Teen pregnancies are associated with a variety of negative outcomes for both the mothers and the infants among which there are preterm births, low birth weight deliveries, maternal anemia, and other adverse birth outcomes (Hueston, Quattlebaum, & Benich, 2008; Leppälahti, Gissler, Mentula, & Heikinheimo, 2013). The researchers all around the world attempt to address this problem providing timely prenatal care to the pregnant teenagers. Adequate prenatal care is anticipated to minimize the mortality and morbidity of the adolescents, address the harmful effects of early pregnancies, improve newborn outcomes, and in turn, enable a significant saving of future costs (Ayoola, Nettleman, & Stommel, 2010; Christiansen, Gibbs, and Chandra-Mouli, 2013; Hueston, Quattlebaum, & Benich, 2008; Vieira et al., 2012). Background The article by Hueston, Quattlebaum, and Benich (2008) attempts to answer the question concerning the amount of cost savings that could be realized if pregnant teens were given adequate and timely prenatal care. To measure the costs and savings, the authors explore the perspective of Medicaid, the organization that insures early pregnancies in the US. Hueston et al. (2008) used a strategy of comparing the costs of child care without any prenatal care practices and those of the mothers who were provided child care starting with earlier or later months of pregnancies. Hueston and colleagues were not the first group of researchers investigating the benefits and outcomes of prenatal care based on the time when it was delivered. The works by Leppälahti et al. (2013) and Vieira et al. (2012) investigated the adverse obstetric outcomes in teen pregnancies in Brazil and Finland accordingly. The Finnish study demonstrated that the majority of teen mothers registered in Finland were socioeconomically disadvantaged and required prenatal care (Leppälahti et al., 2013). The authors concluded that prenatal care provided at the earlier stages of pregnancies was more beneficial regarding the outcomes (Leppälahti et al., 2013). The study conducted in Brazil that observed multiple teen mothers showed the efficiency of prenatal care. The authors found that the adverse outcomes associated with the young age of the mothers were found only in teens, who lacked adequate prenatal care (Vieira et al., 2012). The study by Christiansen et al. (2013) explored prenatal care as a midstream intervention multiple health issues caused by preterm labor and low-weight deliveries. This research shows the need for the upstream approach to address teen pregnancies educating the adolescents about their health, nutrition, and lifestyle (Christiansen et al., 2013). The work by Ayoola et al. (2010) maintains that “the financial and emotional costs of poor newborn outcomes to families and society in the United States are enormous” (p. 550). The authors also find that almost 50% of all the birth defects and disabilities are associated with premature birth and low birth weight (LBW) (Ayoola et al., 2010). Initially, the time of initiation of the prenatal care was viewed as the failure of the teen mothers to report their pregnancies, but soon the scholars admitted that they never took into consideration the fact that some women may be simply unaware of their pregnancies for a while (Ayoola et al., 2010). The researc