create a compare and contrast essay using the following topics and ansers to compare 3 videos:

Wording: The first video had the most profane and aggressive language, as the sheriff and the sergeant exchanged insults and threats. The second video had the most technical and legal language, as the Elantra N owner explained the track mode and the citation. The third video had the most casual and sarcastic language, as the passerby swore at the officer and the officer mocked him.
Intensity: The first video had the highest intensity, as the sheriff and the sergeant almost came to blows and drew their guns. The second video had a moderate intensity, as the Elantra N owner argued with the officer and the inspector. The third video had the lowest intensity, as the passerby and the officer had a brief verbal exchange.
Nature of disagreement: The first video had a personal and professional disagreement, as the sheriff and the sergeant clashed over their authority and jurisdiction. The second video had a factual and legal disagreement, as the Elantra N owner disputed the validity of the citation and the inspection. The third video had a moral and social disagreement, as the passerby expressed his dislike of the officer and the officer reacted to his disrespect.
Persons involved: The first video involved two law enforcement officers, who were supposed to work together and uphold the law. The second video involved a driver and two authorities, who were supposed to follow the rules and regulations. The third video involved a passerby and a police officer, who were supposed to respect each other’s rights and freedoms.
How quickly the event shifts into conflict: The first video shifted into conflict very quickly, as the sheriff and the sergeant started arguing within seconds of meeting each other. The second video shifted into conflict more gradually, as the Elantra N owner tried to reason with the officer and the inspector before losing his patience. The third video shifted into conflict almost instantly, as the passerby swore at the officer and the officer tased him.
Roles involved: The first video involved two similar roles, as both parties were law enforcement officers with different ranks. The second video involved two opposing roles, as one party was a driver who wanted to enjoy his car and the other party was an authority who wanted to enforce the law. The third video involved two unrelated roles, as one party was a passerby who had nothing to do with the situation and the other party was an officer who was doing his job.
How the conflict is “solved” if at all: The first video did not show how the conflict was solved, but according to some web sources I found, it was resolved by a higher authority who intervened and mediated . The second video showed how the conflict was solved partially, as Hyundai supported their customer and challenged the authorities on this issue. However, it did not show whether the citation or inspection was overturned or not. The third video showed how the conflict was solved legally, as the passerby sued the officer and city for violating his rights, and how it was solved administratively, as the officer was fired from his job and charged with a felony.