Introduction Terrorism has been in existence in many parts of the world for a very long time. Many people have perceived it as violence especially due to the presence of suicide bombings and inhumane attacks by terror groups. In effect, people have been forced to live in fear and always stay alert due to the uncertainty of terrorism acts. However, despite many groups claiming responsibility for these actions, they are yet to be nabbed and thus still remain at large. Many of the governments have continued to further terrorism in the name of revenge or protecting their citizens (Marsh, 2005), yet the main sufferers are the innocent in society. In his article, Sardar considers terrorism to include anyone who lives comfortably at the expense of others, a definition that would suit everyone who makes the lives of others miserable and unbearable. However, this is subject to refute since all these governments do is seek supremacy and control the world. Different perspectives Sardar (2005), considers those who consume too much, lead an unsustainable lifestyle, exploit non-western economies and hide it as free trade, and want their lifestyle followed as the real terrorists. This means that terrorism starts with peaceful individuals through the injustices and inhumane acts that seem small and justifiable; thus the peaceful man is also a terrorist, the only difference being his perspective. Those who bomb and kill people through acts of terror normally tend to express their oppression by the governments. They tend to express legitimate issues through a way that makes the governments listen to their cries, a phenomenon that amounts to, according to Sardar (2005), conscious terrorism since they don’t have any other way of reaching the government that is oppressing them and denying them justice. The ‘peaceful terrorist’ on the other hand is filled with greed, a superiority complex, and an un-quenched desire to rule and dominate the whole and entire world; this leads to invincible terrorism. The peaceful terrorist views himself as having the right to be what he is and hence continues to dominate the world. This gives the two sides of both terrorists who have different ambitions and purposes which must be met. As Sardar (2005) notes, the conscious terrorist kills without discrimination while the invisible terrorist kills en masse. There are too many reasons that make Terrorists be ‘us’. Despite the acts of terrorism being aired by global media, the peaceful terrorist has his share of the blame. He hides in a cocoon trying to defend his acts on the basis of freedom, trade, and democracy, while he still believes in his innocence. Barr (2004) describes how the definitions are customized to suit the needs of the ‘us’ community by defining terrorism as “the systematic use of violence as a means of intimidating or coercing societies or governments.” This means that they can continue with their acts of terror without being labeled terrorists. He gives an example with the war and invasion of Iraq as a war to fight weapons of mass destruction, a war that has never been dubbed as a terrorist act while it continues to mess the whole country and its citizens who live in abject poverty. The real meaning Blood flowing, people dead, property destroyed and millions injured can not be compared to the explanation by either Sadar or Barr. This is more terrifying and outright terrorism which need not be defended.