Which of the four levels of analysis (Global, Interstate, Domestic, and Individual) is the most salient cause for conflicts in the 21st Century? Conflict analysis is an important concept that helps stakeholders to comprehend the features, reasons, and trends of conflicts. This systematic study assists development, humanitarian as well as peacekeeping institutions to gain an understanding of conflict situations and come up with approaches to maintaining security. Influences of war are at global, interstate, domestic, and individual levels. However, influences at the domestic level can be viewed as the main cause of disagreements in the 21 st century (Haynes et al. 23). These reasons can be related to nationalism, ethnics, dictatorships, political coalitions, public opinion, foreign policy bureaucracies, and gender issues. Notably, 21 st -century conflicts revolve around politics, power, and competition among actors as well as the changing of institutions to benefit a few individuals in society. Persons and groups cannot randomly fight each other unless individuals who have vested domestic interests mobilize them (Wehr 34). The conflict in Rwanda that was typified by brutal killings of victims in their villages and towns by their neighbors was premised on ethnic cleansing. In the former Yugoslavia, it was evident that ethnic hatred led to violations of human rights and mass atrocities. The conflict in South Sudan (ongoing) was caused by power contests between those in the government and those in the opposition. In addition, this war was fuelled by the desire of various armed groups to control the wealth accumulated from oil reserves. The crisis in Sudan can be attributed to democracy issues because the people felt that the government was not paying attention to the voices of the population. Thus, they took to the streets to protest political and economic policies that were unpopular. According to these illustrations, it is evident that domestic issues are the main reasons nations are characterized by conflicts, both armed and unarmed (Wehr 7). Whether these disagreements will reduce in the future depends on how individuals and institutions will handle local issues that affect the majority of citizens. Do a critical assessment on the implications of the deployment of peacekeeping operations in Yugoslavia (i.e. Bosnia) OR Timor Leste. What is considered a successful or unsuccessful peacekeeping operation? What is your verdict and why? Peacekeeping operations in Yugoslavia (Bosnia) were viewed as important activities as well as foreign policy instruments to create and maintain peace and security. Peacekeeping is one of the core approaches of the United Nations in maintaining peace and security around the world. Currently, there are more than one hundred thousand UN soldiers charged with protecting human populations and sustaining security in war-torn countries (Beardsley et al. 676). The UN has failed in some cases (for example, Rwanda), while it has succeeded in others (El Salvador). The war in the former Yugoslavia started when the Soviet Union crumbled in 1991, and this collapse also resulted in the end of the Cold War. The liberal government of Canada argued that a humanitarian solution could be successful only if it was supplemented by the political commitment of the international community. On the one hand, NATO and UNPROFOR practiced the ‘dual key’ strategy, while on the other hand, the U.S. insisted on the utilization of air power (Beardsley et al. 680). The UN’s arms ban on Bosnia was violated because third-party nations were supplying Muslims in Yugo