This article sought to understand whether male individuals confronted with a rape situation would decide to help. The author simulated a rape situation in a natural setting. The location’s topography ensured that the targeted subjects made their decisions to help the victims. The “researchers expected the targeted bystanders to intervene directly, walk away, or summon a police officer to help” (Harari et al. 653). Most of “the individuals in groups were most likely to help compared with individual bystanders” (Harari et al. 653). Individuals in groups offered direct assistance to the victims. The study also criticized the use of laboratory research because of problems associated with social desirability, generalizability, and demand characteristics. The researchers managed to manipulate the response of different individuals and group bystanders. The researchers did not use a specific hypothesis or research question. The researchers wanted to understand how individual male bystanders or group confronted with various rape situations would be compelled to help (Harari et al. 654). The authors wanted to understand whether male bystanders would help rape victims when in groups. This research question was critical towards realizing the targeted results. The research question also made it easier for the researchers to formulate the best literature review (Maxfield and Babbie 24). The research question made it easier to execute a successful study. The study followed a good research study in order to achieve the targeted goals. The researchers used secluded areas for staging the rape scenes. Similar topographical dimensions characterized these areas. The researchers encouraged 393 male students from San Diego State University to participate in the study. Most of “these students walked in groups or alone towards the targeted rape scenes” (Harari et al. 653). The authors identified the bets vintage points to ensure the study was accessible. These vintage points encouraged the subjects to act differently after witnessing the rape scene. The research strategy made the study effective and successful. The researchers also managed to achieve the targeted goals. The researchers could have used some other research strategies. A good example was the use of questionnaires to understand how different individuals would respond to various rape scenes. The researchers would use the questionnaires or group discussions to gather the relevant information about people’s response to various rape scenes (Harari et al. 656). This study also shows how the naturalistic setting played a major role towards an effective study. These two approaches could also have been used together to come up with better findings. The researchers could have used new qualitative and quantitative techniques in order to come up with better results. Such findings would have contributed a lot to the above understanding. A qualitative research would have resulted in meaningful and applicable findings. Qualitative researches usually focus on people thoughts and concepts about certain issues in the society. The researchers would have used different meetings and group discussions to understand how individuals would have responded to these rape scenes. The authors could have used focus groups depending on the targeted research questions. Qualitative research methods are critical towards getting immediate responses from the interview