Introduction “Among the issues of today that are conflict-ridden and inflammatory, none is so great as the battle over abortion . It has increased over the years, and seems it will become even greater in the days ahead (Stoll, 1994-2007)”. Main text Two warring movements the “pro-life” and the “pro-choice” endlessly voice out their support on each ideal. The “pro-lifers” (Robinson, 2007) feel that abortion should be restricted to special cases or prohibited completely. They believe that human life begins at conception. Thus abortion murders a baby. Many of them promote support services for women in crisis pregnancies and or seek legal restrictions on abortion. While “pro-choicers” believe that each woman should be free to follow their own ethical beliefs concerning the termination or continuation of pregnancy. They believe that human life begins later in pregnancy. They promote better comprehensive birth control education in schools and greater access to contraceptives. Even Christians are divided over how to address the issue from the Biblical perspective. We know that Christians are composed of three congregations: the Protestants, Roman Catholics, and Those who believe in the Bible, it is clear that the Bible is straightforward on life, that is that God is the giver of life, and the taker away of life. Only God has the authority over the creative act and its demise. Anything less than this principle is against Biblical injunctions. In countries like the United States, pro-life and pro-choice are both powerful and active. Pro-life groups are particularly active at the state level and have successfully influenced legislators into creating many laws that restrict abortion. In Canada, pro-life movement has lost most of its funding after some groups started to harass abortion providers in the vicinity of their homes. They also terrorized the families and neighbors of the providers. However, in Australia, the FPWA a pro-choice organization supports women’s right to safe, legal and affordable abortion and believes that appropriate medical services for advice on pregnancy and for the provision of termination of pregnancy are essential components of effective health services for women. They believe that surgical termination performed by qualified health professionals should be removed from criminal code in all states and territories of Australia. In May 1998 an Act to amend the abortion laws in both the WA Health Act and the Criminal Code was passed, and Western Australian women can now safely and legally obtain an abortion without the threat of prosecution (FPWA, 2007).We are aware that there are many conflicting beliefs about abortion. A minority of public believes that a woman should be free to terminate her pregnancy at any stage and for any reason that she feels to be valid. Some feel that she should be able to choose to terminate the life of the pre-embryo, embryo, or fetus for any reason up to a certain point in gestation but not afterward. Some would only allow legal abortions in one or more of the following situations: If an abortion is needed to save the life of the woman; to prevent the woman from experiencing permanent disability; to prevent the woman from having serious health problems; when the fetus is so malforme