Introduction Bloodstain pattern analysis was used as a method of preliminary assessment of a crime scene long before the scientific approach has entered the field of forensics. Police and criminal investigators identified potential victims by the presence of bloodstains or drops on their clothing or bodies. Since then the process of visual analysis has sophisticated manifold and evolved into a separate field of practical study within forensic science. Recently, there has been a certain controversy among researchers and bloodstain analysis about the validity, reliability, and legal value of this method, which testifies to the relevance of examining blood spatter analysis in its application to a real-world case with implications drawn for modern forensics. Case Description The relatively modern case in which blood spatter analysis was of the essence to the prosecution was one of David Camm. At 9.30 p.m., Camm telephoned Sellersburg, Indiana State Police station and claimed that three members of his family, including his wife, Kimberly, son Brad, and daughter Jill were shot to death in the garage of their family house. As per the later commentary of Camm, he returned home after finishing his basketball match (where he spend the time from 7 p.m. till 9.20 p.m.) near the local church and found his wife dead on the floor of the garage (National Registry of Exonerations, 2013). He found his children inside the car in the backseat. As he added, he thought that his son Brad might still be alive, so he extracted him from the car and performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation on him with no result. At this point, he called the police. The police officers found Camm on the floor beside the victims. The daughter and mother were shot to the head, while the son was shot to the chest (National Registry of Exonerations, 2013). He was charged with the murder of three people and sentenced to a prison term of 195 years. The main evidence against him was the result of the blood spatter analysis performed on his shirt. Camm served 13 years being in the middle of legal action until his release and a drop of all charges in 2013 after a successful appeal to court (Davis, 2013). Bloodstain Pattern Analysis in the Case Unlike other similar cases, in this one, both prosecution and defense relied heavily on the evidence of bloodstain pattern analysis. During the investigation, criminal experts managed to find approximately 8 drops of blood on David Camm’s shirt. Prosecution bloodstain pattern analysts, Tom Bevel and Rod Englert claimed that these drops were high velocity spatter (David R. Camm v. the State of Indiana, 2009). They could only have gotten on the shirt as a result of a shot fired at close range or being in direct proximity to the victim at the time when the shot was fired. The defense, however, argued with such interpretation of the findings. Paul Kish, Stuart H. James, and others stated that the pattern might instead signify the fact that Camm’s shirt might have become stained with blood in that particular manner as a result of it brushing against Jill’s hair (David R. Camm v. the State of Indiana, 2009). The role of bloodstain analysis, in this case, was to determine if the defendant was guilty of murder. By attempting to reconstruct the tragic events, different analysts used empirical evidence and