Review: Good story spoiled by errors. Needs major editing help.
Rating: 3 out of 5
Date: 03 2, 2013
While the story was reminiscent of another I've read, I found it interesting, and fairly well told. I had to suspend my disbelief at the servants' continued caretaking of the house and other aspects of the mystery, but it was a good read. I didn't see many reviews that mentioned the poor editing, but it was really a problem for me. Some may have been typos (I instead of It; and instead of had), and a few were common grammatical errors (I instead of me; lay instead of lie), but there were some blatant word substitutions.Words used/words meant:intension/intention (spell check would have caught this one).reveled/revealeddecent/descentrouse/ruse (twice)ala carte/al frescoshinning/shiningrumbled/rumpledcompletion/complexionWe're at/We areOne hopes these errors will be corrected before the book is sold instead of being free.