This paper looks into the concept of constitutionalism with specific reference to the concept of supremacy of the constitution in relation to the interpretation of other related statutes. But before looking at this, above mentioned it is imperative to examine how the institutions of organized society, law, and governance developed for it is through a knowledge of this that we can appreciate the sue generic nature of the constitution as a document. Thomas Hobbes in this article the Three Treaties of government established that in the ancient ages, the population was scarce and thus the resources were in abundance to cater to the needs of every person. He states that as a result of the abundant resources the freedom of man was unlimited as he had access to everything he wanted even to another man’s property and body. With the increase in population and decrease in resources, the condition of man according to Hobbes became that of ware and tare, where every man was against the other that in such a society there existed no order and the rule of survival for the fittest dominated. The life as described by him was nasty brutish and short. It was later realized that the weak and minority could not as a result survive and therefore the people entered into a social contract so as to surrender some of their rights to the social politic so as to equally distribute such property amongst the dense population. The social politic, which resulted from the social contract, was thus empowered to manage the resources as well as govern the people failure of which the people would revoke the contract. It is on the premise of this that constitutional orders and governments come into realization. A constitution thus came in place as a result of the formation of a social politic as it became necessary to stipulate the relationship between the governor and the governed for it would become subject to abuse. A constitution can therefore be defined as a document that issues generic nature that sets out structures, procedures, and powers of the governor as well as rights of the governed. As such owing to its sue generic nature constitution drafting is not done like any other legislation. It adopts if I may borrow from Harts 1 views a highly advanced art as any ambiguities or inconsistencies that determine the successes and failures of a government. Subsequently, in view of the American Constitution, which was drafted in 1987, the framers of the constitution according to Allan 2 was with the intention of limiting the governor’s powers and securing the liberty of the governed. As such, the framers took into consideration the separation of the executive, legislative, and judiciary besides securing the liberty of citizens so as to balance the authoritative power on one hand and the liberty of citizens on the other. As such one will realize that the American constitution is divided into sections that portray the intention of the framers of the constitution. Article 1 vests legislative power in the Congress, House of Representatives, and senate while Art.2 vests executive powers in the president while Art. 111 vests judicial powers in the courts. It is imperative to note that Art VI. And the subsequent