Text: Alternatively, an interpretation of the presence requirement that required H-2A workers to be present in the United States throughout the course of the representation would eviscerate their right to legal representation altogether.
Entailment: An interpretation of the presences requirement that required H-2A workers to be present would be detrimental to their representation.
Contradiction: An interpretation requiring presence throughout the course of representation for H-2A workers would greatly benefit their right to legal representation.