Review: Needed better editing.
Rating: 2 out of 5
Date: 11 4, 2013
The premise was good, the editing in the book made it hard for me to understand.  One passage was repeated and totally threw me for a loop.  Also, there was a mix up of time between contractions.  Just confusing because of the editing.  I try to write an honest review and with all her credentials you would think she would get it edited better.  Just saying this is my opinion, I wish I could honestly give it a better rating, but like I said editing is key, and it was stilted.  I will try to read other works by this author and see if this one was just a fluke.