Sansaboo/maud huggingface dataset:
Section 6.02    No Solicitation
<omitted>
(b)    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, if, at any time prior to obtaining the Stockholder Approval, the Company receives an Acquisition Proposal from a Third Party that did not result from a material breach of this Section 6.02, (i) the Company and its Representatives may contact such Third Party making the Acquisition Proposal solely to clarify the terms and conditions thereof or to request that any Acquisition Proposal made orally be made in writing and (ii) if the Company Board or any committee thereof determines, in good faith after consultation with a Company Financial Advisor and outside legal counsel, that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to result in, a Superior Proposal, then the Company and its Representatives may (A) furnish information and data with respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries to the Third Party making such Acquisition Proposal and afford such Third Party access to the businesses, properties, assets and personnel of the Company and its Subsidiaries and (B) enter into, maintain and participate in discussions or negotiations with the Third Party making such Acquisition Proposal regarding such Acquisition Proposal or otherwise cooperate with or assist or participate in, or knowingly facilitate, any such discussions or negotiations;  (Page 64)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
Section 5.3. No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> (b) Notwithstanding the limitations set forth in Section 5.3(a), if the Company receives, prior to the Company Stockholder Approval being obtained, an unsolicited, bona fide, written Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a breach of this Section 5.3, which the Company Board of Directors determines in good faith after consultation with the Company’s outside legal counsel and financial advisors (i) constitutes a Superior Proposal or (ii) would reasonably be expected to result in a Superior Proposal and, in each case, that the failure to take such action would be reasonably likely to violate the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law, then in either event the Company may take the following actions: (x) furnish nonpublic information with respect to the Company to the person making such Acquisition Proposal and its Representatives, if, and only if, prior to so furnishing such information, the Company receives from such person an executed Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement and the Company also provides Parent, prior to or substantially concurrently with the time such information is provided or made available to such person, any nonpublic information furnished to such other person that was not previously furnished to Parent, and (y) engage in discussions or negotiations with such person with respect to such Acquisition Proposal.  (Page 61)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
Section 6.02          Company No Solicitation. <omitted> (b)              Company Superior Proposal.  Notwithstanding Section 6.02(a), prior to the receipt of the Requisite Company Vote, the Company directly or indirectly through any Representative, may, subject to Section 6.02(c):  (i) participate in negotiations or discussions with any Third Party that has made (and not withdrawn) a bona fide Company Takeover Proposal that did not arise from a breach of the obligations set forth in Section 6.02(a) in writing that the Company Board believes in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and the Company Financial Advisor constitutes or would reasonably be expected to lead to a Company Superior Proposal; (ii) thereafter furnish to such Third Party non-public information relating to the Company or its Subsidiaries pursuant to an executed confidentiality agreement that constitutes an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement (a copy of which confidentiality agreement shall be promptly (in all events within twenty-four (24) hours) provided for informational purposes to Parent); provided that such non-public information relating to the Company or its Subsidiaries was previously made available to, or is concurrently made available to, Parent;  (Page 78)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
SECTION 5.02.No Solicitation.  <omitted> Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time prior to receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, if the Company Board receives a written bona fide Acquisition Proposal after the date hereof that was not solicited by the Company or its Representatives and did not otherwise result from a breach or deemed breach of this Section 5.02(a) and that (I) the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel and a financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation) constitutes or would reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal, and (II) the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that failure to take the actions specified in the following clauses (x) and/or (y) of this sentence with respect to such Acquisition Proposal would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties to the stockholders of the Company under Delaware Law, then subject to providing prior written notice (before taking the actions in the following clauses (x) or (y) hereof) of its decision to take such action to Parent as promptly as practicable after such determination was reached (and in any event, no later than 24 hours thereafter) and compliance with Section 5.02(c), the Company Board may (x) furnish information with respect to the Company to the Person making such Acquisition Proposal and its Representatives pursuant to a confidentiality agreement not materially less restrictive in the aggregate of the other party than the Confidentiality Agreement provided that, a Person who within the last twelve months that has entered into a confidentiality agreement with the Company relating to a purchase of, or business combination with, the Company shall not be required to enter into a new or revised confidentiality agreement if such confidentiality agreement remains in effect with a term of at least twelve (12) months and does not prohibit the Company from complying with this Section 5.02, and such existing confidentiality agreement shall be deemed to be an acceptable confidentiality agreement hereunder (provided, that any information provided to such Person shall have previously been made available to Parent or shall be made available to Parent prior to or at the same time as it is provided to such Person, and provided further that such confidentiality agreement shall not prohibit or purport to prohibit the Company in any way from complying with this Section 5.02 or this Agreement or include any provision calling for an exclusive right to negotiate with the Company, the Company Board or their Representatives) and (y) participate in discussions or negotiations with such Person and its Representatives regarding any Acquisition Proposal  (Page 52)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
7.2.         Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> (b)             Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 7.2(a), if Bryn Mawr or any of its Representatives receives an unsolicited, bona fide written Acquisition Proposal by any Person at any time prior to the Bryn Mawr Shareholder Approval that did not result from or arise in connection with a breach of Section 7.2(a), Bryn Mawr and its Representatives may, prior to (but not after) the Bryn Mawr Meeting, take the following actions if the board of directors of Bryn Mawr (or any committee thereof) has (i) determined, in its good faith judgment (after consultation with Bryn Mawr’s financial advisors and outside legal counsel), that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal and that the failure to take such actions would reasonably likely cause it to violate its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, and (ii) obtained from such Person an executed confidentiality agreement containing terms at least as restrictive with respect to such Person as the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement is in each provision with respect to WSFS (and such confidentiality agreement shall not provide such Person with any exclusive right to negotiate with Bryn Mawr): (A) furnish information to (but only if Bryn Mawr shall have provided such information to WSFS prior to furnishing it to any such Person), and (B) enter into discussions and negotiations with, such Person with respect to such unsolicited, bona fide written Acquisition Proposal.  (Page 52)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
5.3 No Solicitation. <omitted>

(b) Superior Proposals. Notwithstanding anything to contrary set forth in this Section 5.3, from December 11, 2020 until the Offer Acceptance Time, the Company Parties and the Company Board (or a committee thereof) may, directly or indirectly through one or more of their Representatives (including the Advisor), participate or engage in discussions or negotiations with, furnish any non-public information relating to the Company Group to, or afford access to the business, properties, assets, books, records or other non-public information, or to any personnel, of the Company Group pursuant to an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement to any Person or its Representatives that has made or delivered to the Company Parties an Acquisition Proposal after December 11, 2020, and otherwise facilitate such Acquisition Proposal or assist such Person (and its Representatives and financing sources) with such Acquisition Proposal (in each case, if requested by such Person), in each case with respect to an Acquisition Proposal that did not result from any material breach of Section 5.3(a); provided, however, that the Company Board (or a committee thereof) has determined in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel) that such Acquisition Proposal either constitutes a Superior Proposal or is reasonably likely to lead to a Superior Proposal, and the Company Board (or a committee thereof) has determined in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel) that the failure to take the actions contemplated by this Section 5.3(b) would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties pursuant to applicable law; and provided further, however, that the Company will promptly (and in any event within 24 hours) make available to the Parent Entities any non-public information concerning the Company Group that is provided to any such Person or its Representatives that was not previously made available to the Parent Entities.  (Page 68)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
4.1.9 Acquisition Proposal. <omitted> except that, in the event AB receives an unsolicited bona fide Acquisition Proposal and the board of directors of AB determines prior to approval of this Agreement and the Merger by AB’s shareholders at the AB Meeting, in good faith and after consultation with independent legal counsel, that (a) such Acquisition Proposal constitutes or is reasonably expected to result in a Superior Proposal, and (b) fiduciary duties applicable to it require it to engage in negotiations with, provide confidential information or data to, or have any discussions with a Person in connection with such Acquisition Proposal, AB may do so to the extent the board of directors of AB determines it is required by its fiduciary duties.  (Page 39)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
6.3           No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> (d)          Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the Company, directly or indirectly through one or more of its Representatives, may: 
<omitted> 
(ii)              prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, engage in the activities prohibited by Sections 6.3(b)(ii) and 6.3(b) (iii) with any Person if (A) the Company receives a written, bona fide Company Competing Proposal from such Person that was not solicited at any time following the execution of this Agreement and (B) such Company Competing Proposal did not arise from a material breach of the obligations set forth in this Section 6.3; provided, however, that (1) no non-public information that is prohibited from being furnished pursuant to Section 6.3(b) may be furnished until the Company receives an executed confidentiality agreement from such Person containing limitations on the use and disclosure of nonpublic information furnished to such Person by or on behalf of the Company that are no less favorable to the Company in the aggregate than the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement, as determined by the Company Board (or any committee thereof) in good faith after consultation with its outside legal counsel; provided, further, that such confidentiality agreement does not contain provisions that prohibit the Company from complying with the provisions of this Section 6.3, and (2) prior to taking any such actions, the Company Board (or any committee thereof) determines in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that such Company Competing Proposal is, or could reasonably be expected to lead to, a Company Superior Proposal;  (Page 25)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
7.05 Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this Section 7.05 shall prohibit CBTC, prior to the CBTC Meeting and subject to compliance with the other terms of this Section 7.05, from furnishing nonpublic information to, or entering into discussions or negotiations with, any Person that makes an unsolicited, bona fide written Acquisition Proposal with respect to CBTC or any of its Significant Subsidiaries (that did not result from a breach of this Section 7.05), if, and only to the extent that (i) the CBTC Board concludes in good faith, after consultation with and based upon the advice of outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such actions would be reasonably likely to constitute a breach of its fiduciary duties to its shareholders under applicable law, (Page 49)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
Section 5.03 Solicitation; Change of Company Recommendation. <omitted> (b)            Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement but subject to the last sentence of this Section 5.03(b), if, at any time following the execution of this Agreement and prior to the earlier of the Company obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval or the termination of this Agreement (and in no event after the Company obtains the Company Stockholder Approval), (i) the Company has received a bona fide written Competing Proposal from a person after the date of this Agreement that did not result from a breach of Section 5.03(a) (other than an immaterial and unintentional breach), and (ii) the Company Board (or any committee thereof) determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that such Competing Proposal constitutes or would reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal and the failure to take any of the following actions would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary duties under applicable Law, then the Company, the Company Subsidiaries and the Company’s Representatives may, subject to compliance with the applicable provisions of this Section 5.03 with respect to such Competing Proposal (other than immaterial or unintentional failures to comply), (A) furnish information, including with respect to the Company and the Company Subsidiaries, to the person making such Competing Proposal and its Representatives and (B) participate in discussions or negotiations with the person making such Competing Proposal and its Representatives in connection with such Competing Proposal; provided, however, that the Company shall not disclose any material non-public information regarding the Company or the Company Subsidiaries pursuant to the foregoing without first entering into an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement with such person if such person is not already party to an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement with the Company. The Company shall provide Parent and Sub any non- public information that is provided to any such person in connection with such Competing Proposal that was not previously made available (whether prior to or after the execution of this Agreement) to Parent or Sub reasonably promptly following the time it is provided to such person or, with respect to such information conveyed verbally, promptly (and, in any event, within forty-eight (48) hours thereafter).  (Page 24)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
SECTION 7.8. No Solicitation. (a) <omitted> Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, if in response to an unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition Proposal made by a Third Party after the date hereof in circumstances not involving a breach in any material respect of this Section 7.8, the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel and a financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation) that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes, or could reasonably be expected to lead to, a Superior Proposal and, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with the fiduciary duties of the Company Board under applicable Law, then the Company may, at any time prior to the Offer Closing (but in no event after such time), enter into a customary confidentiality agreement (x) containing confidentiality and other terms that are no less favorable to the Company in the aggregate than those contained in the Confidentiality Agreement and (y) that does not prevent the Company from providing any   70


information to Parent in accordance with this Agreement or otherwise comply with its obligation under this Agreement (an “Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement”) with such Third Party making such an Acquisition Proposal and thereafter (1) furnish information and data with respect to the Company and the Company Subsidiaries and afford access to the business, personnel, properties, assets, books or records of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries, in each case, pursuant to such Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement, and (2) enter into, maintain and participate in discussions or negotiations with, the Third Party making such Acquisition Proposal and its Representatives; provided, that the Company will concurrently provide to Parent any information and data concerning the Company or any Company Subsidiary or access provided to such Third Party that was not previously made available to Parent.  (Pages 74-75)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
5.3 No Solicitation.<omitted> (c) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, if at any time on or after the date of this Agreement and prior to the Offer Acceptance Time any Acquired Corporation or any of their Representatives receives an unsolicited bona fide Acquisition Proposal from any Person or group of Persons, (i) the Company and its Representatives may contact such Person or group of Persons solely to clarify the terms and conditions thereof and (ii) if the Board of Directors determines in good faith, after consultation with financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Offer, then the Company and its Representatives may (A) furnish, pursuant to an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement, information (including non-public information) with respect to the Acquired Corporations to the Person or group of Persons who has made such Acquisition Proposal; provided that the Company shall as promptly as practicable (and no later than one business day) provide to Parent any non-public information concerning the Acquired Corporations that is provided to any Person to the extent access to such information was not previously provided to Parent or its Representatives and (B) engage in or otherwise participate in discussions or negotiations with the Person or group of Persons making such Acquisition Proposal. (Page 43)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer