In recent years, leadership has become a captivating idea for a substantial number of people. Inspired by the idea that effective leadership will inevitably affect their professional, social, and personal lives positively, they are looking for information concerning the characteristics of a successful leader (Northouse, 2018). However, there is no single way to attain leadership ability and organize other people to achieve goals. Leadership is investigated by scientists in many contexts using both quantitative and qualitative methods of research, and a significant number of leadership models are currently defined. In this essay, the case of a local hospital is examined with the definition of Wassmiah’s style of leadership, its advantages, and its disadvantages. Transactional Model The leadership model chosen by Wassmiah to provide an effective work of a local hospital corresponds with the transactional leadership model of management. This model is characterized by the cooperation of a leader with followers and the distinct reward system in which employees’ efforts are encouraged (Northouse, 2018). The transactional leadership implicates the leader’s control over managers’ activities and negative feedback or corrective criticism in the case of a mistake (Northouse, 2018). These transitional model traits may be commonly found in Wassmiah’s management as the leader practices the reward system to encourage employees’ positive behavior and boost their productivity. In case of any problem, Wassmiah gives instructions to staff and points out the followers’ inaccuracies in short order if the standards of work have not been met. Advantages of the Transactional Model There are significant advantages of transactional leadership supported by Wassmiah’s case. First of all, the reward system provides a highly substantial level of efficiency. In Wassmiah’s local hospital, this system encourages the followers’ accurate and active duty performance. Another benefit of the transactional model is expected outcomes and goal attainment due to the sharp differentiation of labor and the manager’s coordination of working processes. In the described case, the division of labor provides a successful performance of the hospital without duplication of work and conflicts between colleagues. All work is divided into small, achievable parts between all members, and every employee knows his or her duties. Disadvantages of the Transactional Model However, the transactional leadership model of management has a distinct disadvantage that plays a significant role in the potential decrease in performance capacity. Despite the effective differentiation of labor and targeted tasks, well-managed workflow, and the absence of conflicts in a team, transactional leadership does not promote the personal interest and motivation of followers to achieve results beyond expectations (Northouse, 2018). There is no working cooperation between a leader and followers on equal terms, and the transactional model creates a hierarchically structured system with the reward system that is defined as the main implication for workers’ motivation. Without rewards, followers may lose any interest in their work and av