Currently, European Union is in a state of crisis following differences in political ideologies. Consequently, divergent political agenda has left citizens in dilemma and unable to choose political leader whom they can support. This crisis might interfere with leadership system and structure in future unless it is adequately addressed (Cramme par 1). Besides, leaders ought to devise effective strategy of unifying Euro-zone. Additionally, leaders should also employ credible and workable plans that will positively improve dwindling economic trend in this region. This will enhance social and economic stability in the entire region. So far, citizens seem to be worried that this crisis might lead to long term negative impacts in political institutions. However, the same leaders have relentlessly attempted to respond to this crisis by identifying its root causes. Recent empirical research has also indicated that reforming political systems per se is not enough to avert looming crisis. Indeed, there is urgent need for radical reforms that will usher in a new era of political dispensation (Rachman par. 1). Different leaders hold varying perspectives on how to tackle the crisis. For instance, Nout Wellink, bank governor from Dutch, suggests that institutions in European Union should be political based (Rachman par. 2). According to opinion of the majority, lack of a common political institution that will enforce use of a common currency has by far and large, contributed to the crisis. There has been misinterpretation of the root cause of the crisis. Nonetheless, the actual causes are both culturally and politically motivated. For instance, Lack of unified political system has made nations like Germany and Dutch advocate for fixed Euro zone bonds and tax systems (Rachman par.3). Leadership crisis experienced in European Union is rooted to the difference in personality among key leaders. For instance, the German president has always been indecisive when it comes to acting over common issues (Cramme par.2). Moreover, the council president has a low profile over sensitive matters and also bearing in mind that the crisis has reached to a point of international concern, he urged his colleagues not to be too pessimistic to handle the crisis (Leigh par.1). Moreover, divergent views and opinions among leaders hinder formulation of effective strategies to terminate the crisis (Cramme par.3). In recent years, European Union has been invaded by similar crisis. However, the fate of the Union lies on hands of leaders who are supposed to exercise ethical leadership skills and competencies to save Euro zone from this regional disaster. Behind every crisis, there are proponents who are usually after fulfilling their own individual and selfish interests (Larive par.1). Dramatic shift of ethical values among leaders has played a significant role in worsening the crisis. Egoistic nature of respective stake holders of the Union must be discouraged for the common good of people being served. This implies that any successful bit of European zone lies on the valued moral obligations and ethical behavior of its leaders (Cramme par.2). It is high time that leaders stepped up thei