Introduction Ethical behavior is the requirement for the civilized communities or groups of people. In this case one should be aware of the fact that different approaches fit the initial task of having a clear idea about what it is like to feel and do like the code of ethics demands. This issue is really striking for contemporary fast-growing world. People struggle for their place under the sun. They do everything to keep up. However, it is rather significant just to pay attention to the norms and rules of ethical points. This paper is devoted to illustrate a comparative analysis between two well-known kinds of ethical guiding among human beings, i.e. APA and ACA ethics guidelines. One should not mix them in the course of researching. The question is that these two demonstrate different approaches as well as methods for identifying ethical treatment or manner in behavior. On the other hand, making people more ethical and conscientious about their personal feelings and their purity is normal for a civilized society. It also illustrates how individuals differ in their characters and abilities to go well in groups. Therapist and counselors are contradicted in this study in order to delineate all pros and cons in how they used to provide treatment. Both groups are shaped with the feature of professional attitude toward their work and specialization, in particular. APA and ACA also promote a united vision on how to move forward a good therapy to make people well physically and mentally at once. These points are highlighted during the process of APA and ACA ethics guidelines comparison. Methodology This study is developed by means of comparative analysis as per APA and ACA ethics guidelines. The scope of the research is patterned with particular points on the main features about each set of ethical guidelines. The audience for the research is wide due to the social character of the main ideas stated in it. Results The research shows that the APA ethical guidelines are directed for human beings and animals. This division is considered with highly intensified activities of different social organizations that struggle against cruel and unfair attitudes toward people and animals, as straightforward representatives of the wild. Hence, the main guidelines for human research in its APA ethical characterization are:   * Informed Consent;   * Deception;   * Coercion;   * Anonymity;   * Risk;   * Debriefing Procedure (BX Science, 2008, p. 1). In this respect one should be aware that people participating in different researches should state on their consent to participate, first of all. It should be of one’s own free will. The research should have some features on hidden sense in its main aims. This is why deception should not bear extremely hurtable character for participants. No coercion should be used, because it will not get distinct and true results afterwards. In accordance with APA ethics every participant should be guaranteed being anonymous as for personal results. People taking part in the research should not be at risk of mental or physical threats. At last, participants should know of the main purpose and results of the research. The whole observation of APA ethics touches upon expressly therapeutic aims that need to find out some explanations on a deeper level of a human’s consciousness. However