Introduction The war between North and South Korea was mainly viewed as a silent tussle between capitalism, represented by the US and Communism, represented by the then Soviet Union and The people’s republic of China. The war which began in June 1950 lasted only 3 years and left in its wake an estimated 3,000,000 people dead, most of them civilians. Historians put a number of suggestions as to why the US, under President Harry Truman entered the war. These are: the growing concern over communism occasioned by the cold war, the Soviet intervention in some European countries such as Turkey and Greece and also the fact that they weren’t the only nation that possessed the atomic bomb anymore. (The Soviet Union had successfully experimented with it in 1949).As a result of the 3 year war, the whole of the Korean peninsula was completely bombarded. The country became even more divided along ideological lines as the Southerners became increasingly anticommunists, and the Northerners Choosing to let China play a major role in their rebuilding after the war, still supported communism. Scenarios of Possible Outcomes In 2002 the Bush administration leveled accusations against North Korea accusing Pyongyang of secretly having a highly enriched-uranium programme. From then till early 2003, Washington and Pyongyang were engaged in an exchange of words before China initiated calls for a diplomatic mediation to try and resolve the stalemate. The underlying issues that necessitated the mediation process can well be explained with an insight into one of the major players in the six party talks, China. Mediation It is easy to deduce that the Chinese really don’t want the situation to escalate into military violence as this would spell doom for the economic gains in Northeastern Asia and especially China. Also it is evident that the US would not hesitate to explore military options as in the case of Iraq, especially after the former US president labeled Kim Jong Il a tyrant. Strong mediation tactics as seen from China might in the long run succeed in making North Korea cede ground and provide concessions for a peaceful end to the crisis. Bearing in mind that North Korea is positioned in one of the most under institutionalized regions of the world, any mediator that engages the US and North Korea in direct bilateral talks is faced with a daunting task (Samuel, 2006). This might have had a more clear approach if North Korea had in place a constitution that reflected the will of the people and not that of the leadership (H5). Military confrontation However if at any rate the mediation process fails to address fully US concerns for North Korea to abandon its nuclear enrichment, military confrontation is very likely bearing in mind that North Korea would retaliate in a bid to ensure regime survival(H1). This would in turn pull other players (UK and China) who might be reluctant into the ensuing war (H2).Countries that have fragmented and individual civil societies are not likely to take sides as their political leadership fears suffering possible defeats in elections as a result of these civil societies sensitization of what is real to the people. This perhaps explains why the UK has cold feet ov