Review: The story was well told, but the proofing and editing were awful.
Rating: 3 out of 5
Date: 04 16, 2013
The story was well told, although I had to suspend my disbelief occasionally. However I was stopped numerous times by the poor proofing and editing. Lots of spaces between words were missing. Many of the editing "fails" were common, such as: passed/past; into/in to; your/you're; too/to; and whole/hole. But others were just poor word choices or substitutions such as: conscious/conscience; nap/nape; bared/bore; pleasure/pleasant; scare/scar; wondering/wandering; segregate/surrogate; and bare/bear. These stopped the flow of the story for this reader.