Review: Escapism and a reasonable read. Too bad poor ...
Rating: 3 out of 5
Date: 02 27, 2014
Grammar was shockingly poor through first 80% of book. Cheap editing skills with silly mistakes distracting from the read. Multiple dual pronouns, the for they, is for was, lions for loins, and on and on. It became a game to see how many errors. Of course that distracted from the read. Fire the twit who proofed the majority of this book. Never ever rely on spell check only and please correct for future readers. Thanks. Hopefully other books have better proof readers. 3 stars.