Review: Good Story
Rating: 4 out of 5
Date: 09 9, 2012
I have to go with reviewer Chrono.  This is a good story that could have been a great book.  Did anyone read this before publishing?  At 38% I had 49 proofing errors.  Careless mistakes that made what could have been one of the best books I've read in a long time just too difficult to deal with.How sad for the author.  I'm sure he has friends that could have read the book and pointed out the majority of mistakes.  Missed words, contractions, and endless hypens:< made me want to scream.If William doesn't do any thing but remove the hypens, it would be a great improvement.This really could be a great book.  It was funny and dark.  I gave it 4 stars for the story.  It's worth reading.  Good luck Mr. Bebb, but please get an editor.