The problem of hate speech on the Internet is acute and will not fade away in the coming years. The Internet is increasingly intertwined with disasters and racially motivated crimes with each passing year. Researchers understand that criminals and destructive actors inclined to crime are constantly looking for support on the Internet. The darknet remains a very unexplored field where individuals considered undesirable on trendy media can escape. Nevertheless, people rebelling against liberalism, feminism, and equality in race, gender, and sexual orientation find their refuge everywhere. Many people want to support them or show interest in their comments and great essays left on the Internet. Due to several cultural and psychological factors, the actors of the hate speech seem attractive and exciting. Their ideology seems to be very emotional to many people, and with this ideology, they attract attention. Hate speech is not a marginal phenomenon, prevalent only at the bottom of the Internet. Hate speech is ingrained in new media, including the official print press. One of the significant reasons hate speech on the Internet and in general in the media is quickly and firmly entrenched in its latent resolution for most people. A kind of permission for such a language is obtained by achieving the effect of pity. Most of the recipients of this speech are expected to feel sorry for the speakers first and then agree. In particular, people who hold far-right views are motivated by self-pity and self-compassion (Ganesh, 2018). Thus, they give themselves permission for unprecedented aggression since they do not consider themselves the primary and initial aggressors. The other, a stranger, diffuses aggression and falls under the protection of the liberal movement. Women once became breadwinners and took away jobs, forever taking away the fundamental status of a breadwinner from men. People of non-traditional sexual orientation and transgender people scoff at family relationships. Arabs, Asians, and African Americans are taking our jobs and women away from other Americans (Ganesh, 2018). An actor, an orator, is always unhappy and is forced to fight for his well-being. Hate speech is arguably one of the most controversial and sad paradoxes of democratization on the Internet. Some people also interpret freedom of speech as a manifestation of their attitude towards specific population segments by incorrect methods (Badwi, 2021). After the ban on one platform, hate speech actors are forced to develop their ideas on another and then on a third platform. Different online media and social networks have unique codes of communication and etiquette. The moderators of Twitter and Facebook quickly ban bullies on any grounds. It often lends itself to general criticism from ordinary people and Internet users. Criticizing such people would be appropriate, perhaps if there were no real parallels between the crimes and those that preceded them on the Internet. Research indicates that angry comments about migrants are on the rise shortly before attacks to overcome the migrant crisis. This paradox requires detailed consideration since various comments are against and in defense of such an interpretation; words are free. The arguments against this are that people who use hate speech to e