Review: Great writing-needs serious proof-reading
Rating: 3 out of 5
Date: 06 4, 2013
I started off truly enjoying the writing style.  It is NOT an action story at all.  In fact, it moves rather slowly, but the descriptions, dialogue and overall writing style are very inviting.  That is until about 40% through the book, where errors are glaring and interfere with reading a great deal ("hose" instead of "horse"; "bind" instead of "mind"; "cold" instead of "could", repeatedly).  Very distracting and really took away from the read for me.  The proof reader apparently got back on the job on the last third of the book and all was well again.  Without this significant issue I would have given the book 4 stars.