Sansaboo/maud huggingface dataset:
Section 6.06 No Solicitation of Transactions. (a) <omitted> in response to a <omitted> Takeover Proposal received after the date of this Agreement <omitted> , if the Company Board of Directors determines, after consultation with its financial advisor and outside counsel, that such Takeover Proposal constitutes or would reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal, the Company may (and may authorize and permit its Subsidiaries and Representatives to), subject to compliance with Section 6.06(c) and only prior to obtaining the Company Required Vote, (x) furnish information with respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries to the Person making such Takeover Proposal (and its Representatives) pursuant to a confidentiality agreement containing confidentiality provisions no more favorable in the aggregate to such Person than those contained in the Company Confidentiality Agreement (it being understood that such confidentiality agreement need not prohibit the making or amendment of a Takeover Proposal); provided that all material information provided to such Person has previously been provided or made available to Parent or is provided to Parent prior to or substantially concurrently with the time it is provided to such Person (which nonpublic information shall, for the avoidance of doubt, be subject to the Company Confidentiality Agreement and may, in order to comply with applicable Law, be restricted to certain designated Representatives of Parent), and (y) participate in discussions and negotiations with the Person making such Takeover Proposal (and its Representatives) regarding such Takeover Proposal. (Page 48)

Question: Fiduciary exception:  Board determination standard-Answer (no-shop)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: None
Section 6.03. Go-Shop; No Solicitation. <omitted> (d)                Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 6.03, if at any time prior to the Acceptance Time, the Company or any of its Representatives has received a written Acquisition Proposal from any Third Party (including any Excluded Party, at any time) that the Company Board determines after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel, is, could lead to, result in or constitute a Superior Proposal, then the Company and its Subsidiaries, directly or indirectly through its and their Representatives, may (i) engage or participate in negotiations or discussions with such Third Party and its Representatives and (ii) furnish to such Third Party or its Representatives non-public information relating to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement; provided, that, (A) prior to or substantially concurrently with the time it is made available to such Third Party, the Company shall make available to Parent any material non-public information relating to the Company or its Subsidiaries that is made available to such Third Party and that was not previously made available to Parent or its Representatives and (B) the Company shall not provide to any such Person any non-public information of or relating to Parent, Merger Subsidiary or any of their respective Affiliates or Representatives. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary and notwithstanding the occurrence of the No-Shop Period Start Date, from and after the Cut Off Date, the Company may continue to engage in the activities described in Section 6.03(a) with respect to any Excluded Party, including with respect to any amended proposal or offer submitted by an Excluded Party following the Cut Off Date, and the restrictions in Section 6.03(b) and Section 6.03(c) will not apply with respect thereto, until the Cut Off Date. (Page 30)

Question: Fiduciary exception:  Board determination standard-Answer (no-shop)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: None
Section 6.03. Go-Shop; No Solicitation. <omitted> (d)  <omitted> if <omitted> the Company or any of its Representatives has received a written Acquisition Proposal from any Third Party (including any Excluded Party, at any time) that the Company Board determines after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel, is, could lead to, result in or constitute a Superior Proposal, then the Company and its Subsidiaries, directly or indirectly through its and their Representatives, may (i) engage or participate in negotiations or discussions with such Third Party and its Representatives and (ii) furnish to such Third Party or its Representatives non-public information relating to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement; (Page 30)

Question: Fiduciary exception:  Board determination standard-Answer (no-shop)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: None
(b)          Notwithstanding the limitations set forth in Section 5.3(a) and subject to Section 5.3(c), if the Company receives an Alternative Proposal prior to obtaining Company Stockholder Approval that did not result from a material breach of Section 5.3 with respect to which the Board of Directors of the Company determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, constitutes or could reasonably be expected to result in a Superior Proposal, the Company may take the following actions: (x) furnish nonpublic information to the third party (including such third party’s Representatives) making such Alternative Proposal, if, prior to so furnishing such information, the Company receives from the third party an executed agreement having provisions requiring such party to keep such information confidential that are substantially similar to the comparable confidentiality provisions of the Confidentiality Agreement (it being understood that such agreement need not have comparable standstill provisions) (provided that the Company shall substantially concurrently with the delivery to such person provide to Parent any non-public information concerning the Company or any of its Subsidiaries that is provided or made available to such person or its Representatives unless such non-public information has been previously provided or made available to Parent or its Representatives), and (y) engage in discussions or negotiations with the third party (including such third party’s Representatives) with respect to the Alternative Proposal. (Page 45)

Question: Fiduciary exception:  Board determination standard-Answer (no-shop)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: None
(b)          Notwithstanding the limitations set forth in Section 5.3(a) and subject to Section 5.3(c), if the Company receives an Alternative Proposal prior to obtaining Company Stockholder Approval that did not result from a material breach of Section 5.3 with respect to which the Board of Directors of the Company determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, constitutes or could reasonably be expected to result in a Superior Proposal, the Company may take the following actions: (x) furnish nonpublic information to the third party (including such third party’s Representatives) making such Alternative Proposal, <omitted> and (y) engage in discussions or negotiations with the third party (including such third party’s Representatives) with respect to the Alternative Proposal. (Page 45)

Question: Fiduciary exception:  Board determination standard-Answer (no-shop)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: None
Section 6.3          No Solicitation of Transactions. <omitted> (b)         Notwithstanding Section 6.3(a), at any time following the date of this Agreement and prior to the time when the Company Stockholder Approval is obtained (and in no event after the Company Stockholder Approval is obtained), in response to a bona fide written Acquisition Proposal received after the date hereof that the Company Board determines in good faith After Consultation constitutes or would reasonably be expected to result in a Superior Proposal, and with respect to which the Company Board determines in good faith After Consultation, that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary duties to the Company’s stockholders under applicable Law, then the Company and the Representatives of the Company may, subject to compliance with this Section 6.3, (i) engage or participate in discussions or negotiations with, and only with, the Person (or such Person’s representatives) that has made such Acquisition Proposal, and (ii) furnish to the Person (or such Person’s representatives) that has made the Acquisition Proposal information relating to the Company and the Company Subsidiaries or afford access to the business, properties, assets, books, records or the personnel of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries, in each case pursuant to an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement; provided that the Company did not receive such Acquisition Proposal in connection with or as a result of breaching or violating the terms of this Section 6.3 (other than an isolated, inadvertent and immaterial breach or violation). (Page 38)

Question: Fiduciary exception:  Board determination standard-Answer (no-shop)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: "Inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Section 6.3          No Solicitation of Transactions. <omitted> (b)         Notwithstanding Section 6.3(a), <omitted> in response to a bona fide written Acquisition Proposal <omitted> that the Company Board determines in good faith After Consultation constitutes or would reasonably be expected to result in a Superior Proposal, and with respect to which the Company Board determines in good faith After Consultation, that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary duties to the Company’s stockholders under applicable Law, then the Company and the Representatives of the Company may, subject to compliance with this Section 6.3, (i) engage or participate in discussions or negotiations with, and only with, the Person (or such Person’s representatives) that has made such Acquisition Proposal, and (ii) furnish to the Person (or such Person’s representatives) that has made the Acquisition Proposal information relating to the Company and the Company Subsidiaries or afford access to the business, properties, assets, books, records or the personnel of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries, in each case pursuant to an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement; (Page 38)

Question: Fiduciary exception:  Board determination standard-Answer (no-shop)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: "Inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Section 5.4 Non-Solicitation; Change in Recommendation. <omitted> (b)            (i)           Notwithstanding the foregoing, prior to the time the Required Company Vote is obtained, in response to the receipt of a bona fide written Acquisition Proposal (that did not result from the Company’s breach of this Section 5.4 in any material respect) made after the date of this Agreement, subject to compliance with the other terms of this Section 5.4 and the Company first entering into a confidentiality agreement with the Person who has made such Acquisition Proposal having confidentiality and use provisions that are no less favorable to the Company than those contained in the Confidentiality Agreement (an “Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement”) (it being understood that such Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement need not prohibit the making or amending of an Acquisition Proposal), the Company shall be permitted to (A) engage in discussions and negotiations with the Person who has made such Acquisition Proposal and (B) provide any nonpublic information in response to a request therefor to the Person who has made such Acquisition Proposal; provided that prior to taking any action described in clause (A) or (B) above, the Board of Trust Managers of the Company determines in good faith based on the information then available and after consultation with outside legal counsel and its financial advisor that such Acquisition Proposal either constitutes a Superior Proposal or is reasonably likely to result in a Superior Proposal (and, for the avoidance of doubt, such actions shall not a breach of Section 5.4(a)).  The Company shall provide Parent with a copy of any nonpublic information provided to any Person pursuant to the prior sentence prior to or simultaneously with furnishing such information to such Person, unless such information has been previously made available to Parent.  Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries shall enter into any agreement with any Person subsequent to the date of this Agreement that prohibits such Person from providing information to Parent in accordance with this Section 5.4. (Page 69)

Question: Fiduciary exception:  Board determination standard-Answer (no-shop)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: None
Section 5.4 Non-Solicitation; Change in Recommendation. <omitted> (b)            (i)  <omitted> in response to the receipt of a <omitted> Acquisition Proposal <omitted> and the Company first entering into a confidentiality agreement with the Person who has made such Acquisition Proposal having confidentiality and use provisions that are no less favorable to the Company than those contained in the Confidentiality Agreement <omitted> , the Company shall be permitted to (A) engage in discussions and negotiations with the Person who has made such Acquisition Proposal and (B) provide any nonpublic information in response to a request therefor to the Person who has made such Acquisition Proposal; provided that prior to taking any action described in clause (A) or (B) above, the Board of Trust Managers of the Company determines in good faith based on the information then available and after consultation with outside legal counsel and its financial advisor that such Acquisition Proposal either constitutes a Superior Proposal or is reasonably likely to result in a Superior Proposal (Page 69)

Question: Fiduciary exception:  Board determination standard-Answer (no-shop)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: None
Section 5.4 Non-Solicitation.
<omitted>
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, prior to obtaining the East Stockholder Approval, East and the East Board may take any actions described in clause (ii) in the first sentence of this Section 5.4(a) with respect to a third party if (w) after the date of this Agreement, East receives a written Acquisition Proposal with respect to East from such third party (and such Acquisition Proposal was not initiated, solicited, knowingly encouraged or knowingly facilitated by East or any of the East Subsidiaries or any of their respective Representatives), (x) East provides Central the notice required by Section 5.4(g) with respect to such Acquisition Proposal, (y) the East Board determines in good faith (after consultation with East’s financial advisors and outside legal counsel) that such proposal constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal with respect to East, and (z) the East Board determines in good faith (after consultation with East’s outside legal counsel) that the failure to participate in such discussions or negotiations or to disclose such information or data to such third party would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties; provided that East shall not deliver any information to such third party without first entering into an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement with such third party. (Page 75)

Question: Fiduciary exception:  Board determination standard-Answer (no-shop)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: "Inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
Section 5.4 Non-Solicitation.
<omitted>
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, <omitted> East and the East Board may take any actions described in clause (ii) in the first sentence of this Section 5.4(a) with respect to a third party if (w) after the date of this Agreement, East receives a written Acquisition Proposal with respect to East from such third party (and such Acquisition Proposal was not initiated, solicited, knowingly encouraged or knowingly facilitated by East or any of the East Subsidiaries or any of their respective Representatives), (x) East provides Central the notice required by Section 5.4(g) with respect to such Acquisition Proposal, (y) the East Board determines in good faith (after consultation with East’s financial advisors and outside legal counsel) that such proposal constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal with respect to East, and (z) the East Board determines in good faith (after consultation with East’s outside legal counsel) that the failure to participate in such discussions or negotiations or to disclose such information or data to such third party would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties; provided that East shall not deliver any information to such third party without first entering into an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement with such third party. (Page 75)

Question: Fiduciary exception:  Board determination standard-Answer (no-shop)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: "Inconsistent" with fiduciary duties
6.13        Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that after the date of this Agreement and prior to the receipt of the Requisite Sterling Vote, in the case of Sterling, or the Requisite Webster Vote, in the case of Webster, a party receives an unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition Proposal, such party may, and may permit its Subsidiaries and its and its Subsidiaries’ Representatives to, furnish or cause to be furnished confidential or nonpublic information or data and participate in such negotiations or discussions with the person making the Acquisition Proposal if the Board of Directors of such party concludes in good faith (after receiving the advice of its outside counsel, and with respect to financial matters, its financial advisors) that failure to take such actions would be more likely than not to result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable law; (Page 34)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Acquisition Proposal only
6.15 Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> (c) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in Section 6.15(a) and 6.15(b), in the event that after the date of this Agreement and prior to the receipt of the Requisite Parent Vote, in the case of Parent, or the Requisite Company Vote, in the case of the Company, a party receives an unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition Proposal, such party may, and may permit its Subsidiaries and its and its Subsidiaries’ Representatives to, furnish or cause to be furnished confidential or nonpublic information or data and participate in such negotiations or discussions with the person making the Acquisition Proposal if the Board of Directors of such party concludes in good faith (after receiving the advice of its outside counsel, and with respect to financial matters, its outside financial advisors) that failure to take such actions would be more likely than not to result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable law; provided, that, prior to furnishing any confidential or nonpublic information permitted to be provided pursuant to this sentence, such party shall have provided such information to the other party to this Agreement and shall have entered into a confidentiality agreement with the person making such Acquisition Proposal on terms no less favorable to it than the Confidentiality Agreement (“Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement”), which confidentiality agreement shall not provide such person with any exclusive right to negotiate with such party.  (Page 65)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Acquisition Proposal only
Section 5.04 No Solicitation. <omitted> (b) Notwithstanding Section 5.04(a), if, at any time following the date hereof but prior to the receipt of the Company Shareholder Approval, the Company or any of its Representatives receives an unsolicited bona fide written Takeover Proposal that did not result from a breach of this Section 5.04, (i) the Company and its Representatives may engage in contact with the Person or group of Persons making the Takeover Proposal solely to clarify the terms and conditions thereof or to request that any Takeover Proposal made orally be made in writing; and (ii) if the Company Board (or a committee thereof) has determined in good faith (after consultation with its independent financial advisor and outside legal counsel) that such Takeover Proposal either constitutes a Superior Proposal or would reasonably be expected to result in a Superior Proposal, then the Company and the Company Board (or a committee thereof) may, subject to Section 5.04(c), directly or indirectly through any Representative: (A) participate in negotiations or discussions with any third party that has made a bona fide, unsolicited Takeover Proposal in writing; and (B) thereafter furnish to such third party non-public information relating to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, subject to (x) first entering into an executed confidentiality agreement that constitutes an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement with such third party and (y) the Company promptly (and in any event within 24 hours) providing to Parent any such non-public information in the event such information was not previously made available to Parent; but in each case referred to in the foregoing clauses (A) and (B), only if the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law. Nothing contained herein shall prevent the Company Board from disclosing to the Company’s shareholders a position contemplated by Rule 14d-9 and Rule 14e-2(a) promulgated under the Exchange Act with regard to a Takeover Proposal, if the Company Board determines, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that failure to disclose such position would constitute a violation of applicable Law, it being understood that (i) any such disclosure made by the Company Board must be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and will not limit or otherwise affect the obligations of the Company or the Company Board and the rights of Parent under this Section 5.04 and (ii) nothing in the foregoing will be deemed to permit the Company or the Company Board (or a committee thereof) to effect a Company Adverse Recommendation Change other than in accordance with Section 5.04(d) and Section 5.04(e). (Page 43)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
Section 7.03 No Solicitation; Other Offers. <omitted> (b)           Exceptions. Notwithstanding Section 7.03(a), at any time prior to the Acceptance Time:   (i)            the Company, directly or indirectly through its Representatives, may (A) engage in discussions with any Third Party and its Representatives (including by taking any of the actions described in clause (i) or (ii) of Section 7.03(a)) that has made a bona fide written Acquisition Proposal that (i) did not result from a material breach of this Section 7.03 and (ii) the Board of Directors has determined in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and its independent financial advisor, is or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal (Page 30)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer