Review: Conspiracy and double-crossing meet archaeology
Rating: 4 out of 5
Date: 10 24, 2013
This is a nicely written tale of archaeology but tarted up with politics and conspiracy.  The characters are well done and I liked the way the author switched between the journal of the Spanish explorers and the events in the present day (of the story).  I also liked how the author manipulated how some characters changed from threatening to benevolent and vice versa.I did notice an apparent error but this didn't play a major role in the story.  (How is the agent following Matt and Aimee able to hear their conversations after Matt has removed the transmitter?)An enjoyable read with a lot of expressions and words unfamiliar to us Americans but this added to the story.