Introduction: Looking into the Essence of the Argument Since the dawn of the human race, people have been concerned with the existence of a supernatural being that they own their lives to. With God being the supreme creature, everything else is believed to be His doing and, therefore, having a specific purpose. The given statement, though, raises many questions concerning the purpose of the things and phenomena that are generally considered useless, as well as the things and phenomena that produce objectively deteriorating effect on the universe and its elements. Thesis statement: Since the purpose of certain elements of the universe can be questioned or has not yet been discovered by people, it can be argued that the teleological argument should be considered the ultimate truth. As it has been stated above, a number of objects and phenomena do not seem to have their own purpose – or, to be more exact, their purpose quite hard to define. The given state of affairs is quite natural, since people do not possess absolute knowledge. However, the absence of the necessary links between certain objects can shake one’s convictions concerning the Creationist postulates. Taking the Argument with a Grain of Salt: Concerning the Existing Objections To address the issue in question in the most efficient way, the existing contradictions to the teleological argument must be considered. Taking a closer look at the objections to the ideas offered above, one can see the complexity of the issue in question. Natural selection and the existing biological complexity The idea that every single element depends on another one and cannot work properly without it, which the teleological argument is based on, does not seem so legit when considering the fact that the process of natural selection is generally considered inadequate. Therefore, the given idea presupposes that a number of creatures develop organs that do not seem to have any purpose or specific function in their bodies. One of the most graphic examples of the given statement is the fact that in complex organs, every element alone is useless, yet when all of them are out together, they start a clockwork process. Where logics fails: the inconsistencies of the universe design Another peculiar idea to be considered is Kant’s conclusion that God’s existence is not a predicate. There is no point in mentioning how many misconceptions the given statement spawned and how many of them remain unresolved even now. One of the most notorious questions is whether Kant meant predicate as a grammatical or philosophical unit (Moore). However, the way in which Moore puts the solution to the problem, i.e., the idea that God’s existence does not add anything to the context in which people understand existence, presupposes that the existence of the rest of the objects and phenomena cannot be considered as filled with purpose. Exploring the Links between the Elements of the Universe: Responses to the Objections Even though the objections listed above seem quite legitimate, they can also seem doubtful when the opposing opinions are considered. Natural selection and the existing biological complexity Weirdly enough, natural selection can also be the proof that the teleological argument is true. As a matter of fact, even Darwin, who is believed to have shak