Describe the difference between introjected regulation and integrated regulation for autonomy and relatedness Integrated regulation describes the identification with the value of an activity so that the activity becomes an element of an individual’s habit. The assimilation of regulations within the self makes integrated regulation a core aspect in an individual’s evaluation of his or her beliefs. The goals for integrated regulation illustrate that individuals believe their habits emanate from causes within the self, which characterizes integrated regulation as a highly autonomous form of motivation. Relatedness has minimal effects on integrated regulation because individuals reject behaviors, activities, or rules that supposedly offer pride and rewards at the advantage of interesting and enjoyable activities. Internal motivation increases confidence and competency in tackling challenges because success enhances the perception of self. On the other hand, introjected regulation describes the engagement in a behavior mainly because of the feeling of self-worth. Individuals adopt the regulation on behavior without fully accepting the regulation as their own. The representation of ego and preservation of self-esteem are prevalent introjections as individuals pursue the preservation of self-worth. The characteristics of introjected regulation illustrate that it is a controlled motivation because the influence on an individual’s behavior originates outside the self. Relatedness plays a key role in influencing introjections because individuals want to enhance their ego, self-esteem, and importance by complying with obligations that eliminate guilt, fear, punishment, or humiliation. Introjections have minimal effects on competency because individuals adhere to rules mainly due to fear of punishment or desire for reward, which cause anxiety in undertaking tasks and difficulties in dealing with failure. What steps can you take to move toward a more integrated regulation type of motivation? The first step in improving an integrated regulation is to expand the elements of internal motivation to ensure consistency in positive feelings regarding the performance of diverse tasks. The acceptance of external motivations that concur with my values and beliefs would ensure the preservation of my autonomy. The interpretation of the meanings of the selected external motivations will ensure that the motivations do not interfere with my values and transform them into the natural elements of integrated regulation. The second step in ensuring unity in my integrated regulation is to eliminate behaviors that increase susceptibility to the demands for compliance with rules that describe the outcome of behavior. Rejecting the adoption of external controls, which arouse anxiety, fear, and helplessness will facilitate the pursuance of my goals while ensuring that my composure does not suffer due to the fear of failure in the context of the community’s expectations. The third step is the acceptance of responsibility for my behavior and activities in promoting the well-being of other people. Acknowledging the limits of my rights and the rights of other people will ensure that my dec