Review: Just ok
Rating: 3 out of 5
Date: 07 19, 2014
This was an all right book, I suppose. Just, as it turns our, REALLY not my cup of tea. I'm not a big fan of the heavy 'Awww' moments on the best of days and The Guy From Glamour is practically a hike through the hearts and flowers garden. I can handle it a lot better in m/m romance than het, which is why I picked this up in the first place. (Plus, I expected a bit more grit from the soldier.) But in the end, there wasn't enough other stuff to keep my interest. And lacking distracting 'oh, I'm happy with that' moments I was left too aware of the text for all the little annoyances to pass unnoticed.I don't really know how to explain my biggest one, but in general I've noticed that when an author writes about things they don't know that much about (in this case combat pilots), it's pretty obvious. Even if every word is technically accurate. They explain things that don't need explaining. Things that someone immersed in the subject would hardly notice are made big deals of. Their characters talk about their jobs or missions in ways that don't feel natural. Here's an example: "We're special Forces. We're the most elite helicopter force in the whole damn world. We fly into enemy territory and navigate our way through it to complete search-and-rescue missions or perform high-risk air assaults."Sure, the wikipedia page might describe the Night Stalkers that way, but I can't even imagine an actual soldier doing so. Plus, other characters are overly aware of what a Night Stalker is and give undue accolades for it. Cates is guilty of all of the above. Maybe I'm wrong about how much she does or doesn't actually know about the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment, but something about the way Dean and his position is written didn't feel real to me.Similarly, I spent several years working in Children's Protective Services, dealing with the children brought into the Foster Care system. Let me just tell you, this book really should be labeled as fantasy for how it describes the process and what it's like.I also had issues with writing itself. It was fairly well edited, but I thought the writing was stiff, especially in the beginning. There were lots and lots of blunt, staccato, telling sentences. Plus, everything was just sort of thrown on the table with very little finesse. Characters met and then immediately explained their entire life story and such (much of which wasn't really needed anyway). Good for providing the reader information, not so good for feeling like realistic dialogue. The whole thing just felt kind of clumsy. You knew exactly where it was going at all times and it lurched there unfailingly. No surprises or subtlety involved. Plus, there was almost no character development. I never felt I really knew either MC and Nikki was just a shadow puppet. I was more attached tot he puppy than her.Again, most of my complaints are personal. For readers who like guaranteed happy endings and what I call cheesy moments (but people who like them probably would call sweet scenes) this book might be a hit. I appreciated what the story was trying to accomplish. I was impressed to find that some characters with a history in the foster care system were there for neglect rather than abuse. So often, people forget that there are other, less dramatic reasons for children to be removed from their parents. I really liked that there was no strict designation of position, no exclusive top and/or bottom. I liked that one scene with Dean and Rick. There where aspects of this book I liked, but on the whole it was a fail for me.