Racial formation theory developed by Michael Omi and Howard Winant determines race as the socially constructed identity involving economic, political and social influence. The theory was first introduced in their book “Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s” in 1986. To better understand the social formation theory primary the term of race should be revealed. Before racial formation theory appeared, the race was considered as constant and immutable concept. The racial belonging was determined according to the physical and genetic measures. Omi and Winant argue that the race is not a constant concept but a dynamic and volatile social aspect, thus, deconstructing the definition of race primary considered. Omi and Winant refused to study the race in terms of biology or education. Instead, they claimed the race a variable concept relying on the macro-level and micro-level of social connection (67). The macro-level social relations determines race in terms of businesses, government and mass media’s general ideology. Authors claimed that the race is a complex of various opinions that are in constant transformation under the social and governmental struggle. The micro-level social relation reveals the personal interplay with the surrounding world. The way a person is thinking or interacting with other people refers to the personal or micro-level social relation. The fluid nature of the race, according to Omi and Winant, makes people define and argue the definition of the race on the constant basis (68). The micro and macro-level social relations blur the border of the race and explain the particular phenomenon in terms of human racial identity. Their racial formation theory explains the appearance of racism, fascism, and nationalism as an ideology developed and imposed by the politic forces to subjugate and control people of one race using people from the other. Racial belonging was used as a powerful tool in managing nations. The superior cultural group determines the social identity of a small group by diminishing its status and developing control over it. Sometimes the racial belonging is only defined by the color of the skin. The minor group suppressed by the superior group is bounded in its freedom, movements and economic independence. The racial formation theory is correlated with findings of Roediger. The white color of skin became an asset in the early seventeenth century, creating the racial disparity and provoking the prevalence of slavery. The skin color enabled people to own, purchase and use persons with the different skin. Furthermore, the belief that “white” person can better manage the land formerly belonged to the “nonwhite” was one of the appearances of the racial disparity (2). During the 1860s, the white identity reached its climax in the African-American enslavement and over the next decades created the confrontation of the South and the North States in the Confederate war, one of the visible appearances of racism. The following proclamation of racial equality has generated various social conflicts. The racial formation theory applies to the appearance of racism on the micro-level of social relations. As Roediger claimed “rather than being an expre