Review: The spelling and grammatical errors, switching of POV's and changing narrative form ruined this!
Rating: 1 out of 5
Date: 08 22, 2013
This book was not well written.  I am surprised that other reviewers did not notice.  Actually, I am baffled.  The plot in this book was not original.  I have read many books prior to this one with similar plots.  However, it still could have been a good book had it not been for:1.  The spelling errors (i.e., quit for quite, patients for patience, ware for wear, etc.).  There were so many errors that it could not be overlooked and became bothersome.2.  The grammatical errors (i.e., semantics, syntax, etc.).3.  The punctuation errors (There was missing punctuation, commas at the end of a sentence versus a period, etc.).  One of the biggest errors was when the author quoted something.  The punctuation was horrible.4.  Lack of an editor (see the above comments).5.  Switching point of views without any delineation.  This story switched from the point of view of Charlie, Brody, Michael and O'Connor without anything delineation.  It was confusing and a mess.  Also, it was too many point of views.6.  Switching from past to present/present to past without any delineation.  It did this for Charlie, Broody and Michael.7.  The narrative switched.  It appeared to be written in first person and third person and would switch.  One minute is was "I" then "He/She" then "They."  You get the idea.  Also, it would switch mid narrative.  This was probably the worst offense.With all of the above mentioned, this book was not well written and not worth a read.