Introduction Studies show that the effectiveness of any organization is determined by the way the organization is structured and the way employees in the organization relate with each other in the workplace, how they cooperate with the management of the organization and the community as a whole. Certainly, the level of their dedication to their organization depends on the management style of the organization. In the current modern world, industrialization, and technological advancement have created a highly competitive global business environment that calls for close working relations from different experts who come from diverse cultural backgrounds. To Lodge (1995) management styles of an organization will highly depend on the size of the organization and the culture of the organization which is highly dependant on the country’s culture. Management style in India The fast economic development of India in the recent past is among significant events in world history. This economic development continues even currently and there is the very reason to believe that it will continue. At the base of India’s development is its business management style. Entrepreneurs and managers do they have the same management styles as those in America? Of course, there are some significant differences, probably these differences can to attributed to the different cultures between the two countries or can be due to the different stages in which the corporate are at. In India, many organizations are family businesses and the management stresses authoritarian kind or management style. General the relationship between the management and employees does not foster a democratic management style. Therefore the main management style in India is authoritarian. (Lodge, 1995). Authoritarian (Autocratic) This is also called a formal type of management. In this type of management, the manager simply orders employees how he or she wants the work done and what he wants employees to do without getting their views. This management style is effective when the manager has all the information that is important or necessary to solve the problem. The authoritarian style of management is not all about threatening employees or using abusive power. It does not also involve the use of demeaning language. When this is done, it can be termed as bossing around. A manager’s repertoire need not include this. (Thomson and Rampton, 2003). In autocratic management, there is a high level of supervision. It follows policies very strictly and is characterized by authority motivation. There is instilling fear in employees when this type of leadership is used. This also creates a culture of dependency on the leader. According to research, when this leadership style is used, there is very low efficiency. However, there are various instances when autocratic leadership can be used in an organization. For example, it can be used on an employee who is new in an organization and is still learning more about the job. (Thomson and Rampton, 2003). This management style dominates; the results are normally not the best. When the management style has command and control, it always drains off the employees’ ambition. They s