As a matter of fact, ethical issues take place almost in every sphere of human activity, and sporting events are not the exception. It is worth noting that competition is in human nature, and thus, fans support one team, depending on preferences or place of living, and do not like another. The majority of people do not aim to investigate or know about a personal life of a player, however, are interested in his professional skills and the way he is behaving on the field. Nevertheless, it should be noted that in some cases, personal issues could become a reason for termination of the contract or ignorance. Aroldis Chapman became a victim of his own behavior and faced accusations related to domestic violence. It had negative implications for his sporting career. The primary purpose of the paper is to discuss ethical issues associated with this problem. Aroldis Chapman’s Case Aroldis Chapman is a professional baseball player from Cuba, who holds the record for the fastest pitch in American Major League Baseball. In 2010, he signed a contract with the Reds (Coleman, 2015). Although the Reds aimed to trade him, it should be stressed that the deal with the Dodgers failed to succeed because Aroldis Chapman faced accusations related to domestic violence. Finally, the Reds traded him to the Yankees. However, the main problem was that there were no charges against Aroldis Chapman regarding domestic violence, but Major League Baseball suspended the player for 30 games. He was the first player to be suspended for 30 games based on domestic violence policy. Ethical Decision In order to get a better understanding of the issue, ethical side of the problem should be taken into consideration. There are two forms of convictions, namely governmental and public. The governmental conviction is an official and legal mechanism that aims to punish a violation of laws. It corresponds to laws that the government creates. The primary task of the conviction of this type is to secure society from socially dangerous elements and contribute to the establishment of stability. Moreover, people, who are potentially dangerous, should be taken under control, for example, isolated until the time the individual will be changed. However, the governmental conviction is not always acceptable because in order to implement it certain formal conditions should be followed. In order to involve governmental bodies, professionals should examine claims and proofs. Thus, public conviction plays a key role in some cases when the governmental involvement is not needed. Public conviction does not follow formal conditions; however, when society judges a person, an individual feels a significant pressure and experiences rejection of people. Public outlines and makes an accent on certain actions that had led to these consequences. Public conviction plays a fundamental preventive function. The modern society is sure that the fact of breaking a law and punishment from the governmental side creates a marginal person. The goal of the corrective process is not accomplished, the imprisonment commonly contributes to worsening of the situation, and a criminal is likely to follow the same behavior after the jail. Society can judge a person