Rem Koolhaas, the controversial Dutch urbanist asserts that the focus of architecture should be on discovering a new form of urbanism, which does not conform to orderly systems (Ouroussoff, 2012). In addition, the new type of architecture should express rare forms with no architectural relation in any way with one another. Rem Koolhaas’ view differs sharply from those of other scholars of metropolitan architecture as he presents a more apocalyptic vision of his works (Ouroussoff, 2011). Koolhaas has created greatly admired iconoclastic buildings. The architect portrays elements of the deconstructivist school of thought in his works. He expresses independent and stylistic contexts of urban developments in the post-modern period. Koolhaas believes that the context of urban planning and development should not bear a resemblance in architectural relations (Koolhaas, 2004). He also notes that cities should not be orderly places, but rather have unique forms of architectural designs. Eisenschmidt observes that Koolhaas has been able to attract attention as he presents diverse unconscious structures of metropolitan architecture by relying on the constraints of the city and conscious development of theories without limitations (Eisenschmidt, 2012). Koolhaas explores city attractions but strives to present new forms of architecture in the explicit modern context of expansion i.e., the grid. His views are complex to reflect modern urbanism in which every block is restricting and accelerating in the same manner. Designs should confine buildings and provide a focused means of exploring elaborate characteristics with distinct particulars. This goes beyond the concept of location to reflect fascinating design concepts. On this note, Eisenschmidt concludes that metropolitan architecture should invite “all forms of urban life and become a ‘city-within-the-city” (Eisenschmidt, 2012). Koolhaas has developed some unorthodox spaces, which include complex forms of architectural designs. These designs are challenging and strenuous to most users. For instance, Koolhaas designed the SoHo in Manhattan. The structure has a massive area that resembles a crater. Shoppers must take several fickle stairs to reach the crater. This has not been easy for many users. Other critics noted that postmodernism has been deteriorating while modernism was out of order. At this point, Koolhaas’ theory presented the unified concept to architecture. Koolhaas aimed to challenge the concept of postmodernism by using abstruse concepts. Koolhaas’ views incorporate several elements of designs, which contribute to design complexities (Croisé, 1996). Urbanists wanted to retain old elements and incorporate several cultures in their works. According to Koolhaas, changes in the cultures of the city and the slow pace of design normally result in a discrepancy in the architectural project (Koolhaas, 2004). He points out that some of the structures meet the basic requirements of a building completely. However, Koolhaas regrets that many users soon forget the concept of functionalism in their structures. Changes and enlightenment have shaped modernism. However, these are unstable concepts, which designers must incorporate in their works. As a result, they may capture contemporary architecture in the period of globa