The evaluation of the programs of the juvenile justice policy reform depends on the lacunas in the systems and then evaluating the effecting the efficacy of the various measures adopted to address various issues confronting the juvenile justice reform Juvenile justice reform policy with its increased emphasis on zero tolerance in the face of the rising crime rates needs to be analyzed and evaluated on ethical grounds. These evaluations are a necessary measure as it reveals that our justice system is not supporting any kind of biases or is it in any way violating human rights. The escalation of the crime rates to 43% between1985 to 2000 in the U.S (Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency Prevention, 2000 has created a hype subsequently it has led to regulation of stringent laws as there is a purported threat to public safety. This rise in crime rate needs to be dissected and analyzed so as to objectively find out whether there is a real threat is a kind of hysteria that has been created. Crime rates are often very ambiguous because it includes offenses committed by youngster which are not crimes if an adult would have done the same like running away from home. Some crimes like a violation of curfew or possession of prescription drugs on-campus schools are minor offenses. These offences are a major cause of the high crime rates found in the United States On the contrary the rate of serious violations has decreased by 33% reflecting the efficacy of the comprehensive approach that was adopted by the law enforcing agencies along with the social organizations. Everybody is equal in the eyes of law and it is the basic principle on which the judicial system of a nation works. It is incumbent on all those who are a part o the law enforcing body to be ideally devoid of any kind of racialism. It’s unfortunate that those who wield power and riches can go scot-free whereas those who belong to racial minorities and impoverished backgrounds are not left even if they have committed some small violation of the law. The role of the police department is very essential. They are the ones who are responsible for arresting a minor on the charges of offense. They have special discretionary power with them which in legal terminology is called diversion which means that either the police can reprimand the offender so that it can act as a deterrent. or it can refer the person violating the law to an asocial organization The success and the promotion of an officer is based on the number of arrests and convictions of a crime. The officers should be programmed in such a manner that they give precedence to a reduction in crime by not putting every offender behind the bars but by reforming the criminals in a manner that they voluntarily leave the path of crime. It is very essential that the police department should be cleansed of racial bias. It is said that this department which is responsible for the implementation of justice which is reeling under the accusation that it is biased. It is the right of the person who has committed the crime for a free and fair trial. The ratio of the colored versus white is two is to one far as the rate of referral to the court is concerned. interestingly the percentage of the white youth involved in serious crime is