“Sectarianism is a form of bigotry, discrimination, or hatred arising from attaching importance to perceived differences between subdivisions within a group, such as between different denominations of a religion, nationalism, class, regional or factions of a political movement.” 1 The conceptual reinforcements of insolences and actions considered as sectarian are extremely diverse. The followers of a spiritual, state or party-political assembly may have confidence in that their own redemption, or the accomplishment of their specific purposes, necessitates belligerently looking for adapts from other assemblies; moreover, the supporters of this particular group may have confidence in that for the accomplishment of their own party-political or spiritual mission their interior adversaries have to be rehabilitated or eliminated. Sectarianism may not have been the state-policy of the Ottomans; however, they sought to keep a large empire unified and by doing that they suppressed non-Sunni Muslim minorities in the region they ruled. Sectarianism was thus only a byproduct of a more finance-oriented policy that Ottomans followed. The main objective of this essay is to observe and reflect the evidence towards or against the policy of sectarianism during the reign of the Ottoman Empire on the territories under its commandment; moreover, the research conducted while writing this essay will determine whether the sectarianism under Ottoman rule was or was not a state policy. From time to time, an assembly that is below financial or party-political compression will execute or try to attack the associates of other groups that it concerns as accountable for its own deterioration. It can more severely describe the description of conventional faith in its certain assembly or society, and eject or exclude those who fail to sustain this fresh originate elucidated description of the party-political or religious convention. In other instances, dissidents from this convention will separate from the conventional organization and announce themselves as experts of a rehabilitated faith scheme, or containers of an apparent former convention. In other cases, sectarianism can be the appearance of an assembly’s chauvinistic or national determinations, or subjugated by agitators. The situation of Jewish and Christian minorities among the population in the Ottoman Empire is a subject matter that endures to be in doubt and widely discussed up to this day, just about a hundred years after the formal termination of the Ottoman Empire itself. Spiritual connotation characteristically resulted in obtaining the rank in the Muslim Ottoman Empire for the most part. As Moshe Ma’oz mentioned in the study, Christians and Jews has been always observed as substandard matters or as unlawful quantities 2 . As a consequence, these social groups were frequently distinguished in contradiction of the state entity. On the other hand, other academics would contend that the place of social, religious, and ethnical subgroups under the Ottoman Rule was compassionate in comparison to the behavior towards the minorities elsewhere around the globe, such as in particular areas of Europe. According to Edward Said, “abuses of Orientalism, that is a Western way of ‘dominating’ or ‘restructuring’ the history of the Middle East because of prejudice against Arab-Islamic peoples, has caused a misconstruction of the historical narrative.” 3 According to Bruce Masters, Westerners were classically