Review: Story = Good.  Editing/spelling/grammar = Bad.
Rating: 3 out of 5
Date: 08 15, 2012
Professionally edited? I think not.  If the author paid someone to proof-read this, he needs to get his money back.  I am not seeing grammatical mistakes, so much as I am seeing words used improperly.  "pedal" when the correct word would be "petal".  Flowers have petals, bikes have pedals.  Edward doesn't have possession of his own Air Force Base.EDIT/ ADDENDUM:The story itself caught my attention and managed to keep it in spite of the spelling and grammar errors.  I actually went looking on Amazon for the sequel when I finished this story.  That is saying a lot, considering there were times that the errors honestly made me want to delete it. I encourage anyone interested in this story to read through the entire thread of the conversation between myself and the author below.  He's trying, and he actually reads and responds to the feedback that we leave for him.  That also says a lot for him. (aside from the hints to change my review).  I will never be someone that publishes a novel, but I will be someone that reads a LOT of them, and I will offer my honest opinion.  Not necessarily a NICE opinion, but honest nonetheless.