The current report is devoted to the levels of word consideration and comprehension. The researches of the recalling words are regarded in the presented report. It is necessary to mention, that the regarded researches had been held by the four mutually independent laboratories, and the summary of these four papers reflect the most objective results, thus increasing the value of the present report. Since ancient times, intangible arrangements have played essential role in the creation of knowledge administration submissions. Instantiations of these involve extremely distinguished ontologies, less prescribed taxonomic arrangements and, even less formal, groups of descriptors having intuitively similar explanations. The research on the issues of recall of the words is regarded as one of the vital importance, and can be considered essential contribution to the development of psychological science in general, and to the subdivision of psychology related to memory in particular. It is necessary to mention, that all these theoretical arrangements can provide probable advantages for a growing number of submissions, their structure necessitates a valuably modeling action, a difficulty characteristically submitted to as the knowledge attainment tailback. As for the recall of the words, it is usually considered, that for such research it is necessary to adopt the approach described in Cimiano et al. (2005), which is encouraged by the Distributional Hypothesis. The Distributional Hypothesis claims that terms are semantically analogous to the degree to which they share comparable syntactic backgrounds. This signifies that, if two words happen to be in analogous contexts, they are regarded as the words which have a similar meaning. A syntactic context may be, for instance, a verb for which the term in question occurs as topic or purpose. For this reason, for each term in difficulty, we extort syntactic surface reliances from the mass. These surface reliances are executed by matching texts linked with part–of–speech data against a documentation of prototypes encoded as usual terms. Note that the current advance is linked to the Generalized Vector Space Model (Wong et al., 1985) but uses syntactic features instead of plain occurrences of words in documents. We report on the held work analyzes the experiment with the two different methodologies and algorithms of counting up the results, such as recall of the clustered words and the words united into groups on the one hand, and with absolutely non-systematized words on the other hand. The research is claimed to propose an advance for the estimation of this and linked advances and detailed on investigational results for a dataset for the memory sphere of psychology. The results indicate that clustering using grouping of the words is more adjusted for our purposes although it has been pointed out that clustering in groups has the sufficient merit of having less parameterization, which makes it simpler to use. In further works, it will be possible to aim the researches at using unconventional soft clustering advances, probably with the combination of the methods used in the current one. As both algorithms share the same stages, this seems absolutely ration