Introduction We are split and divided in our neighborhood, religions, and schools of thought. We are distinguished by income, ethnic groups, origins, tribes, traditions, backgrounds, and nationality. When personal contact lacks, communication and more importantly an information gap prevails about groups that do not hold the aforementioned attributes as we do. The foremost difference first lies in the genders, then among the male and female comes the sub-difference of the elite class and working class, or the white privilege in contrast to the non-white. And the classes keep on going from ethnic minorities who feel ignored and disregarded in a certain society, to gays and lesbians who often seem to be hidden or appear as disguised. This space is filled with what we absorb and come to know from home, and also from what we study at our schools. But the most influential and indeed a typical mine of information or misinformation, and stereotypes is the mass media that convey and communicate to the public, various ideas, implications, and stories that constitute the invisible patterns and ‘truths’ about the groups, castes, genres, and classes in which the humans are divided. (Holtzman, n.p.) Television is said to be the most influential source of depicting these classes. It can either provide a means for independent thoughts and assessments by viewers that would possibly lead them to take apart the seeds of bias or be taken apart by them. The paper identifies the role of television in creating and maintaining class differences among society. The negative portrayal or the underrepresentation of certain groups affects them as being overlooked and unnoticed, but however, has been greatly considered by analysts and journalists. In class divisions, the paper starts with identifying the core difference between genders – the male and female – which out of the two is focused more and which one is underrepresented, how television covers their issues from domestic lines to the much wider professional world, from their respective involvements in the political fields to their appearances in commercials. The context also focuses on the physical appearances of the two, how are they looked at, whose views out of the two are more valued and considered, and what is the stereotypical representation of the two. The paper then moves on to the underlying issue, that of the working class, and how are they played down on television. This has been covered with respect to the working class both men and women. The paper highlights the exaggerated importance in the television coverage of the middle or elite class in contrast with the understated status of the working class, how the sense of rigid class separation and difference prevails in the minds of the middle and affluent class who degrade them with a total unsympathetic attitude towards them. For this, mainly television and other media are responsible and we will see that in the paper as to how. Moreover, whiteness and white privilege in television are highly prevalent, henceforth the paper focus then shifts to the class difference between the white and the non-white, which covers all, male and female white along with male and female non-white. We shall define what is whiteness and white privilege, how it is dealt with in television, specifically how it is emphasized and