Introduction In Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries, housing and building sectors consume a third of their energy. This is an accumulation of the energy consumed in the production of construction materials, machinery, assemblies, and the shipment of construction materials. On the other hand, the non-building sectors account for 30-50% of all commodities consumed and are responsible for 40% of solid waste. With the increase in environmental degradation and the effects of global warming, more resources are becoming scarce. Global Footprint Network asserts that it is uncertain if limited resources will maintain human consumption in the near future. To reduce the trail of the built environment, humans must come up with interventions, which will enhance building efficacy with respect to operational logic and a material logic. To attain these developments, practices such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) offer practical knowledge and aid in identifying design alternatives that decrease environmental degradation. In Australia, more construction practitioners and policy makers emphasize on sustainability. It is the duty of the LCA practitioners and relevant authorities to offer appropriate BMCC-LCA information and to ensure that the information can be gathered at the B/C level in an appropriate manner. As interventions are being sought to lessen the effects of construction, Life Cycle Assessment is considered as a goal gauge to evaluate construction plans that evade challenges. To enhance the use of Life Cycle Assessment, construction related decision-making, strategies like the AusLCI projects have been created to expand and preserve the information required in LCA’s undertaking. Based on these themes, this analysis investigates the use of Life Cycle Assessment by evaluating classic and unconventional Australian homes. Methodology ISO defines Life Cycle Assessment as a collection and assessment of the efforts, products and the probable ecological impacts of a product system throughout its Lifecycle. At the present, Life Cycle Assessment has expanded into a key instrument for sustainability decision support. Its importance is yet to be established in accordance with the quality and support it offers. LCA was created when the need for environmental policy became a key issue in Economic Co-operation and Development countries. The chief essentials of the Life Cycle Assessment are illustrated in the study. In general, Life Cycle Assessment is the procedure of evaluating prospective impacts that manufactured goods, procedures, or services have on the surroundings in their over the life cycles. Figures can be used to demonstrate the life cycle organization notion of natural resources. In the figures, energy can be illustrated inflowing into the system, whereas products and refuse can be illustrated exiting the system. The framework for LCA LCA’s technological structure comprises of four mechanisms, namely goal and scope description, inventory study, impact evaluation, and analysis. Each of these mechanisms has a crucial role in the study. They are interconnected throughout the entire evaluation with respect to modern ISO terms. Goal and scope definition This mechanism involves the process of deciding on the scope, aims, and limits of the LCA. At the start of an LCA, the objective and the range of the project should evidently define. The objective must state explicitly the proposed function of the project, the addressees, the expected output, the function to be analysed, and the extent of the project. To define the extent of the project, reference units, system limits and data quality necessities should be addressed. Inven