Human communication is a complex process which involves social and psychological mechanisms. Communication is made up largely of the talking that people do when they get together. Contemporary communication proposes different explanations and understanding of human communication and its mechanisms. To explain the nature of the subject, the paper will be based on three communication theories, FIRO theory by William Schutz, Groupthink developed by Irving Janis, social exchange theory by John Thibaut & Harold Kelley, and proxemic theory by Edward Hall. In general, definitions of “communication” fall into two broad categories. In one category are those definitions which limit the process of communication to those stimulus-response situations in which one deliberately transmits stimuli to evoke response. In the other category are those definitions that include within the area of communication stimulus-response situations in which there need not be any intention of evoking response in the transmission of the stimuli (West and Turner 2006). The second category obviously overlaps the first. West and Turner (2006) state that when someone gains certain impressions of someone else the latter is communicating something to the former. The importance and value of viewing communication as response become apparent. It is evident from the classification and application of the definitions that in the first category the concept of the process of communication is from the point of vie of the transmitter of stimuli, and in the second category, from the point of view of the person responding (Littlejohn and Foss 2007). Looking at the process of communication from the transmitter’s point of view provides the most obvious method of delimiting the area of behavior to be treated as communication, and consequently simplifies the problem of definition. If someone is transmitting stimuli for the purpose of evoking response there is communication; otherwise there is none (West and Turner 2006). William Schutz underlines that needs are the main drivers of communication. He tested the hypothesis that persons with different but complementary patterns on certain personality characteristics are most compatible, hence make the most effective groups. Following Griffin (1991); “FIR0 is an elaborate theory of interpersonal needs that claims to account for both the what and the why of an individual’s actions toward others. According to Schutz, all humans possess three needs to a greater or lesser degree. They are the needs for inclusion, control, and affection”. FIRO theory ( Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation ) developed in 1958 is based three human needs: (1) need for inclusion, (2) need for control, (3) need for affection. Schutz combined pairs of people in terms of the strength of their needs to give and to receive inclusion (belongingness), control, and affection. The compatible pairs were those in which member A had a high need to give inclusion, control, and/or affection to others, while member B had a high need to receive inclusion, control, and/or affection. He compared such compatible groups with pairs in which the two members had similar patterns of these needs (for example, both members had high needs to give affectio