In what do you have faith? Taking into consideration the various misinterpretations of faith, it is frequently difficult to formulate in what one has faith. The major mistakes made when analyzing faith are reducing faith to “believing things,” relating it to “behaving morally,” dismissing faith as something “deep in our souls,” and associating it with “being religious” (Tilley, 8). To avoid any of these misinterpretations, I will try to come up with my own explanation of what faith is to me. Personally, I have faith in the fight between good and evil, and in the need to behave towards others as I would like them to treat me. My understanding of faith is close to the definition suggested by Tilley, who argues that faith is the relationship between the person who has faith and that “which one has faith in” (27-28). I believe that there can be a close connection between individuals and their beliefs that makes it possible to support their faith and cultivate it. On the contrary, when there is no such connection, one’s faith is not strong enough. I have faith in doing good deeds for people and not expecting anything in return. This aspect of my faith is connected with religious beliefs. It presupposes not thinking of what I will receive in exchange for something I have done, but instead enjoying the mere satisfaction of having performed something nice for others. Also, I believe that if someone does something bad consciously and intentionally, he or she will be punished for that sooner or later. I think that people should support one another and live in peace irrespective of the differences in their religious views or moral values. When it comes to sex, abortion, and consumerism, explore how the concept of “free choice” functions in the authors we read and the debates we had on voice-thread. Have a particular focus on the critiques which argue, because of the social structures in which they are made, our choices are less free than we might imagine them to be at first. Some aspects of people’s lives are associated with so-called free choice, which entitles individuals to make decisions regarding how to behave in a particular situation. This includes such aspects as abortion, sex, and consumerism, among others. While the concept of free choice seems like a favorable option, some scholars argue that our decisions are not as independent as we imagine them to be. For instance, Smith remarks that donating one’s organs after euthanasia is “the last nod to a consumerist culture” (Camosy, 76). While someone has the choice of donating his or her organs after death, the increased responsibility gradually makes people feel obliged to give away their organs. As a result, as the scholar notes, some individuals may be prone to committing suicide or requesting euthanasia because they think that their lives would matter after they help others (Camosy, 76). This critique indicates that the notion of free choice is much more complicated than it seems at first sight. There are similar concerns related to decisions regarding sex and abortion. It may seem that one has free choice of whether to engage in sexual intercourse. However, it turns out that individuals may feel pres