Problem Identification Organizational development depends on the ability of the company to identify and solve most of its problems. As training based organization, Al Shaheen L.L.C Company faces many problems, especially those related to a change in curriculum and instruction in the work setting (Al – Shaheen, 2011). The major problem facing the company is the increase in technological complexity of the organization. Notably, the technical problems arise from goal setting, leadership and communication in the company (Hoy & Hoy, 2009). Since training is a very important aspect of the organizational development, it is important for the company to develop an internal mechanism of dealing with technical complexity and other operation uncertainties (Al – Shaheen, 2011). Research Theories Related to the Problem Technical complexity is a very difficult problem to solve as most consultants and researchers would agree that the normal technical support in the company is critical to the organizational success (Hoy & Hoy, 2009). Product customization, consulting and training are the main recommended ways of offering solution to the problems affecting the organization. Perhaps, this is the reason explaining Al Shaheen’s interest in offering experienced training and encouraging development business (Al – Shaheen, 2011). As a service sector, the research theories related to the problem of technical complexity include the industry lifecycle and its evolution theory because they play a very significant role in explaining technical complexity in the organization (Hoy & Hoy, 2009). It is through understanding the relevant theories that one would be able to identify and intervene in solving the organizational problems. The company was categorical in explaining the distinction between operations involving the organization’s product and other training services, which it offered. Apparently, this could propel the organization to exploit the services for financial gain (Hoy & Hoy, 2009). Particularly, the company had the knowledge that innovation was the key aspect of product development, thus it had to incline its training towards a more innovative approach than mere theoretical aspects. Considering the industry lifecycle theory, it is apparent that the organizations become complex as they develop into different life stages (Cheung-Judge & Holbeche, 2011). Each complete cycle in the organization’s system presents a stage in its development and gives rise to certain degree of complexity in the manner in which the company’s affairs are run. For instance, as the company assets, products and services loom large, running the affairs becomes complex. Therefore, it needs a pragmatic design that allows industry dynamics to interplay and create a competitive environment based on cost and technological advancement (Hoy & Hoy, 2009). On industrial evolution theory, the research indicated that the firm’s dynamics are based on consumer demands. This means that the company would only invest in areas where the demand is high (Hoy & Hoy, 2009). As the industrial services evolve, the company is also compelled to shift its services to tailor with the changing customer requirements and evolution of technological invention. Mostly, evolution of techno