Proper response Lisa Baxter’s response to his challenges was good. Whenever she was harassed by her senior managers, her conscience remained focused. An immediate response to challenges would have risked her job. She did so well to remain herself whenever men harassed her. Additionally, failure to give in to any advances or threats was her well show of character. However, she ought to have raised an alarm when she was being harassed. This would have created awareness about women’s harassment within the firm. Proper response, courage, effective timing of communication and comfort are important aspects of leadership. After Baxter reported her senior management nothing seemed to happen. This is due to male chauvinism. Senior managers could not take action against fellow men. Also, this might have been due to the fact that the reported senior manager holds an important position in the firm. If I was in the position of Baxter, I would advocate that women within the firm should cry out whenever faced with any form of harassment. However, in her position as a senior manager, I would push for legislation of rules to stop women’s harassment. Baxter’s experience shows that it is important to be patient. Voice is power when required. When Baxter raised harassment issues, no more harassment to the junior staff happened. Sometimes it is important to take a risk. This is evident from Baxter’s failure to give in to the advances yet she did not lose anything. It is important to take your time before you raise a concern. This gives time to handle the issue at hand. On priorities, it is important to have clear priorities when in leadership. An individual personal or career development faces many challenges. These challenges are mainly gender-based and from senior managers. Organizational development depends on issues raised within a firm. Any firm will develop after handling challenges facing its management. Courage Baxter’s response at the team building retreat was bad. The situation at the entrance required an immediate response which she failed to offer. Baxter was able to redeem herself by pursuing the issue later. Here, she did well to inform the senior manager of his shortcomings. In my own opinion, Baxter would have performed better if she raised her voice at the entrance instead of holding the issue to a later date. Immediate response at the entrance would have won support from other workers. Here, the senior manager would have acted responsibly. It is easy to force a decision when it is still in its current form. Baxter’s decision not to speak is a sign of cowardice. The decision to handle the matter later, offline and on one basis shows that Baxter could not handle the pressure. If the matter would have been raised immediately, there would be reactions to support or oppose the decision. Therefore, Baxter’s decision was informed by her worry to handle pressure from either side. This is why she chose to handle the senior manager alone at a later date. The two choices are not compatible. In the first case, a solution would be offered immediately. In the second case, there was no solution offered because it was upon the judgment of the senior manager. Baxter’s manager requested help because he