Sansaboo/maud huggingface dataset:
Section 5.14 No Solicitation; Change of Recommendation. <omitted> 

Section 7.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective Time: <omitted> (f) by: 

(1) KTYB if, (i) the Board of Directors of KTYB (or a duly authorized committee thereof) has authorized KTYB to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal, (ii) KTYB has complied in all respects with Section 5.14 and (iii) in the case of clause (i), immediately after the termination of this Agreement, KTYB enters into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal referred to in the foregoing clause (i); provided that the right of KTYB to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 7.1(f)(1) is conditioned on and subject to the prior payment by KTYB to SYBT of the Termination Fee in accordance with Section 7.2(b), and any purported termination pursuant to this Section 7.1(f)(1) shall be void and of no force or effect if KTYB shall not have paid and SYBT shall not have received the Termination Fee; or (Page 52)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Any breach of no-shop
Section 6.04. No Solicitation; Other Offers. <omitted> (ii) subject to compliance with ​Section 6.04(d), the Board of Directors may, (A) in response to its receipt of a bona fide unsolicited written Acquisition Proposal <omitted> and that the Board of Directors has determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor, constitutes a Superior Proposal, make an Adverse Recommendation Change or terminate this Agreement pursuant to and in accordance with ​Section 10.01(d)(i) in order to enter into a definitive agreement for a Superior Proposal, 

Section 10.01.Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time (notwithstanding any approval of this Agreement by the stockholders of the Company): <omitted> 
(d)            by the Company, if:   (i)            prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, the Board of Directors authorizes the Company to enter into a written agreement concerning a Superior Proposal, provided that the Company is not in material breach of any of the terms of this Agreement, provided that concurrently with such termination, the Company pays to Parent (or its designee) the Termination Fee payable pursuant to ​​Section 11.04 and enters into the Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal; (Page 34)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
Section 5.2 Company Acquisition Proposals. <omitted>
(b) Except as provided in Section 5.2(c), the Company and its Subsidiaries shall not, and the Company shall cause the directors and officers of the Company not to and shall direct their respective other Representatives not to, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage or knowingly induce  or  facilitate  the making,  submission  or  announcement  of  any  inquiries  or  the  making  of  any  proposal  or  offer  constituting  or  related  to  a  CompanyAcquisition Proposal, 

<omitted>

Section 7.1        Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, as follows (with any termination by Parent also being an effective termination by Merger Sub): <omitted> 
(d) by the Company:
<omitted>

(ii)             prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, in order to enter into a definitive agreement to effect a Company Superior Proposal, if the Company has complied with Section 5.2 (including Section 5.2(f)) in all material respects and enters into such definitive agreement concurrently with such termination and pays the Termination Fee in accordance with the procedures and within the time periods set forth in Section 7.3(a).  (Page 66)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 5.10    Acquisition Proposals. (a)    The Company will immediately cease and cause to be terminated any activities, discussions or negotiations with any Persons other than Nicolet  with  respect  to  any  Acquisition  Proposal  and  will  use  its reasonable  best  efforts  to  enforce  any  confidentiality  or  similar agreement  relating  to  an Acquisition  Proposal. <omitted>
(b)    <omitted> provided that, in the event the Company receives an unsolicited bona fide Acquisition Proposal, from a Person other than Nicolet, after the execution of this Agreement and prior to the receipt of the Company Shareholder Approval, and the Company Board concludes in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisor and outside counsel, that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal or could reasonably be likely to result in a Superior Proposal and, after considering the advice of outside counsel, that failure to take such actions could be reasonably likely to result in a violation of the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable law, the Company may: (i) furnish information with respect to it to such Person making such Acquisition Proposal pursuant to a customary confidentiality agreement (subject to the requirement that any such information not previously provided to Nicolet shall be promptly furnished to Nicolet); (ii) participate in discussions or negotiations regarding such Acquisition Proposal; and (iii) terminate this Agreement in order to concurrently enter into an agreement with respect to such Acquisition Proposal; provided, however, that the Company may not terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 5.10 unless and until (x) five (5) Business Days have elapsed following the delivery to Nicolet of a written notice of such determination by the Company Board and, during such five (5) Business-Day period, the parties cooperate with one another with the intent of enabling the parties to engage in good faith negotiations so that the Contemplated Transactions may be effected, and (y) at the end of such five (5) Business-Day period, the Company Board continues, in good faith and after consultation with outside legal counsel and financial advisors, to believe that a Superior Proposal continues to exist.  (Page 41)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Any breach of no-shop
6.1 No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, at any time prior to the receipt of  the  Required  Company  Stockholder  Approval,  but  not  after,  the  Company Board  (upon  the  recommendation  of  the Company  Special  Committee)  shall be permitted, so long as the Company is not in material violation of this Section 6.02 and subject  to  compliance  with Section  6.02(d), (x)  to  terminate  this  Agreement  to  concurrently  enter  into  a  definitive Alternative Acquisition  Agreement  with  respect  to  a  Superior  Proposal pursuant  to  Section  8.01(h) <omitted>

8.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated only pursuant to this Section 8.1. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned, whether before or after the Company Stockholder Approval (except as otherwise expressly noted) or the approval of the adoption of this Agreement by the sole stockholder of Merger Sub (with respect to Sections 8.1(b) 63 through 8.1(l), by written notice by the terminating party to the other party specifying the provisions of this Agreement pursuant to which such termination is effected): <omitted> 
(f) by the Company at any time prior to receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, in the event that: (i) the Company shall have received a Superior Proposal, (ii) the Company shall have complied with its obligations under Section 6.1(d) and (iii) substantially concurrently with the termination of this Agreement, and as a condition to the effectiveness of such termination, the Company pays (or causes to be paid) to Parent the Company Termination Fee contemplated by Section 8.3(b)(iii) and the Company enters into the definitive agreement to consummate the transaction contemplated by such Superior Proposal; (Page 69)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 5.2 No Solicitation; Recommendations. <omitted> (ii) “Superior Proposal” means, with respect to Parent or the Company, any bona fide written Acquisition Proposal <omitted> that the Parent Board or the Company Board (as applicable) determines in good faith (after consultation with outside counsel and its financial advisor), taking into account all legal, financial, regulatory and other aspects of the proposal, including the terms of any financing or financing contingencies and the likely timing of closing, and the Person making the proposal, (A) is more favorable to the stockholders of such Party from a financial point of view than the Transactions (including any adjustment to the terms and conditions proposed by the other Party in response to such proposal) and (B) would reasonably be expected to be completed on the terms proposed; provided, that, for purposes of this definition of “Superior Proposal,” references in the term “Acquisition Proposal” to “20% or more” shall be deemed to be references to “50% or more” <omitted> Section 7.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Mergers may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after the Parent Stockholder Approval or the Company Stockholder Approval has been obtained (with any termination byParent or the Company also being an effective termination by the other Parent Parties or the other Company Parties, respectively): <omitted> (e) by the Company, prior to, but not after, the time the Company Stockholder Approval is obtained, in order to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal; provided, however, provided that the Company is not in material breach of any of the terms of this Agreementthat, the Company shall have contemporaneously with such termination tendered payment to Parent of the Company Termination Fee pursuant to Section 7.3.  (Page 102)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
4.3. No Solicitation. <omitted> 
7.1.Termination. This Agreement may be terminated, and the Merger and the other Transactions may be abandoned, at any time prior to the Effective Time, as follows (with any termination by Parent also being an effective termination by Merger Sub): <omitted> 
(h) by the Company, at any time prior to the receipt of the Company Required Vote, in order to accept a Superior Offer and enter into a binding written definitive acquisition agreement providing for the consummation of a transaction constituting a Superior Offer (a “Specified Agreement”) if (i) the Company has complied with the requirements of Section 4.3 and Section 5.1(b)(i) with respect to such Superior Offer (other than any non-compliance that was both immaterial and unintentional); (ii) the Company Board (or any committee thereof), as permitted by Section 5.1(b), has authorized the Company to enter into a Specified Agreement to consummate the Superior Offer, (iii) prior to or substantially concurrently with the termination of this Agreement the Company pays the Company Termination Fee due to Parent in accordance with Section 7.3(b) and (iv) substantially concurrently with such termination, the Company enters into a Specified Agreement to consummate such Superior Offer; or (Page 64)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 6.3          No Solicitation of Transactions.(a)          From the date of this Agreement until the earlier of the Effective Time and the valid termination of this Agreement in accordance with Section  8.1,  except  as  otherwise  set  forth  in  this Section  6.3,  the  Company  shall  not,  and  shall  cause  the  Company  Subsidiaries  and  Representatives  of  theCompany not to, and shall not authorize or permit the Representatives of the Company to, directly or indirectly: (i)            initiate, solicit, cooperate with, assist, participate in or knowingly take any action to encourage, induce or facilitate (including by way of providing non-public information relating to the Company or Company Subsidiaries or affording access to the business or properties of theCompany) the making, submission or announcement of any Acquisition Proposal; <omitted> Section 8.1            Termination.  This Agreement  may  be  terminated,  and  the  Merger  contemplated  hereby  may be  abandoned,  by  action  taken  or authorized by the board of directors of the terminating party or parties: <omitted> (d) by the Company (i)            at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval if the Company Board determines to accept a Superior Proposal, but only if the Company shall have complied in all material respects with its obligations under Section 6.3 and is otherwise permitted to accept such Superior Proposal pursuant to Section 6.3(d); provided, however, that such termination shall not be effective unless the Company shall concurrently with such termination enter into the Alternative Acquisition Agreement and pay the Company Termination Fee to Parent;  (Page 50)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 6.4           Acquisition Proposals. <omitted> (b)         Notwithstanding the foregoing in this Section 6.4, prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company Board (or a committee thereof), directly or indirectly through any Representative, may <omitted> : (i) participate in negotiations or discussions with any third party, that has made (and not withdrawn) a bona fide Alternative Proposal in writing that was not solicited in violation of Section 6.4(a) that the Company Board(or a committee thereof) believes in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and its financial advisor, constitutes or could reasonably be expected to result in a Superior  Proposal; <omitted> ; (iii) following receipt of and on account of a Superior Proposal <omitted> terminate this Agreement pursuant to and in accordance with Section 8.3(a); <omitted> 

Section 8.3          Termination by the Company. This Agreement may be terminated by the Company at any time prior to the Effective Time:   (a)        if prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval at the Company Stockholders Meeting, the Company Board (or a committee thereof) authorizes the Company, in accordance with Section 6.4, to terminate this Agreement and enter into a Company Acquisition Agreement in respect of a Superior Proposal; provided, that in the event of such termination, the Company substantially concurrently enters into such Company Acquisition Agreement; provided, further, that the Company may only terminate the Agreement pursuant to this Section 8.3(a) if it has paid to Parent the Termination Fee pursuant to Section 8.6(a)(ii); (Page 67)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
9.1         Termination.  This Agreement may be terminated, and the Mergers and the other transactions contemplated hereby may be abandoned, at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after stockholder adoption thereof: <omitted> (c)          by the Company or Hospitality, by written notice to Parent, <omitted> (i)          at any time prior to the time the Requisite Vote is obtained, (A) if after complying with Section 7.5(b) in connection with a Superior Proposal, both the Company Board and the Hospitality Board have authorized the Paired Entities to enter into a definitive written agreement providing for the implementation of a Superior Proposal that did not result from a breach of Section 7.5, (B) the Company and Hospitality enter into a definitive written agreement providing for such Superior Proposal concurrently with or immediately after the termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms and (C) the Paired Entities, prior to or concurrently with, such termination, pay to Parent (or its designee) the Termination Fee in accordance with Section 9.2(b)(i);  (Page 79)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
SECTION 9.1. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Transactions may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time: <omitted> (d) by the Company by written notice to Parent at any time prior to the Acceptance Time: (i) in order to accept a Superior Proposal and enter into the Specified Agreement relating to such Superior Proposal, if (1) such Superior Proposal shall not have resulted from any breach of Section 7.8 with respect to such Superior Proposal and any Acquisition Proposal that was a precursor thereto, (2) the Company Board, after satisfying all of the requirements set forth in Section 7.8(d), shall have authorized the Company to enter into a binding written definitive acquisition agreement providing for the consummation of a transaction constituting a Superior Proposal (a “Specified Agreement”) and (3) the Company shall have paid the Termination Fee, and have entered into the Specified Agreement, concurrently with the termination of this Agreement pursuant to this Section 9.1(d)(i);  (Page 84)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 5.3          Acquisition Proposals. 
<omitted> 
(e)          Change of Recommendation / Superior Proposal Termination.  Notwith-standing anything to the contrary in this Agreement, at any time prior to the time the Company Stockholder Approval is obtained, (x) the Company Board may make a Change of Recommendation (1) if the Company receives a bona fide unsolicited Acquisition Proposal following the Agreement Date that did not result from a violation of Section 5.3 and the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with the Company’s outside legal and financial advisors) based on the information then available that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal or (2) in response to a Company Intervening Event, in either case of (1) or (2), only if the Company Board determines in good faith that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law and (y) if the Company Board is permitted to make a Change of Recommendation pursuant to clause (x)(1), the Company may also terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1 to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to the applicable Superior Proposal; provided, however, that neither the Company Board or the Company shall take any of the foregoing actions unless: 
<omitted> 
Section 7.1          Termination.  This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval (except as provided herein), only as follows: 
<omitted> 
(f)          by the Company, at any time prior to the time the Company Stockholder Approval is obtained, if (i) the Company Board authorizes the Company, subject to complying in all material respects with the terms of Section 5.3, to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal; and (ii) the Company pays to Parent the Company Termination Fee in accordance with Section 7.4(a); or (Page 60)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 5.2. Go-Shop; Acquisition Proposals. 
<omitted> 
(c) 
<omitted> 
Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, prior to the time the Stockholder Approval is obtained, the Company Board may (x) effect a Change of Recommendation contemplated by clauses (1) or (2) of the definition thereof if, upon the occurrence of an Intervening Event, the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that failure to do so would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary obligations under applicable Law or (y) if the Company receives, directly or indirectly through one or more of its Representatives, a written, bona fide Acquisition Proposal that the Company Board concludes in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel, constitutes a Superior Proposal and such Acquisition Proposal did not result from a breach of this Section 5.2, effect a Change of Recommendation and/or terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.3(a) in order to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement providing for such Superior Proposal, and, in the case of either clause (x) or (y): 
<omitted> 
Section 7.3. Termination by the Company. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned by the Company: (a) at any time prior to the time the Stockholder Approval is obtained, in order to concurrently enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement providing for a Superior Proposal in accordance with, and subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of, Section 5.2(c); provided, that prior to or concurrently with, and as a condition to, such termination, the Company pays to Parent the Company Termination Fee due under Section 7.5(b);  (Page 70)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
6.3           No Solicitation by the Company.   <omitted> 
  (b)           <omitted> the Company will not <omitted>  initiate, solicit or knowingly encourage the making of a Company Competing Proposal  <omitted>  (d) <omitted> the Company <omitted>  may:  <omitted>
  (iii)  <omitted> in response to a <omitted> Company Competing Proposal from a third party that was not solicited at any time following the execution of this Agreement and did not arise from a material breach of the obligations set forth in this Section 6.3 <omitted> cause the Company to <omitted> terminate this Agreement  <omitted>  8.1     Termination. This Agreement may be terminated   <omitted>  (d)   by the Company: (i)    <omitted> if the Company has complied in all material respects with Section 6.3(b) and Section 6.3(d)(iii) in respect of such Company Superior Proposal, the Company Board <omitted> determines to terminate this Agreement <omitted> in connection with a Company Superior Proposal (Page 33)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
6.3 Stockholders’ Approvals.
 <omitted>
 
 (b) <omitted> the Board of Directors of CIT may cause CIT to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(f) <omitted> if, but only if, (1) <omitted> CIT <omitted> have complied in all material respects with Section 6.12
 <omitted>
 
 6.12 Acquisition Proposals. (Page 58)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Material breach of no-shop