Introduction The notion of counseling has always encompassed a variety of techniques and methods to address the mental aspects of one’s personality in order to define the ways to provide patients with relevant interventions and therapy sessions. Thus, when it comes to the development of a treatment plan, one’s personality assessment plays one of the central roles in terms of the process. Scholars claim personality assessment to stand for a set of various tasks and questions aimed at revealing some of the major personality qualities that might contribute to the process of counseling (Whiston, 2017). Hence, the following assessments are then divided into two major categories concerning objective and subjective tests. The first category of assessment techniques is the paradigm of objective tests conducted by the counselor. The primary goal of the following tests is to define the level of the patient’s self-awareness and self-perception levels by providing them with the opportunity to go through a list of questions considering their personal qualities without any external influence (Whiston, 2017). One of the most vivid examples of such a technique is a test that consists of a set of statements related to one’s personality, whereas the examinee is to define to which extent the following statements apply to his or her personality. In such a way, the counselor has a beneficial opportunity to see how the person’s self-evaluation in the context of the present issues. Projective tests, on the contrary, are conducted by specialists in order to guide the examinees through the process with questions that help identify the features of one’s personality that are invisible to the patient (Whiston, 2017). As a result, by applying both techniques, counselors are able to identify the roots of one’s issues and obtain a better perspective on the treatment intervention. Counselor Advocacy for Crisis Intervention Plans Frequently, it is quite complicated to regard the activity of counselors in the context of community, as there exists a widespread belief that they are primarily focused on cooperation with individual patients. However, the counselors’ interaction in the community and public well-being may be regarded from two major perspectives. On the one hand, counselors contribute to the well-being of the community by interacting with individuals who might potentially impose a threat to the social environment. Another, more significant, community-related endeavor is the process of crisis intervention conducted by counselors in order to manage residents influenced by a certain event (James & Gilliland, 2017). These incidents frequently include natural or social disasters that cause major stress on the population, making their further behavioral patterns quite unpredictable and difficult to manage. In the following setting, counselors play the role of the crisis handlers who cooperate directly with the vulnerable population units. When it comes to emergency situation management, some of the major counselors’ responsibilities include assessing the environment and conducting preliminary sessions with people affected by the crisis (James & Gilliland, 2017). For example, when talking about a natural disaster like an earthquake, counselors are to