The movie “Extreme Measures” (1996) is about Dr. Guy Luthan (Hugh Grant), a British emergency room doctor who treats homeless people in a hospital in New York City. When one night a patient dies from weird symptoms, no one takes notice except Dr. Luthan who investigates and finds shocking details of a private medical research program that has been taking place in the hospital secretly. In the investigation, he discovered that the famous neurologist Lawrence Myrick (Gene Hackman) had been doing some research into the healing of spinal injuries by kidnapping homeless men off the streets of Manhattan and forcefully taking them to the hospital. In a bid to prevent Dr. Luthan to drop the case about the illegal research, Dr. Myrick ransacks his apartment and plants some cocaine near his bedside. Consequently, he is arrested and his profession is almost being ruined. Dr. Myrick is shot and killed unintentionally by a FBI Agent, and Dr. Luthan goes to Dr. Myrick’s daughters for help to complete the research in the right way. As the plot of the movie proceeds, Dr. Luthan is seen to be encountering inner conflict. He seems to be at cross roads in determining which one is more important between conscience and moral duty, or between minor or major issues in the medical research. It is true that nobody should suffer for the sake of preserving human dignity and the happiness of individuals. As such, I agree with the moral philosophy of Kant that maintains that everyone has an equal worth and deserves equal respect from other people. According to Kant, the ‘good will’ always does the right things because they are right. The idea of a good will is closer to the idea of a ‘good person,’ or ‘person of good will.’ The word ‘will’ is discussions to concern by the nature of rational agency. Kant insists that the good will is good even if it does not achieve the targeted results. The basic idea he emphasizes is that the possession of a will makes good person. It is in a way ‘determined’ by, or makes its decisions on the basic of the moral law. Kant’s main intention is to underline the moral value of motivation and its realization at least through the presence of a “good will” in a person. From the point of view of the philosopher, a good will always keeps remaining good. Even if an individual fails to be commanded by his good will, what he does remains a good thing unconditionally. In addition, Kant considers a good will as a unique goodness that is able to produce the result it intended to produce. A good will is still valuable by itself, because its existence is not confined to a certain unique personality. Through the principle of Kant, Myrick’s illegal and immoral research in the movie “Extreme Measures” cannot be considered as a good will because it is not making the decisions based on the moral law. Further, it is not justifiable to use people as guinea pigs in a research without their consent. On the other hand, the philosopher Jimmy Bentham holds that the relevant consequences people face are due to the happiness created for everyone affected by their action. He says, “Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as what we shall do. On the one hand,