Sansaboo/maud huggingface dataset:
“Knowledge” of the Parent or the Company, as applicable means the actual knowledge, after reasonable internal inquiry and reasonable inquiry with external patent counsel, of the chief executive officer, the members of the executive leadership team or, solely with respect of the Company, the vice president of quality assurance and vice president of human resources.  (Page 68)

Question: Knowledge Definition limited to one or more identified persons-Answer (Y/
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Yes
“Knowledge” of the Company, with respect to any matter in question, means the actual knowledge of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer; Chief Financial Officer; Chief Revenue Officer; Chief Marketing Officer; Chief People Officer; Chief Technology Officer and Chief Legal Officer, in each case after reasonable inquiry of those employees who would reasonably be expected to have actual knowledge of the matter in question. With respect to matters involving Intellectual Property, Knowledge does not require the Company, or any of its directors, officer or employees, to have conducted or have obtained any freedom-to-operate opinions or any Patent, Mark or other Intellectual Property clearance searches, and if not conducted or obtained, no knowledge of any third Person Patents, Mark or other Intellectual Property that would have been revealed by such opinions or searches will be imputed to the Company or any of its directors, officers or employees.  (Page 14)

Question: Knowledge Definition limited to one or more identified persons-Answer (Y/
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Yes
“To the knowledge of the Company” and similar phrases mean (i) the actual knowledge of the officers and employees listed on Section 1.1(a) of the Company Disclosure Letter, after making reasonable inquiry, and (ii) all knowledge which was, or would reasonably have been expected to be, obtained by such Persons after such reasonable inquiry, which, for purposes of Section 5.17 shall include such actual knowledge after making due inquiry of the Company’s outside intellectual property counsel, but in no event shall any such inquiry for purposes of this definition require freedom to operate analysis, trademark clearance searches,   11


validity, noninfringement or any other similar analysis or opinions of counsel to be conducted if such analysis was not conducted prior to the date hereof.  (Pages 15-16)

Question: Knowledge Definition limited to one or more identified persons-Answer (Y/
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Yes
“knowledge” means the actual knowledge of the Persons listed in Section A of the Company Disclosure Letter with respect to the Company after making reasonable inquiry and all knowledge which was, or would reasonably have been expected to be, obtained by such Person after such reasonable inquiry, but in no event shall any such inquiry for purposes of this definition require freedom to operate analysis if such analysis was not conducted prior to the date hereof. (Page 35)

Question: Knowledge Definition limited to one or more identified persons-Answer (Y/
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Yes
“Knowledge” means, with respect to the Company, the actual knowledge of those individuals set forth in Section 1.01(a) of the Company Disclosure Letter after reasonable inquiry of such Person’s direct reports. With respect to Company Intellectual Property, “Knowledge” or “Known” includes reasonable inquiry of such Person’s direct reports but does not require the Company to conduct, have conducted, obtain, review or have reviewed any freedom to operate opinions or similar opinions of counsel. (Page 80)

Question: Knowledge Definition limited to one or more identified persons-Answer (Y/
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Yes
“Knowledge” means, with respect to (a) the Company as it relates to any fact or other matter, the actual knowledge of the natural Persons set forth in Section 1.01B of the Company Disclosure Letter of such fact or matter as of the date hereof, in each case, after reasonable inquiry, and <omitted>  provided that, in the case of the foregoing (a) and (b), for clarity, with respect to Intellectual Property, such inquiry is not required to include freedom to operate analyses, clearance searches, validity or noninfringement analyses or opinions, or any other similar analyses or opinions of counsel.  (Page 13)

Question: Knowledge Definition limited to one or more identified persons-Answer (Y/
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Yes
“knowledge” will be deemed to be, as the case may be, the actual knowledge of (a) the Persons listed in Section 9.5 of the Parent Disclosure Letter with respect to Parent, US Holdco or Crystal Merger Sub, or (b) the Persons listed in Section 9.5 of the Company Disclosure Letter with respect to the Company.  (Page 42)

Question: Knowledge Definition limited to one or more identified persons-Answer (Y/
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Yes
“Knowledge” means (a) with respect to the Company, the actual knowledge in each case after reasonable inquiry of each individual listed in Section 1.1(b) of the Company Disclosure Letter and (b) with respect to Parent, the actual knowledge in each case after reasonable inquiry of each individual listed in Section 1.1(b) of the Parent Disclosure Letter.  (Page 13)

Question: Knowledge Definition limited to one or more identified persons-Answer (Y/
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Yes
“Knowledge” of a Person, with respect to any matter in question, means (i) with respect to the Company, the actual knowledge of the individuals set forth on Section 1.1(ddd) of the Company Disclosure Letter; and (ii) with respect to Parent, the actual knowledge of the individuals set forth on Section 1.1(ddd) of the Parent Disclosure Letter, in each case after reasonable inquiry of those employees who would reasonably be expected to have actual knowledge of the matter in question. With respect to matters involving Intellectual Property of the Company, Knowledge does not require the Company, or any of its directors, officers or employees, to have conducted or have obtained any freedom to operate opinions of any patent or any Mark or other Intellectual Property clearance searches, and if not conducted or obtained, no knowledge of any patents, Marks or other Intellectual Property of any third Person that would have been revealed by such opinions or searches will be imputed to the Company or any of its directors, officers or employees.  (Page 14)

Question: Knowledge Definition limited to one or more identified persons-Answer (Y/
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Yes
“Knowledge” means <omitted> (ii) with respect to the Company, the actual knowledge (without independent inquiry or investigation) of any one or more of the persons identified on Section 10.2(iii)(a) of the Company Disclosure Letter; provided that Knowledge of the Company with respect to any Joint Ventures of the Company shall be the actual knowledge (without independent inquiry or investigation) of any one or more of the persons identified on Section 10.2(iii)(a) or Section 10.2(iii)(b) of the Company Disclosure Letter; provided further, that Knowledge of the Company for purposes of Section 5.2(c) of this Agreement shall be limited to the actual knowledge (without independent inquiry or investigation) of any one or more of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, interim Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel.  (Page 81)

Question: Knowledge Definition limited to one or more identified persons-Answer (Y/
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Yes
“Representatives” means, with respect to any Person, such Person’s directors, officers, agents, control persons, employees, consultants and professional advisors (including attorneys, accountants and financial advisors). 
<omitted> 
Section 7.2 No Solicitation. (a) From and after the date of this Agreement until the earlier to occur of the Effective Time and the termination of this Agreement in accordance with Article IX, and except as otherwise specifically provided for in this Section 7.2, 
<omitted> 
(ii) the Company shall not, and shall cause each of its Subsidiaries and its and their respective directors, officers and employees not to, and shall not permit its and their respective other Representatives to, directly or indirectly, (A) solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage any Company Acquisition Proposal or any inquiry, proposal or offer which constitutes, or could reasonably be expected to lead to, a Company Acquisition Proposal, (B) participate in any negotiations or discussions regarding, or furnish to any Person (other than Parent, its Affiliates and their respective Representatives) any nonpublic information relating to the Company and its Subsidiaries, or provide access to the properties or personnel of the Company and its Subsidiaries, in each case, in connection with any Company Acquisition Proposal or any inquiry, proposal or offer which constitutes, or could reasonably be expected to lead to, a Company Acquisition Proposal, (C) approve or recommend, or make any public statement approving or recommending, a Company Acquisition Proposal or any proposal or offer which constitutes, or could reasonably be expected to lead to, a Company Acquisition Proposal, (D) grant any waiver, amendment or release under any “standstill” or confidentiality agreement (unless the Company Board has determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law), (E) approve or execute or enter into any letter of intent, memorandum of understanding, agreement in principle, merger agreement, acquisition agreement or other similar agreement that constitutes a Company Acquisition Proposal or any proposal or offer which could reasonably be expected to lead to a Company Acquisition Proposal (other than an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement entered into in accordance with Section 7.2(b)) (each an “Alternative Acquisition Agreement”), (F) submit any Company Acquisition Proposal to a vote of the stockholders of the Company or (G) resolve or agree to do any of the foregoing. (Page 67)

Question: Liability for breaches of no-shop by Target Representatives (Y/N)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: No
Section 6.3 No Solicitation. (a) Except as permitted by this Section 6.3, during the Pre-Closing Period, the Company shall not, and shall not authorize its Representatives to, and shall direct its Representatives not to, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate or knowingly facilitate or encourage (including by way of furnishing non-public information) the making of an Acquisition Proposal, (ii) engage in, continue or otherwise participate in any discussions (except to notify a Person that makes any inquiry or offer with respect to an Acquisition Proposal of the existence of the provisions of this Section 6.3 or to clarify whether any such inquiry, offer or proposal constitutes an Acquisition Proposal) or negotiations regarding, or furnish to any other Person any non-public information in connection with or for the purpose of knowingly encouraging or facilitating, an Acquisition Proposal, (iii) recommend or enter into any Contract, letter of intent, acquisition agreement, agreement in principle or similar agreement with respect to an Acquisition Proposal, (iv) waive or release any Person from, or fail to use reasonable best efforts to enforce, any standstill agreement or any standstill provisions of any Contract entered into in respect of a potential Acquisition Proposal or (v) approve, authorize or agree to do any of the foregoing; provided, however, the Company Board may take, or omit to take, any of the actions contemplated by clause (iv) of this Section 6.3 in the event that the Company determines in good faith, after consultation with the Company’s outside legal counsel, that the failure to do so would reasonably be expected to constitute a breach of the   -39-


fiduciary duties of the Company Board under applicable Law. The Company and its directors, officers and employees shall, and the Company shall direct its other Representatives to, within one (1) Business Day of the date of this Agreement, (A) cease and cause to be terminated any solicitation and any and all existing discussions or negotiations with any Person conducted heretofore with respect to any Acquisition Proposal or inquiry or request for information that could reasonably be expected to lead to, or result in, an Acquisition Proposal, and (B) terminate access by any Person (other than Parent, Purchaser, the Company or any of their respective Affiliates or Representatives) to any physical or electronic data room relating to any potential Acquisition Proposal. For the avoidance of doubt, any violation of the restrictions set forth in this Section 6.3(a) by a director or officer of the Company shall be deemed to be a breach of this Section 6.3(a) by the Company.  (Pages 43-44)

Question: Liability for breaches of no-shop by Target Representatives (Y/N)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: No
directors,  officers,  managers,  employees,  investment  bankers,  attorneys,  accountants  and  other  advisors  and representatives,  collectively,  the  “Representatives” <omitted> 

4.2           Acquisition Proposals.   (a)            Subject to Sections 4.2(c) and 4.2(d), the Company shall, and shall cause its Subsidiaries to, and shall instruct its and their respective Representatives to (i) immediately cease and cause to be terminated any existing solicitation, initiation, discussion or negotiation with any Person conducted theretofore by the Company, its Subsidiaries or any of their Representatives with respect to any Acquisition Proposal or with respect to any inquiries, indications of interest or offer that would reasonably be expected to result in an Acquisition Proposal, in each case other than (a)directing such Persons to the provisions contained in this Section 4.2or (b)following receipt of an unsolicited Acquisition Proposal, contacting such Person or its Representatives solely to clarify the terms and conditions of such Acquisition Proposal pursuant to and in accordance with Section 4.2(c)below, (ii)within three (3)business days of the date hereof, request in writing that each Person that has heretofore executed a confidentiality agreement in connection with its consideration of any Acquisition Proposal or potential Acquisition Proposal promptly destroy or return to the Company all nonpublic information previously furnished by the Company or any of its Representatives to such Person or any of such Person’s Representatives in accordance with the terms of such confidentiality agreement, (iii)within one (1)business day of the date hereof, terminate access to any physical or electronic data room relating to a possible Acquisition Proposal by such Person and its Representatives and (iv)not waive any standstill, confidentiality or similar provision to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party; provided that nothing in this Agreement shall restrict the Company from permitting a Person to request the waiver of a “standstill” or similar obligation solely to make an unsolicited and nonpublic Acquisition Proposal in compliance with this Section 4.2 or from granting such a waiver, in each case, to the extent that such waiver is required for such Person to make an unsolicited and nonpublic Acquisition Proposal to the Company in compliance with this Section 4.2. Any failure to comply with the Company’s instructions required under this Section 4.2(a) by any of the Company’s or its Subsidiary’s Representatives shall be deemed to be a breach of this Agreement by the Company. (Page 20)

Question: Liability for breaches of no-shop by Target Representatives (Y/N)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Yes
Section 5.4          Non-Solicitation; Change in Recommendation. 

(a)          Except as expressly permitted by this Section 5.4, the Company agrees that neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries nor any of the Affiliates, directors, officers and employees of it or its Subsidiaries shall, and that it shall instruct and use its reasonable best efforts to cause its and its Subsidiaries’ other Representatives not to, directly or indirectly, (i) initiate, solicit, propose or knowingly encourage any inquiry or the making of any proposal or offer that constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to lead to, an Acquisition Proposal, or any other effort or attempt to make or implement an Acquisition Proposal, (ii) engage in, continue or otherwise participate in any discussions with or negotiations relating to any Acquisition Proposal or any inquiry, proposal or offer that would reasonably be expected to lead to an Acquisition Proposal (other than to state that the terms of this Agreement prohibit such discussions), (iii) provide any nonpublic information to any Person in connection with any Acquisition Proposal or any inquiry, proposal or offer that would reasonably be expected to lead to an Acquisition Proposal, (iv) approve or execute or enter into any letter of intent, agreement in principle, merger agreement, business combination agreement, sale or purchase agreement or share exchange agreement, option agreement or any other similar agreement related to any Acquisition Proposal, other than an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement (an “Acquisition Agreement”), or (v) propose or agree to do any of the foregoing.  (Page 68)

Question: Liability for breaches of no-shop by Target Representatives (Y/N)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Yes
SECTION 5.02. No Solicitation; Adverse Recommendation Change.

(a) Upon execution and delivery of this Agreement, the Company shall not, and shall cause its Subsidiaries and its and their respective directors, officers and employees not to, and shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause its and their other Representatives not to, directly or indirectly, from the date hereof until the earlier of the termination of this Agreement and the Effective Time, (i) solicit, initiate, or knowingly encourage or knowingly take any other action to facilitate any inquiries regarding, or the submission of any proposal or offer that constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to lead to, any Company Takeover Proposal (it being understood and agreed that ministerial acts that are not otherwise prohibited by this Section 5.02(a)(i) (such as answering unsolicited phone calls) shall not (in and of itself) be deemed to facilitate for purposes of, or otherwise constitute a violation of, this Section 5.02), (ii) enter into, continue, knowingly encourage or otherwise participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or furnish to any Person (other than Parent or Merger Sub) any non-public information with respect to or in connection with any Company Takeover Proposal, or (iii) execute or enter into any letter of intent, memorandum of understanding, agreement in principle, acquisition agreement, option agreement, merger agreement, joint venture agreement, partnership agreement or any other agreement or arrangement relating to any Company Takeover Proposal, other than an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement (a “Company Acquisition Agreement”). It is agreed that any violation of the restrictions in this Section 5.02 by any of the Company’s Representatives shall be a breach of this Section 5.02 by the Company.  (Page 53)

Question: Liability for breaches of no-shop by Target Representatives (Y/N)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Yes
6.3           No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> (b)           Except as otherwise permitted by this Section 6.3, from and after the date of this Agreement until the Effective Time or if earlier, the termination of this Agreement in accordance with Article VIII, the Company will not, and will cause its Subsidiaries and will instruct and use commercially reasonable efforts to cause its Representatives not to, directly or indirectly, (i) initiate, solicit or knowingly encourage the making of a Company Competing Proposal, (ii) engage in any discussions or negotiations with any Person with respect to a Company Competing Proposal, (iii) furnish any non-public information regarding the Company or its Subsidiaries, or access to the properties, assets or employees of the Company or its Subsidiaries, to any Person in connection with or in response to a Company Competing Proposal, (iv) enter into any binding or nonbinding letter of intent or agreement in principle, or other agreement providing for a Company Competing Proposal (other than a confidentiality agreement as provided in Section 6.3(d)(ii)), or (v) withdraw, modify or qualify, or propose publicly to withdraw, modify or qualify, in a manner adverse to Parent, the Company Board Recommendation or publicly recommend the approval or adoption of, or publicly approve or adopt, any Company Competing Proposal (the taking of any action described in clause (v) of this Section 6.3(b) being referred to as a “Company Change of Recommendation”).  (Page 25)

Question: Liability for breaches of no-shop by Target Representatives (Y/N)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Yes
Section 6.3 No Solicitation; Other Offers. 

(a) General Prohibitions. Subject to Section 6.3(b), from the date hereof until the earlier to occur of the termination of this Agreement pursuant to ARTICLE 10 and the Effective Time, the Company shall not, and shall cause its Subsidiaries and its and their respective directors, officers, employees, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants and other advisors or representatives (collectively, “Representatives”) not to, (i) solicit, initiate or knowingly take any action to facilitate or encourage, directly or indirectly, the submission of any Acquisition Proposal, (ii) enter into or participate in any discussions or negotiations with, furnish any non-public information relating to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or afford access to the business, properties, assets, books or records of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to any Third Party in furtherance of any expression of interest, proposal or offer that constitutes or could reasonably be expected to result in an Acquisition Proposal <omitted> 
(d) Application of this Provision to Representatives. Any violation or non-performance of the restrictions on the Company set forth in this ​Section 6.3 by any Representative of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries shall be a breach of this​Section 6.3 by the Company. (Page 46)

Question: Liability for breaches of no-shop by Target Representatives (Y/N)
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Yes