Review: Not Frat Boy and Toppy
Rating: 1 out of 5
Date: 10 28, 2013
Not sure why the author thought she needed to obliterate all that was interesting and funny and human and sexy about these guys from the 1st book in this series  when penning "Good Boy" but it's probably the same reason she allowed the picture of the kid with the horrendous purple underpants to be on the cover of the 3rd book in the series "Sweet Thang." Or that she titled the 3rd book "Sweet Thang" in the first place. I digress...The 1st in this series, "Frat Boy and Toppy" was SURPRISINGLY good (not sure why I even relented and read it based on the title (srsly?)) The characters really win you over because they are well developed, complex, flawed, funny and snarky and sexy. Good Boy? It's like someone told Anne Tenino that she should do a Master/slave thing because collaring is the "new thing" in m/m. Collaring is fine if it makes sense based on the characters. But in this case? It absolutely destroys the characters she built in the 1st book. I missed Brad and Sebastian reading Good Boy. The names were the same. The universe was the same but the personalities were thrown under the bus for the idea of collaring. It's a shame.