Introduction The unequal distribution of Nobel Prizes among male and female scientists requires particular consideration and additional measures to eliminate the problem. This stance is conditional upon the fact that there is no reported equality in this area, and the statistical data only demonstrate the percentage of winners (“Nobel Prize Awards by Gender in Each Category”). In this case, many aspects are neglected, and they primarily include the procedures accompanying the ceremony and the impact of the attitudes of its organizers. Therefore, it is reasonable to suggest that instilling quotas ensuring a certain percentage of women receive the prize is critical from the perspective of objectivity. Unequal Representation and Bias The main circumstance affecting the selected standpoint is the fact that there is no correlation between the representation of women in science and the number of Nobel Prize winners among them. According to Mallapaty, only 2.77 percent of prizes were given to them, and this indicator seems alarming when contrasted with other sources of information. Thus, as per the specialists’ reports, female scientists are more numerous than their lucky counterparts selected for the awards, whereas this problem does not apply to men (Greenfieldboyce and Madeline). Due to the lack of evidence in this regard or any other contradictory statements, the only logical explanation is bias against the former (“Nobel Prize Awards by Gender in Each Category”). Thus, the quotas are an optimal solution to this challenge as they will address the possibility of prejudiced attitudes. The Lack of Clarity in The Nomination Process Another aspect of the matter is the regulations regarding the nomination process since the possibility of prejudice in these procedures is not revealed by any studies. As follows from its description, the selection of invited scientists is still kept secret; there are no clear guidelines in this respect provided (Greenfieldboyce and Madeline). Meanwhile, it is claimed that white men are the ones who receive the majority of awards (Greenfieldboyce and Madeline). In this case, the neglect of other citizens’ involvement is unacceptable, and it can be adequately addressed only by the elaboration of specific rules. Hence, the suggestion to instill quotas for women is feasible for this purpose. The Absence of Critical Statistical Data In addition, the problems specified above are complemented by the lack of statistical data regarding women’s participation in this event. As follows from the official sources, their researchers do not provide any interpretation of the surprisingly small ratio of female scientists presented for the award (“Nobel Prize Awards by Gender in Each Category”). They only claim the lack of evidence in this regard and, consequently, the impossibility of understanding the roots of the problem (“Nobel Prize Awards by Gender in Each Category”). Considering these circumstances, it is clear that the implementation of effective measures is required, and the introduction of quotas after examining the issue is one of them. Conclusion To summarize, the prevalence of male winners of Nobel Prizes is a challenge that should be addressed by the organizers of this event. This conclusion is based on the data provided by entities, and they refer to the problem as a great likelihood of bias towards women. First, the lack of equality in the