Review: OK
Rating: 3 out of 5
Date: 07 21, 2014
When I was 18 or so, I lived with a guy. We'll call he D., shall we? In a lot of ways, he was wonderful. He was sweet, loved to cook and equated sex with love. And while we were young and hardly tantric gods, he always strove to let me know I was appreciated. *sigh*D. however had had a bit of an unfortunate childhood and he never developed any real coping mechanisms. NONE. As a result, disagreeing with him, even on small matters, was tantamount to a verbal attack. And any attempt to hash out larger issues or have an actual argument (which, lets face it, relationships need occasionally) would throw him into a blind rage. He'd lash out, hit and randomly destroy things. (Never me, just things.) Our apartment took more than one thrashing.D. was scary at those times. But no matter how angry or scared I was, I wasn't ever blind enough not to see that a good bit of his ill-timed anger was actually hurt, confusion or plain frustration that he had no other way to express. At those times, my heart always ached a little for him. Even more so when I had to face his lost, betrayed face after the anger ebbed. The puffed up gorilla melted into a wounded puppy. (Not that I ever would have told him he gave that impression.)I say all this because, for a lot of this book, Stitch reminded me a lot of D. I recognised so many of D.'s quirks in him that it was a little frightening. (But also made him feel very real for me.) Especially the way he could do something shockingly inappropriate and not grock why I was angry. Or the way he could sometimes go from irate to conjoling almost instantly, as if I was the one who'd been upset in the first place. Or the way he would react with almost mindless violence, only to then be bewildered by the aftereffect of his own actions.Because I loved D. for a little while I understood Stitch's emotionalism. I don't think I would have otherwise. My own past endeared him to me. But honestly, that grace only reaches so far. I may have understood his outbursts, but I can't make the same claim for some of his other actions. For example, I wasn't ever sure how Stitch made the leap from closeted, will-never-act-on-it gay to seeking out Zak between one chapter and the next.Or that for much of the book, he came across as a little dim or at least like the kind of guy who isn't well versed in verbally expressing himself. Then he would randomly come out with seemingly soul searing statements that were romantic, sure, but way out of character for him.Having said all of that, if in the years since I last saw D. he has managed half the personal growth Stitch does toward the end of this book he'd be quite the catch now. It is toward the end of the book though. The vast majority of it is Stitch trying and largely failing to come to terms with his own proclivities. It's hugely satisfying when he finally does, but I thought the book drug a bit in the middle as he came to accept himself.This is largely because there was just too much darned sex. Yes, I did say that. It got in the way of the plot (which isn't really all that thick to start with). Plus, every single stage of his gayness had to be addressed separately. (I don't know how better to phrase that.) As a result, the only thing we see Stitch and Zak do is have lots and lots of sex. We're told that they walk the dog, cook together, fix up the house, etc. but we never see any of it. We also never see any of their personality that isn't directly related to their sexual orientation, the motorcycle club or Holly & Chrystal. So their personalities feel a little weak, as do all of the club members.So I'm a little torn about how I feel about Road of no Return. I liked the ending. I liked Zak a lot (even if he did get a little wife-like at one point). I liked that Stitch finally came into his own and I loved his vulnerable moments. But I didn't like the WTF at 85% and feel the book ended with the issue unresolved. I didn't care for the insta-lust. I also thought there was a bit of a cheesy undertone to a lot of the dialogue. In the end I could easily go either way, liking the book or feeling ambivalent about it. I didn't dislike it. I just didn't love it either.Best line of the book: "Not to mention he's most probably in a closet so deep he's, like, in Narnia."