Introduction Public administration is the study, development, and effectuation of the different subdivisions of government policies. Public administration goals involve quest for public good by improving public service that encompasses civil society. Civil servants are the key players in public administration whereby, they run all activities from data collection and analysis, through legislation to execution of government activities. Research Methods There is different research methods applied in public administration including applied and pure research. Pure research, also known as fundamental research involves carrying out research to improve knowledge on some given basic issues. Elementary, basic research is involved in rebutting existing theories. On the other hand, applied research uses established theories and available information to study a given case to establish certain purpose. Literature review sets in here whereby researchers read the available literature on a given subject to draw as many points as possible addressing the question under study. On the other hand, McNabb (2002) posits that, “Research is exploratory when you use no earlier model as a basis of your study” (p. 23). This research method is useful where there is earlier research on the subject under study. Hawthorne effect is also a research methodology whereby “subjects improve an aspect of their behavior being experimentally measured simply in response to the fact that they are being studied, not in response to any particular experimental manipulation” (McNabb, 2002, p. 26). Finally, research methodologies apply both dependent and independent variables. Independent variables are present at the start of study whilst dependent variables result from the study process and they depend on the independent ones. Public Policy Analysis Public policy analysis is “determining which of various alternative policies will most achieve a given set of goals in light of the relations between the policies and the goals” (Knoepfel, Larrue & Varone, 2007, p. 4). Policy makers have to write a scenario whereby they postulate futuristic occurrences in future and plan for them now. After coming up with a futuristic scenario, policy makers now consider satisfying versus optimizing. Here they ‘suffice’ a situation by seeking to meet a given standards for sufficiency reasons as opposed to looking for an optimal solution in the optimization process. Satisfying ties closely to bounded rationality whereby after failing to come up with an optimal solution, policy makers they apply bonded rationality to employ their reason only after having greatly modified the available choices. Eventually, they carry out cost-benefit analysis to establish how their planned proposal will turn out if implemented. This involves adding all merits and subtracting all demerits and the difference points out whether a proposal is viable or not. A positive difference signifies a viable proposal whilst a negative balance signifies a null proposal. A well-quantified cost-benefit analysis is a clear indicator of how successful a policy would be if implemented. After this period, policy makers look for opportunities when the probabil