Communication style is a predisposition to a specific way of communication, orientation, and readiness for it, which is manifested in the way a person is inclined to approach most situations. One of these styles, the most ancient and well-established, is ritual communication. The purpose of ritual communication is to maintain contact with society and to reinforce the image of oneself as a society member. It is necessary to have a partner for this style of communication because ritual communication is, for the most part, a tool for maintaining social contacts. People make many connections and conversations in this style, which from the outside seem meaningless since, at first glance, they are entirely uninformative, unfocused, and do not have any result. In the presented model of communication, the partner is just a necessary attribute, not the only one and easily replaceable; moreover, a person’s specific individual features are not significant. The ritual communication style has various unique characteristics and forms several cultural phenomena. The ritual view of communication is one of the communications theories that was proposed by James Carey. As Carey (1989) claims in his book, “a ritual view of communication is directed not toward the extension of messages in space but toward the maintenance of society in time” (p. 18). The presented type of communication involves communication without the transfer of valuable information. People use rituals in everyday life, for example, when they ask friends how they are doing or discuss the weather. Researchers also discuss several examples that confirm that the transfer of information is not significant during rituals. Firstly, people often attend events at which they can meet their friends and relatives, whom they have known for a vast amount of time. Most likely, these people maintain communication with each other outside these events. Therefore, the group of people knows the latest life events and circumstances of the invited. However, this type of gathering still exists and is widespread among most cultures and populations; therefore, such a situation can be called a ritual. Even though everyday routines have no information value, most people consider their implementation to be necessary. For example, if a person asks someone about how they are doing, they usually come up with a standard answer. If they do not answer in the usual way, and they share details from their life or begin to talk about difficulties and problems instead, then such behavior can cause an adverse emotional reaction from the interlocutor. A similar pattern is observed when a person does not come to a birthday celebration of a relative whom they have known their whole life. Other guests may condemn this person because the relative violated their usual ritual. Similar behavior may be observed among many groups of people – if they do not receive the expected reaction when performing a ritual, their social patterns can be damaged, and they can react negatively. Carey (1989) explains such harmful and even aggressive responses by the need for confirmation, which means that when performing established traditions and necessary social