Inkscape versus Adobe Fireworks Both Inkscape and Adobe Fireworks are vector graphics editors, which enable a user to realize a series of multifunctional tasks. However, Adobe Fireworks offers either the possibility to create bitmap or raster images. Both graphic editors have been initially designed to create web-images. The interfaces of both editors are quite user-friendly; however, we have to mention the relative complexity of operating Inkscape. Apart from the shortcuts of the Inkscape editor, which are not designed for the users’ average needs, Inkscape is not likely to ‘organize’ the images in a convenient way. In its turn, Fireworks is not very quick to start. The tools of Inkscape and Fireworks are quite similar, containing the useful function of dissembling the image into layers, the basis of which is the child layer. They offer the user a wide range of options varying from the most simple to the most complex. On the contrary to the Fireworks, however, Inkscape has its exclusive library in order to produce graphic images. Both Fireworks and Inkscape have a positive point of saving the files in format PDF. Open Office versus Microsoft Office Open Office is the free product, entitled to be used, modified, and improved by a user, while Microsoft Office is the ‘monopolized’ product, which is incapable of personal modification, and its profits from sales are the inducement of its development. This fact makes it clear that schools should be more likely to practice Open Office rather than Microsoft. Further, the suites bear considerable differences in interfaces – Open Office is much simpler and more convenient to use, whereas Microsoft appears rather complex, offering a wider range of functions and options. Switching attention to the tools specifically, Microsoft Office has a default grammar-checker, which is considered to be more reliable and extensive than the one of Open Office, which is not implemented as a default. Moreover, Microsoft suggests a greater variety of formats and different opportunities to view the document. Besides, this suite has the advantage of creating different types of diagrams – Smart Art feature, unlike Open Office, which does not have such an option. In its turn, however, Microsoft files are considerably larger in size than the Open Office files. GIMP versus Photoshop On considering several kinds of GIMP tutorials, one has to but draw the conclusion that not all of them offer explicit and understandable models of work. This set of tutorials gives the user opportunity to visually observe all steps of acquiring a particular skill in GIMP, unlike the majority of other tutorials, which, in their own turn, perform these steps separately. This subtlety remains quite inconvenient as far as there is often a need to switch, come back to the former action, and muse on it, which is better with the placement of this information directly on one page. The positive thing about the majority of the GIMP tutorials is the division of GIMP skills acquisition according to the level of complexity, which enables any average PC-user, in particular any pupil, to get easily acquainted with work on GIMP. The latter is not too overwhelmed with functions, unlike Photoshop, which would be quite unreasonable t