Review: Unengaging and difficult to decipher
Rating: 2 out of 5
Date: 02 10, 2013
I couldn't bring myself to care about the leads of this piece because they weren't really characters. They were one or two character traits bundled together. I found myself paging ahead quite often, never a good sign for a piece of this length. The spelling and grammar errors that riddle the manuscript lead me to believe that the author flat-out refused to proof-read. "Meant" for "met"? How do you make that mistake repeatedly?