Population development is intended to eradicate poverty and the fight against its feminization, the spread of which in society leads to a situation where women have relatively fewer resources, including income, property, assets than men. In the general image of impoverishment, the status of women is the most complex. The problem of female poverty is exacerbated by hidden discrimination, an inadequate safety net, which brings its aggravation. The fact of the poverty feminization can be observed through the number of women being in socially vulnerable groups, sectoral segregation, in other words, the predominance of women in low-paid sectors, and the increase in the level of women unemployment. Households faced with natural disasters or economic recession had to take action to manage the fallouts from the crisis. Primarily they focused on the responses that did not come at the cost of the productive household base and did not reduce economic indicators. According to Kabeer, these might include laying off the number of meals, loan facilities, removing or denying treatment, depleting household storages, taking children out of school, and temporary migration on a job search (196). Reduced consumption occurred more often due to women’s expense than men as women’s goods were sold off in the first place (Kabeer, 197). In extreme cases of impoverishment, employable males quit family, leaving women to look after the very young and aged. Sometimes women were forced to migrate to cities to earn money and to leave their children in shelters (Kabeer, 197). Meanwhile, the second-order effect leads to the phenomenon of added workers: women agreed to work for lower wages to meet the basic needs of the household. It has resulted in growing female labor force participation in conditions of high unemployment or underemployment. With regard to policies that could address these effects, there are some categories of responses. The first is the growth of women’s employment, which might balance the ratio of earners to eligible dependent (Kabeer 198). According to Chants, the other tool is the fight with preconception in the workplace with the assistance of policy measures, namely law compliance (189). Furthermore, another effective method is raising awareness within the family, especially among girls and female family members, to solve the problem of gender equality and the empowerment of women. Girl Effect is an independent, non-profit organization created in September 2015; it focuses on the belief that with a given opportunity, girls can bring their countries out of poverty. It was founded by Nike Foundation, which presented the idea and purposes at the World Economic Forum in Davos. From this point onward, the organization has been criticized and accused of the duplicity of its actions. According to Heiken, the company caused some harm to the female population in developing countries (1366). The financial progress is associated with a reduction in the gender gap in higher education. It helps narrow educational gaps by freeing up time from household work and providing a safer school environment. Heiken argues that the IMF does not endeavor to combat illiteracy and lack of qualified medical care since it cuts back the budget share to develop these domains (1366). “The widespread unemployment caused by the 2008 financial crisis – of which Goldman Sachs was a primary driver – continues to negatively affect women’s livelihood