Text: There are no court decisions in the relevant jurisdiction that support Starr on the notion that leaking what people tell investigators before they testify about what they will testify to is OK.
Entailment: There is no legal precedent to support that it's okay for a reporter to leak what someone plans to say when they testify before they actually testify.
Contradiction: There is legal precedent establishing it's acceptable for an investigator to tell the public what a witness tells them they will say in their testimony prior to actually testifying.