Review: Would be better if it weren't flawed...
Rating: 3 out of 5
Date: 10 28, 2012
This book would have been a lot better if the author hadn't lost track of his investigators in the middle and screwed up who did what. I hate when authors do that. This is especially annoying because it was relevant to the solution of the mystery, which makes the flaw pretty serious.Better characterization and differentiation of perspectives would certainly be an improvement. Maybe other readers don't even notice the error because the perspectives are so similar.But it was a decent enough quick-read mystery other than that.