is about to slide off onto my legs. To be honest, I'm not sure why anyone would want a range on legs, although sure it looks all designy and everything. But the kitchen floor under it will always look dirty, unless you want to sweep it out every couple of days, and hey that's cool if that's your thing.

It's kid unsafe. As I mentioned above, the stove surface is low to the ground, and not only are the knobs ridiculously low, but they're spaced together so closely that childproof knob covers won't fit. Also, if you have kids, you really don't want this stove anyway because you can't cook or bake very much at one time with it.

The oven light doesn't come on automatically when you open the door - you need to turn it on manually. That's just annoying.

It's crazy expensive.

So here's the pro (and I tried really hard to think of more than just one): I would choose this range over an open bonfire in the woods. So it's got that going for it. Otherwise I wouldn't consider buying it unless maybe you are someone who really doesn't cook very often or ever in large quantities (i.e. no kids, no holiday hosting), you love things that look designy like legs on a range (but you also love to clean difficult to reach floor spaces), you're shorter than 5'7'', and you have extra cash to burn.