Introduction It is not necessary that in order to address evil, we must concern or involve by any means or techniques the concept of religion or Godly existence. A philosophical theory of evil can be expected to address many questions of meaning and value that pertain us to think in multiple dimensions at a time like thinking of “evil” a concept worth preserving or ways to limit the existence of evil beyond the merely bad or wrong. We can also assume those situations that blame a human being to become evil. Whether an intention or a motive, a deed or an institution, nobody is safe from the potentials evil possesses on us. However in order to distinguish evil from morality, we are bound to obey a supreme universal power which we name as ‘God’. God is our supreme benefactor, we owe our existence from moment to moment, and our powers and pleasures, our knowledge and desires, to his sustaining power. And everything that everyone else does for us they can do only because God sustains in them their power. We owe him so much by way of expression of gratitude and service; and, it is supererogatory good to do more for benefactors than duty requires. And since God, seeking our well-being and theirs, want us to be good, to fulfill our duties to others, and to do things for them and ourselves beyond the call of duty, it will become doubly our duty and doubly good to do so. What distinguishes good deeds from bad ones is then the satisfaction of fulfilling duties. Many of us even believe that by fulfilling our worldly duties we are able to get rid of evil. The notion ‘service to humanity is the service to God’ is what makes humans think that all human wrongdoing to other creatures is also wronging God. For, first, anyone who misuses a gift from a benefactor wrongs the benefactor. God gives us life and all our powers and knowledge. If we use them to hurt someone else, we wrong God also. And secondly, just as anyone who wrongs a child wrongs the parent who brought him into existence, nourishes, educates, and loves him, so wronging another creature is wronging God whose creature they are. Wronging God invites evil and from there the problem of evil starts. The Philosophy of Evil Philosophical theories address questions of meaning and value in the attempt to clarify fundamental or important concepts. One way to go about this is to identify commonly asked questions, such as these, and use them to develop an analysis. We can start by defining evil with a simple abstract definition, not expected to be controversial, and develop it by amplifying its basic concepts, addressing such questions as these and placing the theory in relation to others influential in the history of moral philosophy. According to my analysis, evil refers to all the deeds that are either tolerable or intolerable for the purpose of culpable wrongdoing. Philosopher Card (2002) believes that evil in nature upholds the power to cause harm to the nature and severity of the harms, rather than perpetrators’ psychological states, this is what distinguishes evils from ordinary wrongs (Card, 2002, p. 4). Evils possess the authority to affect human lives but in a negative manner whenever and wherever possible, he tend