Introduction The process of implementing and evaluating public policies is best understood by considering the process of making public policies as an operation that has several sub-processes merged together (Ridde 2009, p.939). A policy is a combination of aims and specified activities that can help end a certain problem once implemented (Lyhne 2011, p.321). Alternatively, Ridde (2009) defines a policy as the things/actions that the government has deemed right and or wrong for people (p.939). In case the government makes a decision to do a particular thing that is of community interest without success in the achievement of the desired outputs, policy analysts make an incredible effort to unveil the reasons for the failure of the policy. One approach for doing this is to scrutinise various deficiencies in the implementation phase (Ridde 2009, p.939) and the policy formulation phase. In case deficiencies are found in each phase, it means that the policymaking process negated some vital aspects that would ensure that every step taken in the formulation and implementation phases is consistent with the desired final goal and objective of the policy. The purpose of this paper is to introduce policy evaluation as an ample component for inclusion in the policy formulation and implementation phases for making public policy. Failure to include it in both phases makes it difficult for the people formulating and implementing the policy to detect certain deficiencies. Such deficiencies may truncate into the failure of the policy to deliver the anticipated outcomes upon full implementation. This paper is divided into two main sections. A description of the implementation and evaluation components of the public policymaking process as separate entities is presented first. This step is then followed by the analysis section, which discusses the policymaking process as being composed of policy implementation and evaluation phases running simultaneously. The advantage of integrating the implementation and evaluation phases for making public policies will finally be addressed. In conclusion, the paper will hold that the implementation of public policy cannot be separated from its formulation or its evaluation. Description Implementation of Public Policies Once policies are formulated, the next phase involves their implementation. Public policy implementation refers to the exercising of a specific policy decision as directed by the law, court, or any administrator’s prescriptions (Mazmanian & Sabatier 1983, p.149). It takes two paradigms, bottom-up and top-down. The bottom-up approach is initiated by singling out the chain of people who take part in offering any service to each or all local areas by interviewing them on their ambitions, schemes, actions, and contacts (Sabatier 1986, p.32). The bottom-up approach holds that public policy implementation process is inseparable from the formulation phase (Matland 1995, p.147). The roles of administrators and politicians are also considered as critical in the success of the formulation and implementation of the policies from the paradigms of the bottom-up approach. Contacts are then deployed to develop various networks aimed at aiding in the identification of national actors, local, and even regional a