Introduction Religion is believed to be a systematized compilation of beliefs, traditions, and world analysis that link humanity to religion and to ethical principles at times. A number of people have the belief that religion can only take place in churches, temples, or any other place that spiritual get-together takes place. In the real sense, religion is intrinsic within several characteristics of the society, and that religious way of life unavoidably affects several areas, for instance, political, economical, and ethics in culture. This paper will be addressing the fundamentalism of religion, its influence on politics, its determination in social class, and differentiation of religious expression in gender. The Influence of Religion on Politics A society can stay free with the correct political arrangement. However, this will not be enough. Its efficiency crucially relies on the broader perspectives of culture and communal contexts. Religion matters in politics, as it is a powerful tool when it comes to shaping of culture in terms of good and evil. Conservatives frequently uphold that a powerfully religious society stands more appropriate when it comes to being loyal to freedom ideals. As claimed by Johnstone, religion provides two ideal advantages. It stands out as a foundation that is firm for moral disposition and personal dependability thus instilling honesty, self-discipline, and self-reliance to citizens. Secondly, the citizens are so less probable to be lured to enhance themselves at the outlay of their fellow citizens through government intimidation (Johnstone 92). In addition, religion provides morals as the only option to the nations’ authority consequently acting as a rein on governmental enhancement. Conservatives recurrently conclude that the governmental administration of a liberated society should engage in active procedures that will help in the promoting and strengthening of religion. This conclusion is however disagreed by many even if the premise is acceptable. Religious Fundamentalism The word fundamentalism is applicable to several religious groups, for instance, Christians, Hindus, and Buddhists to mention a few. The term is also applicable to some of the secular groups both economical and environmental though all of them are different. According to Putnam and Campbell, fundamentalism patents itself as an effort by overwhelmed believers to discover their asylum in supporting themselves with an individuality that is entrenched as a past golden era whose individuality is preceded by an effort to reinstate that golden history (245). Fundamentalism in every religion symbolizes a thrust back against several forms of exterior burden and a reflective panic of destruction habitually at the hands of the current secularists. The disjointing of religious beliefs and political affairs may be regarded as natural to the societies in the West except it is never the set of circumstances in scores of other cultures. The connection between religious beliefs and political affairs in the western societies has been an aggressive one in the past. It took centuries to solve. For this basis, Putnam and Campbell wrote that secularism has frequently had unenthusiastic consequences if cultures lacked secularizing time (324). For instance, Gamal Abdel Nasser had the idea of separating religious beliefs and