Review: is more speculative than I thought
Rating: 3 out of 5
Date: 05 13, 2014
I originally bought this book because I thought it was going to be some factual history concerning the Knights Templar. What you get is writing that smacks of something Dan Brown would write. The big difference is Brown lets you know that he is writing fiction. Mr. Fedan, it seems would like you to believe that his speculations are based on facts, but clearly they're not.He cites Elaine Pagels, but since I am familiar with her writing, I find he left most of what she said out.He writes well, was entertaining,  but shouldn't try to push his other book so hard while trying to get you to believe he is being factual.He did do some research,  and writes well, so I don't want to condemn his book entirely. Just remember that this is mostly fiction and to draw what you will from it.