Review: A very well written bad book
Rating: 4 out of 5
Date: 07 5, 2014
This is one of the more difficult reviews I've done.  In a sentence, this is a bad book written VERY well. Hence the 4 stars, actually it's like 3.5, but because of my "history" with the writer---I've loved everything she has written up to this point, I'm rounding up :)Ok, all the bad stuff: Crispin isn't a dom, he is a messed up stalker pretending to be a dom. The whole point of D/s is missed, the "love" was non-existent,  Kitten had significant relationship issues, who needed a good therapist MUCH more than she needed Richard,  the ENITRE "relationship" was based on three weeks together...THREE WEEKS!!!, the "villains" were lame, there was NO respect for the timeline, Kitten's father was supposed to be like "Papa Pope" on Scandal, but nope, he was lame too; couldn't get a grip on the Richard character, the list goes on and on.So why the 4 stars??? Do you have ANY idea how hard it is to enjoy a bad book?  It is almost impossible but Sienna did it.  This is a beautifully written book.  Any time you are reading and say " This is stupid".... and keep reading and " This isn't right" ....and keep reading and "Really?".... and keep reading and at the end of the book YOU AREN'T MAD FOR WASTING YOUR TIME READING THE BOOK.  That, my friends, is a bloody good writer. There isn't a word wasted, the dialogue is wonderful, even if the motivation is lame, the descriptions are spot on and you feel the characters emotions.This part is directly to Sienna: If you can make this book, this good, then I BEG of you, read some Nikki Sex, Holly S. Roberts, Joey W. Hill and my all time fave, Cherise  Sinclair.  Make some friends on ALT. com, go to a few munchies in your hometown and THEN write a BDSM novel that I have no doubt will people saying all over the world "Wow! We thought 'Fifty Shades of Gray' was good, let me tell you, THIS book is the real thing!"  Please Sienna, I know you can do it.