The article about Dr. Oz presents various set of concepts, ideas, and perspectives for what entails legitimate contributions to a given research field. A paradigm is a view or pattern of how things are expected to work as accepted by an individual or society. This paper seeks to identify three items from Dr. Oz’s article and explore the importance of the concepts of a paradigm to the items. First is the knowledge about a supplement, which is referred to as green coffee extract. According to the article, this supplement serves as a solution to weight loss for many people. This knowledge is based on a study that was critiqued and perceived as useless and later retracted on claims that it was not scientifically proven. Dr. Oz is trying to find a solution for weight loss. Why should individuals eat certain diets, but not others when they need to lose weight? To Dr. Oz, taking green coffee is a paradigm and through his research, he tries to show what might happen to people who subscribe to his paradigm. To others, who retracted the use of green coffee, viewed this knowledge as the inappropriate paradigm. Even though this knowledge is partly proven, some quarters in the medicine field like the British Medical Journal experts are not willing to let Dr. Oz intrude a field that they control. Largely, they imply that any new knowledge should be subject to their approval and their interests catered in the process. Dr. Oz finds this bureaucracy unnecessary and derailing to any kind of progress in promoting human welfare. The second issue is exercising, eating fruits, and sleeping right, which are natural approaches to a healthy life. Essentially, Dr. Oz seeks to sensitize people about a paradigm he thinks can be highly beneficial to their health after which research indicated it was worth in terms of weight loss. However, despite giving the message to many people, who were unaware of the health dangers of obesity, this information was highly questioned by those who want to prescribe medications for personal gain. However, diversity of opinions leads to new knowledge. Today’s disputed experiments have the potential to transform the future’s standard models in medicine. The third aspect is the individuals’ freedom to express own ideas and thoughts towards developing more knowledge in the treatment realm. Dr. Oz’s way of creating change and expressing ideas is different from the conventional bureaucratic manner that most of his critics want him to follow in a bid to ensure that his ideas are kept to himself. The bureaucratic system is a barrier to freedom of expression and without freely expressing thoughts, there would be no paradigm shift in the health sector. What is real or genuine? When do people recognize that something is genuine? Dr. Oz shows that these elements can be determined through testing and experiments. The people’s perception and thoughts enable them to plan for the future by making decisions as to which information is dealt with, and which is ignored. These decisions results in new knowledge and in most cases, they are influenced by various factors that may be complex for anyone to prove as reliable. Individuals cannot be aware of everything, but their percep