Introduction Recently, a suitcase has taken place in the USA, and the results have been widely broadcast among the States. The suitcase participants were the University of Wisconsin-Madison, on the one hand, and the Apple Corporation, on the other. The university, the side that filled in the suit, was able to win the court and obtain a significant sum of money. In this paper, after demonstrating the point of the situation, we will provide some ethical considerations related to this case and numerous similar cases that undoubtedly take place throughout the world. The Crux of the Situation The situation that occurred is related to the fact that Apple had for some time been using a special piece of technology patented by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) of the University of Wisconsin-Madison (Chung par. 1-3). The company of Apple did not buy the patent and get the proper authorization from its owner, but still was using the device to improve the value of their products. The piece of technology that was being used by Apple is a microchip that enhances the efficiency of computer processors (Woollaston par. 14). The microchip was patented by the University in 1998 (Condliffe par. 1). But Apple illegally utilized this microchip while creating their iPhones and iPads during 2013 and 2014; in particular, the piece of technology was utilized in the Apple’s A7, A8, and A8X processors, the ones which were used in several versions of the iPad, and in the iPhones 5s, 6, and 6+ (Reuter’s par. 6). When WARF of the University of Wisconsin discovered this, they sued the business giant to be able to get some financial compensation for their loss. Fung states that Apple was initially sued for approximately $400 million of compensation (par. 2). On the other hand, it appears that the university was able to win only $234 million in the lawsuit (Dzimwasha par. 1). The sum might seem large from the university’s perspective, but it is pointed out that Apple was able to get a daily net profit of approximately $134.7 million during the first six months of 2015; this means that the lost lawsuit will cost Apple only nearly 42 hours of profit (Clover par. 6). Therefore, it appears after all that, even despite the court’s ruling and the lost case, Apple did not take major losses due to the illegal usage of the patented product. It is also important to remember that the use of the technology which enhanced the company’s product did not only make the product more expensive, it also added to the reputation of the company, and, therefore, yielded even more profits for the industrial giant. Ethical Problems Related to the Issue It is clear that the whole situation with Apple clandestinely using the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s patented product raises several ethical issues. One might say that the business’s attempt to get more profit this way should be considered outrageous. Indeed, large corporations are often the first ones to complain about the breaches of intellectual rights. To be more precise, their intellectual rights. They know that these rights bring tremendous profits to them, and they protect them fiercely. But it appears that Apple has rather double standards (and, quite probably, many other major businesses, too; for insta