Review: Inane filler ie  discriptions of surroundings, which contribute nothing to the book.
Rating: 3 out of 5
Date: 08 2, 2013
Since I have been reading , I have developed a habit of just leafing through a book to see how much filler is in it. I don't get off on descriptions of everything the author can think of to insert in the script. The color of the curtains, or whether they are gathered or not is more information than I need. My IDEAL AUTHOR is Stuart Woods, straight to the point, no gimmicks or fal de ral. An old hillbilly saying. The concept was good but , there was too much filler. And the filler interrupted the train of thought while reading. I read a hand written book which made these books look bad. Yet NO ONE had the ability to recognize the merit of this book when it was sent to them.  I am becoming dissapointed at  the  material available from a good number of publishers anymore.  Maybe I'll just find another means of entertaining myself in future.