Introduction In the last 20 years, there has been an enormous boost in the understanding of ethical concerns and problems in the medical career. A lot of such concerns have involved severe and evolving issues like life and death choices during a severe sickness or pain. Until more lately, the dilemmas associated with chronic diseases, and more particularly associated with rehabilitation-based concerns, have received comparatively little consideration. A number of articles started to address ethics in rehabilitation healthcare or permanent care since 1980s (Caplan, 1988; Jeff, 2000). However, there were no actual corrective interactions at that time between rehabilitation professionals and ethicists. The initial key identification of ethics in the context of rehabilitation healthcare, based on Caplan (1988) most likely happened from 1984 to 1986, when the Hastings Facility formed a working team with a view of examining ethical measures of rehabilitation. This was the first time that an organization of specialists who were particularly interested in ethical concerns had explored dilemmas related to constant care and rehabilitation (Caplan, 1988). Since the 1990s, there has been an incredible boost in the number of literature relating to different ethical problems that happen, particularly in the setting of rehabilitation healthcare. The objective of this paper is that of providing an overview of the most important ethical practices in addition to a number of detailed examples of moral concerns that might occur on a daily basis to the rehabilitation specialist. Overview It can at times be rather hard to identify whether specific actions are or are not ethically right. However, if people can concur that certain actions are not right, it will probably have relationships with other incorrect activities. When attempting to identify what such joint aspects might be, people establish moral standards that they then test and utilize across an array of concerns and cases. These standards ought to enable rehabilitation specialists to assume an unswerving position on particular and associated concerns. Three ethical standards serve as an outline for medical morals: kindness, respect for sovereignty and fairness (Gosney et al., 2011). Kindness The word “kindness” signifies charity, the doing of good and humanity. Kindness refers to an ethical responsibility of assisting others, with a view of avoiding hurting them, and to try and balance gains with damages. In the medical context, kindness implies a responsibility of promoting the health and fitness of the patient and to prevent pain, illness, harm and distress (Buhrman et al., 2010). Respect for sovereignty In ethical practice, sovereignty refers to independence, or the autonomy of the self. Individuals must have sufficient knowledge and not be manipulated by other people or by specific barriers that limit options (Jeff, 2000). When medical practitioners respect patients as self-governing, they recognize their right to share opinions, make decisions and take action based on their own values and wishes. People have to be given the ethical right to make their own decisions and implement them (LaDou, 2006). Fairness A person is treated based on the standard of fairness if he or she is handled based on what is reasonable, appropriate or suitable (Thorsten et al., 2006). The theory of fairness involves the query of what is appropriate to whom, and how to share the gains and demerits of living in a certain community (Gosney et al., 2011). Ethical choices are carried out on a day-to-day basis in the area of rehabilitation medication. Some of these ar