First, one has to understand what a constitution is, a constitution is a set of rules or principles that defines or shows how a country is governed. Many of the constitutions are written that is, are found in a document. Unlike these constitutions, Britain has its constitution unwritten that is, it cannot be found in any document but the country is still governed lawfully. Britain has her constitution from various sources that include statutes like the Magna Carta, laws, and parliament customs or political conventions. In addition, case laws, which are matters that are constitutional and decided in a court of law and, constitutional experts that have written on some subjects. Britain also has two basic principles, which are the rule of law and parliament supremacy (History Learning Site, 2000, par. 1-5). Britain’s governance is one of the best though it does not have a written constitution. Some rules like the bill of rights, act of settlement, and that of the union are still upheld in Britain. This constitution may seem to contradict especially to other nations who use the written constitution. Britain has surpassed all those odds and has always been stable politically with this type of constitution. Some of the rules are written in different places and not in one document (Dorothy, 2002, par. 4). Over the last thirty years, the rise of the urge for democracy has gone up especially after the cold war and the fall of the Berlin wall. The issue of democracy in many states has led to a lot of criticism of the unwritten constitution in Britain because the disadvantages accompanying it are viewed to make it look bad. Although besides its disadvantages, Britain has used this constitution for so long and it is good democratically compared to many other states. There are various difficulties associated with this constitution. These involve uncertainty whereby, people do criticize its nature of ambiguity. Most people argue that it is not easy to know or understand what exactly this constitution is talking about. Therefore, this nature makes many understand differently and seems as if it is made as they go along. Another issue, is that it is easily changed therefore, those governments that are elected democratically may change it to suit their needs and thus, form a dictatorial kind of government. Many argue that in Britain, it seems that there is no fair competition among parties, as it is only the Labor party has taken control. This is seen as part of a constitution that is highly flexible and one that can be changed any time the party wishes (John, 2006, par. 3-4). This may lead to a change without considering the interests of the people but only favoring those people in power. In the unwritten form of the constitution, there seems to have weak people’s rights protection because there is nothing forcing the government to abide by the law and, it seems they do it at their own will. The critics say that this is a serious issue because; a government can come into power and be so strange that it may start violating human rights by not protecting them well. These are most of the criticism mainly given by individuals who normally think that an unwritten constitution is dictator