Introduction One is crazy when in love is a conceptual statement that has been propagated and advanced by developing theories. There have been attempts by scientists to prove the ‘chemistry’ that is often termed to be associated with one falling in love. What usually happens is so mysterious that someone could suddenly fall in love so helplessly with someone random and materialize into one living happily together, but sometimes love does not last long. There has been several attempts to distinguish what is commonly referred to as love from lust and some other feelings that could be mistakenly be taken to be love (Freud, 2007). There is a lot of evidence form biology, psychology, and experimental psychology with fanciful speculations of how love is conceptualized. Thoughtful theories by philosophers have, however, advanced the compelling evidence on the speculations of how one is crazy when in love. Theories Freud and Jung Freud founded a unitary principle that he believed determined the entire course of human nature and development, which was also to a large extent facilitated further by Jung. He believed that the instinctive development of love was based on four different ways; as a fusion of sexuality and affection, as an inhibitor of libidinal energy, as life’s basic instinct of all humanity, and as the total life force that progresses life to death. Freud suggests that love begins to show since the stages of infanthood as the newborn bonds with the mother during breastfeeding. At this stage, as Freud posits, the child attains a confluence that can only be satisfied in that situation (Fraley & Shaver, 2000). At this stage, the baby’s instincts of love are ignited towards the mother, who is the first object of love the child ever knows. This child, therefore, experiences the first sexual sensation that tunes the bodily functions required for self-preservation. According to Freud, the onset of child development is the beginning of sexual syntheses. The child starts showing the relationship between sensuality and affectionate feelings during infant years. For instance, the child may cry for the mother’s breasts, or the child may show excitement when the child is having time with other family members other than the mother (Morf & Rhodewalt, 2003). With time, the sexual impulse starts shifting from the self-attraction to being attracted to other objects. This causes the ego to be in conflict with sexual impulses. Jung Jung disagrees with the scientific evidence showing that intimacy is scientific programming. He does not categorize his preposition on the basis that man is scientifically programmed and, therefore, anything coming from man must have an element of science. Freud propagated the unique characteristic of humans, partly acknowledging the unique genetic composition of man. Freud’s concept of love is, therefore, founded on certain pragmatic philosophical foundations that one must understand to understand Freud (Leary & Hoyle, 2009). Jung presupposes that the ultimate development is extended beyond family, to friendships, and to bonding successfully with larger groups and objects. At the same time, sexual energy develops towards a given individual or a given object. The society is made up of sexual impulses drawn towards objects and other persons (Banai, Shaver, & Mikulince