Introduction Abortion has always been a controversial subject for Americans. This issue clashes with the dominant faith of many U.S. households, which is why some of those in power make continuous attempts to limit or completely take away a woman’s right to end pregnancy. After all, it is evident that people are extremely passionate about their beliefs, promoting them to fight for what they believe is right with much passion and dedication. Thus, the actions of Texas officials signing by into action Senate Bill 8, known simply as the Texas Abortion Law, are understandable and them smiling for a photo while doing so could even be regarded as admirable if not for the fact that the law is an assault on women’s reproductive rights. In the month of November, justices of the Supreme Court demonstrated skepticism regarding Senate Bill 8. According to numerous reports, they scrutinized the structure of the law itself, which created a sort of “bounty system” for those willing to sue others for assisting with abortion after fetal heartbeat was detected (Gonchar, 2021; Moore & Chamberlain, 2021). With the Supreme Court signaling such skepticism and hinting at allowing abortion providers and activists to challenge the law, the interest in the constitutionality and ethical adequacy of Senate Bill 8 is rightfully justified. The purpose of this paper is to examine the structure and implications of the Texas Abortion Law in order to demonstrate its flaws. Senate Bill 8 is an unconstitutional law, which attempts to manipulate the loopholes in the United States’ legislation to restrict women’s reproductive rights, while disregarding their actual biology. Background In order to move further into the discussion of the primary issues surrounding the Texas Abortion Law, it is imperative to delve deeper into what Senate Bill 8 actually is and how it functions. As of September 1, 2021, abortion at a point when the heartbeat of a fetus can be detected, which is roughly 6 weeks, is considered illegal (Cohen et al., 2021). This is the direct result of the enactment of the Texas Heartbeat Act, or simply Senate Bill 8. The Act prohibits abortion once the heartbeat can be detected with no exceptions for victims of rape, domestic abuse, or incest (Cohen et al., 2021). The only exception, which would allow a woman to get an abortion past the point of detectable heartbeat is a medical emergency. There is added controversy surrounding the status of the law, although there is common ground in admitting that it provides the authorities with the ability to ban abortion de facto, without any of the risks of the de jure. The Texas Abortion Law took effect only after the Supreme Court decided not to enjoin it. September 1 has truly become a point in history of women’s rights, abortion legislation, and reproductive health as, prior to this day, abortions had been allowed after 6 weeks: up to 20 weeks, in fact (Cohen et al., 2021). The enactment of the Bill and the fact that the law actually went into effect only followed an existing trend in strict abortion legislature seen in other conservative states. Texas Abortion Law: Anti-Privacy and Pro-Secrecy Although the entirety of the Texas Abortion Law is a subject of much curiosity, the most interesting part about it is ar