In elections, retention of power /office is the major pivot point in politics. Political scientist like Jonathan Katz, Brian Sala, Sarah Binder and Eric Schickler have critically studied the electoral system and political rules established by individuals who have interest in managing electoral offices. For instance, in their article, Katz and Sala cite electoral motivation as a route, which compels the politicians to study and concentrate on policy making thus, retaining their positions in the electoral offices. While Schickler and Binder note that, the establishment of a collective institution is in line with the majority members in the House a law, which undermines the rights of the minority group. Therefore, the House of Representatives or congress members enact laws, which alter or amend the institutions to favor their electoral incentives thus keeping them in power. The electoral office has a specific time limit after, which the members have to face the voters. Depending on the electoral laws established by the members, they stand the chances of either losing or retaining their positions. Due to the aforementioned statement, there is a strong association between the electoral motivations and institutional changes in the House. According to Sala and Katz, favorable institutional changes have a direct correlation with the reelection process (22-23). The first institution to undergo reforms is the electoral system. The legislative members are law or policy makers who have the power to enact ballot changes that will ensure they fulfill their electoral motives. The first electoral/ballot reforms is the issue of party identification. Intuitively, the legislative members have to retain their positions in reputable parties in order to have a higher chance of maintaining their office. For instance, Sala and Katz analyze the party policy by giving the popularity of the Democratic Party over the Republican Party. To maintain its popularity the democrats keep in mind the welfare of the poor, who are the majority group in the region. Consequently, the decision gives them an upper hand in the retaining their electoral offices. The cohesiveness of the party members and the subsequent policies relates directly to the electoral motives. In addition, the lack of privacy in the voting process favors the reelection of a member. Furthermore, illiteracy and the use of already printed ballot papers restrain voters from altering the position of any member. Therefore, the hierarchy of the office, level of personality and party affiliation are the major institutions, which determine the retention of a political office. Therefore, the independence of most political institutions or structures is in line with the electoral motivations of the political members holding office. By drawing their facts from other political analysts like Cain, Ferejohn and Fiorina, Sala and Katz implicitly elaborate on aspects such as ballot reforms, parties and other institutional structures that favor the reelection of members. In her article Sarah Binder asses the issue of majority and minority in the house especially when enacting house laws/rules. She focuses on the element of the leading party and the opposition party in the House in relation to