'Sophisticated Evaluation of Serious Research' at the New York Times?
Category: SCIENCE
Some editors at the New York Times seem to have either developed a severe case of institutional amnesia, or decided to confer the presumption of innocence upon cellphone radiation, as the newspaper did upon asbestos for an entire decade after the mineral had been shown to be the most important industrial carcinogen in the world.
By Paul Brodeur, ContributorFmr. staff writer at The New Yorker, 2015-03-28