Review: 4 Cuz It Needs Better Editor
Rating: 4 out of 5
Date: 10 6, 2013
I wished he had a better editor/proofreader. Otherwise, it was a fun read. Sure, it's not like it could be compared to be on par with 1632 by Eric Flint and Gang or March Up Country by John Ringo, but it was a good read. There was almost enough technical and historical technologies that made it almost plausible.Yes, it was an almost copy right of Stargate SG-1, almost but then again, who doesn't use worm hole/spatial distortions/dimensional tears to get past the light speed barrier??The only thing that really bogged me down was the editing. I'd say there were about 20 possible errors in a 800 + book. Some grammatical, some just plain "why did the character say the same question over again?" weird. Otherwise, a very superb and entertaining story.If you polished it up 2 x more times. I would say : You write and I will buy. But as it is. I can only say: You write and I may buy.See you again out there.