In economics, organizations that operate in oligopolies markets compete by trying to steal market shares from one another. Therefore, instead of competing by lowering prices, the kinked demand curve points to an understanding that the strategy does not work since every organization reduces costs (Von, & Quartieri, 2016, p. 65). Companies utilizing this strategy often compete using a factor directly affecting profit and hence the quantity being sold. The Cournot model finds application when organizations produce standardized or identical products and, thus, do not collude (Von, & Quartieri, 2016, p. 65). The assumption by France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom is that the rival’s decision maximizes profit. Duopolies, on the other hand, operate by the understanding that companies compete by the produced quantity. The assumption by the Cournot duopoly model is that two organizations move simultaneously, having similar market demand perspectives and having good knowledge of the cost functions of each rival (Von, & Quartieri, 2016, p. 66). With this, firms choose how to maximize profit through their output based on the belief that rival organizations make similar choices. For the U.S., the decision to support Boeing lies in the revenue diversification the former has over the latter in the American region. For France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom, Airbus is preferred due to its revenue collection abilities, which heavily rely on civilian aircraft, helicopters, and commercial. That makes up 80 percent of the revenue collected by the four countries, while Boeing does not offer the European countries civilian helicopters, and its commercial airplanes make up 60 percent of its revenue (Duddu, 2020). Cournot’s duopolies model of economy assumes competitors operate by the understanding they compete by the produced quantity. When analyzing the difference between Boeing and Airbus, in America, both manufacturers offer products in the same categories, comprising uncrewed aircraft, commercial aircraft, space systems, and military aircraft; Airbus is differentiated by civilian helicopter quantity (Duddu, 2020). The Airbus portfolio product, constituting civilian helicopters, sets it apart from Boeing and includes several models ranging from twin-turbine heavy-lift rotorcraft to light single-engine produced by Boeing. Further, the two companies offer a majority of commercial aircraft; however, the most famous aircraft models constitute the Airbus A320 aircraft family, while Boeing has the 737 family. The United States supports Boeing primarily based on its manufacturing of missile systems categories that Airbus does not produce. Despite lacking direct offerings in the developer of the European missile and holding a 37.5 percent stake in the region, the competitive edge held by Boeing is in ballistic missile space (Duddu, 2020). While the manufacturer MBDA holds direct offerings in the European missiles space, Boeing has a competitive edge over it due to the ballistic missiles space. The United States supports Boeing since the company has been in operation since 1924. In the 54 years the company enjoyed a monopoly, the country relied on Boeing in its air transport. The reliance by the U.S. on Boeing in