Introduction This paper is aimed at investigation of the risk assessment during the acquisition, focusing on management assessment and analytical evaluation. These tools are rather significant to evaluate key resources and competencies necessary to consider the implementation of the organizational goals. Considering that this is the continuation of the primary research in which several managers were surveyed in order to reveal their attitudes towards risks levels, it is possible to provide appropriate evaluation of the results of the survey. In particular, this paper will analyze the post-acquisition risks both from internal and external points. The representatives of Expert Future Cargo can be regarded as the external focus of the assessment while CLA Company as the internal one. After the evaluation, the paper will present a strategic dashboard associated with acquisition of Expert Future Cargo by CLA Company that, in turn, is likely to contribute to the successful completion of the acquisition process and the further productive collaboration. Risk Typology One can distinguish between several risk types each of which can cause significant damages. However, it should be emphasized that the level of the potential damage of these risks varies. The list of essential risks to the acquisition of the identified companies is presented below.   * Operational risk is associated with ineffective performance of staff, failure to manage systems and procedures, or impact of external factors. For example, such issues as fraud, improper trade, unfair employment, and others can be noted.   * Strategic risk involves failure to provide effective business strategy. The examples of this type of risk can contain vague corporate vision or poor business decisions.   * Reputational risk is a threat to the image or standing of a company. Every employee, manager, or partners can cause this type of damage.   * Financial risk is associated with potential losses occurred due to inappropriate financial techniques and procedures that can lead to debt or default.   * Legal risk implies failure to follow regulations and obligations related to law. Analysis of Survey Results Before starting the analysis of the survey results, it seems necessary to provide some insights into the fundamentals of risk analysis. In particular, it usually consists of four steps: threat, crisis, disruption, and impact. The threat might be identified as an assessment of the probability of threats based on known statistics of occurrence of similar security incidents in the past. The crisis is a demonstration of a risk. Each crisis is marked by certain degree that shows a possible likelihood of events (based on statistics). This degree is used in the risk assessment. Disruption is created by crisis. Precisely speaking, it occurs due to the shortage or unavailability of critical resources and varies between very low and very high. The risk impact is a measure of the severity of the negative effects, the level of damages, or assessment of the potential of risk. Impact assessment includes not only the calculation of direct damages as a result of the implementation of threats. It is more convenient to talk about the extent of