Research task (General Consumer Research):
Help me compile a list of apartments in San Francisco (looking for at least 2 bedroom, 1 living room, 1 bathroom, 1 kitchen). For context, I am moving to SF for just the summer (about 2-3 months) for work--ideally I want the apartment to be around central SF due to close proximity to the office--and am completely new to the area. Also, I'm a student, so realistically my individual budget for rent is at a max of $2200 per month (I want an apartment with minimal additional fees/costs). I plan to move in with one cat, and am also looking for roommates (around 1-2) to split the cost. I am also bringing a car, so I will also need to find parking spots. I also really prioritize safety (in terms of the area) and exercise (local gym or, even better, if it's offered by the apartment complex). I'm honestly not too sure how much I will spend overall because I want to be as close as possible to most sightseeing places and attractions in SF to gain as many new experiences and friends as possible over the summer.

Evaluation rubric:
criterion: The response clearly discerns that the total rent per person per month does not exceed $2,200, and therefore the total cost for apartments with 2-3 bedrooms should fall within the range of $4,400-$6,600.
weight: 5
axis: Synthesis of Information

criterion: The response shows two ways to find roommates (e.g., online platforms like Roomster or SpareRoom, leveraging social media groups (e.g., university-specific Facebook pages), using a university's dedicated roommate-matching service, or asking within a personal network of friends or coworkers).
weight: 5
axis: Synthesis of Information

criterion: The response analyzes different ways to split rent when the student has one roommate in the case of a two-bedroom apartment (e.g., the rent is divided evenly, one roommate pays more for a larger bedroom, one person covers utilities while the other pays a higher portion of the base rent, the rent is adjusted to reflect one person having a private bathroom).
weight: 3
axis: Synthesis of Information

criterion: The response mentions possible rent-splitting arrangements if the student has two roommates in the case of a three-bedroom apartment (e.g., the total rent is divided equally among three people, the cost is tiered based on bedroom size or amenities such as a private bathroom, one person pays a larger share for a master suite, one person covers shared household expenses while the others contribute more toward rent).
weight: 3
axis: Synthesis of Information

criterion: The response discusses safety by referencing various methods for evaluating a neighborhood's crime statistics within a certain radius (e.g., official crime rate data from police department websites, real-time alerts from apps like Citizen or Ring, anecdotal evidence gathered from asking local friends or searching online forums, data from third-party safety score websites).
weight: 3
axis: Explicit Criteria

criterion: The response list at least 2 methods of contact to reach the landlord/landlady of each apartment complex (e.g., email, phone number, online applications, link to website)
weight: 2
axis: Communication Quality

criterion: The responses includes an apartment with a long-term apartment lease (longer than time range given in the prompt, e.g., a 1-year lease) on the list of recommended apartments for the student
weight: -4
axis: Synthesis of Information

criterion: The response discusses at least 3 specific attractions/locations that are pet-oriented for the user to visit in his free time in San Francisco (e.g., parks, grooming, vet, pet stores)
weight: 2
axis: Synthesis of Information

criterion: The response discusses at least six prominent San Francisco neighborhoods known for their cultural or historical significance (and thus well-suited for sightseeing), mentioning key attractions and their typical commute distances to downtown (e.g., North Beach for its Italian heritage and proximity to Coit Tower, Haight-Ashbury for its 1960s counterculture history, the Mission for its vibrant murals and historic Mission Dolores, Chinatown for its iconic Dragon’s Gate, Japantown with its Peace Pagoda and unique cultural centers, Fisherman’s Wharf with its sea lions and historic piers).
weight: 4
axis: Synthesis of Information

criterion: The response discusses potential perks and features that may be offered by each apartment (e.g., access to a 24/7 concierge or doorman, a full-access mailroom with email updates, on-site co-working spaces or work pods, unique lifestyle amenities like a rooftop deck, a pool, a FITNESS SF center).
weight: 1
axis: Synthesis of Information

criterion: The response discusses food options near each suggested apartment neighborhood or location (e.g., grocery stores, restaurants, fast food places like Burger King, healthy options like Supergreens, and casual spots like Chipotle or Panda Express).
weight: 3
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: The response warns the user about at least 1 potential scam they might encounter during their apartment rental search (e.g., listings that are unavailable, appear too good to be true, lack contact information, have addresses that don’t match on Google Maps)
weight: 1
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: The response recommends at least 3 potential gym options for the user, including both nearby commercial gyms and apartment-included gyms (e.g., luxury buildings like Solaire have two in-building gyms accessible to residents, while older apartments in Hayes Valley may be a five-minute walk from commercial gyms like FITNESS SF, which charges a monthly fee of around $100, more budget-friendly options such as 24 Hour Fitness, or specialized studios like Orangetheory Fitness for strength training or Pilates).
weight: 5
axis: Explicit Criteria

criterion: The response provides quantifiable information in at least two instances, selecting any two from the following categories: rent, square footage, number of bedrooms, or permitted number of roommates.
weight: 1
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: The response provides apartments that have at least 2 bedrooms, 1 bathroom, 1 kitchen, and 1 living room (an apartment must meet all conditions here in order to meet the specifications set by the user in their prompt).
weight: 5
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: The response discusses the overall social culture of each apartment complex (e.g., the typical noise levels on weekdays versus weekends, the presence of resident community activities like social hours or holiday parties, the availability of shared spaces that encourage interaction, the general demographic of the residents (e.g., young professionals, families, students)).
weight: 1
axis: Explicit Criteria

criterion: Response mentions at least two central San Francisco neighborhoods (e.g., SoMa, Mission, Hayes Valley, Nob Hill, Lower Pacific Heights) in proximity to central San Francisco.
weight: 1
axis: Explicit Criteria

criterion: The response outlines the timelines for each listed apartment that is recommended (e.g., total lease duration, when rent is due, potential move-in dates, move-out dates, response deadline for claiming the apartment)
weight: 3
axis: Explicit Criteria

criterion: The response acknowledges at least two factors that may generally affect the availability of an apartment listing on its respective website (e.g., high demand, seasonal fluctuations, pending leases, recent price changes).
weight: 1
axis: Explicit Criteria

criterion: The response discusses at least two insurance or legal considerations for renting apartments in San Francisco (e.g., the common requirement for renter’s insurance to cover personal property, liability, and additional living expenses in case of a covered loss, the importance of understanding the lease agreement, including clauses related to subletting, guest policies, or early termination fees, and legal protections afforded to tenants in California, including a landlord’s responsibility to provide a habitable living space and state laws on rent control and eviction, which may vary depending on the building’s age and the specific lease type).
weight: 1
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: The response develops an estimated potential budget outlining how much the user might spend in at least 6 different categories of expenses (e.g., utilities, groceries, rent, or any other additional expenses that the student should be prepared to pay throughout their stay).
weight: 3
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: The response discusses the apartment's policy regarding overnight guests or noise levels, which can be relevant for a student who wants to make new friends (e.g., building policy requiring guests to be registered at the front desk for security, a policy that limits guest stays to a maximum number of nights, a building with strict quiet hours after 10 PM, a policy that is more flexible and relies on general noise ordinances)
weight: 1
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: The response briefly provides key details summarizing each potential gym listed (i.e., membership costs, a summary of the gym, benefits or perks, offered amenities such as pools / showers).
weight: 1
axis: Explicit Criteria

criterion: The response mentions the furnishings already provided in each recommended apartment (e.g., desks, chairs, tables, couches or sofas, beds).
weight: 1
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: The response discusses the services/amenities offered by the apartment (e.g., WiFi, mailing services, gyms, pools)
weight: 2
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: The response discusses at least 1 factor that may cause fluctuations in apartment rental prices for each of the listed apartments (seasonal demand in the summer months for internships, opening up of new public transportation, recent renovations or upgrades).
weight: 1
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: The response lists at least four social venues in central San Francisco where the student can meet new people to make friends (e.g., concerts, large social gatherings, hobby-related clubs)
weight: 4
axis: Instruction Following

criterion: The response quantitatively states an approximate travel/commute time between each apartment and Central San Francisco (measurement of proximity to the general area of the student's work).
weight: 3
axis: Communication Quality

criterion: The response lists only apartments that are eligible for short-term leases during the summer (approximately from June to August).
weight: 1
axis: Instruction Following

criterion: The response proposes at least two alternative short-term housing options beyond apartments (e.g., sublets, co-living arrangements, couch surfing).
weight: 1
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: The response discusses the availability of official month-to-month leases, noting that some places offer them while others do not (e.g., corporate-managed buildings like Avalon or Essex Property Trust offering month-to-month renewals after an initial lease term (typically at a higher rate), smaller, independently owned apartments on sites like Craigslist with more flexible terms, luxury high-rises like The Solaire or Nema with specific short-term lease options, etc., while rent-controlled buildings that rarely offer month-to-month arrangements from the outset).
weight: 2
axis: Synthesis of Information

criterion: The response mentions that sublets are a potential option for finding a place to live, noting that this is often the most common and flexible way to secure a short-term, month-to-month lease in San Francisco (e.g., many of these opportunities are found on platforms like Craigslist, Facebook housing groups, university housing forums, etc., where a current tenant is looking to fill a room).
weight: 2
axis: Synthesis of Information

criterion: The response mentions that the person should find temporary accommodation, such as a hotel or Airbnb, with no roommates and live alone for the term.
weight: -3
axis: Explicit Criteria