Introduction Sepsis is a health issue that affects people of all ages and leads not only to adverse outcomes and complications but also to death. Fortunately, innovative interventions can improve this situation. For instance, it is possible to use Meditech/SIRs tool (system inflammation response) for patients of a rehab unit. Identifying whether the elderly are likely to obtain the most benefit from this intervention, it is significant to find out the possible ways of preventing sepsis, types of infection that may lead to it, the most common symptoms, risk populations, and duration of life after diagnosing the illness. Antibiotic Treatment According to Shebabi et al. (2014), sepsis can be caused by various infections that are usually treated with antibiotics. Unfortunately, they do not always work effectively and improve the patient’s condition. What is more, in some situations, their intake turns out to provide an adverse influence on people’s health. The authors believe that a low procalcitonin cut-off on antibiotic prescription can have positive effects on the situation and currently, its value is underdetermined. Conducting a quantitative research study with random sampling (which reduces possible biases and is advantageous for the research quality), they managed to find out that even though some improvement is observed, it fails to reach the expected 25% reduction in the duration of antibiotic treatment. Such findings prove that there is a necessity to continue the investigation and find out those tools that can reduce mortality in patients. Existing inconsistencies are faced because healthcare professionals and scientists are not yet aware of those interventions that will undoubtfully provide positive results. Lack of evidence is the main issue currently, but further research can provide an opportunity to identify the best intervention. Early Intervention Mohajer and Darouiche (2013) support the necessity to utilize those diagnostic methods that can provide an opportunity to diagnose sepsis at the initial stages so that the treatment can be started as early as possible. Just as Shebabi et al. (2014) they are focused on the opportunity to reduce the duration of antibiotic treatment. Mohajer and Darouiche (2013) emphasize that time management is imperative, so there is a reason to try using Meditech/SIRs tool for prediction and diagnosis because other assessment methods are not accurate enough to ensure positive health outcomes for all clients. They are mainly interested in hospital-acquired device-related infections, which is critical for healthcare systems topic because they are meant to improve people’s health instead of worsening them. This limitation is not a disadvantage, but an opportunity to discuss the issue of sepsis in a narrowed environment with more detail. Unlike their colleagues, Bate et al. (2013) discuss infections and sepsis in patients with cancer. This population is at high risk of mortality that is why those professionals who focus on their well-being do not usually pay much attention to sepsis, which is a great drawback. However, people’s condition after anticancer treatment is rather vulnerable. As routines prevention of sepsis can hurt their health, it is better to utilize those tools that can make diagnosing more accu