Review: Not a stand alone book
Rating: 2 out of 5
Date: 01 4, 2013
Before I purchased I wanted to make sure it could be read as a stand alone since I hadn't read the first... even though it says it can be let me clearly tell you that it is NOT. After I got past the big questions that I probably missed in the first I was left with even bigger ones for this book. It seemed rushed throughout and as a reader I kept saying what? Huh? Excuse me?  I couldn't get into the book because of this... if It had been a much longer story and more detail had been written in it would have overall had a much better story line.  With this being said I though it was an ok book that showed promise. Would I read the next one...? NO, but do I regret reading this story.... no.