Review: Should have been better
Rating: 1 out of 5
Date: 01 20, 2013
I liked the idea...a day in the life of whore, without it being erotica.The first story was well written and seemed to be edited nicely. After that, though, the writing was often hurried and the editing almost nonexistent. Some stories were one long paragraph. Dialogue was often not written correctly causing confusion about what was being said. In spots, scenes switched abruptly.The author proclaims in the copyright section that she performed a certain kind of activity a lot (review guidelines prevent being able to quote her activity specifically) "and spent days at the computer to write this. Have some (f- bomb) respect and pay for it." As if somehow she was more entitled to her work being protected than a writer who was more selective with their oral choices.Some more time at the computer doing rewrites could have easily made this a four star book, as some of the writing reflects, the writer is talented.