Sansaboo/maud huggingface dataset:
Section 6.4           No Solicitation by the Company and Company Change in Recommendation. <omitted>

(f)           <omitted> the Company shall not be entitled to make a Company Change in Recommendation <omitted> unless: 

(i)          the Company shall have provided to Parent <omitted> notice (the “Company Superior Proposal Notice”), <omitted> advising Parent that the Company intends to take such action, <omitted>

 (iii)      <omitted> provided, however, that any (1) material revisions to the terms of a Company Superior Proposal or (2) material revisions to a Company Acquisition Proposal that the Company Board had determined no longer constitutes a Company Superior Proposal, shall constitute a new Company Acquisition Proposal and shall in each case require the Company to deliver to Parent a new Company Superior Proposal Notice, except that the references to three Business Days in this Section in this Section 6.4(f) shall be deemed to be two Business Days. (Pages 66-67)

Question: Definition includes asset deals-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: 50%
Section 6.02   Company No Solicitation.  <omitted>  (d)              Company Superior Proposal or Company Acquisition Agreement.  <omitted> the Company Board may effect a Company Adverse Recommendation Change <omitted> only if <omitted> (ii) the Company promptly notifies Parent <omitted> before making a Company Adverse Recommendation Change with respect to a Company Superior Proposal 
<omitted> , (iv) <omitted> (it being understood and agreed that in the event that, after commencement of the Company Superior Proposal Notice Period, there is any material revision to the terms of a Company Superior Proposal, including, any revision in price or financing, the Company Superior Proposal Notice Period shall be extended, if applicable, to ensure that at least two (2) Business Days remains in the Company Superior Proposal Notice Period subsequent to the time the Company notifies Parent of any such material revision (it being understood that there may be multiple extensions)), (Page 79)

Question: Definition includes asset deals-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: 50%
SECTION 7.1     Non-Solicitation; Acquisition Proposals.
<omitted>

(c) <omitted> provided, further, that the Company will not be entitled to make a Change of Recommendation <omitted> in accordance with Section 9.1(d)(iv) unless (x) the Company delivers to Parent a written notice (a “Company Notice”) advising Parent that the Company’s Board of Directors proposes to take such action and containing the material terms and conditions of the Superior Proposal that is the basis of the proposed action of the Board of Directors of the Company (including the identity of the party making such Superior Proposal and a written summary of any material terms and conditions communicated orally), and shall include with such notice unredacted copies of the proposed transaction agreement (if any) and copies of any other documents evidencing or specifying the terms and conditions of such Acquisition Proposal, and (y) at or after 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the third Business Day immediately following the day on which the Company delivered the Company Notice (such period from the time the Company Notice is provided until 5:00 p.m. New York City time on the third Business Day immediately following the day on which the Company delivered the Company Notice (it being understood that any material revision, amendment, update or supplement to the terms and conditions of such Superior Proposal shall be deemed to constitute a new Superior Proposal and shall require a new notice but with an additional two Business Days (instead of three Business Days) period from the date of such notice), the “Notice Period”), the Board of Directors of the Company reaffirms in good faith (1) after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor(s) that such Acquisition Proposal continues to constitute a Superior Proposal if the adjustments to the terms and conditions of this Agreement proposed by Parent (if any) were to be given effect and (2) after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that the failure to make a Change of Recommendation or so terminate would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law. If requested by Parent, the Company will, and will cause its subsidiaries to, and will use its reasonable best efforts to cause its or their Representatives to, during the Notice Period, engage in good faith negotiations with Parent and its Representatives to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that such Acquisition Proposal would cease to constitute a Superior Proposal. (Page 58)

Question: Definition includes asset deals-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Greater than 50% but not "all or substantially all"
SECTION 7.1     Non-Solicitation; Acquisition Proposals.
<omitted>

(c) <omitted> the Company will not be entitled to make a Change of Recommendation <omitted> unless (x) the Company delivers to Parent a written notice <omitted> (it being understood that any material revision, amendment, update or supplement to the terms and conditions of such Superior Proposal shall be deemed to constitute a new Superior Proposal and shall require a new notice but with an additional two Business Days (instead of three Business Days) period from the date of such notice), the “Notice Period”), (Page 58)

Question: Definition includes asset deals-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Greater than 50% but not "all or substantially all"
Section 5.4            Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> 

(b) <omitted> (iv)         Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, with respect to an Acquisition Proposal, the Board of Directors of VEREIT or Board of Directors of Realty Income, as applicable, may make a Change in VEREIT Recommendation or a Change in Realty Income Recommendation, as applicable (and in the event that the Board of Directors of VEREIT determines such Acquisition Proposal to be a Superior Proposal, in accordance with this Section 5.4, terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(d)(i)), in each case (including with respect to any such termination), if and only if (A) an unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition Proposal (that did not result from a material breach of this Section 5.4) is made to VEREIT or Realty Income, as applicable, by a third party, and such Acquisition Proposal is not withdrawn, (B) the Board of Directors of VEREIT or the Board of Directors of Realty Income, as applicable, has concluded in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel and financial advisors) that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal, (C) the Board of Directors of VEREIT or of Realty Income, as applicable, has concluded in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel) that failure to do so would reasonably be expected to result in a breach of its duties to VEREIT or Realty Income, as applicable, (D) four (4) Business Days (the “Notice Period”) shall have elapsed since the party proposing to take such action has given written notice to the other party advising such other party that the notifying party intends to take such action and specifying in reasonable detail the reasons therefor, including the terms and conditions of any such Superior Proposal that is the basis of the proposed action (a “Notice of Recommendation Change”) (it being understood that any amendment to any material term of such Superior Proposal shall require a new Notice of Recommendation Change and a new Notice Period, except that the four (4) Business Day Notice Period referred to in clause (D) above shall instead be equal to the longer of (1) three (3) Business Days or (2) the period remaining under the Notice Period under clause (D) above immediately prior to the delivery of such additional notice under this clause (D)), (E) during the Notice Period, the notifying party has considered and, at the reasonable request of the other party, engaged in good faith discussions with such party regarding, any adjustment or modification of the terms of this Agreement proposed by the other party, and (F) the Board of Directors of the party proposing to take such action, following the Notice Period, again reasonably determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel, and taking into account any adjustment or modification of the terms of this Agreement proposed by the other party) that failure to do so would reasonably be expected to result in a breach of its duties to such party. (Page 30)

Question: Definition includes asset deals-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Greater than 50% but not "all or substantially all"
Section 5.4            Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> 

(b) <omitted> (iv)         <omitted> the Board of Directors of VEREIT <omitted> may make a Change in VEREIT Recommendation <omitted> if and only if <omitted> (D) four (4) Business Days (the “Notice Period”) shall have elapsed since the party proposing to take such action has given written notice to the other party advising such other party that the notifying party intends to take such action <omitted> (it being understood that any amendment to any material term of such Superior Proposal shall require a new Notice of Recommendation Change and a new Notice Period, except that the four (4) Business Day Notice Period referred to in clause (D) above shall instead be equal to the longer of (1) three (3) Business Days or (2) the period remaining under the Notice Period under clause (D) above immediately prior to the delivery of such additional notice under this clause (D)) (Page 30)

Question: Definition includes asset deals-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Greater than 50% but not "all or substantially all"
the Board of Trust Managers of the Company may make a Change in Recommendation in connection with or relating to a Superior Proposal <omitted> , if and only if  <omitted> (x) the Company provides Parent with at least 96 hours written notice stating that the Company will effect a Change of Recommendation <omitted> ; provided, however, that any change to the financial terms or any other material changes to the terms and conditions of such Superior Proposal shall require a new written notice to be delivered by the Company to Parent and the Company shall be required to comply again with the requirements of this Section 5.4(b)(iv) (provided that references to the 96 hour period above shall be deemed to refer to a two Business Day period <omitted> in connection with the delivery of any such new notice), (y) during the period described in clause (x), the Company and its Representatives negotiate in good faith (to the extent that Parent desires to negotiate) to make any revisions to the terms of this Agreement as would permit the Board of Trust Managers of the Company not to effect a Change of Recommendation in connection with the Superior Proposal (Page 70)

Question: Definition includes asset deals-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Greater than 50% but not "all or substantially all"
Section 5.4 Non-Solicitation.
<omitted>

(b) <omitted> Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time prior to obtaining the East Stockholder Approval, and subject to East’s compliance in all material respects at all times with the provisions of this Section 5.4 and Section 5.3, in response to a Superior Proposal with respect to East that was not initiated, solicited, knowingly encouraged or knowingly facilitated by East or any of the East Subsidiaries or any of their respective Representatives, the East Board may make an East Adverse Recommendation Change; provided, however, that East shall not be entitled to exercise its right to make an East Adverse Recommendation Change in response to a Superior Proposal with respect to East (x) until three (3) Business Days after East provides written notice to Central (an “East Notice”) advising Central that the East Board or a committee thereof has received a Superior Proposal, specifying the material terms and conditions of such Superior Proposal, and identifying the Person or group making such Superior Proposal, (y) if during such three (3) Business Day period, Central proposes any alternative transaction (including any modifications to the terms of this Agreement), unless the East Board determines in good faith (after consultation with East’s financial advisors and outside legal counsel, and taking into account all financial, legal, and regulatory terms and conditions of such alternative transaction proposal, including any conditions to and expected timing of consummation, and any risks of non-consummation of such alternative transaction proposal) that such alternative transaction proposal is not at least as favorable to East and its stockholders as the Superior Proposal (it being understood that any change in the financial or other material terms of a Superior Proposal shall require a new East Notice and a new two (2) Business Day period under this Section 5.4(b)) and (z) unless the East Board, after consultation with outside legal counsel, determines that the failure to make an East Adverse Recommendation Change would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties. (Page 76)

Question: Definition includes asset deals-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: "All or substantially all"
Section 5.4 Non-Solicitation.
<omitted>

(b) <omitted> in response to a Superior Proposal with respect to East that was not initiated, solicited, knowingly encouraged or knowingly facilitated by East or any of the East Subsidiaries or any of their respective Representatives, the East Board may make an East Adverse Recommendation Change; provided, however, that East shall not be entitled to exercise its right to make an East Adverse Recommendation Change in response to a Superior Proposal with respect to East (x) until three (3) Business Days after East provides written notice to Central <omitted> (it being understood that any change in the financial or other material terms of a Superior Proposal shall require a new East Notice and a new two (2) Business Day period under this Section 5.4(b)) (Page 76)

Question: Definition includes asset deals-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: "All or substantially all"
For purposes of this Agreement, a “Company Superior Proposal” means any bona fide written proposal (on its most recently amended or modified terms, if amended or modified) made by a Company Third Party after the date of this Agreement to enter into a Company Alternative Transaction (with all references to 20% in the definition of Company Alternative Transaction being treated as references to 50% for these purposes) that (A) did not result from a breach of this Section 6.3 (other than any breach that is immaterial in scope and effect), (B) is on terms that the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel) to be superior from a financial point of view to the Company’s stockholders than the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, taking into account any changes to this Agreement that may be proposed by Parent in response to such proposal to enter into a Company Alternative Transaction, the identity of the person making such proposal to enter into a Company Alternative Transaction and such other factors as the Company Board considers to be appropriate or relevant, including the timing, likelihood of consummation, financial, regulatory, legal and other aspects of such proposal, and (C) is reasonably likely to be completed in accordance with its terms, taking into account all financial, regulatory, legal and other aspects of such proposal, and is not subject to a diligence or financing condition.  (Page 48)

Question: "Financial point of view" is the sole consideration
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: No
“Superior Proposal” means any bona fide written offer made by a third party (not made as a result of a breach of Section 6.2) after the date of this Agreement that, if consummated, would result in such third party (or its stockholders) owning, directly or indirectly, a majority of the outstanding Shares (or of the stock of the surviving entity in a merger or the direct or indirect parent of the surviving entity in a merger) or a majority of the assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, which the Company’s board of directors determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors) to be (i) more favorable to the holders of Shares from a financial point of view than the Merger (taking into account all of the terms and conditions of, such proposal and this Agreement (including, if applicable at the time of such determination, any changes to the financial terms of this Agreement then proposed by Parent in response to such offer or otherwise)) and (ii) reasonably likely to be completed, taking into account all financial, legal, regulatory and other aspects of such proposal.  (Page 55)

Question: "Financial point of view" is the sole consideration
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: No
“Superior Proposal” means any bona fide written Acquisition Proposal on terms which the Premier Financial Board determines in good faith, after consultation with Premier Financial’s outside legal counsel and independent financial advisors, and taking into account all the legal, financial, regulatory and other aspects of such Acquisition Proposal, including as to certainty and timing of consummation, would, if consummated, result in a transaction that is more favorable to the holders of Premier Financial Common Stock from a financial point of view than the terms of this Agreement (in each case, taking into account any revisions to this Agreement made or proposed by Peoples); provided that for purposes of the definition of “Superior Proposal,” the references to “20% or more” in the definition of Acquisition Proposal or Acquisition Transaction shall be deemed to be references to “50% or more.”  (Page 55)

Question: "Financial point of view" is the sole consideration
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: No
“Acquisition Proposal” means any proposal, offer, or indication of interest from any Person or group(as defined in or under Section13 of the Exchange Act), other than Parent or its Subsidiaries, (i) with respect to a merger, sale, license, joint venture, partnership, consolidation, dissolution, liquidation, tender offer, recapitalization, reorganization, share exchange, business combination or similar transaction or (ii)any other direct or indirect acquisition, in the case of clause (i)or (ii), involving 15% or more of the total voting power or of any class of equity securities  of  the  Company,  or  15%  or  more  of  the  consolidated  total  assets  (including  equity securities  of  its  Subsidiaries),  consolidated  revenues  or consolidated net income of the Company, in each case other than the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. <omitted> 

(j) For purposes of this Agreement, “Superior Proposal” means a bona fide written Acquisition Proposal from any Person or group (as defined in or under Section13 of the Exchange Act) made after the date of this Agreement that is not preceded by a breach of Section 4.2 involving more than 50% of the consolidated total assets (including equity securities of its Subsidiaries), consolidated revenues or consolidated net income or the total voting power of any class of equity securities of the Company that the Company Board has determined in its good faith judgment (after consultation with its outside counsel and Financial Advisor) (i)would, if consummated, result in a transaction more favorable from a financial point of view to the stockholders of the Company (in their capacities as such) than the transaction contemplated by this Agreement, taking into account all relevant factors (including closing certainty, certainty of financing, the legal, financial, timing and regulatory aspects of the proposal, conditions to consummation and the identity of the party making the proposal) and (ii) is reasonably likely to be completed on the terms proposed. (Page 22)

Question: "Financial point of view" is the sole consideration
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: No
“Acquisition Proposal” means any offer, proposal or indication of interest from a Person (as such term is used in Section 6.3) (other than a proposal or offer by Parent or any Parent Subsidiary) at any time relating to any transaction or series of related transactions (other than theTransactions) involving: (a) any acquisition or purchase by any Person, directly or indirectly, of more than fifteen percent (15%) of any class of outstanding voting or equity securities of the Company (whether by voting power or number of shares), or any tender offer (including aself-tender offer) or exchange offer that, if consummated, would result in any Person beneficially owning more than fifteen percent (15%) of any class of outstanding voting or equity securities of the Company (whether by voting power or number of shares), (b) any merger,consolidation, share exchange, business combination, joint venture, recapitalization, reorganization or other similar transaction involving theCompany (or any of the Company Subsidiaries) and a Person pursuant to which the Company Stockholders immediately preceding such transaction hold less than eighty-five percent (85%) of the equity interests in the surviving or resulting entity of such transaction (whether byvoting power or number of shares) or (c) any sale, lease, exchange, spin-off,transfer or other disposition to a Person of more than fifteen percent (15%) of the consolidated assets of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries, in the aggregate (measured by the fair market valuethereof and including equity interests of any Company Subsidiaries). <omitted> 
“Superior Proposal” means a bona fide, written Acquisition Proposal (with references in the definition thereof to fifteen percent (15%) and eighty-five percent (85%) being deemed to be replaced with references to eighty percent (80%) and twenty percent (20%), respectively) made in writing, after the date hereof, by a third party (other than Parent and Merger Sub), which the Company Board of Directors determines in good faith after consultation with the Company’s outside legal and financial advisors, taking into account all financial, legal, regulatory and other aspects of such Acquisition Proposal is (a) reasonably likely to be completed on the terms proposed and (b) taking into account, if applicable, any changes to the terms of this Agreement proposed by Parent pursuant to Section 6.3, is more favorable to the Company Stockholders from a financial point of view than the Merger. (Page 15)

Question: "Financial point of view" is the sole consideration
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: No