Complying with the basic ethical principles and at the same time succeeding at an increasing pace in the global economy is a rather challenging task; with every new opportunity for improving the living standards of the company members emerging, the necessity to address the needs of every single stakeholder becomes more and more tedious. As the case of PharmaCARE shows, adherence to ethical postulates may easily be disregarded by the members of an organization once their priorities shift to financial gain and materialism. Although the case of PharmaCARE seems hopeless, the issue can still be resolved with the help of a major change in the organization’s ethical debilitation through the introduction of a different leadership approach and a set of strong values for the staff to comply with. The patients of the PharmaCARE Company are obviously the key stakeholders in the specified scenario, seeing that they were the ones, whose rights were infringed by the company’s despicable actions. However, apart from the customers and the target audience, the scenario in question also incorporates the organization and the local authorities as to the obvious stakeholders, as the former was the instigator of the ethical issue in question, and the latter was supposed to investigate the case based on the existing regulations. When viewed from the basic tenets of the human rights theory, the fault of the PharmaCARE Company becomes obvious. Justifying their actions by their corporate ethics that was flawed to the core, they infringed the key human rights of the local residents, specifically the right to live (Ionesco, 2012). On the one hand, the company did not deprive the local residents of their resources personally; on the one hand, the organization members created the premises for the local frauds to deceive their neighbors and deprive them of good food and proper living conditions. The organization, in its turn, enjoys the benefits that have been taken from the local people in a dishonest way, which is an obvious infringement of basic human rights, specifically, the right to live a decent life (Kangaslahti, 2013). There is no need to stress the fact that the ethical values of PharmaCARE leave much to be desired. More to the point, the organization needs urgent changes, without which it will not last long in the global economy. First and most important, it is essential that the PharmaCARE Company should get its priorities straight; to be more exact, the organization will need to reevaluate the significance of its key stakeholders. Consequently, the strategies for keeping the stakeholders in question devoted to the organization will need to be designed. As far as the loyalty of the target customers and the lenience of the media are concerned, the organization may upgrade its reputation towards a more socially acceptable one by improving its current set of ethical principles and putting the well-being of the stakeholders in general and the local residents in particular. The introduction of a more appropriate set of ethical guidelines is, therefore, the second change that PharmaCARE needs to suffer so that it could regain its positive reputation. Upholding to a set of more rigid standards is most likel