Review: Not to be unfair but....
Rating: 1 out of 5
Date: 02 10, 2013
While there is a story here, I object to the following:1. Misspelled words.2. Run on sentences.3. Incorrect use of words.4. Sentences that are unstructured and not finished.5. Grammar usage was fair to not so good.I think to be fair to the author of this book I will say these things.I enjoyed the story, however, I would of been angry if I had paid for this. Why? For the above reasons and for these reasons. I love historical romance books. I do not object to condom usage... perhaps you could of phrased this as sheep skin or pig skin covers or other adjectives that have been used before in historical romances to describe this. I do not object to words like running water. If we understand it right many years ago the romans and greeks had running water. (Lost in time=?). What I objected to was the run on and the incorrect grammar and the phrasing the got lost. Sometimes the words thate were misspelled. All of those items took away from the story itself. Do I think the author can write? I see a lot of talent there. Like I said the story itself while it could of been edited and not so much of the sex and more of the story, the author has talent showing. Now have a good editor, someone that reads and can help you with the phrasing and perhaps the grammar at times. You will go far. Thank you for allowing me to read your work.Regards,Anna