14-00000-
104-10145-10436
2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992
2. ABRIBLSON
INTERNAL
APPROVED FOR RELEASE
CIA HISTORICAL REVIEW PROGRAM
эроз
3. SDB Chromol
ADMINISTRATIV UST, ONLY
16 November 1978.
MEMO FOR FILE
SUBJECT
Pennent. Bagley
1. Yesterday at about noon Mr. Bagley's attorney phoned.
OGC asking for the following:
a. The original copy of a memo said to be in Bagley's
handwriting, concerning options for Nosenko's disposal.
This was in the Hart testimony at line 4218 and the Holms
testimony at line 4610.
-
_ b. The original ane excized portion of a Bagkey nën
referring to the purposes of a polygraph of Nosenko. This
was at line 2981 of the Hart testimony and 2068 of the Helms
testimony.
c. The original letter from Bagley re "devastating conse-
quences," in the Hart testimony atlline 3877. -
d. Bagley's complete personnel file, including specifically:
(1) reference to Bagley's transfer from Headquarters in
the 1966/67 period.
(2) Fitness Reports and comments for the 1962-72 period.
(3) Promotion recommendations for 1962-72 pėriod.
(4) His IMM and the associated citation.
-
2. We asked the various parties to gather the items requested
to See what was involved. The OPF was at Headquarters, having been
bgought from WTC for the HSCA inquiry. The Honor and Merits Awards
Board had the modal and citation (having been brought up for a file_
réciów). CI Staff had thr documents cited in the Hart t-simpny. We
met yesterday afternoon to consider what is involved. Bagley wanted
the material an appearance at HSCA this morning.
22422.
ADMINISTRATOVE,
-
INTERNAL UST, ONLY
14-00000
VPJ
1 ADMINISTRATIVE
-
INTERNAL. USE LI
مستر
3°
CCS has a standing position on non-release of citations
24,35
and awards to persons retired under cover ((Bagley is retired in
cover))
Bolgium under State cover
so he would have to make a decision on
-
that before he could have the material. He could not be given some
of his personnel records, as they are clsssified, although he could be
shown them as in a Privacy Act request; he is not now cleared for
access to classified material, although his attorney is. CI Staff
considers the materials not cited in the Hart testimony as unclassified;
those portions authorized for use are unclassified only to the extent
used by Hart; the exception is the entire handwritten list of options,
which has been provided the Committee at its request, and he can see that
when he appears before the Committee.
4. I tried to contact the DDA and DDO, reaching John McMahon.
He agrees with this preliminary position. Mike Malanik phoned me back, today,
indicating that when the cover aspect is straightened out Bagley should
be treated as anyone else. Dick Rininger of OGC, meanwhile, had advised
Mr. Chabot, Bagley's attorney, that the cover consideration has to be
resolved first. Bagley was there and Rininger also spoke to him, with
Bagley indicating his intention to have his cover removed.
SDBreckinridge
ADMINISTRATIVE -
-
INTERNAL USE ONLY