This author sensitizes the society on the effectiveness of boot camps. This essay concurs with LaVaughn (2010) idea that emphasizes that military discipline is vital for reforming behaviors of delinquent youths. Though the solitary confinement have been associated with high rates of suicide, the author advocates that camp boots act as rehabilitation centers hence control certain crimes among youths. The author is also convinced that there are negative impacts associated with such camps. Bottcher and Michael expounds on the effectiveness of using boot camps programs through evidences derived from a random experiment conducted in notable institutions. The authors note that boot camps have been used since early 1990s to punish both delinquent youths and juvenile offenders. From the complete outcome of data collected, it is definite that more than 75% of people who are confined in the camps have their behaviors reformed completely hence the programs have been proved to be effective Doris et al (2001) examine the experiences of juveniles in boot camps and their impacts on the lives of victims. One can analyze that boot camps are effective since they help to instill discipline in young people. Survey reports have shown that confinement of juvenile in boot camps did not cause depression or anxiety. The authors of the article also discuss numerous adjustments and changes that can be implemented in boot camps to make them more effective. This author concurs with Jeffrey and Daniel (2001) idea that administrators of juvenile justice systems should improve and overcome failure facing boot camps. From a careful analysis of this article, it is apparent that boot camps are ineffective in dealing with juvenile crimes. The reason for this claim is that though the camps have gained a considerable popularity, it is not the best viable alternative since they are punitive and can lead to development of more deviant crimes. The authors in this article give their personal views on the fact that ensuring juvenile justice has become a challenge. This is because new policies especially in US have been implemented recently and have made the justice system more complex. However, their research has shown that efforts have been made to prevent, foster restorative features and increase rehabilitation in boot camps hence making the juvenile justice system more effective. The authors in this article address the community on public policies governing the juvenile justice system. They argue that though boot camps are punitive, they are rehabilitative and help to eradicate non-secure behaviors that have resulted to increase of crime among youths. From the article, it is evident that though boot camps are effective, people should take time to identify the root cause of juvenile crimes. Moreover, policy reforms will help to increase the effectiveness of the camps. The article presents a statistical analysis illustrating the drop in crime rate among juveniles confined in boot camps. The authors acknowledge the study conducted by Bottcher and Michael (2005) arguing that boot camps are the most effective in punishing juvenile offenders since they help to control crime among delinquent youths. However, the article has revealed that mentoring as a major strategy used to reform behavio