While reading such books as “The Communist Manifesto” by Karl Marx, “On the Origin of Species” by Charles Darwin, “The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African” written by himself, and “Civilization and Its Discontents” by Sigmund Freud, I was extremely impressed with them. I was challenged with the problem of a sense of “selfhood”, human interactions. I would like to develop my own views, like these authors did, with respect to ethics, metaphysics, society, psychology, and artistic production. I would like to tell my opinion of how these authors bring about a sense of individualism through history and society’s struggles. If we are talking about “The Communist Manifesto” by Karl Marx, it is necessary to mention that some students often have misunderstandings and are wrong in their believes that Karl Marx was a Soviet – Russian and even the originator of Soviet Communism. Marx was an intellectual and a wise person; he came to believe that intellectual activity needed to be connected with actual politics. Marx’s work (mainly through the 1840s) was totally devoted to relating history and economics to matters of psychological and social concern. He developed an important and influential theory of a condition resulting from the increasing abruptness of capitalism and its total dependence upon machines and machine production. There were several uprisings of workers against their governments in 1848, so Marx and his friend Engels were asked to compose the statement of purpose for the Communist League (radical organization). But Engels said in his preface introduction to this book that the Manifesto was “essentially Marx’s work” and that “the basic thought… belongs solely and exclusively to Marx (Marx and Engels, 2002, pg. 35). It is essential to Marx’s theory to assert that all events are pasted in a historical pattern of the evident development of human powers. In order to satisfy their needs societies organize. This determines not only what those societies are actually about, but also shows us the direction and the way in which changes will occur. The dynamic force of change is the conflict between different parts of society, what Marx called the “class struggle”. ‘The Manifesto” actually discusses, how such a revolution could come about. Capitalism arose from the revolutionary actions of a feudal regime that frustrated growth and development. “Manifesto” explains the need for the next revolution, revolution of the mass of workers directed against their capitalist masters. Manifesto has become a world classic. Some of Marx’s sentences became part of the general outlook of the modern reality, even among those scholars and ordinary people who are strongly opposed to Marxism. I think that the power of “The Manifesto” resides in its indictment of capitalism and it also resides in its vision of humanity. Here we can see that “those who had always been the objects of history become its subjects” (Marx and Engels, 2002). I would like also to discuss the “On the Origin of Species” by Charles Darwin, where he establishes evolution by common descent. He points out it as the dominant scientific explanation of certain diversification in nature. He outlines his ideas, sets out the essence and key positions of his theory: “As many more individuals of each species are born than can possibly survive; and as, consequently, there is a frequen