Introduction Suicide has recently grown into one of the most severe adverse events related to public health, necessitating the heightened awareness of both respective governmental agencies and distinct healthcare professionals. In this regard, suicidal risk assessment acts as essential preventive practice, mitigating self-harm and suicidal intentions and improving wellbeing. However, to be effective, this intervention is a challenging process since it requires the active engagement of clinicians and clients, the proper gathering of all critical information, and relevant follow-up actions. This paper aims to reflect on the interview with Gail, a 72-year-old female patient who became inclined to suicide risk complicated to the recent death of her husband. Specifically, the paper will discuss several instances indicating strong skills use, examples showing a need for further skill development and the role of multiple socio-cultural identities in the appraisal. Instances of Strong Skills Use Gathering Essential Information The first skill appropriately applied in the interview session is collecting the necessary information to gain in-depth insight into the patient’s status and main problems. Gathering data is an integral component of the assessment needed to reveal clients’ distress levels and current feelings and thoughts about their life situations (“Suicide risk assessment,” n.d.). It also helps medical professionals identify specific risk, warning, or protective factors significantly contributing to patients’ predispositions to commit suicide. It is worth noting that this stage entails collecting information from patients and other individuals involved in clients’ life to a particular extent. In this interview, I ascertained that the primary reason for Gail’s desire to end her life was the death of her beloved husband, with whom they had intimate relationships. The patient previously tended to experience recurrent and prolonged attacks of mostly unfounded anxiety. Her complicated and delicate psychological condition was also stipulated by the absence of children and close relatives, sometimes causing acute loneliness. In this regard, the husband was her sole consolation and support, and his abrupt demise due to a severe stroke in a vulnerable mental state that did not receive any adequate treatment before. Along with warning signs, there were also some protective contributors. In particular, Gail had good relationships with her neighbors, who eventually resorted to the ambulance. She also had interaction with her brother, who currently serves as her emergency contact. Finally, Gail was actively engaged in her hobbies, that is, housekeeping and gardening, which aided her in distracting from disturbing thoughts and brought some enjoyment. Nevertheless, after her husband’s death, her everyday activities and contacts lost any sense, which incited Gail to self-murder. Referring the Patient to Inpatient Treatment Gail’s referral for inpatient treatment was the right decision, substantiated by her mental condition and determination to commit suicide in the nearest future. Gail stated that she had a specific plan and pills needed to kill herself. In this regard, inpatient treatment could save her from extreme attempts and act