This critical writing is a review of the article “Does Innovation Leadership Enhance Creativity in High-Tech Industries” by Feng-Cheng Tung and Tsu-Wei Yu. Mainly, the authors’ purpose is to analyze the importance of innovation leadership in enhancing creativity in high-tech industries. In particular, it builds up a substantial knowledge of the impact of innovation leadership inform of instrumental, supportive, and participative on supervisory-based employee tasks via a strong regulatory focus on employees using prevention and promotion. Notably, the article relates to other works in the same subject regarding innovation leadership and creativity. Considerably, a significant number of organizations rely on creativity and innovation because of their role in formulating business strategies. The authors of the article are not only knowledgeable but also have reputation and authority in the field. Remarkably, Tung is an assistant professor (Kun Shan University) whose interests include leadership, innovation, organization development, marketing, human resource, and information system. On the other hand, Yu is an assistant professor (Chaoyang University of Technology) with interests in the organization, management, marketing management, and finance. The intended audiences of the article include human resource managers, IT experts, financial managers, organizational leadership, innovators, supervisors, employees, scholars, and general readers. Mainly, the objective of the article is to present an argument that builds on the audiences’ past knowledge or research. Notably, Tung and Yu agree with contemporary literature that the creativity of an employee forms the basis of creativity and innovation in an organization; and hence, business performance (579). However, they argue that the creativity and innovation of an employee are not automatic; thus, leaders have to provide employees with support and encouragement during the creative process. The article is based on the identified study gap in which prior studies have only studied leadership as the only factor influencing creativity. In this regard, the article considers both leadership creativity and innovation. The authors of the study have comprehensively defined important terms and explained them in the perspective of the arguments presented in the article. In particular, “the study defines innovation leadership and then develops a measurement of its dimensions by examining the relationship between innovation leadership, regulatory focus, and employee creativity, and then further by examining the mediating effect of regulatory focus” (Tung and Yu 580). The three leadership styles namely innovation leadership, supportive leadership, and participative leadership are well defined and well explained in the perspective of high-tech industries. For instance, participative leadership is defined as a style that promotes group decision making; whereby, participative leaders permit employees to make some decisions regarding their work (Tung and Yu 580). Mainly, participative leaders desist from imposing their own ideas and opinions, value, and rely on subordinates’ standpoints. The information presented in the article constitutes both facts and opinions. Notably, the findings of the empi