The discipline of psychology is one of the most vital for the relationships between human beings wherever they are situated. The analysis of what a predicted action or way of thinking should follow is a great thing for every individual due to the significance of a man’s psyche. Some deeds of people which are the same in their repeating character are constantly irritating others due to the point of annoyance. The explanation of different events and things has several points, with regards to psychology, which can be admitted as components of social, behavioral and physiological nature (Brody & Hayes, 1995). The artificiality in psychology deals with many factors which are caused by the activities of a man. This aspect of social sciences has invaded the field of science during the last years of scientific development. Here ethical approach is rather discussed within the artificiality. Scholars try to maintain and implement different models of estimation of this or that phenomenon by means of social psychology and its approaches towards the social problems. In this case “artificiality is necessary if ever one is to clear up what causes what, because the only way to get rid of confounds (extraneous factors that might complicate interpretation) is to strip phenomena down to their bare essentials.” (Abelson, xii, 2004) The explanation of psychological relations with other disciplines deals with the philosophical background of its roots. In this paper the artificial nature of artificiality falls into the relations into social, organizational, and abnormal branches of psychology. The imitation of natural things throughout synthesized ones is a standpoint on which the notion of artificiality keeps strengths in psychology. Dealing with the societal affairs human beings create some correlations in their minds to facilitate the essence of this or that situation. The communities in the era of high technologies tend to create a sort of artificial reality and existence due to many technological amenities. This is abnormal effect which causes such-like patterns to be avoided in the peoples’ characters. When communicating at the workplace people do not consider the real state of things and circumstances under which they are working. Thus, the researchers strived further in order to maintain the boundaries of a scientific research known as a “breakthrough model”. The breakthrough model type of scientific research and the principle of connectivity are the co0ncepts which need observation in this part of the paper. First, it is important to point out the notion of these two extents throughout their interpretation in terms of psychological approach. With regards to one of the most eminent researchers in this field of discussion, Keith Stanovich, the principle of connectivity is a notion which outlines the need of new theory to explain new data in complex with current old ones (RUF, 2009). In this approach there is a connection of new theories between each other. On the other hand, the breakthrough model leads its roots towards the Einstein’s theory of relativity and also known as the Einstein syndrome. This model urges to change current accepted and used knowledge due to phenomenal and extra-ordinary theory which puts several corrections in the scientific thought of a defined time. Keith Stanovich and other researchers connect all the progressive achievements due to their interaction in the historical cut, like a building of a house wi