Review: the writing is not as good as in some of his other works, the idea is flawed, and pointless, felt like he had a deadline to make
Rating: 1 out of 5
Date: 12 6, 2013
some books McBride really connects on and knocks it out of the park, others he does not do so impressively, this is one that he swings and misses.for under a buck it is something to read and I am a voracious reader so am always looking for something, often anything, ....I read it in a little over an hour, its young adult level reading at best and I tell you to seriously consider the 1 and 2 star ratings, the 5 star are those small minority of people that LOVE bubble gum ice cream and burnt caramel scented candles. or are the publisher, or the publishers friends, or are the authors friends and family.I will sit down and try it again, slowly sounding the words out and see if a second reading makes it better, but honestly I don't think it will help. To each their own? yeah, maybe.EDIT: I sat down tried to re-read it and that oh so misinformed and stupid opening made me give it up...and its a solid no star book but I have no option of less than one star...there really should be a zero star rating, even a negative star rating, this terrible attempt by McBride  combined with some of his other crappers really make a negative star review a needed option.