Review: Too repetitive for me...
Rating: 2 out of 5
Date: 12 10, 2012
I think I reached the end of the road with Terry Goodkind, and it is time we parted ways amicably. The First Confessor is the latest offering from Goodkind, the first book in a trilogy of prequels exploring the great war between the New World and the Old World that lead to the creation of such awesome magic as Dreamwalkers, Confessors, and the Sword of Truth. I wanted to like this book, and there were definitely some enjoyable parts, but in the end this is just a long winded repetitive sermon about the importance of truth and reason. I will not use the review to delve into the ebook debate, there has been plenty of discussion about at a lot of different places (and we talked about it on of the early podcast episodes), but in case you don't know, this book was self-published and is only available as an ebook.The First Confessor, as the title suggests, tells the story about the creation of Magda Searus as the first Confessor. The story opens with a grieving Magda Searus trying to come to terms with the suicide of her husband, First Wizard Barracus. Convinced that Barracus would not have committed suicide without a reason, Magda goes on a fact finding mission where political conspiracies and zombies stand in between her and the truth. She meets the wizard Merritt and they work together to come up with a magic that will put an end to the corruption and reveal the true purpose behind Barracus' suicide. Yeah... there's not much plot here, especially given the size of the book. I'm okay with that - people who have read the Sword of Truth series already have a pretty good idea of what happened during this time, we already know how it ends, so the story has to be more focussed on the journey from A to B rather than building towards a big climax at B. But the journey did nothing for me. It was boring, it was repetitive, it was full of pages and pages and pages of over the top dialogue, and even the new plot threads revolving around the zombies and the conspiracies were painfully obvious and predictable. I remember a time where Mr Goodkind had a deft touch with subtle plotting and well timed reveals, but that has all been replaced with the heavy-handed subtlety of a brick.One thing that Goodkind did get right in this book are his characters. While Magda is very similar to Kahlan, and Merritt / Barracus / Alric Rahl represent the different parts of Richard, we get to see these characters grow throughout the book in response to tough challenges, we get to see they have some depth and complexity rather than just being caricatures of human emotions (like in The Omen Machine), and I think you can really come to feel for Magda and her plight. I think Lothain was a poorly constructed villain, whose only purpose was to reinforce Goodkind's message of people are dumb and can never see what is right in front of them, and the only salvation is to use reason. But all in all, characterisation is a step up from Goodkind's previous two outings.The biggest problem I had with this book was the writing, mostly because there was too much of it. Economy and density of words is thrown out the window in favour of the principle "why use five words when five paragraphs will do". There was so much repetition, so many of the characters rephrasing the same ideas again and again and again, just in case you didn't understand the first time, and so many characters recounting the events that have just passed to new characters they have just met on their journey. There was a scene at about the 50th chapter where Magda summarised the previous 49 chapters with a uprising amount of detail in just a few paragraphs of dialogue. If you want to read this book, you can probably get away with starting and chapter 50 given how good that summary was. The other point I want to bring up is the heavy handed sermon on truth and reason. Goodkind spends a great deal of time communicating these rather romantic notions about letting reason rule your life, and I remember those notions being rather appealing as a teenager. But come on Mr Goodkind, I get it now, you think all people are dumb unless they think like you, at which point they stop being dumb and start seeing the world how it truly is. The message is coming through loud and clear, you don't need to keep beating us over the head with it.The First Confessor is likely to be the last Terry Goodkind book I read, which is sad given how much of my childhood I spent reading and reading his Sword of Truth novels. I felt bored reading this story, I was disappointed at how little risk Goodkind took with his story telling, and I was frustrated with having to read through so many pages after figuring out every major mystery and predicting every major plot point in the novel by 30% mark. I'm not sure who I would recommend this book to. The legion of Goodkind followers will probably have already read and loved this book, the long time Goodkind readers like myself will probably be disappointed by the amount of handholding provided in this story, and people who have never read Goodkind before will probably be disappointed by the weak plot.