Review: Too condensed
Rating: 3 out of 5
Date: 10 1, 2012
I'm puzzled by the contradictory reviews.  Yes this book is dated (1st published in 2001 I believe), and yes it's too short and feels rushed, and no it isn't as good as her full length novels.  But is is a novella and as such, isn't a bad story.  It just could've been a much better story if it had been longer.  Then the characters could've had more depth to them. And the relationship just happened way too quickly to be believable, but how can you avoid that in such a short format?  It's also too much money for how short it is, but that's the publishers fault.