Review: I don't expect erotica to read like Shakespeare
Rating: 2 out of 5
Date: 07 8, 2012
however, note to author. Get. An. Editor. Seriously.  If you have one, get another, the one you have is not doing you any favors. This review is for both "In Heat" books.  Let's see, where to start? (There will be spoilers here.) I read both books in the series, to see many errors there were in them (they were free, after all). Answer, a lot. You are usually satiated after sex, not sedated.  Your brows do not marry in a frown,(unibrow?) they are marred.  The grammatical errors (her and Erik instead of she and Erik), and the typos (I assume) where "she" is "he" and then the rest of the sentence doesn't make sense are everywhere. (Kind of stops any flow of the story if you have to think about it.) It was taboo for Kim to go out with a client, but her supervisor could molest him without punishment. I'm not sure how old a woman has to be to be a "woman" instead of a "girl" in Erik's mind, but I guess late 20's isn't it. The "dreams" in the first book, became "visions" in the second book.  The whole plot in the second book was pretty pitiful.  Throw a ball, a prince is supposed to show up, yet no one is there to greet him, what, he just sneaked in? The prince goes to Kim's office, kisses her, and she gets whiny because everyone is speaking badly about her?  Grow up.  Then Kim has a make out session with Erik in the middle of the office, and no one either notices or says anything.  There are lots of "visions" of a threesome, but it never happens in real life? Unlike the other visions?  Kim just tells the prince that Erik has wanted her longer, and that's it?  And she tells him he should be a little less insane? Really?  I got the feeling the author had a bunch of sex scenes in her head, and she needed a thin thread to tie them together.  That is what this is.  It could have a used some more work.  But, again, it is erotica, not Shakespeare.