Introduction Attention getter Stories of land grabbing have existed since colonial times. In this context, land grabbing practices have evolved with time, as greed for wealth seems to take a toll on individuals, corporations, and countries. Interestingly, land grabbing has evolved from being illegal to the legal acquisition of property (Toulmin, 2009). The current practices that have seen developed countries broker deals to acquire land in developing economies are bizarre. On the other hand, the acquisition of land in Africa has resulted in great developments (Cotula, 2009). Israel has been condemned for its illegal settling at the Gaza Strip (Quigley, 1998). Explanation According to studies conducted by the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), investors from China, U.K, and the U.S poorly compensate landowners in foreign farmlands (Corriveau-Bourque, Nelson, Pritchard, Stanfield & Unruh, 2013). Therefore, this acquisition is equivalent to land grabbing due to the large parcels of land bought at cheap rates. Reveal topic Legal and illegal acquisition of foreign farmlands should be regulated and stopped since it amounts to land grabbing. Justification Land grabbing is an unethical practice that negatively affects the immediate population. It is not surprising to note that land grabbing in developing countries has been attributed to a world food crisis. Foreign investors rarely show concern of the local population since they want to make profits. Privatization of land among developing countries is to blame for the consequences of land grabbing by foreign investors. From this context, developing countries and respective governments do not establish a reasonable compensation policy once a foreigner acquires land. Land and resource governance has been a global challenge, and this is contributed by lack of transparency in terms of how land acquisition affects economic, social, and environmental aspects. Thesis This paper discusses the problems and solutions of land grabbing in developing countries by foreign investors. Body Problem review Using land for agro-investment and lack of proper natural resource governance is problematic. Level one: Using natural resources as an excuse for agro-investment has led to irresponsible land acquisition practices. In this regard, the acquisition is equivalent to land grabbing due to lack of transparency, accountability, and regulations on how land is used. According to Oxfam, several communities have complained to the World Bank on how their rights to land have been violated by foreign investors. Example of this complaint is a community in Ethiopia that has complained of large-scale agricultural lands that do not benefit the local population (Rahmato, 2011). Review level one, preview level two: The negative environmental and social implications associated with land grabbing are horrendous. Lack of proper land and resource governance, as well as regulations, promote irresponsible utilization of the same. Level two: Unlike local communities that conserve land, foreign investors use large quantities of natural resources with disregard to the environment and social impacts. The International Land Coalition has noted how large-scale farming by foreign inv