Review: Great concept, poorly executed
Rating: 1 out of 5
Date: 08 16, 2013
I read the first in this series, which was poorly-edited. I struggled through cartoonish villains and poor character development. I put aside the poor editing and proofreading, and enjoyed the actual concept.Then I started this sequel.The characters are even less-believable. The villains are so tacky it hurts. The name of the bad-guy special forces unit is laughable.The creatures are reasonable, but badly written.Then we get to the grammar and word usage.This book is so badly edited that I just couldn't get past it.Incorrect words used all the time.Repetitious.Terrible sentence structure.No proofreading at all.Verb and noun confusion.The list goes on...If you enjoy a well-written book, don't bother with this.If you like something purely for the concept, and can look past the terrible writing, then I guess give it a try.I wouldn't recommend it.Geoff Brown - president, AHWA