Introduction Law enforcers investigating different crimes continue to grapple with numerous obstacles. Modern technologies such as the Internet have led to new problems. Internet exploitation, obscenity, and cyber-stalking are crimes that have become hard to mitigate. This paper describes the major challenges facing law enforcement agencies whenever dealing with these crimes and offers evidence-based approaches to minimize them. Greatest Challenge Brown (2015) acknowledges that law enforcement institutions are unable to deal with various crimes associated with the Internet such as exploitation and cyberstalking. This is the case due to various problems such as overlapping jurisdictions and lack of adequate funds. However, the biggest challenge facing such agencies whenever investigating these criminal acts is the ability to get and detect evidence. The rationale for this argument arises from the nature of modern technologies (Ibrahim, 2016). Emerging technologies are making it easier for perpetrators to delete, change, or even destroy data on their computers. That being the case, enforcers cannot be in a position to collect and examine the intended data. Additionally, the fact that culprits engaged in such criminal activities might be residing in different countries, states, or continents makes it impossible for law enforcement agencies to collect accurate and timely data (Ajayi, 2016). Coupled with various obstacles such as existing seizure laws and overlapping jurisdictions, this challenge makes it hard for different agencies to deal with cybercrime. Overlapping Jurisdictions and Salient Solutions As indicated earlier, overlapping jurisdictions pose several challenges in the fight against cybercrime. To begin with, many state and national laws require warrants to be issued before law enforcers can collect evidence or search for information. This situation makes it hard to collect data immediately and establish a strong case against the offender. Secondly, cybercriminals can operate globally. Such criminals might be in a given state while the victim is in another region. Such countries will have different agencies that are required to carry out targeted investigations (Ibrahim, 2016). That being the case, such agencies might not share critical evidence due to the nature of existing laws in their respective states or nations. The third challenge is the scope of the legislation. This means that there is no homologous legislation aimed at addressing the problem of cybercrime across the globe. Existing laws make it hard for countries to deal with this form of crime. In some countries, crimes such as cyber-stalking and obscenity might not be taken seriously by the existing laws (Ibrahim, 2016). This means that a cybercriminal in a given country might not be viewed as guilty elsewhere depending on the nature of the offense. Some nations lack adequate laws to cover malpractices such as the use of malicious software and unauthorized access to people’s computer systems. Each of these challenges can be addressed using adequate solutions. The first problem requires governments to revise existing laws in such a way that a cybercriminal’s premises and computer