Review: Don't bother.
Rating: 1 out of 5
Date: 11 1, 2012
This story was very....it's hard to describe.It wasn't great.It wasn't even good.Honestly, I'm surprised I finished it.It is so riddled with errors that it was cringe worthy.The author took time to match up the setting to the area and the events of that time period, however, the verbiage and relationships were completely unrealistic to the timeframe. If you are writing a historical romance, you HAVE to be consistent throughout. I felt the use of the word, which is one of my favorite words of all time, f--- was completely out of left field, didn't match up to the situation in the least, and distracted from the scene. Not to mention, the fact that the little virgin was telling him to f--- her like a wh-re was...honestly, I don't have words for how VERY awkward it made the scene and book (I have nothing against sex in books, I actually like sex in books, but this was WAY WTF even for my kinky literary tastes because it wasn't sexy, erotic, or useful, it was just awkward).This could have been a decent western historical romance if the author would have taken the time to actually write a cohesive story that matched the time frame instead of trying to fit his thick ---- and her moist --- into every chapter.The characters....there wasn't chemistry between them, and the female character was annoying most of the time and it made her not a pleasure to read from.I wouldn't read the next book even though I actually liked Train a lot, simply because it was difficult to wrap my head around how disconnected the characters and verbiage was for the timeframe the book was set in.