Review: VERY suspicious 5-star reviews for this book.
Rating: 2 out of 5
Date: 04 1, 2012
This book is amateurish at best, and yet it has (at this time) an overall rating of four-and-a-half stars????Several of the 5-star reviewers have posted only this one single review.  Hmmm.... Something is a bit odd here.Now that I have said this right out loud, I shall prepare to be lambasted and pummeled with negative votes from the five-stars, and their sisters, and their cousins, and their aunts.  All I can say is go for it, if it makes you feel better.I just can't generate much enthusiasm for an author who writes in fragment sentences, and obviously does not know that the sprouting tendrils of new spring grass are referred to as "shoots," not "shutes."I'm glad I got this book for free.