Review: Close to 4 1/2 stars, but
Rating: 4 out of 5
Date: 09 13, 2013
The story is good, and the characters we already know from prior books are nice to revisit. There are even some hints that could lead to possible future stories. However, I have to make note of the fact that a spell-checker just can not substitute for a good copy editor. When you are trying to follow a fast-paced mystery, these errors are distracting. You "peek" at someone, not "peak," it's "principal amount" not "principle," and someone who feels nauseated does not "wretch".