There are various similarities and differences between peasant actions in the Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India and Peasant Uprising in Japan. To begin with, various common and important elements are present in rebellion in rural India from 1783 to around 1900. Evidently, during these Indian colonial times, there were various peasants’ viewpoints that relate mainly to the dominance and subordination of the rural colonial Indians. In addition, peasants mainly rebelled against the British system of imperialist oppression, since, to some extent, they did not have enough resources and power to use. Moreover, peasants also rebelled against some local landlords due to the exploitation they faced from them. On the other hand, the peasant uprising in Tokugawa Japan was full of crises and rebellion due to food riots and fears of famine and starvation. For example, due to frequent famine in these regions, peasants developed a moral economy in order to satisfy their basic subsistence needs. Furthermore, they chose various low-risk economic ways, mainly because they feared high risks. Therefore, all these peasant behaviors were associated with various low economic risks that enabled them to avoid high risks, thus providing a better understanding of their political behavior. The peasant rebellion in Japan was about not only exploitation but also the hard economic status and living standards they were subjected to. In this case, therefore, the peasants were more likely to rebel and protest after the landlords, and even the government had taken away most of their subsistence resources in the form of rent and taxes to a level where they could not satisfy themselves. To be clear, this means that they were likely to protest and rebel when faced with starvation and hunger. As a result, their action to rebel and protest was, therefore, mainly motivated by their need and desire to bring back the lost subsistence systems that were being tampered with by the market policies from outside their country. On the other hand, the rebellious nature of peasants in India was mainly due to the need for improvement of social class and mainly against the British, which was from outside their country. Moreover, the peasant in Japan rebelled and protested in order to ensure that both their physical and social needs were met. They wanted to achieve the morally accepted standards of living, with the belief that traditional subsistence system policies were much better since they provided more security to them. Although they were rational in considering risky situations, it was clear that peasant farmers could make more profit when involved in commercial agricultural farming. In addition, they demanded freedom of choice in terms of expected benefits, which meant that their movement’s political behavior relied heavily on the political mobilization system acquired for the aim of achieving power within a standard social and political environment. The peasants’ uprising movements mainly occurred in areas where there were more subsistence ways of production, for example, the Shindatsu rebellion and uprising. Incidentally, in these communities, all the peasants depended on the market for the satisfaction of their basic needs, such as food. In addition, they resorted t