The similarities and the differences between Roman and Etruscan art An analysis of Roman and Etruscan art reveals significant similarities in specific defining features that characterized their forms of expression. Given the huge influence that Etruscan art had on Roman art, significant similarities existed in their development of realistic portraits of influential figures (Bonfante 138). Both cultures sculpted portraits that capture the facial and other features of the individual of choice with incredible precision. The two cultures’ uptake and advancement of metalwork also reveal another similarity following their perfection in the development of coins and ornaments (Bonfante 140). Finally, Roman architecture also drew significant resemblance from that of the Etruscans concerning their design and construction of domelike structures. On the contrary, Roman art differed from Etruscan art on several crucial fronts, including their tombstone sculptures. While the Etruscans represented the dead in a retrospective approach that highlighted their previously lived experiences, the Romans employed a transitional approach that highlighted the lives of the deceased beyond death itself (Bonfante 145). Additionally, the two art forms differed in the sense that Roman art majorly depicted the sculptures of powerful figures while the Etruscans concentrated on sculptures and paintings denoting realistic images such as those wild animals. This distinction highlights the differences in the perspectives of the artists, given their unique depictions of the environments around them and the concepts to which they attached great significance. The Colosseum and the Pantheon architectural masterpieces of the Roman Empire: the techniques and the materials used to complete these iconic structures The sheer fact that The Colosseum, which still defines Rome’s landscape to this day, is a testament to the architectural prowess and capability of the Roman Empire. It is believed that the amphitheater could have been capable of admitting more than fifty thousand people when it commenced operations (Rose 22). The Colosseum boasted impressive Corinthian columns straddling four flours, which enhanced the building’s beauty. The presence of eighty entrances to the building including its underground passages speaks to the technical advancement of the Roman Empire during the reign of Emperor Vespasian (Rose 8). The Colosseum remains a significant engineering wonder, given its combination of stones and Roman concrete to enhance the strength of the arches. Tufo, which is a strong volcanic rock, cemented the inner walls of the structure in an effort to reduce weight while the seats were made of marble (García-Ruiz and Quiroga-Puerta 45). The Pantheon is another demonstration of the ingenuity of ancient Roman architects and engineers whose labor is still visible today. The building boasts of the coffered dome, which remains the tallest dome without any existing form of reinforcement. The dome’s ceiling design is essential for weight reduction, thereby enhancing its stability (Bonfante 157). The pantheon was similarly constructed using Roman concrete and travertine as the columns were erected through the applicatio