There is quite a large number of philosophic works and theories on the connection between the human will and the intellect and their collaboration. Some philosophers sincerely believe that everything is either presupposed by nature and higher laws or is implemented in the human’s consciousness and controlled by people. Rene Descartes is one of the main ideologists of the free will and the error inclination of the human intellectual knowledge, and his main idea penetrating all the aspects of his philosophic views is that the human error is produced by the intellect when will is a broader and clearer notion. The differentiation between the will and the intellect has been a subject of various arguments and theories throughout the whole story of philosophy as the fundamental knowledge. The main matter of concern is whether the two notions are equal, or any of them tend to be broader. Rene Descartes, in his theories, goes much deeper than simply opposing the will to the intellect, dividing a human being into the possible bearer of two different ways of thinking: the perceptive and the determined one. Here, seemingly, grasping the information from the imagination and acquiring any kind of worldview is opposed to the power of will, which lets a human being feel emotions, doubt, and denies. It is also noteworthy that Descartes connects both notions to that of the human error and its origins, which consists of the person’s natural capability of being disillusioned. In connection with the mentioned above facts, one of the main topics for Descartes is the understanding of whether people can produce an error based on the will or on the intellect (Jayasekera 2-15). First of all, it is necessary to distinguish between Descartes’s will and intellect, giving one of the notions a broader meaning. Thus, according to his theoretic conclusions, the notion of will is synonymous with the freedom of thought, given by God to his children. The human will is free and powerful, it is not limited by anything, and if everything in people is created after the image and likeness of the higher power. It is possible to suppose that Descartes sees the will as the perfect gift of God. At this very point, it is very important for Descartes to explain the origins of the human error, as the will presented by the highest power cannot give an error, it is created for another purpose. As a matter of fact, Descartes also notes that the error itself can be produced by a human being, due to a person being absolutely imperfect, compared to God: he explains that people are only created by God, but they are not God himself. As for the intellect, one can avoid erring only if the judgement is not included into the thinking process, as judging belongs to the will, not the intellect (Frogel 93-108). However, it is rather important to see, how the error can be produced, according to Descartes. If we see the will and the intellect as the God gift, then it is impossible to imagine that any of the components can lead a human being to the wrong decisions or choices. Nevertheless, erring is clearly a human natural aspect, so it ether comes from the will, or from the intellect. Descartes states that the human error arises