History Lens History often helps to determine the specific contradictory facets of human nature. To fundamentally understand the current issue, it is critical to ponder the integral value of the notion of equality in the historical timeline. Moreover, the current issue is in strong need of distinction between two particular problems of equality in society: racism and gender inequality. Nevertheless, the historical lens provides a holistic view of the inequality problem by weighing the outcomes of racial and gender struggles. On the one hand, racial inequality is the interpersonal conflict that has its fundamental importance in the implicit notion that one person has a desire to exploit another one. The main goal of these actions is profit and well-being maximization. However, throughout history, certain developed countries practically demonstrated that liberal laws and personal freedom create higher production output. Consequently, economic output, evidenced by historical representation, created a genuine incentive for people to refuse racism and begin integrating all people into society. This tendency resulted in the most significant development of humanity in history, which has a strictly positive increasing tendency. On the other hand, gender inequality is a cultural bias that was opted on a worldwide basis throughout the vast majority of world history. In many cases, female rights were abused by the absence of their mention in certain laws as equal representatives of society. For instance, in many countries, voting for rights was automatically banned for women who did not possess enough funds to own a house, while there was no equal law for the men’s financial situation (Sewell, 2016). As a result of opting for a law to vote, many women entered the political life of the world’s society. These days, many institutions are affected by the natural development of the inequality question, and the same gender rights made it possible for many women to gain the post in the most valuable institutions of society. The most famous examples are the White House, where Kamala Harris, for the first time as a female, holds a Vice-President post, and the European Central Bank (ECB), which is led these days by Christine Lagard. Humanity Lens From the humanity lens perspective, people have different views since there are as many beneficiaries as those who suffer from the current policy. In other words, humanity is often playing a zero-sum game to make someone happier, and society should take the benefit of another person. However, in the last decades, humanity changed the portrayal of the equality issue. By effectively valuing human rights, developed countries evidenced that this aspect plays a pivotal role if a country or nation desires to transform the zero-sum model into the beneficiary society concept. As a result, quitting the vicious circle by taking advantageous joint choices is the cutting-edge possibility for increasing societies’ surplus. On the personal life level, not many differences were observed since gender equality might be supported without official governmental policy so that no significant abuses affected my life. However, from a professional life perspective, gender equality development w