Review: Porn that should have been proofread
Rating: 2 out of 5
Date: 09 15, 2011
I can get past the fact that half the book, literally, was promos for other works. I can get past the fact there was no character development and to me it was more porn than erotica. What really annoyed me was the evident lack of not only an editor, but it seems to me the author didn't even bother to proofread the story. I rarely pick up on typos, but this had so many I became too annoyed to try to like the story. Not to mention it doesn't seem to be formatted properly. Paragraphs simply run into each other.The reason I gave it a two star instead of a one was the fact it was free and there was potentional for a decent story.