Sansaboo/maud huggingface dataset:
Section 6.3    No Solicitation by the Company. 
<omitted> 
(b)    From and after the date of this Agreement, the Company and its officers and directors will not, will cause the Company’s Subsidiaries and its and their respective controlled Affiliates and other Representatives not to, directly or indirectly: 
<omitted> 
provided, that notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company or any of its Representatives may, (A) provide information in response to a request therefor by a Person who has made an unsolicited bona fide written Company Competing Proposal after the date hereof that did not result from a breach (other than a de minimis breach) of this Section 6.3 if the Company receives from the Person so requesting such information an executed confidentiality agreement on terms not less restrictive to the other party than those contained in the Confidentiality Agreement (an “Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement”), it being understood that such Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement need not prohibit the making, or amendment, of a Company Competing Proposal and shall not prohibit compliance by the Company with this Section 6.3, and the Company shall promptly disclose (and, if applicable, provide copies of) any such information provided to such Person to Parent to the extent not previously provided to Parent; or (B) engage or participate in any discussions or negotiations with any Person who has made such an unsolicited bona fide written Company Competing Proposal after the date hereof that did not result from a breach (other than a de minimis breach) of this Section 6.3, if and only to the extent that, (x) prior to taking any action described   57


in clause (A) or (B) above, the Company Board determines in good faith after consultation with its outside legal counsel that failure to take such action in light of the Company Competing Proposal would be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary duties under applicable law and (y) in each such case referred to in clause (A) or (B) above, the Company Board has determined in good faith based on the information then available and after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel that such Company Competing Proposal either constitutes a Company Superior Proposal or is reasonably likely to result in a Company Superior Proposal. (Pages 61-62)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
4.2    Company No Solicitation. (a) <omitted> provided, however, that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, prior to obtaining the Required Company Stockholder Vote, the Company and its Representatives may engage or otherwise participate in discussions or negotiations with, and provide information to, any Person (or its Representatives) that has made a bona fide written Company Acquisition Proposal that did not result from any breach of this Section 4.2(a) by the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any of its or their respective Representatives if: (A) prior to taking any such action, the Company Board   39


determines in good faith, after consultation with the Company’s outside legal counsel and its financial advisor, that such Company Acquisition Proposal either constitutes a Company Superior Proposal or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Company Superior Proposal; and (B) prior to providing any information regarding the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company to such third party in response to such Company Acquisition Proposal, the Company receives from such third party (or there is then in effect with such party) an executed confidentiality agreement that contains nondisclosure provisions that are at least as restrictive of such third party as the Confidentiality Agreement and that does not prohibit compliance by the Company with this Section 4.2. Prior to or substantially concurrently with providing any non-public information to such third party, the Company shall make such non-public information available to Parent (to the extent such non-public information has not been previously made available by the Company to Parent). The Company shall promptly (and in any event within 24 hours) inform Parent if the Company furnishes non-public information and/or enters into discussions or negotiations as provided for in this Section 4.2(a) and will keep Parent reasonably informed, on a current basis, of the status and terms of any Company Acquisition Proposal (including any material changes to the terms thereof) and the status of any discussions and negotiations with respect thereto.  (Pages 44-45)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
Section 7.3 No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> (b) Notwithstanding the limitations set forth in Section 7.3(a) or anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, if, prior to the time the Company Shareholder Approval is obtained, the Company receives an unsolicited Company Acquisition Proposal not resulting, in whole or in part, from a breach of this Section 7.3, that the Company Board reasonably determines in good faith, after consultation with the Company’s outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, (i) is or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Company Proposal and (ii) failure to take such action would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law, then the Company may, in response to such Company Acquisition Proposal, furnish nonpublic information relating to the Company and its Subsidiaries to the Person or group (or any of their Representatives or potential financing sources) making such Company Acquisition Proposal and engage in discussions or negotiations with such Person or group and their Representatives regarding such Company Acquisition Proposal  (Page 68)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
Section 5.09    No Solicitation by Company. <omitted> provided, that, prior to the receipt of the Requisite Company Stockholder Approval, in the event Company receives an unsolicited bona fide written Company Acquisition Proposal, it may, and may permit its Subsidiaries and its and its Subsidiaries’ Representatives to, furnish or cause to be furnished nonpublic information or data and participate in such negotiations or discussions to the extent that its board of directors concludes in good faith (after receiving the advice of its outside counsel, and with respect to financial matters, its financial advisor) that such Company Acquisition Proposal is reasonably likely to lead to a Company Superior Proposal and failure to take such actions would be reasonably likely to result in a violation of its fiduciary duties under applicable Law (Page 69)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
SECTION 5.02           No Solicitation by the Company; Company Board Recommendation. <omitted> Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, in response to the receipt of a bona fide, written Company Takeover Proposal made after the date of this Agreement that does not result from a material breach of this Section 5.02(a) and that the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors) constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Company Proposal, the Company and its Representatives may (A) furnish information with respect to the Company and the Company Subsidiaries to the Person making such Company Takeover Proposal (and its Representatives) (provided that all such information has previously been provided to Parent or is provided to Parent substantially concurrently with the provision of such information to such Person) pursuant to a confidentiality agreement containing confidentiality restrictions substantially not less favorable to the Company than the Confidentiality Agreement, and (B) participate in discussions regarding the terms of such Company Takeover Proposal, including terms of a Company Acquisition Agreement with respect thereto, and the negotiation of such terms with the Person making such Company Takeover Proposal (and such Person’s Representatives) but, in each case referred to in the foregoing clauses (A) and (B), if and only if (1) the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors) that the failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties to stockholders under applicable Law and (2) the Company shall have delivered to Parent prior written notice advising Parent that it intends to take the action(s) contemplated by clauses (A) and/or (B). (Page 42)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
Section 5.11    No Solicitation by First Choice; Superior Proposals. <omitted> (b )    Notwithstanding Section 5.11(a) or any other provision of this Agreement, at any time prior to obtaining the Requisite First Choice Shareholder Approval, First Choice may take any of the actions described in Section 5.11(a) if, but only if, (i) First Choice has received a bona fide unsolicited written Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a breach of this Section 5.11; (ii) the First Choice Board reasonably determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisor and outside legal counsel, that (a) such Acquisition Proposal constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal and (b) the failure to take such actions would breach or reasonably be expected to result in a breach of its fiduciary duties under applicable Law; and (iii) prior to furnishing or affording access to any information or data with respect to First Choice or any First Choice Subsidiary or otherwise relating to an Acquisition Proposal, First Choice receives from such Person a confidentiality agreement with 

67


terms no less favorable to First Choice than those contained in the confidentiality agreement with Enterprise (it being understood that nothing therein shall have the effect of a standstill provision). First Choice shall promptly provide to Enterprise any non-public information regarding First Choice or First Choice Subsidiaries provided to any other Person which was not previously provided to Enterprise, such additional information to be provided no later than the date of provision of such information to such other party.  (Pages 72-73)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
6.12 Acquisition Proposals. (a) <omitted> Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that after the date of this Agreement and prior to the receipt of the Requisite BancShares Vote, in the case of BancShares, or the Requisite CIT Vote, in the case of CIT, a party receives an unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition Proposal not solicited in violation of this Section 6.12, such party may, and may permit its Subsidiaries and its and its Subsidiaries’ Representatives to, furnish or cause to be furnished confidential or nonpublic information or data and participate in such negotiations or discussions with the person making the Acquisition Proposal if, but only if, the board of directors of such party concludes in good faith (after receiving the advice of its outside counsel, and with respect to financial matters, its financial advisors) that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal or is reasonably likely to lead to a Superior Proposal and that failure to take such actions would more likely than not result in a violation of its fiduciary duty under applicable law, and subject to providing twenty four (24) hours’ prior written notice of its decision to take such action to CIT or BancShares, as applicable, and identifying the person making the Acquisition Proposal and all of the material terms and conditions of such Acquisition Proposal;  (Page 63)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
(b)          Notwithstanding the limitations set forth in Section 5.3(a) and subject to Section 5.3(c), if the Company receives an Alternative Proposal prior to obtaining Company Stockholder Approval that did not result from a material breach of Section 5.3 with respect to which the Board of Directors of the Company determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside legal counsel, constitutes or could reasonably be expected to result in a Superior Proposal, the Company may take the following actions: (x) furnish nonpublic information to the third party (including such third party’s Representatives) making such Alternative Proposal, if, prior to so furnishing such information, the Company receives from the third party an executed agreement having provisions requiring such party to keep such information confidential that are substantially similar to the comparable confidentiality provisions of the Confidentiality Agreement (it being understood that such agreement need not have comparable standstill provisions) (provided that the Company shall substantially concurrently with the delivery to such person provide to Parent any non-public information concerning the Company or any of its Subsidiaries that is provided or made available to such person or its Representatives unless such non-public information has been previously provided or made available to Parent or its Representatives), and (y) engage in discussions or negotiations with the third party (including such third party’s Representatives) with respect to the Alternative Proposal.  (Page 45)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
6.3 No Solicitation by the Company. <omitted> provided that, if, at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside counsel and financial advisors) that any such proposal that did not result from a breach of this Section 6.3 (other than any breach that is immaterial in scope and effect) constitutes or would reasonably be expected to lead to a Company Superior Proposal, subject to compliance with Section 6.3(c) (other than any non-compliance that is immaterial in scope and effect), the Company, its controlled Affiliates and its and their Representatives may (A) furnish information with respect to the Company and its Affiliates to the person (or group of persons) making such proposal (and its Representatives) (provided that all such information has previously been made available to Parent or is made available to Parent prior to or substantially concurrent with the time it is provided to such person) pursuant to a customary confidentiality agreement containing confidentiality terms no less restrictive in any material respect than the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement and that does not prohibit compliance with the terms of this Section 6.3, and (B) participate in discussions or negotiations regarding such proposal with the person (or group of persons) making such proposal and its Representatives.  (Page 48)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
Non-Solicitation; Acquisition Proposals; Change of Recommendation
<omitted>

(b) Exceptions. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 6.1 or Section 6.3,  but subject to compliance with the remainder of this Article VI,  nothing contained in this Agreement shall prevent the Company or its Board of Directors from:
<omitted>

(iii)  prior to (but not after) obtaining the Company Requisite Vote, (A) engaging in any communications, negotiations or discussions with any Person or group of Persons and their respective Representatives who has made an Acquisition Proposal after the date hereof that was not solicited in breach (other than an unintentional or de minimis breach) of Section 6.1(a) (which negotiations or discussions need not be solely for clarification purposes) and (B) providing access to the Company’s or any of its subsidiaries’ properties, books and records and providing information or data in response to a request therefor by a Person who has made a bona fide and written Acquisition Proposal after the date hereof that was not solicited in breach (other than an unintentional or de minimis breach) of Section 6.1(a), in each case, if the Board of Directors (A) shall have determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor(s), that, based on the information then available, such Acquisition Proposal constitutes or would reasonably be expected to constitute, result in or lead to a Superior Proposal and (B) has received from the Person who has made such Acquisition Proposal an executed Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement; provided that the Company shall provide to Parent and Merger Sub any material non-public information or data that is provided to any Person given such access that was not previously made available to Parent or Merger Sub prior to or promptly following the time it is provided to such Person  (Page 49)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
5.3. No Solicitation: Acquisition Proposals.  <omitted>  (c) Superior Proposals. In the event that any Person or Group submits to the Company (and does not withdraw) an unsolicited, written Acquisition Proposal that the Company Board concludes in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and a financial advisor of national standing) is, or could reasonably be expected to lead to, a Superior Proposal, then, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 5.3(a), the Company may, so long as the Company Stockholder Approval has not yet been obtained, (i) enter into discussions with such Person or Group regarding such Acquisition Proposal and (ii) deliver or make available to such Person non-public information regarding the Company and the Subsidiaries; provided that, in each such case, the Company, the Subsidiaries and the Company Representatives shall have complied with each of the following: (A) none of the Company, the Subsidiaries or any Company Representative shall have violated this Section 5.3 in any material respect, (B) the Company Board first shall have concluded in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel) that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary obligations to the Company’s stockholders under Applicable Legal Requirements, (C) prior to making available to any such Person any material non- public information, the Company first shall have received from such Person an executed Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement (a copy of which executed Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement shall be provided to Parent, for informational purposes only, within one Business Day of its execution) and (D) prior to or contemporaneously with delivering or making available any such non-public information to such Person, the Company shall have delivered or made available (disregarding the date limitations in the definition of “made available”) such non-public information to Parent (to the extent such non- public information has not previously been delivered or made available (disregarding the date limitations in the definition of “made available”) by the Company to Parent). (Page 63)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer
Section 6.3.    Solicitation. <omitted> (c)    Notwithstanding the limitations set forth in Section 6.3(a), if the Company receives, prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, a bona fide written Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a breach of Section 6.3(a), which the Company Board of Directors determines in good faith (i) after consultation with the Company’s outside legal counsel and financial advisors constitutes a Superior Proposal or is reasonably expected to lead to a Superior Proposal and (ii) after consultation with the Company’s outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action would be reasonably likely to constitute a breach of the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law, then the Company may take the following actions: (x) furnish information (including nonpublic information) with respect to the Company to the Person making such Acquisition Proposal (and its Representatives), if, and only if, prior to so furnishing any nonpublic information, the Company receives from such Person an executed Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement and the Company also provides Parent, prior to or substantially concurrently with the time such nonpublic information is provided or made available to such Person or its Representatives, any information furnished to such other Person or its Representatives that was not previously furnished to Parent, and (y) engage in discussions or negotiations with such Person (and its Representatives) with respect to such Acquisition Proposal. (Page 56)

Question: Fiduciary exception: Board determination trigger (no shop)-Answer
Subquestion: <NONE>
Answer: Superior Offer, or Acquisition Proposal reasonably likely/expected to result in a Superior Offer