Text: Finally, in compliance with section 604(a)(5), the analysis describes the significant alternatives considered and rejected, including universal applicability to commercial mobile voice services, automatic exclusion of all rural cellular carriers, and a Commission-developed set of standards for implementation.
Entailment: Significant alternatives were considered in compliance with section 604(a)(5), however they were rejected according to the analysis.
Contradiction: There was no description in the analysis of the significant alternatives of the significant alternatives that were considered.