Sansaboo/maud huggingface dataset:
4.3. No Solicitation. <omitted> 
7.1.Termination. This Agreement may be terminated, and the Merger and the other Transactions may be abandoned, at any time prior to the Effective Time, as follows (with any termination by Parent also being an effective termination by Merger Sub): <omitted> 
(h) by the Company, at any time prior to the receipt of the Company Required Vote, in order to accept a Superior Offer and enter into a binding written definitive acquisition agreement providing for the consummation of a transaction constituting a Superior Offer (a “Specified Agreement”) if (i) the Company has complied with the requirements of Section 4.3 and Section 5.1(b)(i) with respect to such Superior Offer (other than any non-compliance that was both immaterial and unintentional); (ii) the Company Board (or any committee thereof), as permitted by Section 5.1(b), has authorized the Company to enter into a Specified Agreement to consummate the Superior Offer, (iii) prior to or substantially concurrently with the termination of this Agreement the Company pays the Company Termination Fee due to Parent in accordance with Section 7.3(b) and (iv) substantially concurrently with such termination, the Company enters into a Specified Agreement to consummate such Superior Offer; or (Page 64)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 5.10    Acquisition Proposals. (a)    The Company will immediately cease and cause to be terminated any activities, discussions or negotiations with any Persons other than Nicolet  with  respect  to  any  Acquisition  Proposal  and  will  use  its reasonable  best  efforts  to  enforce  any  confidentiality  or  similar agreement  relating  to  an Acquisition  Proposal. <omitted>
(b)    <omitted> provided that, in the event the Company receives an unsolicited bona fide Acquisition Proposal, from a Person other than Nicolet, after the execution of this Agreement and prior to the receipt of the Company Shareholder Approval, and the Company Board concludes in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisor and outside counsel, that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal or could reasonably be likely to result in a Superior Proposal and, after considering the advice of outside counsel, that failure to take such actions could be reasonably likely to result in a violation of the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable law, the Company may: (i) furnish information with respect to it to such Person making such Acquisition Proposal pursuant to a customary confidentiality agreement (subject to the requirement that any such information not previously provided to Nicolet shall be promptly furnished to Nicolet); (ii) participate in discussions or negotiations regarding such Acquisition Proposal; and (iii) terminate this Agreement in order to concurrently enter into an agreement with respect to such Acquisition Proposal; provided, however, that the Company may not terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 5.10 unless and until (x) five (5) Business Days have elapsed following the delivery to Nicolet of a written notice of such determination by the Company Board and, during such five (5) Business-Day period, the parties cooperate with one another with the intent of enabling the parties to engage in good faith negotiations so that the Contemplated Transactions may be effected, and (y) at the end of such five (5) Business-Day period, the Company Board continues, in good faith and after consultation with outside legal counsel and financial advisors, to believe that a Superior Proposal continues to exist.  (Page 41)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Answer: Any breach of no-shop
Section 6.5 Non-Solicitation; Competing Proposals. <omitted> (d) <omitted> Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, at any time prior to receipt of the Requisite Stockholder Approval, the board of directors of the Company may <omitted> (B) if the Company has received a bona fide, unsolicited Competing Proposal which did not result from a material breach of this Section 6.5 and that is not withdrawn, and the board of directors of the Company has determined in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors) that such Competing Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal, make an Adverse Recommendation Change or terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(c)(ii) (including making payment of the Termination Fee) and substantially concurrently enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Competing Proposal that constitutes a Superior Proposal, if and only if, the board of directors of the Company has determined in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors) that the failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law and the Company has complied in all material respects with this Section 6.5 with respect to such Competing Proposal and the Person making   43


such Competing Proposal; 
<omitted> 
Section 8.1 Termination. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after the Requisite Stockholder Approval is obtained (except as otherwise expressly noted), as follows: <omitted> (c) by the Company, if: 
<omitted> 
(ii) prior to receipt of the Requisite Stockholder Approval, the board of directors of the Company shall have authorized the Company to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal in accordance with Section 6.5(d) (after compliance in all material respects with the terms of Section 6.5); provided, that (i) substantially concurrently with such termination, the Company enters into the Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal and (ii) prior to or substantially concurrently with such termination, the Company pays (or causes to be paid) the Termination Fee to (or at the direction of) Parent; or  (Page 70)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 5.2    No Solicitation.(a)    No Solicitation or Negotiation. <omitted> the Company and its Subsidiaries shall, and the Company and its Subsidiaries shall cause their respective directors, officers, employees, Affiliates, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants and other advisors or representatives (collectively, “Representatives”) to, (i) immediately cease and terminate any solicitation, encouragement <omitted> discussions or negotiations with any Persons that may be ongoing with respect to any inquiry, proposal or Acquisition Proposal <omitted> 
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, but subject to Sections 5.2(e) and (f), at any time prior to obtaining the Company Shareholder Approval, but not after, so long as none of the Company, its Subsidiaries or their Representatives have breached in any material respect this Section 5.2, the Company’s Board of Directors (or a committee thereof) may, if the Company’s Board of Directors (or a committee thereof) determines in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisor and outside counsel) that failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, (x) effect a Recommendation Withdrawal in response to an Acquisition Proposal made after the date hereof that did not result from a breach of this Section 5.2 and that the Company’s Board of Directors (or a committee thereof) determines in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisor and outside counsel) is a Superior Proposal (giving effect to all of the binding written adjustments, if any, offered by Parent pursuant to Section 5.2(f) or otherwise), (y) subject to prior or concurrent payment of the Termination Fee, terminate this Agreement under Section 7.1(d)(ii) to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement if the Company’s Board of Directors (or a committee thereof) determines in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisor and outside counsel) that the Acquisition Proposal continues to constitute a Superior Proposal and/or (z) effect a Recommendation Withdrawal in response to an Intervening Event. (Page 43)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 5.3. No Solicitation by the Company.
<omitted>

Section 8.1. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Mergers and the other Transactions may be abandoned at any time before the Closing, as follows (with any termination by Parent also being an effective termination by Merger Sub I and Merger Sub II):
<omitted>

(h) by the Company in order to effect a Change of Recommendation and substantially concurrently enter into a definitive agreement providing for a Superior Proposal; provided that (i) the Company has complied in all material respects with the terms of Section 5.3 and (ii) substantially concurrently with or prior to (and as a condition to) the termination of this Agreement, the Company pays to Parent the Termination Fee.  (Page 85)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
7.3 Acquisition Proposals; Change of Recommendation. <omitted> (d) No Change of Recommendation. <omitted>  

(ii) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Section 7.3, prior to the time the Requisite Company Vote is obtained, the Company Board may (A) effect a Change of Recommendation if (x)(1) a written Acquisition Proposal that the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) is bona fide and that did not arise from or in connection with a breach of the obligations set forth in this Section 7.3 is received by the Company after the date of this Agreement and is not withdrawn prior to the Change of Recommendation, and the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and a financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation, that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal or (2) an Intervening Event has occurred, and (y) the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and a financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation, that failure to effect a Change of Recommendation would reasonably be likely to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law or (B) take action to terminate this Agreement pursuant to, and in accordance with, Section 9.3(b) to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a written Acquisition Proposal that the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) is bona fide and that did not arise from or in connection with a breach of the obligations set forth in this Section 7.3 and that the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and a financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation, that (1) such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal and (2) failure to effect a Change of Recommendation would reasonably be likely to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law; (Page 72)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 6.3 No Solicitation. <omitted> Section 7.1 Company Board Recommendation. <omitted> (b) <omitted> (i) if the Company has received a bona fide written Acquisition Proposal (which Acquisition Proposal was made after the date of this Agreement and did not arise out of a material breach of Section 6.3(a)) <omitted> the Company may terminate this Agreement to enter into a Specified Agreement with respect to such Superior Offer <omitted> Section 9.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated <omitted> (d) by the Company, at any time prior to the Offer Acceptance Time: (i) if, (A) the Company Board has determined that an Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Offer, (B) the Company has complied with its obligations set forth in Section 7.1(b)(i), (C) the Company, substantially concurrently with such termination, pays to Parent the Termination Fee and (D) substantially concurrently with such termination, the Company enters into a definitive Specified Agreement in respect of such Superior Offer;  (Page 54)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 8.3.Termination by the Company. This Agreement may be terminated, and the Offer and the Merger may be abandoned, at any time prior to the Acceptance Time, by the Company if: <omitted> (b)    The Company Board or any committee thereof effects a Change of Board Recommendation in respect of a Superior Proposal in accordance with Section 6.3(e)(i); provided, that, (i) such Superior Proposal, or any Acquisition Proposal that was a precursor thereto, shall not have resulted from a material breach of Section 6.3, (ii) after the Company and Company Board satisfy all of the requirements set forth in Section 6.3(e)(i), the Company Board authorizes the Company to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement in respect of such Superior Proposal and (iii) the Company shall pay the Termination Fee due pursuant, and in accordance with, to Section 8.5(b), and shall have entered into such Alternative Acquisition Agreement, concurrently with the termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.3(b). (Page 30)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 5.2. Go-Shop; Acquisition Proposals. 
<omitted> 
(c) 
<omitted> 
Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, prior to the time the Stockholder Approval is obtained, the Company Board may (x) effect a Change of Recommendation contemplated by clauses (1) or (2) of the definition thereof if, upon the occurrence of an Intervening Event, the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that failure to do so would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary obligations under applicable Law or (y) if the Company receives, directly or indirectly through one or more of its Representatives, a written, bona fide Acquisition Proposal that the Company Board concludes in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel, constitutes a Superior Proposal and such Acquisition Proposal did not result from a breach of this Section 5.2, effect a Change of Recommendation and/or terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.3(a) in order to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement providing for such Superior Proposal, and, in the case of either clause (x) or (y): 
<omitted> 
Section 7.3. Termination by the Company. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned by the Company: (a) at any time prior to the time the Stockholder Approval is obtained, in order to concurrently enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement providing for a Superior Proposal in accordance with, and subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of, Section 5.2(c); provided, that prior to or concurrently with, and as a condition to, such termination, the Company pays to Parent the Company Termination Fee due under Section 7.5(b);  (Page 70)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 5.4 Acquisition Proposals. 
<omitted> 
(d) <omitted> following receipt of a <omitted> Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a breach of this Section 5.4, <omitted> the Company Board may <omitted> terminate this Agreement to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal in accordance with Section 7.1(c)(ii), 
<omitted> 
Section 7.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after, the Company Stockholder Approval has been obtained (with any termination by Parent also being an effective termination by Merger Sub): 
<omitted> 
(c) by the Company: 
<omitted> 
(ii) at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, if (A) the Company Board authorizes the Company, to the extent permitted by and subject to complying with the terms of Section 5.4(d), to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal, (B) concurrently with the termination of this Agreement, the Company, subject to complying with the terms of Section 5.4(d), enters into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement providing for a Superior Proposal and (C) prior to or concurrently with such termination, the Company pays to Parent in immediately available funds the Company-Paid Termination Fee; or  (Page 67)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Answer: Any breach of no-shop
Section 6.3 No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> Section 8.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger and the other Transactions may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether (except as expressly set forth below) before or after the Company Stockholder Approval or the Parent Stockholder Approval has been obtained: <omitted> (e) by the Company, in order to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to a Company Superior Proposal; provided, however, that (i) the Company shall not have Willfully and Materially Breached any of its obligations under Section 6.3  (Page 105)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
6.2 Solicitation of Transactions. <omitted> (b) No-Shop Period. <omitted> 

(ii)           Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, if at any time following the date hereof and prior to the time the Requisite Company Vote is obtained, in response to a bona fide written Acquisition Proposal that was not solicited in breach of Section 6.2(b)(i) (except to the extent solicited in accordance with Section 6.2(a)) that the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with outside counsel and its financial advisor) is, or could reasonably be expected to lead to, a Superior Proposal, the Company may, subject to compliance with Section 6.2, (x) furnish information regarding the Company and the Company Subsidiaries to the person making such Acquisition Proposal (and its Representatives) pursuant to an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement; provided, that all such information has previously been provided to Parent or is provided to Parent prior to or promptly following the time it is provided to such person, and (y) participate in discussions or negotiations with the person making such Acquisition Proposal (and its Representatives) regarding such Acquisition Proposal, but only if and to the extent that in connection with the foregoing clauses (x) and (y), the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law <omitted> 

8.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time: <omitted> 

(g)          By the Company prior to the time the Requisite Company Vote is obtained in order to enter into an Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal in accordance with Section 6.2; provided, that such termination shall only be effective if prior to or concurrently therewith the Company pays the Company Termination Fee as directed by Parent.  (Page 41)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
SECTION 7.03      No Solicitation. <omitted> ( e )         Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval but subject to compliance with Section 7.03(a), if in response to an unsolicited Acquisition Proposal made after the date of this Agreement that has not been withdrawn and that did not result from a breach of this Section 7.03, the Company Board determines (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors) that such Acquisition Proposal is a Superior Proposal and determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel) that its failure to take such action would, or would be reasonably likely to, violate its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, then (i) the Company Board may make an Adverse Recommendation Change and/or (ii) the Company may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.01(d)(ii) in order to enter into an Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal; provided, however, that the Company shall not terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.01(d)(ii) unless the Company (A) prior to, or concurrently with, such termination, pays, or causes to be paid, to Parent (or its designee) the Company Termination Fee and (B) concurrently with such termination, enters into a definitive agreement that documents the terms and conditions of such Superior Proposal. (Page 27)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 5.2 No Solicitation; Recommendations. <omitted> (ii) “Superior Proposal” means, with respect to Parent or the Company, any bona fide written Acquisition Proposal that is not solicited after the date of this Agreement in violation of Section 5.2(a) that the Parent Board or the Company Board (as applicable) determines in good faith (after consultation with outside counsel and its financial advisor), taking into account all legal, financial, regulatory and other aspects of the proposal, including the terms of any financing or financing contingencies and the likely timing of closing, and the Person making the proposal, (A) is more favorable to the stockholders of such Party from a financial point of view than the Transactions (including any adjustment to the terms and conditions proposed by the other Party in response to such proposal) and (B) would reasonably be expected to be completed on the terms proposed; provided, that, for purposes of this definition of “Superior Proposal,” references in the term “Acquisition Proposal” to “20% or more” shall be deemed to be references to “50% or more” <omitted> Section 7.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Mergers may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after the Parent Stockholder Approval or the Company Stockholder Approval has been obtained (with any termination byParent or the Company also being an effective termination by the other Parent Parties or the other Company Parties, respectively): <omitted> (e) by the Company, prior to, but not after, the time the Company Stockholder Approval is obtained, in order to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal; provided, however, that the Company shall have contemporaneously with such termination tendered payment to Parent of the Company Termination Fee pursuant to Section 7.3.  (Page 102)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer