Schultze’ research article, titled “A Confession Account of an Ethnographer about Knowledge Work”, utilized ethnography as the core research design to explore knowledge work in situ (in the original position), with the intention of developing a grounded understanding of what knowledge production actually entails and what knowledge work is like. The researcher notes that ethnography is an anthropological research approach that profoundly relies on first-hand observations made by the investigator immersed over a prolonged period of time in an unfamiliar or foreign environmental setting (Schultze, 2000). This method, according to the author, obliges the investigator to intimately observe, take notes, and engage in the daily life of the participants, and then writes about the observations and/or findings in descriptive detail. The investigator adopted a flexible and frequently unstructured design in the form of ethnography, ultimately suspending his own frame of reference and allowing him to be directed by the social setting of the participants to new and unanticipated insights (Schultze, 2000). This particular study collected largely descriptive data from three samples of knowledge workers in the information and communication industry, including “…computer system administrators, competitive intelligence analysts, and librarians” (Schultze, 2000, p. 4). In particular, the investigator collected rich descriptions of professionals working in these sections through immersing himself into the daily lives of the participants, who worked in a United States-based Fortune 500 manufacturing firm. It is important to note that the investigator heavily relied on unstructured interviews and informal conversations with participants as major data collection strategies, not only to prevent jeopardizing his ability to observe in-the moment behaviors portrayed by participants but also to learn from the participants perspectives (Schultze, 2000). This particular study purposed to undertake research on the work of producing or generating information in practice with the view of developing a better understanding of knowledge work, informing practices, and the role of knowledge management technologies used by groups of knowledge workers in a technology setting. Based on this broad format, it was beneficial for the investigator to employing ethnography research design as it enabled him to gain useful insights into the day-to-day actions and behaviors of the knowledge workers; that is, the researcher assumed an identity as a also enabled the investigator to establish a perspective similar to that of an insider, ultimately making it possible for him to collect unabridged rich textual information from the participants’ side of the story. Consequently, it can be argued that the researcher benefited from using this type of design as it not only enabled him to account for the complexity of behaviors witnessed in the sampled groups and demonstrate interrelationships among complex dimension of group interactions, but also provided the context for explaining behaviors and revealed qualities of group experience in a manner that other research methods cannot possibly achieve. In summary, the researcher identified three informing practices, namely expressing, monitoring a