Subject Supervised Injection Services (SIS) in Interior BC as the means of managing the problem of substance dependence. Context The problem of use disorder has been quite topical for British Columbia (BC), Canada. Supervised Injection Services (SIS) have been established in other areas of Canada, such as Vancouver, yet Interior BC remains without the specified type of support for people with substance dependency issues (Government of Interior BC, 2018). The levels of successful chemical dependency management are currently much higher in Vancouver than in Interior BC (BC Center for Disease Control, 2018). According to the recent statistics, there have been 213 cases of illegal use disorder overdose cases compared to 83 in Vancouver Coastal and 34 in the Interior (BC Center for Disease Control, 2018). Furthermore, statistics show that in 85% of the lethal cases, no emergency call was made (BC Harm Reduction Services, 2018). According to the recent crime statistics, 73% of the substance-related offenses in Interior BC are associated with drug possession (“Cannabis crime statistics in Canada,” 2016). Historically, Interior BC is not predisposed to criminal activity related to illegal drugs. The case under analysis represents Liam Brown, an indigenous Canadian living in rural British Columbia, with a history of substance dependence. Liam has also had several adverse childhood experiences (ACES) and has strong dyslexia. The client was abused by his father, who used physical and emotional intimidation on his child. Although Liam’s mother divorced Liam’s father after the abuse had been discovered, Liam was not provided with the required therapy. The specified experiences can be considered as a serious psychological trauma that could have affected his further development and may have led to the current problem of chemical dependency. The problems are aggravated by COPD, the lack of education, absence of family support, unpaid rent, and job loss. The health care practitioner will work with Liam to identify past coping skills, recognize the effect of his present choices on his health and well-being, and begin forming a plan for care. Financial constraints, the lack of patient education, and service inaccessibility define the problem in the specified region and, particularly, in the case in question (BC Center for Disease Control, 2017; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, n.d.). The patient’s current category can be defined as severe since he lacks control over his problem almost entirely. Therefore, assistance in the form of supervised injections and therapy, as well as detailed consultations, should be provided. Furthermore, the historical issues such as the refusal to view use disorder as a mental health issue and, thus the absence of social support or SIS-related services for the specified demographic should be regarded as a factor for the development of use disorder (Potier, Laprévote, Dubois-Arber, Cottencin, & Rolland, 2014; Potier et al., 2014). The historical context also defines the attitudes toward drug addiction in the specified area, representing it as a social stigma that alienates a patient from a community immediately (BC Center for Disease Control, 2017; Potier et al., 2014). Furthermore, the false assumption that illeg