p140Cap Controls Female Fertility in Mice Acting via Glutamatergic Afference on Hypothalamic Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons

<jats:p>p140Cap, encoded by the gene <jats:italic>SRCIN1</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>SRC kinase signaling inhibitor 1)</jats:italic>, is an adaptor/scaffold protein highly expressed in the mouse brain, participating in several pre- and post-synaptic mechanisms. <jats:italic>p140Cap</jats:italic> knock-out (KO) female mice show severe hypofertility, delayed puberty onset, altered estrus cycle, reduced ovulation, and defective production of luteinizing hormone and estradiol during proestrus. We investigated the role of p140Cap in the development and maturation of the hypothalamic gonadotropic system. During embryonic development, migration of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) neurons from the nasal placode to the forebrain in <jats:italic>p140Cap</jats:italic> KO mice appeared normal, and young <jats:italic>p140Cap</jats:italic> KO animals showed a normal number of GnRH-immunoreactive (-ir) neurons. In contrast, adult <jats:italic>p140Cap</jats:italic> KO mice showed a significant loss of GnRH-ir neurons and a decreased density of GnRH-ir projections in the median eminence, accompanied by reduced levels of GnRH and LH mRNAs in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland, respectively. We examined the number of kisspeptin (KP) neurons in the rostral periventricular region of the third ventricle, the number of KP-ir fibers in the arcuate nucleus, and the number of KP-ir punctae on GnRH neurons but we found no significant changes. Consistently, the responsiveness to exogenous KP <jats:italic>in vivo</jats:italic> was unchanged, excluding a cell-autonomous defect on the GnRH neurons at the level of KP receptor or its signal transduction. Since glutamatergic signaling in the hypothalamus is critical for both puberty onset and modulation of GnRH secretion, we examined the density of glutamatergic synapses in <jats:italic>p140Cap</jats:italic> KO mice and observed a significant reduction in the density of VGLUT-ir punctae both in the preoptic area and on GnRH neurons. Our data suggest that the glutamatergic circuitry in the hypothalamus is altered in the absence of p140Cap and is required for female fertility.</jats:p>

section_content: The neuroendocrine control of sexual maturation and reproduction is a critical process, essential for the preservation of species. In mammals, the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis exerts a tight regulation in all phases, controlling both puberty onset and fertility. Three major hierarchically organized anatomical components participate in the HPG axis: the hypothalamus, the pituitary gland, and the gonads. The HPG axis is centrally governed by the pulsatile release of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) into the pituitary portal system by the GnRH-secreting neurons whose cell bodies, in mice, are scattered within the medial septum (MS), preoptic area (POA), anterior hypothalamic area (AHA), and the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis (OVLT) (Jasoni et al., 2009). 

During embryonic development, the first GnRHimmunoreactive (-ir) cells are first seen in the region of the olfactory placode and, although they have a mixed origin (Forni et al., 2011), they migrate along the axons of olfactory receptor neurons of the vomeronasal organ to reach the olfactory bulb primordium around E13, and then the septum-hypothalamic area (Cariboni et al., 2007). When GnRH neurons reach the hypothalamus, they engage in complex synaptic circuits with local and projection neurons and send their projections to the median eminence (ME), where they release GnRH into the pituitary portal bloodstream. Once released, GnRH acts on membrane-bound GnRH receptors present on endocrine cells of the anterior pituitary gland to induce the synthesis and secretion of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) (Grachev and Goodman, 2016). 

In prepubertal mice, GnRH neurons show a complex morphology, with a highly branched dendritic tree, while in adult mice the vast majority of these neurons show 1 or 2 extensions from the soma, appearing unipolar or bipolar (Cottrell et al., 2006). However, the functional significance of this morphological maturation is yet to be determined. 

Defects of GnRH neuron activity or migration are thought to be the primary cellular cause of congenital disorders known as Kallmann Syndrome and Central Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism, characterized by delayed sexual maturation and hypofertility (Cariboni and Maggi, 2006; Boehm et al., 2015). 

While migration and homing of GnRH neurons are well studied at the cellular and molecular level, other aspects remain poorly understood, such as the trophic factors that assure GnRH neuron survival until puberty and adult age, and the full array of neurotransmitters and neuropeptides that drive their final maturation and function (Clarkson and Herbison, 2006; Cottrell et al., 2006; Herbison, 2016). 

In rodents, a wealth of evidence indicates that the secretory activity of GnRH neurons is modulated by neuropeptides, such as kisspeptin (KP) and neuropeptide Y (NPY), as well as classical neurotransmitters, such as glutamate, GABA, monoamines, and acetylcholine (Spergel, 2019a,b). Focusing on glutamate, it has been hypothesized that glutamatergic neurotransmission is critical for both the activation of GnRH neurons at the time of puberty and the modulation of GnRH secretion, required for fertility (Iremonger et al., 2010; Spergel, 2019a). 

For example, NMDA receptor agonists can induce precocious puberty, while NMDA receptor antagonists can delay puberty onset (Urbanski, 1990; Smyth and Wilkinson, 1994). Moreover, NMDA antagonists can inhibit either spontaneous or stimulated LH secretion in female rats (Urbanski, 1990; Brann and Mahesh, 1991). The effect of glutamate on GnRH neurons has been also investigated in several in vitro studies using immortalized GnRHir cell lines, which indicate a GnRH release-promoting activity of glutamate (Spergel et al., 1994; El-Etr et al., 2006). 

The p140Cap protein (also known as SNIP), encoded by the gene Srcin1, is a docking/adaptor molecule that binds Src kinase and p130Cas (Stefano et al., 2004), coordinates the intracellular transduction of membrane receptors and cell adhesion signals, finely modulates cell responses, and has been implicated in integrin-dependent cell adhesion and signaling (Di Stefano et al., 2007). In the rodent brain, p140Cap is widely expressed in the cortex, cerebellum, hippocampus, and hypothalamus (Chin et al., 2000), and is localized at both the post-synaptic and the pre-synaptic compartments of excitatory synapses, where it is involved in the morphological and functional maturation of the synapse (Ito et al., 2008; Tomasoni et al., 2013; Li et al., 2017). 

We noticed that p140Cap knock-out (KO) mice are severely hypofertile. Therefore, we decided to characterize the neuroendocrine gonadotropic system controlling sexual maturation and fertility in these mice. We reveal a non-cellautonomous function of p140Cap for glutamatergic input on juvenile and adult GnRH neurons, which is required for efficient female fertility.
section_name: INTRODUCTION

section_name: MATERIALS AND METHODS

section_content: Mice with the targeted mutation of p140Cap have been previously described (Repetto et al., 2014). The mutation was maintained in homozygosity (as the animals are healthy, despite reduced fertility) in the transgenic unit of the Molecular Biotechnology Center (University of Turin, Turin, Italy) and animals were given water and food ad libitum. Genetic screening was performed by PCR as previously described (Repetto et al., 2014). Procedures were conducted in conformity with national and international laws and policies, protocols were approved by the internal Ethical Committee and authorized by the Italian Ministry of Health. To assess the fertility of both sexes, three possible mating combinations between p140Cap KO and WT P60 female and male mice were carried out. Measurements included the number of days required to produce the first litter, the numbers of litters born, and the number of pups per litter, recorded over 90 days.
section_name: Mouse Strains and Fertility Assay

section_content: Assessment of vaginal opening and examination of estrus cyclicity were carried out as previously described (Caligioni, 2009). Vaginal lavage of p140Cap KO females and their control littermates was performed every day (9:00 A. M. to 11:00 A. M. ) for 20 consecutive days using 0. 9% saline. Smears were observed under the microscope and the phase identified as diestrus/metestrus if they predominantly contained leukocytes, as proestrus if they predominantly contained nucleated cells, and as estrus if they predominantly contained cornified epithelial cells. An estrus cycle was considered normal when the vaginal lavage had leukocytes for 2 days followed by 1 day of nucleated cells and 1-2 days of cornified cells.
section_name: Puberty Onset and Estrous Cyclicity

section_content: Ovaries were collected from P120 p140Cap KO and WT mice, fixed in 4% (w/v) PFA in PBS, and stored at 4 • C. Paraffinembedded ovaries were sectioned at a thickness of 5 µm and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Corpora lutea and preovulatory follicles were counted on photomicrographs from every tenth section throughout the ovary.
section_name: Ovarian Histology and Quantitative Analysis

section_content: Pregnant mare's serum gonadotropin (5 IU/mouse) was inoculated intraperitoneally in P60 p140Cap KO and WT animals. 48 h later, human chorionic gonadotropin (5 IU/mouse) was administered intraperitoneally to stimulate ovulation. After 22 h, mice were sacrificed, the ovaries were removed, cells of the cumulus oophorus were eliminated by treatment with 0. 3% hyaluronidase, and the oocytes were collected and counted. KP-54 (Tocris) was injected intraperitoneally (1 nmol in 100 µl of PBS/mouse) in P45 (for the determination of c-Fos-ir GnRH neurons) and P60 (for the quantification of serum LH levels) p140Cap KO and WT females in the diestrus phase of the estrous cycle. For the quantification of serum LH levels, animals were deeply anesthetized and blood was collected from the retro-orbital cavity 1 h after the injection. For the determination of c-Fos-ir GnRH neurons, animals were deeply anesthetized and transcardially perfused 90 min after the injection, and brains processed as described below.
section_name: Hormonal Stimulation

section_content: For the preparation of adult and P10 p140Cap KO and WT brains, mice were deeply anesthetized with Avertin (30 µl pure Avertin in 400 µl of PBS/mouse), transcardially perfused with 10 ml of PBS and then with 10 ml of 4% (w/v) PFA in PBS, and brains were dissected. For kisspeptin immunolabeling, P100 p140Cap KO and WT females in the proestrus phase of the estrous cycle were analyzed. For VGLUT-VGAT/GnRH double immunolabeling, P60 p140Cap KO and WT females in the diestrus phase of the estrous cycle were analyzed. For VGLUT-VGAT/KP double immunolabeling, P120 p140Cap KO and WT females in the proestrus phase of the estrous cycle were analyzed. For the preparation of embryonic brains, E14. 5 embryos were collected by cesarean cut, and brains were dissected. After dissection, embryonic, P0, P10, and adult brains were post-fixed overnight at 4 • C in 4% (w/v) PFA in PBS, placed overnight at 4 • C in 30% (w/v) sucrose in PBS for cryoprotection, embedded in OCT blocks, and stored at -80 • C until analysis. P0, P10, and adult brains were sliced into free-floating coronal sections of 30 µm using a cryotome (Leica CM1950). Free-floating sections were collected in PBS in multiwell plates and stored at -20 • C in a cryoprotectant solution [30% (v/v) glycerol and 30% (v/v) ethylene glycol in 0. 2 M phosphate buffer, pH 7. 4] until processed for immunolabeling. Embryonic brains were sliced into sagittal sections of 16 µm using a cryotome, mounted on glass slides, and stored at -20 • C until processed for immunolabeling.
section_name: Brain Preparation and Histological Analysis

section_content: Immunohistochemistry to detect GnRH was performed as previously reported (Giacobini et al., 2008). For GnRH/p140Cap, GnRH/VGAT, GnRH/VGLUT, and c-Fos/GnRH double immunostainings, sections were blocked in 12% Normal Goat Serum and 2% Bovine Serum Albumin in 0. 5% TritonX-100 in PBS for 1 h at room temperature (RT) and subsequently incubated with primary antibodies in 0. 1% TritonX-100 in PBS for 48 h at 4 • C. Sections were then washed in PBS, incubated with the secondary antibodies and DAPI (1:1000) diluted in 0. 2% TritonX-100 in PBS for 2 h at RT, and washed three times in PBS. Staining for KP/GnRH was carried out as described elsewhere (Naulé et al., 2014). For KP/VGLUT and KP/VGAT double immunostainings, sections were blocked in 2% Normal Goat Serum and 0. 2% Bovine Serum Albumin in 0. 2% TritonX-100 in PBS for 1 h at RT. Sections were then incubated with anti-KP primary antibody in 0. 2% TritonX-100 in PBS for 48 h at 4 • C, incubated with anti-sheep secondary antibody diluted in 0. 2% TritonX-100 in PBS for 2 h at RT, incubated with anti-VGLUT/VGAT primary antibody in 0. 2% TritonX-100 in PBS for 48 h at 4 • C, incubated with anti-guinea pig secondary antibody diluted in 0. 2% TritonX-100 in PBS for 2 h at RT, and finally washed three times in PBS. GnRH/activated caspase 3 immunostainings were carried out as described elsewhere (Macchi et al., 2017). Sections were mounted on glass slides using 1,4-diazabicyclo [2. 2. 2] octane (Sigma-Aldrich) and examined. In all steps, p140Cap KO and WT sections were processed in parallel at the same time. The total number of GnRH-ir neurons in the adult brain was determined as described elsewhere (Herbison et al., 2008). Determination of the total number of GnRH-ir neurons in the embryonic brain was carried out by sectioning whole brains in sagittal orientation at 16 µm. GnRH-ir neurons were counted in every third section through the brain, and the number obtained was multiplied by 3 to get the total number of GnRH neurons. Quantification of GnRH immunoreactivity (voxel counts) was carried out on anatomically matched sections of the median eminence [plates 47-50 of the Mouse Brain Atlas of Paxinos et Franklin (Paxinos and Franklin, 2001) ]. Determination of the number of kisspeptin neurons was carried out in anatomically matched sections of the anteroventral periventricular region (plates 28-29) and the rostral (plate 30) and caudal (plates 31-32) regions of the RP3V. Quantification of kisspeptin immunoreactivity (voxel counts) was carried out on anatomically matched sections of the arcuate nucleus (plate 41-45). Determination of the number of VGLUT-ir punctae in the OVLT and POA was carried out on anatomically matched sections (plates 25-27).
section_name: Immunohistochemistry

section_content: In situ hybridization was carried out as previously described (Oleari et al., 2021). Briefly, PFA-fixed 20 µm thick cryosections were incubated with digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled anti-sense riboprobes for mouse Gnrh1 at 65 • C. mRNA expression was revealed with AP-conjugated anti-DIG antibody (1:1500; Roche), 4-Nitro blue tetrazolium chloride solution, and 5-Bromo-4chloro-3-indolyl phosphate disodium salt (1:1000, Roche).
section_name: In situ Hybridization

section_content: Primary antibodies used are: rabbit anti-GnRH (Beauvillain and Tramu, 1980), sheep anti-KP AC053 (Franceschini et al., 2013), sheep anti-GnRH (Skrapits et al., 2015), mouse anti-p140Cap (Grasso et al., 2018, see Supplementary Figure 1 for specificity test), guinea pig anti-Vesicular GABA Transporter (VGAT, Synaptic System, used 1:500), guinea pig anti-Vesicular glutamate Transporter (VGLUT, Synaptic System, used 1:500), rabbit antic-Fos (sc-52 Santacruz, used 1:500) and rabbit anti-cleaved caspase 3 (Cell Signaling Technology, used 1:400, Whittaker et al., 2021). Secondary antibodies used are: Alexa-Fluor 488 goat antirabbit (Invitrogen, used 1:400), Cy3 goat anti-rabbit (Invitrogen, used 1:800), Alexa-Fluor 568 goat anti-mouse (Invitrogen, used 1:400), FITC anti-guinea pig (Sigma F6261, used 1:100), Cy3 donkey anti-sheep (Jackson, used 1:1000). Peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were obtained from GE Healthcare.
section_name: Antibodies

section_content: Following cycle stage determination by vaginal smear microscopic analysis, mice were anesthetized in the afternoon of proestrus and at the diestrus stage, and blood was collected from the retro-orbital cavity. Serum LH was measured using Rodent LH ELISA kit (ERKR7017, Endocrine Technologies). Serum E2 was measured using Rodent estradiol ELISA kit (ERKR7011, Endocrine Technologies).
section_name: Blood Sampling and Hormonal Assays

section_content: Images were captured using a Nikon microscope (Eclipse 80i) and 2 × /0. 06 NA, 10 × /0. 30 NA, and 20 × /0. 50 NA objectives (Nikon) equipped with a digital camera (CX 9000; MBF Bioscience). For observation coupled with confocal analysis, a laser-scanning Fluoview confocal system (IX70; Olympus) and 10 × /0. 30 NA, 20 × /0. 70 NA, and 60 × /1. 25 NA objectives (Olympus) were used. Subsequent analysis of digitized images was performed with ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 1 ) software. For the determination of c-Fos-ir GnRH neurons, c-Fos-ir/GnRH-ir double-stained neurons in the hypothalamus were counted and expressed as a percentage of the total number of GnRH-ir neurons. Quantification of kisspeptin and GnRH-ir fiber density was carried out by voxel counts on a set of 10 serial image planes (z step size = 1 µm). KP-ir, VGLUT-ir, and VGAT-ir punctae on GnRH neurons were counted manually in a set of 20 serial image planes (z step size = 0. 5 µm). Only GnRH neurons whose cell bodies were entirely present in the slice depth were considered for the analysis. The density of VGLUT-ir punctae in the OVLT and POA was calculated using the function "Find Maxima" of ImageJ. Photoshop (Adobe) software was used to process, adjust and merge the photomontages.
section_name: Photo-Documentation and Image Analysis

section_content: Total RNA was extracted from dessected hypothalami and pituitary glands from p140Cap KO and WT mice using Trizol Reagent (Ambion, Life Technologies Italia) and its concentration was determined with a NanoDrop TM 1100 (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, United States). Total RNA was reverse transcribed with high-capacity cDNA reverse transcriptase (#4368813, Applied BioSystem) according to the manufacturer's instructions and amplified with specific primers. Taqman PCR reactions were performed using the Universal Probe Library system (Roche Italia, Monza, Italy) and quantified with the Molecular Analyst software (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The 18S rRNA pre-developed TaqMan assay (#4319413, Applied Biosystems) was used as an internal control. The expression of the target genes was calibrated against the values obtained in WT animals. Primers and probes used:
section_name: Real-Time Quantitative PCR for Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone and Luteinizing Hormone mRNA Levels

section_content: For the statistical comparison, GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software Inc. ) was used. For each experiment, the statistical test used is reported in the figure legends. Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were used to test for normality, F test was used to test for equality of variance, and results were evaluated to choose the appropriate statistical test.
section_name: Statistical Analysis

section_name: RESULTS

section_content: We noticed that p140Cap KO mice have a lower mating success as compared to WT, even if they do not show any apparent behavioral deficit that could be accounted for hypofertility. To quantify the hypofertility and to assess whether both male and female fertility was affected, we set up a continuous mating protocol of 90 days, comparing different breeding combinations of P60 mice. In matings involving WT females and KO males, the number of days required to produce the first litter (Figure 1A ), the fertility index (Figure 1B ), determined as the number of litters obtained in 90 days, and the number of pups/litter (Figure 1C ), were similar to matings between WT animals. In contrast, in matings involving KO females and WT males, both the number of days required to produce the first litter (Figure 1A ) and the fertility index (Figure 1B ) were significantly lower, while the number of pups/litter was normal (Figure 1C ). These results suggest that the loss of p140Cap significantly alters female, but not male, fertility.
section_name: p140Cap KO Females Exhibit Reduced Fertility

section_content: Considering that the lack of p140Cap impacted only the reproductive axis in females and not in males, female mice were further characterized. To determine whether hypofertility was associated with ovulation deficiency, we evaluated ovarian morphology and follicle classification in P120 p140Cap KO and WT mice. Histological examination of p140Cap KO ovaries revealed a significant reduction in the number of pre-ovulatory follicles and corpora lutea as compared to WT (Figures 2A-C ). 

The defect observed in the ovarian compartment is apparently in contrast with the unaltered litter size observed in p140Cap KO mice. However, considering that several parameters can affect the number of pups at each pregnancy, such as efficiency of implantation, placenta functionality, and frequency of miscarriage, the reduced ovulation efficiency may be compensated, resulting in normal litter size. The impaired ovulation may depend on the loss of p140Cap expression in the ovarian tissue. Therefore, p140Cap expression was assessed by Western blot analysis on tissue extracts from the ovary and total brain of p140Cap KO and WT mice. As shown in Figure 2D, while p140Cap is highly expressed in the brain, it is undetectable in ovary extracts, indicating that the ovarian phenotype is non-cell-autonomous and may depend on the upstream hormonal axis. 

To test if the reduced ovulation in p140Cap KO females was due to an impaired hormonal stimulation, a classical protocol of exogenous stimulation with Pregnan' Mare's Serum Gonadotropin (PMSG) and Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) was performed. As shown in Figure 2E, a relevant number of oocytes was found in both p140Cap KO and WT mice, indicating that in p140Cap KO females the ovarian tissue is still able to respond to an exogenous hormonal stimulation. However, while super-ovulation led to a mean of 20 oocytes/ampulla in WT mice, p140Cap KO females produced < 10 oocytes/ampulla. These results indicate that, although the ovarian tissue of KO mice may be less responsive, it is still able to undergo effective ovulation upon proper stimulation. 

Ovulation of mature follicles in the ovary is induced by a large burst of GnRH-induced LH secretion-the preovulatory LH surge-which is triggered by increased estradiol (E2) levels. 

To assess the hormonal status in p140Cap KO mice, serum E2 and LH were quantified by ELISA in diestrus and proestrus phases. The results show that E2 and LH serum levels in p140Cap KO females do not increase during proestrus (Figures 2F, G ), meaning that p140Cap KO females do not show the expected E2 and LH surge during proestrus, implying that these mice have a defective LH and E2 production in the proestrus stage.
section_name: p140Cap KO Females Show Impaired Ovulation and Altered Hormonal Status

section_content: We evaluated vaginal opening as an external index of puberty onset. Vaginal opening in female rodents is dependent on E2 levels and it reflects the maturation of the mouse female genital tract at the time of puberty, dependent on the activation of the HPG axis (Kennedy and Armstrong, 1973; Rodriguez et al., 1997). Weaned p140Cap KO and WT P21 females were daily examined for vaginal opening and the appearance of the first estrus, by flushing of vaginal secretion. Both vaginal opening and first estrus were significantly delayed in p140Cap KO females (Figures 3A, B ). We also analyzed estrous cyclicity of p140Cap KO female mice by daily inspection of vaginal cytology. We found that p140Cap KO animals spend only 5% of time in the estrus phase, while WT females spend more than 20% of time (Figure 3C and Supplementary Figure 2 ), indicating that p140Cap KO mice have altered estrous cyclicity. 

p140Cap Is Detected in Embryonic, but Not in Adult, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons

The endocrine and ovarian phenotypes described above clearly point to a central defect of GnRH neurons. Thus, we set forth to examine the expression and localization of p140Cap in the nasal-olfactory region of the developing embryo, and in the adult hypothalamus, by double immunostaining with anti-p140Cap and anti-GnRH antibodies, followed by confocal microscopy. At earlier embryonic ages, co-expression was clearly detected in a subpopulation (about 25-30%) of GnRH-ir neurons in the olfactory region and ventral forebrain (Figure 4A ). When we analyzed sections of the adult hypothalamus, p140Cap was not detected in GnRH-ir neurons (Figure 4B ), although it was detected in the vast majority of cells in this region. 

Finally, we examined the expression of p140Cap on tissue extracts from the pituitary gland and hypothalamus by western blot analysis. While p140Cap is undetectable in pituitary gland extracts, it is highly expressed in the hypothalamus (Figure 4C ), consistently with the immunostaining results.
section_name: p140Cap KO Females Display Delayed Puberty Onset and Abnormal Estrous Cyclicity

section_content: To define which component of the HPG axis is affected by the absence of p140Cap, we analyzed the amount of GnRH and LH transcripts in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland of p140Cap KO females. Real-time quantitative PCR analysis showed a marked decrease in both LH expression in the pituitary (Figure 5A ) and GnRH expression in the hypothalamus (Figure 5B ) of p140Cap KO females, as compared to WT. These data indicate that, in the absence of p140Cap, the hypothalamus is defective in the expression of GnRH mRNA, with a consequent negative impact on LH expression. These results also imply that the defect in p140Cap KO mice may depend on impaired GnRH neuronal function. 

Next, we evaluated the number of GnRH neurons in the MS, POA, AHA, and OVLT of p140Cap KO and WT P60 females, and we detected a significant 40% reduction in the total number of GnRH neurons in the mutant mice (Figures 5C, D ), which is consistent with the reduced levels of GnRH mRNA. No ectopic localization of GnRH neurons was observed in mutant mice. 

To verify that the loss of GnRH-ir neurons resulted from the lack of GnRH mRNA, and not from defects in GnRH prohormone processing, we conducted in situ hybridization. We found a significant reduction in the number of GnRH mRNAcontaining neurons in p140Cap KO adult females as compared to WT (Supplementary Figures 3A, B ). 

GnRH neurons project their axons to the ME, where GnRH is released into the pituitary portal blood for delivery to the anterior pituitary, eliciting the secretion of LH and FSH. To assess if the reduction in the number of GnRH neurons resulted in a reduced number of GnRH innervation in the ME, we analyzed the ME of P60 females, by immunostaining with anti-GnRH. The results show a reduction of GnRH-immunoreactivity in p140Cap KO mice as compared with WT (Figures 5E, F ). 

A reduced number of hypothalamic GnRH neurons may result from an altered migration during embryonic development, impaired neurogenesis, or altered survival of GnRH neurons. To determine whether the absence of the p140Cap may impact the migration of GnRH embryonic neurons, we analyzed the nasalolfactory region, the olfactory bulbs, and the ventral forebrain of p140Cap KO and WT E14. 5 embryos. As shown in Figure 5G, there was no significant variation in the number of GnRH neurons between p140Cap KO and WT embryos in the various regions, indicating that the absence of p140Cap does not cause migratory defects of immature GnRH neurons during embryonic development. We also found no difference in the total number of GnRH neurons present in the hypothalamus of p140Cap KO and WT mice at E14. 5, P0, and P10 (Figure 5H ), indicating that the lower number of GnRH neurons in adult p140Cap KO mice does not result from impaired neurogenesis. Finally, to assess if the decreased number of GnRH neurons was due to increased cell death, we labeled adjacent coronal sections of the medial POA (MPOA, where most GnRH neurons reside) in P30 females, with antibodies against GnRH or activated caspase-3, a marker for cells committed to undergo apoptosis. Only a few apoptotic cells were detected in the MPOA of p140Cap KO and WT mice (1-2 cells per animal, Supplementary Figure 3C ), suggesting that the loss of GnRH neurons in p140Cap KO mice is not due to increased apoptosis. Therefore, we were not able to determine the mechanism underlying the loss of GnRH neurons in p140Cap KO mice.
section_name: p140Cap KO Females Show Reduced Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone mRNA Level, Reduced Number of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons, and Reduced Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Innervation at the Median Eminence

section_content: Having excluded embryonic migratory defects of GnRH neurons, a reduced number of hypothalamic GnRH neurons may result from post-migratory early-postnatal defects. We examined the morphological maturation of GnRH neurons in the hypothalamus of p140Cap KO and WT mice. We determined the fraction of GnRH neurons showing a unipolar/bipolar or a multipolar morphology in the brains of p140Cap KO and WT P10 female mice. In p140Cap KO brains, 34% of GnRH neurons were multipolar and 66% were bipolar, while in WT brains the fractions were 20% and 80%, respectively (Supplementary Figure 4A ). The same analysis was conducted on brains from P60 (young adults) females, but we observed no change in the morphology of GnRH neurons (Supplementary Figure 4B ). These results indicate that, in the absence of p140Cap, juvenile hypothalamic GnRH neurons are delayed in their morphological maturation. 

p140Cap KO Females Show a Normal Kisspeptin Neuroanatomy and a Normal Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/Luteinizing Hormone Response to Exogenous Kisspeptin

Since the sole reduction in the number of GnRH neurons is unlikely to account for the hypofertility observed in p140Cap KO mice (Herbison et al., 2008), we further analyzed the KP system. 

The KP system, consisting of two groups of KP neurons located in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) and in the rostral periventricular region of the third ventricle (RP3V), has a crucial role in the control of GnRH neurons activity and pulsatility (Clarkson et al., 2009; Harter et al., 2018). Considering the wide distribution of p140Cap expression in the mouse brain, we hypothesized that a defect in the endogenous KP neuroendocrine system could affect the function/activity of GnRH neurons. Thus, we set forth to determine whether alteration of the KP system could account for the reduced function of GnRH neurons in p140Cap KO females. We double-immunostained anatomically matched hypothalamic sections of p140Cap KO and WT female brains for KP and GnRH and determined the number of KP neurons in the RP3V, the density of KP-ir fibers in the ARC, and the number of KP-ir punctae in close apposition to GnRH neurons. In the absence of p140Cap, we observed no changes in the number of KP neurons in the RP3V (Figures 6A, B ), in the density of KP-ir fibers in the ARC (Figures 6C, D ), and in the number of KP-ir punctae in close apposition to GnRH neurons (Figures 6E, F ). 

Next, we decided to further probe the immediate responsiveness of GnRH neurons to exogenous KP, as a way to monitor the presence of a normal KP receptor/transduction machinery. To do this, we used an experimental paradigm previously adopted by other authors (Chen et al., 2014; León et al., 2016) : we treated P45 p140Cap KO and WT females in the diestrus phase of the estrus cycle with 1 nmol of KP-54 and, after 1 h, we collected the hypothalamus, on which we determined the fraction of GnRH neurons that were immunoreactive for c-Fos in their nuclei, by immunostaining. The results show that, upon treatment with KP-54, p140Cap KO and WT mice had a similar fraction of GnRH-ir/c-Fos-ir double-positive cells (Figures 6G, H ), suggesting unaltered responsiveness. 

To further sustain this result, we probed for the surge of LH in the blood of p140Cap KO and WT animals, collected 1 h after treatment with KP-54. Also in this case, we did not observe changes in the LH surge in p140Cap KO versus the WT samples (Figure 6I ). Together, these results indicate that, in the absence of p140Cap, hypothalamic GnRH neurons show a normal response to exogenous KP, excluding a cell autonomous defect of GnRH neurons at the level of KP receptor or its signal transduction.
section_name: p140Cap KO Females Show Delayed Maturation of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons

section_content: Two other key elements controlling the activity of GnRH neurons are the glutamatergic and the GABAergic synaptic stimulation on these neurons. Studies on immortalized cell lines (such as GT1-7 cells) and on the isolated hypothalamus showed that glutamatergic stimulation positively regulates GnRH release ( Spergel et al., 1994; El-Etr et al., 2006). Since p140Cap is expressed in both the pre-and the post-synaptic compartments of glutamatergic synapses and has been shown to be essential for effective glutamatergic synaptogenesis and maturation of dendritic spines (Jaworski et al., 2009; Tomasoni et al., 2013; Repetto et al., 2014), we hypothesized that defects in glutamatergic synapses may contribute to the hypofertility of p140Cap KO female mice. First, we examined the overall density of glutamatergic (VGLUT-ir) punctae in anatomically matched sections of the OVLT and POA by immunostaining on P60 p140Cap KO and WT animals. We found a significant reduction in their density in the absence of p140Cap (Figures 7A, B ), indicating that p140Cap is required for efficient glutamatergic synaptogenesis in these areas. Then, we specifically determined the number of VGLUT-ir punctae in close apposition to the soma of GnRH neurons at P10 and P60 in p140Cap KO and WT mice. We observed a significant reduction in the average number of VGLUT-ir punctae per GnRH neuron at both P10 (Figures 7C, D ) and P60 (Figures 7E, F ) in p140Cap KO animals, as compared to WT. This result suggests that GnRH neurons of p140Cap KO animals are inefficiently innervated by glutamatergic synapses. 

We also examined the density of GABAergic (VGAT-ir) punctae in close apposition to the perisomatic surface of GnRH neurons, comparing p140Cap KO and WT hypothalami, but we observed no significant difference at both P10 (Supplementary Figures 5A, B ) and P60 (Supplementary Figures 5C, D ). Considering that KP neurons represent the primary modulators of GnRH neurons, we finally assessed the number of VGLUTir and VGAT-ir punctae in close apposition to KP neurons in the RP3V of p140Cap KO and WT P120 female mice in the proestrus phase of the estrus cycle. We observed no difference in the number of both VGLUT-ir and VGAT-ir punctae comparing the two genotypes (Supplementary Figures 5E, F ).
section_name: p140Cap KO Females Show a Reduced Number of Glutamatergic Synapses in the Organum Vasculosum of the Lamina Terminalis and on Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons

section_content: Here we report that the loss of the adaptor protein p140Cap is responsible for a striking reproductive defect in female mice, characterized by reduced number of litters, impaired ovulation, absent elevation of E2 and LH during proestrus, and delayed puberty onset. In the absence of p140Cap, adult hypothalamic GnRH neurons exhibit a mature morphology and normal responsiveness to KP stimulation, are reduced in number, project fewer axons to the ME, show reduced glutamatergic innervations, and fail to exert a proper gonadotropic action. 

The failure to elevate E2 and LH during proestrus in p140Cap KO females implies that the loss of p140Cap impairs the regulation of the pre-ovulatory gonadotropin surge. This phenotype has a clear central hypothalamic origin as p140Cap is not expressed in the adult pituitary gland and ovaries, but it is expressed in various regions of the developing and adult brain, including the hypothalamus. Furthermore, the pituitary gland of p140Cap KO females is able to produce an LH surge upon administration of exogenous KP, and the ovaries of p140Cap KO mice retain their ability to undertake ovulation upon exogenous hormonal stimulation. 

Focusing on the status of GnRH neurons at different ages, we observed that, in p140Cap KO adult females, the number of GnRH neurons and their projections to the ME are reduced, accompanied by a decreased expression of LH and GnRH mRNAs in the pituitary gland and hypothalamus, respectively. In contrast, at birth and early postnatal stages (P10), the number of GnRH neurons in p140Cap KO females is normal. Thus, the decline of GnRH neurons might occur between the juvenile and the adult stage. A similar loss of GnRH neurons, together with hypofertility or infertility, is a hallmark of a number of murine models of Kallmann syndrome and normosmotic idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, such as homozygous Fgf8 and Fgfr1 hypomorphs, in which GnRH neurons fail to emerge (Chung et al., 2008), Sema3e KO, in which a large fraction of GnRH neurons undergo apoptosis (Cariboni et al., 2015), Prok2 KO, and Prok2r KO, in which GnRH neurons show defective migration (Matsumoto et al., 2006; Pitteloud et al., 2007). A loss of GnRH neurons was also observed in Rabconnectin-3α KO and heterozygous Fgf8 hypomorphic mice (Zhang et al., 2015; Tata et al., 2017), although the cause of such loss in these models remains undetermined. Similarly, we were not able to identify the cause of the loss of GnRH neurons in p140Cap KO mice, as our data seem to exclude altered migration during embryonic development, impaired neurogenesis, and altered survival of GnRH neurons. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that, in the absence of p140Cap, GnRH neurons undergo apoptosis in a very specific and limited time window. Alternatively, it is possible that, in p140Cap KO mice, apoptosis of GnRH neurons occurs over an extended time window at a rate that is too low to be appreciated. Another hypothesis is that the loss of GnRH neurons in p140Cap KO mice is due to a defect in GnRH gene expression in a subpopulation of GnRH neurons. Importantly, the reduction in the number of total GnRH neurons is not accountable for the hypofertility phenotype observed in p140Cap KO female mice, as it has been shown that a ∼60% reduction in the number of total GnRH neurons is still compatible with normal puberty onset and fertility (Herbison et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2015). To clarify the mechanism by which p140Cap controls GnRH neuronal maturation and gonadotropic activity, we examined the expression of p140Cap at key time points of GnRH neuron development. At embryonic stages, a consistent fraction of migrating GnRH neurons express p140Cap, whereas in adult (P60) stages p140Cap expression is not observed in GnRH neurons but is evident in other hypothalamic neuronal populations of the OVLT and ARC. Nevertheless, at birth and in early postnatal life, the number and position of GnRH neurons show no significant changes in p140Cap KO mice, indicating that their ability to migrate and reach their final location is normal. At P10, GnRH neurons of p140Cap KO females show a delayed morphological maturation, with a larger fraction of them being multipolar, an index of delayed maturation (Cottrell et al., 2006; Ybarra et al., 2011; Tata et al., 2014). On the contrary, the adult GnRH neurons show a normal morphology, suggesting that the maturation delay has been overcome. An intriguing possibility is that the maturation delay and increased cell death/impaired GnRH gene expression of GnRH neurons observed in adult p140Cap KO mice concern only the subpopulation of GnRH neurons expressing p140Cap during embryonic development. 

In p140cap KO mice, the adult GnRH neurons show normal immediate responsiveness to exogenous KP, suggesting that the hypofertility phenotype of p140Cap KO females does not depend on cell-autonomous defects of GnRH neurons. Furthermore, the number and fiber extension of KP neurons also appear normal in the absence of p140Cap. However, KP neurons function was not assessed. Thus, we cannot exclude that a misfunction of the KP system contributes to the observed gonadotropic phenotype in p140Cap KO females. 

In the absence of p140Cap, we observe a lower density of VGLUT-ir punctae suggestive of reduced glutamatergic synapses in the OVLT and POA, and in particular on the GnRH neurons, at both P10 and P60. Thus, p140Cap may be required for the efficient formation and/or stabilization of glutamatergic synapses in these regions. We previously showed that p140Cap controls cytoskeleton dynamics at dendritic spines and participates in synaptic maturation and stability, based on acute knockdown and KO mouse models (Tomasoni et al., 2013; Repetto et al., 2014). This observation has been extended in recently published reports indicating that p140Cap acts pre-and post-synaptically to promote the formation and stabilization of glutamatergic synapses in the forebrain (Boyken et al., 2013; Li et al., 2017). 

Several lines of evidence indicate that glutamatergic stimulation in the hypothalamus is critical for GnRH neurons activity and fertility: glutamate stimulates GnRH release from GT1-7 cells in vitro (Spergel et al., 1994; El-Etr et al., 2006) and from hypothalamic fragments ex vivo (Ondo et al., 1988) ; In vivo, the number of VGLUT-ir punctae on GnRH neurons increases on proestrus, and blockage of glutamate neurotransmission on proestrus through glutamate receptor antagonists leads to a significant attenuation of the LH surge (Khan et al., 2010). However, it is currently unclear whether the GnRH releasepromoting activity of glutamate depends on direct stimulation of GnRH neurons or the activation of dedicated circuits, that, in turn, promote and/or synchronize their activity. Such circuits include KP neurons of the RP3V and glutamatergic interconnected KNDY neurons (coexpressing KP, neurokinin B, and dynorphin A) of the ARC (Nagae et al., 2021; Nandankar et al., 2021). Some observations seem to exclude a direct role of glutamatergic stimulation on GnRH neurons: peripheral injection of NMDA fails to induce LH release in Kiss1 KO mice (d'Anglemont de Tassigny et al., 2010) and mice lacking GluA2-containing AMPA receptors or all NMDA receptors only in GnRH neurons exhibit normal puberty onset and fertility (Shimshek et al., 2006). Nevertheless, in these mutant mice, other neurotransmitter receptors may have compensated for the lack of GluA2-containing AMPA receptors or NMDA receptors during development. 

Given these considerations, the hypoactivity of the HPG axis in p140Cap KO female mice is probably due to non-cellautonomous effects: either reduced glutamatergic stimulation of GnRH neurons or to a defective glutamatergic circuitry in the hypothalamus. Moreover, hypofertility of p140Cap KO females may be also due to a global maladaptation or secondary effects caused by the depletion of p140Cap in the hypothalamus. 

We also found a normal density of VGAT-ir punctae in close apposition to GnRH neurons. This observation is in line with the recent recognition of the essential role of KP/GABA cotransmission onto GnRH neurons for ovulation (Piet et al., 2018) and suggests that, in mice, the action of glutamate on GnRH neurons is largely independent of the RP3V kisspeptidergic system. However, this does not exclude a possible important role of glutamate signaling at the level of the ARC KNDY neurons, which may have been impacted in the p140Cap KO thus indirectly affecting GnRH function. Notably, data from singlecell RNA-seq datasets indicate that at least a fraction of mouse ARC KNDY neurons express p140Cap (Campbell et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2017), and it has been shown that these neurons receive glutamatergic inputs which are likely to mediate the effects of E2 on these cells (Wang et al., 2018). 

Synchronicity has been shown to be essential for efficient pulsatile secretion of GnRH, which, in turn, is required for an efficient gonadotropic function in females (Grachev and Goodman, 2016; Herbison, 2018). Interestingly, in the absence of p140Cap, altered synchronization of hippocampal neuron culture has been recently shown (Russo et al., 2019). Thus, the absence of p140Cap in the hypothalamus may affect both VGLUT-ir synaptic formation and the complex neuronal networks underlying GnRH neurons pulse generation and synchronization. Defining the exact effect of glutamatergic signaling in this network and specifically on GnRH neurons maturation and function will add relevant information to the mechanism underlying the control of GnRH secretion.
section_name: DISCUSSION

section_name: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

section_content: We thank Marta Gai ( Università di Torino, Italy ) for helpful assistance in image acquisition and analysis. We are grateful to G. Tramu ( Université Bordeaux I, Talence, France ) for the kind gift of the rabbit anti-GnRH antibody and to Erik Hrabovszky ( Institute of Experimental Medicine, Budapest, Hungary ) for the kind gift of the sheep anti-GnRH antibody. We thank Sara Trova, Sara Bonzano, Paolo Peretto, Maurizio Giustetto and Silvia De Marchis ( Università di Torino, Italy ) for sharing reagents.
section_name: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

section_name: FUNDING

section_content: This work was supported by MIUR (Ministero dell'Istruzione, Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca, PRIN 2010/2011 ), AIRC ( Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro) to PD ( IG-15399 ); Compagnia di San Paolo -Torino ; Progetto d'Ateneo, University of Turin 2011 to PD and ET; University of Turin RiLo to GRM, Telethon Foundation -Italy to GRM. PG was grateful to ANR-14-CE12-0015-01 ( RoSes and GnRH) for financial support.
section_name: FUNDING

section_name: DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

section_content: The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
section_name: DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

section_name: ETHICS STATEMENT

section_content: The animal study was reviewed and approved by Italian Ministry of Health.
section_name: ETHICS STATEMENT

section_name: AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

section_content: The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www. frontiersin. org/articles/10. 3389/fnins. 2022. 744693/full#supplementary-material
section_name: SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

section_content: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. 

Publisher's Note: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher. 

Copyright © 2022 Camera, Russo, Zamboni, Ammoni, Rando, Morellato, Cimino, Angelini, Giacobini, Oleari, Amoruso, Cariboni, Franceschini, Turco, Defilippi and Merlo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
section_name: Conflict of Interest: