Nowadays, drug and related property seizures can be discovered as the main law enforcement instruments not only to prevent drug trafficking but also to generate additional revenues to support the functioning of the police. This type of regulation helped law enforcement agencies fill their gaps in budgeting and develop a new punishment. Nonetheless, this law tends to have some drawbacks since the property or vehicle can be seized even if it does not belong to the suspect directly, such as a rented car or apartment. In turn, the concepts of constructive possession may add difficulties to the investigation process, as they create scenarios that may only possibly incur, such as a driver can be aware of drugs in his/her car. A combination of these factors states that legislation covering drug and property seizure has to be revised while taking into account a diverse range of circumstances to avoid conflicts and false accusations. Nowadays, apart from the well-developed and constantly revised legislation, issues with illegal drugs continue to exist. For example, drug abuse is still one of the major problems since it has a negative effect on the health and mental condition of individuals, while prescription drugs can also be viewed as threats (McHugh, Nielsen, & Weiss, 2015). The rising popularity of drugs worldwide requires continuing the development of the legal framework, and after the completion of a drug arrest, the law enforcement agency can seize property such as automobile or house. Consequently, the primary goal of the paper is to review different cases of drug seizures, describe associated procedures to collect witness-related evidence and investigative techniques and express my opinion about this aspect. In the end, conclusions are drawn to summarize the main findings of the paper. In the first place, the primary reasons for the development of property seizures were linked to financial purposes. In this case, arresting apartments, houses, and vehicles not only reduced drug activity but also generated additional revenues for the police department (Bridy, 2014). This matter helped fill the existent financial gaps, as civil forfeiture assisted in maintaining a law enforcement agency and its operations at the relevant levels, and it helped decrease dramatically escalating percentage of crimes. Nonetheless, as it was depicted earlier, different situations might incur during the arrest of the property. Thus, before entering the property that can potentially help the investigation, the search warrant has to be received, while entering without it is only possible in some exemptions (Signorelli, 2016). Following these rules will help avoid violations of confidentiality and privacy and find relevant evidence to support the investigation. Generally speaking, one of the most common situations is the fact that the apartment is rented. According to the law, property seizure depends on a plethora of factors. For example, a landlord did not terminate a contract after noticing drug activity and or start collecting supporting evidence to evict a tenant (Brown & Rosenquest, 2017). It could be said that the landlord broke the law and could be considered as an actor