Sansaboo/maud huggingface dataset:
5.3 No Solicitation.
<omitted>

8.1 Termination. This Agreement may be validly terminated, and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement may be abandoned, at any time prior to the Offer Acceptance Time only as follows (it being understood and agreed that this Agreement may not be terminated for any other reason or on any other basis):
<omitted>

(h) by the Company (on behalf of the Company Parties), at any time prior to the Offer Acceptance Time if (i) the Company has received a Superior Proposal; (ii) the Company Board (or a committee thereof) has authorized the Company to enter into a definitive Alternative Acquisition Agreement to consummate the Acquisition Transaction contemplated by that Superior Proposal; (iii) the Company Parties have complied in all material respects with Section 5.3 with respect to such Superior Proposal; and (iv) concurrently with such termination the Company pays the Company Termination Fee due to the Parent Entities in accordance with Section 8.3(b). (Page 90)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
5.3 No Solicitation.
<omitted>

8.1 Termination. This Agreement may be validly terminated
<omitted>

(h) by the Company (on behalf of the Company Parties), at any time prior to the Offer Acceptance Time if (i) the Company has received a Superior Proposal; <omitted> (iii) the Company Parties have complied in all material respects with Section 5.3 with respect to such Superior Proposal (Page 90)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 6.3. Acquisition Proposals. 

(a) The Company shall not, and shall instruct its Representatives not to: (i) directly or indirectly initiate, solicit, or knowingly encourage or knowingly facilitate (including by way of providing information) any inquiries, proposals or offers, or the making of any submission or announcement of any inquiry, proposal or offer that constitutes or would reasonably be expected to lead to any Acquisition Proposal, (ii) directly or indirectly engage in, enter into or participate in any discussions or negotiations with any Person with respect to any Acquisition Proposal or (iii) provide any non-public information to, or afford access to the business, properties, assets, books or records of the Company to, any Person (other than Parent, Purchaser, or any designees of Parent or Purchaser) in connection with any Acquisition Proposal. The Company shall, and shall cause its directors and officers to, and shall direct its other Representatives to, (x) immediately cease any solicitation, discussions, or negotiations with any Person (other than Parent, Purchaser, or any designees of Parent or Purchaser) with respect to any Acquisition Proposal,
<omitted>
(e) Notwithstanding Section 6.3(d) or any other provision of this Agreement, prior to the Acceptance Time: 

(i) the Company may terminate this Agreement to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement if (A) the Company receives an Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a material breach of Section 6.3(a) and that the Company Board or a committee thereof determines in good faith, after consultation with outside counsel, constitutes a Superior Proposal, (B) the Company has notified Parent in writing that it intends to terminate this Agreement to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement and (C) no earlier than the end of the Notice Period, the Company Board or any committee thereof determines in good faith that the Acquisition Proposal that is subject of the Determination Notice continues to constitute a Superior Proposal and that the failure to terminate this Agreement would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, after consultation with outside counsel and taking into consideration the terms of any proposed amendment or modification to this Agreement that Parent has irrevocably committed to make during the Notice Period; (Page 47)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 6.3. Acquisition Proposals. 

(a) <omitted> The Company shall <omitted> (x) immediately cease any solicitation <omitted> with respect to any Acquisition Proposal
<omitted>
(e) Notwithstanding Section 6.3(d) or any other provision of this Agreement, prior to the Acceptance Time: 

(i) the Company may terminate this Agreement to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement if (A) the Company receives an Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a material breach of Section 6.3(a) and that the Company Board or a committee thereof determines <omitted> constitutes a Superior Proposal (Page 47)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 5.4 Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> (b)          (i)            Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors of VEREIT and the Board of Directors of Realty Income shall each be permitted, prior to its respective meeting of stockholders to be held pursuant to Section 5.1, and subject to (A) compliance with the other terms of this Section 5.4 and (B) first entering into a confidentiality agreement having provisions that are no less favorable to such party than those contained in the Confidentiality Agreement (provided that such agreement need not contain any standstill or similar provision prohibiting the making of an Acquisition Proposal), to engage in discussions and negotiations with, or provide any nonpublic information or data to, any Person in response to an unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition Proposal by such Person first made after the date of this Agreement (that did not result from a material breach of this Section 5.4) and which the Board of Directors of VEREIT or the Board of Directors of Realty Income, as applicable, concludes in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel and financial advisors) constitutes or is reasonably likely to result in a Superior Proposal, if and only to the extent that the directors of VEREIT or of Realty Income, as applicable, conclude in good faith (after consultation with their outside legal counsel) that failure to do so would reasonably be expected to result in a breach of their duties to VEREIT or Realty Income, as applicable. VEREIT or Realty Income, as applicable, shall provide the other with a copy of any nonpublic information or data provided to a third party pursuant to the prior sentence prior to or substantially concurrently with furnishing such information to such third party (except to the extent that such nonpublic information or data shall have been previously provided to the other party).  <omitted> Section 7.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective Time, by action taken or authorized by the Board of Directors of the terminating party or parties, whether before or after approval of the Merger by the stockholders of VEREIT or Realty Income: <omitted> (d)               by VEREIT, upon written notice to Realty Income:   (i)                 at any time prior to the receipt of the VEREIT Required Stockholders Vote in order to enter into an Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal in accordance with the express terms and conditions of Section 5.4; provided, however, that this Agreement may not be so terminated unless the payment required by Section 7.2(b)(i) is made in full to Realty Income substantially concurrently with the occurrence of such termination and the entry into such Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal; and (Page 40)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 5.4 Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> (b)          (i)            Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors of VEREIT and the Board of Directors of Realty Income shall each be permitted, <omitted> to engage in discussions and negotiations with, or provide any nonpublic information or data to, any Person in response to an unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition Proposal by such Person first made after the date of this Agreement (that did not result from a material breach of this Section 5.4)   <omitted> 

Section 7.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated <omitted> (d)               by VEREIT, upon written notice to Realty Income:   (i)                 at any time prior to the receipt of the VEREIT Required Stockholders Vote in order to enter into an Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal in accordance with the express terms and conditions of Section 5.4; (Page 40)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 5.5 No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted>

(d)               If, at any time after the date of this Agreement and prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company Board receives a Company Acquisition Proposal that the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, constitutes a Company Superior Proposal that was not initiated, sought, solicited, knowingly facilitated, knowingly encouraged, knowingly induced or otherwise procured in breach of this Agreement, the Company Board may effect a Company Adverse Recommendation Change or terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(c)(ii) in order to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to such Company Superior Proposal if (A) the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law; (B) the Company provides Parent with five (5) Business Days’ prior written notice of the Company Board’s intention to effect such a Company Adverse Recommendation Change or terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(c)(ii), which notice shall include the identity of the party (or parties) making such Company Superior Proposal, the material terms of such Company Superior Proposal (including the price) and copies of the current drafts of material agreements providing for such Company Superior Proposal; (C) for a period of five (5) Business Days following the notice delivered pursuant to clause (B) of this Section 5.5(d), the Company shall have discussed and negotiated in good faith and made the Company’s Representatives available to discuss and negotiate in good faith (in each case to the extent Parent desires to negotiate) with Parent’s Representatives any proposed modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that the failure to take such action would no longer reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the fiduciary duties of the Company Board under applicable Law (it being understood and agreed that any amendment to any material term or condition of any Company Superior Proposal shall require a new notice and a new three (3)-Business Day negotiation period); and (D) no earlier than the end of such negotiation period, the Company Board shall have determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and after considering the terms of any proposed amendment or modification to this Agreement, that (x) the Company Acquisition Proposal that is the subject of the notice described in clause (B) above still constitutes a Company Superior Proposal and (y) the failure to take such action would still be reasonably expected to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law.  (Pages 28-29)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 5.4    Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> (d) <omitted> the Special Committee may at any time prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, but not after, make an Adverse Recommendation Change or terminate this Agreement to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal in accordance with Section 7.1(c)(ii), or authorize, resolve, agree or propose publicly to take any such action, if all of the following conditions are met: <omitted> (i)    (A) the Company shall have provided to Parent four Business Days’ prior written notice <omitted> (ii)    the Company Board (acting upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) shall have determined, in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that, in light of such Superior Proposal and taking into account any revised terms proposed by Parent, such Superior Proposal continues to constitute a Superior Proposal and that the failure to make such Adverse Recommendation Change or to so terminate this Agreement in accordance with Section 7.1(c)(ii), as applicable, would be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary duties under applicable Law. <omitted> Section 7.1    Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after, the Company Stockholder Approval has been obtained (with any termination by Parent also being an effective termination by Merger Sub): <omitted> (c)    by the Company: <omitted> (ii)    at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, if (A) the Company Board (acting upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) authorizes the Company, to the extent permitted by and subject to complying with the terms of Section 5.4(d), to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal, (B) concurrently with the termination of this Agreement, the Company, subject to complying with the terms of Section 5.4(d) enters into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement providing for a Superior Proposal and (C) prior to or concurrently with such termination, the Company pays to Parent in immediately available funds the Company-Paid Termination Fee;  (Page 63)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
6.3 No Solicitation. <omitted> (e) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary: <omitted> (iii) prior to, but not after, the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, in response to a bona fide written Company Competing Proposal from a third party that was not solicited at any time following the execution of this Agreement by the Company, its officers or directors or any of its other Representatives and did not otherwise arise from a breach of the obligations set forth in this Section 6.3, if the Company Board so chooses, the Company Board may effect a Company Change of Recommendation or terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(e), <omitted> 

8.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Merger Effective Time, whether(except as expressly set forth below) before or after Company Stockholder Approval has been obtained: <omitted> 

(e) by the Company, if, prior to, but not after, the time the Company Stockholder Approval is obtained (A) the Company Board authorizes the Company, to the extent permitted by and subject to complying with the terms of Section 6.3, to enter into a Company Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Company Superior Proposal, (Page 105)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
7.3 Acquisition Proposals; Change of Recommendation. <omitted> (d) No Change of Recommendation. <omitted>  

(ii) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Section 7.3, prior to the time the Requisite Company Vote is obtained, the Company Board may (A) effect a Change of Recommendation if (x)(1) a written Acquisition Proposal that the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) is bona fide and that did not arise from or in connection with a breach of the obligations set forth in this Section 7.3 is received by the Company after the date of this Agreement and is not withdrawn prior to the Change of Recommendation, and the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and a financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation, that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal or (2) an Intervening Event has occurred, and (y) the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and a financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation, that failure to effect a Change of Recommendation would reasonably be likely to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law or (B) take action to terminate this Agreement pursuant to, and in accordance with, Section 9.3(b) to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a written Acquisition Proposal that the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) is bona fide and that did not arise from or in connection with a breach of the obligations set forth in this Section 7.3 and that the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and a financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation, that (1) such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal and (2) failure to effect a Change of Recommendation would reasonably be likely to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law; (Page 72)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 6.3 No Solicitation; Other Offers. <omitted> (b) Exceptions. <omitted> (ii) Exception for Superior Proposal. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, but subject to compliance with Section 6.3(c), at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, if the Company has received a Superior Proposal that is not a result of a breach of this Section 6.3 <omitted> 

Section 10.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time (notwithstanding receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval) only as follows: <omitted> 
(d) by the Company, at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, if the Company, subject to complying with the terms of this Agreement (including Section 6.3), enters into a definitive Alternative Acquisition Agreement concerning a Superior Proposal (Page 65)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer, (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Section 7.3 No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> (d) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary: <omitted> (iii) prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, in response to an unsolicited bona fide written Company Competing Proposal from a third party made after the date of this Agreement that has not been withdrawn (provided that the Company Competing Proposal by such Person did not result from a breach or violation of this Section 7.3) <omitted> (2) the Company may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.1(d) to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to a Company Superior Proposal <omitted> 

Section 9.1Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger and the other Transactions contemplated hereby may be abandoned at any time prior to the Closing, whether (except as expressly set forth below) before or after the Company Stockholder Approval has been obtained: <omitted> (d) by the Company if, prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, and if the Company has complied in all material respects with Section 7.3(b) and Section 7.3(d)(iii) in respect of such Company Superior Proposal, the Company Board determines to terminate this Agreement in accordance with Section 7.3(d)(iii) in connection with a Company Superior Proposal and the Company Board has approved, and immediately after the termination hereunder, the Company enters into, a definitive agreement providing for the implementation of such Company Superior Proposal; provided, however, that such termination shall not be effective unless the Company concurrently therewith pays or causes to be paid the Company Termination Fee in accordance with Section 9.3(b); or (Page 79)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 5.6 Solicitation; Acquisition Proposals; Adverse Recommendation Change. <omitted> Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, at any time prior to obtaining the Company Requisite Vote, the Company Board may <omitted> (B) if the Company has not breached this Section 5.6(e) or Section 5.6(f) (other than, in the case of Section 5.6(f) any breach that has a de minimis effect) and has not breached the other subsections of this Section 5.6 in any material respect, <omitted> terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(c)(i) if the Company Board has received (x) after the date hereof and prior to the Cut-Off Time from an Excluded Party a Company Acquisition Proposal or (y) after the No-Shop Period Start Date, an unsolicited written bona fide Company Acquisition Proposal that, in each case of clauses (x) and (y), did not result from a breach of this Section 5.6 and in the good faith determination of the Company Board, after consultation with outside legal counsel and financial advisors, constitutes a Superior Proposal, after having complied (other than any non-compliance that has a de minimis effect) with, and giving effect to all of the adjustments which may be offered by Parent pursuant to Section 5.6(f), and such Company Acquisition Proposal is not withdrawn. (Page 32)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer, (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement