The U.S. presidential powers have been increasing exponentially without constitutional appreciation leading to imbalance of powers between legislature and executive. This is undermining the initial notions of whom the president ought to be as defined during the foundation of the president’s powers. During the foundation of the president’s powers, the president’s powers rested on his leadership prowess but not the formal powers. On the other hand, Senates role was to make laws and control actions of the president. Consequently, the two bodies were supposed to have equal powers. However, with the shifting of presidential powers and roles one wonders where the Senate or Supreme Court hides instead of controlling him. 1 In the U.S., Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court plays similar role of the legislature. 2 Consequently, they can easily abuse their power if not checked. In response, the constitution makers set series of checkers that ensures the three powerful branches check each others powers. Hence, the power balance spreads down to another institution and in the U.S., any entity, whether Senate versus the House of Representative; the states in opposition to federal government; or government powers against the right of citizens, has equal domination as defined in the Bill of Right. 3 Nevertheless, the constitution draft was an incomplete contract that was supposed to administer a nation. It therefore fails to specify clear decisions needed under all contingencies. Instead, it gives mandate to the three organs: the president, Congress and Supreme Court, of overseeing powers and jurisdiction. 4 Moreover, it provides a general framework to the president on how to deal with contingencies and making public decisions. In reality, the plan of the constitution was to bring in a power struggle among the entities and they end up checking themselves. However, it fails to give details and clarity on how each organ is supposed to have its share of the powers of the legislature. Hence, the determination of legislative power has shifted to rest on other fate like politics where the president is a huge actor. 5 As a result, despite the lack of single hand controlling the legislature, the president has become powerful over the years in attempts to establish legacies in a short ruling. In addition, the president is highly favored by the working environment when compared to Congress. For instance, the president acts independently to ensure the laws are enacted faithfully and in case the congress wants to restrain president’s actions, they can only do that through writing statutes. 6 To write statute is costly, time consuming because it requires court orders and needs summoning a team of delegate. In some instances, these delegations fail. For example, when the delegation is extensive, the president’s powers act at their maximum. Additionally, the president has the power to veto any legislation and in case he does it, the matter becomes too hard on Congress to reverse or override. Moreover, when the new statute passes, it makes the president more responsible and more controlling. As a result, the president’s powers are more like a manager and that of congress fits the boots of employee who faithfully follows manager’s orders. 7 In general, the congress is poorly set to defend its interest and has a general problem of it being a collection that is hard to coherent. 8 As a result, de