Introduction The changes in the mode of power and authority in the recent world fall into different perspectives that account for the comprehension of power in society. The ideas of Michael Foucault should be analyzed to develop an idea that will cater to the author’s propositions about governmentality. Power and politics also justify how it largely affects and determines the societies of industrialized countries in the world. Primarily, political power is depicted through the existence of alternating alliances in a varied authority through projects that involve many economic activities. Indeed, power is not seen as a big deal for the policies which will cater to the policies about the productivity of the citizens. When talking about personal autonomy, it does not points out the contrast of political power but signifies a part or a role in its practice. As such, people or each individual is not the main subject of the power but are just actors who play significant roles for the application of power throughout. Accordingly, it is said that the link between powers is the actions and how each action is developed from another one (Rose and Miller, 1992). The relationship thus accounts for the profound social nexus and is not treated higher than society as an extra framework that has a far-reaching perspective that a person can think of as a goal. For some instances, being in a society is like living in a manner wherein actions developed from action are probable and is more likely seen to be constant. In addition, according to Michel Foucault (1982), abstraction depicts a society that has no relations in power. Hence, it makes the political analysis to be a vital part of a society to assess the conditions and strength of the country. Discussion Exploring the deeper meaning of power through the modern world of practice and exercise of power and authority in a society, firm perspectives of power largely account for the principles of Michel Foucault. A society should then be comprised of power relations and serve as the heart of societies. The state is commonly attributed as not having a harmony or has low performance and thus abstraction occurs. In recent times, what matters is the governmentalization of the state which is proposed by Foucault (1982). He primarily illustrates a way of analyzing political power through governmentality. It wanted to put a highlight on a specific way of thinking and acting in the flesh in response to the trials to be able to administer the wealth, health, and welfare of each individual. Foucault denies the idea that since the past years, the way of prevailing power and looking for instances to deliver power profoundly has gotten supremacy and has been incomparable with any other kinds of power in a political manner (Focault, 1982). It was associated with a huge number of a set of tools that accounts for government and a multifaceted system of knowledge and fundamental principles which pertain to the information regarding the government and the channels of how it is practiced and to whom it will be practiced (Wickham, 2006). With the idea of political power, Foucault recommended that an individual should keep away from giving much importance to the dilemma of t