Review: Should be four stars
Rating: 3 out of 5
Date: 02 10, 2012
So then why isnt it four stars? EDITING, Terry needs to get a new editor badly. There were typos everywhere such a yuo instead of you, some sentences even stopped halfway through. However the worst example is at a certain point in a book a man named Kaviel dies (not important) then a few pages later he is said to be attending a meeting of the soldiers, hmm how does that work? It then again says hes dead a few pages after that., its rediculous. How was this missed?!Now for the rest, if you can manage to ignore the poor editing it is a great book. The author aplits it into two simultaneous stories, one in the past and one in the present. This creates a good alternating balance between the more action oriented parts and the meat of the story. Unfortuantly it also hurts the plot some making it feel choppy and not flowing easily at times.All in all i feel this book is an improvement on the first and hope the trend continues.HOWEVER i recommend waiting to see if the author will release an updated and IMPROVED version editting wise.