Today everyone is becoming concerned with his environment. People have come to realize that their lives are tightly knit to their surroundings. This has been made clear by growing knowledge of green environment even deep in the villages. However, scientists and other scholars have contradicted overtime in defining environmental justice. Concerned environmental bodies and other activist groups still have diverse definition for environmental justice. As a result, justice in environmental terms has become too relative. Schlosberg believes that all the terms has only led to confusion with little help, he says “Yet all of these developments in justice theory, very little has been applied in environmental justice movement” (Schlosberg, 2007, Chap 1 Excerpt). Several researchers have not come to terms when creating distinction between environmental and ecological environmental justice. However, understandably ecological justice is associated with nature and distribution of factors influencing it, while environmental justice focuses on equity of distribution of resources among the social classes. In addressing the disparities to Iles concludes that, “If both environmental and ecological justice can be addressed using a broad language of distribution, recognition, capabilities, and procedural justice, then a larger frame can be established that link both set of concern” (Illes, 2004, p. 92). Environmental justice is supposed to protect our environment through sustainable development; however, industrial development and economic growth have surpassed man’s capability to manage his environment (Schlosberg, 2007). Currently computer wastes have become a nightmare to environmental activists. In developed countries, governmental regulatory measures and groups concerned with environmental health to some extent have achieved control over these wastes. In Europe, for example, computers’ component recycling programs has become useful in curbing environmental pollution. Iles notes, “The European Union, along with Japan and Taiwan, has enacted laws obliging electronics manufactures to take back obsolete technology for reuse and recycling” (Iles, 2004, p. 98). Pressure has also been put upon computers’ designers to develop systems that are environmental friendly. Consequently, bans have also been employed as a method of fighting poor application of e-way in several states as well as manufactures. Developing countries, on the other hand, are facing difficulty in adopting technological development and managing its environment pollution consequences. Since many people in these countries are unable to purchase top manufactures designers, they opt to import used and environment harmful components from developed nations. Worse still, these nations have not come up with policies of managing these wastes. Asia, for example, has become one of the huge importers of these low quality designs. These are the same trend in almost all the developing nations (Illes, 2004). Despite the trend, the current data lacks the necessary support needed for action and the success of any mitigation will depend on future research as Iles states, “more data needs to be compiled on transnational flows of all forms of materials used in electronics and wastes, not just computers; and on the locations and act