How Do Toxins, Pollution, and Climate Change Impact Poor and Black and Latin Communities? There seems to be controversy about environmental justice linked to the demographics of individuals living in proximity to areas used in undesirable ways, for example, land waste sites and landfills. However, the extent to which these sites accommodate trash varies and is not directly correlated to risk exposure. Whereas some researchers use the magnitude of pollution release as opposed to closeness to a hazardous site to define exposure, others utilize the dispersion of pollutants model to comprehend the link between exposure and population. As a result, the current paper focuses on disproportionate exposure to contamination based on race while focusing on the Blacks and Hispanics as influenced by disproportionate siting, coming to the nuisance, market coordination, and discriminatory politics. Implications of Modelling Choices on Spatial Relationships between Polluters and Residents Modeling choices on the spatial relationships between polluters and residents have resulted in discrepancies when examining this issue of environmental justice in regards to disproportionate exposure to toxic waste. Hence, there has been a measurement error of environmental justice due to exaggerations of study variables. One such hyperbolic correlation involves the use of aggregate data using smaller units of analysis. While there are arguments that a larger unit of analysis might override the seemingly racial inequities of exposure, contact would be more accurate if indicators of risk and entities of analysis were used based on the maximum distance where exposure is felt. On a different note, environmental justice is eminent in terms of health outcomes as ethnic minority groups are shown to have poor health outcomes compared to their majority counterparts (Banzhaf et al., 2019). It is for this reason that the correlation between pollution exposure and race becomes a pertinent issue because these ethnic minority groups are near hazardous land sites; thus have more adverse health conditions. Theory and Evidence for Four Possible Mechanisms Govern Patterns of Disproportionate Exposure to Pollutants The association between pollution and race has not yielded significant results because employment, and non-residential patterns, seem to influence settlement in cheap areas due to the governing force of economic welfare. When socioeconomic factors are controlled, race prevails as a variable correlated with pollution exposure. Taste-based discrimination by firms suggests that as businesses seek to control labor, land, and transport costs, they are likely to target poor neighborhoods and cheap labor. Moreover, their disproportionate siting in areas predominantly occupied by the people of color is perceived to be intentional on their ends as a way of protecting the whites from pollution. As a result, they establish their firms in spaces inhabited by ethnic minority groups from where they can gain more profits due to passive lawsuits and more returns. Even though every household strives to live in a desirable neighborhood, its ability to settle in such a setting depends on the budget. However, since people of color lack