The process involved in the transformation of a bill into a law is quite intricate. Initially, legislation is introduced by any member of the Congress, received by the clerk and then passed on to the Senate/House which acknowledges its launch. Through the Speaker of the House, the bill is then referred to a suitable committee which acts on it. Whatever transpires on the floor of the House is that the bill is placed on a calendar upon approval by the Speaker cum Majority Leader, debated on, and ultimately voted on. If both houses, the Senate and the House, approve it, the bill is passed onto the President who may assent to it to become a law. The contrary happens when the duo disapproves a bill. In case a bill gets approval by one house, the bill is passed on to a Conference Committee, an amalgam of members from both houses, which works out their differences to reach a compromise. It is from this point that the bill is passed on for presidential assent, but this should be within ten days. Nevertheless, the President may decide “to veto the bill; however, this may become a law upon approval by two-thirds majority member” (Martins, 1983). The process steps involved in transforming a bill into a law in the House can be summarized as follows. First, the bill is drafted then launched in the House. This is then sent to the Committee who executes a Committee Action. If the action is positive, the bill qualifies for debate and hence goes to the Rules Committee to determine the rules for debate. The bill is then debated on the floor of the House in what we refer to as a Floor Action. A majority approval gives a green-light for the bill to proceed to the Senate. As for the Senate, the procedure is the same; however, the Rules Committee in the House is substituted with a Bill Call Up in the Senate. The ensuing procedure is what has been explained in the preceding paragraph when the houses approve or disapprove a bill. The difference in process step pitting the Senate and the House is that, while the entire Senate decides on whether to consider a bill, in the later house, this is decided on by the Rules Committee. The members of the Senate and the House of representatives are less likely to be responsive to public opinions since they hold the committee’s business at the greatest stake. For a law to effectively be implemented, the president and the bureaucrats ought to work in tandem. While the Congress makes laws, it is the duties of the bureaucrats that the law can, effectively, be enforced. As such, the bureaucrats make the rules which ought to equally be obeyed by the public. It is the president’s duty to lobby and convince the bureaucrats to implement these laws. Of note, the judiciary determines the constitutionality of a law. The main proposals of the Virginia Plan were that a national government be formed which would be composed of the judiciary, the executive, and the legislative. Moreover, the pioneers proposed for “the formation of two houses, the lower house, elected by the citizens, and the second chamber, elected by the lower house” (Martins, 1983). Furthermore, the plan proposed that the Congress would choose the executive. On the other hand, the main detail of the New Jersey Plan was that each State receives an equivalent representation in the Assembly. Against this