Introduction Philosophical theories present rather interesting and sometimes controversial issues being applied in the context of modern realities. In this paper, I will initiate “traveling” to the three societies, namely, Platonic, Aristotelian, and Marxist, in order to reveal their nature, organization, and other peculiarities. Platonic Society Reflecting on Platonic society, I consider that it seeks to re-use the concept of ideas. The variety of human needs and the inability to meet them alone were an incentive for the creation of this state. According to Platonic society, the greatest good is justice, while injustice is evil (Crombie, 2012). This society refers to the following types of government: timocracy (owners’ power), oligarchy, tyranny, and democracy. I observed that Platonic society citizens’ souls consist of three parts: rational, spirited, and appetitive. Some citizens are intelligent, wise, and they can, therefore, manage the state. Others are effective and courageous; they are destined to be strategists, generals, and warriors. Having a predominantly appetitive soul, third ones are to be craftsmen and farmers. In other words, there are three classes: rulers, farmers, and artisans. Furthermore, I noted plenty of concrete recipes, for example, how children should be taught and educated. In particular, it is supposed to deprive guard members of property or introduce different kinds of regulations for them as well as implement the commonality of wives and children (Crombie, 2012). Also, literature is subject to strict censorship, including everything that can discredit the idea of justice. As for the afterlife, Plato fellow citizens believe that the soul of man continues to exist after his death as the idea. At that, bliss is waiting for virtuous and terrible torture for perverse. It seems that Plato mentally constructed an ideal state, which, in his view, could prevent many injustices. This society that was described above comes from the ideal, which could be as constant as his idea (Crombie, 2012). Plato wanted to achieve the ideal, but it turned out in utopia, in which researchers have revealed the idealization. In Plato’s teaching of society, I can discern duplication of the same philosophical idea that was expressed in teachings of nature: starting with ideas that are understood as generative models and, at the same time, as the ideals, he builds them speculatively based on limited historical knowledge. The result is utopia. This might be regarded as the main weakness in his theory. Plato starts with the idea that is right. Then he proceeds with ideal likewise other prominent philosophers using the idea and ideal (O’Connor & Netting, 2011). In turn, the idea of justice is appropriate, but the idea of freedom was, unfortunately, is alien to Plato. In addition, Plato specifies the ideal of justice is extremely speculatively without relying on real facts (O’Connor & Netting, 2011). Thus, the ideological basis of Platonic thought is highly commendable as it is impossible to imagine modern society without implications from Platonic society. Nowadays, it is essential to consider the ideas and ideals of Plato related to the community organization. As for Plato’s errors, they should be adjusted to modern knowledge, and there is no need to fol