Review: OK story botched by wackadoodle grammar
Rating: 3 out of 5
Date: 06 11, 2014
This story was interesting and somewhat enjoyable. I liked the characters and the descriptions were good. But this author has some writing quirks that kept yanking me out of the story. At first, I didn't realize the writer is the same one who wrote "Faders." I caught on as I noticed her frequent mis-use of the word "menacing". Honestly, this must be one of her favorite words, but she always uses it incorrectly. There is no such thing as a menacing twinkle in the eye. Menacing means threatening or dangerous, period.This book is better than Faders, but it's weird how the writing flows along well and sounds articulate and then suddenly, "he sighs out," or "he chuckles out." What?! It's like a grammatically inept kid took over while Owens went to the loo.The ending is a set-up for the next book in the series. I was kind of curious as to what happens with the two leads, but when I read the reviews for the next book, I knew it would be just as frustrating so I'll pass.