Introduction Marriage is normally related with the onset of adult outcomes, implying that there is an association between marriage and crime. This is due to the fact that marriage is usually associated with individual well being. This theoretical approach has been a subject of contention concerning the causal conclusions of the subject matter. The basic argument is that transition to adulthood normally has an effect of reducing deviance, which may ultimately result to a reduction of crime depending on the context of marriage (Brown, 2000). Basing on the research findings reported on the article Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effect, the paper attempts to draw a conclusion in order to determine whether marriage reduces crime and a counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Does marriage reduce crime? Various quantitative and qualitative researches have reported a strong relationship between marriage and a reduction of crime at the individual level. It is difficult to evaluate the core aspects behind marriage that makes it an inhibitor to individual involvement in criminal activities (Sampson et al, 2006). The first reason why marriage can play an integral role in reducing crime is that an adjustment in deviant behavior normally takes place as a reaction to an attachment or a social bond, which is established by marriage. This approach is based on the social control theory, whereby the social bond associated with marriage is vital due to the fact that it helps in the establishment of mutual support and the creation of interdependent systems, and a restraint that can be used to convert criminal propensities into positive action. A second reason as to why marriage can be used to reduce crime is because it results to key adjustments inn the daily routines and personal relationships with others. It is arguably evident that variations in daily event routines and trends of association with other people are a major contributor to individual involvement in crime. With this respect, marriage helps in the elimination of unstructured social associations and activities; therefore reducing the frequency of contact with peer groups involved in deviant behavior (Antonovics & Town, 2004). This is due to the fact that marriage comes with a lot of obligations that help to decrease involvement in other unimportant activities outside the family. The basic argument is that marriage results to a reduced social time that a person spends with friends and deviant peer groups. Changes in daily routines can be attributed ton parenting responsibilities because marriage shifts the attention to family-centered chores compared to unaccounted time with social peers. The third argument why marriage can help in reducing crime is because of the gendered resistance. This results to a direct social control that is put forth by the spouse, especially the female spouse. Gendered desistance plays an integral role in reducing the social time and offering the social support for their partners. A typical example of this is that wives are playing a vital role in the control and management of various domestic activities, which implies that they serve as the custodians of social lives of the spouses. Married couples usually have an effect on the behavior of their spouses, in the sense that it provides a framework through which couples can exercise social control through supervision (Sampson et al, 2006). The fourth reason why marriage reduces crime is that it results to identities that are likely to impose an alteration of t