Package: netharn
UPDATE 2021-10-05: Netharn as a Training loop will no longer be maintained. Use
pytorch-lightning instead. This library may slowly morph into an extension of
lightning.The main webpage for this project is:https://gitlab.kitware.com/computer-vision/netharnIf you want a framework for your pytorch training loop that
(1) chooses directory names based on hashes of hyperparameters,
(2) can write a single-file deployment of your model by statically auto-extracting the in-code definition of the model topology and zipping it with the weights,
(3) has brief terminal output and a rich logging output,
(4) has rule-based monitoring of validation loss and can reduce the learning rate or early stop,
(5) has tensorboard and/or matplotlib visualizations of training statistics, and
(6) is designed to be extended, then you might be interested in NetHarn.NAME:NetHarn (pronounced “net-harn”)FRAMEWORK:PyTorchFEATURES:hyperparameter trackingtraining directory managementcallback-based public APIXPU - code abstraction for [cpu, gpu, multi-gpu].single-file deployments (NEW in version0.1.0).reasonable test coverage using pytest and xdoctestCI testing on appveyor and travis (note a few tests are failing due to minor issues)A rich utility setExtensions of PyTorch objects (e.g. critions, initializers, layers,
optimizers, schedulers)BUILTINS:training loop boilerplatesnapshots / checkpointsprogress bars (backend_choices: [progiter, tqdm])data provenance of training history intrain_info.jsontensorboard metric visualization (optional)DESIGN PHILOSOPHY:Avoid boilerplate, built-it yourself when you need to, and don’t repeat yourself.
Experiments should be strongly tied to the choice of hyperparameters, and
the framework should be able to construct a directory heirarchy based on
these hyperparameters.SLOGAN:Rein and train.USAGE PATTERNS:Write code for a torch object  (i.e. Dataset, Model, Criterion, Initializer, and Scheduler) just as you normally would.Inherit from thenetharn.FitHarnobject, definerun_batch,on_batch,on_epoch, etc…Create an instance ofnetharn.HyperParamsto specify your dataset, model, criterion, etc…Create an instance of yourFitHarnobject with those hyperparameters.Then execute itsrunmethod.???profitEXAMPLES:ToyData2d classification with netharn.models.ToyNet2d (see doctest in netharn/fit_harn.py:__DOC__:0)MNIST digit classification with MnistNet (netharn/examples/mnist.py)Cifar10 category classification with ResNet50 / dpn91 (netharn/examples/cifar.py)Voc2007+2012 object detection with YOLOv2 (netharn/examples/yolo_voc.py)IBEIS metric learning with SiameseLP (netharn/examples/siam_ibeis.py)STABILITY:Mostly harmless. Most tests pass, the current failures are probably not
critical. I’m able to use it on my machine (tm). In this early stage of
development, there are still a few pain points. Issues and PRs welcome.KNOWN BUGS:The metrics for computing detection mAP / AP might not be correct.The YOLO example gets to about 70% mAP (using Girshik’s mAP code) whereas we should be hitting 74-76%AUTHORS COMMENTS:The MNIST, CIFAR, and VOC examples will download the data as needed.The CIFAR example for ResNet50 achieves 95.72% accuracy, outperforming the
best DPN92 result (95.16%) that I’m aware of.
This result seems real, I do not believe I’ve made an error in measurement
(but this has need been peer-reviewed so, caveat emptor).  I’ve reproduced
this results a few times. You can use the code in examples/cifar.py to see
if you can too (please tell me if you cannot).The YOLO example is based of of EAVise’s excellent lightnet (https://gitlab.com/EAVISE/lightnet/) package.I reimplemented the CocoAPI (see netharn.data.coco_api), because I had some
(probably minor) issue with the original implementation. I’ve extended it
quite a bit, and I’d recommend using it.The metric-learning example requires code requires the ibeis software:https://github.com/Erotemic/ibeis.DEPENDENCIES:torchnumpyCythonubeltxdoctest… (see requirements.txt)Features (continued)Hyperparameter tracking: The hash of your hyperparameters determines the
directory data will be written to. We also allow for a “nicer” means to
manage directory structures. Given aHyperParamsobject, we create the
symlink{workdir}/fit/name/{name}which points to{workdir}/fit/runs/{name}/{hashid}.Automatic restarts:
CallingFitHarn.runtwice restarts training from where you left off by
default (as long as the hyperparams haven’t changed).“Smart” Snapshot cleanup:
Maintaining model weights files can be a memory hog. Depending the settings
ofharn.preferences,netharn.FitHarnwill periodically remove
less-recent or low-scoring snapshots.Deployment files:
Model weights and architecture are together written as one
reasonably-portable zip-file. We also package training metadata to maintain
data provinence and make reproducing experiments easier.Restart from any pretrained state:
usenetharn.initializers.PretainedInitializer.Utilities for building networks in torch:
Layers likenetharn.layers.ConvNormNdmake it easy to build networks for
n=1, 2, or 3 dimensional data.Analytic output shape and receptive field:
Netharn defines anetharn.layers.AnalyticModule, which can automatically
defineforward,output_shape_forandreceptive_field_forif users
define a special_output_formethod, written with thenetharn.analytic_for.Output,netharn.analytic_for.Hidden, andnetharn.analytic_for.OutputForspecial callables.Example tasks:
Baseline code for standard tasks like: object segmentation, classification,
and detection are defined innetharn.examples. The examples also provide
example use cases forndsampler,kwimage,kwannot, andkwplot.InstallationIn the future these instructions may actually be different than the developer
setup instructions, but for now they are the same.mkdir-p~/codegitclonegit@github.com:Erotemic/netharn.git~/code/netharncd~/code/netharn./run_developer_setup.shWhile all netharn dependencies should be available on pypi (with manylinux2010
wheels for binary packages), there are other packages developed concurrently
with netharn. To install the development version of these dependencies then runpython super_setup.py ensureto check out the repos and ensure they are on
the correct branch,python super_setup.py developto build everything in
development mode, andpython super_setup.py pullto update to the latest on
the branch.DescriptionParameterized fit harnesses for PyTorch.Trains models and keeps track of your hyperparameters.This is a clean port of the good parts developed in my research repo:clab.See the netharn/examples folder for example usage. The doctests are also a good
resource. It would be nice if we had better docs.NetHarn is a research framework for training and deploying arbitrary PyTorch
models.  It was designed for the purpose of minimizing training-loop
boilerplate and tracking hyperparameters to encourage reproducible research.
NetHarn separates the problem of training a model into the following core
hyperparameter components: the datasets, model, criterion, initializer,
optimizer, and learning rate scheduler.  Runs with different hyperparameters
are automatically logged to separate directories which makes it simple to
compare the results of two experiments.  NetHarn also has the ability to create
a single-file deployment of a trained model that is independent of the system
used to train it.  This makes it fast and simple for research results to be
externally verified and moved into production.Core Callback StructureNetharn is designed around inheriting from thenetharn.FitHarnclass,
overloading several methods, and then creating an instance of your custom
FitHarn with specific hyperparameters.FitHarn allows you to customize the execution of the training loop via its
callback system. You write a callback simply overloading one of these
methods. There are callbacks with and without default behavior.The ones with default behavior directly influence the learning process.
While these don’t have to be overwritten, they usually should be as
different tasks require slightly different ways of moving data through the
training pipeline.The ones without default behavior allow the developer to execute custom
code at special places in the training loop. These are usually used for
logging custom metrics and outputing visualizations.The following note lists the callbacks in roughly the order in which they are
called by theFitHarn.runmethod. The tree structure denotes loop nesting.├─ after_initialize (no default) - runs after FitHarn is initialized
│  │
│  ├─ before_epochs (no default) - runs once before all train/vali/test
│  │  │    epochs on each iteration
│  │  │
│  │  ├─ prepare_epoch (no default) - runs before each train, vali,
│  │  │  │    and test epoch
│  │  │  │
│  │  │  ├─ prepare_batch (has default behavior) - transfer data from
│  │  │  │    CPU to the XPU
│  │  │  │
│  │  │  ├─ run_batch (has default behavior) - execute the forward pass
│  │  │  │    and compute the loss
│  │  │  │
│  │  │  ├─ backpropogate (has default behavior) - accumulate gradients
│  │  │  │    and take an optimization step
│  │  │  │
│  │  │  └─ on_batch (no default) - runs after `run_batch` and
│  │  │       `backpropogate` on every batch
│  │  │
│  │  └─ on_epoch (no default) - runs after each train, vali, and test
│  │         epoch finishes.  Any custom scalar metrics returned in a
│  │         dictionary will be recorded by the FitHarn loggers.
│  │
│  └─ after_epochs (no default) - runs after the all data splits are
│         finished with  the current epoch.
│
└─ on_complete (no default) - runs after the main loop is completeGiven a custom FitHarn class see the “Toy Example” section for details on how
to construct hyperparamters and execute the training loop (i.e.FitHarn.run).Developer Setup:In the future these instructions might be different from the install
instructions, but for now they are the same.sudoapt-getinstallpython3python-devpython3-dev\build-essentiallibssl-devlibffi-dev\libxml2-devlibxslt1-devzlib1g-dev\python-pipmkdir-p~/codegitclonegit@github.com:Erotemic/netharn.git~/code/netharncd~/code/netharn./run_developer_setup.shDocumentationNetharn’s documentation is currently sparse. I typically do most of my
documenting in the code itself using docstrings. In the future much of this
will likely be consolidated in a read-the-docs style documentation page, but
for now you’ll need to look at the code to read the docs.The main concept provided by netharn is the “FitHarn”, which has a decent
module level docstring, and a lot of good class / method level docstrings:https://gitlab.kitware.com/computer-vision/netharn/-/blob/master/netharn/fit_harn.pyThe examples folder has better docstrings with task-level documentation:The simplest is the mnist example:https://gitlab.kitware.com/computer-vision/netharn/-/blob/master/netharn/examples/mnist.pyThe CIFAR example builds on the mnist example:https://gitlab.kitware.com/computer-vision/netharn/-/blob/master/netharn/examples/cifar.pyI’d recommend going through those two examples, as they have the best documentation.The segmentation example:https://gitlab.kitware.com/computer-vision/netharn/-/blob/master/netharn/examples/segmentation.pyand object detection example:https://gitlab.kitware.com/computer-vision/netharn/-/blob/master/netharn/examples/object_detection.pyhave less documentation, but provide more real-world style examples of how netharn is used.There is an applied segmentation example that is specific to the CAMVID dataset:https://gitlab.kitware.com/computer-vision/netharn/-/blob/master/netharn/examples/sseg_camvid.pyAnd there is an applied VOC detection example:https://gitlab.kitware.com/computer-vision/netharn/-/blob/master/netharn/examples/yolo_voc.pyThis README also contains a toy example.Toy Example:This following example is the doctest innetharn/fit_harn.py. It
demonstrates how to use NetHarn to train a model to solve a toy problem.In this toy problem, we do not extend the netharn.FitHarn object, so we are using
the default behavior ofrun_batch. The defaulton_batch, andon_epochdo nothing, so only loss will be the only measurement of
performance.For further examples please see the examples directory. These example show how
to extend netharn.FitHarn to measure performance wrt a particular problem.  The
MNIST and CIFAR examples are the most simple. The YOLO example is more complex.
The IBEIS example depends on non-public data / software, but can still be
useful to look at.  Its complexity is more than CIFAR but less than YOLO.>>>importnetharn>>>hyper=netharn.HyperParams(**{>>># ================>>># Environment Components>>>'name':'demo',>>>'workdir':ub.ensure_app_cache_dir('netharn/demo'),>>>'xpu':netharn.XPU.coerce('auto'),>>># workdir is a directory where intermediate results can be saved>>># "name" symlinks <workdir>/fit/name/<name> -> ../runs/<hashid>>>># XPU auto select a gpu if idle and VRAM>6GB else a cpu>>># ================>>># Data Components>>>'datasets':{# dict of plain ol torch.data.Dataset instances>>>'train':netharn.data.ToyData2d(size=3,border=1,n=256,rng=0),>>>'vali':netharn.data.ToyData2d(size=3,border=1,n=64,rng=1),>>>'test':netharn.data.ToyData2d(size=3,border=1,n=64,rng=2),>>>},>>>'loaders':{'batch_size':4},# DataLoader instances or kw>>># ================>>># Algorithm Components>>># Note the (cls, kw) tuple formatting>>>'model':(netharn.models.ToyNet2d,{}),>>>'optimizer':(netharn.optimizers.SGD,{>>>'lr':0.01>>>}),>>># focal loss is usually better than netharn.criterions.CrossEntropyLoss>>>'criterion':(netharn.criterions.FocalLoss,{}),>>>'initializer':(netharn.initializers.KaimingNormal,{>>>'param':0,>>>}),>>># The scheduler adjusts learning rate over the training run>>>'scheduler':(netharn.schedulers.ListedScheduler,{>>>'points':{'lr':{0:0.1,2:10.0,4:.15,6:.05,9:.01}},>>>'interpolation':'linear',>>>}),>>>'monitor':(netharn.Monitor,{>>>'max_epoch':10,>>>'patience':7,>>>}),>>># dynamics are a config option that modify the behavior of the main>>># training loop. These parameters effect the learned model.>>>'dynamics':{'batch_step':2},>>>})>>>harn=netharn.FitHarn(hyper)>>># non-algorithmic behavior preferences (do not change learned models)>>>harn.preferences['num_keep']=10>>>harn.preferences['auto_prepare_batch']=True>>># start training.>>>harn.initialize(reset='delete')# delete removes an existing run>>>harn.run()# note: run calls initialize it hasn't already been called.>>># xdoc: +IGNORE_WANTRunning this code produes the following output:RESET HARNESS BY DELETING EVERYTHING IN TRAINING DIR
Symlink: /home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum -> /home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/_mru
... already exists
Symlink: /home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum -> /home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/name/demo
... already exists
... and points to the right place
INFO: Initializing tensorboard (dont forget to start the tensorboard server)
INFO: Model has 824 parameters
INFO: Mounting ToyNet2d model on GPU(0)
INFO: Exported model topology to /home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum/ToyNet2d_2a3f49.py
INFO: Initializing model weights with: <netharn.initializers.nninit_core.KaimingNormal object at 0x7fc67eff0278>
INFO:  * harn.train_dpath = '/home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum'
INFO:  * harn.name_dpath  = '/home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/name/demo'
INFO: Snapshots will save to harn.snapshot_dpath = '/home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum/torch_snapshots'
INFO: ARGV:
    /home/joncrall/.local/conda/envs/py36/bin/python /home/joncrall/.local/conda/envs/py36/bin/ipython
INFO: dont forget to start:
    tensorboard --logdir ~/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/name
INFO: === begin training 0 / 10 : demo ===
epoch lr:0.0001 │ vloss is unevaluated  0/10... rate=0 Hz, eta=?, total=0:00:00, wall=19:36 EST
train loss:0.173 │ 100.00% of 64x8... rate=11762.01 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:36 EST
vali loss:0.170 │ 100.00% of 64x4... rate=9991.94 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:36 EST
test loss:0.170 │ 100.00% of 64x4... rate=24809.37 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:36 EST
INFO: === finish epoch 0 / 10 : demo ===
epoch lr:0.00505 │ vloss: 0.1696 (n_bad=00, best=0.1696)  1/10... rate=1.24 Hz, eta=0:00:07, total=0:00:00, wall=19:36 EST
train loss:0.175 │ 100.00% of 64x8... rate=13522.14 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:36 EST
vali loss:0.167 │ 100.00% of 64x4... rate=23598.31 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:36 EST
test loss:0.167 │ 100.00% of 64x4... rate=20354.22 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:36 EST
INFO: === finish epoch 1 / 10 : demo ===
epoch lr:0.01 │ vloss: 0.1685 (n_bad=00, best=0.1685)  2/10... rate=1.28 Hz, eta=0:00:06, total=0:00:01, wall=19:36 EST
train loss:0.177 │ 100.00% of 64x8... rate=15723.99 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:36 EST
vali loss:0.163 │ 100.00% of 64x4... rate=29375.56 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:36 EST
test loss:0.163 │ 100.00% of 64x4... rate=29664.69 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:36 EST
INFO: === finish epoch 2 / 10 : demo ===

<JUST MORE OF THE SAME; REMOVED FOR BREVITY>

epoch lr:0.001 │ vloss: 0.1552 (n_bad=00, best=0.1552)  9/10... rate=1.11 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:08, wall=19:36 EST
train loss:0.164 │ 100.00% of 64x8... rate=13795.93 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:36 EST
vali loss:0.154 │ 100.00% of 64x4... rate=19796.72 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:36 EST
test loss:0.154 │ 100.00% of 64x4... rate=21396.73 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:36 EST
INFO: === finish epoch 9 / 10 : demo ===
epoch lr:0.001 │ vloss: 0.1547 (n_bad=00, best=0.1547) 10/10... rate=1.13 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:08, wall=19:36 EST




INFO: Maximum harn.epoch reached, terminating ...
INFO:



INFO: training completed
INFO: harn.train_dpath = '/home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum'
INFO: harn.name_dpath  = '/home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/name/demo'
INFO: view tensorboard results for this run via:
    tensorboard --logdir ~/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/name
[DEPLOYER] Deployed zipfpath=/home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum/deploy_ToyNet2d_lnejaaum_009_GAEYQT.zip
INFO: wrote single-file deployment to: '/home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum/deploy_ToyNet2d_lnejaaum_009_GAEYQT.zip'
INFO: exiting fit harness.Furthermore, if you were to run that code when'--verbose'in sys.argv,
then it would produce this more detailed description of what it was doing:RESET HARNESS BY DELETING EVERYTHING IN TRAINING DIR
Symlink: /home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum -> /home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/_mru
... already exists
Symlink: /home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum -> /home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/name/demo
... already exists
... and points to the right place
DEBUG: Initialized logging
INFO: Initializing tensorboard (dont forget to start the tensorboard server)
DEBUG: harn.train_info[hyper] = {
    'model': (
        'netharn.models.toynet.ToyNet2d',
        {
            'input_channels': 1,
            'num_classes': 2,
        },
    ),
    'initializer': (
        'netharn.initializers.nninit_core.KaimingNormal',
        {
            'mode': 'fan_in',
            'param': 0,
        },
    ),
    'optimizer': (
        'torch.optim.sgd.SGD',
        {
            'dampening': 0,
            'lr': 0.0001,
            'momentum': 0,
            'nesterov': False,
            'weight_decay': 0,
        },
    ),
    'scheduler': (
        'netharn.schedulers.scheduler_redesign.ListedScheduler',
        {
            'interpolation': 'linear',
            'optimizer': None,
            'points': {'lr': {0: 0.0001, 2: 0.01, 5: 0.015, 6: 0.005, 9: 0.001}},
        },
    ),
    'criterion': (
        'netharn.criterions.focal.FocalLoss',
        {
            'focus': 2,
            'ignore_index': -100,
            'reduce': None,
            'reduction': 'mean',
            'size_average': None,
            'weight': None,
        },
    ),
    'loader': (
        'torch.utils.data.dataloader.DataLoader',
        {
            'batch_size': 64,
        },
    ),
    'dynamics': (
        'Dynamics',
        {
            'batch_step': 4,
            'grad_norm_max': None,
        },
    ),
}
DEBUG: harn.hyper = <netharn.hyperparams.HyperParams object at 0x7fb19b4b8748>
DEBUG: make XPU
DEBUG: harn.xpu = <XPU(GPU(0)) at 0x7fb12af24668>
DEBUG: Criterion: FocalLoss
DEBUG: Optimizer: SGD
DEBUG: Scheduler: ListedScheduler
DEBUG: Making loaders
DEBUG: Making model
DEBUG: ToyNet2d(
  (layers): Sequential(
    (0): Conv2d(1, 8, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(1, 1), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
    (1): BatchNorm2d(8, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
    (2): ReLU(inplace)
    (3): Conv2d(8, 8, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(1, 1), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
    (4): BatchNorm2d(8, eps=1e-05, momentum=0.1, affine=True, track_running_stats=True)
    (5): ReLU(inplace)
    (6): Conv2d(8, 2, kernel_size=(3, 3), stride=(1, 1), padding=(1, 1), bias=False)
  )
  (softmax): Softmax()
)
INFO: Model has 824 parameters
INFO: Mounting ToyNet2d model on GPU(0)
DEBUG: Making initializer
DEBUG: Move FocalLoss() model to GPU(0)
DEBUG: Make optimizer
DEBUG: Make scheduler
DEBUG: Make monitor
DEBUG: Make dynamics
INFO: Exported model topology to /home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum/ToyNet2d_2a3f49.py
INFO: Initializing model weights with: <netharn.initializers.nninit_core.KaimingNormal object at 0x7fb129e732b0>
DEBUG: calling harn.initializer=<netharn.initializers.nninit_core.KaimingNormal object at 0x7fb129e732b0>
INFO:  * harn.train_dpath = '/home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum'
INFO:  * harn.name_dpath  = '/home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/name/demo'
INFO: Snapshots will save to harn.snapshot_dpath = '/home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum/torch_snapshots'
INFO: ARGV:
    /home/joncrall/.local/conda/envs/py36/bin/python /home/joncrall/.local/conda/envs/py36/bin/ipython --verbose
INFO: dont forget to start:
    tensorboard --logdir ~/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/name
INFO: === begin training 0 / 10 : demo ===
DEBUG: epoch lr:0.0001 │ vloss is unevaluated
epoch lr:0.0001 │ vloss is unevaluated  0/10... rate=0 Hz, eta=?, total=0:00:00, wall=19:56 EST
DEBUG: === start epoch 0 ===
DEBUG: log_value(epoch lr, 0.0001, 0
DEBUG: log_value(epoch momentum, 0, 0
DEBUG: _run_epoch 0, tag=train, learn=True
DEBUG:  * len(loader) = 8
DEBUG:  * loader.batch_size = 64
train loss:-1.000 │ 0.00% of 64x8... rate=0 Hz, eta=?, total=0:00:00, wall=19:56 ESTDEBUG: Making batch iterator
DEBUG: Starting batch iteration for tag=train, epoch=0
train loss:0.224 │ 100.00% of 64x8... rate=12052.25 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:56 EST
DEBUG: log_value(train epoch loss, 0.22378234565258026, 0
DEBUG: Finished batch iteration for tag=train, epoch=0
DEBUG: _run_epoch 0, tag=vali, learn=False
DEBUG:  * len(loader) = 4
DEBUG:  * loader.batch_size = 64
vali loss:-1.000 │ 0.00% of 64x4... rate=0 Hz, eta=?, total=0:00:00, wall=19:56 ESTDEBUG: Making batch iterator
DEBUG: Starting batch iteration for tag=vali, epoch=0
vali loss:0.175 │ 100.00% of 64x4... rate=23830.75 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:56 EST
DEBUG: log_value(vali epoch loss, 0.1749105490744114, 0
DEBUG: Finished batch iteration for tag=vali, epoch=0
DEBUG: epoch lr:0.0001 │ vloss: 0.1749 (n_bad=00, best=0.1749)
DEBUG: _run_epoch 0, tag=test, learn=False
DEBUG:  * len(loader) = 4
DEBUG:  * loader.batch_size = 64
test loss:-1.000 │ 0.00% of 64x4... rate=0 Hz, eta=?, total=0:00:00, wall=19:56 ESTDEBUG: Making batch iterator
DEBUG: Starting batch iteration for tag=test, epoch=0
test loss:0.176 │ 100.00% of 64x4... rate=28606.65 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:56 EST
DEBUG: log_value(test epoch loss, 0.17605290189385414, 0
DEBUG: Finished batch iteration for tag=test, epoch=0
DEBUG: Saving snapshot to /home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum/torch_snapshots/_epoch_00000000.pt
DEBUG: Snapshot saved to /home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum/torch_snapshots/_epoch_00000000.pt
DEBUG: new best_snapshot /home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum/torch_snapshots/_epoch_00000000.pt
DEBUG: Plotting tensorboard data
Populating the interactive namespace from numpy and matplotlib
INFO: === finish epoch 0 / 10 : demo ===

<JUST MORE OF THE SAME; REMOVED FOR BREVITY>

INFO: === finish epoch 8 / 10 : demo ===
DEBUG: epoch lr:0.001 │ vloss: 0.2146 (n_bad=08, best=0.1749)
epoch lr:0.001 │ vloss: 0.2146 (n_bad=08, best=0.1749)  9/10... rate=1.20 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:07, wall=19:56 EST
DEBUG: === start epoch 9 ===
DEBUG: log_value(epoch lr, 0.001, 9
DEBUG: log_value(epoch momentum, 0, 9
DEBUG: _run_epoch 9, tag=train, learn=True
DEBUG:  * len(loader) = 8
DEBUG:  * loader.batch_size = 64
train loss:-1.000 │ 0.00% of 64x8... rate=0 Hz, eta=?, total=0:00:00, wall=19:56 ESTDEBUG: Making batch iterator
DEBUG: Starting batch iteration for tag=train, epoch=9
train loss:0.207 │ 100.00% of 64x8... rate=13580.13 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:56 EST
DEBUG: log_value(train epoch loss, 0.2070118673145771, 9
DEBUG: Finished batch iteration for tag=train, epoch=9
DEBUG: _run_epoch 9, tag=vali, learn=False
DEBUG:  * len(loader) = 4
DEBUG:  * loader.batch_size = 64
vali loss:-1.000 │ 0.00% of 64x4... rate=0 Hz, eta=?, total=0:00:00, wall=19:56 ESTDEBUG: Making batch iterator
DEBUG: Starting batch iteration for tag=vali, epoch=9
vali loss:0.215 │ 100.00% of 64x4... rate=29412.91 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:56 EST
DEBUG: log_value(vali epoch loss, 0.21514184772968292, 9
DEBUG: Finished batch iteration for tag=vali, epoch=9
DEBUG: epoch lr:0.001 │ vloss: 0.2148 (n_bad=09, best=0.1749)
DEBUG: _run_epoch 9, tag=test, learn=False
DEBUG:  * len(loader) = 4
DEBUG:  * loader.batch_size = 64
test loss:-1.000 │ 0.00% of 64x4... rate=0 Hz, eta=?, total=0:00:00, wall=19:56 ESTDEBUG: Making batch iterator
DEBUG: Starting batch iteration for tag=test, epoch=9
test loss:0.216 │ 100.00% of 64x4... rate=25906.58 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:00, wall=19:56 EST
DEBUG: log_value(test epoch loss, 0.21618007868528366, 9
DEBUG: Finished batch iteration for tag=test, epoch=9
DEBUG: Saving snapshot to /home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum/torch_snapshots/_epoch_00000009.pt
DEBUG: Snapshot saved to /home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum/torch_snapshots/_epoch_00000009.pt
DEBUG: Plotting tensorboard data
INFO: === finish epoch 9 / 10 : demo ===
DEBUG: epoch lr:0.001 │ vloss: 0.2148 (n_bad=09, best=0.1749)
epoch lr:0.001 │ vloss: 0.2148 (n_bad=09, best=0.1749) 10/10... rate=1.21 Hz, eta=0:00:00, total=0:00:08, wall=19:56 EST




INFO: Maximum harn.epoch reached, terminating ...
INFO:



INFO: training completed
INFO: harn.train_dpath = '/home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum'
INFO: harn.name_dpath  = '/home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/name/demo'
INFO: view tensorboard results for this run via:
    tensorboard --logdir ~/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/name
[DEPLOYER] Deployed zipfpath=/home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum/deploy_ToyNet2d_lnejaaum_000_JWPNDC.zip
INFO: wrote single-file deployment to: '/home/joncrall/.cache/netharn/demo/fit/runs/demo/lnejaaum/deploy_ToyNet2d_lnejaaum_000_JWPNDC.zip'
INFO: exiting fit harness.Related Packagespytorch-lightning (https://github.com/PyTorchLightning/pytorch-lightning) has
very similar goals to netharn. Currently, there are strengths and weaknesses to
both, but in the future I do see one consuming functionality of the other.
Currently (2020-10-21), pytorch-lightning does distributed training better,
whereas netharn’s logging and hyperparameter management outshines
pytorch-lightning.Consumer PackagesThe bioharn package (https://gitlab.kitware.com/jon.crall/bioharn) implements
extensions of the classifier and detector examples in the netharn/examples
folder as well as prediction and evaluation scripts.