What is the research problem? The title of the article is: “Stigma and Status: The Interrelation of Two Theoretical Perspectives.” It is a peer-reviewed article that was authored by Jeffrey W. Lucas and Jo C. Phelan. Based on the MLA citation style, the article can be cited as Lucas, Jeffrey W., and Jo C. Phelan. “Stigma and Status: The Interrelation of Two Theoretical Perspectives.” Social Psychology Quarterly 75.4 (2012): 310-333. Print. Addressing mental orientation problems requires the knowledge of the process that results in each orientation. The article presents experimental research that seeks to establish how different mental orientations are developed in people. These orientations are stigma and status. Of greater interest by the researchers is the need to establish the processes that result in each of the orientations. The paper addresses the problem of determining the sets of social, mental, and physical attributes that result in either stigma or the attainment of status. It makes it easy to deal with the problems that germinate from these mental orientations. The research also expounds on the aspects of social exclusion and how inclusion can be attained in social interaction. Theoretical Foundation: What theory is being tested? What are the main concepts? Which of the theoretical perspectives in social psychology is the author using? One interesting thing in this research is that it tries to bridge two theoretical perspectives. The article tests the validity of the status characteristics theory. It is a critical theory when it comes to the exploration of different mental and physical orientations in people and how behaviors are developed during the interaction. Research concerning stigma and status tends to focus on different social features. Therefore, this research seeks to breach the gap that prevails in research through the development of conclusions that can help in exploring status and stigma beyond the confines of literature and past research. The research integrates two critical social concepts; the stigma process and the status process. Status is derived from the status characteristics theory. The reason why the researchers focus on the two concepts is that the sets of behaviors and processes that define the orientations are widely documented in the literature. Here, the interest of the researchers is to go beyond the existing classification of characters and processes to ascertain the change in the factors that determine the orientations. In this research, the authors deploy different theoretical perspectives on social psychology. The first theoretical perspective that has been used in this paper is the sociocultural perspective. The researchers try to understand how behaviors or social and mental orientations can be developed in different social contexts. Processes that result in behavior often emanate from the sociocultural contexts in which individuals dwell. Based on this observation, it can be argued that the search for processes that go into the development of stigma and status are molded around certain social and cultural contexts in which behaviors are generated. The researchers have also deployed the learning theory perspective