The end of the XX century displayed very serious issues in the development of human society, in terms of the situation with environment, policy, economy, etc. People now have faced the results of their development, and become more and more concerned about maintaining balance in everything, thus, starting to implement measures of sustainable development. First of all, it is necessary to give the definition of sustainable development. The brief “standard” definition “when judged by its widespread use and frequency of citation” is the one given in the 1980s by The Brundtland Commission, and run as follows: “ability to make development sustainable – to ensure that it meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (Kates, Parris & Leiserowitz, 2005, p.10). But with the course of time, the meaning of sustainable development widened and now it embraces three “pillars of sustainable development: economic, social and environmental” (Kates, Parris & Leiserowitz, 2005, p. 12). And now world public is to reinforce “economic development, social development, and environmental protection – at local, national, regional and global levels” (Kates, Parris & Leiserowitz, 2005, p. 12). So now people understand the necessity of sustaining these three “pillars” in complex, without prejudice to any of them. But it is not so easy, for some countries, though consuming natural capital quite rapidly (sometimes faster than it can be replenished by nature) have no economic capital to advance sustainable development in their region; and it goes without saying that such countries cannot afford to contribute into the global sustainable measures. And it is sad but the majority of countries in the world cannot afford to maintain balance in their environment, economy, and even life standards. One of these countries is Uganda, which faces grave problems in each of the “pillars”: for example, most of its 22 million population (which is reported to double by 2020) is involved in agriculture and suffer from the soil erosion and decrease in soil fertility, which people of Uganda cannot overcome without the help of world public. But the gravest problem in this region is the lack of potable water. The whole country suffers from the declining quality of water, which can be surmounted by implementing a thoughtful governmental water policy. There is a precedent when policy-makers of Chile succeeded in providing thoughtful measures to advance the water supply in their country, and in thirty years the problem was solved (Domper, 2009). But, of course, Ugandans will need the outer help of the world public, which will help with knowledge and money. But it is necessary to admit that not only do developing countries damage the environment; the most of natural capital is used by the developed countries, and the biggest pollutants are developed countries as well. But a very good example of considered policy in terms of sustainable development presents Canada. Despite the fact that Canada is regarded as a country of forests, beautiful landscapes, and virginal nature, it faces a lot of environmental problems: pollution, acid rains, greenho