Thesis The thesis of the authors is that the requirements of international governance necessitate the enhancement of innovative diplomacy. This illustrates the rising intricacy of the numerous concerns affecting the international community and the flow of influence amid its essential players, which are non-governmental, as well as governmental (Cooper, English, & Thakur, 2002). Main Arguments People and nations across the globe encounter inhumanities of inconceivable degrees. Moreover, there are rising conflicts between nations because of international multilateral design. Relationships involving dissimilar players are vital to deal with the rising new imperialism and mercantilism planned by the wealthy and strong countries that aspire to control international deals (Cooper, English, & Thakur, 2002). For a serene existence that enhances global democracy, the center of power, as well as the effect, requires changing. Nations require reinforcing local abilities to allow individuals at the grassroots to deal with challenges arising from globalization; globalization does not have to eradicate localization. Safeguarding global tranquility and human progress to attain a better existence in a secure world ought to be supported to a greater global strategy making level to include non-governmental and governmental players as they operate in conjunction with national governments to build up and execute different plans. For instance, the World Bank and IMF should work jointly with governments in the middle and low-income nations to eradicate poverty through supporting development initiatives. Through the provision of loans, recommendations, and training to the public and nonpublic sectors, the IMF and World Bank could eradicate poverty by strengthening the people (Khanna, 2012). In this regard, other non-governmental organizations (NGOs) could as well chip in to offer support. Unfeigned multilateralism as well as trade that enhance fairness and support ought to overcome the overriding unilateralism, in addition to protectionism, with the purpose of reducing the increasing states of international anxiety and ambiguity and the World Trade Organization (WTO) is in a good position to support such endeavors (Rasche & Gilbert, 2012). WTO works to strengthen international trade and governance to ensure healthy transactions and provision of an environment for negotiations and resolution of conflicts. The authors of the article also focus on the United Nations (UN) and the emerging new international relations within it (Cooper et al., 2002). On this note, they concentrate on human security concerns that encompass security, development, peace, and authority (Cooper et al., 2002). The supported argument is the change of diplomacy from war to development that is rising in international establishments. Innovative management on concerns of international governance is achievable. Supporting innovative diplomatic plans that are geared towards supplementing the structure working at the UN (the society of the wealthy and mighty that has become unrepresentative of the inhabitants across the globe) will greatly enhance international relations. The approaches of naming and shaming of criminals act as an excellent manner of blunting illegal endeavors of the wealthy and mighty nations. The International Criminal Court ( ICC) plays a key