Review: Could have been much better
Rating: 3 out of 5
Date: 11 29, 2012
I am reviewing on my Kindle, so I might make some typos myself. Given that, I have to say that this could have been so much better, given the slightest bit of attention. However, either the author couldn't be bothered, or she didn't have an editor. At least one that could read. I was continuously lost within the time frame of the story. It felt, given the writing, that everything happened in a manner of, what? A day? Two days? Then a house gets designed, the blueprints are approved and the building is done, so it has to have been longer than that. There is honestly no,real way of knowing. Add in the poor writing, grammar, etc., (even through I rarely ever kick a writer for said irritating happen stance, in this case it drove me nuts.)It could have been a solid four, but in this case? I am being very, very generous with a three. I won't waste this kind of time again. A shame.