The chapter under analysis refers to the problem of inherent rights of First Nations to self-government of their territories. Their request for self-regulation is predetermined their authentic right as Creators who had lived on the territory of Canada long before the newcomers arrived. For the First Nations population, the concept of self-government is closely associated with self-determination, as well as the strategy for controlling their lives, recognizing their social position in society, and managing their affaires freely. The right to self-government encounters a number of challenges. To begin with, First Nations withdraw the possibility to regulating their economic and financial activities at a municipal level due to the absence of constitutional ground. Besides, the larger society is skeptical about the transparency and accountability of the aboriginal population. Therefore, the government restricts Native people’s authority on the reserved territories. As an alternative, the Liberal government has issued the official recognition of the right to self-government for the aboriginal people to govern the territory without constitutional intrusion. A number of other arrangements related to the case have been concluded to consider the problem. However, the issues of self-government and inherent rights of the First Nations are still on the current agenda due to moral, ethical, and political challenges. Debates on inherent rights of a First Nation people relate to the concept of inborn rights of aboriginals to sovereignty and independence from the newcomers’ government. The problem is that the Canadian government does not have appropriate legislature protecting the authority of Fist Nation self-government. Incompatibility of aboriginal rights with Constitution contradictions the overall concept of human rights to freedom and equality. This is of particular concern to the inherent right of aboriginal population to self-govern their territories. Apart from legal constraints, the case touches on a number of moral and ethical challenges. In particular, the reluctance of the Canadian population to accept the authority of aboriginal population premises on the impossibility to realize their identity and connection to their land. In order to approve these actions, the Court approaches these dilemmas in different ways. One of the approaches focuses on free-standing Aboriginal rights, which requires the First Nation people to submit irrefutable proof of their right to govern, which had previously been withdrawn. Connecting rights with treaties is another approach to tackling the point. Under these conditions, there should be historic document recognizing the right of the First Nation to self-government. Finally, the residual sovereignty is another approach to treating the problem, which implies that the Aboriginal rights could be reduced as a result of the colonization process and conquering of lands by the European invaders. The idea of self-government is also highlighted in the chapter. In this part, the author focuses primarily on the definition and significance of self-regulation for the First Nations. In particular, unlike the generally accepted definition, aboriginal population do not expect the Canadian Constitution to adopt the corresponding law that would respect their rights. Rather, self-government searches for greater possibility for self-determination and development, which is the right of all citizens living in Canada. Suppression and inequality in decision-making and regulation, therefore, is the major constrain that should be surpassed. Assessment With re