Review: Excellent book but no need for thie bluestocking to stay secret
Rating: 5 out of 5
Date: 05 7, 2014
This was a very well-off woman who did not need to marry.  Her bluestocking proclivities, thus, did not need to be hid, as, since she had no plans to marry, she did not need to hide them from a husband, and being a bluestocking itself would not have barred her from society.  That was the one complaint that I had with this book.  Aside from that, it reminded me a great deal of Georgette Heyer (whom, if I recall correctly, DID have a bluestocking heroine who did not hide it, and that woman was welcomed in all quarters, as she was financially secure and didn't need a husband).  So refreshing to read a REAL Regency Romance, not a sex book trying to disguise itself as a Regency Romance!