Introduction Japan and the United States are both leading countries with a strong economy. Various factors contributed to the development of such nations, and each of them faces its threats and challenges. Analyzing policing in the United States and Japan allows one to find similarities and differences, which gives a better understanding of the way systems work and will enable one to analyze the impact of criminal organizations. There are two systems by which the country can be defined: the honor-based and contract-based social systems. The main difference is the principle that drives each of the systems. For instance, the desire for wealth and power characterizes the honor-based system, which can be classified into two categories. The research that classifies honor-based societies distinguishes loud and quiet honor-based social communities (Herrman 5). Honor-based societies can be classified as “quiet,” “intermediate,” and “loud,” where those terms describe the conditions of dignity to a particular extent. (p.5) The researcher finds an indirect correlation between dignity and loudness, stating that the louder the expression of the society, the less pride it possesses due to the more significant declaration and definition. However, scholars argue that “all dignity is quiet dignity,” demanding the justification for the loud one (Herrman 6). Quiet cultures tend to avoid risks and conflicts, promote collective honor, rely on mutual respect and help, and understand the dependence of each participant in the group on the whole. Success and achievements are more predominant for loud traits; therefore, they possess competitive characteristics. According to such distinguishment, Japan relates to the mixed group, as it promotes both cooperative and competitive traits, where the American expression is described as exaggerated and over-dramatic. Such separation allows one to better understand the necessity of both countries to make aggressive economic moves and have well-developed systems. Main body The other system is a contract-based system that has the purpose of establishing peace and security. This model implies that “citizens give up some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of the state in exchange for protection of remaining rights” (Schuck 70). In American politics, social arrangements have a significant historical impact. This advances the notion of serving people by protecting them. Such studies originate from Plato’s early studies, even though Thomas Hobbes was the first person who expanded the term. One of the principles is popular sovereignty as it promotes the idea of power within the population, which states that the government must be based on such a policy or not exist at all. An honor-based system fosters cooperation and competition, which is different from the contract-based system as it is more oriented to providing benefits to society relying on ethics and human rights. However, both systems serve the community, whether by establishing cooperation or setting the protection by the government. The reason for such communities to exist is similar for both Japan and the United States, as criminal organizations are mainly concerned with power and financial gain. It contradicts the social system that is based on dignity and ethical codes. Organizations in both countries cause a threat to society, mainly to the law, but also help to benefit particular individuals and structures. Even though beneficial terms may remain, such organizations still encourage violence, corruption, and national boundaries exploiting. FBI is also concerned with the rise of advanced