Review: Storyline same, writing better, editing still bad
Rating: 2 out of 5
Date: 04 16, 2013
The story is good enough that I will read more by this author but there is a repetitiveness that is getting boring.  Certainly a lot of book for the money.  Author needs a new plot.  Writing has significantly improved in some areas, degraded in others.  Now we have mixed tense in sentences.  If the word is a homonym, there is likely an 80% chance the author will choose the wrong word.  Especially if it is to, too, or two.  The author has now created a new category in the English language -- pseudo-homonyms.  The pseudo-homonym is a word that has different spelling, different meaning and is pronounced similarly like layer for lair, track for tract, bloater for blotter...  I suggest the author study Coopers homonym list and find a better editor.  Still a decent read, if the grammatical erros were corrected, getting closer to 4* than 3*.