Introduction In his article ‘It’s a Flat World, After All’, Thomas Friedman (2010) starts by explaining the origin of the phrase “it’s a Flat World, After All’. Further, Friedman (2010) discusses the usage of the expression, and the different meanings derived from the use of the same slogan. At first, Christopher Columbus used the phrase in his report to the Queen, in efforts to explain his voyage to India. From the time of Columbus, Friedman remarks that the phrase has found a new meaning. The phrase is no longer used relative to the geographical physique of the globe, but rather on the fact that many dynamic changes in form of administration, business and communication around the world has made the world to appear flat (Friedman, 2010). According to Friedman (2010), several changes have contributed to the perception of the globe as flat. Ranking high in the list is the technological revolution, which according Friedman has enhanced dynamic changes in restructuring our lives in a way that has never been experienced. Changes and Perception Through scientific revolution, the world has realized the discovery of simpler ways of solving most of the problems that used to take generations to deal with. However, unlike the way Friedman perceives it, knowledge was not discovered at the same time with technology. According to Tsoukas (1997, p.2), what technological revolution has so far managed to change is the way in which people perceive knowledge in terms of information. Tsoukas (1997), remarks that the modern generation is lured into reasoning out that Knowledge just as information exists in isolation of the partaking individual. A distinctive characteristic however between late contemporary cultures is the momentous degree to which they are reliant on knowledge for their performance. Contrary to how information was perceived in pre-modern civilization, knowledge now tends to be comprehended as information, which comprise of objectified, theoretical illustration (Tsoukas, 1997). According to Friedman (2010), many of the consequences associated with technological advancement are well exemplified in the effects of globalization. Through globalization, Friedman (2010) notes that it is possible for a CEO of a multinational corporation located in the US to hold a conference with all the heads of the company’s subsidiaries in the world. Similarly, the same chief Executive Officer can liaise with as many company’s customers and distributers while still at the comfort of his office in New York. Friedman (2010) further notes that this has been made possible through video-conferencing, an achievement that has culminated from advanced technology by the modern generation. Power of Technology In his article ‘It’s a Flat World, After All’, Thomas Friedman (2010), conjures an image that the world has single handedly been transformed by the modern state of-the-art-technology. He asserts that all these technological changes have actually been realized in the last 20 years or so. Nevertheless, according to Nathan Rosenberg (1979) in his article, “Technological Interdependence in the American Economy”, Technology on its own can never achieve such a feat. Rosenberg (1979, pp.25-50) remarks that invention, should rather be the world attributed to the cu