200000
104-10333-10006
ו
2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992
J2
CLASSIFIED FAX
TRANSMISSION
ARRB
202-724-0088
To:
Barry Harrelson
Date:
March 31, 1997
Fax #:
703-613-3060
Pages:
17, including this cover sheet.
From:
Michelle Combs
Subject:
DS&T and DO Briefing Questions
COMMENTS:
Bany,
Attached are the final versions of the DS&T and DO briefing questions. There are no changes in
the DS&T questions. Questions have been added to the DO list to reflect our conversation
March 19 and 20. You, of course, already have our detailed explanations for the earlier DO
questions. If you have any questions or if there are any problems, please give me a call. I should
be in all day. See you tomorrow.
Michelle
13-00000
>
MAR 31 '97 12:05PM
Y
Questions for Follow-up DO Records Briefing
April 1, 1997
P.4
1. At what point did the DDP begin to keep records of destroyed records? For
example, in a Cold Warrior footnote, Tom Mangold reports that as any of Angleton's
files were destroyed, "a complete record was carefully maintained about what had been
done. (George) Kalaris signed off on every file and the DCI's office was notified."
(p. 143) Where are these records?
2. Could an archival search be run on specific topics for retired records at the CIA's
Record's Center? Perhaps an ARRB staffer could be present during the search to review
the abstracts and to suggest other fields or topics to be searched?
3. Could a crypt search for records containing relevant crypts be run through
cryptographic reference? How would queries need to be framed and stated?
4. Why is it so difficult to develop a list for all personnel (official, contract,
administrative, or TDY) assigned to the post referenced in RIF 104-10065-10199 from
1959-1964?
5. We have been working to identify all technical and surveillance operations in and on
the Cuban and Soviet consulates and embassies in Mexico City between September 1
and December 1, 1963. How can we frame a search query to determine if we have a
comprehensive and complete list of all operations at that time?
6. How can a search query be framed to document all electronic take produced by the
Mexico City Station in the immediate wake of the assassination (the first month) and
during the period of Oswald's visit? How can we verify that what exists in the
Sequestered Collection represents all records of the technical production that was
available at the time of the assassination? If additional records or original production
still exists, where would it be stored or filed? What searches could be conducted to
retrieve any additional records? If such electronic take has been destroyed, do records
exist of the destruction?
7. Could you describe the process by which operational funds are proposed, approved,
received, and distributed (circa 1963). What funding and disbursement records exist?
How are they organized? How should a request be formulated to institute a reasonable
search of these records?
1
13-00000
MAR 31 '97 12:05PM
P.5
8. We have seen DDP monthly operational reports which contain information on the
allocation/distribution of operational funds. Are there other DDP records which would
reflect how certain projects utilized their funding? How are these records organized?
How should a search query be framed?
9. Various open sources have linked the CIA to various journalists and publishing
companies during the 1960's. How should a query be framed to search for connections
between the Agency and journalists or publishing companies?
10. Did the Agency have any relationship, projects, or contacts with publishing houses
during the time of the assassination and in the aftermath of the Warren Commission?
How would a search be formulated to determine whether or not the Agency had a
relationship with any of the same publishing houses that were also publishing books
about the assassination?
11. How would a query be framed to search for files on any office or person dealing
with organized crime and Cuba? How should a request be formulated to institute a
reasonable search on this topic?
12. Is there a comprehensive record or list detailing the identities of individuals on the
Interagency Source Register? How are these records organized? How can a search
query be framed to ascertain whether or not a particular individual appears in the
Register,>
13. How could a search query be framed to ascertain whether or not a particular
individual was given access to classified information by DCD (then OO)? What kind of
files are assembled in the process of clearing non-Agency contacts/sources for access to
classified information?
14. ARRB's Request for Additional Information and Record No. CIA-13, dated
November 1, 1996, contained the following questions:
A.
B.
What forms of backchannel communications were there between the
Mexico City Station (including the COS), JMWAVE, or Headquarters
during 1963? By "backchannel" we mean, inter alia, any administrative,
senior staff, or restricted access communications, or any written or
electronic communications other than regular cables or dispatches (of the
type included in the JFK Collection).
Were there, in fact, any backchannel communications between the Mexico
City Station (including the COS), JMWAVE, or Headquarters during the
time periods 27 Sept - 16 Oct 1963 and 22 Nov - 30 Nov 1963?
2
13-00000
MAR 31 '97 12:06PM
P.6
C.
To the extent that there were any backchannel communications for the
time periods 27 Sept - 16 Oct 1963 and 22 Nov - 30 Nov 1963 (other than
those currently contained in the JFK Collection), please make such records
available for review.
Why has it been so difficult to answer these questions?
15. ARRB's Request for Additional Information and Record No. CIA-14, dated
December 23, 1996, documented our request for the annual or biannual Station reports
for Mexico City Station for 1963 and 1964. Why has it been so difficult to provide these
reports?
16. The attached Agency document released in 1996 contains the paragraph:
11. A memorandum marked only for file, 16 March 1967, signed M.D.
Stevens, says that J. Monroe SULLIVAN, #280207, was granted a covert
security approval on 10 December 1962 so that he could be used in Project
QKENCHANT. (Clay) Shaw has # 402897-A.
What do these numbers mean? What does the "A" at the ends of Shaw's number
signify? Do the files identified by these numbers still exist? Why was Sullivan granted
a covert security approval?
17. During the period 1959-1963, what was the purpose or goal of QKENCHANT?
18. Under what circumstances were non-agency employees given covert security
clearances for the QKENCHANT project?
19. Did Clay Shaw receive a covert security approval for the QKENCHANT project?
Why was one needed? Did Clay Shaw receive covert security clearances for any
project other than QKENCHANT
20. What did Clay Shaw do within the QKENCHANT project?
21. Do records exist to account for the disposition of all files on Clay Shaw?
22. Did Howard Hunt have any involvement with the QKENCHANT project prior to
1964?
23. Did J. Monroe Sullivan have any involvement with the QKENCHANT project prior
to 1964?
3
13-00000
MAR 31 '97 12:06PM
P.7
SECRET
SECRET
24. The DO telephone directories list an Operational Services/Defector Staff beginning
in October 1959? What was the Defector Staff? Did it have an operational component?
25. In the period 1959-1964, were DO officers, selected to serve overseas under State
Department cover, legally considered to be members of the Foreign Service, appointed
by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate?"
SECRET
SECRET
13-00000
پیر
MAR 31 197 12:07PM
•
HELĦABRD, PER F.L. 102-626 (JFK AUT)
NARA S
DATE 214147
P.8
.a
velation clean, easy to was specimen of what we slecatly fieve
CIA HISTORICAL REVIEW PROGRAM
Release As Sanitized
1998
"CIA calls a
Note: only redaction is OK (what
Digraph) from QK BLUCHANG
on page 4 here peragraph #11:
Enclosure 21
I've included
a poor copy
of page 4 that contains the Ok!!
SUBJECT: Clay L.YSHAW (201-813493).
L✗SHAW
1. Subject was born on 17 March 1913 in New Orleans,
Louisiana.
.
2. Standard background information on Subject
(parents, marital status, records of education and
employment, etc.) is lacking because SRAW was a contact
of the Domestic Contact Service.
3. Traces on Subject have been run in RID/Main
Index, the index of the Office of Security and the
Central Cover Staff. The first showed only a 1951 FBI
interview with SHAW about a former employee of the New.
Orleans International Trade Mart. The second showed
that 00/Contacts Division had requested a name trace ;
about 1949 and that the check of FBI records then aon-
ducted was negative. Central Cover Staff had no record.
4. Some of the 00-B reports based on SHAW's
reporting are on hand. They are the following. (It
is noted that the source description identifies the
'source by job title.)
12.
00-B 47958, 26 March 1952, concerns
The
a letter written to the public relations
director of the International Trade
Mart by one Dr. Jutta SCHALLER, a trade.
consultant to the Ronn Government.
letter is a follow-up of discussions held
in New Orleans during December 1951.
letter said that Soviet production and
export trade were being advertised and
CARDED
The
1930-492-8
Document Number -492-Y
for FOIA Review on"
DEC 1977
"
+
13-00000
MAR 31 197 12:07PM &
RELEASED, PER P.L. 102-826 (JFK ACT)
MARA Sk
DATE 2/4147
☐
84844H
OLDACT
P.9
bi
◉.
a.
e.
f.
.
promoted by West German money. The
publication Wer Liefert Was?, published
in Leipzig, is now also being published
in Hamburg, at a price much lower than
competitive volumes.
Information
00-B-9381, 27 December 1948.
acquired 18 December 1948. SHAW (identified
by job title) has agreed to lease to the
CSR government 1,000. fent of space for a
display of merchandise in New Orleans.
lease is for one year, starting 1 April
1949.
The
00-8-4933-49, 14 Juna 1949, information
date late April and early May 1949. Results
of a trip SHAW made in March through. May
1949 in West Indies, Central America, and
Northern South America.
00-0-4934-49, 14 June 1949, same general
subject and background as above.
00-B-4935-49, 14 June 1949, as above.
00-B-35477, 29 June 1951. Results of a
SHAW trip in 1951 in Central and South
America and the Caribbean area.
5. On 9 May 1961 Ganeral C. P. Cabell, than DDCI,
addressed the Foreign Policy Association of New Orleans.
It is believed that he was introduced by Clay SHAW.
6. On 3 March 1967 the Washington Star reported
that Garrison had arrested SHAW and had made public
charges that SHAW, FERRIE, OSWALD, and others had plotted
the assassination in the apartment of FERRIE at 3300
Louisiana Parkway, New Orleans. SHAW has said that he
never saw OSWALD. He denies having used the name Clay
BERTRAND. Jack S. MARTIN said that FERRIE had mentioned
13-00000
یر
MAR 31 '97 12:08PM
M
HELBABRI PER P.L. 102-836 (JFK ACT)
MARA SK
DATE 214147i
•
"OLUKAI
SHAW to him. J.. Monroe SULLIVAN, executive director of
the San Francisco World Trade Center, told the Associated
Press that SHAW was in San Francisco and touring the
Canter with him on the day of the assassination. SHAW,
now retired, was formerly the managing director of the
International Trade Mart in New Orleans. He is 54 years
old. Ramsey Clark, U.S. Attorney General, said that the
FBI had investigated SHAW late in 1963. "On the evidence
that the FBI has, there was no connection found" with the
assassination.
7. Memorandum No. 84-67, 3 March 1967, from Chief,
New Orleans Office, to Director, Domestic Contact Service,
re SKAW.
a.
The
SHAW
The first contact of the New Orleans office
of the DCS with Clay SHAW occurred in
December 1948. A name check request was
returned "no info" on 23 March 1949.
was contacted by Mr. Hunter Leake of the
New Orleans office seven times in 1949,
twice in 1950, five times in 1951, nina
times in 1952, once in 1953, twice in 1954,
twice in 1955, and twice in 1956. SHAW
is the source of eight 00-B reports sub-
mitted by the New Orleans office, At one
time he had the "Y" number 145.1.
last contact took place on 25 May 1956
On 23 January 1967 Jack S. MARTIN phoned
the New Orleans office, said that he was
working on an important undercover deal
for. Garrison and Detective Louis IVON,
and was calling at IVON's request.
culling to ask the head of the CIA office
to telephone IVON on his unlisted number.
No such call was made. The writer, Lloyd
A. Ray, asks that the General Counsel be
informed and that he provide advice.
He was
8. Undated and unsigned memorandum (probably
produced by CI/R & A). The following additional infor-
mation was provided by the New Orleans office of DCS.
3
a-
P.10
13-00000
MAR 31 '97 12:08PM
P.11
✓ REPRODUCE
ODUCED AT THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES
-
"
since 25 May 1936 r.d seon SHAW casually,
by chance, in various downtown New Orleans restaurants,
and greetings. ware' exchanged. • The last such casual
encounter was just before SHAW's ratizemont in 1965.
9. On 7 March 1967 Pravda published en aztiolo
called "Clay Shaw of the CIA datalined Rome, 6 Merch
1967, written by V: YERMAKOV, The article charged that. •
CIA made use of the services of Clay SHAW for CIA'S OWN
inturants in Italy. The Prhuda piase notes that the DA
in Now Origana is accusing SHAW of participation in the.
cassination conspiracy. It says SKAN spont "nome yours"
in Poma an à World Trade Conter loader. It claims that
the Cantar was a cover for financing anti-Communist activity.
CIA gava directives to SHAN. The World Trade Center was
a branch of "Painiden" (sic), "which the novopapers in
Switzerland openly becused of 'criminal oporatione',
(Comment: It appears that all of the Pravda charges are
untame, except that there was a CIA-SULAW Falationship. So
farat in known; SHAW was never asked to use his relation-
chip with tha: World Trade Center for clandestina purposes
and, in fact, hd has not been in Italy.)
"
10. Hamorandum from me to // GAE Merch
1967 subject: Italian Apts of the clay thaw Alfate,
Phó Cogzlags dállá Saga of 5. March 1567 has an articlo
shout SHAW, the assosiation, and the, World Trade Contor:
Contains no rolovant information..
11. manorandum marked only for file, 16 March 1967,
Digned toyons, says, that J. Monzon SULLIVAN, $280207,
was granted a covart security approval on 10 Decomber, 1962
so that he could be used in Project ONEMCHANT. SHAW has
0402097-18
12. (Momorandum from 24 March
1967 Subject: Trace Results on, Persons Connected with
"Centra Kondiala Commerciala" (World Trade Center), filed
folder, Clay SHAW - working papazo,
.
13-00000
MAR 31 197 12:09PM,
HELBASED PER P.L. 102-520 (JFK ACT)
MARA Sk
_DATH 2/4/47
"OLUTIES
P.12
Same page.
better copy.
QK redacted
since 25 May 1956 Mr. Hunter Leake had seen SHAW casually,
by chance, in various downtown New Orleans restaurants,
and greetings were exchanged. The last such casual
encounter was just befoza SHAW's retirement in 1965.
9. On 7 March 1967 Pravda published an artiola
called "Clay Shaw of the CIA datalined Rome, 6 March
1967, written by V. YERMAKOV. The article charged that.
CIA made use of the services of Clay SHAW for CIA's own
interests in Italy. The Pravda place notes that the DA
in New Orleans is accusing SHAW. of participation in the
assassination conspiracy. It says SHAW spent "some years"
in Rome as a World Trade Canter leader. It claims that
the Center was a cover for financing anti-Communist activity.
CIA gave directives to SHAW. The World Trade Canter was
a branch of "Permidax" (sic), "which the newspapers in
Switserland openly accused of 'criminal operations'....
(Comment: It appears that all of the Pravda charges ara
untrue, except that there was a CIA-SHAW relationship.
far as is known, SHAW was naver asked to use his relation-
ship with the World Trade Center for clandestine purposes
and, in fact, he has not been in Italy.)
So
10.
Memorandum from C/EUR/I to C/CI/R & A, 8 March
1967 subject:. Italian Aspects of the Clay Shaw Affair.
The Corriere della Sera of 5 March 1967 has an article
about SILAW, the assassination, and the World Trade Center.
Contains no relevant information.
11. A memorandum marked only for file, 16 March 1967,
signed M.D. Stevens, days that J. Monroe SULLIVAN, #280207,
was granted. a covert security approval. on 10' December 1962
so that he could be used in Project (JENCHANT. SHAW has
#402897-A.
12. Mamorandum from C/EUR/I to C/CI/R & A, 24 March
1967, Subjects "Trace Results on Persons Connected with
Centro Mondiale Commerciala" (World Trade Center), filed
CI/RL A folder, Clay'SHAW working papers.
-
•་

13-00000
.
MAR 31 '97
8
12:09PM
REPRODUCED AT THE NATIONAL, ARCHIVIN
HHLRABBU PER
MARA SU
102-826 (JFK ACT)
DATE 2/4/47
SPORET
The 5: March 1967 issue of Il Messaggero
links SHAW with the World Trade Center.
Others linked to the center were traced,
with results reported in this memorandum.
No relationship to the Garrison investigation
appears here. A report on "Parmidex", a
Swiss corporation with principal offices.
in Rome, is also in the file because the
World Trade Center and Permidex are
associated.
Again, there is no information
here which relates significantly to the
case Garrison is trying to build in New
Orleans..
13.
The Washington Post, Outlook, 2 April 1967,
"Soaking Truth in New Orleans in the Middle of the
Night", George Lardner, Jr.
a. Garrison's men drove RUSSO to SHAW's
French Quarter homa, RUSSO posed as a
Mutual of Omaha salesman. He knocked at
door; SHAW answered. RUSSO said that he
was Clem BERTRAND.
b.
SILAW is a 54-year old bachelor and
socialite who pioneered the 33-story
International Trade Mart in New Orleans.
He was subpoenaed by Garrison's office
on 1 March 1967. According to his friends,
his questioners did not advise him of his
rights. They told him they had evidence
of a meeting with FERRIE and OSWALD.
There was a fuse and SIJAW was arrested
and booked on conspiracy to murder JPK.
That night Garrison's man raided SHAW's
apartment and confiscated whips, 'chains,
a black not cap, a cape and hood. RUSSO
told reporters that he did not know Clay
SHAW, but he identified the man arrested
by Garrison as Clém BERTRAND.
S
SECTER
P.13
13-00000
343
Mr. CHAYES. No; I think in each case it will depend so much on the altuation
with the particular person. If a person comes in and he is very ägitated or
something of that kind, it might dictate a totally different approach than a differ-
ent kind of thing
Mr. DULLES. Wouldn't it be useful though to give-I don't want to suggest
what the Secretary of State should do in this, but in the light of this experi-
ence, would there not be some benefit possibly in giving people in the field the
result of the experience gained in this particular case?
Mr. CHAXES. Well, the general approach, and other matters related to it,
are touched on in orientation courses for consular officers and so on. I think
as I look on Consul Snyder's actions, that he behaved very much like a respon-
sible Foreign Service officer.
That happened long before I was in the Department, so I can say that
without any involvement. But it seemed to me that he did just what he
should have done, despite the unfortunate aftermath. And it shows to me, at
least, that the training and orientation that these people are getting is right, is
serviceable, and they are able to handle these situations as they come in,`.
Mr. DULLES. I realize that you ought not to prescribe hard and fast rules,
that there is a broad range of discretion that should be exercised here. But I
Just raise the question as to whether a good deal of experience hasn't been gained
in this case in that very field.
Mr. CHAYER. Well, it may very well be that more attention to that particular
aspect should be given in the orientation courses and so on. Those things.
tend to reflect what is hot at the moment you know, and if you haven't had
trouble with something for a pretty long time, it tenda maybe not to get
mentioned..
Representative Form. If Oswald had persisted that day, October 81, in de-
manding the form that is a prerequisite under your definition for renunciation,
would Snyder have been required to give it to him and permit him to sign it?
Mr. CHAYES..I think if it had been in ordinary office hours when the com-
Brilate was open for business, and if Snyder was satisfied that he was competent,
that Oswald was competent, he would have to give him the form, yes, sir.
Representative FORD. Does Snyder. have the authority to make a determina-
tion of competency?
Testimony of Abram Chayes
Legal Advisor, Dept. of State
Warren Commis
7 Vol.5
34
Mr: CHAYES. No; he doesn't have the authority to make a determination of
competence, and I suppose it is possible at some point to get the issue tried in
court. But I think a consular officer would probably be acting within his
discretion if he saw sombody who was drunk or raving or something and just
said; "Well, I am not going to give you this until I am sure that your action is
your act. After all, when the comsul accepts the oath, he is certifying that it
is the act of the person in a meaningful sense, and so if he thought that the
person was incompetent, I think he would have discretion not to give the oath.
But I put that far aside because in the particular case bere, Mr. Snyder made it
perfectly clear that he had no reason to doubt that Oswald was fully competent.
And so if Oswald had been there at a time when the office was open, or haď
returned at a time when the office was open, and bad persisted in his demand,
I think Snyder would have been under an obligation to give him the form.
Representative Form. The only technical reason or basla upon which Snyder
could have denied Oswald the right that day was the fact that it was on a
Saturday, a non-working-hour period of the Embassy.
Mr. CHAYES. Yes; I think he had every right to try to dissuade him, or per-
suade him not to act or persuade him to think it over and come back the next
day. But if after all of that Oswald still had said "But I want to do it now"
and if the office was open for business, then I think he would have had to do it.
Mr. DULLES. I think it might be useful if it has not been done to introduce
at this point as an exhibit the form of oath of renunciation. Here is the for-
malized oath and I think it would be well to have this in our records unless
It is already in our records.
Representative Forn. I agree.
Mr. COLEMAN. No; it isn't. Could we 'say it will be marked as Commission
Exhibit No. 955 and place this sticker on that page, photostat it and then just
and it hark?
(Commission Exhibit No. 955 was marked for identification and received in
evidence)
་
Representative Fuso. When Oswald came back on November 8, I believe, which
was a regular working day
"
Mr. COLEMAN. Mr. Commissioner, he did not come back on November, &
merely wrote a letter.
Mr. CHATE. Wrote a letter. He never came back.
Representative FORD. Are all of the employees, Mr. Snyder, Mr. McVlekar
and the others who had any. firsthand contact with the Oswald case
area, were they State Department employees?..
Mr. CHAYES. Yes, sir; these two men, who, were the only ones who did
him directly, I think the secretary, their secreta saw him, but had
to do with him except as a receptionist. These two men were Foreign
ice officers and are now Foreign Berylce officers.
Representative Form. In the strictest term
Mr. CHAYKH. Yes, pir; members of the Foreign Service, appointed by
President with the advice and consent of the Senate.
Representative FuxD, Could you tell us in a bit more detail the process that
you followed or the procedure that you carried out when you first got into the
Oswald care.
.
You mentioned yesterday you got a call or you were directed by I belleve
the Secretary of State or by somebody in higher authority to take certain steps.
WNI you tell us who called you, what you did in the first 8 or 4 days?
Mr. CHATTS. It was the evening of the day, perhaps about 5 o'clock on the
day of the assassination. It may have been somewhat earlier, because I think
I remember I went home for an hour and then came back to carry out this
assignment. Mr. Ball, once it became known that Oswald had some history as
a defector
George W Ball
Alr. DuLies. Ball is the Under Secretary of Statem
D.E
Mr. CHATES. He was then the Acting Secretary, because the Secretary of State
as you recall was on a plane over the Pacific. So he was the Acting Secretary,
But even if he had been the Under Secretary he is my client.
Representative FORD. He still had some authority.
Mr. CHATES. Yes; he directed me to gather together the files in the Department
on Oswald, and to prepare a report to be available for him the first thing in the
morning covering as best we could within that time span the contacts that
Oswald had with the Department.
We got the passport file. We got the security office file. We got the special
consular services file which covered Mrs. Oswald's visa and the repatriation
loan: I think those three files were the ones that we had. It may have been
there was a smaller fourth file, but I think those three were the ones.
Representative Forn. What would that smaller fourth file be?
Mr. CHAYES, I can't remember. It was duplicates if it was anything. Oh, that
is right, we had a visa file and an 808 file so those were the four. The SCB
file, that is Special Consular Services, in the office; in the Bureau of Security
and Consular Affairs.
.
Representative Form. You got this order on or about 5 o'clock the 22d of
November?
Mr. OHAYES, The 22d; yes, sir.
Representative FORD. And you issued orders to have these files brought in,
or did you go and get them yourself?
Mr. CHAYES. No.
Bepresentative Form. Or what happened?
.
MAR
'97
12:10PM
State Dept: employ
Mr. CRAYER. I issued orders to have them brought in. I called I am trying
to think how we got them. (Turning to Mr. Ehrlich.) Did you go down and
get them? Mr. Ehrlich and Mr. Lowenfeld, another of my people, we worked
through the night on this, the three of us all together and it may be that the
two of them went down to get them. I don't think we just called over. the tele-
phone and asked them to be brought up..
.
(Discussion off the record.) ·
Mr. CHAYES. It is my recollection that one of these two gentlemen, either
Afr Wolish Th
:
13-00000
:
5/14/97
Barry
reaction in that
my re
several questions are
much too brood.e.g.,
gorife
5,6., 9, 10, 12. read to be quecife
For no. 2, we should
کی جیت کے
not agree to having
ARR B shaffer presente
for now. 7; they should
Applain the purpose of
The question.
13-00000 HR 14
10'
FAX TRANSMISSION
ARRB
To:
Fax #:
From:
Barry Harrelson
703-613-3060
Michelle Combs
Subject:
DO Briefing Questions
202-724-0088
FAX:
Date:
March 14, 1997
Pages:
3, including this cover sheet.
COMMENTS:
We may add additional questions but this should give you an idea of the topics. Have a good
weekend.
Johnny
What
your reactions
to these questions? Has
Gunn crossed the live?
Return
Ваш
13-00000
DRAFT
Types of Questions for Follow-up DO Records Briefing
March 17, 1997
1. At what point did the DDP begin to keep records of destroyed records? For
example, in a Cold Warrior footnote, Tom Mangold reports that as any of Angleton's
files were destroyed, "a complete record was carefully maintained about what had been
done. (George) Kalaris signed off on every file and the DCI's office was notified."
(p. 143) Where are these records?
2. Could an archival search be run on specific topics for retired records at the CIA's
Record's Center? Perhaps an ARRB staffer could be present during the search to review
the abstracts and to suggest other fields or topics to be searched?
3. Could a crypt search for records containing relevant crypts be run through
cryptographic reference? How would queries need to be framed and stated?
4. Why is it so difficult to develop a list for all personnel (official, contract,
administrative, or TDY) assigned to the post referenced in RIF 104-10065-10199?
5. We have been working to identify all technical and surveillance operations in and on
the Cuban
un 
and Soviet consulates and embassies in Mexico City between September 1
and December 1, 1963. How can we frame a search query to determine if we have a
comprehensive and complete list of all operations at that time?
**
6. How can a search query be framed to document all electronic take produced by the
Mexico City Station in the immediate wake of the assassination (the fist month) and
during the period of Oswald's visit? How can we verify that what exists in the
Sequestered Collection represents all records of the technical production that was
available at the time of the assassination? If additional records or original production
still exists, where would it be stored or filed? What searches could be conducted to
retrieve any additional records? If such electronic take has been destroyed, do records
exist of the destruction?
7. Could you describe the process by which operational funds are proposed, approved,
received, and distributed (circa 1963). What funding and disbursement records exist?
How are they organized? How should a request be formulated to institute a reasonable
search of these records?
DRAFT
13-00000
MAR 14 '97
10.
וחם
DRAFT
8. We have seen DDP monthly operational reports which contain information on the
allocation/distribution of operational funds. Are there other DDP records which would
reflect how certain projects utilized their funding? How are these records organized?
How should a search query be framed?
9. Various open sources have linked the CIA to various journalists and publishing
companies during the 1960's. How should a query be framed to search for connections
between the Agency and journalists or publishing companies?
10. Did the Agency have any relationship, projects, or contacts with publishing houses
during the time of the assassination and in the aftermath of the Warren Commission?
How would a search be formulated to determine whether or not the Agency had a
relationship with any of the same publishing houses that were also publishing books
about the assassination?
j
11. How would a query be framed to search for files on any office or person dealing
with organized crime and Cuba? How should a request be formulated to institute a
reasonable search on this topic?
12. Is there a comprehensive record or list detailing the identities of individuals on the
Interagency Source Register? How are these records organized? How can a search
query be framed to ascertain whether or not a particular individual appears in the
Register,
13. How could a search query be framed to ascertain whether or not a particular
individual was given access to classified information by DCD (then OO)? What kind of
files are assembled in the process of clearing non-Agency contacts/sources for access to
classified information?
DRAFT
:
13-00000
MAR 18 '97 06:52PM
TION
ASSAS
REVIE
RECORDS
BOARD
MEMORANDUM
March 18, 1997
P.2
Assassination Records Review Board
600 E Street NW 2nd Floor Washington, DC 20530
(202) 724-0088 • Fax: (202) 724–0457
•
SECRET
TO:
John Pereira and Barry Harrelson
FROM:
Jeremy Gunn
SUBJECT:
ARRB Questions Submitted for DO Briefing
I would like to address some of the concerns that you expressed at our meeting
yesterday, where we briefly discussed the Review Board's Proposed Questions for the
March 17 briefing regarding DO records. We understand that you have some concerns
about the scope of the topics raised. We very much appreciate your recognition of the
importance that we attach to the ARRB's independence and we again wish to
emphasize the fact that we fully understand your proper concern for the protection of
information that is unrelated to the Kennedy assassination.
I would like to emphasize that the questions that we sent to you were not intended as in
depth research queries, but rather as topical talking points for discussion. We prepared
the questions, at your request, in order to give the persons conducting the briefing an
understanding of the types of issues in which we were interested. They represent issues
that we wish to explore in our quest for additional information and records to facilitate
the completion of the ARRB's responsibilities under the JFK Act.
We appreciate your acknowledgment that the ARRB is not necessarily obligated to
justify to CIA the questions it deems relevant to the assassination. Nevertheless, in
order to facilitate and coordinate our efforts, we are very willing to offer the following
additional explication of those questions that we understand may have been considered
by the Agency to be excessively broad.
SECRET
BOARD MEMBERS: John R. Tunhelm, Chair Henry F. Graff Kermit L. Hall • William L. Joyce • Anna K. Nelson
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: David G. Marwell
13-00000
MAR 18 '97 06:53PM
SECRET
P.3
Question #5:
We have been working to identify all technical and surveillance operations in and on the
Cuban and Soviet consulates and embassies in Mexico City between September 1 and
December 1, 1963. How can we frame a search query to determine if we have a
comprehensive and complete list of all operations at that time?
Until very recently, we had seen no evidence that CIA had microphone surveillance of
the Cuban compound. However, Dispatch HMMW 12454 (no IDEN number attached)
found in Box 23, Folder 9 of the Sequestered Collection, makes reference to LICOOLS
(concealed microphones inside the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City). Though the
dispatch reports that the last LICOOL ceased functioning in 1961--before the period in
question-the prior existence of this capability and the fact that the dispatch discusses
the possibility of reactivation prompts the question of whether all technical and'
surveillance operations against the Cuban and Soviet Consulates have been identified
to the ARRB. In addition, the dispatch refers to MKTRAP, a telephone hot mike
operation which was re-actuated from a basehouse in November 1963. The specific hot
mike telephone PBIMPULSE appears to have been in operation during 1963. Are there
records from this operation? Are there any other operations that may have picked up
Oswald's visit?
Question # 6:
How can a search query be framed to document all electronic take produced by the
Mexico City Station in the immediate wake of the assassination (the first month) and
during the period of Oswald's visit? How can we verify that what exists in the
Sequestered Collection represents all records of technical production that were available
at the time of the assassination? If additional records or original production still exists,
where would it be stored or filed? What searches could be conducted to retrieve any
additional records? If such electronic take has been destroyed, do records exist of the
destruction?
This question is a follow up to question # 5. If MKTRAP was in operation from
September 1-December 1, 1963, where are the records or transcripts describing the take?
Was the take ever retained or reviewed? Do any original tapes or transcripts still exist?
Where might these records be found? Were any other technical operations in progress?
The various project files for the technical operations known to exist during this period
are spotty and incomplete. How can the ARRB know if it has reviewed records of all
the technical operation take for the relevant time period?
SECRET
13-00000
MAR 18 '97 06:54PM
Question # 9:
SECRET
P.5
Various open sources have linked the CIA to various journalists and publishing
companies during the 1960's. How could a query be framed to search for connections
between the Agency and journalists or publishing companies?
The two 1967 Ramparts articles mention connections between the Agency and
journalists worldwide. The primary focus of this question is on any connection between
the Agency and any journalist who might have covered the assassination domestically.
Additionally, we would be interested in any publishing company involved in
publishing books about the assassination. HSCA staff notes (RIF 180-10142-10087)
summarize several files dealing with contacts between the Agency, publishing houses,
and authors. For example, the file identified as QKOPERA/Liaison ZRBLESS outlines
a memo by Gunnar W. Beckman CA/PROP on the status of negotiations between
Praeger Publishing and Milovan Djilas. ZRBLESS is identified as a subproject of
WUBONBON. Further, the staff notes mention a project involving "Praeger and
publication" [sic], a separate project involving "the Freedom Fund and distribution"
[sic], and a third project to provide news service to the foreign press through
Continental Press. Each of these projects appears to have been in operation in 1963-64.
Question #10:
Did the Agency have any relationship, projects or contacts with publishing houses
during the time of the assassination and in the aftermath of the Warren Commission?
How would a search be formulated to determine whether or not the Agency had a
relationship with any of the same publishing houses that were also publishing books
about the assassination?
This question is a follow up to question # 9. One record that is already in the collection
(RIF 180-10142-10087) summarizes the Project File of WUPUNDIT and notes two ‘one
time only' operations in 1963--WURAISIN and WUTRANSIT which were responsible
for publishing two books each. In addition, WUSENDER is reported to be a ‘one time
only' operation responsible for three books in 1964. If these books have domestic
implications or are on subjects related to the assassination, they would be relevant
documents.
We hope that this additional explication may help you and the DO understand our
approach to the issues raised in our questions. Should any of our requests impose on
you or your staff a burden that we may not have anticipated -- or which would entail
work of dubious value or benefit -- please advise us so that we can work with you to
modify or amend the requests accordingly.
SECRET
13-00000
MAR 18 '97 06:53PM
SECRET
P.4
Please also remember that, when we request accesses to these materials, we are not
designating them "assassination records" and we are not, at this time, requesting that
copies of documents be given to the Review Board.
We appreciate your continuing cooperation and helpfulness.
Sincerely yours,
T. Jeremy Gunn
General Counsel and Associate Director
for Research and Analysis
SECRET

13-00000
-
MAR 18 '97 06:54PM -
.10
DISPATCH
_ COS Mexico City
1043
JROM
_ Chief, MU Division.
SUBJECT
Sequestered Collection Box 23, Folder - 9
CLASSIFICATION
K. A. P O'K
SECRET
• PROCESSING ACTION
MARKED FOR INDERING
NO INDERING REQUIRED
ONLY QUALIFICO DESE
CAN JUDGE INDESINS
MUCROFILM
PERUMEN LIFEAT/LIERORE. Contusion in Use of_Cryptúkymh_
¡ACTION REQUIRED - DEFERENCES*****
1. The Station's use of certain cryptonyms identifying technical
operations against PBRUMEN TPELIDE in Mexico has caused confusion in
Headquarters elements responsible for sourcing and dissemination of
information produced, and for supporting the entire complex of
Roperations itself. The cryptonyms in question are (a) LIFEAT
(b) LIERODE (c) MKTRAP (d) LICOOL/11 and (e) PBIMPULSE. The original:
meaning of these cryptonyms is being forwarded under separate cover.
2.
The purpose of this dispatch is to submit for Station comment
a review of the technical operational effort against PERUMEN TPELIDE.
#ince its inception. The objectives are (1) to complete Headquarters
records which lack considerable detail concerning the intricacies of
the operation, (2) to urge a more precise use of cryptonyms in
reporting, this activity which would benefit Headquarters personnel
responsible for monitoring and supporting those operations and (3) to
suggest a few administrative adjustments which would dispel the present
confusion mentioned in this dispatch.
3. The initial effort against the target was PBIMPULSE: It was
introduced into the target using LIFEAT assets and was actuated from
the LIPEAT VI basehouse. This is mentioned only to complete the record
and does not pertain to the intent of this discussion. Properly
speaking the initial effort begins with the activation of LIFEAT/
LIERODE in February 1950, as indicated in mot 12358. Subsequently
eight (8) LICOOL attempts were made during 1960-1961 against the same
target. The LICOOLE were monitored from a mobile LP (not LIFIRE),
Basehouse ABLE and Basehouse BAKER, and the latter came to be referred
to as the LIERODE base. The most productive operation of this sort
seems to have been LICOOL/11, activated on 9 May 1959, according to
HEXI 3884, dated 15 May 1959. According to our records the last LICOOL
ceased functioning during late 1961. Please confirm.
Attachment - U/B/C
Distribution
0 & 1 - COS, Mexico City w/att
i
CROSS REFERENCE TO
1
1
1
1
-
-
.
CS COPY
50
CATE
6 - 3.2/6
N
DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER
HMHW 12454
OFFICE.
CLASSIFICATION
SECRET
OFFICER
WH/3/Mexico/L Sanchez
1 April 1964
HQS FILE NUMBER
50-6-32/6
MEGNATING
TYPIST
rg
ENTE
5940
RI
Chrono
TSD/ASD
TSD/Photo
OFFICE SYMBOL
DAIL
WH/FI inby
TSD/ASB
TSD/Photo
6
COORDINATING
OFFICER'S NAME
3 full of F. J. Green
FORM 53 USE PREVIOUS EDITION
لوا
OFFICE SYMBOL
DATE
C/WHD
..
RELEASING
01.
J. C King
DISPATCH
13-00000
-
MAR 18 '97 06:55PM
.
'm
DISPATCH SYML AND NUMBER
CONTINUATION OF
DISPATCH
KAPOK
SECRET
HW 12454
P.7
At that time a different technique was planned. The following
briefly outlines the development of the operations which the Station
habitually refers to as "NETRAP":
15 February 1962: Request for operation received
MKCHARITY by Harvey C. MULFORD,
8 Feb.-Mar.1962: Design and construction of HKTRAP.
9 March 1962 : MKTRAP delivered to LIFEAT CO for
placement in target area.
•
10 March 1962 : HKTRAP installed by LIFEAT assets and
initial LP tests performed from LIFEAT VI basehouse
with negative results.
=
14. March 1962 : LP tests conducted with revised series
line connections with positive results.
6-13 April 1962: Design and construction of LP equipment.
16 April 1962 Installaction of LP equipment in
LIFEAT VI bakehouse.
MKTRAP, although moved from room to room, remained in place within
the target area, though inactive most of the time. During November
1963 METRAP was re-actuated from a second LIFEAT basehouse known as
Basshouse CHARLIE.
5. The photo surveillance of PERUMEN TPELIDE was put into effect,
using basehouse BAKER (LIBRODE Rese) at the same time that MXTRAP was
actuated. This photo coverage, the basehouse, PBRUMEN TPRLIDE and the
activity for which the cryptonya was first authorized have all been
identified as LIKRODE which has created considerable confusion here at
Headquarters.
8, According to scanty leadquarter's records the following
operations have utilized these bases against the target:
. PBIMPULSE
b.
LICOOLS
c.
LIFEAT/LIERODE
d. "MITRAP"
PHOTO
LIFEAT VI
Basehouses ABLE and BAKER
LIFEAT VI
LIFEAT VI, Basehouse
BAKER, Busehouse CHARLIE
Basehouse BAKER
Headquarters has the impression that the principal factors that
contributed to the suspenzion of MATRAP activity from LIFEAT 
VI
, were
the physical deterioration of the house itself and the divorce of the
basehouse keepers. The current LINEAT Project Outline indicates 
that
LIFEUD 14 and LIFAUD 17 ware obtaining a divorce and were 
terminated
as of 30 September 1962. Headquarters assumes they were the occupants
of LIFEAT VI, yet the project outline does not show 
that the base was
closed. · LIFEAT VI was listed on page 20 of the 
outline as an active
unit. On the other hand, page 15 of the outline states 
that LIFEUD 
22
and LIFEUD 23 are occupying the "LIERODE photo 
basehouse", but that
This indicates that
they have never been involved in. LIFEAT work.
LIFEAT/LIKROS and the photo work against the PBRUMEN target are now
The project 
outline
being conducted from two different basehouses.
also indicates that while it had been planned to have this base serve
FORM
5.43 53a
1401
USE PREVIOUS EDITION
CLASSIFICATION
KAPOK
SECRET
PAGE NO.
ย
CONTINUED
13-00000
· MAR 18 '97
06:56PM
"
CONTINUATION OF
DISPATCH
CLASSIFICATION
UIGPAIGN SYMBOL ANE NUNBLA
КАРОК.
SECRET
* 12454
P.8
"LIFEAT/KXTRAP", technical difficulties made this impossible,
therefore these two agents were not being included under LIFEAT
Project. When MKTRAP was re-nctuated in November 1963 and as stated
above, the Station utilized another LIFEAT basehouse, also called
basohouse CHARLIE, situated approximately six milow from target.
Please confirm the accuracy of the foregoing and supplement it by
informing Headquarters the basehouses and keepers involved and the
operations they are currently monitoring:
7. Headquarters requests Station's comments on the following.
suggestions:
1. Photographic coverage. That a separate project be
prepared to Include LYFEUD 22 and 23. The project should
cover their salaries, basehouse rent, and equipment
expenses, an arrangement similar to LITABBY and LIDOGTROT.
This activity, identified with a new cryptonym would
eliminate further confusion when discussing photographic
coverage of PBRUMEN TPELIDE.
"
8. LICOOL. Headquarters is not aware of any LICOOLS
presently operative. If any are contemplated, CSI-52-6, 27
February 1958, requires special Headquarters 
approval prior
to any action taken. If successful, a decision can be made
at that time whether a new project is necessary or whether
it can adequately be covered undor LIFEAT, depending on
the assets being utilized in the operation.
c. LIBRODE. The original intent of this cryptonym is
discussed in the separate cover attachment and the activity
If the operation
has been assigned file number 50-6-33/6.
utilizes LIFEAT assets, it is suggested that it remain.
under LIFEAT Project and be identified as LIFEAT
/
LIEROUS in
all correspondence. Please inform Headquarters of the assets
presently used for LIFEAT/LIERODE coverage.
:
.
It
d. MKTRAP. KURIOT would prefer the Station not use this
cryptonym in reporting this particular type of coverage.
is suggested that a new cryptonym, in the LI series, 
be
utilized to reference this activity. The present cryptonym
refers to a technique which has progressed from the
developmental into the operational stage and should more
appropriately be identified with a regular Station cryptonym.
If this operation is being worked by LIFEAT assets
, then
it might be identified with a dual cryptonym LIFEAT/LI. A
separate file number, within the LIFEAT series, can 
be
assigned to cover "¼KTRAP" if the Station requests 
it
, but
It does not seem necessary since other LIFEAT targets 
do 
not
have separate file numbers either.
-
e. Consolidated Project. If the Station prefers, all
technical operations LIERODE, MKTRAP, LICOOL, PHOTO
directed against PBRUMEN TPELICE can be funded and
administered under one project.
FORK
5. 53α DEC PREVIOUS EDITION.
401
OLIVER G. GALBOND
54-6-321:
CS COPY
CLASSIFICATION
PACE NO.
CONTINUES
3
13-00000
MAR 18 '97 06:56PM
ATTACHMENT TO
HHMW 12454
P.9
CRYPTONYM A
-'
CRYPTONYM B
!
-
CRYPTONYM
-
CRYPTONYM D
CRYPTONYM E
-
used to identify Station's unilateral telephone
taps.
Assigned on 21 February 1959, to identify the
Station's unilateral telephone tap of the
PBRUMEN TPELIDE in Mexico City. (See
MEXI 3382, February 21, 1959)
.
Identifiek the technical nomenclature;of a
hot mike telephone A/S installation. Detaila
of the system are contained in HMMA 20307.
Concealed microphones.
Hot nike telephone.
56-0-32/6
12454
CS COPY
13-00000
MAR 18 '97 06:57PM
Status in system:
09-16-96aer
JFK RECORDS
Cross Reference: None
AGENCY: ESCA
RECORD NUMBER: 180-10142-10087
RECORD SERIES : CIA SEGREGATED COLLECTION
AGENCY FILE NUMBER : 23-06-03
Other Agency Equity: None
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR : ESCA
FROM i
1. THE WARREN COMMISSION AND MEXICO
DATE: 00/00/78
PAGES:
62
DOCUMENT TYPE : REPORT
SUBJECT(S) : MEXICO, WC; CIA, FILES,
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
RESTRICTIONS : 3
CURRENT STATUS: POSTPONED IN PART
DATE OF LAST REVIEW 1 08/07/95
COMMENTS: Box 12
Date in: 01/26/96
FFFF
P.10
13-00000
MAR 18 '97
06:57PM
P.11
WHO
Waren
The commission and
mexico
Info from cable chrono, Oswald's
and
+ DecembeW.X-7241.
21,1963
21, 1963
.
1 DIR 90466 (420-757).
orig: Whitten ]
ROO
11.
-IN-PASSING INF
femmiSSION
< TO 
WARRER
bath of Helms.
Our present plan is to
eliminate mention of
[telephone trips) in order
protect your continuing
ops "They plasmon relying
instead on buran and
pasteg
love
file given to the
State Department arks
that [spenatration agents]
be
collaboration of ours
story (No. R.S).
B January 30,01964
DIR 97829 (498-204)- NOTE: The
(
498-304
Communication chrono was
only examined septo an
Therefore, dhave not determ
mined. the Originator, AO
mined 
the
OURO of 
DIRS after this.
date)
13-00000
MAR 18 '97 06:58PM
P.12
2
ད་
This cable reports that Helms
appeared before the Warren
Commission on 28
re what the ma8 January
expected from the CIA. "On
Saturday, Feb we will
give Commission report
an Lee Oswald's activities
in Mexico, presented so as
to protect
and techniques Preview
your reporting
يجنبههد
sources
to uson
this subject and cable.
in anything additional
you may have in time
for us to include in
A
Part.". CRS indicates Scott,
Michelle Phillip innicatio
Goodpasture + "'e')
2. MEXI 8008
response to DIR. 97839
Oring + RO: Scott
reports that station has
reported all info available
It also notes that all
the infor, snoluding that
from the Soviet Embassy
[tags] was seported to
13-00000
MAR 18 '97
MAR
06:58PM
P.13
FBI's.
3
the pots mesi map Scatt
Ambassador 
mann.
points 
out that this
sinformation may have.
been included in Mexican
EBI reports. The indipodes and
that the CIA would have
been cited as
the sours
(RS indicates Scott White; }
Chillips, Manas
Goodpasture).
(503-310)
C. April 7, 1964.
State Department Cable
# 1725 (control 133)
-
informs Embassy that
Coleman, Slauson +
Willens plain travel
to mixion 8 April
pssppose.
a determine naturesite
of effort of U.S. investigating
agencies abroad
b insestigatione effort of
Mexican authorities
C. Consult US & mexi author-
ities seifurther investi-
gation if any is determined
necessange
13-00000
P.14
MAR 18 '97 06:59PM
4/3/78
HARDWAY
LIAISON
immays off" QKOPERA,
ŹR BLESS 'file 8/1/61-8/28/64
The Company conserves
Pra
fe
P
Publishing
2. a memo fry [Sumar W. Beckman
"CA/PROP" dated 8/21/61 deals
the publication and royalty
problems of[Milovan Dulses
books.
3. A blind memo dated 2/11/64
dearls & the status of
m@gotiations with ["Drayer
author of "Castros cubi
The legens
ounts He is
unwilling to update the
book but is open to the
possibility of doing another.
volume. He has introduced
the author of the memo to
two other Cubs who were
writing books: Justo Camillo
Hernandez and Ernesto
Betancourt.
4. Susan Watkins
says. ZR BLESS) was
subproject of [WUBONBON. ]
☐
T
ཉ་-བ་་
13-00000
MAR 18 '97
06:59PM
4/3/78
HARDWAY
ummary of [Wu Jandy]
Development and Plane
file.
P. 15
1. "Subject. + Project File Request
and Field notification of action"
dated 6/26/63 describes the
project
iragest 
aset opportuniting
a Developmental
project based in the 4.3.
sub-projects are to lie
targeted abroad.
Jojects
.
2. Project Action form dated.
8/28/63 signed by Karamessi
approves. a $65,000 budget
fan [WUTARY] for the fiscal
year 1963 (July) to 1964. (June)..
4. Memo dated 3/17/64. to ODO
ما
arm Tracy Barnes requests
бласу
that [ WELTAROY's] budget. be
reased to $80,000.
The requested increase is
needed to (a) unan
ticipated developmental charge
in connection with an
individual doing s
involving,
SPECIAL
work
ahatan American

13-00000
18 '97 07:00PM
2
P. 16
business advisoring g
ھے
همید
the production
(G) cover the
costs of
targeted at
ganda material
isitors
13-00000
P. 17
18 '97 07:00PM
HUNT · SUMMARY
filis reviewed...
Hardway,
4/7/78
[ECPOEN-WURABBIT] CorrespondENCE
folder 7, Box2,
2. WL RABBIT] TermiNATION
Folder 1; Box 1
3. MPS Project file (WaPUNDIT.]
included in cas!
Fridem Food
(CONDUit)
N's Service Institute
PASSES Spanish Affil
CONTENINTAL Press,
Press, 
INC.
there were 3
operations
مند
?" one time only
1963 - WURAISIN]
nd [WU TRANsit) which were
sponsible for publishing
two books each
There was one "one time only
operation in 1964 {WU.SENDER}
which was respon
responsible
bla 
four
publishing three books. There
wee proposal for (WUSINDER.)
was 
evidently
isa
but it
app ved.
not
SEGNET
=
13-00000
܀܀
8 '97
07:01PM
P. 18
Operational structure. There
one operation that was
primarily development
project. There was a
project
alving Prove and
publication. There wa
فيلم
jest involving the freedom
wind and distribution. There
was a project to provide
mesis service to foreign
ress through Contenente o
Ps. Prior to 1963. the
development.
roject funds
were used for book
ocurement.
M. FY 63-64
book procurement was
made a seperate project.
Funds for this project were
chamaeled to region through
the meedom Fe
守
4. MPS. Project File ( Will BONBON]
5
6.
"
" [ WU HUSTLER]
·PAR+ I of 3.
WUBONBON] Accounting & Folder 24
4443
13-00000
97 07:02PM
P. 19
2 [ WABONBON ] Operations 1.6%.
folder. 25
Contains two memos for the
Records by Huntre 8/8/63
meetings
8. [WUPUNDIT] Support folder ??
9 | WU PUNDIT (WUBONBON]] fold er 26
10] UJJU BONBON] Development + Plans F19
WUBONBON] Polikoy Papers
"1
12
F 20:
72 | WUPUNDIT] CIA Book Publishing
F-28429.
13 WU BONBON] FY 65 Support
F.21
14 WUPUNDIT/WUBONBON] Support
F 23+22