One of the outstanding American writers John Grisham in his novels tends to discover the social and political intrigues being thoroughly hidden from the publicity. His talent is determined by his desire to follow the fair steps in maintaining any democratic affairs in the society of the United States of America. His manner of writing is fascinating in his courageous attempts to discredit all the opportunities and tries of the civil servants, especially in the political field. The author of “The Firm” and further “The Client” achieved crucial popularity due to the grave and direct ideas in another novel titled “The Pelican Brief”. The plot of the story illustrates the mysterious and unapproved murders of two judges of the Supreme Court, who became interesting for a student of Tulane University Law School Darby Shaw played by Julia Roberts. She begins writing and arranging a brief to this case for working out the real reasons as well as instigators of this assassination. Also, Darby shares her brief with a law professor of the institute Thomas Callahan with whom she even had intimate relationships. The chain of people informed about this case was added by FBI Washington lawyer Gavin Verheek. Both men soon were killed. The pressure grows higher and higher when Darby realizes that her life is in danger and every step of hers is watched. The only person who encourages Darby Shaw in this potential fact-finding is an interested and involved reporter for ‘Washington Herald’ Gray Grantham (Denzel Washington) with whom they reach the point and find out the copartnership of local tycoon Victor Mattiece who accompanied with the President committed a misdemeanor. The story by John Grisham supposes those sides in the higher echelons of state authority which deal with corruption and big sums of money considered to be within high-level officials and social figures having great financial background so that to make an influence on the societal affairs. The thing is that the sphere of justice should be neutral to such messes and provide objective thinking and survey of all sides of people’s activity regardless of their strata in the social cut. For this purpose, it is significant to figure out whether the Courts are impacted by several factors like money, power, or even survival? The base of the Courts is realized with the supplement of personal attitudes, making out and ideological standpoints embodied into preferred values in support of civilians. Judges are the main figures who were placed to vote for or against defendants in criminal prosecution. It concerns the Courts in general, but the highest body of legal power incorporated in the work of the Supreme Court is under supervision. The attitudinal factor strived at judges leaves many questions from the side of observers, journalists, or other interested people. “Case stimuli (j-points), presented to the justices for approval or disapproval, can similarly be measured in the same multidimensional space: ‘The decision of the Court, in any case, will depend upon whether the case dominates, or is dominated by, a majority of i-points” (p.38).” (Segal&Albert 3) This statement is logically grounded as for the intentions hidden in every human being as for gaining as more profits as possible. Preferences which every Supreme Judge has to prop up against the constitu