Empiricism

context: Philosophical empiricists hold no knowledge to be properly inferred or deduced unless it is derived from one's sense-based experience. This view is commonly contrasted with rationalism, which states that knowledge may be derived from reason independently of the senses. For example, John Locke held that some knowledge (e.g. knowledge of God's existence) could be arrived at through intuition and reasoning alone. Similarly Robert Boyle, a prominent advocate of the experimental method, held that we have innate ideas. The main continental rationalists (Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz) were also advocates of the empirical "scientific method".
qas: answers: text: rationalism
question: What is commonly contrasted with empiricism?

answers: text: reason independently of the senses
question: Where does rationalism say knowledge comes from?

answers: text: knowledge of God's existence
question: What is an example knowledge being derived from intuition?

answers: text: intuition and reasoning alone
question: What did Locke think some knowledge could come from?

answers: text: Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz
question: Where were the main European rationalists?

context: Aristotle's explanation of how this was possible was not strictly empiricist in a modern sense, but rather based on his theory of potentiality and actuality, and experience of sense perceptions still requires the help of the active nous. These notions contrasted with Platonic notions of the human mind as an entity that pre-existed somewhere in the heavens, before being sent down to join a body on Earth (see Plato's Phaedo and Apology, as well as others). Aristotle was considered to give a more important position to sense perception than Plato, and commentators in the Middle Ages summarized one of his positions as "nihil in intellectu nisi prius fuerit in sensu" (Latin for "nothing in the intellect without first being in the senses").
qas: answers: text: his theory of potentiality and actuality
question: What theory was Aristotle's explanation based on?

answers: text: an entity that pre-existed somewhere in the heavens, before being sent down to join a body on Earth
question: How did Plato's Phaedo and Apology think of the mind?

answers: text: Aristotle
question: Who thought the senses were more important, Aristotle or Plato?

answers: text: Plato
question: Who thought the senses were less important, Aristotle or Plato?

answers: text: Latin for "nothing in the intellect without first being in the senses"
question: What does "nihil in intellectu nisi prius fuerit in sensu" mean?

context: This idea was later developed in ancient philosophy by the Stoic school. Stoic epistemology generally emphasized that the mind starts blank, but acquires knowledge as the outside world is impressed upon it. The doxographer Aetius summarizes this view as "When a man is born, the Stoics say, he has the commanding part of his soul like a sheet of paper ready for writing upon." Later stoics, such as Sextus of Chaeronea, would continue this idea of empiricism in later Stoic writings as well. As Sextus contends "For every thought comes from sense-perception or not without sense-perception and either from direct experience or not without direct experience" (Against the Professors, 8.56-8).
qas: answers: text: the mind starts blank, but acquires knowledge as the outside world is impressed upon it
question: What is the Stoic view?

answers: text: doxographer
question: What was Aetius's career?

answers: text: Chaeronea
question: Where was Sextus from?

answers: text: Sextus
question: Who wrote 'Against the Professors'?

answers: text: Aetius
question: Whose ideas did Sextus build on?

context: During the Middle Ages Aristotle's theory of tabula rasa was developed by Islamic philosophers starting with Al Farabi, developing into an elaborate theory by Avicenna and demonstrated as a thought experiment by Ibn Tufail. For Avicenna (Ibn Sina), for example, the tabula rasa is a pure potentiality that is actualized through education, and knowledge is attained through "empirical familiarity with objects in this world from which one abstracts universal concepts" developed through a "syllogistic method of reasoning in which observations lead to propositional statements which when compounded lead to further abstract concepts". The intellect itself develops from a material intellect (al-'aql al-hayulani), which is a potentiality "that can acquire knowledge to the active intellect (al-'aql al-fa'il), the state of the human intellect in conjunction with the perfect source of knowledge". So the immaterial "active intellect", separate from any individual person, is still essential for understanding to occur.
qas: answers: text: Aristotle
question: Whose idea was 'tabula rasa'?

answers: text: Islamic
question: What religion was Al Farabi?

answers: text: material intellect
question: What does al-'aql al-hayulani mean?

answers: text: active intellect
question: What does al-'aql al-fa'il mean?

answers: text: the immaterial "active intellect"
question: What is crucial for understanding?

context: In the 12th century CE the Andalusian Muslim philosopher and novelist Abu Bakr Ibn Tufail (known as "Abubacer" or "Ebn Tophail" in the West) included the theory of tabula rasa as a thought experiment in his Arabic philosophical novel, Hayy ibn Yaqdhan in which he depicted the development of the mind of a feral child "from a tabula rasa to that of an adult, in complete isolation from society" on a desert island, through experience alone. The Latin translation of his philosophical novel, entitled Philosophus Autodidactus, published by Edward Pococke the Younger in 1671, had an influence on John Locke's formulation of tabula rasa in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.
qas: answers: text: Abu Bakr Ibn Tufail
question: What was 'Abubacer' normally called?

answers: text: Abu Bakr Ibn Tufail
question: What was 'Ebn Topnail' normally called?

answers: text: Muslim
question: What was Ibn Tufail's religion?

answers: text: Andalusian
question: What was Ibn Tufail's ethnicity?

answers: text: 12th century CE
question: When did Ibn Tufail live?

context: In the late renaissance various writers began to question the medieval and classical understanding of knowledge acquisition in a more fundamental way. In political and historical writing Niccolò Machiavelli and his friend Francesco Guicciardini initiated a new realistic style of writing. Machiavelli in particular was scornful of writers on politics who judged everything in comparison to mental ideals and demanded that people should study the "effectual truth" instead. Their contemporary, Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519) said, "If you find from your own experience that something is a fact and it contradicts what some authority has written down, then you must abandon the authority and base your reasoning on your own findings."
qas: answers: text: 1452
question: When was da Vinci born?

answers: text: 1519
question: When did da Vinci die?

answers: text: the medieval and classical understanding of knowledge acquisition
question: What did renaissance writers question?

answers: text: writers on politics who judged everything in comparison to mental ideals
question: Who did Machiavelli disdain?

answers: text: abandon the authority and base your reasoning on your own findings
question: What did da Vinci advise when your experience contradicted authority?

context: The decidedly anti-Aristotelian and anti-clerical music theorist Vincenzo Galilei (ca. 1520–1591), father of Galileo and the inventor of monody, made use of the method in successfully solving musical problems, firstly, of tuning such as the relationship of pitch to string tension and mass in stringed instruments, and to volume of air in wind instruments; and secondly to composition, by his various suggestions to composers in his Dialogo della musica antica e moderna (Florence, 1581). The Italian word he used for "experiment" was esperienza. It is known that he was the essential pedagogical influence upon the young Galileo, his eldest son (cf. Coelho, ed. Music and Science in the Age of Galileo Galilei), arguably one of the most influential empiricists in history. Vincenzo, through his tuning research, found the underlying truth at the heart of the misunderstood myth of 'Pythagoras' hammers' (the square of the numbers concerned yielded those musical intervals, not the actual numbers, as believed), and through this and other discoveries that demonstrated the fallibility of traditional authorities, a radically empirical attitude developed, passed on to Galileo, which regarded "experience and demonstration" as the sine qua non of valid rational enquiry.
qas: answers: text: ca. 1520
question: When was Vincenzo Galilei born?

answers: text: 1591
question: When did Vincenzo Galilei die?

answers: text: Galileo
question: Who was Vincenzo Galilei's oldest son?

answers: text: experiment
question: What does 'esperienza' mean?

context: British empiricism, though it was not a term used at the time, derives from the 17th century period of early modern philosophy and modern science. The term became useful in order to describe differences perceived between two of its founders Francis Bacon, described as empiricist, and René Descartes, who is described as a rationalist. Thomas Hobbes and Baruch Spinoza, in the next generation, are often also described as an empiricist and a rationalist respectively. John Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume were the primary exponents of empiricism in the 18th century Enlightenment, with Locke being the person who is normally known as the founder of empiricism as such.
qas: answers: text: 17th century
question: When was the British empiricism period?

answers: text: empiricist
question: What type of philosopher was Francis Bacon?

answers: text: rationalist
question: What type of philosopher was Descartes?

answers: text: empiricist
question: What type of philosopher was Hobbes?

answers: text: rationalist
question: What type of philosopher was Spinoza?

context: In response to the early-to-mid-17th century "continental rationalism" John Locke (1632–1704) proposed in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689) a very influential view wherein the only knowledge humans can have is a posteriori, i.e., based upon experience. Locke is famously attributed with holding the proposition that the human mind is a tabula rasa, a "blank tablet", in Locke's words "white paper", on which the experiences derived from sense impressions as a person's life proceeds are written. There are two sources of our ideas: sensation and reflection. In both cases, a distinction is made between simple and complex ideas. The former are unanalysable, and are broken down into primary and secondary qualities. Primary qualities are essential for the object in question to be what it is. Without specific primary qualities, an object would not be what it is. For example, an apple is an apple because of the arrangement of its atomic structure. If an apple was structured differently, it would cease to be an apple. Secondary qualities are the sensory information we can perceive from its primary qualities. For example, an apple can be perceived in various colours, sizes, and textures but it is still identified as an apple. Therefore, its primary qualities dictate what the object essentially is, while its secondary qualities define its attributes. Complex ideas combine simple ones, and divide into substances, modes, and relations. According to Locke, our knowledge of things is a perception of ideas that are in accordance or discordance with each other, which is very different from the quest for certainty of Descartes.
qas: answers: text: 1689
question: When was 'An Essay Concerning Human Understanding' published?

answers: text: John Locke
question: Who wrote 'An Essay Concerning Human Understanding'?

answers: text: blank tablet
question: What does 'tabula rasa' mean?

answers: text: white paper
question: What did Locke say 'tabula rasa' meant?

answers: text: on which the experiences derived from sense impressions as a person's life proceeds are written
question: What did Locke's 'tabula rasa' concept say happens to the mind?

context: A generation later, the Irish Anglican bishop, George Berkeley (1685–1753), determined that Locke's view immediately opened a door that would lead to eventual atheism. In response to Locke, he put forth in his Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge (1710) an important challenge to empiricism in which things only exist either as a result of their being perceived, or by virtue of the fact that they are an entity doing the perceiving. (For Berkeley, God fills in for humans by doing the perceiving whenever humans are not around to do it.) In his text Alciphron, Berkeley maintained that any order humans may see in nature is the language or handwriting of God. Berkeley's approach to empiricism would later come to be called subjective idealism.
qas: answers: text: George Berkeley
question: Who wrote 'Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge'?

answers: text: George Berkeley
question: Who wrote 'Alciphron'?

answers: text: 1710
question: When was 'Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge' published?

answers: text: Anglican
question: What religion was George Berkeley?

answers: text: Irish
question: What nationality was George Berkeley?

context: The Scottish philosopher David Hume (1711–1776) responded to Berkeley's criticisms of Locke, as well as other differences between early modern philosophers, and moved empiricism to a new level of skepticism. Hume argued in keeping with the empiricist view that all knowledge derives from sense experience, but he accepted that this has implications not normally acceptable to philosophers. He wrote for example, "Locke divides all arguments into demonstrative and probable. On this view, we must say that it is only probable that all men must die or that the sun will rise to-morrow, because neither of these can be demonstrated. But to conform our language more to common use, we ought to divide arguments into demonstrations, proofs, and probabilities—by ‘proofs’ meaning arguments from experience that leave no room for doubt or opposition." And,
qas: answers: text: a new level of skepticism
question: What did Hume bring to empiricism?

answers: text: Scottish
question: What was Hume's nationality?

answers: text: demonstrative and probable
question: What two types of arguments did Locke say there are?

answers: text: 1776
question: When did Hume die?

answers: text: 1711
question: When was Hume born?

context: Hume divided all of human knowledge into two categories: relations of ideas and matters of fact (see also Kant's analytic-synthetic distinction). Mathematical and logical propositions (e.g. "that the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the two sides") are examples of the first, while propositions involving some contingent observation of the world (e.g. "the sun rises in the East") are examples of the second. All of people's "ideas", in turn, are derived from their "impressions". For Hume, an "impression" corresponds roughly with what we call a sensation. To remember or to imagine such impressions is to have an "idea". Ideas are therefore the faint copies of sensations.
qas: answers: text: relations of ideas and matters of fact
question: What types of human knowledge did Hume say there are?

answers: text: relations of ideas
question: What type of human knowledge is math?

answers: text: matters of fact
question: What type of human knowledge is observing the world?

answers: text: matters of fact
question: What type of human knowledge is "the sun rises in the East"?

answers: text: their "impressions"
question: Where did Hume say people's ideas come from?

context: Hume maintained that all knowledge, even the most basic beliefs about the natural world, cannot be conclusively established by reason. Rather, he maintained, our beliefs are more a result of accumulated habits, developed in response to accumulated sense experiences. Among his many arguments Hume also added another important slant to the debate about scientific method — that of the problem of induction. Hume argued that it requires inductive reasoning to arrive at the premises for the principle of inductive reasoning, and therefore the justification for inductive reasoning is a circular argument. Among Hume's conclusions regarding the problem of induction is that there is no certainty that the future will resemble the past. Thus, as a simple instance posed by Hume, we cannot know with certainty by inductive reasoning that the sun will continue to rise in the East, but instead come to expect it to do so because it has repeatedly done so in the past.
qas: answers: text: a result of accumulated habits, developed in response to accumulated sense experiences
question: What did Hume think our beliefs are?

answers: text: reason
question: What did Hume think our beliefs can't be established solely by?

answers: text: the justification for inductive reasoning
question: What did Hume think is a circular argument?

answers: text: that the sun will continue to rise in the East
question: What did Hume say we can't know by inductive reasoning?

answers: text: because it has repeatedly done so in the past
question: Why did Hume say we expect the sun to rise?

context: Most of Hume's followers have disagreed with his conclusion that belief in an external world is rationally unjustifiable, contending that Hume's own principles implicitly contained the rational justification for such a belief, that is, beyond being content to let the issue rest on human instinct, custom and habit. According to an extreme empiricist theory known as phenomenalism, anticipated by the arguments of both Hume and George Berkeley, a physical object is a kind of construction out of our experiences. Phenomenalism is the view that physical objects, properties, events (whatever is physical) are reducible to mental objects, properties, events. Ultimately, only mental objects, properties, events, exist — hence the closely related term subjective idealism. By the phenomenalistic line of thinking, to have a visual experience of a real physical thing is to have an experience of a certain kind of group of experiences. This type of set of experiences possesses a constancy and coherence that is lacking in the set of experiences of which hallucinations, for example, are a part. As John Stuart Mill put it in the mid-19th century, matter is the "permanent possibility of sensation". Mill's empiricism went a significant step beyond Hume in still another respect: in maintaining that induction is necessary for all meaningful knowledge including mathematics. As summarized by D.W. Hamlin:
qas: answers: text: that belief in an external world is rationally unjustifiable
question: What conclusion do most of Hume's followers disagree with?

answers: text: belief in an external world
question: What did Hume say can't be rationally justified?

answers: text: physical objects, properties, events (whatever is physical) are reducible to mental objects, properties, events
question: What is phenomenalism?

answers: text: Phenomenalism
question: What is subjective idealism closely related to?

answers: text: the "permanent possibility of sensation"
question: What did John Stuart Mill say matter is?

context: Mill's empiricism thus held that knowledge of any kind is not from direct experience but an inductive inference from direct experience. The problems other philosophers have had with Mill's position center around the following issues: Firstly, Mill's formulation encounters difficulty when it describes what direct experience is by differentiating only between actual and possible sensations. This misses some key discussion concerning conditions under which such "groups of permanent possibilities of sensation" might exist in the first place. Berkeley put God in that gap; the phenomenalists, including Mill, essentially left the question unanswered. In the end, lacking an acknowledgement of an aspect of "reality" that goes beyond mere "possibilities of sensation", such a position leads to a version of subjective idealism. Questions of how floor beams continue to support a floor while unobserved, how trees continue to grow while unobserved and untouched by human hands, etc., remain unanswered, and perhaps unanswerable in these terms. Secondly, Mill's formulation leaves open the unsettling possibility that the "gap-filling entities are purely possibilities and not actualities at all". Thirdly, Mill's position, by calling mathematics merely another species of inductive inference, misapprehends mathematics. It fails to fully consider the structure and method of mathematical science, the products of which are arrived at through an internally consistent deductive set of procedures which do not, either today or at the time Mill wrote, fall under the agreed meaning of induction.
qas: answers: text: an inductive inference from direct experience
question: What did Mill say knowledge comes from?

answers: text: actual and possible sensations
question: What sensations did Mill differentiate?

answers: text: God
question: When Mill left a question of sensations unanswered, how did Berkeley answer it?

answers: text: gap-filling entities
question: What did Mill say might not actually exist?

answers: text: the structure and method of mathematical science, the products of which are arrived at through an internally consistent deductive set of procedures
question: What did Mill misrepresent about math?

context: The phenomenalist phase of post-Humean empiricism ended by the 1940s, for by that time it had become obvious that statements about physical things could not be translated into statements about actual and possible sense data. If a physical object statement is to be translatable into a sense-data statement, the former must be at least deducible from the latter. But it came to be realized that there is no finite set of statements about actual and possible sense-data from which we can deduce even a single physical-object statement. Remember that the translating or paraphrasing statement must be couched in terms of normal observers in normal conditions of observation. There is, however, no finite set of statements that are couched in purely sensory terms and can express the satisfaction of the condition of the presence of a normal observer. According to phenomenalism, to say that a normal observer is present is to make the hypothetical statement that were a doctor to inspect the observer, the observer would appear to the doctor to be normal. But, of course, the doctor himself must be a normal observer. If we are to specify this doctor's normality in sensory terms, we must make reference to a second doctor who, when inspecting the sense organs of the first doctor, would himself have to have the sense data a normal observer has when inspecting the sense organs of a subject who is a normal observer. And if we are to specify in sensory terms that the second doctor is a normal observer, we must refer to a third doctor, and so on (also see the third man).
qas: answers: text: phenomenalist
question: What phase of empiricism ended in the 1940s?

answers: text: in purely sensory terms
question: How can't a finite set of statements be described?

answers: text: a second doctor
question: What is necessary to explain a doctor's normality in sensory terms?

context: Logical empiricism (also logical positivism or neopositivism) was an early 20th-century attempt to synthesize the essential ideas of British empiricism (e.g. a strong emphasis on sensory experience as the basis for knowledge) with certain insights from mathematical logic that had been developed by Gottlob Frege and Ludwig Wittgenstein. Some of the key figures in this movement were Otto Neurath, Moritz Schlick and the rest of the Vienna Circle, along with A.J. Ayer, Rudolf Carnap and Hans Reichenbach.
qas: answers: text: logical positivism or neopositivism
question: What are other terms for logical empiricism?

answers: text: early 20th-century
question: When was logical empricism formulated?

answers: text: British empiricism
question: What did logical empiricism try to combine with mathematical logic?

answers: text: Logical empiricism
question: What was Otto Neurath an important member of?

answers: text: Logical empiricism
question: What was AJ Ayer an important member of?

context: The neopositivists subscribed to a notion of philosophy as the conceptual clarification of the methods, insights and discoveries of the sciences. They saw in the logical symbolism elaborated by Frege (1848–1925) and Bertrand Russell (1872–1970) a powerful instrument that could rationally reconstruct all scientific discourse into an ideal, logically perfect, language that would be free of the ambiguities and deformations of natural language. This gave rise to what they saw as metaphysical pseudoproblems and other conceptual confusions. By combining Frege's thesis that all mathematical truths are logical with the early Wittgenstein's idea that all logical truths are mere linguistic tautologies, they arrived at a twofold classification of all propositions: the analytic (a priori) and the synthetic (a posteriori). On this basis, they formulated a strong principle of demarcation between sentences that have sense and those that do not: the so-called verification principle. Any sentence that is not purely logical, or is unverifiable is devoid of meaning. As a result, most metaphysical, ethical, aesthetic and other traditional philosophical problems came to be considered pseudoproblems.
qas: answers: text: 1872
question: When was Bertrand Russell born?

answers: text: 1970
question: When did Bertrand Russell die?

answers: text: all mathematical truths are logical
question: What did Frege say about math?

answers: text: all logical truths are mere linguistic tautologies
question: What did Wittgenstein say about logic?

answers: text: most metaphysical, ethical, aesthetic and other traditional philosophical problems
question: What are pseudoproblems?

context: In the extreme empiricism of the neopositivists—at least before the 1930s—any genuinely synthetic assertion must be reducible to an ultimate assertion (or set of ultimate assertions) that expresses direct observations or perceptions. In later years, Carnap and Neurath abandoned this sort of phenomenalism in favor of a rational reconstruction of knowledge into the language of an objective spatio-temporal physics. That is, instead of translating sentences about physical objects into sense-data, such sentences were to be translated into so-called protocol sentences, for example, "X at location Y and at time T observes such and such." The central theses of logical positivism (verificationism, the analytic-synthetic distinction, reductionism, etc.) came under sharp attack after World War II by thinkers such as Nelson Goodman, W.V. Quine, Hilary Putnam, Karl Popper, and Richard Rorty. By the late 1960s, it had become evident to most philosophers that the movement had pretty much run its course, though its influence is still significant among contemporary analytic philosophers such as Michael Dummett and other anti-realists.
qas: answers: text: neopositivists
question: Who were extreme empiricists?

answers: text: Nelson Goodman, W.V. Quine, Hilary Putnam, Karl Popper, and Richard Rorty
question: Who attacked logical positivism?

answers: text: anti-realists
question: What position does Dummett take?

answers: text: Carnap and Neurath
question: Who abandoned phenomenalism?

context: In the late 19th and early 20th century several forms of pragmatic philosophy arose. The ideas of pragmatism, in its various forms, developed mainly from discussions between Charles Sanders Peirce and William James when both men were at Harvard in the 1870s. James popularized the term "pragmatism", giving Peirce full credit for its patrimony, but Peirce later demurred from the tangents that the movement was taking, and redubbed what he regarded as the original idea with the name of "pragmaticism". Along with its pragmatic theory of truth, this perspective integrates the basic insights of empirical (experience-based) and rational (concept-based) thinking.
qas: answers: text: In the late 19th and early 20th century
question: When did pragmatism arise?

answers: text: Charles Sanders Peirce and William James
question: Who developed pragmatism?

answers: text: Harvard
question: Where did Peirce and James meet?

answers: text: in the 1870s
question: When did Peirce and James meet?

answers: text: pragmaticism
question: What did Peirce later call his ideas instead of pragmatism?

context: Charles Peirce (1839–1914) was highly influential in laying the groundwork for today's empirical scientific method.[citation needed] Although Peirce severely criticized many elements of Descartes' peculiar brand of rationalism, he did not reject rationalism outright. Indeed, he concurred with the main ideas of rationalism, most importantly the idea that rational concepts can be meaningful and the idea that rational concepts necessarily go beyond the data given by empirical observation. In later years he even emphasized the concept-driven side of the then ongoing debate between strict empiricism and strict rationalism, in part to counterbalance the excesses to which some of his cohorts had taken pragmatism under the "data-driven" strict-empiricist view.
qas: answers: text: 1839
question: When was Peirce born?

answers: text: 1914
question: When did Peirce die?

answers: text: the "data-driven" strict-empiricist view
question: What view did Peirce think had been driven to excess?

answers: text: Charles Peirce
question: Who formed the basis for modern scientific method?

answers: text: Descartes
question: Whose rationalism did Peirce criticize?

context: Among Peirce's major contributions was to place inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning in a complementary rather than competitive mode, the latter of which had been the primary trend among the educated since David Hume wrote a century before. To this, Peirce added the concept of abductive reasoning. The combined three forms of reasoning serve as a primary conceptual foundation for the empirically based scientific method today. Peirce's approach "presupposes that (1) the objects of knowledge are real things, (2) the characters (properties) of real things do not depend on our perceptions of them, and (3) everyone who has sufficient experience of real things will agree on the truth about them. According to Peirce's doctrine of fallibilism, the conclusions of science are always tentative. The rationality of the scientific method does not depend on the certainty of its conclusions, but on its self-corrective character: by continued application of the method science can detect and correct its own mistakes, and thus eventually lead to the discovery of truth".
qas: answers: text: a century
question: How long before Peirce did Hume write?

answers: text: complementary
question: How did Peirce view inductive vs deductive reasoning?

answers: text: competitive
question: How did Hume view inductive vs deductive reasoning?

answers: text: the conclusions of science are always tentative
question: What did fallibilism say?

answers: text: its self-corrective character
question: What does the scientific method's rationality depend on?

context: In his Harvard "Lectures on Pragmatism" (1903), Peirce enumerated what he called the "three cotary propositions of pragmatism" (L: cos, cotis whetstone), saying that they "put the edge on the maxim of pragmatism". First among these he listed the peripatetic-thomist observation mentioned above, but he further observed that this link between sensory perception and intellectual conception is a two-way street. That is, it can be taken to say that whatever we find in the intellect is also incipiently in the senses. Hence, if theories are theory-laden then so are the senses, and perception itself can be seen as a species of abductive inference, its difference being that it is beyond control and hence beyond critique – in a word, incorrigible. This in no way conflicts with the fallibility and revisability of scientific concepts, since it is only the immediate percept in its unique individuality or "thisness" – what the Scholastics called its haecceity – that stands beyond control and correction. Scientific concepts, on the other hand, are general in nature, and transient sensations do in another sense find correction within them. This notion of perception as abduction has received periodic revivals in artificial intelligence and cognitive science research, most recently for instance with the work of Irvin Rock on indirect perception.
qas: answers: text: Peirce
question: Who wrote 'Lectures on Pragmatism'?

answers: text: 1903
question: When was 'Lectures on Pragmatism' published?

answers: text: unique individuality or "thisness"
question: What is 'haecceity'?

answers: text: indirect perception
question: What did Irvin Rock write about?

answers: text: in artificial intelligence and cognitive science research
question: Where has 'perception as abduction' come up repeatedly?

context: Around the beginning of the 20th century, William James (1842–1910) coined the term "radical empiricism" to describe an offshoot of his form of pragmatism, which he argued could be dealt with separately from his pragmatism – though in fact the two concepts are intertwined in James's published lectures. James maintained that the empirically observed "directly apprehended universe needs ... no extraneous trans-empirical connective support", by which he meant to rule out the perception that there can be any value added by seeking supernatural explanations for natural phenomena. James's "radical empiricism" is thus not radical in the context of the term "empiricism", but is instead fairly consistent with the modern use of the term "empirical". (His method of argument in arriving at this view, however, still readily encounters debate within philosophy even today.)
qas: answers: text: William James
question: Who came up with 'radical empiricism'?

answers: text: in James's published lectures
question: Where were James's pragmatism and radical empiricism intertwined?

answers: text: 1842
question: When was William James born?

answers: text: 1910
question: When did William James die?

answers: text: Around the beginning of the 20th century
question: When did James come up with 'radical empiricism'?

context: John Dewey (1859–1952) modified James' pragmatism to form a theory known as instrumentalism. The role of sense experience in Dewey's theory is crucial, in that he saw experience as unified totality of things through which everything else is interrelated. Dewey's basic thought, in accordance with empiricism was that reality is determined by past experience. Therefore, humans adapt their past experiences of things to perform experiments upon and test the pragmatic values of such experience. The value of such experience is measured experientially and scientifically, and the results of such tests generate ideas that serve as instruments for future experimentation, in physical sciences as in ethics. Thus, ideas in Dewey's system retain their empiricist flavour in that they are only known a posteriori.
qas: answers: text: John Dewey
question: Who came up with 'instrumentalism'?

answers: text: reality is determined by past experience
question: What did Dewey think about reality?

answers: text: 1859
question: When was Dewey born?

answers: text: 1952
question: When did Dewey die?

answers: text: James' pragmatism
question: What was instrumentalism a modification of?