Sansaboo/maud huggingface dataset:
Section 6.3          No Solicitation of Transactions. <omitted> (b)         Notwithstanding Section 6.3(a), at any time following the date of this Agreement and prior to the time when the Company Stockholder Approval is obtained (and in no event after the Company Stockholder Approval is obtained), in response to a bona fide written Acquisition Proposal received after the date hereof that the Company Board determines in good faith After Consultation constitutes or would reasonably be expected to result in a Superior Proposal, and with respect to which the Company Board determines in good faith After Consultation, that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary duties to the Company’s stockholders under applicable Law, then the Company and the Representatives of the Company may, subject to compliance with this Section 6.3, (i) engage or participate in discussions or negotiations with, and only with, the Person (or such Person’s representatives) that has made such Acquisition Proposal, and (ii) furnish to the Person (or such Person’s representatives) that has made the Acquisition Proposal information relating to the Company and the Company Subsidiaries or afford access to the business, properties, assets, books, records or the personnel of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries, in each case pursuant to an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement; provided that the Company did not receive such Acquisition Proposal in connection with or as a result of breaching or violating the terms of this Section 6.3 (other than an isolated, inadvertent and immaterial breach or violation).  (Page 38)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
5.3 No Solicitation. <omitted> (c) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Section 5.3(b) or elsewhere in this Agreement, if at any time during the Pre-Closing Period any Acquired Corporation or any of their respective Representatives receives an unsolicited written inquiry, proposal, offer or Acquisition Proposal from any Person or group of Persons which Acquisition Proposal was made or renewed on or after the date of this Agreement, (i) the Company and its Representatives may contact such Person or group of Persons to clarify the terms and conditions thereof and (ii) if the Company Board determines, in good faith, after consultation with financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that such inquiry, proposal, offer or Acquisition Proposal constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Offer, then the Company and its Representatives may (x) furnish information (including non-public information pursuant to an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement) with respect to the Acquired Corporations to the Person or group of Persons making such inquiry, proposal, offer or Acquisition Proposal and their Representatives and potential financing sources and (y) engage in or otherwise participate in discussions or negotiations with the Person or group of Persons making such inquiry, proposal, offer or Acquisition Proposal and their Representatives. It is understood and agreed that any contacts, disclosures, discussions or negotiations permitted under this Section 5.3(c), by itself shall not constitute a Company Adverse Recommendation Change or otherwise constitute a basis for Parent to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(d).  (Page 44)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
Section 5.2. Go-Shop; Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> (b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Section 5.2(a) or elsewhere in this Agreement, at any time following the No-Shop Period Start Date and prior to the time the Stockholder Approval is obtained, if the Company, directly or indirectly through one or more of its Representatives, receives a written bona fide Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a breach of this Section 5.2, the Company and its Representatives may contact the Person or group of Persons making such Acquisition Proposal to clarify the terms and conditions thereof so as to determine whether such Acquisition Proposal constitutes, or could reasonably be expected to result in, a Superior Proposal, and may (i) provide information to such Person if the Company receives from such Person an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement; provided, that the Company shall make available to Parent and Merger Sub any non-public information concerning the Company or its Subsidiaries that is provided to any such Person or group of Persons which was not previously made available to Parent or Merger Sub substantially concurrently (and in any event within twenty-four (24) hours thereafter), and (ii) engage or participate in any discussions or negotiations with such Person or group of Persons, if prior to taking any action described in clause (i) or (ii) above, (A) the Company Board determines in good faith after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to result in, a Superior Proposal and (B) the Company Board determines in good faith after consultation with its outside legal counsel that failure to take such action would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary obligations under applicable Law.  (Page 47)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
Section 6.3. Acquisition Proposals. <omitted>
(b) Notwithstanding Section 6.3(a) or any other provision of this Agreement, if at any time following the date of this Agreement and prior to the Acceptance Time, (i) the Company has received a written Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a material breach of Section 6.3(a) and (ii) the Company Board or a committee thereof determines in good faith, after consultation with outside counsel and a financial advisor, that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to or result in a Superior Proposal, then the Company may (A) furnish information with respect to the Company to the Person making such Acquisition Proposal and its Representatives and (B) participate in discussions or negotiations with such Person and its Representatives regarding such Acquisition Proposal; provided, that the Company may only take the actions described in clauses (A) or (B) above if the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside counsel, that the failure to take any such action would be, or would reasonably be expected to be, inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law;  (Page 46)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
Section 5.14 No Solicitation; Change of Recommendation. <omitted> (f) Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing to the contrary, prior to the time, but not after, the Requisite KTYB Vote is obtained, KTYB may (i) provide information in response to a request therefor by a person who has made an unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition Proposal that did not result from any breach by KTYB, the KTYB Subsidiaries or any of their Representatives of this Section 5.14, providing for the acquisition of more than 20% of the assets (on a consolidated basis) or total voting power of the equity securities of KTYB if KTYB receives from the person so requesting such information an executed confidentiality agreement on terms not less restrictive to the other party than those contained in the Non-Disclosure Agreement and which expressly permits KTYB to comply with its obligations pursuant to this Section 5.14; and promptly discloses (and, if applicable, provide copies of) any such information to SYBT to the extent not previously provided to SYBT; (ii) engage or participate in any discussions or negotiations with any person who has made such an unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition Proposal as described in clause (i) of this Section 5.14(f) above; or (iii) after having complied with Section 5.14(h), approve, recommend, or otherwise declare advisable or propose to approve, recommend or declare advisable (publicly or otherwise) an Acquisition Proposal as described in clause (i) of this Section 5.14(f), if and only to the extent that, (x) prior to taking any action described in clause (i), (ii) or (iii) above, the Board of Directors of KTYB (or a duly authorized committee thereof) determines in good faith after consultation with outside legal counsel that such action is necessary in order for such directors to comply with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable law, and (y) in each such case referred to in clause (i) or (ii) above, the Board of Directors of KTYB (or a duly authorized committee thereof) has determined in good faith based on the information then available and after consultation with KTYB’s outside legal counsel and financial advisors that such Acquisition Proposal either constitutes a Superior Proposal or is reasonably likely to result in a Superior Proposal; and (z) in the case referred to in clause (iii) above, the Board of Directors of KTYB (or a duly authorized committee thereof) determines in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel) that such Acquisition Proposal is a Superior Proposal. (Page 45)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
Section 5.5 No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted>

(b)               Notwithstanding the foregoing, if at any time after the date of this Agreement and prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company receives a bona fide written Company Acquisition Proposal from a third party and such Company Acquisition Proposal was not initiated, sought, solicited, knowingly facilitated, knowingly encouraged, knowingly induced or otherwise procured in breach of this Agreement, then the Company may (i) contact the Person who has made such Company Acquisition Proposal solely to clarify the terms of such Company Acquisition Proposal so that the Company Board may inform itself about such Company Acquisition Proposal, (ii) furnish information concerning its business, properties or assets to such Person pursuant to a confidentiality agreement with confidentiality and standstill terms that, taken as a whole, are not materially less favorable to the Company than those contained in the Confidentiality Agreement and (iii) negotiate and participate in discussions and negotiations with such Person concerning such Company Acquisition Proposal, in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii), only if the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that such Company Acquisition Proposal constitutes or is reasonably likely to constitute or result in a Company Superior Proposal.  (Page 28)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
4.3. No Solicitation. <omitted> (c) If at any time after the execution and delivery of this Agreement and prior to the receipt of the Company Required Vote, any Acquired Corporation or any of their Representatives receives an unsolicited written Acquisition Proposal from any Person or group of Persons, which Acquisition Proposal was made on or after the date of this Agreement and did not result from any breach of this Section 4.3 (other than unintentional and immaterial breach), if the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Offer and the failure to take any of the following actions would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary duties under applicable Legal Requirements (a “Qualifying Acquisition Proposal”), then the Company and its Representatives may prior to (but not after) receipt of the Company Required Vote, subject to compliance with this Section 4.3, (A) furnish, pursuant to (but only pursuant to) an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement, information (including non-public information) with respect to the Acquired Corporations to the Person or group of Persons who has made such Qualifying Acquisition Proposal; provided that the Company shall concurrently provide to Parent any non-public information concerning the Acquired Corporations that is provided to any Person given such access which was not previously provided to Parent or its Representatives and (B) engage in or otherwise participate in discussions or negotiations with the Person or group of Persons making such Qualifying Acquisition Proposal with respect to such Qualifying Acquisition Proposal. (Page 42)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
6.3 No Solicitation. <omitted> 

(e) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary: <omitted> 

(ii) prior to, but not after, the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company and its Representatives may engage in the activities described in Sections 6.3(b)(ii) or 6.3(b)(iii) (it being understood that Section 6.3(b)(i) shall not prohibit actions otherwise permitted by this Section 6.3(e)(ii)) with any Person if (1) the Company receives a bona fide written Company Competing Proposal from such Person that was not solicited at any time following the execution of this Agreement by the Company, its officers or directors or any of its other Representatives and (2) such Company Competing Proposal did not otherwise arise from a breach of the obligations set forth in this Section 6.3; provided, however, that (A) no information that is prohibited from being furnished pursuant to Section 6.3(b) may be furnished until the Company receives an executed confidentiality agreement from such Person containing limitations on the use and disclosure of non-public information furnished to such Person by or on behalf of the Company that are no less favorable to the Company in the aggregate than the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement; (provided, further, that such confidentiality agreement does not contain provisions which prohibit the Company from providing any information to Isla in accordance with this Section 6.3 or that otherwise prohibits the Company from complying with this Section 6.3), (B) that any such non-public information has previously been made available to, or is made available to, Isla prior to or concurrently with (or in the case of oral non-public information only, promptly (and in any event within 24 hours) after) the time such information is made available to such Person, (C) prior to taking any such actions, the Company Board or any committee thereof determines in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that such Company Competing Proposal is, or would reasonably be expected to lead to, a Company Superior Proposal, and (D) prior to taking any such actions, the Company Board determines in good faith after consultation with its outside legal counsel that failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the fiduciary duties owed by the Company Board to the stockholders of the Company under applicable Law; (Pages 81-82)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
SECTION 5.02. No Solicitation; Adverse Recommendation Change. <omitted> (c) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Section 5.02(a), Section 5.02(b) or any other provision of this Agreement, if at any time after the execution of this Agreement and prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company or any of its Representatives receives a bona fide, written Company Takeover Proposal, which Company Takeover Proposal did not result from a breach of this Section 5.02, then in response to such Company Takeover Proposal (i) the Company and its Representatives may contact the Person or group that made such Company Takeover Proposal solely to clarify the terms and conditions thereof or to request that such Company Takeover Proposal made orally be made in writing and (ii) if the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor) that such Company Takeover Proposal constitutes or would reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal from the Person or group submitting such bona fide, written Company Takeover Proposal and that the failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the Company’s directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law (a “Qualifying Company Takeover Proposal”), the Company may, subject to compliance with Section 5.02(d), (A) enter into an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement with such Person or group making the Qualifying Company Takeover Proposal and thereafter furnish information (including non-public information) with respect to the Company to such Person or group and its Representatives pursuant to such Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement so long as, prior to or concurrently with the time such information is provided or made available to such Person or group or any of its Representatives, the Company also provides Parent any information furnished to such Person or group or any of its Representatives which was 46 not previously furnished to Parent, and (B) engage in or otherwise participate in discussions or negotiations with such Person or group and its Representatives regarding such Qualifying Company Takeover Proposal. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in herein, the Company and its Representatives may, in response to a bona fide written unsolicited Company Takeover Proposal, contact the person who made such Company Takeover Proposal solely to determine whether such person intends to provide any documents (or additional documents) containing the terms and conditions of such Company Takeover Proposal.  (Pages 54-55)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
Section 5.2 No Solicitation; Company Change in Recommendation. <omitted> (b)           Notwithstanding anything in this ​Section 5.2 to the contrary, but subject to the Company’s compliance with the provisions of this ​Section 5.2, at any time prior to the Offer Acceptance Time, if the Company receives an unsolicited written bona fide Company Alternative Proposal, the Company and its Representatives may contact the third party making such Company Alternative Proposal to clarify the terms and conditions thereof so as to determine whether such Company Alternative Proposal constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Company Superior Proposal. If (i) such Company Alternative Proposal constitutes a Company Superior Proposal or (ii) the Company Board of Directors determines in good faith after consultation with the Company’s outside legal counsel and financial advisors that such Company Alternative Proposal could reasonably be expected to lead to a Company Superior Proposal, the Company may take the following actions: (A) furnish nonpublic information to the third party making such Company Alternative Proposal (including its respective Representatives and prospective equity and debt financing sources), if, and only if, prior to so furnishing such information, the third party has executed a confidentiality agreement with the Company having provisions that are not materially less favorable in the aggregate to the Company than the provisions of the Confidentiality Agreement (it being understood that such confidentiality agreement need not prohibit


the making or amendment of any Company Alternative Proposal), and any nonpublic information regarding the Company and the Company Subsidiaries that is provided to such third party (or its Representatives) shall, to the extent not previously provided to Parent, be provided to Parent as promptly as practicable after providing it to such third party or its Representative (and in any event within 24 hours thereafter), and (B) engage in discussions or negotiations with the third party (including its respective Representatives and prospective equity and debt financing sources) with respect to the Company Alternative Proposal. (Pages 25-26)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer