Sansaboo/maud huggingface dataset:
Section 6.5 Non-Solicitation; Competing Proposals. <omitted> (d) <omitted> Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, at any time prior to receipt of the Requisite Stockholder Approval, the board of directors of the Company may <omitted> (B) if the Company has received a bona fide, unsolicited Competing Proposal which did not result from a material breach of this Section 6.5 and that is not withdrawn, and the board of directors of the Company has determined in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors) that such Competing Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal, make an Adverse Recommendation Change or terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(c)(ii) (including making payment of the Termination Fee) and substantially concurrently enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Competing Proposal that constitutes a Superior Proposal, if and only if, the board of directors of the Company has determined in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors) that the failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law and the Company has complied in all material respects with this Section 6.5 with respect to such Competing Proposal and the Person making   43


such Competing Proposal; 
<omitted> 
Section 8.1 Termination. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after the Requisite Stockholder Approval is obtained (except as otherwise expressly noted), as follows: <omitted> (c) by the Company, if: 
<omitted> 
(ii) prior to receipt of the Requisite Stockholder Approval, the board of directors of the Company shall have authorized the Company to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal in accordance with Section 6.5(d) (after compliance in all material respects with the terms of Section 6.5); provided, that (i) substantially concurrently with such termination, the Company enters into the Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal and (ii) prior to or substantially concurrently with such termination, the Company pays (or causes to be paid) the Termination Fee to (or at the direction of) Parent; or (Page 70)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 6.5 Non-Solicitation; Competing Proposals. <omitted> (d) <omitted> the board of directors of the Company may <omitted> (B) if the Company has received a <omitted> Competing Proposal which did not result from a material breach of this Section 6.5 and <omitted> such Competing Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal, <omitted> terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(c)(ii) 
<omitted> 
Section 8.1 Termination. <omitted> this Agreement may be terminated <omitteed> : <omitted> (c) by the Company, if: 
<omitted> 
(ii) <omitted> the board of directors of the Company shall have authorized the Company to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal in accordance with Section 6.5(d) (after compliance in all material respects with the terms of Section 6.5); (Page 70)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 7.2 Company Acquisition Proposals. <omitted>
(e) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement but subject to Section 7.2(f), prior to the time the Company Stockholder Approval is obtained, the Company Board may effect a Company Adverse Recommendation Change (and, in the case of a Company Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a breach of this Section 7.2, terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.1(d)(ii) and concurrently pay the fees required by Section 9.3 in order to enter into a definitive agreement in connection with a Superior Proposal) if: (i) (A) a bona fide written Company Acquisition Proposal is made to the Company after the date of this Agreement that did not result from a breach of this Section 7.2 and such Company Acquisition Proposal is not withdrawn prior to such Company Adverse Recommendation Change or (B) there has been an Intervening Event; (ii) in the case of a Company Acquisition Proposal, the Company Board concludes in good faith, after consultation with the Company’s outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that (x) such Company Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal and (y) failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Laws; and (iii) in the case of an Intervening Event, the Company Board concludes in good faith, after consultation with the Company’s outside legal counsel, that failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Laws. (Page 75)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: Any breach of no-shop
Section 7.2 Company Acquisition Proposals. <omitted>
(e) the Company Board may <omitted> in the case of a Company Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a breach of this Section 7.2, terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.1(d)(ii) <omitted> in order to enter into a definitive agreement in connection with a Superior Proposal) (Page 75)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: Any breach of no-shop
6.1    No Solicitation. <omitted> 8.1    Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned (with respect to Sections 8.1(b) through 8.1(h), by written notice by the terminating party to the other party), whether before or, subject to the terms hereof, after stockholder approval hereof: <omitted>

(f)    by the Company, at any time prior to receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, in the event that: (i) the Company shall have received a Superior Proposal; (ii) the Company Board has determined in good faith (after consultation with outside counsel) that the failure proceed pursuant to this Section 8.1(f) would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary obligations under applicable law; (iii) so long as the Company and its Subsidiaries are not in material breach of their obligations pursuant to Section 6.1 with respect to such Superior Proposal; (iv) the Company has notified the Parent in writing that it intends to enter into a definitive agreement relating to such Superior Proposal, specifying the material terms and conditions of such Superior Proposal (a “Superior Proposal Notice”) (it being understood that the Superior Proposal Notice shall not constitute a Company Board Recommendation Change or a Trigger Event for purposes of this Agreement); (v) if requested by the Parent, the Company shall have made its Representatives available to negotiate with the Parent’s Representatives any proposed modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement during the three (3) Business Day period following delivery by the Company to the Parent of such Superior Proposal Notice; provided, however, that in the event of any material revisions to such Superior Proposal, the Company will be required to notify Parent of such revisions and the applicable three (3) Business Day period described above shall be extended until two (2) Business Days after the time Parent receives notification from the Company of such revisions; (vi) if the Parent shall have delivered to the Company a written, binding and irrevocable offer to alter the terms or conditions of this Agreement during such three (3) Business Day period, the Company Board shall have determined in good faith (after consultation with outside counsel), after considering the terms of such offer by the Parent, that the Superior Proposal giving rise to such Superior Proposal Notice continues to be a Superior Proposal and it would still be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary obligations of the Company Board under applicable law not to accept such Superior Proposal; and (vii) concurrently with the termination of this Agreement, the Company pays the Parent the Termination Fee contemplated by Section 8.3(b)(ii) and enters into the definitive agreement to consummate the transaction contemplated by such Superior Proposal; (Page 50)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
6.1    No Solicitation. <omitted> 8.1    Termination. This Agreement may be terminated <omitted>

(f)    by the Company, <omitted> in the event that: (i) the Company shall have received a Superior Proposal; <omitted> (iii) so long as the Company and its Subsidiaries are not in material breach of their obligations pursuant to Section 6.1 with respect to such Superior Proposal; (Page 50)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
9.1         Termination.  This Agreement may be terminated, and the Mergers and the other transactions contemplated hereby may be abandoned, at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after stockholder adoption thereof: <omitted> (c)          by the Company or Hospitality, by written notice to Parent, <omitted> (i)          at any time prior to the time the Requisite Vote is obtained, (A) if after complying with Section 7.5(b) in connection with a Superior Proposal, both the Company Board and the Hospitality Board have authorized the Paired Entities to enter into a definitive written agreement providing for the implementation of a Superior Proposal that did not result from a breach of Section 7.5, (B) the Company and Hospitality enter into a definitive written agreement providing for such Superior Proposal concurrently with or immediately after the termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms and (C) the Paired Entities, prior to or concurrently with, such termination, pay to Parent (or its designee) the Termination Fee in accordance with Section 9.2(b)(i); (Page 79)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
9.1         Termination.  This Agreement may be terminated, and the Mergers and the other transactions contemplated hereby may be abandoned, at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after stockholder adoption thereof: <omitted> (c)          by the Company or Hospitality, by written notice to Parent, <omitted> (i)         <omitted> (A) if after complying with Section 7.5(b) in connection with a Superior Proposal, both the Company Board and the Hospitality Board have authorized the Paired Entities to enter into a definitive written agreement providing for the implementation of a Superior Proposal that did not result from a breach of Section 7.5 (Page 79)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 5.4    Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> (d) <omitted> the Special Committee may at any time prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, but not after, make an Adverse Recommendation Change or terminate this Agreement to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal in accordance with Section 7.1(c)(ii), or authorize, resolve, agree or propose publicly to take any such action, if all of the following conditions are met: <omitted> (i)    (A) the Company shall have provided to Parent four Business Days’ prior written notice <omitted> (ii)    the Company Board (acting upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) shall have determined, in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that, in light of such Superior Proposal and taking into account any revised terms proposed by Parent, such Superior Proposal continues to constitute a Superior Proposal and that the failure to make such Adverse Recommendation Change or to so terminate this Agreement in accordance with Section 7.1(c)(ii), as applicable, would be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary duties under applicable Law. <omitted> Section 7.1    Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after, the Company Stockholder Approval has been obtained (with any termination by Parent also being an effective termination by Merger Sub): <omitted> (c)    by the Company: <omitted> (ii)    at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, if (A) the Company Board (acting upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) authorizes the Company, to the extent permitted by and subject to complying with the terms of Section 5.4(d), to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal, (B) concurrently with the termination of this Agreement, the Company, subject to complying with the terms of Section 5.4(d) enters into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement providing for a Superior Proposal and (C) prior to or concurrently with such termination, the Company pays to Parent in immediately available funds the Company-Paid Termination Fee; (Page 63)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 5.4    Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> (d) <omitted> the Special Committee may <omitted>  terminate this Agreement to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal in accordance with Section 7.1(c)(ii)  <omitted> 
Section 7.1    Termination. This Agreement may be terminated <omitted> (c)    by the Company: (ii) <omitted> if (A) the Company Board (acting upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) authorizes the Company, to the extent permitted by and subject to complying with the terms of Section 5.4(d), to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal (Page 63)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
7.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated <omitted> (h) by the Company at any time prior to the Acceptance Time if the Company Board authorizes the Company to enter into a definitive Company Acquisition Agreement providing for a Superior Proposal and to, concurrently with such termination, enter into such Company Acquisition Agreement if the Company and the Company Board shall have complied in all material respects with the notice, negotiation and other requirements set forth in Section 5.4(e) and the Company, substantially concurrently with and as a condition to such termination, pays to Parent the Company Termination Fee. (Page 55)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
7.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated <omitted> (h) by the Company <omitted> to enter into a definitive Company Acquisition Agreement providing for a Superior Proposal and to, concurrently with such termination, enter into such Company Acquisition Agreement if the Company and the Company Board shall have complied in all material respects with the notice, negotiation and other requirements set forth in Section 5.4(e) (Page 55)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Section 5.3    Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> (e)    Change of Recommendation / Superior Proposal Termination. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, at any time prior to the time the Company Stockholder Approval is obtained, (x) the Company Board may make a Change of Recommendation (1) if the Company receives a bona fide unsolicited Acquisition Proposal following the Agreement Date that did not result from a violation of Section 5.3(a) and the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with the Company’s outside legal and financial advisors) based on the information then available that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal or (2) other than in connection with an Acquisition Proposal, in response to an event, occurrence, development or state of facts or circumstances occurring after the Agreement Date that was not known by the Company Board prior to the Agreement Date, in either case of (1) or (2), only if the Company Board determines in good faith that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law and (y) if the Company Board is permitted to make a Change of Recommendation pursuant to clause (x)(1), the Company may also terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1 to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to the applicable Superior Proposal; provided, however, that neither the Company Board or the Company shall take any of the foregoing actions unless: (Page 35)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 5.3    Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> (e)    Change of Recommendation / Superior Proposal Termination. <omitted> (1) if the Company receives a bona fide unsolicited Acquisition Proposal following the Agreement Date that did not result from a violation of Section 5.3(a) and the Company Board determines <omitted> that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal <omitted> the Company may also terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1 to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to the applicable Superior Proposal; (Page 35)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 7.3 No Solicitation by the Company. (a) From and after the date of this Agreement until the earlier to occur of the Effective Time and the termination of this Agreement in accordance with Article IX, and except as otherwise specifically provided for in this Section 7.3, the Company shall not, and shall cause its Subsidiaries not to, and shall not authorize or permit and use reasonable best efforts to cause any of its officers, directors, employees or Representatives not to, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage or 63
knowingly facilitate any inquiry, proposal or offer which constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to lead to, a Company AcquisitionProposal
(b) Notwithstanding the limitations set forth in Section 7.3(a)or anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, if, prior to the time the Company Shareholder Approval is obtained, the Company receives an unsolicited Company Acquisition Proposal not resulting, in whole or in part, from a breach of this Section 7.3, that the Company Board reasonably determines in good faith, after consultation with the Company’s outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, (i) is or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Company Proposal and (ii) failure to take such action would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties;

Section 9.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective Time (except as otherwise stated below): <omitted>
(d) by the Company: <omitted> (ii) if at any time prior to the receipt of the Company Shareholder Approval (A) the Company Board authorizes the Company to enter into an Alternative Company Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Company Proposal to the extent permitted by, and subject to the terms and conditions of, Section 7.3, (B) substantially concurrent with the termination of this Agreement, the Company enters into an Alternative Company Acquisition Agreement providing for a Superior Company Proposal and (C) prior to or concurrently with such termination, the Company pays to Parent in immediately available funds the Company Termination Fee required to be paid pursuant to Section 9.3(a)(i); or (Page 84)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 7.3 No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> (b) Notwithstanding the limitations set forth in Section 7.3(a)or anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, if, prior to the time the Company Shareholder Approval is obtained, the Company receives an unsolicited Company Acquisition Proposal not resulting, in whole or in part, from a breach of this Section 7.3, that the Company Board reasonably determines in good faith, after consultation with the Company’s outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, (i) is or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Company Proposal and (ii) failure to take such action would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties; <omitted> Section 9.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective Time (except as otherwise stated below): <omitted>
(d) by the Company: <omitted> (ii) if at any time prior to the receipt of the Company Shareholder Approval (A) the Company Board authorizes the Company to enter into an Alternative Company Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Company Proposal <omitted> subject to the terms and conditions of, Section 7.3 (Page 84)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 5.2 No Solicitation; Recommendations. <omitted> (ii) “Superior Proposal” means, with respect to Parent or the Company, any bona fide written Acquisition Proposal that is not solicited after the date of this Agreement in violation of Section 5.2(a) that the Parent Board or the Company Board (as applicable) determines in good faith (after consultation with outside counsel and its financial advisor), taking into account all legal, financial, regulatory and other aspects of the proposal, including the terms of any financing or financing contingencies and the likely timing of closing, and the Person making the proposal, (A) is more favorable to the stockholders of such Party from a financial point of view than the Transactions (including any adjustment to the terms and conditions proposed by the other Party in response to such proposal) and (B) would reasonably be expected to be completed on the terms proposed; provided, that, for purposes of this definition of “Superior Proposal,” references in the term “Acquisition Proposal” to “20% or more” shall be deemed to be references to “50% or more” <omitted> Section 7.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Mergers may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after the Parent Stockholder Approval or the Company Stockholder Approval has been obtained (with any termination byParent or the Company also being an effective termination by the other Parent Parties or the other Company Parties, respectively): <omitted> (e) by the Company, prior to, but not after, the time the Company Stockholder Approval is obtained, in order to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal; provided, however, that the Company shall have contemporaneously with such termination tendered payment to Parent of the Company Termination Fee pursuant to Section 7.3. (Page 102)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Any breach of no-shop
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer