Text: Taking note of the generally conservative impulse of New York's legal community, Mr. Curnin suggested that the multiple pro bono aspect of Dean Glen's sweeping proposal could be lost on judges who might dismiss the matter in terms of a bar exam procedural issue with a social good patina.
Entailment: Mr. Curnin thought that judges might dismiss the proposal because New York's legal community tends to be conservative.
Contradiction: Mr. Curnin believed the pro bono factor of the proposal would lead judges to support it.