Introduction There has been a common perception which seems to be a fact that an attempt to establish regulations on the usage of cars generates protests. The protests are raised by motorists who feel that such regulations are infringements on their freedom of movement. An insight into circumstance about cars however gives an indication that there is something special about cars that drive the users into protesting against any element of control on the way they use their cars; there is an “errotic effect” (Diekstra and Kroon 153) associated with cars that people cannot do without. This point of view is generated by the fact that motorists make sacrifices in using their cars and leaving many available and more reasonable options. Cases such as people maintaining the usage of cars instead of “bicycles or train” and people spending a lot on cars while failing to satisfy some of their basic needs have been noted (Diekstra and Kroon 148). There are also reports that as much as every Dutch is pledging commitment to environmental conservation, almost only a quarter of vehicle owners are willing to reduce the extent to which they use their cars. Politicians have also been identified to be reluctant to enact stern regulatory measures despite the fact that a high number of people die every day in the European Union countries from road accidents. There is therefore a force of unwillingness to enact or accept regulation on usage of cars (Diekstra and Kroon 148). History of Driving Behavior The preference for a car over the other affordable means of transport such as the train started long time ago. Following his journey from “Berlin to Italy and back in an open Adler Phaeton” (Diekstra and Kroon 148) in the year 1902, Otto proclaimed that a car was better that a train (Diekstra and Kroon 148). He later revealed more of his reasons for preferring a car. According to him, there was more freedom when travelling by a car that was not realized in other modes of transport; “The car increases human power and speed to such an extent that it also constitutes an increase in a qualitative sense; with the aid of the car, man is capable of claiming territory practically anywhere in the world” (Diekstra and Kroon 151). The restrictions in a train that are, for example, not experienced in cars include fixed time tables and the closed nature of the train vessel. Another historical advantage that cars are credited for is the social class identity that the use of train had undermined. Trains mixed every traveler in the system and that seemingly did not please the noble classes. As cars then emerged later at prices that could only be afforded by the very rich, it was associated with social superiority bringing back the social stratification that was formerly felt. Time however realized the proliferation of the motor vehicle industry with companies such as General Motors, Ford, Volkswagen among others coming up to offer diversified brands of vehicles that were affordable by the other lower classes in the society. The status associated with cars has however not diminished as some brands like Mercedes and BMW are meant to distinguish classes in spite of the fact that an individual is on car wheels and the power associated with it remains to be a