Introduction The philosophy developed by Friedrich Nietzsche is referred to as Nietzscheanism and it politically and intellectually influenced every part of the world during the beginning of the 20th century. Nietzsche mostly believed in and utilized topics like social criticism, psychology, religion, ontology, epistemology and morality. Although he directly did not exhibit his philosophy, it is quite evident from his common view of our world which can be estimated through his works, particularly The Genealogy of Morals . Here he incorporates his idea of government where he indicates that government or State is a prison for human being and here human being is “encaged as he was in “the State,” as part of his taming process”. (Nietzsche, 2004, 51) It should be noted that governance of today has come a long way from the thought parameters of Nietzsche. Nietzsche’s State The perception of man, from Nietzsche’s point of view is more animal like rather than humane. He feels, “ Man has for too long regarded his natural proclivities with an “evil eye,” so that eventually they have become in his system affiliated to a bad conscience ”. (Nietzsche, 2004, 53) Thus, it is no wonder that government according to him would be a torture rather than bliss or an act of negotiation among the members of the society. He proclaims, “ the fitting of a hitherto unchecked and amorphous population into a fixed form, starting as it had done in an act of violence, could only be accomplished by acts of violence and nothing else ”. (Nietzsche, 2004, 47) This form of State or government is completely unacceptable in this day of democratic welfare system. Government of today The major aspect of modern democratic government or any fair government is its social codes. This is the frame work or platform that helps the individual to build up their respective social standpoint and humane qualities. It is expected from every members of the state to show commitment towards these codes with the conduct of a professional particularly in the field of democratic governance. This is the fundamental issue for any machinery to perform properly with a social perception. These codes can be viewed as a formulation of personal responsibility where the most identifiable significance being the mode of commitment that an individual possesses. In general sense the code possesses all aspects of professional situation both as a human and a proficient member of the state. It is obvious that a social structure of a government is formed with human aspects and for a state to become humane it is important the human aspects are indulged into following the code. It is imperative that these codes of social liberal democracy would be subjective and open to individual interpretations but it should also be noted that in such incident these codes or phrases or word of the codes would be judged upon individual approach of humane solution. Analysis For a democratic society with its democratic form of government system it is but an obvious choice to opt for a society that is predominantly color blind. The basis norm of a democratic society is to provide its mass with a structural form that offers equality in terms of justice and social characteristic. It is an unwanted phenomenon but it is also extremely true at the same time that racism