In 1997, the Australian mental health team developed the principles of mental health services for their promotion and guiding in the country. In the guidelines and policies accepted, they paid much attention to reducing seclusion and restrictions to patients that had to be minimal. This newly adopted politics was one of the measures of high priority to nurses and other staff members (Muralidharan, 2006). Restraint is an outside control method used to limit, reduce or even prevent movement of a person, in particular a patient, from one place to another. It is mainly done to stop the patient from inflicting harm to themselves or to others. Generally, there are two types of restraint. The first one is called physical restraint and involves application of external force to prevent a patient from inducing pain or injury to themselves or other people, as well as to avoid harmful situations. The second one is a mechanical restraint that refers to the act of persons’ containment with the help of mechanical tools. It may include the use of such appliances like asbelts, straps, and sheets for limiting free movement of a patient’s body and making him or her become harmless (Muir-Cochrane, Holmes, & Walton, 2002). Seclusion refers to the act of putting patients away from other people in an isolated place, where chances of exit are minimal or non-existent. Seclusion should be performed within the minimum time possible, as any delay may lead to disastrous repercussions on a patient’s health. The use of restraint and seclusion is one of the most challenging ideas and practices that have been applied in mental hospitals in various countries globally (Muralidharan, 2006). However, the practice has generated many debates in various legal and professional forums about how safe it is for people. Although seclusion and restraint could be observed in many countries, the process of evaluating their application is hindered by the lack of research and consistent clinical guidelines and policies. By and large, these methods should only be utilised as the last resort to emergency situations. From the three case studies reviewed, it is obvious that restraint and seclusion methods are not the best way to treat patients. The first patient said such treatment only escalated his emotions, thus causing him a great pain. The second patient also testified that these methods only make him have flashbacks about his father, thus causing him more harm than good. Finally, the third patient asserted that these methods make her feel angrier and more anxious. Therefore, from the three reports above, it is clear that neither restraint nor seclusion could be viewed as the best method to use on patients (Muir-Cochrane et al., 2002). In the first place, the following recommendations can help patients develop good practices without involving restraint and seclusion. First and foremost, it is important that safety measures be taken to ensure that the methods under consideration are reduced at all levels of mental patients’ problems. This would involve elimination of restraint and seclusion completely. In addition, nurses should be trained to provide safe guidance to patients, including safe working environments. Nevertheless, these methods should not be used unless on unavoidable circumstances only (Muralidharan, 2006). With the help of educated nurses, such instances can be avoided i