Assignment The internet is one of the most significant element of modern era. It has shaped how communication, thinking, and problem solving is done in the last couple of decades. There are various industries and fields that have been positively impacted by the growth of the internet. It is important to note that in the beginning, the internet was not viewed as a significant part of daily life as it is today. In fact, some of the biggest critics of the amount of freedom the internet allows today, legislators, were the ones who shaped the industry. This is according to Kosseff (2019) who argues that two legislators, namely Chris Cox, a republican and Ron Wyden, a democrat promoted the nature of the internet as it is today. This tis due to the twenty-six words they used to describe the use of the internet under Section 230 of the Communications Act. This essay looks into the different aspects and implications of Section 230, particularly the mentioned twenty-six words, on the growth and use of the internet. First, the essay looks into the legal and political significance of the clause. For example, one of the legal the clause has been debated by congress over the last couple of decades due to the fact that it protects large IT firms from any harm that might emanate from content that is posted by their users or other third parties. Additionally, the essay looks at the relationship between laws such as the First Amendment, Libel and Copyright and Section 230 of the Communications Act. The essay suggests that whereas there are several limitations to Section 230 of the Communications Act, congress should not repel it but rather, modify it to hold users and interactive digital platform owners more accountable for content shared on these online platforms. Legal and Political Significance of Section 230 of the Communications Act Legal Significance There are several legal and political significances of Section 230 of the Communications Act. First, for legal, the Section means that digital platform providers cannot be held liable for comments, videos and images that other people post on their digital sites (Goodman & Whittington, 2019). An example can be given to simplify the legislation. When a Facebook user updates a disturbing video or post, the courts, or any other person, cannot hold Mark Zuckerberg accountable for that specific post or image. As mentioned, Kosseff (2019) strongly believes that this clause, which he refers to the twenty-six words, created the internet. One of the implications of this legal significance is that it protects digital platform providers. Ideally, there is no way they can manage all the data that is shared on their platforms. Additionally, due to the diversity of the internet, the providers were not, initially, able to fully monitor individual activities. Today, this has changed as algorithms have been created to identify different types of content that users see on these platforms. It is important to note that other users who share or even like content shared by third parties can also not be held accountable for that same content. The said algorithms now advice users on the type of content they are about to see. Additionally, the user has the right to watch the content or skip it entirely. It is crucial to point out that the users ca