Review: Some redeeming qualities to this book.
Rating: 3 out of 5
Date: 11 3, 2012
I thought that it had a good story line, a least one half or more of this book was so intriguing that I could not stop reading it. I really like the medieval scottish highlander stories. I have not read a story quite like this before so it was quite exciting and new to me.The errors in the beginning were so bad I really became irratated and was going to just delete it out.  I decided that if I scanned a little more that maybe the errors would stop.  Once I scanned through the oral sex section (the rest of the love scenes were pretty tame)the reading became better, not perfect just better, and it seemed to remain tolerable until the last few pages.I just completed Justice for Emily by author Sandy Wolters.  In her author's notes she praised Dannye Williamsen of Williamsen Publication/Your Editing Partner, for editing her book Justice for Emily.  The grammar was flawless. i read it after this book and was so grateful to be able to sit back and really enjoy the book and story, without having to keep going back and re-reading the same parts over and over again to make sense of what the author was trying to say. Other than having head for heard and tie for time and fed for fend, the use of pronouns were horrendous.  Even though there were a man and woman interacting in the scene, there was use of the male pronoun thoughout the whole paragraph. To paraphrase: He took his hand and lightly touching his face he left out a soft sigh.  This happened several times.Maybe Stephanie Sterling could avail herself of Ms. Williamsen's expertise.  There is no reason for an author that has any pride in her/his work to permit it to be made available to the public unless they feel that the product is the best that they can make it.Perhaps hiring an editor, is an expense that the author can ill afford, but I believe it is cheaper than incurring the wrath and disappointment of her readers.  They will not come back.