Literature review It is evident that preventable diseases infections in hospitals have posed a threat to medical practitioners in both developed and developing countries. However, in the developing countries the rate of getting infections in medical facilities has been enormous because of lack of proper antiseptic scrubbing solutions. In places where there are solutions, they do not meet the required standards to alleviate these preventable diseases acquired through poor patients handling practices. Topics on prevention of infectious disease through proper use of antiseptic solution in hospitals have attracted attention of many researchers, academicians, medical professionals, and health organizations to study the best way to address this issue. As a result, different antiseptic scrubbing solutions have developed, whereas the knowledge on preventing the infectious diseases has tremendously expanded. Different researchers and writers have expressed divided opinions on this topic. According to Warrell, Cox and Firth (2003), the existence of hospital acquired or nosocomial infections are prevalent to both patients and the medical practioners. As a result, they suggested an epidemiological tool to assist in establishing the infections soon after admission of patients. It is possible to study these infections within 48 hours after admission based on the manifestation of the infections on the patient. However, different [patients are likely to manifest these sign at different time given that some diseases such as hospital acquired Hepatitis B camouflages signs for infection even for some months after the readmission of the patient. Infections can be in various categories, for example, the iatrogenic infections acquisition as a direct consequence of a therapeutic intervention such as insertion of a urinary catheter (Block, 2001; Wiener-Well et al., 2011; Russell, & William, 1999). On the opther hand, there is optimistic infections in which organisms attack people with impaired defenses. Endogenous or autogenous infections emanates from the patient’s normal flora, whereas exogenous infections result from exogenous infections, an attempt for this differentiation is necessary because of important implications for control it have. Therefore, there should be proper antiseptic scrubbing solutions and process to avoid the spreading of these infections. Damani and Emmerson (2003), atributed the increased rates and nature of these infections from the rapid changes in health care provision in hospitals. They criticized the tendencies of doctors to make early discharges, especially the surgical patients who might have contributed to an under assessment of the burden of nosocomial infection. Study by Clark, Richard, Robert and Barry (2004), revealed a need to identify and distinction of isolates causing nosocomial infections to make a close comparison of the microorganisms. Invasive multi-resistant organisms, such as MRSA, often require infection control measures to prevent their spread, and so minimize the use of expensive, sometimes toxic, antibiotics required for their prophylaxis and treatment. A publication by Larson (1995), for the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. (APIC) presented a tren