Contemporary society is at the core of progressive and liberalist views on relations, love, and sexual orientation. Therefore, the campaigns supporting same-sex marriage cannot be regarded as provocations and strikes against the existing morale in society. In political and social terms, gay and lesbian unions cannot be regarded as liberal movements, or as something that should be resolutely considered. At the same time, there are still debates on the crisis marriage as itself which destroys conventional views on relations and attitude to officially registered relations. Because there is a stronger popularity of civil marriage, middle-class people were decisive in setting the tastes and norms of intimate relationships (Warner 2000). In such a manner, the institution of marriage is currently at high risk because of recent tendencies in promulgating freedom of individuals and their rights contributing to higher rates of divorce. Individual preferences and tastes by the dominating social class influence the overall politics of conservative movements and, as a result, more and more people alter their views on marriage. In particular, the current concept of marriage can hardly be associated with procreation. Heterosexual marriages, therefore, have come out of fashion, because they do not have proved their rights for living together and building their relations independently. Probably, such a tendency is historically predetermined. In particular, Shumway (2003) emphasizes, “the connection between romance and marriage forged in the nineteenth century was an expression of individualism, of the growing freedom of the individual from traditional social structures” (p. 27). In such way, the discourse of intimacy presents both the focus on the concept of marriage, as well as adverse reactions to it. Marriage was often considered as a successful financial, political, and beneficial union of two people where love was of secondary importance. Nowadays, gay marriage faces a similar situation, but in a different context. Marriage serves not as a proof of strong feelings, but as an attempt to make heterosexual community recognize gay and lesbian relationships. Regarding the above-presented deliberations, same-sex marriage has become the objects of active debates between two oppositions. One the one hand, people despise same-sex marriages because of their homophobic feelings and straight attitude to marriage as a conventional institution that take heterosexual relations and procreation for granted. On the other hand, current shifts in views on marriage provides a solid ground for gay and lesbian movements to fight of their right to be officially recognized through marriage. The latter, however, does not stipulate the crisis of marriage but half-opens the curtain at the actual state of affairs. In this respect, Warner (2000) argues, “there is something unfashionable… about discussion of marriage as a goal of gay politics” (p. 83). In this respect, the author attempts to emphasize that political and economic instability of society should not solely rely on traditional conception of family that had been cultivated in the time of the American Dream propagating. By blaming sexual minorities movements and struggle for equal rights, heterosexual society fails to recognize the actual reasons of the crisis of the marriage institution. Specifically, Shumway (2003) focuses on the terms of intimacy and explains, “…society is increasingly accepting of a diversity of intimate relationships, yet the widespread influence of the discourse intimacy suggests that most Americans still value marriage very highly” (p. 26). The problem is that these highly valued norms are deviated by existing false stereotypes and association with intimacy relations. In this respect, the debates concerns with the bias associated with marriage and its interpretation that marriage belongs to a class of relationships (Shumway 2003, p. 26). Shumway presents movie both as hugely influential and as a trigger of shifts in traditional societal views on marriage. Specifically, the author’s thesis is confined to the thesis that most movies are not interested in depicting love in marriage, but romantic relationships leading to marriage, or love outside the marriage. The importance of conflict and emotional feeling is not possible to reveal through harmonic relations between a husband and wife. However, people are more attracted while looking at the divorce process, adultery, or early stages of affection between two lovers. Within this context, American society must not blame homosexual relations as the reason for the destruction of marriage as a firmly established social institution. Tastes and preferences, as it has been highlighted above, dictate new norms and rules for intimate relations. Therefore, the current campaigns for gay and lesbian marriages have become mostly conservative. To enlarge on this issue, Bordieu (1984) considers marriage “a way of expression of social and political proximity” dictated by preferences and tastes of middle classes of society (p. 557). The breakdown in the system of marital relations should not be directed at the increased popularization of gay marriages. In fact, the transformation of the class preferences explains the changing views on the conditions of reproduction. Hence, it