Sansaboo/maud huggingface dataset:
Section 7.2 Company Acquisition Proposals. <omitted>
(e) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement but subject to Section 7.2(f), prior to the time the Company Stockholder Approval is obtained, the Company Board may effect a Company Adverse Recommendation Change (and, in the case of a Company Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a breach of this Section 7.2, terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.1(d)(ii) and concurrently pay the fees required by Section 9.3 in order to enter into a definitive agreement in connection with a Superior Proposal) if: (i) (A) a bona fide written Company Acquisition Proposal is made to the Company after the date of this Agreement that did not result from a breach of this Section 7.2 and such Company Acquisition Proposal is not withdrawn prior to such Company Adverse Recommendation Change or (B) there has been an Intervening Event; (ii) in the case of a Company Acquisition Proposal, the Company Board concludes in good faith, after consultation with the Company’s outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that (x) such Company Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal and (y) failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Laws; and (iii) in the case of an Intervening Event, the Company Board concludes in good faith, after consultation with the Company’s outside legal counsel, that failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Laws. (Page 75)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Any breach of no-shop
Section 7.2 Company Acquisition Proposals. <omitted>
(e) the Company Board may <omitted> in the case of a Company Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a breach of this Section 7.2, terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.1(d)(ii) <omitted> in order to enter into a definitive agreement in connection with a Superior Proposal) (Page 75)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Any breach of no-shop
9.1         Termination.  This Agreement may be terminated, and the Mergers and the other transactions contemplated hereby may be abandoned, at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after stockholder adoption thereof: <omitted> (c)          by the Company or Hospitality, by written notice to Parent, <omitted> (i)          at any time prior to the time the Requisite Vote is obtained, (A) if after complying with Section 7.5(b) in connection with a Superior Proposal, both the Company Board and the Hospitality Board have authorized the Paired Entities to enter into a definitive written agreement providing for the implementation of a Superior Proposal that did not result from a breach of Section 7.5, (B) the Company and Hospitality enter into a definitive written agreement providing for such Superior Proposal concurrently with or immediately after the termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms and (C) the Paired Entities, prior to or concurrently with, such termination, pay to Parent (or its designee) the Termination Fee in accordance with Section 9.2(b)(i); (Page 79)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
9.1         Termination.  This Agreement may be terminated, and the Mergers and the other transactions contemplated hereby may be abandoned, at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after stockholder adoption thereof: <omitted> (c)          by the Company or Hospitality, by written notice to Parent, <omitted> (i)         <omitted> (A) if after complying with Section 7.5(b) in connection with a Superior Proposal, both the Company Board and the Hospitality Board have authorized the Paired Entities to enter into a definitive written agreement providing for the implementation of a Superior Proposal that did not result from a breach of Section 7.5 (Page 79)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 6.02       No Solicitation; Adverse Recommendation Change.(a)               <omitted> from the date of this Agreement until the earlier of the Effective Time or the termination of this Agreement in accordance with Section 9.01, the Company shall <omitted> (ii)              to not (A) solicit <omitted>(d)               The Company Board shall not be entitled to <omitted> terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.01(h) unless <omitted>  (i)              (A) an Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a breach of Section 6.01(a) (other than a breach that is immaterial and unintentional) is made to the Company by a Third Party <omitted> (B) the Company Board determines <omitted> that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes, or could reasonably be expected to lead to, a Superior Proposal (Pages 27-28)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Other
Section 5.10    Acquisition Proposals. (a)    The Company will immediately cease and cause to be terminated any activities, discussions or negotiations with any Persons other than Nicolet  with  respect  to  any  Acquisition  Proposal  and  will  use  its reasonable  best  efforts  to  enforce  any  confidentiality  or  similar agreement  relating  to  an Acquisition  Proposal. <omitted>
(b)    <omitted> provided that, in the event the Company receives an unsolicited bona fide Acquisition Proposal, from a Person other than Nicolet, after the execution of this Agreement and prior to the receipt of the Company Shareholder Approval, and the Company Board concludes in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisor and outside counsel, that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal or could reasonably be likely to result in a Superior Proposal and, after considering the advice of outside counsel, that failure to take such actions could be reasonably likely to result in a violation of the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable law, the Company may: (i) furnish information with respect to it to such Person making such Acquisition Proposal pursuant to a customary confidentiality agreement (subject to the requirement that any such information not previously provided to Nicolet shall be promptly furnished to Nicolet); (ii) participate in discussions or negotiations regarding such Acquisition Proposal; and (iii) terminate this Agreement in order to concurrently enter into an agreement with respect to such Acquisition Proposal; provided, however, that the Company may not terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 5.10 unless and until (x) five (5) Business Days have elapsed following the delivery to Nicolet of a written notice of such determination by the Company Board and, during such five (5) Business-Day period, the parties cooperate with one another with the intent of enabling the parties to engage in good faith negotiations so that the Contemplated Transactions may be effected, and (y) at the end of such five (5) Business-Day period, the Company Board continues, in good faith and after consultation with outside legal counsel and financial advisors, to believe that a Superior Proposal continues to exist. (Page 41)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Any breach of no-shop
Section 5.10    Acquisition Proposals. (a)    The Company will immediately cease <omitted> any activities <omitted> with  respect  to  any  Acquisition  Proposal 
(b)    <omitted> provided that, <omitted> that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal or could reasonably be likely to result in a Superior Proposal <omitted> the Company may: <omitted> (iii) terminate this Agreement in order to concurrently enter into an agreement with respect to such Acquisition Proposal; (Page 41)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Any breach of no-shop
Section 5.2 Company Acquisition Proposals. <omitted>
(b) Except as provided in Section 5.2(c), the Company and its Subsidiaries shall not, and the Company shall cause the directors and officers of the Company not to and shall direct their respective other Representatives not to, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage or knowingly induce  or  facilitate  the making,  submission  or  announcement  of  any  inquiries  or  the  making  of  any  proposal  or  offer  constituting  or  related  to  a  CompanyAcquisition Proposal, 

<omitted>

Section 7.1        Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, as follows (with any termination by Parent also being an effective termination by Merger Sub): <omitted> 
(d) by the Company:
<omitted>

(ii)             prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, in order to enter into a definitive agreement to effect a Company Superior Proposal, if the Company has complied with Section 5.2 (including Section 5.2(f)) in all material respects and enters into such definitive agreement concurrently with such termination and pays the Termination Fee in accordance with the procedures and within the time periods set forth in Section 7.3(a). (Page 66)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 5.2 Company Acquisition Proposals. <omitted>
(b) <omitted> the Company and its Subsidiaries shall not, and the Company shall cause the directors and officers of the Company not to and shall direct their respective other Representatives not to, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage or knowingly induce  or  facilitate  the making,  submission  or  announcement  of  any  inquiries  or  the  making  of  any  proposal  or  offer  constituting  or  related  to  a  CompanyAcquisition Proposal

<omitted>

Section 7.1        Termination. This Agreement may be terminated <omitted> : <omitted> 
(d) by the Company:
<omitted>

(ii) <omitted> in order to enter into a definitive agreement to effect a Company Superior Proposal, if the Company has complied with Section 5.2 (including Section 5.2(f)) in all material respects (Page 66)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 5.2. Go-Shop; Acquisition Proposals. 
<omitted> 
(c) 
<omitted> 
Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, prior to the time the Stockholder Approval is obtained, the Company Board may (x) effect a Change of Recommendation contemplated by clauses (1) or (2) of the definition thereof if, upon the occurrence of an Intervening Event, the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that failure to do so would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary obligations under applicable Law or (y) if the Company receives, directly or indirectly through one or more of its Representatives, a written, bona fide Acquisition Proposal that the Company Board concludes in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel, constitutes a Superior Proposal and such Acquisition Proposal did not result from a breach of this Section 5.2, effect a Change of Recommendation and/or terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.3(a) in order to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement providing for such Superior Proposal, and, in the case of either clause (x) or (y): 
<omitted> 
Section 7.3. Termination by the Company. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned by the Company: (a) at any time prior to the time the Stockholder Approval is obtained, in order to concurrently enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement providing for a Superior Proposal in accordance with, and subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of, Section 5.2(c); provided, that prior to or concurrently with, and as a condition to, such termination, the Company pays to Parent the Company Termination Fee due under Section 7.5(b); (Page 70)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 5.2. Go-Shop; Acquisition Proposals. 
<omitted> (c) <omitted> the Company Board may <omitted> (y) if the Company receives, directly or indirectly through one or more of its Representatives, a   <omitted> Acquisition Proposal that the Company Board concludes in good faith <omitted> constitutes a Superior Proposal and such Acquisition Proposal did not result from a breach of this Section 5.2, <omitted> terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.3(a) in order to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement providing for such Superior Proposal,  
<omitted> 
Section 7.3. Termination by the Company. This Agreement may be terminated <omitted> : (a) <omitted> in order to concurrently enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement providing for a Superior Proposal in accordance with, and subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of, Section 5.2(c); (Page 70)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
SECTION 9.1. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Transactions may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time: <omitted> (d) by the Company by written notice to Parent at any time prior to the Acceptance Time: (i) in order to accept a Superior Proposal and enter into the Specified Agreement relating to such Superior Proposal, if (1) such Superior Proposal shall not have resulted from any breach of Section 7.8 with respect to such Superior Proposal and any Acquisition Proposal that was a precursor thereto, (2) the Company Board, after satisfying all of the requirements set forth in Section 7.8(d), shall have authorized the Company to enter into a binding written definitive acquisition agreement providing for the consummation of a transaction constituting a Superior Proposal (a “Specified Agreement”) and (3) the Company shall have paid the Termination Fee, and have entered into the Specified Agreement, concurrently with the termination of this Agreement pursuant to this Section 9.1(d)(i); (Page 84)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
SECTION 9.1. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated <omitted> (d) by the Company <omitted> (i) in order to accept a Superior Proposal <omitted> if (1) such Superior Proposal shall not have resulted from any breach of Section 7.8 with respect to such Superior Proposal (Page 84)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
4.2 Company No Solicitation. <omitted>
4.4 Meeting of the Company’s Stockholders; Company Change in Recommendation. <omitted>
6.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned: <omitted>
(e) by the Company, at any time prior to obtaining the Required Company Stockholder Vote, in the event that (i) the Company Board shall have authorized the Company to enter into a definitive agreement relating to a Company Superior Proposal; (ii) concurrently with the termination of this Agreement, the Company enters into the definitive agreement relating to a Company Superior Proposal and pays Parent the Termination Fee payable to Parent pursuant to Section 6.3(a); and (iii) the Company has not materially breached the provisions of Section 4.2 and Section 4.4; (Page 73) (Page 73)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Material breach of no-shop, (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
4.2 Company No Solicitation. <omitted>
4.4 Meeting of the Company’s Stockholders; Company Change in Recommendation. <omitted>
6.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned: <omitted>
(e) by the Company, at any time prior to obtaining the Required Company Stockholder Vote, in the event that (i) the Company Board shall have authorized the Company to enter into a definitive agreement relating to a Company Superior Proposal; <omitted> and (iii) the Company has not materially breached the provisions of Section 4.2 and Section 4.4; (Page 73) (Page 73)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Material breach of no-shop, (Material) breach of other provisions of agreement
SECTION 5.02.No Solicitation. (a) The Company shall not <omitted> solicit <omitted> any Acquisition Proposal <omitted> the Company may <omitted> (z) terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.01(f) in response to a Superior Proposal in order to enter into a definitive agreement providing for such Superior Proposal, but in each case only if: (1) the Company Board has received a Superior Proposal that did not result, directly or indirectly, from a breach of Section 5.02 (in the case of the preceding <omitted> clause (z)) <omitted> (Page 53)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 6.3          No Solicitation of Transactions.(a)          From the date of this Agreement until the earlier of the Effective Time and the valid termination of this Agreement in accordance with Section  8.1,  except  as  otherwise  set  forth  in  this Section  6.3,  the  Company  shall  not,  and  shall  cause  the  Company  Subsidiaries  and  Representatives  of  theCompany not to, and shall not authorize or permit the Representatives of the Company to, directly or indirectly: (i)            initiate, solicit, cooperate with, assist, participate in or knowingly take any action to encourage, induce or facilitate (including by way of providing non-public information relating to the Company or Company Subsidiaries or affording access to the business or properties of theCompany) the making, submission or announcement of any Acquisition Proposal; <omitted> Section 8.1            Termination.  This Agreement  may  be  terminated,  and  the  Merger  contemplated  hereby  may be  abandoned,  by  action  taken  or authorized by the board of directors of the terminating party or parties: <omitted> (d) by the Company (i)            at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval if the Company Board determines to accept a Superior Proposal, but only if the Company shall have complied in all material respects with its obligations under Section 6.3 and is otherwise permitted to accept such Superior Proposal pursuant to Section 6.3(d); provided, however, that such termination shall not be effective unless the Company shall concurrently with such termination enter into the Alternative Acquisition Agreement and pay the Company Termination Fee to Parent; (Page 50)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 6.3          No Solicitation of Transactions. <omitted> the  Company  shall  not <omitted> solicit <omitted> any Acquisition Proposal; <omitted> Section 8.1            Termination.  This Agreement  may  be  terminated <omitted> by the Company: <omitted> (i) <omitted> if the Company Board determines to accept a Superior Proposal, but only if the Company shall have complied in all material respects with its obligations under Section 6.3 and is otherwise permitted to accept such Superior Proposal pursuant to Section 6.3(d); (Page 50)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Answer: Material breach of no-shop
Section 6.03. No Solicitation. <omitted>
Section 10.01. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time (notwithstanding any approval of this Agreement by the stockholders of the Company): <omitted>
(d)    by the Company, if: <omitted>
(ii)    at any time prior to, but not after, the Company Stockholder Approval is obtained, the Company Board has made an Adverse Recommendation Change in order to accept a Superior Proposal and the Company concurrently enters into a binding written definitive acquisition agreement providing for the consummation of a transaction for a Superior Proposal; provided that (A) the Company and the Company Board shall have complied with Section 6.03 with respect to such Superior Proposal and (B) the Company shall have paid the Termination Fee immediately before or simultaneously with, and as a condition to, such termination.  (Page 76)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer
Section 7.03 No Solicitation; Other Offers. <omitted> (e) <omitted> (ii) in the case of an Adverse Recommendation Change to be made pursuant to a Superior Proposal, such Superior Proposal did not result from a material  breach  of  this Section 7.03 <omitted> 

Section 10.01 Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party. The obligations of the Company, Parent and Merger Sub to consummate the Merger are subject to the satisfaction or written waiver by all parties if permissible under Applicable Law of the following conditions: <omitted>
(d)            by the Company, prior to the Acceptance Time:   (i)            if the Board of Directors has made an Adverse Recommendation Change in order to accept a Superior Proposal and concurrently enter into a binding written definitive acquisition agreement providing for the consummation of a transaction for a Superior Proposal; provided that the Company shall have complied with the applicable provisions of Section 7.03(e) and shall have paid the Termination Fee to Parent in immediately available funds immediately before or simultaneously with and as a condition to such termination; (Page 36)

(d) by the Company, prior to the Acceptance Time: <omitted> provided that the Company shall have complied with the applicable provisions of Section 7.03(e) and shall have paid the Termination Fee to Parent in immediately available funds immediately before or simultaneously with and as a condition to such termination (Page 36)

Question: Limitations on FTR Exercise-Answer
Subquestion: Material breach of no-shop
Answer: Material breach of no-shop resulting in a Superior Offer