Sansaboo/maud huggingface dataset:
Section 6.03          No Solicitation by the Company. 
<omitted> 
(f)          <omitted> in response to a bona fide Company Acquisition Proposal that has not resulted from a violation of this Section 6.03 <omitted> subject to compliance with this Section 6.03(f), <omitted>  (ii) terminate this Agreement in accordance with Section 9.01(d) 
<omitted> 
Section 9.01          Termination.  This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time (notwithstanding receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval or the Parent Shareholder Approval): 
<omitted> 
(d)          by the Company: 
<omitted> 
(iii)          prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, in order to enter into a definitive agreement providing for a Company Superior Proposal promptly following such termination, provided that the Company (i) shall have complied with all of the terms and conditions set forth in Section 6.03 (No Solicitation), (ii) shall have paid the Company Termination Payment substantially concurrently with or prior to (and as a condition to) such termination in accordance with Section 9.03(a) and (iii) substantially concurrently enters into such definitive agreement with respect to such Company Superior Proposal.  (Page 106)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Any breach of no-shop
Section 5.3 <omitted> (d)           Notwithstanding anything in this Section 5.3 or Section 5.4 to the contrary, at any time prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company Board of Directors may (i) make a Change of Recommendation in response to an Intervening Event, or (ii) following receipt of a bona fide written Competing Proposal, which the Company Board of Directors determines in good faith after consultation with the Company’s outside legal and financial advisors is a Superior Proposal, (A) make a Change of Recommendation or (B) if such Competing Proposal did not result from a breach of Section 5.3(a), terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(g) in order to enter into a definitive agreement providing for such Superior Proposal, in each case with respect to clauses (i) and (ii), if and only if the Company Board of Directors has determined in good faith after consultation with the Company’s outside legal counsel that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with the duties of the members of the Company Board of Directors under applicable Law and the Company complies with Section 5.3(e).
 <omitted> Section 8.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Mergers and the other Transactions may be abandoned (except as otherwise provided below, whether before or after receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, if applicable) as follows: <omitted> (g)           by the Company, prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, pursuant to Section 5.3(d)(ii)(B), in order to enter into a definitive agreement providing for a Superior Proposal, provided that the Company shall have paid the Company Termination Fee pursuant to Section 8.2(b) (iv) simultaneously with or prior to such termination.  (Page 36)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
6.3           Termination by the Company. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned by the Company:   (a)           at any time prior to the time the Company Requisite Vote is obtained, if (i)the Company Board authorizes the Company, subject to complying with the terms of this Agreement (including, for the avoidance of doubt, Section 4.2 hereof), to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal; and (ii)immediately prior to or concurrently with the termination of this Agreement the Company enters into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal; provided, that concurrently with such termination the Company pays the Company Termination Fee pursuant to Section 6.5(b); (Page 30)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Any breach of no-shop, (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Section 6.04. No Solicitation; Other Offers. <omitted> (ii) subject to compliance with ​Section 6.04(d), the Board of Directors may, (A) in response to its receipt of a bona fide unsolicited written Acquisition Proposal which did not result from a breach of this ​Section 6.04 and that the Board of Directors has determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor, constitutes a Superior Proposal, make an Adverse Recommendation Change or terminate this Agreement pursuant to and in accordance with ​Section 10.01(d)(i) in order to enter into a definitive agreement for a Superior Proposal, 

Section 10.01.Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time (notwithstanding any approval of this Agreement by the stockholders of the Company): <omitted> 
(d)            by the Company, if:   (i)            prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, the Board of Directors authorizes the Company to enter into a written agreement concerning a Superior Proposal, subject to compliance with ​Section 6.04, provided that concurrently with such termination, the Company pays to Parent (or its designee) the Termination Fee payable pursuant to ​​Section 11.04 and enters into the Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal; (Page 34)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
SECTION 5.02.          No Solicitation by the Company; Company Board Recommendation. <omitted> Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time prior to obtaining the Company Shareholder Approval, the Company Board may (I) make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change or (II) cause the Company to enter into an Acquisition Agreement constituting or that may reasonably be expected to lead to a Company Takeover Proposal not obtained in violation of this Section 5.02 and terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.01(c)(ii), <omitted> 


SECTION 8.01.          Termination.  This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after receipt of the Company Shareholder Approval: <omitted>  (C) by the Company: <omitted> 

(ii)          prior to receipt of the Company Shareholder Approval, in connection with entering into an Acquisition Agreement in accordance with Section 5.02(c)(ii)(II); provided that prior to or concurrently with such termination the Company pays, or causes to be paid, the Company Termination Fee due under Section 6.06(b) so long as Parent has provided the Company with wire instructions for such payment; or (Page 58)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Any breach of no-shop
Section 5.3 Company Acquisition Proposals. <omitted>

(e) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement (including this Section 5.3), if prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, (i) the Company receives an unsolicited bona fide written Company Acquisition Proposal, (ii) such Company Acquisition Proposal did not result from a breach by the Company of this Section 5.3 and (iii) the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with the Company’s outside legal counsel and outside financial advisors) that such Company Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Company Superior Proposal, then, the Company may make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change and may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(d)(ii) (including payment of the Company Termination Fee) and concurrently enter into a binding definitive agreement to effect such Company Superior Proposal.  (Page 59)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 8.01 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger (and the other transactions contemplated hereby) may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time (notwithstanding if the Company Required Vote has been obtained): <omitted> (d) by the Company, prior to the receipt of the Company Required Vote in accordance with Section 6.06(c) in order to substantially concurrently with such termination enter into a binding definitive written agreement to effect a Superior Proposal that did not arise as a result of a material breach of Section 6.06 so long as the Company pays, or causes to be paid, to Parent the Company Termination Fee prior to or substantially concurrently with, and as a condition to the effectiveness of, such termination;  (Page 57)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 5.10    Acquisition Proposals. (a)    The Company will immediately cease and cause to be terminated any activities, discussions or negotiations with any Persons other than Nicolet  with  respect  to  any  Acquisition  Proposal  and  will  use  its reasonable  best  efforts  to  enforce  any  confidentiality  or  similar agreement  relating  to  an Acquisition  Proposal. <omitted>
(b)    <omitted> provided that, in the event the Company receives an unsolicited bona fide Acquisition Proposal, from a Person other than Nicolet, after the execution of this Agreement and prior to the receipt of the Company Shareholder Approval, and the Company Board concludes in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisor and outside counsel, that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal or could reasonably be likely to result in a Superior Proposal and, after considering the advice of outside counsel, that failure to take such actions could be reasonably likely to result in a violation of the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable law, the Company may: (i) furnish information with respect to it to such Person making such Acquisition Proposal pursuant to a customary confidentiality agreement (subject to the requirement that any such information not previously provided to Nicolet shall be promptly furnished to Nicolet); (ii) participate in discussions or negotiations regarding such Acquisition Proposal; and (iii) terminate this Agreement in order to concurrently enter into an agreement with respect to such Acquisition Proposal; provided, however, that the Company may not terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 5.10 unless and until (x) five (5) Business Days have elapsed following the delivery to Nicolet of a written notice of such determination by the Company Board and, during such five (5) Business-Day period, the parties cooperate with one another with the intent of enabling the parties to engage in good faith negotiations so that the Contemplated Transactions may be effected, and (y) at the end of such five (5) Business-Day period, the Company Board continues, in good faith and after consultation with outside legal counsel and financial advisors, to believe that a Superior Proposal continues to exist.  (Page 41)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Any breach of no-shop
9.3. Termination by the Company. Subject to Section 9.5(a), this Agreement may be terminated and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time by the Company: <omitted> (b) at any time prior to the time the Requisite Company Vote is obtained, in order to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal in compliance with Section 7.2(d); provided, however, that the Company shall have concurrently with such termination paid or caused to be paid to Parent the Termination Fee pursuant to Section 9.5 and the Company shall not have materially breached the obligations set forth in Section 7.2(a) (No Solicitation) in respect of such Acquisition Proposal.  (Page 60)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 6.3. Acquisition Proposals. 

(a) The Company shall not, and shall instruct its Representatives not to: (i) directly or indirectly initiate, solicit, or knowingly encourage or knowingly facilitate (including by way of providing information) any inquiries, proposals or offers, or the making of any submission or announcement of any inquiry, proposal or offer that constitutes or would reasonably be expected to lead to any Acquisition Proposal, (ii) directly or indirectly engage in, enter into or participate in any discussions or negotiations with any Person with respect to any Acquisition Proposal or (iii) provide any non-public information to, or afford access to the business, properties, assets, books or records of the Company to, any Person (other than Parent, Purchaser, or any designees of Parent or Purchaser) in connection with any Acquisition Proposal. The Company shall, and shall cause its directors and officers to, and shall direct its other Representatives to, (x) immediately cease any solicitation, discussions, or negotiations with any Person (other than Parent, Purchaser, or any designees of Parent or Purchaser) with respect to any Acquisition Proposal,
<omitted>
(e) Notwithstanding Section 6.3(d) or any other provision of this Agreement, prior to the Acceptance Time: 

(i) the Company may terminate this Agreement to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement if (A) the Company receives an Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a material breach of Section 6.3(a) and that the Company Board or a committee thereof determines in good faith, after consultation with outside counsel, constitutes a Superior Proposal, (B) the Company has notified Parent in writing that it intends to terminate this Agreement to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement and (C) no earlier than the end of the Notice Period, the Company Board or any committee thereof determines in good faith that the Acquisition Proposal that is subject of the Determination Notice continues to constitute a Superior Proposal and that the failure to terminate this Agreement would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, after consultation with outside counsel and taking into consideration the terms of any proposed amendment or modification to this Agreement that Parent has irrevocably committed to make during the Notice Period;  (Page 47)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
5.3 No Solicitation. <omitted> 

6.1 Company Board Recommendation. <omitted> (b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, at any time prior to the Offer Acceptance Time: (i) if any Acquired Corporation has received a bona fide written Acquisition Proposal from any Person that has not been withdrawn and after consultation with outside legal counsel and financial advisors, the Board of Directors shall have determined, in good faith, that such Acquisition Proposal is a Superior Offer, (x) the Board of Directors may make a Company Adverse Change Recommendation, or (y) the Company may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(e) to enter into a Specified Agreement with respect to such Superior Offer, in each case, if and only if: (A) the Board of Directors determines in good faith, after consultation with the Company’s outside legal counsel and financial advisors, that such action is required by the fiduciary duties of the Board of Directors to the Company’s stockholders under applicable Legal Requirements <omitted> 

8.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated prior to the Effective Time:

(e) by the Company, at any time prior to the Offer Acceptance Time, in order to accept a Superior Offer and substantially concurrently enter into a binding written definitive acquisition agreement providing for the consummation of a transaction which the Board of Directors shall have determined, in good faith, constitutes a Superior Offer (a “Specified Agreement”)

provided that no Acquired Corporation shall be in material breach of Section 5.3 or in willful breach of Section 6.1(b)(i) in relation to such Superior Offer; (Page 55)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 6.3.    Solicitation. <omitted>
Section 9.1.    Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger and the other Transactions may be abandoned, at anytime before the Effective Time, as follows (with any termination by Parent also being an effective termination by Merger Sub): <omitted> (g)    by the Company, prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, in order to enter into a definitive agreement providing for a Superior Proposal; provided that (i) the Company has complied in all material respects with Section 6.3 and (ii) immediately prior to or substantially concurrently with (and as a condition to) the termination of this Agreement, the Company pays to Parent the Termination Fee payable pursuant to Section 9.2(b)(iv); or (Page 75)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 5.4 Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> (b)          (i)            Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors of VEREIT and the Board of Directors of Realty Income shall each be permitted, prior to its respective meeting of stockholders to be held pursuant to Section 5.1, and subject to (A) compliance with the other terms of this Section 5.4 and (B) first entering into a confidentiality agreement having provisions that are no less favorable to such party than those contained in the Confidentiality Agreement (provided that such agreement need not contain any standstill or similar provision prohibiting the making of an Acquisition Proposal), to engage in discussions and negotiations with, or provide any nonpublic information or data to, any Person in response to an unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition Proposal by such Person first made after the date of this Agreement (that did not result from a material breach of this Section 5.4) and which the Board of Directors of VEREIT or the Board of Directors of Realty Income, as applicable, concludes in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel and financial advisors) constitutes or is reasonably likely to result in a Superior Proposal, if and only to the extent that the directors of VEREIT or of Realty Income, as applicable, conclude in good faith (after consultation with their outside legal counsel) that failure to do so would reasonably be expected to result in a breach of their duties to VEREIT or Realty Income, as applicable. VEREIT or Realty Income, as applicable, shall provide the other with a copy of any nonpublic information or data provided to a third party pursuant to the prior sentence prior to or substantially concurrently with furnishing such information to such third party (except to the extent that such nonpublic information or data shall have been previously provided to the other party).  <omitted> Section 7.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective Time, by action taken or authorized by the Board of Directors of the terminating party or parties, whether before or after approval of the Merger by the stockholders of VEREIT or Realty Income: <omitted> (d)               by VEREIT, upon written notice to Realty Income:   (i)                 at any time prior to the receipt of the VEREIT Required Stockholders Vote in order to enter into an Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal in accordance with the express terms and conditions of Section 5.4; provided, however, that this Agreement may not be so terminated unless the payment required by Section 7.2(b)(i) is made in full to Realty Income substantially concurrently with the occurrence of such termination and the entry into such Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal; and  (Page 40)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 5.2    No Solicitation.(a)    No Solicitation or Negotiation. <omitted> the Company and its Subsidiaries shall, and the Company and its Subsidiaries shall cause their respective directors, officers, employees, Affiliates, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants and other advisors or representatives (collectively, “Representatives”) to, (i) immediately cease and terminate any solicitation, encouragement <omitted> discussions or negotiations with any Persons that may be ongoing with respect to any inquiry, proposal or Acquisition Proposal <omitted> 
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, but subject to Sections 5.2(e) and (f), at any time prior to obtaining the Company Shareholder Approval, but not after, so long as none of the Company, its Subsidiaries or their Representatives have breached in any material respect this Section 5.2, the Company’s Board of Directors (or a committee thereof) may, if the Company’s Board of Directors (or a committee thereof) determines in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisor and outside counsel) that failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, (x) effect a Recommendation Withdrawal in response to an Acquisition Proposal made after the date hereof that did not result from a breach of this Section 5.2 and that the Company’s Board of Directors (or a committee thereof) determines in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisor and outside counsel) is a Superior Proposal (giving effect to all of the binding written adjustments, if any, offered by Parent pursuant to Section 5.2(f) or otherwise), (y) subject to prior or concurrent payment of the Termination Fee, terminate this Agreement under Section 7.1(d)(ii) to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement if the Company’s Board of Directors (or a committee thereof) determines in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisor and outside counsel) that the Acquisition Proposal continues to constitute a Superior Proposal and/or (z) effect a Recommendation Withdrawal in response to an Intervening Event. (Page 43)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 6.02 No Solicitation by the Company. (a) From the date of this Agreement until the earlier of the First Effective Time and the termination of this Agreement, except as otherwise set forth in this Section 6.02, the Company shall not, and shall cause its Subsidiaries and its and its Subsidiaries’ respective directors and officers to not, and shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause its and its Subsidiaries’ other respective Representatives to not, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate, knowingly facilitate or knowingly encourage (including by way of furnishing information) any inquiries regarding, or the making or submission of any Company Acquisition Proposal, <omitted> Section 10.01 Termination.  This  Agreement  may  be  terminated  and  the  Mergers  and  the  other transactions  contemplated  hereby may  be abandoned at any time prior to the First Effective Time (notwithstanding receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval or the Parent Shareholder Approval): <omitted> (d)by the Company: <omitted> (iii) prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, in order to enter into a definitive agreement providing for a Company Superior Proposal promptly following such termination in accordance with, and subject to the terms and conditions of, Section 6.02. (Page 102)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Any breach of no-shop