Very often, the word Asians is used to refer to people who may come from Korea, Japan, or China. Moreover, it is sometimes assumed that they represent a group that is homogeneous in terms of cultural values, political beliefs, or attitudes. This is one of the main misconceptions that should be avoided while discussing these countries. This paper is aimed at determining whether Korea, China, and Japan are similar or different from one another. In particular, it is necessary to examine the cultural and educational dimensions, since they can help a person understand the relations among these countries. Moreover, one should speak about the political culture of these nations. Much attention should be paid to the impact of Confucianism on these countries and the role of individuality in these cultures. Overall, it is possible to argue that unlike Japan and Korea, Chine be described as a more collectivist society in which Confucian values continue to influence the functioning of the educational system and the interactions between people. These are the main arguments that should be elaborated in greater detail. When discussing these countries, one should first examine the role of Confucianism, since this philosophical system affected the development of these nations. There are various principles that are incorporated into this ethical teaching. First of all, according to Confucianism, the perfection of the world can be achieved, provided that a person strives to eliminate his/her own flaws (Goldin 5). To a great extent, this moral teaching urges a person to reflect upon one’s own errors (Goldin 5). More importantly, Confucianism implies that the society should be governed by people who have acquired wisdom (Goldin 5). The main issue is that this ethical theory does not encourage a person to take part in the active protest against the state or the existing social hierarchy. This is one of the main details that should be considered since it is helpful for understanding the differences between these nations. The state ideology of China has not always been driven by Confucianism. Nevertheless, Chine culture is traditionally associated with this system of philosophy (Kang 26). Furthermore, China did not attempt to impose Confucianism on Korea or Japan because this state did not want to become a global empire (Kang 26). However, these countries were willing to use the cultural heritage of China for their own purposes (Kang 26). Overall, it is possible to argue that Confucianism was partly accepted in Japan, but it was only one of the philosophical traditions. More importantly, in Japan, the government was controlled by people who represented the warrior culture. In many cases, they did not accept the Confucian notion of literati or scholars who should represent the state. In contrast, in Korea, the power was assumed by people who claimed the title of scholars or sages. These are some of the main distinctions that should be considered. Admittedly, the supporters of Confucianism can be found in each of these three countries. Nevertheless, its legacies are particularly influential in China and Korea. This is one of the aspects that can be identified. Additionally, it is important to remember about the role of education in these states. In each of these countries, students are required to meet high educational standards.