Sansaboo/maud huggingface dataset:
6.3 No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> (d) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Section 6.3(a), if the Company has received a bona fide written Company Acquisition Proposal that (i) has not been withdrawn, (ii) did not result from a breach (other than a de minimis breach) of the obligations set forth in Section 6.3 and (iii) the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside counsel and a financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation, (A) constitutes a Superior Company Proposal and (B) the failure to take an action set forth in clause (x) or (y) would result in a violation of the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law, the Company Board may at any time prior to the Acceptance Time, (x) effect a Company Change of Board Recommendation with respect to such Superior Company Proposal or (y) terminate this Agreement to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to such Superior Company Proposal, in either case, subject to the requirements of Section 6.3(f) and, in the case of clause (y), provided, that the Company (1) pays, or causes to be paid, to Parent the Company Termination Fee payable pursuant to Section 8.3(a) prior to or concurrently with such termination and (2) immediately following or concurrently with such termination, enters into a definitive acquisition agreement that documents the terms and conditions of such Superior Company Proposal. 

(e) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Section 6.3(a), the Company Board may, at any time prior to the Acceptance Time, and subject to compliance with the requirements of Section 6.3(f), effect a Company Change of Board Recommendation in response to a Company Intervening Event if the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside counsel, that the failure to effect a Company Change of Board Recommendation in response to such Company Intervening Event would result in a violation of the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law. (Page 55)

Question: COR standard (superior offer)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: "Violation" of fiduciary duties
6.3           No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> in response to a <omitted>  Company Competing Proposal <omitted> if the Company Board <omitted> so chooses, cause the Company to effect a Company Change of Recommendation <omitted> if <omitted> the Company Board <omitted> determined in good faith that the Company Competing Proposal remains a Company Superior Proposal <omitted>  6.3      No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> (e)  <omitted> the Company Board <omitted> shall be permitted, <omitted> other than in response to a Company Competing Proposal <omitted>  to make a Company Change of Recommendation if <omitted> the Company Board <omitted> determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such actionwould result in a violation of its legal duties as directors under applicable Law  (Pages 25-26)


6.3           No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> (d)          <omitted> the Company <omitted> may: 
<omitted> 
(iii)            <omitted> in response to a <omitted> Company Competing Proposal <omitted> , cause the Company to effect a Company Change of Recommendation <omitted> if prior to taking such action (A) the Company Board (or any committee thereof) determines in good faith after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel that such Company Competing Proposal is a Company Superior Proposal (taking into account any adjustment to the terms and conditions of the Merger proposed by Parent in response to such Company Competing Proposal) <omitted> ; and   
<omitted>  
(e)           <omitted> the Company Board (or a committee thereof) shall be permitted <omitted> , other than in response to a Company Competing Proposal (which is addressed in Section 6.3(d) (iii)), to make a Company Change of Recommendation if, <omitted> , (i) the Company Board (or a committee thereof) determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such actionwould result in a violation of its legal duties as directors under applicable Law,  (Pages 25-26)

Question: COR standard (superior offer)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: "Violation" of fiduciary duties
6.3 No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> (b) <omitted> Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that, prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that it has received a Company Superior Proposal that was not solicited, initiated, knowingly encouraged or knowingly facilitated or otherwise procured in violation of this Section 6.3(a) (other than any violation that is immaterial in scope and effect), the Company Board may effect a Company Recommendation Change or terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(g) if (A) the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action would result in a violation of fiduciary duties under applicable Law,  (Page 49)


6.3 No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> (b)          Except as permitted by this Section 6.3(b) or Section 6.3(d), neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall (i) withdraw, qualify or modify, or propose publicly to withdraw, qualify or modify, or fail to make, in each case in a manner adverse to Parent, the Company Board Recommendation, <omitted> 

(d)          Other than in connection with a Company Alternative Transaction or a Company Superior Proposal (which shall be subject to Section 6.3(b) and shall not be subject to this Section 6.3(d)), prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company Board may, in response to a Company Intervening Event, take any action prohibited by clauses (i) or (iii) of Section 6.3(b), only if (i) the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action would result in a violation of fiduciary duties under applicable Law,  (Page 50)

Question: COR standard (superior offer)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: "Violation" of fiduciary duties
Section 7.3 No Solicitation; Company Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> (c)            Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, in circumstances not involving a Company Acquisition Proposal, subject to compliance with Section 7.3(e), at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval the Company Board may make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change if, and only if, after the date of this Agreement, the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with Company’s outside counsel) that (i) a Company Intervening Event has occurred or arisen and (ii) the failure to do so would result in a violation of duties under applicable Law.   (d)            Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, subject to compliance with Section 7.3(e), at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company Board may make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change in circumstances involving a Company Acquisition Proposal and in the event that the Company Board determines such Company Acquisition Proposal to be a Company Superior Proposal, in accordance with this Section 7.3, terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.1(d)(iii) (a “Company Superior Proposal Termination”), if and only if (i) Company receives an unsolicited, written Company Acquisition Proposal that the Company Board believes in good faith to be bona fide and that is not


withdrawn, (ii) such Company Acquisition Proposal was not the result of a violation of Section 7.3(a), (iii) the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with Company’s outside counsel and financial advisor) that such Company Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Company Superior Proposal, and (iv) the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with Company’s outside counsel) that the failure to do so would result in a violation of duties under applicable Law. (Pages 47-48)

Question: COR standard (superior offer)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: "Violation" of fiduciary duties
Section 8.4 No Solicitation by the Company; Company Acquisition Proposals. 
<omitted> 
(e) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, at any time prior to the receipt of the Parent Shareholder Approval, (i) the Conflicts Committee and the Company Board may make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change or terminate this Agreement in accordance with Section 10.1(d)(iii) (including payment in full of the Company Termination Fee) in order to substantially concurrently enter into a Company Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal if (i) the Company receives a written Acquisition Proposal that the Conflicts Committee and the Company Board believe in good faith to be bona fide, (ii) such Acquisition Proposal was not the result of a violation of Section 8.4(a), (iii) the Conflicts Committee and the Company Board determine in good faith (after consultation with their respective outside legal and financial advisors) that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal, after taking into account all of the adjustments that have been offered (and not withdrawn) by Parent pursuant to Section 8.4(f)(i), and (D) the Conflicts Committee and the Company Board determine in good faith (after consultation with the their respective outside legal advisors), that the failure to make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change would result in a violation of duties under applicable Law; and (ii) in circumstances not involving an Acquisition Proposal, the Conflicts Committee and the Company Board may make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change if, and only if, after the date of this Agreement, the Conflicts Committee and the Company Board determine in good faith (after consultation with their respective outside legal advisors) that (A) a Company Intervening Event has occurred or arisen, and (B) the failure to do so would result in a violation of duties under applicable Law.  (Page 112)

Question: COR standard (superior offer)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: "Violation" of fiduciary duties
Section 6.03. No Solicitation. <omitted>
(b)    Exceptions. Notwithstanding Section 6.03(a), at any time prior to the adoption of this Agreement by the Company’s stockholders: <omitted>
(ii)    Subject to compliance with Section 6.03(d), the Company Board may make an Adverse Recommendation Change (A) following receipt of a Superior Proposal that did not result from a material breach of this Section 6.03 or (B) in response to material events, changes, occurrences, effects or developments arising after the date hereof that were not known by the Company Board as of the date of this Agreement (other than the existence of any Acquisition Proposal) (any such material event, change, occurrence, effect or development, an “Intervening Event”); in each case referred to in the foregoing clauses (i) and (ii) only if the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such actionwould result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under Delaware Law.  (Page 57)

Question: COR standard (superior offer)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: "Violation" of fiduciary duties
6.3          Stockholder Approvals.  <omitted> However, subject to Section 8.1 and Section 8.2, if the Board of Directors of Webster or Sterling, after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and, with respect to financial matters, its financial advisors, determines in good faith that it would more likely than not result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable law to make or continue to make the Webster Board Recommendation or the Sterling Board Recommendation, as applicable, such Board of Directors may, in the case of Webster, prior to the receipt of the Requisite Webster Vote, and in the case of Sterling, prior to the receipt of the Requisite Sterling Vote, submit this Agreement to its stockholders without recommendation (although the resolutions approving this Agreement as of the date hereof may not be rescinded or amended), in which event such Board of Directors may communicate the basis for its lack of a recommendation to its stockholders in the Joint Proxy Statement or an appropriate amendment or supplement thereto to the extent required by law; (Page 32)

Question: COR standard (superior offer)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: More likely than not violate fiduciary duties
SECTION 5.02. 
Solicitation; Change in Recommendation
. 
<omitted>
Notwithstanding the foregoing limitations but subject to the Company’s compliance with Section 5.02(e) or Section 5.02(f), as applicable, prior to obtaining the Stockholder Approval, but not after, the Board of Directors of the Company or any committee thereof may (I) make an Adverse Recommendation Change or (II) cause the Company to enter into a Company Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Takeover Proposal that did not result from any material breach of this Section 5.02 and terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.01(d)(ii), in either case if the Board of Directors of the Company or any committee thereof has determined in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that (x) in the case of clause (I), the Adverse Recommendation Change is not made in response to a Takeover Proposal and is made in response to an Intervening Event, and failure to take such action would nevertheless more likely than not result in a violation of the Board of Directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law and (y) in the case of (A) clause (I) where such Adverse Recommendation Change is made in response to a Takeover Proposal or (B) clause (II), such Takeover Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal.  (Page 44)

Question: COR standard (superior offer)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: More likely than not violate fiduciary duties
(f) Exception to Change in Recommendation Provision (Superior Proposal). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in Section 6.2(e), following receipt of a written Acquisition Proposal by the Company after the date of this Agreement that did not result from a breach of this Section 6.2 and that the Company’s board of directors determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors, constitutes a Superior Proposal, the Company’s board of directors may, at any time prior to the time the Requisite Company Vote is obtained, (x) make a Change in Recommendation with respect to such Superior Proposal in accordance with Section 6.2(f) (ii) and/or (y) authorize, resolve, agree or propose publicly to take any such action, if all of the following conditions are met: <omitted> (ii) the Company’s board of directors shall have determined, in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that, in light of such Superior Proposal and taking into account any revised terms proposed by Parent, such Superior Proposal continues to constitute a Superior Proposal and that the failure to make such Change in Recommendation would nevertheless more likely than not result in a violation of the directors’ duties under applicable Law. <omitted> (g) Exception to Change in Recommendation (Intervening Event). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in Section 6.2(e), upon the occurrence of any Intervening Event, the Company’s board of directors may, at any time prior to the time the Requisite Company Vote is obtained, make a Change in Recommendation if all of the following conditions are met: <omitted> (ii) the Company’s board of directors shall have determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that in light of such Intervening Event and taking into account any revised terms proposed by Parent, the failure to make a Change in Recommendation would nevertheless more likely than not result in a violation of the directors’ duties under applicable Law.  (Page 56)

Question: COR standard (superior offer)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: More likely than not violate fiduciary duties
Section 5.4    Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> (d)    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Section 5.4, following receipt of a written Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a breach of this Section 5.4, and that the Company Board (acting upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors, constitutes a Superior Proposal, the Company Board and the Special Committee may at any time prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, but not after, make an Adverse Recommendation Change or terminate this Agreement to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal in accordance with Section 7.1(c)(ii), or authorize, resolve, agree or propose publicly to take any such action, if all of the following conditions are met: <omitted> (ii)    the Company Board (acting upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) shall have determined, in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that, in light of such Superior Proposal and taking into account any revised terms proposed by Parent, such Superior Proposal continues to constitute a Superior Proposal and that the failure to make such Adverse Recommendation Change or to so terminate this Agreement in accordance with Section 7.1(c)(ii), as applicable, would nevertheless more likely than not result in a violation of the Company Board’s fiduciary duties under applicable Law.  (Page 44)


Section 5.4    Acquisition Proposals. <omitted>
(e)    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Section 5.4, at any time prior to (but not after) obtaining the company Stockholder Approval, upon the occurrence of any Intervening Event, the Company Board may make an Adverse Recommendation Change if all of the following conditions are met: <omitted>

(ii)    the Company Board (acting upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) shall have determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that in light of such Intervening Event and taking into account any revised terms 

    37


proposed by Parent, the failure to make an Adverse Recommendation Change would nevertheless more likely than not result in a violation of the Company Board’s fiduciary duties under applicable Law.  (Pages 44-45)

Question: COR standard (superior offer)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: More likely than not violate fiduciary duties
6.3 No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> (b) <omitted> Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that, prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that it has received a Company Superior Proposal that was not solicited, initiated, knowingly encouraged or knowingly facilitated or otherwise procured in violation of this Section 6.3(a) (other than any violation that is immaterial in scope and effect), the Company Board may effect a Company Recommendation Change or terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(g) if (A) the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action would nevertheless more likely than not result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable Law,  (Page 49)


6.3 No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> (b)          Except as permitted by this Section 6.3(b) or Section 6.3(d), neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall (i) withdraw, qualify or modify, or propose publicly to withdraw, qualify or modify, or fail to make, in each case in a manner adverse to Parent, the Company Board Recommendation, <omitted> 

(d)          Other than in connection with a Company Alternative Transaction or a Company Superior Proposal (which shall be subject to Section 6.3(b) and shall not be subject to this Section 6.3(d)), prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company Board may, in response to a Company Intervening Event, take any action prohibited by clauses (i) or (iii) of Section 6.3(b), only if (i) the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action would nevertheless more likely than not result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable Law,  (Page 50)

Question: COR standard (superior offer)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: More likely than not violate fiduciary duties
Section 5.3            Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> (d)           Notwithstanding anything in this Section 5.3 or Section 5.4 to the contrary, at any time prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company Board of Directors may (i) make a Change of Recommendation in response to an Intervening Event, or (ii) following receipt of a bona fide written Competing Proposal, which the Company Board of Directors determines in good faith after consultation with the Company’s outside legal and financial advisors is a Superior Proposal, (A) make a Change of Recommendation or (B) if such Competing Proposal did not result from a breach of Section 5.3(a), terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(g) in order to enter into a definitive agreement providing for such Superior Proposal, in each case with respect to clauses (i) and (ii), if and only if the Company Board of Directors has determined in good faith after consultation with the Company’s outside legal counsel that the failure to take such action would nevertheless more likely than not result in a violation of the duties of the members of the Company Board of Directors under applicable Law and the Company complies with Section 5.3(e).  (Page 27)

Question: COR standard (superior offer)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: More likely than not violate fiduciary duties