Review: Decent writing, but bad editing...
Rating: 3 out of 5
Date: 01 23, 2014
This author is pretty good.  Simplistic writing, but does keep you interested until the end.Speaking of the end now....The entire book is about this guy...the killer.  The thing is, the end is a big let down.  Too simple and it was much too easy.The killer was portrayed as clever, crafty and very intelligent with unlimited resources.  The agent knocks him on the head a couple of times with a rock and he's dead and story over?I was disappointed with how this ended.  It's tough when you have build-up throughout a book but the ending comes very swiftly and then abruptly ends.  Over.Oh well.If I had to guess, Id say this was self-edited.  I HOPE it was self edited, because a pro would not have missed the problems in this book.The author states the Casanova Killer slit his victims throats from right to left, but then during another killing, the agents mention his M.O. as slitting the throats from left to right.The next time?  The writer goes back to right to left again.  Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!! Pick one and stick with it.  Family and friends WON'T catch stuff like this.  You're a good writer.  Get your books professionally edited.There were so many commas, that there would be enough left over for another two or three books.  She describes the killer as having "longish, black, hair".There are zero commas during all of that my dear.  "longish black hair" would only have a comma after hair, if there's another descriptive word following that.  This happened quite often.Many, many sentences missing words.Had this been edited properly, I would have given a higher rating.  This gal can write, so it's too bad, there were so many mistakes.  Good story though.