Review: author hates all things religious
Rating: 1 out of 5
Date: 12 18, 2011
I agree with R.Gill that , "This book is a very long lecture on the evils of Republican Christian gun toting meat eating humans."  The religious leaders in the book not only drugged their flock to keep them in line (more than one group did this) but one group even went so far as poisoning anyone who disagreed with them including children. Really?I found it hypocritical that the main character believes in letting everyone live their personal lives yet the whole book was written to consistently dump on groups that obviously disagree with the author's point of view.  So in short the only good guys in the book are vegetarian atheists and strangely enough one Buddhist.  I guess Buddhists make the author's cool list to.The best part of the book were the chapters written from the dogs point of view, very well done and enjoyable.  It is a shame that the author had to spoil the majority of his book with constant bashing.  I would not have mentioned it, if it occurred only once in a while, but it was pervasive throughout the book.And, so you don't think I don't like the book simply because of my point of view, here is a another quote from a review by Brian Garst:"Unfortunately, the story was held down by the author's apparent hatred for all things religious. I'm not a religious person, so that doesn't bother me per se, but when it drags down the story with silly characterizations and predictable plot lines, it becomes a problem. Simply put, everyone evil is religious, and everyone religious is evil. It gets boring, quick."