Introduction HCI describes Human-Computer Interaction . It is a scope of study that explores how individuals view and ponder about computer related technologies, and also investigates both the human restrictions and the features that advance usability of computer structures. Management information structure considers technology as a device to realize certain objectives and insists on organizational effects of assorted appliances. Conversely, HCI regards the relation of humans with computers as a dialogue. It also insists on the significance of interactive properties. This implies that the computer has properties that resemble those of humans. When investigating the issues regarding communication in a computer, it is crucial to concentrate on its shared and behavioural discipline (Lee and Sundar, 2010). There are also structural properties of user interfaces, which include modality and interactivity, which affect human, cognitive, sentimental and behavioural responses. HCI in the scope of communication involves perceiving at it as a resource or an interactive channel. The psychology of man-computer relation is primarily founded on the locus of an individual’s bias towards the computer. When individuals perceive the computer as a resource, they relate socially to the equipment itself. However, if they view it as channel the individuals’ social reactions are not inclined towards the equipment but are impacted by it. Current technological developments have broadened computer boundaries. This has been accomplished with the establishment of varied properties of social prompts. These social prompts entail; natural lingo use, ability to interrelate, individual, social functions and anthropomorphic managers. Computers are frequently viewed as a spring of information, as opposed to small channels of messages developed by another person. Although people are alert that computers produce upshots as programmed, they appear to become unaware to the asocial property of communication. Individuals consider utilizing the similar social heuristics with regard to inorganic equipments as they do in person-person relations. With this standpoint, computers are perceived as social performers if not allocated complete humankind, which induce in users a varied collection of social properties (Nass and Moon, 2000). Relationship between HCI had Human-Human Interface Many studies have illustrated the operation of social tenets in HCI. However, direct relationships between HCI and individual-individual interface have disclosed some variations between the pair. Participants articulated enthusiasm, made sociable remarks, and disbursed more attempts to achieve the duty when believed that they relating with another individual rather than machinery. Variations between HCI and interrelations among humans become apparent, when comparatively unrestrained communication actions are in query. For instance, persons are likely to utilize relationship inclined assertion and respond to their partners’ impact attempts when relating with humans than computer partners. There are similarities between face to face interrogates and human-computer ones in the sense that in both individuals exude similar emotional responses. Th