Research task (General Consumer Research):
i'm a remote software engineer in SF. its getting too expensive. i make $120k. i want to relocate somewhere else in the US. i need you to do the research for me and give me a ranked list of your top 3 cities.

here are my non-negotaibles:
- the cost of living HAS to be at least 30% lower than sf. especially rent and healthcare
- since i'm remote, I need high speed and reliable internet connection
- i really don't want to be stuck in a car. i need a walkable neighborhood (like a walk score over 60?) and easy access to green spaces or nature for hiking
- I also need a major airport within about 90 minutes

can you write up a detailed report for me? i need them ranked with good justifications. please also include the trade-offs like what's the weather really like, what are the state tax implications (huge for me coming from CA), diversity, amenities, that kind of stuff

it's important this is backed by real data, not just vibes. like use actual cost of living indexes, real estate data, internet speed rankings, ect

Evaluation rubric:
criterion: Response accurately states the cost of living in San Francisco, using it as a baseline. For example, In 2025, San Francisco’s median rent is around $3,733/month (Zillow, Oct 2025), average health insurance costs about $746/month (KFF, 2024), and basic living expenses such as food, utilities, and transport are roughly $1,625/month (Numbeo, 2025), totaling about $6,105 per month or $73,260 per year.
weight: 5
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: Response provides cost of living data for each recommended city, with cited source. For example, The cost of living in Austin, TX is about 33% lower than San Francisco, with median rent around $1,990/month (Zillow, 2025) and average monthly expenses (excluding rent) of $1,250 (Numbeo, 2025).
weight: 5
axis: Instruction Following

criterion: Response demonstrates that all recommended cities meet the 30% cost-of-living reduction constraint.
weight: 5
axis: Instruction Following

criterion: Response includes rent and healthcare data as part of the cost-of-living comparison.
weight: 5
axis: Instruction Following

criterion: Response identifies a major airport within 90 minutes of each city.
weight: 5
axis: Instruction Following

criterion: Response provides internet availability and speed data (e.g., BroadbandNow, FCC, Ookla).
weight: 5
axis: Instruction Following

criterion: Response includes walkability scores from a recognized source (e.g., Walk Score).
weight: 5
axis: Instruction Following

criterion: Response mentions presence and accessibility of green spaces, trails, or public parks. For example, the response highlights that Austin, TX offers extensive green spaces such as Zilker Park and the Lady Bird Lake Trail, providing over 10 miles of walkable waterfront paths and frequent outdoor events.
weight: 5
axis: Instruction Following

criterion: Response cites data sources clearly (e.g., Numbeo, Zillow, BroadbandNow, Walk Score).
weight: 5
axis: Instruction Following

criterion: All three cities are in the U.S. and reflect geographic diversity. For example, the response recommendations Austin, TX (South), Raleigh, NC (East), and Salt Lake City, UT (West) - all lie within the United States and collectively represent strong geographic diversity, covering the South, East Coast, and Mountain West regions.
weight: 3
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: Response clearly ranks the top 3 cities in order of overall suitability.
weight: 5
axis: Explicit Criteria

criterion: Response explains reasoning behind each ranking decision. For example, the response ranks Austin, TX first due to its strong tech scene, reliable gigabit internet, and vibrant culture at 35% lower cost than San Francisco. Raleigh, NC is second for its balance of affordability, safety, and excellent healthcare, though summers are humid. Salt Lake City, UT ranks third for its access to national parks and outdoor recreation, but its lower diversity and colder winters make it slightly less ideal for year-round livability.
weight: 5
axis: Explicit Criteria

criterion: Response describes at least two trade-offs per city (e.g., weather, taxes, diversity).
weight: 5
axis: Instruction Following

criterion: Response analyzes tax implications (e.g., income tax, state/local taxes).
weight: 5
axis: Instruction Following

criterion: Response includes information about local amenities (e.g., food, culture, public transport).
weight: 5
axis: Instruction Following

criterion: Response mentions climate or seasonal weather conditions. For example, the response mention Austin’s hot summers, Raleigh’s mild winters and humid summers, and Salt Lake City’s cold, snowy winters.
weight: 5
axis: Instruction Following

criterion: Response identifies population size or growth trends. For example, it notes Austin’s rapid population growth, Raleigh’s steady in-migration, and Salt Lake City’s mid-sized population (~205,000) with moderate growth.
weight: 3
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: Report is formatted with clear sections and bullet points or tables for comparison.
weight: 3
axis: Communication Quality

criterion: Response includes a final recommendation with a clear summary of decision logic.
weight: 3
axis: Communication Quality

criterion: Response includes subjective or overly vague descriptions (e.g., "nice weather" or "good vibes").
weight: -3
axis: Communication Quality

criterion: Response hallucinates city data (e.g., walkability, cost of living, airport proximity).
weight: -5
axis: Explicit Criteria

criterion: Response fails to include at least three recommended cities.
weight: -5
axis: Explicit Criteria

criterion: Report omits any one of the core constraints (e.g., walkability, internet).
weight: -5
axis: Instruction Following

criterion: Response fails to cite sources for data it presents.
weight: -4
axis: References & Citation Quality

criterion: Report is disorganized or lacks technical clarity. For example, the respinse jumps between cities without clear sections or data; mixes rent, weather, and internet stats in one paragraph with no sources.
weight: -3
axis: Communication Quality

criterion: Response overstates benefits without supporting data (e.g., "City X is the best for everyone").
weight: -4
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: Response discusses a Support Infrastructure for Remote Work. For example, the response notes that Austin offers Google Fiber and AT&T Fiber with speeds up to 5 Gbps.
weight: 4
axis: Instruction Following

criterion: Response includes Real Estate Market and Growth Projections. For example, "Austin’s home values rose 4.2% year-over-year (Zillow, 2025)". 
weight: 3
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: Response incorporates at least one recognized quality‐of‐life index (e.g., US News, Mercer) to support city comparisons.
weight: 3
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: Response provides a Comparative Analysis of Disposable Income. For example, it explains that after adjusting for rent and taxes, a $120,000 salary yields about $78,000 disposable income in Austin, $80,000 in Raleigh, and $75,000 in Salt Lake City, compared to only $55,000 in San Francisco.
weight: 4
axis: Synthesis of Information

criterion: Response includes housing market metrics (e.g., median home price, rental rates, vacancy rates) from reputable real estate sources.
weight: 5
axis: References & Citation Quality

criterion: Report includes an executive summary or highlights section and uses scannable formatting (bullet points, tables, visuals) for quick comprehension.
weight: 3
axis: Communication Quality

criterion: Response presents an Environmental and Disaster Risk Assessment. For example, the response highlights that Austin is prone to summer heat exceeding 100°F and flash flooding along Barton Creek.
weight: 3
axis: Implicit Criteria

criterion: Response provides an analysis of Neighborhood Variation. For example, the response compares East Austin (trendy, walkable, average rent $2,100/month) with Cedar Park (family-friendly suburb, rent $1,700/month) and Mueller (mixed-use eco-district near downtown, rent $2,400/month), highlighting differences in affordability, amenities, and commute times.
weight: 3
axis: Implicit Criteria