Sansaboo/maud huggingface dataset:
Section 5.03 Solicitation; Change of Company Recommendation. <omitted>

Section 7.01 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated, in the case of clauses (a), (b), (e), (f) or (g) below, at any time prior to the effective time, whether before or after receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval or, in the case of clauses (c) or (d) below, at any time prior to receipt of the CompanyStockholder Approval, as follows: <omitted>

(d)            by the Company, at any time prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, if (i) the Company has received a Superior Proposal, (ii) the Company Board (or any committee thereof), as permitted by Section 5.03(e), has authorized the Company to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement to consummate the Superior Proposal, (iii) the Company has complied in all respects with Section 5.03 in respect of such Superior Proposal (other than any non-compliance that was both immaterial and unintentional), (iv) the Company pays the Company Termination Fee in accordance with Section 7.02(b) and (v) substantially concurrently with such termination, the Company enters into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement to consummate such Superior Proposal;  (Page 35)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
6.1    No Solicitation. <omitted> 8.1    Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned (with respect to Sections 8.1(b) through 8.1(h), by written notice by the terminating party to the other party), whether before or, subject to the terms hereof, after stockholder approval hereof: <omitted>

(f)    by the Company, at any time prior to receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, in the event that: (i) the Company shall have received a Superior Proposal; (ii) the Company Board has determined in good faith (after consultation with outside counsel) that the failure proceed pursuant to this Section 8.1(f) would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary obligations under applicable law; (iii) so long as the Company and its Subsidiaries are not in material breach of their obligations pursuant to Section 6.1 with respect to such Superior Proposal; (iv) the Company has notified the Parent in writing that it intends to enter into a definitive agreement relating to such Superior Proposal, specifying the material terms and conditions of such Superior Proposal (a “Superior Proposal Notice”) (it being understood that the Superior Proposal Notice shall not constitute a Company Board Recommendation Change or a Trigger Event for purposes of this Agreement); (v) if requested by the Parent, the Company shall have made its Representatives available to negotiate with the Parent’s Representatives any proposed modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement during the three (3) Business Day period following delivery by the Company to the Parent of such Superior Proposal Notice; provided, however, that in the event of any material revisions to such Superior Proposal, the Company will be required to notify Parent of such revisions and the applicable three (3) Business Day period described above shall be extended until two (2) Business Days after the time Parent receives notification from the Company of such revisions; (vi) if the Parent shall have delivered to the Company a written, binding and irrevocable offer to alter the terms or conditions of this Agreement during such three (3) Business Day period, the Company Board shall have determined in good faith (after consultation with outside counsel), after considering the terms of such offer by the Parent, that the Superior Proposal giving rise to such Superior Proposal Notice continues to be a Superior Proposal and it would still be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary obligations of the Company Board under applicable law not to accept such Superior Proposal; and (vii) concurrently with the termination of this Agreement, the Company pays the Parent the Termination Fee contemplated by Section 8.3(b)(ii) and enters into the definitive agreement to consummate the transaction contemplated by such Superior Proposal;  (Page 50)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
8.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the transactions contemplated hereby may be abandoned (with respect to Sections 8.1(b) through 8.1(i), by written notice by the terminating party to the other party) at any time prior to the Acceptance Time: <omitted> (e) by the Company, at any time prior to the Acceptance Time, in order to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to a Superior Company Proposal, but only if the Company has not breached, in any respect (other than a de minimis breach), its obligations under Section 6.3 with respect to such Superior Company Proposal; (Page 76)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Other
SECTION 8.01. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after the Company Requisite Vote is obtained: <omitted> (c) by the Company: (i) prior to the time the Company Requisite Vote is obtained and subject to the Company being in compliance with Section 5.02, in order to accept a Superior Proposal and enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal;  (Page 56)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Any breach of no-shop
SECTION 5.3 No Solicitation by the Company; Company Recommendation.
<omitted>

(d) <omitted> provided, however, that the Company Board and the Company Special Committee shall not, and shall cause the Company not to, make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change in connection with a Company Superior Proposal unless (I) the Company has given Parent at least four (4) Business Days’ prior written notice of its intention to take such action <omitted> (II) the Company has negotiated, and has caused its Representatives to negotiate, in good faith with Parent during such notice period, to the extent Parent wishes to negotiate, to enable Parent to propose in writing a binding offer to effect revisions to the terms of this Agreement such that it would cause such Company Superior Proposal to no longer constitute a Company Superior Proposal, (III) following the end of such notice period, the Company Board or the Company Special Committee shall have considered in good faith any such binding offer from Parent, and shall have determined that the Company Superior Proposal would continue to constitute a Company Superior Proposal if the revisions proposed in such binding offer were to be given effect and (IV) in the event of any material change to the material terms of such Company Superior Proposal, the Company shall, in each case, have delivered to Parent an additional notice consistent with that described in clause (I) above and the notice period shall have recommenced, except that the notice period shall be at least two (2) Business Days (rather than the four (4) Business Days otherwise contemplated by clause (I) above); <omitted>
SECTION 8.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated  <omitted>
(c) by the Company: <omitted>
(iii) prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, in order to effect a Company Adverse Recommendation Change and concurrently enter into a definitive agreement providing for a Company Superior Proposal; provided that the Company has complied in all material respects with the terms of Section 5.3(d).  (Page 64)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Section 6.02 Non-Solicitation <omitted> Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, at any time prior to the receipt of  the  Required  Company  Stockholder  Approval,  but  not  after,  the  Company Board  (upon  the  recommendation  of  the Company  Special  Committee)  shall be permitted, so long as the Company is not in material violation of this Section 6.02 and subject  to  compliance  with Section  6.02(d), (x)  to  terminate  this  Agreement  to  concurrently  enter  into  a  definitive Alternative Acquisition  Agreement  with  respect  to  a  Superior  Proposal pursuant  to  Section  8.01(h) 
<omitted> 
Section 8.01 Termination. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement may be terminated and the Merger and the other Transactions may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time notwithstanding receipt of the Required Company Stockholder Approval (except as expressly noted below), only as follows: 
<omitted> 
(h) b y the Company (upon approval from the Company Special Committee), at any time prior to the receipt of the Required Company Stockholder Approval, in order to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal; provided, that, prior to any such termination (i) the Company Board (or Company Special Committee, as applicable) 

78


authorizes the Company to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal to the extent permitted by, and subject to the terms and conditions of, Section 6.02, (ii) substantially concurrently with the termination of this Agreement, the Company enters into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement providing for such Superior Proposal, (iii) the Company has complied in all material respects with, and is not in material breach of, the provisions of Section 6.02 and (iv) that the Company pays to Parent (or one or more of its designees) the Company Termination Fee prior to or concurrently with such termination; or (Pages 82-83)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 6.02.Acquisition Proposals; Change of Recommendation.<omitted> Section 8.03.Termination by the Company. Subject to the other provisions of this Article VIII, this Agreement may be terminated and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement may be abandoned by the Company: <omitted> (b)           at any time prior to the Offer Acceptance Time, in order for (i) the Company Board to cause or permit the Company or any of the Company’s Subsidiaries to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal that did not result from a violation of Section 6.02 and/or (ii) the Company to enter into or cause one of its Subsidiaries to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal that did not result from a violation of Section 6.02; provided, that the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 8.03(b) shall not be available to the Company if it has breached in any material respect its obligations under Section 6.02(d) with respect to such Superior Proposal.  (Page 39)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 6.3 No Solicitation; Other Offers. <omitted> (b) Exceptions. <omitted> (ii) Exception for Superior Proposal. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, but subject to compliance with Section 6.3(c), at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, if the Company has received a Superior Proposal that is not a result of a breach of this Section 6.3 <omitted> 

Section 10.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time (notwithstanding receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval) only as follows: <omitted> 
(d) by the Company, at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, if the Company, subject to complying with the terms of this Agreement (including Section 6.3), enters into a definitive Alternative Acquisition Agreement concerning a Superior Proposal (Page 65)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer, (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Section 6.02 Company No Solicitation. <omitted> (b)              Company Superior Proposal.  Notwithstanding Section 6.02(a), prior to the receipt of the Requisite Company Vote, the Company directly or indirectly through any Representative, may, subject to Section 6.02(c):  (i) participate in negotiations or discussions with any Third Party that has made (and not withdrawn) a bona fide Company Takeover Proposal that did not arise from a breach of the obligations set forth in Section 6.02(a) in writing that the Company Board believes in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and the Company Financial Advisor constitutes or would reasonably be expected to lead to a Company Superior Proposal; <omitted>

Section 10.04          Termination by the Company.  This Agreement may be terminated by the Company at any time prior to the Effective Time: 

(a)            if prior to the receipt of the Requisite Company Vote at the Company Stockholders Meeting, the Company Board authorizes the Company, to the extent permitted by and subject to full compliance with the applicable terms and conditions of Section 6.02 hereof, to enter into a definitive agreement in respect of a Company Superior Proposal; provided, that the Company shall have paid any amounts due pursuant to Section 10.06(a)(ii) hereof in accordance with the terms, and at the times, specified therein; and provided further, that in the event of such termination, the Company substantially concurrently enters into such definitive agreement with respect to such Company Superior Proposal; or  (Page 104)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 6.04. No Solicitation; Other Offers. <omitted> (ii) subject to compliance with ​Section 6.04(d), the Board of Directors may, (A) in response to its receipt of a bona fide unsolicited written Acquisition Proposal which did not result from a breach of this ​Section 6.04 and that the Board of Directors has determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor, constitutes a Superior Proposal, make an Adverse Recommendation Change or terminate this Agreement pursuant to and in accordance with ​Section 10.01(d)(i) in order to enter into a definitive agreement for a Superior Proposal, 

Section 10.01.Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time (notwithstanding any approval of this Agreement by the stockholders of the Company): <omitted> 
(d)            by the Company, if:   (i)            prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, the Board of Directors authorizes the Company to enter into a written agreement concerning a Superior Proposal, subject to compliance with ​Section 6.04, provided that concurrently with such termination, the Company pays to Parent (or its designee) the Termination Fee payable pursuant to ​​Section 11.04 and enters into the Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal; (Page 34)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
SECTION 7.03      No Solicitation. <omitted> ( e )         Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval but subject to compliance with Section 7.03(a), if in response to an unsolicited Acquisition Proposal made after the date of this Agreement that has not been withdrawn and that did not result from a breach of this Section 7.03, the Company Board determines (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors) that such Acquisition Proposal is a Superior Proposal and determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel) that its failure to take such action would, or would be reasonably likely to, violate its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, then (i) the Company Board may make an Adverse Recommendation Change and/or (ii) the Company may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.01(d)(ii) in order to enter into an Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal; provided, however, that the Company shall not terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.01(d)(ii) unless the Company (A) prior to, or concurrently with, such termination, pays, or causes to be paid, to Parent (or its designee) the Company Termination Fee and (B) concurrently with such termination, enters into a definitive agreement that documents the terms and conditions of such Superior Proposal. (Page 27)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 5.3 <omitted> (d)           Notwithstanding anything in this Section 5.3 or Section 5.4 to the contrary, at any time prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company Board of Directors may (i) make a Change of Recommendation in response to an Intervening Event, or (ii) following receipt of a bona fide written Competing Proposal, which the Company Board of Directors determines in good faith after consultation with the Company’s outside legal and financial advisors is a Superior Proposal, (A) make a Change of Recommendation or (B) if such Competing Proposal did not result from a breach of Section 5.3(a), terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(g) in order to enter into a definitive agreement providing for such Superior Proposal, in each case with respect to clauses (i) and (ii), if and only if the Company Board of Directors has determined in good faith after consultation with the Company’s outside legal counsel that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with the duties of the members of the Company Board of Directors under applicable Law and the Company complies with Section 5.3(e).
 <omitted> Section 8.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Mergers and the other Transactions may be abandoned (except as otherwise provided below, whether before or after receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, if applicable) as follows: <omitted> (g)           by the Company, prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, pursuant to Section 5.3(d)(ii)(B), in order to enter into a definitive agreement providing for a Superior Proposal, provided that the Company shall have paid the Company Termination Fee pursuant to Section 8.2(b) (iv) simultaneously with or prior to such termination.  (Page 36)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
7.3 Acquisition Proposals; Change of Recommendation. <omitted> (d) No Change of Recommendation. <omitted>  

(ii) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Section 7.3, prior to the time the Requisite Company Vote is obtained, the Company Board may (A) effect a Change of Recommendation if (x)(1) a written Acquisition Proposal that the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) is bona fide and that did not arise from or in connection with a breach of the obligations set forth in this Section 7.3 is received by the Company after the date of this Agreement and is not withdrawn prior to the Change of Recommendation, and the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and a financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation, that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal or (2) an Intervening Event has occurred, and (y) the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and a financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation, that failure to effect a Change of Recommendation would reasonably be likely to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law or (B) take action to terminate this Agreement pursuant to, and in accordance with, Section 9.3(b) to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a written Acquisition Proposal that the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) is bona fide and that did not arise from or in connection with a breach of the obligations set forth in this Section 7.3 and that the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and a financial advisor of nationally recognized reputation, that (1) such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal and (2) failure to effect a Change of Recommendation would reasonably be likely to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law; (Page 72)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 8.4 No Solicitation by the Company; Company Acquisition Proposals. <omitted>  (e) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, at any time prior to the receipt of the Parent Shareholder Approval, (i) the Conflicts Committee and the Company Board may make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change or terminate this Agreement in accordance with Section 10.1(d)(iii) (including payment in full of the Company Termination Fee) in order to substantially concurrently enter into a Company Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal if (i) the Company receives a written Acquisition Proposal that the Conflicts Committee and the Company Board believe in good faith to be bona fide, (ii) such Acquisition Proposal was not the result of a violation of Section 8.4(a), (iii) the Conflicts Committee and the Company Board determine in good faith (after consultation with their respective outside legal and financial advisors) that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal, after taking into account all of the adjustments that have been offered (and not withdrawn) by Parent pursuant to Section 8.4(f)(i), and (D) the Conflicts Committee and the Company Board determine in good faith (after consultation with the their respective outside legal advisors), that the failure to make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change would be inconsistent with its duties under applicable Law; and (ii) in circumstances not involving an Acquisition Proposal, the Conflicts Committee and the Company Board may make a Company Adverse Recommendation Change if, and only if, after the date of this Agreement, the Conflicts Committee and the Company Board determine in good faith (after consultation with their respective outside legal advisors) that (A) a Company Intervening Event has occurred or arisen, and (B) the failure to do so would be inconsistent with its duties under applicable Law.  (Page 112)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer